nursing structured literature review

Nursing: How to Write a Literature Review

• Traditional or Narrative Literature Review

Getting started

1. start with your research question, 2. search the literature, 3. read & evaluate, 4. finalize results, 5. write & revise, brainfuse online tutoring and writing review.

• RESEARCH HELP

The best way to approach your literature review is to break it down into steps.  Remember, research is an iterative process, not a linear one.  You will revisit steps and revise along the way.  Get started with the handout, information, and tips from various university Writing Centers below that provides an excellent overview.  Then move on to the specific steps recommended on this page.

• UNC- Chapel Hill Writing Center Literature Review Handout, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
• University of Wisconsin-Madison Writing Center Learn how to write a review of literature, from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
• University of Toronto-- Writing Advice The Literature Review: A few tips on conducting it, from the University of Toronto.
• Begin with a topic.
• Understand the topic. 
• Familiarize yourself with the terminology.  Note what words are being used and keep track of these for use as database search keywords. 
• See what research has been done on this topic before you commit to the topic.  Review articles can be helpful to understand what research has been done .
• Develop your research question.  (see handout below)
• How comprehensive should it be? 
• Is it for a course assignment or a dissertation? 
• How many years should it cover?
• Developing a good nursing research question Handout. Reviews PICO method and provides search tips.

Your next step is to construct a search strategy and then locate & retrieve articles.

•  There are often 2-4 key concepts in a research question.
• Search for primary sources (original research articles.)
• These are based on the key concepts in your research question.
• Remember to consider synonyms and related terms.
• Which databases to search?
• What limiters should be applied (peer-reviewed, publication date, geographic location, etc.)?

Review articles (secondary sources)

Use to identify literature on your topic, the way you would use a bibliography.  Then locate and retrieve the original studies discussed in the review article. Review articles are considered secondary sources.

• Once you have some relevant articles, review reference lists to see if there are any useful articles.
• Which articles were written later and have cited some of your useful articles?  Are these, in turn, articles that will be useful to you? 
• Keep track of what terms you used and what databases you searched. 
• Use database tools such as save search history in EBSCO to help.
• Keep track of the citations for the articles you will be using in your literature review. 
• Use RefWorks or another method of tracking this information. 
• Database Search Strategy Worksheet Handout. How to construct a search.
• TUTORIAL: How to do a search based on your research question This is a self-paced, interactive tutorial that reviews how to construct and perform a database search in CINAHL.

The next step is to read, review, and understand the articles.

• Start by reviewing abstracts. 
• Make sure you are selecting primary sources (original research articles).
• Note any keywords authors report using when searching for prior studies.
• You will need to evaluate and critique them and write a synthesis related to your research question.
• Consider using a matrix to organize and compare and contrast the articles . 
• Which authors are conducting research in this area?  Search by author.  
• Are there certain authors’ whose work is cited in many of your articles?  Did they write an early, seminal article that is often cited?
• Searching is a cyclical process where you will run searches, review results, modify searches, run again, review again, etc. 
• Critique articles.  Keep or exclude based on whether they are relevant to your research question.
• When you have done a thorough search using several databases plus Google Scholar, using appropriate keywords or subject terms, plus author’s names, and you begin to find the same articles over and over.
• Remember to consider the scope of your project and the length of your paper.  A dissertation will have a more exhaustive literature review than an 8 page paper, for example.
• What are common findings among each group or where do they disagree? 
• Identify common themes. Identify controversial or problematic areas in the research. 
• Use your matrix to organize this.
• Once you have read and re-read your articles and organized your findings, you are ready to begin the process of writing the literature review.

2. Synthesize.  (see handout below)

• Include a synthesis of the articles you have chosen for your literature review.
• A literature review is NOT a list or a summary of what has been written on a particular topic. 
• It analyzes the articles in terms of how they relate to your research question. 
• While reading, look for similarities and differences (compare and contrast) among the articles.  You will create your synthesis from this.
• Synthesis Examples Handout. Sample excerpts that illustrate synthesis.

Regis Online students have access to Brainfuse. Brainfuse is an online tutoring service available through a link in Moodle. Meet with a tutor in a live session or submit your paper for review.

• Brainfuse Tutoring and Writing Assistance for Regis Online Students by Tricia Reinhart Last Updated Oct 26, 2023 81 views this year
• << Previous: Traditional or Narrative Literature Review
• Next: eBooks >>
• Last Updated: Feb 21, 2024 12:05 PM
• URL: https://libguides.regiscollege.edu/nursing_litreview

• University of Detroit Mercy
• Health Professions
• Writing a Literature Review
• Find Articles (Databases)
• Evidence Based Nursing
• Searching Tips
• Books / eBooks
• Nursing Theory
• Adult-Gerontology Clinical Nurse Specialist
• Doctor of Nursing Practice
• NHL and CNL (Clinical Nurse Leader)
• Nurse Anesthesia
• Nursing Education
• Nurse Practitioner (FNP / ENP)
• Undergraduate Nursing - Clinical Reference Library
• General Writing Support
• Creating & Printing Posters
• Statistics: Health / Medical
• Health Measurement Instruments
• Streaming Video
• Anatomy Resources
• Database & Library Help
• Web Resources
• Evaluating Websites
• Medical / Nursing Apps & Mobile Sites
• Faculty Publications

Literature Review Overview

What is a Literature Review? Why Are They Important?

A literature review is important because it presents the "state of the science" or accumulated knowledge on a specific topic. It summarizes, analyzes, and compares the available research, reporting study strengths and weaknesses, results, gaps in the research, conclusions, and authors’ interpretations.

Tips and techniques for conducting a literature review are described more fully in the subsequent boxes:

• Literature review steps
• Strategies for organizing the information for your review
• Literature reviews sections
• In-depth resources to assist in writing a literature review
• Templates to start your review
• Literature review examples

Literature Review Steps

Graphic used with permission: Torres, E. Librarian, Hawai'i Pacific University

1. Choose a topic and define your research question

• Try to choose a topic of interest. You will be working with this subject for several weeks to months.
• Ideas for topics can be found by scanning medical news sources (e.g MedPage Today), journals / magazines, work experiences, interesting patient cases, or family or personal health issues.
• Do a bit of background reading on topic ideas to familiarize yourself with terminology and issues. Note the words and terms that are used.
• Develop a focused research question using PICO(T) or other framework (FINER, SPICE, etc - there are many options) to help guide you.
• Run a few sample database searches to make sure your research question is not too broad or too narrow.
• If possible, discuss your topic with your professor. 

2. Determine the scope of your review

The scope of your review will be determined by your professor during your program. Check your assignment requirements for parameters for the Literature Review.

• How many studies will you need to include?
• How many years should it cover? (usually 5-7 depending on the professor)
• For the nurses, are you required to limit to nursing literature?

3. Develop a search plan

• Determine which databases to search. This will depend on your topic. If you are not sure, check your program specific library website (Physician Asst / Nursing / Health Services Admin) for recommendations.
• Create an initial search string using the main concepts from your research (PICO, etc) question. Include synonyms and related words connected by Boolean operators
• Contact your librarian for assistance, if needed.

4. Conduct searches and find relevant literature

• Keep notes as you search - tracking keywords and search strings used in each database in order to avoid wasting time duplicating a search that has already been tried
• Read abstracts and write down new terms to search as you find them
• Check MeSH or other subject headings listed in relevant articles for additional search terms
• Scan author provided keywords if available
• Check the references of relevant articles looking for other useful articles (ancestry searching)
• Check articles that have cited your relevant article for more useful articles (descendancy searching). Both PubMed and CINAHL offer Cited By links
• Revise the search to broaden or narrow your topic focus as you peruse the available literature
• Conducting a literature search is a repetitive process. Searches can be revised and re-run multiple times during the process.
• Track the citations for your relevant articles in a software citation manager such as RefWorks, Zotero, or Mendeley

5. Review the literature

• Read the full articles. Do not rely solely on the abstracts. Authors frequently cannot include all results within the confines of an abstract. Exclude articles that do not address your research question.
• While reading, note research findings relevant to your project and summarize. Are the findings conflicting? There are matrices available than can help with organization. See the Organizing Information box below.
• Critique / evaluate the quality of the articles, and record your findings in your matrix or summary table. Tools are available to prompt you what to look for. (See Resources for Appraising a Research Study box on the HSA, Nursing , and PA guides )
• You may need to revise your search and re-run it based on your findings.

6. Organize and synthesize

• Compile the findings and analysis from each resource into a single narrative.
• Using an outline can be helpful. Start broad, addressing the overall findings and then narrow, discussing each resource and how it relates to your question and to the other resources.
• Cite as you write to keep sources organized.
• Write in structured paragraphs using topic sentences and transition words to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.
• Don't present one study after another, but rather relate one study's findings to another. Speak to how the studies are connected and how they relate to your work.

Organizing Information

Options to assist in organizing sources and information :

1. Synthesis Matrix

• helps provide overview of the literature
• information from individual sources is entered into a grid to enable writers to discern patterns and themes
• article summary, analysis, or results
• thoughts, reflections, or issues
• each reference gets its own row
• mind maps, concept maps, flowcharts
• at top of page record PICO or research question
• record major concepts / themes from literature
• list concepts that branch out from major concepts underneath - keep going downward hierarchically, until most specific ideas are recorded
• enclose concepts in circles and connect the concept with lines - add brief explanation as needed

3. Summary Table

• information is recorded in a grid to help with recall and sorting information when writing
• allows comparing and contrasting individual studies easily
• purpose of study
• methodology (study population, data collection tool)

Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2019). Writing the literature review : A practical guide . Guilford Press.

Literature Review Sections

• Lit reviews can be part of a larger paper / research study or they can be the focus of the paper
• Lit reviews focus on research studies to provide evidence
• New topics may not have much that has been published

* The sections included may depend on the purpose of the literature review (standalone paper or section within a research paper)

Standalone Literature Review (aka Narrative Review):

• presents your topic or PICO question
• includes the why of the literature review and your goals for the review.
• provides background for your the topic and previews the key points
• Narrative Reviews: tmay not have an explanation of methods.
• include where the search was conducted (which databases) what subject terms or keywords were used, and any limits or filters that were applied and why - this will help others re-create the search
• describe how studies were analyzed for inclusion or exclusion
• review the purpose and answer the research question
• thematically - using recurring themes in the literature
• chronologically - present the development of the topic over time
• methodological - compare and contrast findings based on various methodologies used to research the topic (e.g. qualitative vs quantitative, etc.)
• theoretical - organized content based on various theories
• provide an overview of the main points of each source then synthesize the findings into a coherent summary of the whole
• present common themes among the studies
• compare and contrast the various study results
• interpret the results and address the implications of the findings
• do the results support the original hypothesis or conflict with it
• provide your own analysis and interpretation (eg. discuss the significance of findings; evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the studies, noting any problems)
• discuss common and unusual patterns and offer explanations
•  stay away from opinions, personal biases and unsupported recommendations
• summarize the key findings and relate them back to your PICO/research question
• note gaps in the research and suggest areas for further research
• this section should not contain "new" information that had not been previously discussed in one of the sections above
• provide a list of all the studies and other sources used in proper APA 7

Literature Review as Part of a Research Study Manuscript:

• Compares the study with other research and includes how a study fills a gap in the research.
• Focus on the body of the review which includes the synthesized Findings and Discussion

Literature Reviews vs Systematic Reviews

Systematic Reviews are NOT the same as a Literature Review:

Literature Reviews:

• Literature reviews may or may not follow strict systematic methods to find, select, and analyze articles, but rather they selectively and broadly review the literature on a topic
• Research included in a Literature Review can be "cherry-picked" and therefore, can be very subjective

Systematic Reviews:

• Systemic reviews are designed to provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence for a focused research question
• rigorous and strictly structured, using standardized reporting guidelines (e.g. PRISMA, see link below)
• uses exhaustive, systematic searches of all relevant databases
• best practice dictates search strategies are peer reviewed
• uses predetermined study inclusion and exclusion criteria in order to minimize bias
• aims to capture and synthesize all literature (including unpublished research - grey literature) that meet the predefined criteria on a focused topic resulting in high quality evidence

Literature Review Examples

• Breastfeeding initiation and support: A literature review of what women value and the impact of early discharge (2017). Women and Birth : Journal of the Australian College of Midwives
• Community-based participatory research to promote healthy diet and nutrition and prevent and control obesity among African-Americans: A literature review (2017). Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

• Vitamin D deficiency in individuals with a spinal cord injury: A literature review (2017). Spinal Cord

Resources for Writing a Literature Review

These sources have been used in developing this guide.

Resources Used on This Page

Aveyard, H. (2010). Doing a literature review in health and social care : A practical guide . McGraw-Hill Education.

Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). Writing a literature review . Purdue University. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/conducting_research/writing_a_literature_review.html

Torres, E. (2021, October 21). Nursing - graduate studies research guide: Literature review. Hawai'i Pacific University Libraries. Retrieved January 27, 2022, from https://hpu.libguides.com/c.php?g=543891&p=3727230

• << Previous: General Writing Support
• Next: Creating & Printing Posters >>
• Last Updated: Apr 19, 2024 3:11 PM
• URL: https://udmercy.libguides.com/nursing

• school Campus Bookshelves
• menu_book Bookshelves
• perm_media Learning Objects
• login Login
• how_to_reg Request Instructor Account
• hub Instructor Commons
• Download Page (PDF)
• Download Full Book (PDF)
• Periodic Table
• Physics Constants
• Scientific Calculator
• Reference & Cite
• Tools expand_more
• Readability

selected template will load here

This action is not available.

4.10: Literature Review

• Last updated
• Save as PDF
• Page ID 16523

• Lapum et al.
• Ryerson University (Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing) via Ryerson University Library

What it is?

A literature review involves summarizing what is known about a particular topic based on your examination of existing scholarly sources. You may be asked to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment or as part of a larger assignment or research project. It will provide you and your readers with a summary of what is known and the gaps and inconsistencies in the existing literature and/or research approaches used.

A literature review involves synthesizing ideas. A synthesis combines multiple ideas and text into a larger whole. When you are synthesizing multiple texts, you should organize your writing based on the content as opposed to the individual sources. Consider the similar themes across multiple sources and organize your writing according to these themes. You should identify the main ideas in the literature and compare/contrast them with purpose.

Table 4.4 describes the types of literature reviews used in nursing. Various approaches can be used to frame reviews, but all literature reviews involve synthesis skills, with the exception of annotated bibliographies.

Table 4.4: Types of literature reviews

How to do it?

The following discussion explores annotated bibliographies and narrative reviews because these are common in undergraduate nursing curricula.

Annotated Bibliography

There are many ways to complete an annotated bibliography , depending on the assignment requirements. See Figure 4.7 outlining the two components of the annotated bibliography including the citation and the annotation

Figure 4.7 : Components of an annotated bibliography

Here are some general steps to take when completing an annotated bibliography :

• Identify your topic for the bibliography and the number of texts to be included.
• If the texts are not provided for you, search the literature for articles or other types of texts that relate to your topic.
• Take notes while reading and critiquing the identified texts.
• Review your notes and then construct a short annotation summarizing each text’s main points. If a text presents the results of a research study, you also include the study purpose, methods, and conclusions.
• Depending on the outlined requirements or your instructor’s expectations, the annotation may also include brief comments critiquing each text, comparing and contrasting texts, and describing how each text adds to the overall topic of the bibliography.
• A bibliographic citation is included prior to the written annotation. The citation will vary based on what reference style is required; APA formatting is often required in nursing.

**see Chapter 3 and Chapter 9 for more information on critiquing a text for quality and APA style rules.

Narrative literature reviews

Here are some general steps for writing a narrative literature review :

• Narrow and define your topic , and then review the existing literature in that area. You may limit your literature search to certain dates (e.g., the last five years) or certain countries, or certain types of literature such as empirical, theoretical, and/or discussion. You need to decide what sources are acceptable to include, such as journal articles, books, and/or grey literature. You may also check the reference lists of the literature you have found.
• Take notes about the main points and critique the literature while doing pre-reading and during the full reading of the literature that you have located.
• Gather your notes and consider the literature you have reviewed as a whole. Think about: What are the main points across all sources reviewed? Are there common findings across sources? Do some sources contradict each other? What are the strengths and weaknesses in the literature? What are the gaps in the literature?
• Make decisions on how to structure your review . The structure is often based on content trends across the various sources; these trends can be used as sub-headings to help you categorize and organize your writing. You might also organize a literature review chronologically, particularly if “time” is an important element. Some literature reviews are organized by method, with sub-sections focusing on theoretical, qualitative, survey, and intervention studies.
• Use topic sentences in each paragraph and logically link each paragraph and section to the next.

What to keep in mind?

As you are writing literature reviews, keep in mind several points:

• Annotated bibliographies are concise and typically presented as one paragraph, ranging from 100–300 words, but expectations vary, so check the assignment guidelines or ask your instructor.
• Narrative literature reviews are much longer and vary in length based on the reason for writing it. If it is part of a larger assignment, your instructor may provide you a specific length. If it is part of an article publishing results from a study, it may serve as a background section and be fairly short (a few paragraphs). If it is part of a graduate thesis, it may form one of your chapters and may be many pages long.

Activity: Check Your Understanding

The original version of this chapter contained H5P content. You may want to remove or replace this element.

• Technical Support
• Find My Rep

You are here

Doing a Literature Review in Nursing, Health and Social Care

• Michael Coughlan - Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
• Patricia Cronin - Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
• Description

A clear and practical guide to completing a literature review in nursing and healthcare studies.

Providing students with straightforward guidance on how to successfully carry out a literature review as part of a research project or dissertation, this book uses examples and activities to demonstrate how to complete each step correctly, from start to finish, and highlights how to avoid common mistakes.

The third edition includes:

• Expert advice on selecting and researching a topic
• A chapter outlining the different types of literature review
• Increased focus on Critical Appraisal Tools and how to use them effectively
• New real-world examples presenting best practice
• Instructions on writing up and presenting the final piece of work

Perfect for any nursing or healthcare student new to literature reviews and for anyone who needs a refresher in this important topic.

See what’s new to this edition by selecting the Features tab on this page. Should you need additional information or have questions regarding the HEOA information provided for this title, including what is new to this edition, please email [email protected] . Please include your name, contact information, and the name of the title for which you would like more information. For information on the HEOA, please go to http://ed.gov/policy/highered/leg/hea08/index.html .

For assistance with your order: Please email us at [email protected] or connect with your SAGE representative.

SAGE 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 www.sagepub.com

Praise for the previous edition:

'This book is an excellent resource for practitioners wishing to develop their knowledge and understanding of reviewing literature and the processes involved. It uses uncomplicated language to signpost the reader effortlessly through key aspects of research processes. Practitioners will find this an invaluable companion for navigating through evidence to identify quality literature applicable to health and social care practice.' 

'Students often struggle with writing an effective literature review and this invaluable guide will help to allay their concerns. Key terms are clearly explained, and the inclusion of learning outcomes is a helpful feature for students and lecturers alike.  The examples are also very helpful, particularly for less confident students.  This is an accessible yet authoritative guide which I can thoroughly recommend.' 

'A must have - this book provides useful information and guidance to students and professionals alike. It guides the reader through various research methods in a theoretical and pragmatic manner.' 

' It's a very readable, concise, and accessible introduction to undertaking a literature review in the field of healthcare. The book’s layout has a logical format which really helped me to think methodically about my research question. An excellent reference for undergraduates who are about to undertake their first literature review.' 

'This book is an essential resource for students. Clearly written and excellently structured, with helpful study tools throughout, it takes the reader step by step through the literature review process in an easy, informative and accessible manner. This text gives students the skills they need to successfully complete their own review.' 

'The updating of the chapters will be exceptionally helpful given the rapid changes in online availability of resources and open-access literature.'  

Excellent resource. Useful for any stage of studying

Excellent text for masters and doctoral level students

An excellent primer to help the level 7 students write their systemised review for the assignment.

This book provides a comprehensive overview of the practical process of literature review in healthcare. It contains all details required to conduct a review by students.

This is an excellent clear and concise book on undertaking literature reviews being particularly good at demystifying jargon. It is timely given the move to student dissertations being primarily literature reviews in the current Covid pandemic. However nearly all the examples are drawn from nursing and health making the text less useful for social care and social work. A little disappointing given the title. SW students are likely to gravitate to texts where their subject is more prominent for a primary text.

Accessible, informative, step to step guide

This is a really helpful, accessible text for students and academic staff alike.

A really good addition to the repertoire of skills and techniques for understanding the essential process of literature reviewing.

Preview this book

For instructors, select a purchasing option, related products.

Nursing: Literature Review

• Required Texts
• Writing Assistance and Organizing & Citing References
• NCLEX Resources
• Literature Review
• MSN Students
• Physical Examination
• Drug Information
• Professional Organizations
• Mobile Apps
• Evidence-based Medicine
• Certifications
• Recommended Nursing Textbooks
• DNP Students
• Conducting Research
• Scoping Reviews
• Systematic Reviews
• Distance Education Students
• Ordering from your Home Library

Good Place to Start: Citation Databases

Interdisciplinary Citation Databases:

A good place to start your research  is to search a research citation database to view the scope of literature available on your topic.

TIP #1: SEED ARTICLE Begin your research with a "seed article" - an article that strongly supports your research topic.  Then use a citation database to follow the studies published by finding articles which have cited that article, either because they support it or because they disagree with it.

TIP #2: SNOWBALLING Snowballing is the process where researchers will begin with a select number of articles they have identified relevant/strongly supports their topic and then search each articles' references reviewing the studies cited to determine if they are relevant to your research.

BONUS POINTS: This process also helps identify key highly cited authors within a topic to help establish the "experts" in the field.

Begin by constructing a focused research question to help you then convert it into an effective search strategy.

• Identify keywords or synonyms
• Type of study/resources
• Which database(s) to search
• Asking a Good Question (PICO)
• PICO - AHRQ
• PICO - Worksheet
• What Is a PICOT Question?

Seminal Works: Search Key Indexing/Citation Databases

• Google Scholar
• Web of Science

TIP – How to Locate Seminal Works

• DO NOT: Limit by date range or you might overlook the seminal works
• DO: Look at highly cited references (Seminal articles are frequently referred to “cited” in the research)
• DO: Search citation databases like Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar

Web Resources

What is a literature review?

A literature review is a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of published information on a subject area. Conducting a literature review demands a careful examination of a body of literature that has been published that helps answer your research question (See PICO). Literature reviewed includes scholarly journals, scholarly books, authoritative databases, primary sources and grey literature.

A literature review attempts to answer the following:

• What is known about the subject?
• What is the chronology of knowledge about my subject?
• Are there any gaps in the literature?
• Is there a consensus/debate on issues?
• Create a clear research question/statement
• Define the scope of the review include limitations (i.e. gender, age, location, nationality...)
• Search existing literature including classic works on your topic and grey literature
• Evaluate results and the evidence (Avoid discounting information that contradicts your research)
• Track and organize references
• How to conduct an effective literature search.
• Social Work Literature Review Guidelines (OWL Purdue Online Writing Lab)

What is PICO?

The PICO model can help you formulate a good clinical question. Sometimes it's referred to as PICO-T, containing an optional 5th factor. 

Search Example

• << Previous: NCLEX Resources
• Next: MSN Students >>

• Last Updated: Apr 9, 2024 1:30 PM
• URL: https://guides.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/Nursing

• Himmelfarb Intranet
• Privacy Notice
• Terms of Use
• GW is committed to digital accessibility. If you experience a barrier that affects your ability to access content on this page, let us know via the Accessibility Feedback Form .
• Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library
• 2300 Eye St., NW, Washington, DC 20037
• Phone: (202) 994-2850
• [email protected]
• https://himmelfarb.gwu.edu

This website is intended for healthcare professionals

• { $refs.search.focus(); })" aria-controls="searchpanel" :aria-expanded="open" class="hidden lg:inline-flex justify-end text-gray-800 hover:text-primary py-2 px-4 lg:px-0 items-center text-base font-medium"> Search

Search menu

Bashir Y, Conlon KC. Step by step guide to do a systematic review and meta-analysis for medical professionals. Ir J Med Sci. 2018; 187:(2)447-452 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1663-3

Bettany-Saltikov J. How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: a step-by-step guide.Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2012

Bowers D, House A, Owens D. Getting started in health research.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011

Hierarchies of evidence. 2016. http://cjblunt.com/hierarchies-evidence (accessed 23 July 2019)

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2008; 3:(2)37-41 https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Developing a framework for critiquing health research. 2005. https://tinyurl.com/y3nulqms (accessed 22 July 2019)

Cognetti G, Grossi L, Lucon A, Solimini R. Information retrieval for the Cochrane systematic reviews: the case of breast cancer surgery. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2015; 51:(1)34-39 https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_01_07

Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35

Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC Users' guides to the medical literature IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. JAMA. 1995; 274:(22)1800-1804 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530220066035

Hanley T, Cutts LA. What is a systematic review? Counselling Psychology Review. 2013; 28:(4)3-6

Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. 2011. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org (accessed 23 July 2019)

Jahan N, Naveed S, Zeshan M, Tahir MA. How to conduct a systematic review: a narrative literature review. Cureus. 2016; 8:(11) https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.864

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1997; 33:(1)159-174

Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6:(7) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Mueller J, Jay C, Harper S, Davies A, Vega J, Todd C. Web use for symptom appraisal of physical health conditions: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19:(6) https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6755

Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med. 2016; 21:(4)125-127 https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance. 2012. http://nice.org.uk/process/pmg4 (accessed 22 July 2019)

Sambunjak D, Franic M. Steps in the undertaking of a systematic review in orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop. 2012; 36:(3)477-484 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1460-y

Siddaway AP, Wood AM, Hedges LV. How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019; 70:747-770 https://doi.org/0.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Wallace J, Nwosu B, Clarke M. Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers' perceptions. BMJ Open. 2012; 2:(5) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001220

Carrying out systematic literature reviews: an introduction

Alan Davies

Lecturer in Health Data Science, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester

View articles · Email Alan

Systematic reviews provide a synthesis of evidence for a specific topic of interest, summarising the results of multiple studies to aid in clinical decisions and resource allocation. They remain among the best forms of evidence, and reduce the bias inherent in other methods. A solid understanding of the systematic review process can be of benefit to nurses that carry out such reviews, and for those who make decisions based on them. An overview of the main steps involved in carrying out a systematic review is presented, including some of the common tools and frameworks utilised in this area. This should provide a good starting point for those that are considering embarking on such work, and to aid readers of such reviews in their understanding of the main review components, in order to appraise the quality of a review that may be used to inform subsequent clinical decision making.

Since their inception in the late 1970s, systematic reviews have gained influence in the health professions ( Hanley and Cutts, 2013 ). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are considered to be the most credible and authoritative sources of evidence available ( Cognetti et al, 2015 ) and are regarded as the pinnacle of evidence in the various ‘hierarchies of evidence’. Reviews published in the Cochrane Library ( https://www.cochranelibrary.com) are widely considered to be the ‘gold’ standard. Since Guyatt et al (1995) presented a users' guide to medical literature for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, various hierarchies of evidence have been proposed. Figure 1 illustrates an example.

Systematic reviews can be qualitative or quantitative. One of the criticisms levelled at hierarchies such as these is that qualitative research is often positioned towards or even is at the bottom of the pyramid, thus implying that it is of little evidential value. This may be because of traditional issues concerning the quality of some qualitative work, although it is now widely recognised that both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies have a valuable part to play in answering research questions, which is reflected by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) information concerning methods for developing public health guidance. The NICE (2012) guidance highlights how both qualitative and quantitative study designs can be used to answer different research questions. In a revised version of the hierarchy-of-evidence pyramid, the systematic review is considered as the lens through which the evidence is viewed, rather than being at the top of the pyramid ( Murad et al, 2016 ).

Both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies are sometimes combined in a single review. According to the Cochrane review handbook ( Higgins and Green, 2011 ), regardless of type, reviews should contain certain features, including:

• Clearly stated objectives
• Predefined eligibility criteria for inclusion or exclusion of studies in the review
• A reproducible and clearly stated methodology
• Validity assessment of included studies (eg quality, risk, bias etc).

The main stages of carrying out a systematic review are summarised in Box 1 .

Formulating the research question

Before undertaking a systemic review, a research question should first be formulated ( Bashir and Conlon, 2018 ). There are a number of tools/frameworks ( Table 1 ) to support this process, including the PICO/PICOS, PEO and SPIDER criteria ( Bowers et al, 2011 ). These frameworks are designed to help break down the question into relevant subcomponents and map them to concepts, in order to derive a formalised search criterion ( Methley et al, 2014 ). This stage is essential for finding literature relevant to the question ( Jahan et al, 2016 ).

It is advisable to first check that the review you plan to carry out has not already been undertaken. You can optionally register your review with an international register of prospective reviews called PROSPERO, although this is not essential for publication. This is done to help you and others to locate work and see what reviews have already been carried out in the same area. It also prevents needless duplication and instead encourages building on existing work ( Bashir and Conlon, 2018 ).

A study ( Methley et al, 2014 ) that compared PICO, PICOS and SPIDER in relation to sensitivity and specificity recommended that the PICO tool be used for a comprehensive search and the PICOS tool when time/resources are limited.

The use of the SPIDER tool was not recommended due to the risk of missing relevant papers. It was, however, found to increase specificity.

These tools/frameworks can help those carrying out reviews to structure research questions and define key concepts in order to efficiently identify relevant literature and summarise the main objective of the review ( Jahan et al, 2016 ). A possible research question could be: Is paracetamol of benefit to people who have just had an operation? The following examples highlight how using a framework may help to refine the question:

• What form of paracetamol? (eg, oral/intravenous/suppository)
• Is the dosage important?
• What is the patient population? (eg, children, adults, Europeans)
• What type of operation? (eg, tonsillectomy, appendectomy)
• What does benefit mean? (eg, reduce post-operative pyrexia, analgesia).

An example of a more refined research question could be: Is oral paracetamol effective in reducing pain following cardiac surgery for adult patients? A number of concepts for each element will need to be specified. There will also be a number of synonyms for these concepts ( Table 2 ).

Table 2 shows an example of concepts used to define a search strategy using the PICO statement. It is easy to see even with this dummy example that there are many concepts that require mapping and much thought required to capture ‘good’ search criteria. Consideration should be given to the various terms to describe the heart, such as cardiac, cardiothoracic, myocardial, myocardium, etc, and the different names used for drugs, such as the equivalent name used for paracetamol in other countries and regions, as well as the various brand names. Defining good search criteria is an important skill that requires a lot of practice. A high-quality review gives details of the search criteria that enables the reader to understand how the authors came up with the criteria. A specific, well-defined search criterion also aids in the reproducibility of a review.

Search criteria

Before the search for papers and other documents can begin it is important to explicitly define the eligibility criteria to determine whether a source is relevant to the review ( Hanley and Cutts, 2013 ). There are a number of database sources that are searched for medical/health literature including those shown in Table 3 .

The various databases can be searched using common Boolean operators to combine or exclude search terms (ie AND, OR, NOT) ( Figure 2 ).

Although most literature databases use similar operators, it is necessary to view the individual database guides, because there are key differences between some of them. Table 4 details some of the common operators and wildcards used in the databases for searching. When developing a search criteria, it is a good idea to check concepts against synonyms, as well as abbreviations, acronyms and plural and singular variations ( Cognetti et al, 2015 ). Reading some key papers in the area and paying attention to the key words they use and other terms used in the abstract, and looking through the reference lists/bibliographies of papers, can also help to ensure that you incorporate relevant terms. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) that are used by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) ( https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/meshhome.html) to provide hierarchical biomedical index terms for NLM databases (Medline and PubMed) should also be explored and included in relevant search strategies.

Searching the ‘grey literature’ is also an important factor in reducing publication bias. It is often the case that only studies with positive results and statistical significance are published. This creates a certain bias inherent in the published literature. This bias can, to some degree, be mitigated by the inclusion of results from the so-called grey literature, including unpublished work, abstracts, conference proceedings and PhD theses ( Higgins and Green, 2011 ; Bettany-Saltikov, 2012 ; Cognetti et al, 2015 ). Biases in a systematic review can lead to overestimating or underestimating the results ( Jahan et al, 2016 ).

An example search strategy from a published review looking at web use for the appraisal of physical health conditions can be seen in Box 2 . High-quality reviews usually detail which databases were searched and the number of items retrieved from each.

A balance between high recall and high precision is often required in order to produce the best results. An oversensitive search, or one prone to including too much noise, can mean missing important studies or producing too many search results ( Cognetti et al, 2015 ). Following a search, the exported citations can be added to citation management software (such as Mendeley or Endnote) and duplicates removed.

Title and abstract screening

Initial screening begins with the title and abstracts of articles being read and included or excluded from the review based on their relevance. This is usually carried out by at least two researchers to reduce bias ( Bashir and Conlon, 2018 ). After screening any discrepancies in agreement should be resolved by discussion, or by an additional researcher casting the deciding vote ( Bashir and Conlon, 2018 ). Statistics for inter-rater reliability exist and can be reported, such as percentage of agreement or Cohen's kappa ( Box 3 ) for two reviewers and Fleiss' kappa for more than two reviewers. Agreement can depend on the background and knowledge of the researchers and the clarity of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This highlights the importance of providing clear, well-defined criteria for inclusion that are easy for other researchers to follow.

Full-text review

Following title and abstract screening, the remaining articles/sources are screened in the same way, but this time the full texts are read in their entirety and included or excluded based on their relevance. Reasons for exclusion are usually recorded and reported. Extraction of the specific details of the studies can begin once the final set of papers is determined.

Data extraction

At this stage, the full-text papers are read and compared against the inclusion criteria of the review. Data extraction sheets are forms that are created to extract specific data about a study (12 Jahan et al, 2016 ) and ensure that data are extracted in a uniform and structured manner. Extraction sheets can differ between quantitative and qualitative reviews. For quantitative reviews they normally include details of the study's population, design, sample size, intervention, comparisons and outcomes ( Bettany-Saltikov, 2012 ; Mueller et al, 2017 ).

Quality appraisal

The quality of the studies used in the review should also be appraised. Caldwell et al (2005) discussed the need for a health research evaluation framework that could be used to evaluate both qualitative and quantitative work. The framework produced uses features common to both research methodologies, as well as those that differ ( Caldwell et al, 2005 ; Dixon-Woods et al, 2006 ). Figure 3 details the research critique framework. Other quality appraisal methods do exist, such as those presented in Box 4 . Quality appraisal can also be used to weight the evidence from studies. For example, more emphasis can be placed on the results of large randomised controlled trials (RCT) than one with a small sample size. The quality of a review can also be used as a factor for exclusion and can be specified in inclusion/exclusion criteria. Quality appraisal is an important step that needs to be undertaken before conclusions about the body of evidence can be made ( Sambunjak and Franic, 2012 ). It is also important to note that there is a difference between the quality of the research carried out in the studies and the quality of how those studies were reported ( Sambunjak and Franic, 2012 ).

The quality appraisal is different for qualitative and quantitative studies. With quantitative studies this usually focuses on their internal and external validity, such as how well the study has been designed and analysed, and the generalisability of its findings. Qualitative work, on the other hand, is often evaluated in terms of trustworthiness and authenticity, as well as how transferable the findings may be ( Bettany-Saltikov, 2012 ; Bashir and Conlon, 2018 ; Siddaway et al, 2019 ).

Reporting a review (the PRISMA statement)

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) provides a reporting structure for systematic reviews/meta-analysis, and consists of a checklist and diagram ( Figure 4 ). The stages of identifying potential papers/sources, screening by title and abstract, determining eligibility and final inclusion are detailed with the number of articles included/excluded at each stage. PRISMA diagrams are often included in systematic reviews to detail the number of papers included at each of the four main stages (identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion) of the review.

Data synthesis

The combined results of the screened studies can be analysed qualitatively by grouping them together under themes and subthemes, often referred to as meta-synthesis or meta-ethnography ( Siddaway et al, 2019 ). Sometimes this is not done and a summary of the literature found is presented instead. When the findings are synthesised, they are usually grouped into themes that were derived by noting commonality among the studies included. Inductive (bottom-up) thematic analysis is frequently used for such purposes and works by identifying themes (essentially repeating patterns) in the data, and can include a set of higher-level and related subthemes (Braun and Clarke, 2012). Thomas and Harden (2008) provide examples of the use of thematic synthesis in systematic reviews, and there is an excellent introduction to thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke (2012).

The results of the review should contain details on the search strategy used (including search terms), the databases searched (and the number of items retrieved), summaries of the studies included and an overall synthesis of the results ( Bettany-Saltikov, 2012 ). Finally, conclusions should be made about the results and the limitations of the studies included ( Jahan et al, 2016 ). Another method for synthesising data in a systematic review is a meta-analysis.

Limitations of systematic reviews

Apart from the many advantages and benefits to carrying out systematic reviews highlighted throughout this article, there remain a number of disadvantages. These include the fact that not all stages of the review process are followed rigorously or even at all in some cases. This can lead to poor quality reviews that are difficult or impossible to replicate. There also exist some barriers to the use of evidence produced by reviews, including ( Wallace et al, 2012 ):

• Lack of awareness and familiarity with reviews
• Lack of access
• Lack of direct usefulness/applicability.

Meta-analysis

When the methods used and the analysis are similar or the same, such as in some RCTs, the results can be synthesised using a statistical approach called meta-analysis and presented using summary visualisations such as forest plots (or blobbograms) ( Figure 5 ). This can be done only if the results can be combined in a meaningful way.

Meta-analysis can be carried out using common statistical and data science software, such as the cross-platform ‘R’ ( https://www.r-project.org), or by using standalone software, such as Review Manager (RevMan) produced by the Cochrane community ( https://tinyurl.com/revman-5), which is currently developing a cross-platform version RevMan Web.

Carrying out a systematic review is a time-consuming process, that on average takes between 6 and 18 months and requires skill from those involved. Ideally, several reviewers will work on a review to reduce bias. Experts such as librarians should be consulted and included where possible in review teams to leverage their expertise.

Systematic reviews should present the state of the art (most recent/up-to-date developments) concerning a specific topic and aim to be systematic and reproducible. Reproducibility is aided by transparent reporting of the various stages of a review using reporting frameworks such as PRISMA for standardisation. A high-quality review should present a summary of a specific topic to a high standard upon which other professionals can base subsequent care decisions that increase the quality of evidence-based clinical practice.

• Systematic reviews remain one of the most trusted sources of high-quality information from which to make clinical decisions
• Understanding the components of a review will help practitioners to better assess their quality
• Many formal frameworks exist to help structure and report reviews, the use of which is recommended for reproducibility
• Experts such as librarians can be included in the review team to help with the review process and improve its quality

CPD reflective questions

• Where should high-quality qualitative research sit regarding the hierarchies of evidence?
• What background and expertise should those conducting a systematic review have, and who should ideally be included in the team?
• Consider to what extent inter-rater agreement is important in the screening process

University Library

• Research Guides
• Literature Reviews
• Evidence-Based Practice
• Books & Media

What is a Literature Review?

Key questions for a literature review, examples of literature reviews, useful links, evidence matrix for literature reviews.

• Annotated Bibliographies

The Scholarly Conversation

A literature review provides an overview of previous research on a topic that critically evaluates, classifies, and compares what has already been published on a particular topic. It allows the author to synthesize and place into context the research and scholarly literature relevant to the topic. It helps map the different approaches to a given question and reveals patterns. It forms the foundation for the author’s subsequent research and justifies the significance of the new investigation.

A literature review can be a short introductory section of a research article or a report or policy paper that focuses on recent research. Or, in the case of dissertations, theses, and review articles, it can be an extensive review of all relevant research.

• The format is usually a bibliographic essay; sources are briefly cited within the body of the essay, with full bibliographic citations at the end.
• The introduction should define the topic and set the context for the literature review. It will include the author's perspective or point of view on the topic, how they have defined the scope of the topic (including what's not included), and how the review will be organized. It can point out overall trends, conflicts in methodology or conclusions, and gaps in the research.
• In the body of the review, the author should organize the research into major topics and subtopics. These groupings may be by subject, (e.g., globalization of clothing manufacturing), type of research (e.g., case studies), methodology (e.g., qualitative), genre, chronology, or other common characteristics. Within these groups, the author can then discuss the merits of each article and analyze and compare the importance of each article to similar ones.
• The conclusion will summarize the main findings, make clear how this review of the literature supports (or not) the research to follow, and may point the direction for further research.
• The list of references will include full citations for all of the items mentioned in the literature review.

A literature review should try to answer questions such as

• Who are the key researchers on this topic?
• What has been the focus of the research efforts so far and what is the current status?
• How have certain studies built on prior studies? Where are the connections? Are there new interpretations of the research?
• Have there been any controversies or debate about the research? Is there consensus? Are there any contradictions?
• Which areas have been identified as needing further research? Have any pathways been suggested?
• How will your topic uniquely contribute to this body of knowledge?
• Which methodologies have researchers used and which appear to be the most productive?
• What sources of information or data were identified that might be useful to you?
• How does your particular topic fit into the larger context of what has already been done?
• How has the research that has already been done help frame your current investigation ?

Example of a literature review at the beginning of an article: Forbes, C. C., Blanchard, C. M., Mummery, W. K., & Courneya, K. S. (2015, March). Prevalence and correlates of strength exercise among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors . Oncology Nursing Forum, 42(2), 118+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.sonoma.idm.oclc.org/ps/i.do?p=HRCA&sw=w&u=sonomacsu&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA422059606&asid=27e45873fddc413ac1bebbc129f7649c Example of a comprehensive review of the literature: Wilson, J. L. (2016). An exploration of bullying behaviours in nursing: a review of the literature.   British Journal Of Nursing ,  25 (6), 303-306. For additional examples, see:

Galvan, J., Galvan, M., & ProQuest. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (Seventh ed.). [Electronic book]

Pan, M., & Lopez, M. (2008). Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Pub. [ Q180.55.E9 P36 2008]

• Write a Literature Review (UCSC)
• Literature Reviews (Purdue)
• Literature Reviews: overview (UNC)
• Review of Literature (UW-Madison)

The  Evidence Matrix  can help you  organize your research  before writing your lit review.  Use it to  identify patterns  and commonalities in the articles you have found--similar methodologies ?  common  theoretical frameworks ? It helps you make sure that all your major concepts covered. It also helps you see how your research fits into the context  of the overall topic.

• Evidence Matrix Special thanks to Dr. Cindy Stearns, SSU Sociology Dept, for permission to use this Matrix as an example.
• << Previous: Misc
• Next: Annotated Bibliographies >>
• Last Updated: Jan 8, 2024 2:58 PM
• URL: https://libguides.sonoma.edu/nursing

Reviews of Literature in Nursing Research: Methodological Considerations and Defining Characteristics

Affiliation.

• 1 School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (Ms Silva and Drs Woo, Galica, Wilson, and Luctkar-Flude); School of Nursing, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil (Dr Padilha and Ms Petry); and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Dr Silva E Silva).
• PMID: 35213877
• DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000418

Despite the availability of guidelines about the different types of review literature, the identification of the best approach is not always clear for nursing researchers. Therefore, in this article, we provide a comprehensive guide to be used by health care and nursing scholars while choosing among 4 popular types of reviews (narrative, integrative, scoping, and systematic review), including a descriptive discussion, critical analysis, and decision map tree. Although some review methodologies are more rigorous, it would be inaccurate to say that one is preferable over the others. Instead, each methodology is adequate for a certain type of investigation, nursing methodology research, and research paradigm.

Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Publication types

• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
• Delivery of Health Care
• Nursing Research*
• Research Design
• Research Personnel
• Review Literature as Topic*

• Cancer Nursing Practice
• Emergency Nurse
• Evidence-Based Nursing
• Learning Disability Practice
• Mental Health Practice
• Nurse Researcher
• Nursing Children and Young People
• Nursing Management
• Nursing Older People
• Nursing Standard
• Primary Health Care
• RCN Nursing Awards
• Nursing Live
• Nursing Careers and Job Fairs
• CPD webinars on-demand
• --> Advanced -->

• Clinical articles
• CPD articles
• CPD Quizzes
• Expert advice
• Clinical placements
• Study skills
• Clinical skills
• University life
• Person-centred care
• Career advice
• Revalidation

Clinical research Previous     Next

How to conduct a literature review, john wilkinson lecturer in nursing, institute of advanced nursing education, royal college of nursing, london, christine wilkinson director of nephro-urological and critical care studies, bloomsbury' and islington college of nursing and midwifery, london.

Literature reviews require a range of skills if they are to Ik carried out successfully. This article details some of the skills required and how they can Ik integrated to produce a review relevant to practice.

Nursing Standard . 10, 9, 28-30. doi: 10.7748/ns.10.9.28.s35

> RESEARCH - > WRITING SKILLS

User not found

Want to read more?

Already have access log in, 3-month trial offer for £5.25/month.

• Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
• RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
• NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
• Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
• A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you. Find out more

22 November 1995 / Vol 10 issue 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIGITAL EDITION

• LATEST ISSUE
• SIGN UP FOR E-ALERT
• WRITE FOR US
• PERMISSIONS

Share article: How to conduct a literature review

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience.

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

• Open access
• Published: 26 April 2024

Factors influencing the development of nursing professionalism: a descriptive qualitative study

• Xingyue He 1 ,
• Huili Cao 2 ,
• Linbo Li 1 ,
• Yanming Wu 1 &
• Hui Yang 1 , 3  

BMC Nursing volume  23 , Article number:  283 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

82 Accesses

Metrics details

The shortage of nurses threatens the entire healthcare system, and nursing professionalism can improve nurse retention and enhance the quality of care. However, nursing professionalism is dynamic, and the factors influencing its development are not fully understood.

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Using maximum variation and purposive sampling, 14 southern and northern China participants were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from May 2022 to August 2023 in face-to-face conversations in offices in the workplace or via voice calls. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed via thematic analysis.

Three main themes emerged: (1) nourishment factors: promoting early sprouting; (2) growth factors: the power of self-activation and overcoming challenges; and (3) rootedness factors: stability and upward momentum. Participants described the early acquisition of nursing professionalism as derived from personality traits, family upbringing, and school professional education, promoting the growth of nursing professionalism through self-activation and overcoming challenges, and maintaining the stable and upward development of nursing professionalism through an upward atmosphere and external motivation.

We revealed the dynamic factors that influence the development of nursing professionalism, including “nourishment factors”, “growth factors”, and “rootedness factors”. Our findings provide a foundation for future development of nursing professionalism cultivation strategies. Nursing administrators can guide the development of nurses’ professionalism from many angles according to the stage they are in, and the development of professionalism deserves more attention. In the future, we can no longer consider the development of nursing professionalism solely as the responsibility of individual nurses; the power of families, organizations, and society is indispensable to jointly promoting nursing professionalism among nurses.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The number of nurses leaving hospitals has been increasing, and the shortage of nurses is a significant problem faced globally [ 1 , 2 ]. According to earlier studies, professionalism improves nurses’ clinical performance [ 3 ] and positively affects their adaptability (Park et al. 2021), reducing nurses’ burnout and turnover rates. Therefore, fostering professionalism in nurses and the factors that influence the development of professionalism are essential to producing effective nurses.

Nurses comprise the largest group of healthcare providers [ 4 ]. Nurses are a vital part of the healthcare system, with 27.9 million caregivers worldwide, according to the World Health Organisation’s Global Status of Nursing Report 2020 [ 5 ]. However, an unbalanced number of nurses and patients, high work pressure, and the fact that nurses face patients’ suffering, grief, and death each day have exacerbated burnout and led to the resignation of many nurses [ 6 ]. The COVID-19 outbreak has further exposed the shortage of nursing staff, especially in low- and middle-income countries where the scarcity of nurses remains acute. The lack of nurses not only has direct negative impacts on patients but also poses a threat to the entire healthcare system.

Nursing professionalism is closely associated with nurse retention and nursing practice [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Nursing professionalism is defined as providing individuals care based on the principles of professionalism, caring, and altruism [ 6 ]. As a belief in the profession, nursing professionalism is a systematic view of nursing that represents the practice standards and value orientation nurses utilize [ 10 , 11 ]. According to previous research, nursing professionalism can enhance nurses’ clinical performance and positively impact their adaptability, reducing job burnout and turnover rates [ 6 ]. Furthermore, as nurses are the ones who provide “presence” care, cultivating nursing professionalism among nurses can promote interactions between nurses and patients, further improving the quality of nursing care and patient outcomes and injecting new vitality and hope into the entire healthcare system [ 12 ].

However, nursing professionalism is dynamic, and the cultural context also shapes nursing professionalism to some extent, leading to ambiguity in the factors influencing nursing professionalism. Initially perceived as mere “caregivers,” nurses have transformed into “professional practitioners,” emphasizing the nursing field’s seriousness and distinct professional characteristics [ 13 , 14 ]. Nursing professionalism is also the foundation for developing the nursing profession [ 15 ]. Focusing on the factors influencing the development of nursing professionalism is one of the essential elements in providing an optimal environment for nurses’ professional growth and development in clinical practice [ 16 ]. Although some scales, such as the Hall Professionalism Inventory (HPI) [ 17 ], Miller’s Wheel of Professionalism in Nursing (BIPN) [ 18 ], Hwang’s Nurse Professional Values Scale (NPVS) [ 19 ], and Fantahun’s Nursing Professionalism Questionnaire [ 20 ] have been used to measure factors influencing the awareness, attitudes, and behaviors, they have their limitations. They struggle to encompass professionalism’s multidimensionality and complexity fully, overlook multilayered background factors, are constrained by standardization issues, may not account for individual differences, and often fail to capture dynamic changes over time [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].Compared with quantitative research methods, qualitative research can provide insights into the “unique phenomenology and context of the individual being tested,” which can help the researcher stay close to nurses’ professional lives during the research process and understand the personal, familial, and societal factors that influence nursing professionalism [ 24 ].Additionally, the understanding of nursing professionalism varies across different cultural and social contexts. In Western countries, research on nursing professionalism tends to incorporate professionalism across the entire nursing industry. In contrast, within China, research on professionalism tends to focus more on the individual level, with less attention to the perspectives of groups or the industry [ 25 ]. Therefore, through qualitative research, we can present nursing professionalism in a deeper, more affluent, and more transparent manner. Secondly, it is more authentic to understand the factors influencing nursing professionalism by directly obtaining relevant information from the perspective of nurses through dialogue with research participants as mutual subjects.

Given these considerations, we aim to answer the question of what factors influence the development of nursing professionalism. To provide more targeted strategies and recommendations for optimizing the nursing professional environment, enhancing nurses’ job satisfaction, improving t nursing quality, and contributing sustainably to patients’ and nurses’ health and well-being.

To explore the factors influencing the development of nursing professionalism. By incorporating nurses’ perspectives, we aim to improve our understanding of professionalism as individual, family, and socio-cultural influences. With this knowledge, we can inform strategies for developing nursing professionalism.

Study design

A descriptive qualitative approach was adopted based on naturalistic inquiry [ 26 , 27 ] and analyzed using the thematic analysis method described by Braun and Clarke [ 28 ]. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between May 2022 and August 2023 with nurses in southern and northern China hospitals. Furthermore, the research findings were reported in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) (Supplementary Material S1 ) [ 29 ].

Participants and settings

We chose hospital nurses as study participants based on considerations of their nursing experience. Firstly, the Chinese government has implemented a policy of accountable holistic care, whereby registered nurses take on the entire cycle of a patient’s physical, mental, and spiritual care [ 30 ]. Secondly, new nurses must undergo two weeks to one month of basic training and a 12–24 month specialty rotation (for most new nurses who graduated before 2016, their training was completed by their departments). During this time, they are under the supervision of a superior nurse for holistic and responsible care [ 31 ].

We used maximum variance purposive sampling to recruit a heterogeneous sample of information-rich key participants [ 32 ]. Participant selection considered variations in role classification, years of experience, and educational levels of Chinese nurses [ 33 ]. The purposive variation allowed the discovery of Chinese nurses’ unique perceptions of nursing professionalism. Inclusion criteria: (1) registered nurses (providing direct services to patients within the unit), nurse managers (directly supervising and guiding the clinical work of registered nurses), nursing department managers (managing nurse managers throughout the hospital), with at least one year of nursing experience; (2) voluntary participation. Exclusion criteria: (1) nurses not working during the hospital’s study period (holidays, maternity leave, or sick leave); (2) refresher nurses.

Data collection

The same researcher conducted each interview to ensure consistency. Before the interviews, the interviewers systematically conducted in-depth theoretical research on relevant studies. The interviewer received guidance from professors with rich experience in qualitative research and undertook practice interviews to improve her interviewing skills. Interviewers encouraged interviewees to talk freely about their perceptions and used an interview guide (Supplementary Material S2 ), which was based on the findings of previous research on the conceptual analysis of nursing professionalism [ 6 ]. The questions were open-ended and general; ample space was left between questions to respond to interviewees’ comments. Semi-structured interviews began with a brief introduction to the topic (e.g., definition and explanation of nursing professionalism). Although the interviewer had an agenda for discussion, this format allowed the interviewee to deviate from this agenda and direct follow-up questions [ 34 ].

All interviews were conducted from May 2022 to August 2023 in face-to-face conversations in offices in the workplace or via voice calls and lasted between 35 and 94 min. Participants were asked to complete the main demographic questionnaire at the end of the interviews. The researcher recorded participants’ expressions, body language, and pauses during the interviews. Memos written by the researcher during the study were also used as analytical material.

Data analysis

For rigorous qualitative sampling and data saturation, Braun et al. [ 35 ] propose that qualitative researchers require a sample appropriate to the research questions and the theoretical aims of the study and that can provide an adequate amount of data to answer the question and analyze the issue entirely. We reached thematic saturation after 14 interviews when no new codes or themes emerged.

A thematic analysis approach was used, following the phases described by Braun and Clarke [ 28 ]. The analysis comprised six stages: (1) immersing in the data; (2) creating initial codes; (3) identifying themes; (4) reviewing; (5) defining and labeling these themes; and (6) finally, composing the analysis report. Two researchers transcribed and analyzed the textual data. In the first stage, the researchers carefully read the interview transcripts to familiarize themselves with the depth and breadth of the content. In the second stage, preliminary codes were generated based on the research questions, initial interpretation of the data, and discussion of initial emerging patterns. At this stage, ensuring that all actual data extracts were coded and organized within each code was necessary. In addition, the following principles were used as guidelines: (1) code for as many potential themes/patterns as possible; (2) code extracts of data inclusively, i.e., preserve small sections of the surrounding data when relevant; and (3) code individual extracts of data for as many different “themes” as appropriate [ 36 ]. In the third phase, the two authors analyzed the initial codes, sorted them into potential themes, and debated their meanings and emerging patterns to reach a consensus. This phase, which refocused the analysis on the broader level of themes rather than that of codes, involved sorting the different codes into potential themes. In the fourth stage, reviewing themes ensures that the data supports the themes and allows an iterative process between different levels of abstraction without losing grounding in the raw data. Finally, defining the “essence” of each theme during the development of the main themes by identifying the “story” as consistent with the data and the research question while ensuring that the themes did not overlap but still fit together in the overall “story” of the data. It told the “story” by writing analytical narratives with illustrative quotes.

This study achieved credibility by selecting a heterogeneous sample, performing member checks, and taking field notes [ 37 ]. This study ensured dependability by verifying the findings with the researchers and participants, appropriately numbering the direct quotations (e.g., DN1), and comparing the results with the previous literature. This study established confirmability via audit trails [ 38 ] and the comprehensive reporting of all research processes. This study ensured transferability by describing the data collection process and seeking a heterogeneous sample.

Fourteen participants were interviewed (the demographic information is presented in Table  1 ). The thematic analysis identifies three major themes (Fig.  1 ). These interconnected topics illuminate the growth process and factors influencing nursing professionalism. The first theme, “nourishment factors: promoting early sprouting,” includes personal traits, family upbringing, and professional education at school and emphasizes early factors influencing nursing professionalism. The second theme, “growth factors: the power of self-activation and overcoming challenges,” included self-activation and overcoming difficulties, focusing on the dual attributes of the growth process of nursing professionalism. The final theme, “rootedness factors: stability and upward momentum,” includes an upward atmosphere and external motivation and explores the factors that maintain the stability and sustainability of nursing professionalism.

Factors influencing the development of nursing professionalism

Nourishment factors: promoting early sprouting

Personal traits.

Personal traits are called “nature” [ 23 ]. There exists a close connection between personal traits and professional behavior. When nurses confront patients’ physiological and emotional needs, innate qualities like kindness and compassion predispose them to be more sensitive to patients’ suffering and needs. Nursing professionalism transcends mere task fulfillment; this inner emotional drive compels nurses to fulfill their duties and engage in nursing work out of a genuine desire and sense of responsibility, practicing the nursing mission nobly. Thus, whether individual traits align with the nursing mission profoundly influences the nursing professionalism of nurses in their work.

“At 32, I became a head nurse, full of vitality and boundless enthusiasm, particularly compassion. I have no idea where this compassion comes from.” (ND1) .

Family upbringing

Education begins in the family, and it is through family education that nurses develop an early sense of professionalism. China has a “family culture” that defines the responsibility of family education. The study participants recalled that in childhood, the “living” nature of family education shaped early professionalism, in which the concepts of “kindness” and “altruism” were acquired through interactions with family members.

“My mother was an early childhood educator, and when she told me fairy tales, it was to promote kindness. Loving others and being selfless, you can’t be a bad person. That’s what altruistic education is about.” (ND1) .

The impact of family education on the acquisition of nursing professionalism extends into adulthood. In Chinese Confucianism and collectivism, family members usually have close emotional ties, and this “strong bond” family structure promotes nurses’ understanding and care for others and their ability to be wiser and more caring in the nursing profession. This strong bonding plays a catalytic role in the emergence of nursing professionalism.

“Some nurses are very adept at expressing care, perhaps because grandparents and parents live together. Since childhood, parents have taught them how to express care.” (N4) .

School professional education

Nursing professionalism is further acquired through professional education in schools. Nursing professional education emphasizes respect and care for patients, adherence to social responsibility, and the integration of traditional Chinese oriental medical thought and Western nursing concepts, internalized into behaviors to form the concept of professional nursing spirit. Participants indicated that the virtues of dedication, responsibility, respect, and caring that permeate school professional education are incorporated by nurses into nursing practice.

“The best nursing comes from the heart. When I was administering injections, I thought about how to alleviate the patient’s pain. Later, I learned that if I entered the needle quickly, it would be less painful, so I often practiced in the operating room.” (N8) .

Other participants also shared that they felt positively guided by professional education at school, constructing a comprehensive nursing philosophy system within the educational context. They realized that nursing is a multidisciplinary field encompassing human care, social responsibility, and ethical values.

“University was my most unforgettable learning experience. I studied 36 courses here, including nursing aesthetics, literature, sociology, ethics, education, etc. I realized that the nursing work we engage in has such rich depth! has become an invaluable treasure in my nursing career.” (ND1) .

Growth factors: the power of self-activation and overcoming challenges

Self-activation, professional benefits.

Professional benefit perception refers to the advantages nurses perceive while engaging in nursing work, acknowledging that their involvement in nursing promotes their holistic personal growth [ 39 ]. Consistent with traditional perspectives, this study finds that nurses generate a sense of professional benefit through both “tangible benefits” and “spiritual benefits,” recognizing the value and significance of nursing work, thereby furthering the development of nursing professionalism.

The dynamic updating achieves “tangible benefits.” Nurses require outstanding professional competence and ongoing continuing education. Participants mentioned that nurses utilize their professional knowledge and clinical experience to save patients’ lives, and exceptional professional competence can rekindle their enthusiasm for work. Continuous and dynamic continuing education, supplementing the latest technology and knowledge in the nursing field, can generate positive professional emotions.

“There’s only one doctor on duty at night, and nurses are the first responders when we encounter emergencies. Even before the doctor arrives in the ward, I must act quickly and urgently. Every time I bring a patient back from the brink of death, I feel excited throughout the night.” (N6) . “Experience is und oubtedly important. I’ve been working for over a decade, and I undergo training every year. No one likes stagnation; we can forge ahead only by continually moving forward.” (NM3) .

Self-worth realization through “spiritual benefits.” Experiencing a sense of value in nursing practice provides nurses with positive reinforcement, enhancing nursing professionalism behavior. Moreover, as healthcare practitioners, the ability of relatives and family members to benefit from it distinguishes Chinese nurses’ unique approach to self-worth realization from nurses in other countries. This unexpected feedback, whether in material or spiritual forms, enables nurses to fulfill their sense of worth.

“Sometimes, friends and relatives ask me about hospitalization-related questions, and I am more than willing to help them.” (N2) . “ I changed my mother’s gastric tube without any complications.” (NM3) .

Professional identity

Nursing professional identity refers to nurses acknowledging their work and affirming their self-worth [ 40 ]. This study defines professional identity as a gradual “process” and a “state.”

One participant mentioned that professional identity is a psychological “process” that nurses develop and confirm their professional roles through their personal experiences. It is closely related to the individual experiences of nurses. Nurses’ gradual recognition of their work prompts them to progress and develop a positive work attitude and professionalism.

“Gradually, I discovered that being a nurse makes me realize my significance, which keeps me moving forward, time and time again.” (ND2) .

Simultaneously, as a “state,” professional identity represents the degree to which nurses identify with the nursing profession. This “state” of professional identity reflects nursing professionalism’s long-term accumulation and formation. It indicates nurses’ long-standing dedication and emotional involvement in nursing, leading to higher professional competence and a sense of responsibility in their work.

“It’s not just a job to make a living; it’s about wholeheartedly identifying with this profession, unleashing one’s potential, which results in better professional conduct.”(N5) .

Overcoming challenges

Balancing roles.

Balancing roles refers to the equilibrium individuals establish between their roles in the nursing profession, family, and organization. Nursing professional roles are inherently multifaceted, and when faced with multiple responsibilities, such as family demands and organizational tasks, nurses must balance these roles. The tension and complexity between personal and organizational roles can potentially inhibit their emotions and professional motivation. However, in China, families are tightly knit, and strong family support can help reconcile this tension.

“To be a good nursing department manager, you need strong family support. The commitment to one’s career and the dedication to family don’t always align. For instance, my job keeps me busy regarding family matters, and I have limited time to care for my children. My parents-in-law take care of them more. I do rounds every Sunday, and the phone never stops ringing, even on my days off. There’s no way around it; this is the role I’ve taken on. Family support allows me to work with peace of mind.” (ND3) .

Adaptation organization

Nurses also face challenges in adapting to organizational systems. These adaptability challenges include rapidly learning new technologies, processes, and the culture of practice in different departments. This “unfamiliarity” impedes the manifestation of nursing professionalism. Participants indicated that the inability to adapt to clinical work quickly affects new graduate nurses’ transition into practice. Initially, there is a “honeymoon period” when becoming a registered nurse, but as actual capabilities do not align with expected performance, the excitement gradually wanes.

“I didn’t know the routine procedures in ophthalmology, I couldn’t measure eye pressure, and I didn’t know how to perform eye injections. I was terrified, which brought various challenges when I started working.” (N4) .

Furthermore, nurses must adapt to the practice culture of “this is how things are done” and “it’s always been done this way” in their workplace. Due to the promotion and title system requirements in Chinese hospitals, nurses with several years of experience often need to rotate through departments such as Intensive Care Unit and emergency for a period. The differences in operations and management between different departments also frustrate these nurses during rotations. However, a certain social prestige is attached, making it challenging for the nurses from the original department to provide direct guidance to the rotating nurses, leading to isolation for the latter in new departments.

“A blank slate regarding the department’s hierarchy, administrative procedures, and so on.” (N3) . “Although there’s a set of procedures, mostly similar, it’s the slight differences that always set me apart.” (N6) .

Rootedness factors: stability and upward momentum

Upward atmosphere, peer support.

Peer support has a positive impact on nursing professionalism. Peers are individuals of the same age group who have formed a connection due to shared experiences in similar socio-cultural environments, with emotional support, mutual assistance, and understanding constituting the core elements of peer support [ 41 ]. Firstly, nursing work often involves highly stressful situations, including heavy workloads, complex patient conditions, and urgent medical cases. Peer support provides emotional support, allowing nurses to find comfort and encouragement when facing stress and difficulties. Secondly, peer support cultivates a positive work atmosphere and team spirit. In a mutually supportive, trusting, and cooperative team, nurses are more likely to experience a sense of accomplishment in their work. They feel they are not isolated but part of a united and collaborative whole. Furthermore, peer support also promotes professional development and knowledge exchange among nurses. In an open and supportive team environment, nurses are more willing to share their experiences and knowledge, learn from each other, and grow.

“The spirit influences the spirit, especially those of my age group who have left a deep impression on me with their admirable qualities in their work. It makes me reflect on my shortcomings in my work and constantly strive to improve and adjust myself.” (N2) .

Intergenerational role models

Inter-generational refers to the relationships between generations [ 42 ]. In nursing practice, inter-generational relationships exist, such as those among nurses of different ages and levels of experience. This study’s inter-generational role models include managerial role models and senior nurses.

Participants believe that managers’ professionalism influences subordinate nurses’ attitudes and performance. The professionalism of managers not only plays a guiding and leadership role in daily work but, more importantly, sets an example, inspiring and encouraging subordinate nurses who are willing to follow and inherit professionalism.

“The department’s leadership has a significant impact on professionalism. When managers have a strong sense of professionalism, the nurses they oversee follow suit. Because leadership represents the management level and higher things, it’s difficult for things at the bottom to go well if it’s not well-controlled at the top.” (N8) .

On the other hand, senior nurses, as role models within the nursing generation, also significantly impact the upward development of professionalism. Senior nurses’ rich experience and professional competence guide new nurses to maintain a rigorous attitude at work. New nurses often draw from and learn senior nurses’ work attitudes and behaviors, catalyzing the elevation of nursing professionalism.

“Senior nurses have a role model effect because new nurses learn from the older ones. If senior nurses work rigorously and new nurses make mistakes or lack a sense of dedication, they will immediately point it out. Over time, you also become more rigorous.” (NM3) .

Perceived professional respect

Societal respect for nursing work creates an atmosphere of care and emphasis on nursing. Nurses within this atmosphere become aware of the importance of nursing work and the profound significance of patient care. They are inclined to exhibit positive nursing professionalism behaviors to meet the expectations of society and the general public.

“The nursing industry has experienced the COVID-19 pandemic, and during the anti-epidemic efforts, nurses were at the forefront, risking their lives to care for patients, receiving acclaim from patients, doctors, and the public.” (N2) .

Professional respect is the manifestation of nurses’ self-acknowledgment of nursing values. It is more than an external acknowledgment; it is an internal affirmation. This mutual respect aligns nurses’ professional and societal worth, catalyzing increased potential and motivation.

External motivation

The stability of nursing professionalism relies on external resources, including the diverse support from nursing managers and the guidance of national healthcare policies. Nursing managers are the frontline leaders who interact with nurses, and their support serves as a management tool and a direct means to sustain nursing professionalism. This multifaceted support encompasses economic incentives such as compensation and reward mechanisms. It extends to non-material motivations such as career advancement opportunities, adequate staffing, modern equipment provision, and fair and equitable treatment form crucial aspects of managerial support. Providing nurses with stable external support creates a space to focus on their professional mission and responsibilities, thus maintaining the stability of nursing professionalism.

“Economic foundation determines the superstructure(spiritual world)).” (NM1) .

Furthermore, the guidance of national healthcare policies serves as a beacon for the development of the nursing profession. At the national level, healthcare policies can regulate the organization and operation of healthcare systems and services, providing nurses with a more stable and favorable working environment. This environment allows nurses to fulfill their professional roles better and maximize their value. The environmental changes brought about by policy guidance offer nurses more favorable professional conditions, effectively promoting the upward development of nursing professionalism.

“Government documents summarize the needs of our society, and nursing will continue to improve in the direction of policy guidance.” (NM3) .

Discussions

This study provides insights for understanding the factors that influence the development of nursing professionalism. We emphasize the themes of early nourishment factors that promote the emergence of nursing professionalism, growth factors associated with self-activation and overcoming challenges, and rootedness factors that stabilize upward, which reveal the dynamic factors that influence the development of nursing professionalism.

We added the early influence of personality traits, family upbringing, and school professional education in the development of nursing professionalism, which is similar to the pathway through which nurses’ foundational values are acquired [ 43 , 44 ]. Building on previous research, we highlight the sequential order of socialization in family education and school professional education, with individual socialization within the family achieving individual socialization before school professional education, emphasizing the importance of intergenerational family transmission on the development of nursing professionalism [ 45 ]. Education commences within the family, a social organization with an educational function. China values its “family culture” and emphasizes defining parental responsibilities for family education based on blood relations. It is a common folk law in China that parents are regarded as the first teachers. In addition, Chinese society promotes Confucianism, which emphasizes instilling the concept of “self-improvement” through “educational living” [ 46 ], as mentioned in our study, the interpersonal interactions such as “altruism” and “caring” arising from family interactions can help nurses establish a deeper emotional connection with their patients. Therefore, future consideration could be given to incorporating programs that foster culture and emotions into professional education. Similar studies are necessary in East Asian countries and other countries with similar cultures to broaden the results of factors influencing nursing professionalism.

The growth of nursing professionalism requires real work scenarios. Our results present the dual factors of nursing professionalism upon entering the workplace. Regarding self-activation factors, we delve into the significance of “professional identity” and, for the first time from the perspective of Chinese collectivism, explain the unique influence of “professional benefits” on nursing professionalism. Our study aligns with previous research, viewing professional identity as an ongoing “process” [ 47 ]. By developing a professional identity, nurses can exhibit “stateful” self-satisfaction and self-motivation, contributing to their job satisfaction and professionalism [ 48 ]. The “professional benefits” involve integrating rational and emotional aspects. The “tangible benefits” of professionalism and technical competence at work lead to positive experiences and emotions among nurses. Nurses voluntarily invest more passion and energy in their work [ 49 ]. In addition, what sets our results apart is how Chinese nurses obtain ‘spiritual benefits,’ which come from the convenience of medical access that their relatives enjoy due to their work. Some studies have shown that “spiritual benefits” are more apparent among nurses aged 40 and above and those with higher professional titles [ 50 ]. The accumulation of clinical experience and the harmonious interpersonal relationships achieved through medical collaboration can help family members access reliable medical resources, leading to greater professional gain. This phenomenon is closely related to the collective consciousness of Chinese nurses, revealing that people are not always “self-interested and rational”; their behavior is influenced by more complex factors such as intuition, emotions, and attitudes [ 49 ].

In terms of the challenges faced, on the one hand, we emphasized the supportive role of intergenerational relationships in nurses’ work-family conflicts. Previous studies have shown that Chinese nurses perceive nursing work as a means to fulfill family responsibilities rather than the ultimate goal, reflecting a prioritization of family over work [ 51 ]. Consequently, nurses are more likely to resign during work-family conflicts, reallocating their resources from work to family [ 52 ]. Compared with previous studies, we found that China is a highly connected society, and multi-generational households are relatively common [ 53 ]. Hence, the importance of maintaining good intergenerational relationships cannot be ignored in Chinese society and culture, substantially impacting nursing professionalism. On the other hand, we reveal the underlying reasons for the restricted development of nursing professionalism among nurses during the transition period. Newly graduated nurses face negative experiences such as incompetence, lack of preparation, exhaustion, and disappointment in their work, hindering the development of nursing professionalism, which is especially evident in departments such as obstetrics and gynecology, ophthalmology, and emergency, where teaching hours for these specialties fall significantly below those for general internal medicine and surgical nursing [ 54 ]. The educational experiences of nurses are insufficient to meet clinical demands [ 55 ]. Moreover, this is compounded by differences in the structure and content of the 12–24 month “standardized training” for new nurses that has already begun in most cities in China, further exacerbating the experience of separation of new nurses from their organizations [ 56 ]. The development of rotational nurses is often neglected, and transfer systems are a mere formality [ 57 ]. Therefore, developing nursing adaptability and creating a supportive work environment should be incorporated into the content and structure of different organizational transition programs to make a positive work environment and promote nurses’ engagement, enhancing nursing professionalism.

It is worth noting that the rootedness factor involves individual, organizational, and societal dimensions. At the personal level, peer support and intergenerational role models integrate the demonstration of actual “peers” and “role models” with nurses’ self-awareness and agency to achieve upward mobility in nursing professionalism [ 58 ]. However, while peer support offers emotional and social cognitive consistency based on age, background, and learning experiences, it may lack experiential depth [ 59 ]. In contrast, intergenerational role models involving a “superior-subordinate” relationship can initially lead to “nurturing” relationships, potentially leading to lateral violence and bullying [ 60 ]. At the organizational level, our findings highlight that professional respect in the workplace is more relevant to nurses’ professionalism than social appraisal. Professional respect is the nurses’ perception of their subjective social status within the profession and an analysis of the social value associated with the nursing profession [ 61 ]. However, nurses are not always respected, especially as insults and disregard from patients, superiors, or physicians can lead to negative emotions, professional burnout, and a desire to quit [ 62 , 63 , 64 ]. Regarding the societal dimension, providing external motivation tailored to nurses’ specific backgrounds and needs is beneficial for the stable development of nursing professionalism. Financial incentives are often considered a common strategy to improve nurses’ motivation and retention in motivation management [ 65 ]. However, the effectiveness of incentives is, more importantly, dependent on the response of nurses after implementation, and it is crucial to understand the needs and preferences of nurses in terms of incentives as well as the level of nurses’ participation in policy development, in addition to material rewards [ 66 , 67 ].Therefore, maintaining the stability of nursing professionalism is therefore complex, and nursing managers should consider ways to deepen peer support and reduce workplace bullying through “intergenerational parenting”, and should develop policies that support nurses, have zero-tolerance for disruptive behaviours, uphold the professional dignity of nurses, and ensure that their voices are heard and valued, which contributes to a more positive, fulfilling, and motivating nursing work environment.

Limitations

Given the persistently low number of men in nursing, all participants recruited for our study were female. However, considering the relatively narrow focus of the research, The purposive variation, and the richness of the generated data, the sample size was deemed sufficient to achieve our objectives. In addition, although the study results reveal dynamic influences on the development of nursing professionalism, they do not differentiate between nurses at different career stages, such as novice and expert nurses. We consider these factors as “common characteristics” for them, intertwined with each other, which can be further clarified in future research.

Conclusions

This study is an important addition to previous research in that we reveal the dynamics of factors that influence the development of nursing professionalism, including the “nourishment factor,” “growth factor,” and “rootedness factor.” Our findings provide contextual factors that can be changed during the development of nursing professionalism and lay the foundation for future strategies to foster nursing professionalism.

Relevance to clinical practice

The findings of this study have important implications for exploring the development of nursing professionalism. Nursing managers can support nurses’ professionalism from various perspectives, depending on the stage of the nurse’s life, such as valuing nurses’ family relationships, focusing on nurses in transition, listening to nurses’ voices, and creating a “magnetic nursing” work environment. These measures will not only positively impact the careers of individual nurses but will also help improve the standard and quality of health care in general. In the future, we should no longer view the development of nursing professionalism as solely the responsibility of individual nurses; the influence of family, organizations, and society is indispensable in collectively promoting the development of nurses’ nursing professionalism.

Data availability

Data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

The Hall Professionalism Inventory

Miller’s Wheel of Professionalism in Nursing

SHwang’s Nurse Professional Values Scale

The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research

Xiu-Yin Y, Jun-Cui R, Fang W, Nursing DJJN. Effects of Management Mode of Nursing Talent Pools on Nurse’s Professional Identity and Turnover Rate. 2018.

Meihuan X, Xiaoling F, Junyi C, Xiaowei F, Nursing DOJJNS. Impact of the two-child policy on nursing human resource management:aqualitative study. 2018.

Jang YK, Kyunghee. Professionalism and professional quality of life for oncology nurses. J Clin Nurs 2016, 25(19a20).

Marcinowicz L, Shpakou A, Piatrou S, Fejfer-Wirbal E, Dudzik A, Kalinowska P, Palubinskaya S, Wojnar D. Behavioural categories of professionalism of nurses in Poland and Belarus: a comparative survey. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(9–10):1635–42.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

State of the world’. s nursing report [ https://www.who.int/publications-detail/nursing-report ].

Cao H, Song Y, Wu Y, Du Y, He X, Chen Y, Wang Q, Yang H. What is nursing professionalism? A concept analysis. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):34.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Rabie T. Relation between Halls’ professionalism scale and nurses’ demographic characteristics. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):258.

Shen Y, Xie W, Wang X, Qu J, Zhou T, Li Y, Mao X, Hou P, Liu Y. Impact of innovative education on the professionalism of undergraduate nursing students in China. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;98:104647.

Abedin S, Khademi Z, Kamalzadeh H, Beigi Broujeni R. Characteristics of a good nurse as perceived by nurses. Nurs Ethics 2023:9697330221147895.

Xianting JU, Xiaoju F, Medicine SOJCME. The Influence of the Trinity SystemTalent Training Mode on the Professionalism of Nurses. 2018.

Kim HJ, Park D. Effects of nursing professionalism and self-efficacy on job embeddedness in nurses. Heliyon. 2023;9(6):e16991.

Park BM, Jung JJIJER, Health P. Effects of the Resilience of nurses in Long-Term Care hospitals during on job stress COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating effects of nursing professionalism. 2021, 18(19):10327-.

Ghadirian. Fataneh, Salsali, Mahvash, Cheraghi, Mohammad, Nursing AJIJo, Research M: Nursing professionalism: An evolutionary concept analysis. 2014.

Huang Y, He X, Pan H. Discussion on professionalism of a nurse. Chin J Nurs Educ 2010(9):3.

Tanaka M, Taketomi K, Yonemitsu Y, Kawamoto R. Professional behaviours and factors contributing to nursing professionalism among nurse managers. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2016;24(1):12–20.

Article   Google Scholar  

Ghadirian F, Salsali M, Cheraghi MA. Nursing professionalism: an evolutionary concept analysis. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014;19(1):1–10.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Miller BK, Adams D, Beck LJAJ. Nursing Professionalism: A behavioral inventory for professionalism in nursing. 1994, 59(2):290–295.

Adams D, Miller BKJJPN. Professionalism in nursing behaviors of nurse practitioners. 2001, 17(4):203–210.

Hwang JI, Lou F, Han SS, Cao F, Li PJINR. Professionalism: the major factor influencing job satisfaction among Korean and Chinese nurses. 2010, 56(3):313–8.

Aregay A, Demessie A, Gebrekidan K, Abyu GJBN. A Cross Sectional Study On Factors Influencing Professionalism In Nursing Among Nurses In Mekelle Public Hospitals, North Ethiopia, 2012. 2014.

Ham YS, Kim HSJJKAFN. Comparison of factors affecting nursing professionalism perceived by nursing students anticipating graduation according to nursing Educational System. 2012, 19(3).

Tanaka M, Taketomi K, Yonemitsu Y, Kawamoto RJJNM. Professional behaviours and factors contributing to nursing professionalism among nurse managers. 2016, 24(1):12–20.

Pareek B, Batra K. Factors influencing professionalism among nurse educators: a qualitative study. J Educ Health Promotion. 2022;11:292.

Mcilveen P, Patton WJIJE, Guidance V. A critical reflection on Career Development. 2006, 6(1):15–27.

Gao R. Focusing on the Research Prospect of nurses’ professionalism from the General Research of Professionalism. Communication Vocat Educ. 2019;21:30–4.

Google Scholar  

Stannard DJaj: Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 2012, 95(2):0-308.

Colorafi KJ, Evans B. Qualitative descriptive methods in Health Science Research. Herd. 2016;9(4):16–25.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health care: J Int Soc Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

Circular on the issuance of the Action Plan for Further Improvement of Nursing Services. (2023–2025). [ https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202306/content_6887303.shtml ].

Circular on the Issuance of the Training Programme for Newly Enrolled Nurses (for Trial, Implementation.). [ http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s3593/201602/91b5a8fa3c9a45859b036558a5073875.html ].

Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J. Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:52.

Guo X, Xiong L, Wang Y, Li X, Wang Y, Xiao F, He J, Xiang Y, Xu C. Chinese nurses’ perceptions on toxic leadership behaviours of nurse managers: a qualitative study. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2022;30(7):3256–63.

Kelly SE. Qualitative Interviewing Techniques and Styles. In: 2010 ; 2010.

Braun V, Clarke V. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. 2013.

Ma D, Zhu X, Dong Y, He M, Meng X, Zhao Y, Ye Y, Sun J. It is my turn to raise her’ - decision-making regarding physical restraint in home care in China: a descriptive qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022;134:104315.

Lincoln YS, Guba EG, Pilotta JJ. Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth). International Journal of Intercultural Relations 1985, 9(4):438–439.

Cutcliffe JR, McKenna HP. Expert qualitative researchers and the use of audit trails. J Adv Nurs. 2004;45(2):126–33. discussion 134 – 125.

Zhou H, Zhu Y, Zhang X, Peng J, Li Q, Wang X, Wang L, Cai X, Lan L. Psychological capital and Perceived Professional benefits: testing the Mediating role of perceived nursing work environment among Chinese nurses. J PsychoSoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2018;56(4):38–47.

Xu H, Xue M, Takashi E, Kitayama A, Zhu P, Liu Y. Exploring the relationship between lateral violence and nursing professionalism through the mediating effect of professional identity: a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Nurs open. 2023;10(5):3113–21.

Geyer LT, Cunningham T, Rastorguieva K, Ritenour CWM. An Abundance Mindset Approach to Support Nurse Well-Being: the feasibility of peer support. Nurse Lead 2023.

Che W. Encyclopaedia of Psychological Counselling. Zhejiang Science and Technology Publishing; 2001.

Sastrawan S, Weller-Newton J, Brand G, Malik GJNE. The development of nurses’ foundational values. 2021, 28(7–8):1244–57.

Abedin S, Khademi Z, Kamalzadeh H, Beigi Broujeni R. Characteristics of a good nurse as perceived by nurses. Nurs Ethics. 2024;31(1):79–88.

Hong M. The Basic traits of Family Education:three metaphors of Family Education. Educ Res Monthly 2023(04):90–8.

Zhang Z, Liu L. Establishing the Professional Role of parents in Family Education - the significance of the legislation on the Family Education Promotion Act. People’s Educ 2021(22):35–8.

Fitzgerald AJNF. Professional identity: A concept analysis. 2020(1).

Sheng Q, Zhang X, Wang X, Cai CJJ. The influence of experiences of involvement in the COVID-19 rescue task on the professional identity among Chinese nurses: a qualitative study. 2020(7):28.

Zhang B, Tao H, Xie M, Zhang J, Zhang M, Zhang Y. Factors associated with professional identity among ICU nurses during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. Nurs open. 2023;10(8):5701–10.

Zhan T, Li H, Ding XJJNM. Can social support enhance sense of coherence and perceived professional benefits among Chinese registered nurses? A mediation model. 2019, 28(3).

Redding G. The Nature of Individual Attachment to the Organization: A Review of East Asian Variations. 1994.

Liu X, Yuan SJ, Ji TT, Song YL. Relationship between risk perception of COVID-19 and job withdrawal among Chinese nurses: the effect of work-family conflict and job autonomy. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2022;30(6):1931–9.

Hu W, Sze Y, Chen H, Fang XJCP. Actor–Partner analyses of the relationship between family-of-origin triangulation and marital satisfaction in Chinese couples. 2007, 24(7):2135–46.

Baharum H, Ismail A, McKenna L, Mohamed Z, Ibrahim R, Hassan NH. Success factors in adaptation of newly graduated nurses: a scoping review. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):125.

Shu’e, Zhang C, Ma, Dexin, Meng Y, Shi, Fengzhe, Open XJB. Impact of workplace incivility in hospitals on the work ability, career expectations and job performance of Chinese nurses: a cross-sectional survey. 2018.

Ma W, He Y, Zhao W, Xu R, Liang TJJNM. Developing and validating the transition status scale for newly graduated nurses in China. 2021.

Innes T, Calleja P. Transition support for new graduate and novice nurses in critical care settings: an integrative review of the literature. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018;30:62–72.

Liu P, Lou X, Wang Y, Hao Y, Song Y, Xu X. Exploration of the Integrated Management Mode of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus based on Social Learning Theory. Med Philosophy(B). 2017;38(07):87–90.

Tai HM, Haines TP, Canny BJ, Molloy EKJJPL. A study of medical students’ peer learning on clinical placements: What they have taught themselves to do. 2014(1).

Anderson LB, Morgan MJCQ. An Examination of Nurses’ Intergenerational Communicative Experiences in the Workplace. Do Nurses Eat Their Young? 2016:1–25.

Shi X, Li Y, Zhang C. Correlation among job-esteem,job burnout and turnover intention in nurses employee turnover. Chin Nurs Res. 2021;35(15):2654–60.

Fereshteh N, Masoud F-K et al. Fazlollah, Ahmadi, Asghar, Dalvandi, Mehdi, Nursing RJ : Human dignity and professional reputation under threat: Iranian Nurses’ experiences of workplace violence. 2016.

Arnetz J, Hamblin LE, Sudan. Sukhesh, Occupational BJJo, Medicine. Organizational Determinants of Workplace Violence Against Hospital Workers; 2018.

Bambi S, Guazzini A, Felippis CD, Lucchini A. Rasero LJAb-mAP: preventing workplace incivility, lateral violence and bullying between nurses. A narrative literature review. 2017, 88(5-S):39–47.

Ditlopo P, Blaauw D, Rispel L, Thomas S, Bidwell PJGHA. Policy implementation and financial incentives for nurses in South Africa: a case study on the occupation-specific dispensation. 2013, 6(1):138–46.

Okyere E, Ward PR, Marfoh K, Mwanri L. Incentives management among health workers in primary health-care facilities: addressing important issues in rural Ghana. Journal of health organization and management 2022, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).

Rasheed SP, Younas A, Mehdi F. Challenges, extent of involvement, and the impact of nurses’ involvement in politics and policy making in in last two decades: an integrative review. J Nurs Scholarship: Official Publication Sigma Theta Tau Int Honor Soc Nurs. 2020;52(4):446–55.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all participating nurses.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China

Xingyue He, Ya Mao, Linbo Li, Yanming Wu & Hui Yang

Department of Nursing, Linfen Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University (Linfen People’s Hospital), Linfen, 041000, China

Department of Nursing, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

XYH, YM, and HLC were responsible for the study’s inception, study design, and data collection. All authors analyzed the data. XYH wrote the first draft of the manuscript, LBL, YMW, and HY reviewed the manuscript, and HY finalized the final version. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Yang .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of the declaration of Helsinki (ethical approval and consent to participate). The aims and methods of the project were explained to all participants, and necessary assurance was given to them about the anonymity and confidentiality of their information and audio files. Informed consent was taken from all participants. The participants had the right to withdraw from the study during or at any other time. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (Ref. 201811049RIND).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

He, X., Mao, Y., Cao, H. et al. Factors influencing the development of nursing professionalism: a descriptive qualitative study. BMC Nurs 23 , 283 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01945-6

Download citation

Received : 03 March 2024

Accepted : 17 April 2024

Published : 26 April 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01945-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Nursing professionalism
• Thematic analysis
• Qualitative study

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

• General enquiries: [email protected]