management letter vs management representation letter

What is a Management Representation Letter?

Getting through financial audits can be frustrating for companies, especially when asked to provide management representation letters.

This article will clarify exactly what a management representation letter is, why auditors request them, what should be included, and provide examples to make the process smooth and compliant.

You'll learn the purpose of these letters, see template examples, understand international audit standards, and gain key takeaways to improve financial reporting at your organization.

Introduction to Management Representation Letters

A management representation letter is a formal document signed by a company's senior management that is provided to external auditors. It contains certain written representations that auditors require in order to complete an audit and form an opinion on the company's financial statements.

Defining the Management Representation Letter in Audit Context

The management representation letter serves an important role within the financial statement audit process. Auditors use it as audit evidence to support their assessment of whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Specifically, auditors request written confirmation from management regarding the accuracy and completeness of information provided during the audit. This includes representations related to:

• The financial statements and adequacy of disclosures
• Proper recording of transactions and account balances
• Internal controls over financial reporting
• Compliance with laws and regulations

By obtaining these written representations from management, auditors gain additional audit evidence to complete their testing and analysis. The management representation letter also outlines management's responsibilities under the audit engagement.

Essential Components of a Management Representation Letter

A standard management representation letter contains certain key statements that auditors rely upon. These include:

• Financial statement disclosures : Confirmation that management has provided the auditors with all relevant information and access needed to perform the audit.
• Recognition, measurement and disclosure : Assertion that the financial statements comply with the applicable financial reporting framework and standards.
• Non-compliance : Disclosure of any non-compliance with laws and regulations.
• Litigation and claims : Details of any actual, pending or threatened litigation and claims that could impact the financial statements.

The letter will also typically list areas of significant estimates and judgments made by management in preparing the financial statements. For example, allowances for doubtful accounts, asset impairment assessments, and assumptions used in valuation models.

By obtaining written representation on these matters, auditors gain evidence to issue their audit opinion. The management representation letter should be signed by the CEO and CFO or equivalent members of senior management.

Legal and Ethical Implications of Management Representations

Signing a management representation letter has legal and ethical implications. Management must ensure representations made to the auditors are accurate and made in good faith. Intentionally misrepresenting information or omitting relevant details could constitute fraud and result in legal liability.

Auditors also have a duty to assess the reasonableness of management representations and corroborate them with other audit evidence. Relying solely on management representations without further verification could call into question the quality of the audit.

Overall, the management representation letter facilitates open and transparent communication between management and auditors. It serves as a legally binding confirmation of management's fulfillment of its financial reporting responsibilities.

What is the main purpose of a management representation letter?

The main purpose of a management representation letter is to obtain written confirmation from management that they have fulfilled their responsibility for the fair presentation of the financial statements. This letter documents that management has provided the auditors with all relevant information and access needed to conduct the audit.

Some key purposes of the management representation letter include:

Confirming management's responsibility for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework (e.g. GAAP or IFRS).

Affirming that management has provided the auditors with all relevant information and access to records, documentation and personnel that is necessary for the audit.

Disclosing any instances of fraud involving management, employees with significant internal control roles, or those that cause a material misstatement of the financial statements.

Presenting details on matters that impact the financial statements - such as plans or intentions that may affect asset/liability carrying values, information about related parties, contingencies, subsequent events, etc.

Stating that all transactions have been recorded and are reflected in the financial statements. This helps confirm completeness and cut-off assertions.

So in summary, the management representation letter serves as important audit evidence that validates information provided by management to the auditors. It also formally documents management's responsibilities and representations concerning the financial statements.

What is the meaning of management representation?

Management representation refers to written confirmation provided by management of an entity to the auditors regarding the accuracy and completeness of financial statements and adequacy of internal controls.

The management representation letter is a key audit evidence prepared at the completion of the audit process. It contains management's assertions regarding:

• Fair presentation of financial statements
• Completeness of information provided to auditors
• Proper accounting policies used
• Reasonableness of significant estimates made

Essentially, through this letter, management takes responsibility for the fair presentation of the financial statements. They confirm to the auditors that they have fulfilled their financial reporting responsibilities.

The management representation letter covers all periods encompassed by the audit report and is dated the same date as the completion of audit fieldwork. It is addressed to the engagement partner and signed by those with appropriate responsibilities for the financial statements, usually the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

By obtaining written representations from management, the auditors demonstrate they have obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support their audit opinion. The representations serve as necessary supplementary corroboration of management's oral assertions made during the audit.

In summary, the management representation letter is a written statement from management provided to the auditors as part of the audit evidence. It confirms management's compliance with financial reporting responsibilities to enable auditors to form their audit opinion.

What is an example of a management representation letter?

We are providing this letter in connection with your audit of the cost representation statement of USAID resources managed by (Client Name) under Contract No. XXX “Project Name” for the period MM/DD/YY to MM/DD/YY.

We confirm, to the best of our knowledge and belief, the following representations made to you during your audit:

• We have made available to you all financial records and related data, including service auditor reports.
• There have been no communications from regulatory agencies concerning noncompliance with or deficiencies on financial reporting practices.
• We have no knowledge of any known or suspected fraudulent financial reporting or misappropriation of assets involving management or employees with significant roles in internal control.
• We have disclosed to you the results of our assessment of risk that the cost representation statement may be materially misstated as a result of fraud.
• There are no material transactions that have not been properly recorded in the accounting records.
• We believe the effects of any uncorrected financial statement misstatements aggregated by you are immaterial.
• We have disclosed all liabilities, both actual and contingent.
• There are no violations or possible violations of laws or regulations whose effects should be considered.

We confirm that the representations we have made to you during your audit are complete, truthful, and accurate.

Sincerely, [Signature] [Client Representative Name and Title]

What is the difference between management letter and management representation letter?

The key differences between a management letter and a management representation letter in an audit are:

Focus : The management letter focuses on identifying weaknesses and areas of improvement in the company's financial reporting process and internal controls. Management representation, on the other hand, focuses on providing evidence of management's understanding and support of the audit process.

Purpose : The purpose of a management letter is to communicate deficiencies in internal control and make suggestions for improvements. The purpose of a management representation letter is to confirm certain information that the auditors have requested from management.

Content : A management letter contains comments and recommendations from the auditor about issues encountered during the audit. A management representation letter contains specific statements by management regarding matters such as the fairness of financial statements.

Timing : A management letter is typically issued after the audit report while a management representation letter is obtained during the audit.

In summary, while both letters relate to the audit process, the management letter aims to provide suggestions for improvement while the management representation letter serves as audit evidence regarding management's assertions. The management representation letter supports the audit by confirming the accuracy of the financial statements.

sbb-itb-beb59a9

The purpose and importance of management representation letters.

Management representation letters serve several key purposes in the audit process. Most importantly, they provide additional audit evidence to support the auditor's opinion on the financial statements.

Reinforcing the Auditor's Collection of Audit Evidences

Management representation letters reinforce the audit evidence the auditor has already obtained throughout the audit. As outlined in ISA 500 Audit Evidence, auditors must obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to support their opinion. The letter serves as written representation from management on important assertions related to the financial statements. This includes the completeness and accuracy of information provided to the auditor.

Management's Accountability for Financial Reporting

Additionally, the letter highlights management's responsibilities over financial reporting. Management, not the auditor, is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements. The representation letter formally documents that management has fulfilled these duties, a key assertion needed to issue an audit opinion.

Assurance on Contingent and Off-Balance-Sheet Liabilities

Auditors also rely on management's representations on significant estimates and disclosures. This includes assurance from management that the financial statements appropriately reflect contingent liabilities and off-balance-sheet liabilities in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.

In summary, representation letters serve as a final confirmation from management that they have fulfilled their financial reporting responsibilities. The letters provide key audit evidence and accountability to support the auditor's work in accordance with auditing standards.

Drafting a Management Representation Letter: Best Practices

A management representation letter is an important part of the audit process. It documents certain written representations made by management to the auditors regarding the company's financial statements.

Drafting an effective management representation letter requires following several best practices:

Management Representation Letter Template: A Starting Point

When creating a management representation letter, it's best to start with a template. This ensures all relevant topics are covered such as:

• Management's responsibility for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements
• Availability of all financial records and related data
• Completeness of information provided regarding transactions and events
• Disclosure of all liabilities, both actual and contingent
• Non-existence of any fraud or illegal acts

Tailor the template to the specific circumstances and transactions of the business. But the template establishes a solid foundation.

Who Should Sign the Management Representation Letter

Typically the management representation letter should be signed by:

• The CEO or Managing Director
• The CFO or Financial Controller

This demonstrates the company's overall governance has reviewed the representations and attests to their validity and completeness.

In some cases, representation from heads of divisions or departments may also be necessary regarding transactions or activities under their specific purview.

Customizing Representations to Reflect Unique Organizational Circumstances

While a template is useful, each management representation letter must be customized to reflect the distinct transactions and activities of the organization. Specifically call out areas the auditors have highlighted as potential risks or requiring further representations.

For example, if the company underwent a major acquisition, restructuring, or system implementation, representations would be needed to address the associated impacts and risks regarding financial reporting.

The management representation letter is not a mere formality. It serves as an indispensable record of the critical dialogue between management and auditors. Following these best practices helps craft letters that clearly communicate important representations.

Management Representation Letter Samples and Examples

Management representation letters are important documents in the financial audit process. They contain written confirmation from management about the accuracy and completeness of financial statements and disclosures. Reviewing examples can help companies understand what to include in their own letters.

Analyzing a Management Representation Letter Sample

Here is an excerpt from a sample management representation letter:

We acknowledge our responsibility for the fair presentation in the financial statements of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We have provided you with unrestricted access to persons within the Company...

This excerpt demonstrates several key elements:

• Acknowledgment of management's responsibility for financial statements conforming to GAAP
• Confirmation that auditors had full access to people and information

Other standard inclusions are statements around contingent liabilities, litigation matters, plans or intentions that may affect assets or liabilities, and confirmation that appropriate disclosures have been made.

Analyzing examples helps identify customary terms to include.

Management Representation Letter PDF: Accessibility and Format

Management representation letters are often provided to auditors as PDF files. This locked, uneditable format:

• Facilitates easy sharing of the definitive final version
• Allows clear version control with digital signatures
• Enables reliable long-term archival storage

PDF format removes ambiguity around which representation letter version was relied upon.

Real-World Examples: Complex Issues

Consider these excerpts from real-world representation letters:

"The restructuring provision of $20 million represents our best estimate of costs to complete the plant closure based on current plans..."

"We confirm that we have properly recorded and disclosed the acquisition of Company XYZ in the financial statements..."

These excerpts demonstrate how companies transparently address complex real situations like restructurings or major transactions in the representation letter.

Real examples provide assurance that the company has appropriately considered complex accounting matters.

Comparing Management Letters and Management Representation Letters

Management letters and management representation letters serve important but distinct purposes in the audit process.

Management Letter vs Management Representation Letter: Clarifying the Distinction

A management letter communicates deficiencies or recommendations for improvement identified by the auditor during the audit. These may relate to internal controls, processes, or compliance issues that could be made more effective.

In contrast, a management representation letter obtained near the end of an audit contains specific written representations from management about the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements and disclosures. Common representations confirm that:

• Financial statements are fairly presented
• Significant assumptions used by management are reasonable
• All relevant information has been provided to the auditor
• There are no undisclosed side agreements or contingencies

While management letters offer suggestions, representation letters confirm critical facts underlying the audit.

The Role of the Auditor in Relation to Management Representations

Auditors use both tools to fulfill their responsibilities:

Management letters reflect the auditor's duty to communicate control deficiencies to those charged with governance. This allows the entity to take timely remedial action.

Representation letters provide audit evidence as part of the auditor's risk assessment procedures under auditing standards. They represent a form of documentary evidence about management's intents, knowledge and accuracy of the financial statements.

If management were unwilling to sign the representation letter, the auditor would need to reconsider their audit opinion.

Impact on Audit Opinions and Auditor's Reports

The management letter has no direct bearing on the auditor's opinion, unless the issues it raises cast doubt on the fairness of the financial statements.

However, matters raised in the representation letter directly relate to the audit evidence obtained. If management refuses to sign the letter, the auditor would likely issue a qualified opinion or disclaimer of opinion on the financial statements due to the limitation on audit scope and evidence.

In summary, while management letters offer helpful recommendations, representation letters provide the auditor written confirmation of critical information pertinent to the audit itself. Both play key roles in the audit process.

International Standards on Auditing: ISA 580 Management Representations

The International Standards on Auditing (ISA) provide a framework for conducting high quality external audits. ISA 580 specifically focuses on obtaining appropriate written representations from management to support the audit evidence gathered.

Understanding ISA 580 and Its Relevance to Management Representation Letters

ISA 580 outlines the auditor's responsibilities for obtaining written representations from management to confirm certain matters or to support other audit evidence. Some key points:

• Requires auditors to obtain written representations from management that they have fulfilled their financial reporting responsibilities
• Covers areas like recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of information as per the financial reporting framework
• Helps auditors obtain confirmation on matters material to the financial statements, like the completeness of information provided
• Allows for detection of material misstatements due to fraud

By adhering to ISA 580, auditors can ensure management representation letters align with the necessary audit evidence requirements.

Compliance with International Standards on Auditing

It is critical that management representation letters comply with ISA guidelines, including:

• Obtaining representations from appropriate individuals : Those with overall responsibility for financial reporting, such as the CEO and CFO
• Written format : Printed on the organization's letterhead and signed by hand
• Date : No earlier than the date of the audit report
• Wording : Clear acknowledgement of responsibilities, accuracy of information provided, etc.

Strict compliance ensures the representations constitute valid and appropriate audit evidence as per ISA 500.

Case Studies: Adherence to ISA 580 in Practice

Company A - Drafted a management representation letter that was vague, unsigned, and outdated. By not adhering to ISA 580, they had to invest additional time and resources to obtain proper representations.

Company B - Carefully followed ISA 580 requirements. The CFO and CEO signed off on a letter confirming completeness of information and awareness of responsibilities. This aligned smoothly with the audit process.

As exemplified, non-compliance ultimately wastes time and resources. Whereas alignment with ISA 580 standards helps streamline external audits.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Management representation letters are important, standard audit evidence that reduce risk. They signify management's representations concerning the financial statements and accountability for internal controls, fraud, and information provided to auditors.

Summarizing the Role of Management Representation Letters in Audits

Management representation letters summarize key information and representations from management to auditors. They serve several key functions:

• Confirm management's responsibility for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements
• Disclose any issues or deficiencies in internal controls
• Affirm that all relevant information has been provided to auditors
• Highlight any fraud, illegal acts, or noncompliance with laws and regulations

By obtaining these written representations, auditors reduce engagement risk and confirm their understanding of management's views and positions.

Final Thoughts on Best Practices and Compliance

It is critical that management representation letters adhere to regulations and professional standards. Key best practices include:

• Ensuring the letter is dated as of the date of the auditor's report
• Having the letter signed by those with appropriate responsibilities and authority
• Disclosing all relevant issues completely and accurately
• Following the guidelines and requirements outlined in ISA 580 and other applicable standards

Diligent compliance promotes accuracy, transparency, and accountability.

Encouraging Diligence and Transparency in Financial Reporting

At their core, management representation letters aim to foster diligent, truthful, and transparent financial reporting. By eliciting key written representations from management, auditors promote an environment of responsibility, compliance, and ethical practice. This ultimately supports the accuracy and reliability of financial statements for all stakeholders.

Related posts

• What is Transfer Pricing?
• Related Party Disclosures in Financial Statements
• Statutory Audit vs Internal Audit
• Financial Statement Presentation: Structure and Requirements

FreeAgent Review: Navigating the Perks for Small Businesses and Freelancers

How to Choose the Best South American Outsourcing Company for Your Needs

What is a Deferred Tax Asset?

We've received your job requirements, and our team is working hard to find the perfect candidate for you. If you have more job openings available, feel free to submit another job description, and we'll be happy to assist you. 

• Submit a New Job Description

Unlock the Talent Your Business Deserves

Hire Accounting and Finance Professionals from South America.

• Start Interviewing For Free

The Role of Management Representation Letters in Audits

Explore the significance of management representation letters in audits, their preparation process, and common misunderstandings in this insightful overview.

Audits are a critical component of financial transparency and corporate governance. Within this process, management representation letters play an essential role that often goes unnoticed by those outside the accounting profession.

These documents serve as a written assertion from company management regarding the accuracy and completeness of information provided to auditors. Their importance cannot be overstated, as they underpin the trust and integrity of the entire audit process.

Purpose of Management Representation Letters

Management representation letters serve as a formal attestation from a company’s executives to the auditors, confirming the veracity of the financial statements and disclosures. These letters are a professional necessity, providing auditors with assurances that all relevant information has been disclosed. They are a testament to the management’s confidence in their financial reporting and their commitment to transparency.

The letters also support the auditor’s assessment of the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements. By obtaining written confirmations, auditors can reduce the extent of substantive testing required, which can streamline the audit process. This efficiency is beneficial for both the auditors and the company being audited, as it can lead to a more focused and timely audit.

Moreover, these letters can be a safeguard against potential disputes or legal issues that may arise post-audit. In instances where inaccuracies are discovered after the audit has been completed, the letter serves as a record that management had affirmed the completeness and accuracy of the information at the time of the audit. This can be particularly important in cases where financial statements are later found to be fraudulent or misleading.

Preparing a Management Representation Letter

The preparation of a management representation letter is a meticulous process that requires careful attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the company’s financial affairs. It is a collaborative effort between management and auditors to ensure that all significant information is accurately reflected.

Necessary Statements Identification

Identifying the necessary statements to be included in the management representation letter is a foundational step. These statements typically cover a range of areas such as the acknowledgment of responsibility for the fair presentation of financial statements in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework, confirmation of the completeness of the information provided, and the disclosure of any subsequent events that may affect the financial statements. Management must also confirm that they have made the auditors aware of all known instances of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the company. The identification process is guided by professional auditing standards, such as those issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) or the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB).

Information Completeness

Ensuring the completeness of information in the management representation letter is paramount. This involves a thorough review of the company’s financial records and disclosures to verify that all relevant information has been included. Management must confirm that all transactions have been recorded and are reflected in the financial statements. They must also attest to the appropriateness of the accounting policies applied and whether any unrecorded liabilities exist. This step is critical as it directly impacts the credibility of the financial statements and the audit’s outcome. The completeness of information also extends to the disclosure of any related party transactions and the effects of any uncorrected misstatements identified during the audit.

Review and Approval

The final step in preparing a management representation letter is the review and approval by the company’s top executives, typically the CEO and CFO. This review process is not merely a formality; it is an active examination to ensure that the letter accurately reflects the company’s financial position and that all statements can be substantiated. The approval signifies that management has taken ownership of the representations made within the letter. It is also an opportunity for management to discuss any concerns or clarifications with the auditors before the letter is finalized. The signed letter is then dated as of the last day of fieldwork, signifying that the representations are relevant and up-to-date with the findings of the audit.

Misconceptions About Representation Letters

A common misunderstanding about management representation letters is that they are a mere formality, a routine sign-off without substantial impact on the audit’s outcome. This view underestimates the letter’s function as a document that auditors rely upon for assurance beyond the financial data and records they examine. It is not simply a procedural step, but a declaration that can have legal implications for the signatories, particularly if it is later found that the information provided was knowingly false or misleading.

Another misconception is that the letter is solely for the benefit of the auditors. While it is true that auditors use these letters to corroborate information and reduce audit risk, the benefits extend to the management and the company as well. The process of preparing the letter encourages a comprehensive review of the company’s financial disclosures, which can lead to the identification and rectification of errors before the audit is finalized. This proactive approach can enhance the quality of financial reporting and potentially prevent future financial discrepancies.

There is also a belief that once the letter is signed and the audit is complete, the responsibilities of management in relation to the representations made are concluded. However, the representations have a lasting effect, as they are a testament to the financial condition of the company at the point of the audit. Should any issues arise from the period covered by the audit, the representations made can be scrutinized for their accuracy and completeness.

How External Users Leverage Accounting Information

Strengthening your control environment for financial integrity, you may also be interested in..., corporate governance and its impact on social responsibility, crafting an effective due diligence report, strengthening financial integrity: the critical role of icfr in modern accounting, effective guide to hiring an auditor: steps & pitfalls.

• Owner’s Profile
• Homeowner’s Association
• Reserve Study Services
• Individuals
• New! Associations & Taxes
• Treasurer’s Handbook
• The Condo Book

Understanding the Representation Letter

Written by David T. Schwindt, CPA

What is a Representation Letter? As a Board member or manager of a community management company, you may be asked to sign a representation letter at the conclusion of an audit or a reviewed financial statement engagement.  Although the letter is from the Association/management company to the CPA, the CPA will generally draft the letter on behalf of the Association.   The letter includes certain assertions about the Association during the period covered by the financial statements.  Those assertions include but are not limited to the following:

• The Association/management company has provided the CPA with all requested financial information.
• The Association/management company has disclosed all related party transactions.
• The Association/management company has disclosed all existing and potential litigation.
• The Association/management company has disclosed any knowledge of fraud or financial irregularities.
• The Association takes responsibility for the design and implementation of a system of internal controls.  These controls include but are not limited to safeguarding assets, approving transactions and minimizing the risk of someone perpetrating a theft of money or information and not being discovered in a reasonable amount of time. Although the Board is ultimately responsible for this activity, it is common that Boards rely upon the management company to assist in this responsibility.

In some instances, the management company may sign a different representation letter because the responsibilities are slightly different.

Why is the Representation Letter necessary? The American Institute of Certified Public Accounts has determined that those charged with governance (the board of directors and the community management company) should take responsibility for the assertions in the representation letter.  CPAs are mandated to obtain the signed representation letter before issuing the final financial statements.

Who should sign the representation letter? Most often, the Board Chair, Board Treasurer and community manager signs the letter.

When does the Representation Letter need to be signed? The letter needs to be signed at the end of the engagement generally after a draft of the financial statements are issued.  Schwindt & Co combines the representation letter with the management letter comments and proposed adjusting journal entries for ease of review.  When the signed document is received by our office, we are then able to issue the final financial statements.

Should a new Board member or community manager who was not involved with Association management or governance during the period under audit or review be hesitant about signing the representation letter? This is a common question and the answer is simple.  No!  The first paragraph of the representation states that whoever signs the letter does so based on the best knowledge and belief of the person signing.  This means that even though you may be new to the Board or management company, it is perfectly fine to sign the letter because you will only be asserting to issues that you have knowledge.  It is very common for Board members/managers to sign a representation letter even though they were not involved during the period being audited or reviewed.

• Representation letters are normal and required before the issuance of audited/reviewed financial statements.
• Board members are only asserting to issues that they are aware of and new board members and managers frequently are required to sign representation letters.
• The Board Chair, Board Treasurer and community manager are generally required to sign the representation letter.

Questions regarding this article may be directed to David T. Schwindt, CPA at Schwindt & Co. (503) 227-1165.

12300 SE Mallard Way, Suite 275 Milwaukie, OR 97222 (503) 227-1165

OFFICE HOURS

Monday-Thursday, 9 am – 3 pm Friday, By Appointment Only

Copyright 2017-2024 Schwindt & Co. | All Rights Reserved

Management Representation Letter: Format, Content, Signature

Home » Bookkeeping » Management Representation Letter: Format, Content, Signature

As of 2019, the FASB requires publicly traded companies to prepare financial statements following the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Auditors are required by professional standards to report, in writing, internal control matters that they believe should be brought to the attention of those charged with governance (the board). Generally, if your auditor is going to put an internal control matter in a letter, they have assessed that the matter was the result of a deficiency in internal controls. This is an important part of that audit that the profession does not take lightly.

One common example of a deficiency in internal control that’s severe enough to be considered a material weakness or significant deficiency is when an organization lacks the knowledge and training to prepare its own financial statements, including footnote disclosures. The “SAS 115” letter is usually issued when any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses would have been discussed with management during the audit, but are not required to be communicated in written form. In performing an audit of your Plan’s internal controls and plan financials, your auditors are required to obtain an understanding of the Plan’s operations and internal controls.

A management representation letter is a form letter written by a company’s external auditors, which is signed by senior company management. The letter attests to the accuracy of the financial statements that the company has submitted to the auditors for their analysis. The CEO and the most senior accounting person (such as the CFO) are usually required to sign the letter. The letter is signed following the completion of audit fieldwork, and before the financial statements are issued along with the auditor’s opinion. External auditors follow a set of standards different from that of the company or organization hiring them to do the work.

In doing so, they may become aware of matters related to your Plan’s internal control that may be considered deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. Audits performed by outside parties can be extremely helpful in removing any bias in reviewing the state of a company’s financials. Financial audits seek to identify if there are any material misstatements in the financial statements. An unqualified, or clean, auditor’s opinion provides financial statement users with confidence that the financials are both accurate and complete. External audits, therefore, allow stakeholders to make better, more informed decisions related to the company being audited.

The representation should reaffirm your client’s understanding of all significant terms in the engagement letter. A relevant assertion is a financial statement assertion that has a reasonable possibility of containing a misstatement or misstatements that would cause the financial statements to be materially misstated.

The purpose of an internal audit is to ensure compliance with laws and regulations and to help maintain accurate and timely financial reporting and data collection. It also provides a benefit to management by identifying flaws in internal control or financial reporting prior to its review by external auditors.

Depending on materiality and other qualitative factors, the auditors will consider the deficiency to be an “other” matter, significant deficiency, or material weakness. The auditor has discretion on which category the deficiency falls into, but are otherwise required to use the standard wording and definitions in the letter.

It serves to document management’s representations during the audit, reducing misunderstandings of management’s responsibilities for the financial statements. The definition of good internal controls is that they allow errors and other misstatements to be prevented or detected and corrected by (the nonprofit’s) employees in the normal course of performing their duties.

Material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified during the audit, and auditors are required to disclose this in their written communication. The auditor’s report contains the auditor’s opinion on whether a company’s financial statements comply with accounting standards. The results of the internal audit are used to make managerial changes and improvements to internal controls.

What is a management representation letter?

A management representation letter is a form letter written by a company’s external auditors, which is signed by senior company management. The letter attests to the accuracy of the financial statements that the company has submitted to the auditors for their analysis.

A control objective provides a specific target against which to evaluate the effectiveness of controls. Management representation is a letter issued by a client to the auditor in writing as part of audit evidences. The representations letter must cover all periods encompassed by the audit report, and must be dated the same date of audit work completion.

These types of auditors are used when an organization doesn’t have the in-house resources to audit certain parts of their own operations. The assertion of completeness is an assertion that the financial statements are thorough and include every item that should be included in the statement for a given accounting period. The assertion of completeness also states that a company’s entire inventory, even inventory that may be temporarily in the possession of a third party, is included in the total inventory figure appearing on a financial statement. The compilation standards do not require practitioners to obtain a management representation letter, but this does not mean that it’s not a prudent thing to do. Obtaining a representation letter helps to ensure your client understands the services that you have provided, the limitations on the work you have completed, and that they are ultimately responsible for their financial statements.

The biggest difference between an internal and external audit is the concept of independence of the external auditor. When audits are performed by third parties, the resulting auditor’s opinion expressed on items being audited (a company’s financials, internal controls, or a system) can be candid and honest without it affecting daily work relationships within the company. Auditors evaluate each internal control deficiency noted during the audit to determine whether the deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, is severe enough to be considered a material weakness or significant deficiency. In assessing the deficiency, auditors consider the magnitude of potential misstatements of your financial statements as well as the likelihood that internal controls would not prevent or detect and correct the misstatements.

Representation to Management

• In an audit of financial statements, professional standards require that auditors obtain an understanding of internal controls to the extent necessary to plan the audit.
• written confirmation from management to the auditor about the fairness of various financial statement elements.
• Auditors use this understanding of internal controls to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements and to design appropriate audit procedures to minimize that risk.

The idea behind a management representation letter is to take away some of the legal burdens of delivering wrong financial statements from the auditor to the company. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Internal auditors are employed by the company or organization for whom they are performing an audit, and the resulting audit report is given directly to management and the board of directors. Consultant auditors, while not employed internally, use the standards of the company they are auditing as opposed to a separate set of standards.

If the auditors detect an unexpected material misstatement during your audit, it could indicate that your internal controls are not functioning properly. Conversely, lack of an actual misstatement doesn’t necessarily mean that your internal controls are working.

The determination of whether an assertion is a relevant assertion is based on inherent risk, without regard to the effect of controls. Financial statements and related disclosures refers to a company’s financial statements and notes to the financial statements as presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). References to financial statements and related disclosures do not extend to the preparation of management’s discussion and analysis or other similar financial information presented outside a company’s GAAP-basis financial statements and notes.

External audits can include a review of both financial statements and a company’s internal controls. When a company’s financial statements are audited, the principal element an auditor reviews is the reliability of the financial statement assertions. In the United States, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) establishes the accounting standards that companies must follow when preparing their financial statements.

In an audit of financial statements, professional standards require that auditors obtain an understanding of internal controls to the extent necessary to plan the audit. Auditors use this understanding of internal controls to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements and to design appropriate audit procedures to minimize that risk. written confirmation from management to the auditor about the fairness of various financial statement elements. The purpose of the letter is to emphasize that the financial statements are management’s representations, and thus management has the primary responsibility for their accuracy.

Expert Social Media Tips to Help Your Small Business Succeed

This letter is useful for setting the expectations of both parties to the arrangement. Almost all companies receive a yearly audit of their financial statements, such as the income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement. Lenders often require the results of an external audit annually as part of their debt covenants. For some companies, audits are a legal requirement due to the compelling incentives to intentionally misstate financial information in an attempt to commit fraud.

Management representation letter

As long as there’s a reasonable possibility for material misstatement of account balances or financial statement disclosures, your internal controls are considered to be deficient. An auditor typically will not issue an opinion on a company’s financial statements without first receiving a signed management representation letter. An audit engagement is an arrangement that an auditor has with a client to perform an audit of the client’s accounting records and financial statements. The term usually applies to the contractual arrangement between the two parties, rather than the full set of auditing tasks that the auditor will perform. To create an engagement, the two parties meet to discuss the services needed by the client.

As a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002, publicly traded companies must also receive an evaluation of the effectiveness of their internal controls. As noted above, an internal control letter is usually the result of a deficiency in internal controls discovered during the audit, most commonly from a material audit adjustment. The letter includes required language regarding the severity of the deficiency.

Real Business Owners,

The parties then agree on the services to be provided, along with a price and the period during which the audit will be conducted. This information is stated in an engagement letter, which is prepared by the auditor and sent to the client. If the client agrees with the terms of the letter, a person authorized to do so signs the letter and returns a copy to the auditor. By doing so, the parties indicate that an audit engagement has been initiated.

Also, the letter provides supplementary audit evidence of an internal nature by giving formal management replies to auditor questions regarding matters that did not come to the auditor’s attention in performing audit procedures. Some auditors request written representations of all financial statement items. All auditors require representations regarding receivables, inventories, plant and equipment, liabilities, and subsequent events. The letter is required at the completion of the audit fieldwork and prior to issuance of the financial statements with the auditor’s opinion.

Auditors spend a lot of time assessing how material audit adjustments and immaterial adjustments that have the potential to be material will be communicated in the internal control letter. The Representation Letter is issued with the draft audit and is required by auditing standards to finalize the audit. The Representation Letter is a letter from the Association to our firm confirming responsibilities of the board and management for the financial statements, as well as confirming information provided to us during the audit. The President or Treasurer and Management need to sign the Representation Letter and return it back to our office within 60 days from the date the draft audit was issued. Representation Letters received after the 60-day mark may result in additional auditing procedures in order to finalize the audit and comply with auditing standards at an additional expense to the Association.

03 Apr What are Management Representation Letters?

In the world of assurance engagements, a management representation letter is a formal document that represents management’s agreement with the financial statements that are being audited or reviewed. This letter is a critical part of the assurance engagement process and is required by the auditor or reviewer as evidence that management acknowledges and accepts responsibility for the financial statements.

A management representation letter is typically issued by senior management, such as the CEO or CFO, and is addressed to the CPA firm performing the audit or review. It contains a series of statements that confirm certain facts and assurances about the company’s financial information, including the completeness and accuracy of financial records, disclosures of relevant information, and adherence to accounting principles.

The letter serves several purposes, including:

• Confirming the accuracy of financial information : The management representation letter is used to confirm that the financial statements are accurate and complete. This helps provide assurance to stakeholders that the financial statements are reliable.
• Demonstrating management’s responsibility : By signing the letter, management acknowledges its responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements. This helps to provide accountability and transparency to stakeholders.
• Providing evidence for auditors and reviewer s: The management representation letter provides evidence to the CPA firm that management has taken responsibility for the financial statements, which helps to support the audit opinion or review conclusion.
• Reducing the risk of misstatements : The letter helps to reduce the risk of misstatements by requiring management to review the financial statements and provide assurance that they are accurate and complete.

Overall, the management representation letter is a critical part of the assurance engagement process, as it helps to provide assurance that the financial statements are accurate and complete, and that management takes responsibility for them. Without this letter, CPA firms would not have the necessary evidence to support their opinions and conclusions, which could lead to a lack of confidence in the financial statements and potential legal and financial consequences for the company. In fact, CPA firms are not permitted to complete their engagement and issue an audit or review engagement report until management provides a signed management representation letter.

If you require an audit or review and would like to speak to someone about these processes, please contact us to set up a free consultation.

Jennifer Scott

Cpa, cga – senior manager.

Jennifer Scott, a Senior Manager at Clearline brings a wealth of expertise in Private Enterprise and Assurance, holding designations as a CPA and CGA. Jennifer’s focus at Clearline includes conducting reviews, compilations, and providing tax services tailored to owner-manager businesses and partnerships, with a keen interest in industries such as professionals, manufacturing, real estate, and services. Her commitment to exceptional client service is evident through her proactive approach to staying updated on evolving accounting standards and tax legislation, thereby making her clients’ lives easier Jennifer’s educational background includes a Bachelor of Commerce from UBC with a major in Accounting, followed by over 15 years of experience in public practice, specializing in private enterprise. She appreciates the supportive environment at Clearline and enjoys various activities outside of work, including travelling, cheering on her children in sports like soccer, baseball, and volleyball, indulging in long walks with her dog while listening to podcasts, spending quality time with loved ones, and exploring her passion for baking through experimenting with new recipes.

Charmaine Pirrie

Cpa, ca(sa) – senior manager.

Charmaine Pirrie, a Senior Manager at Clearline is a CPA and CA (SA) with a background in audit and review engagements. With experience from Grant Thornton and D&Co, she brings expertise in private company audits and values Clearline’s supportive environment and technical resources. Charmaine also finds fulfillment in delving into her clients’ businesses to provide tailored services, ensuring meticulous audit and review procedures. Outside of work, she enjoys spending time with family, going for walks, and swimming.

Deepeka Dhillon

Cpa – manager.

Deepeka Dhillon, a Manager at Clearline, holds a CPA designation with a focus in Private Enterprise and Tax. Her primary responsibilities include compliance, corporate restructuring, and, estate and succession planning. Deepeka’s passion lies in continuous learning, enabling her to provide tailored solutions to clients’ unique needs. With a CPA designation and completion of the CPA in-depth tax program, she brings a strong educational background to her role at Clearline. Deepeka values the countless opportunities at Clearline to expand her knowledge in the complex world of tax. Outside work, she enjoys spending time with her beloved Jack Russell Terrier, Opie.

Raj Momrath

Cpa, ca, senior tax manager.

Raj Momrath, a Senior Tax Manager at Clearline, is a CPA, CA specializing in Canadian Tax. With a focus on Canadian tax planning, corporate reorganizations, estate planning, and providing business advice, Raj caters to a diverse clientele, including small owner-manager companies, high-net-worth individuals and large privately held multinational firms. His passion lies in helping Canadian owner-manager businesses and their shareholders minimize their overall tax obligations while navigating disputes with the Canada Revenue Agency and ensuring compliance with the complex Canadian tax system. Raj’s professional journey includes prior experience in PwC’s tax group, where he obtained his Chartered Accountant designation and then some time at some mid-sized firms. Raj completed the CPA Canada InDepth Tax course in 2017 strengthening his knowledge of Canadian tax. At Clearline, Raj appreciates working alongside knowledgeable colleagues and enjoys spending quality time with his wife and two sons and attending and volunteering with their sports activities. In his leisure time, Raj indulges in barbequing, golfing, and spending time outdoors, finding relaxation and enjoyment in these pursuits.

Julia Wallis

Julia Wallis, a Senior Manager at Clearline, holds designations as a CPA, CGA, and also holds a BA. Working within the Private Enterprise Group, her primary focus revolves around assisting entrepreneurs in understanding their personal and business finances while ensuring compliance with tax reporting requirements. Julia finds fulfillment in learning about her clients’ businesses and providing financial insights to enhance their management effectiveness while optimizing tax strategies. With a diverse career spanning various companies and public practice roles, including as a controller, Julia’s progression has equipped her with invaluable skills and insights into different business operations. She chose Clearline for its respected partners and staff, aligned philosophy on client service, and flexibility to balance demanding tax filing periods with leisure time for travel and personal interests such as gardening, wine exploration, reading, and relaxation.

Annelie Vistica

Cpa, ca – principal.

Annelie Vistica, a Principal at Clearline, is a CPA and CA with a strong background in private enterprise and assurance. With a Bachelor of Accountancy from the University of Stellenbosch in South Africa and extensive experience in tax, Annelie brings expertise in business setup, growth planning, and estate transitioning. She is passionate about engaging with clients to support them through various business stages, from inception to succession planning. Annelie values the supportive environment at Clearline, where she appreciates colleagues’ assistance in tax and assurance. Outside work, she enjoys spending time with her family and dog, exploring nature, visiting family in the Okanagan, and travelling the world.

Bilal Kathrada

Cpa, ca, principal.

Bilal, a Principal at Clearline Chartered Professional Accountants, primarily focuses on income tax and succession planning for Canadian owner-managed businesses in various industries. Bilal received his Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Victoria and obtained his CA designation in 2005.

Prior to Clearline, he worked in the tax group of a large international accounting firm in Vancouver and a mid-sized accounting firm located in the Fraser Valley.

Outside of the office, he enjoys spending time with his wife and three children. He enjoys outdoor activities such as golf and spending time with his family and friends.

Danny Sandhu

Cpa, manager.

Bio coming soon.

Shehzel Saif

Cpa, tax manager.

As Clearline’s Tax Manager, Shehzel focuses on tax planning, corporate reorganizations and succession and estate planning. She’s passionate about continuous learning and staying up to date on tax legislation changes and helping clients with succession. In addition to her CPA designation, Shehzel also has a Bachelor of Business Administration and has completed the CPA In-Depth Taxation Program. Outside of work, she enjoys spending time with family and friends, traveling and trying out new recipes.

Ameeta Randhawa

As Clearline’s HR Manager, Ameeta supports our firm’s greatest resource—our staff. With a Bachelor of Business Administration in Human Resources and over 7 years of HR experience in various industries, she ensures all employees have a positive experience at Clearline. Ameeta’s focuses include recruitment, performance management, employee relations, program and policy development, and employee engagement. Outside of work, she enjoys traveling and spending time with friends and family.

CPA, CA, Senior Manager

Michael is a Senior Manager in Private Enterprise, carrying out reviews, compilations, and tax services for small- to medium-sized businesses. With a Bachelor of Commerce specializing in finance and a Diploma in Accounting, backed by over a decade of accounting experience, Michael is a trusted advisor who helps clients’ businesses succeed. Outside of the office, Michael enjoys spending time with family, trying out different restaurants in the city, and building and collecting mechanical keyboards.

CPA, CGA, Manager

Victor K. Yoshida

Victor was born and raised in Vancouver and obtained his Bachelor of Commerce from the University of British Columbia. He articled with Deloitte & Touche and received his CA designation in 1984. Victor was accepted to the firm’s tax group and went on to complete the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants In-Depth Tax course.

Victor specializes in Canadian income tax issues for professional and owner-managed businesses. He has extensive experience with business succession, estate planning, wealth preservation issues, corporate reorganizations, as well as mergers and acquisitions.

Victor was a member of the education committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of British Columbia and has held executive positions with various amateur sport organizations.

In his free time, Victor enjoys training for marathons, travelling, and spending time with his family.

Clarity, strategy and confidence straight to your inbox.

Sign up for Clearline news and insights

Opinion Letters Vs. Management Letters in the Accounting Field

• Small Business
• Accounting & Bookkeeping
• Management Accounting
• ')" data-event="social share" data-info="Pinterest" aria-label="Share on Pinterest">
• ')" data-event="social share" data-info="Reddit" aria-label="Share on Reddit">
• ')" data-event="social share" data-info="Flipboard" aria-label="Share on Flipboard">

What Is an Audit Letter?

Purpose of internal control, definition of a gaap audit.

• Supplier Audit Procedures
• What Does the Process of Performing an External Audit Include?

Small businesses are often required to submit audited financial statements to investors to obtain financing and help accelerate the growth of a company. A financial statement audit is an examination of an entity’s balance sheet and income statement and includes reports issued by auditors.

Two reports issued are an opinion letter, which states whether the accounts are presented in accordance with accounting principles, and a management letter which explains whether there are any problems identified with the company's internal controls. These letters are required by accounting standards and help provide investors with an overall picture of the operations of an organization.

Mandatory Accounting Letters

Generally accepted auditing standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) govern the way auditors plan, conduct and report the results of an audit. The results of a financial statement audit are reported by the auditor to a company’s management by issuing an opinion letter.

The opinion letter, otherwise known as the independent auditors report, states whether the financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles accepted in the United States.

The management letter, also known as the internal control letter, communicates deficiencies and weaknesses in a company’s organizational structure and internal controls.

Opinion and Audit Management Letter Purpose

An independent auditor's report is issued to communicate an auditor’s opinion as to whether or not an entity’s financial activity is reported correctly. The report is presented to investors to assure them that amounts are accurate and are correctly classified. An internal control letter is issued to communicate the status of an entity’s internal control system. In this report, the auditor details areas in a company’s organization where a misstatement in the financial statements would likely occur.

A common comment identified in an internal control letter is a lack of separation of duties. This comment indicates that during a financial statement audit, an auditor identified job duties that should be separated between two or more individuals or departments, but were not.

Four Possible Opinions

An independent auditor's report provides one of four opinions as a result of a financial statement audit. The opinions issued are unqualified, qualified, adverse and disclaimer of opinion. According to Accounting Tools , an unqualified opinion has no reservations concerning the financial statements. This is also known as a clean opinion meaning that the financial statements appear to be presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

The other three opinions are less favorable. The internal control management letter points to the material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in an entity’s internal control. This letter identifies problems and may include recommendations from auditors as how to improve the weakness or deficiency. Often times, management provides a written response to accompany the auditor’s comments.

Who Reads the Letters?

The letters are important because they are submitted to outside parties, such as bankers and regulatory agencies, and are often the deciding factor as to whether an entity receives financing. Also, these letters are submitted to an organization's board of directors and may be used in evaluations of management’s performance. Ultimately, negative comments deter potential business partners from engaging in future partnerships.

Financial statement audits and the resulting auditor's reports and internal control letters require major resources of an organization. To obtain these reports, entities sacrifice employee time and monetary resources. To ensure the reports and additional expenses have a positive affect, provide employees with the proper training to report all transactions in accordance with GAAP.

• American Institute of CPAs: Home Page
• Accounting Tools: Accountant's Opinion
• American Institute of CPAs: Find A CPA

Related Articles

Types of audit opinion letters, six-step audit process, how do i prepare a financial statement compilation, how to conduct an internal control process walkthrough, what is an external business audit, how to write a response to an audit report, what are the 4 types of audit reports, responsibilities of audit firms for quarterly financial statements, what is included in audited financial statements, most popular.

• 1 Types of Audit Opinion Letters
• 2 Six-Step Audit Process
• 3 How Do I Prepare a Financial Statement Compilation?
• 4 How to Conduct an Internal Control Process Walkthrough

• Insights & Analysis
• Nonprofit Jobs

Step 3: After the Audit

After the audit, the audit committee, executive director, and senior financial staff are responsible for reviewing the draft audit report, asking questions about the auditors' findings, and evaluating any recommendations before they are presented to the board in the final report.

What is the client representation "letter to management”?  This letter, sometimes referred to simply as the "management letter" serves to identify areas of operations or procedures that the nonprofit may want to improve or redesign. Since auditors work with a variety of organizations, they often are aware of "best practices" or -- at the very least -- "better practices" that they can point out in the letter to management. The audit committee or staff often asks to review a draft of the management letter just to make sure that the letter is accurate before the final version goes to the board of directors, since the board is likely to be concerned about any deficiencies or even less serious concerns that the auditors identify in the letter. The accounting standards require the auditors to report to the board any "material weaknesses" and significant deficiencies. ( SAS Nos. 114, 115 )

Issues that auditors may point out in the client representation letter typically fall into two categories:

• Material internal control issues : Issues that auditors would identify include any weaknesses in the processes, systems, and internal procedures that help to ensure that all financial transactions are recorded properly. Strong internal controls (e.g., early detection and correction) serve to highlight errors and irregularities in financial operations. Correcting the issues will provide additional integrity to the financial statements and may help to reduce audit costs in the future. The auditors will point out any material internal control issues in the management letter so that the nonprofit can address those issues before the next audit.
• Operating inefficiencies : Management letters may identify issues that are, or could become red flags, and propose improvements to resolve problems and strengthen operations. Sometimes it takes an independent or outsider’s eye to identify inefficiencies that could be improved or new technologies that will improve operations. The auditor’s letter to management may also point out operating procedures that are inefficient or unnecessary.

What is the role of the audit committee (or the board) after the audit?

The insights shared by the auditors should be presented formally and in-person by the auditor to the board of directors or the audit committee at the conclusion of the audit process. However, first there should be a discussion with the audit committee and management. In addition to acting on suggestions provided by the auditor, management/the audit committee can also use the opportunity of an annual audit to enlist the support of the auditor to undertake new initiatives. If the auditor agrees that initiatives suggested by management may strengthen operations, the auditor may choose to include management's ideas in the management letter.  Management may also identify for the auditor areas that may need further, independent corroboration in order for the board to fully appreciate the ramifications of their decisions.

Questions for the audit committee to discuss with the auditor(s) when reviewing the draft of the management letter and the audited financial statements:

• Did the auditors note any limitations on the scope or nature of the audit procedures?
• What factors did the auditors consider when determining the scope of the audit?
• Did the staff cooperate with the auditors? Was there a healthy flow of information between the staff and auditors?
• Were there any legal and regulatory matters that would impact the organization’s financial statements?
• Were there any conflicts of interest between the auditors and the organization? If so, how were they handled?
• Did the auditors find that the organization’s internal financial controls were adequate?
• Did the auditors provide a written opinion about the quality and acceptability of the nonprofit’s accounting principles?
• Were there any significant changes to the audit plan that occurred during the course of the audit?
• Were there any serious disputes or difficulties encountered by the auditors during the audit?
• The auditors will usually provide such recommendations to the committee in a “letter management.”
• The committee should review the executive director’s comments in response to the letter and receive follow-up reports on actions taken.

Questions for the audit committee to discuss with the executive director (“ED”) after the audit:

• Did the auditors perform their work efficiently and effectively? Are you (ED) satisfied with the scope, nature, and timing of the audit?
• Are you (ED) satisfied with the knowledge, skills, and abilities of those assigned to do the audit?
• Did the auditors work with the organization to ensure complete coverage and effective use of resources without redundant efforts?
• Did the committee and ED review the fee arrangement between the organization and the auditors?
• Was there any documentation that the auditors requested that the staff could not produce?
• Were there any serious disputes or difficulties encountered by the staff during the audit?
• Does the staff believe that the auditors were diligent in their review?
• Was the auditors’ presence on site during fieldwork disruptive?
• Are you satisfied that the external auditors remain independent of the organization in spite of any audit-related, or non-audit services the auditors provide to the organization?

Six questions for the audit committee/board to ask the auditors after the audit:

When the draft report and client representation letter to management is ready but before they are finalized, the audit committee/board liaison should meet with the auditors one final time before the report and letter are dated and released to the board of directors. These questions are designed to determine whether there are any issues to bring to the board's attention in connection with the audit, and to anticipate questions that a board member may typically ask when presented with the independent auditor's report.

• Was the management team cooperative and forthcoming with requested information and documentation?
• How do our accounting policies and procedures compare with those of other comparable nonprofits?
• Are there any items that might be disputed by the IRS? If yes, what documentation should be on hand to bolster the item?
• Did the management team follow suggestions noted by auditors in prior years to correct weaknesses in the internal accounting system?
• Did you discover anything regarding the financial statements or internal financial management procedures that should be brought to the attention of the board of directors?
• Do you have any suggestions for improvements in accounting, reporting, or operating procedures?

Release of the auditor's report to management

After all questions have been asked and answered, including confirmations of anything that the auditors needed to check, the final step is that the auditors will sign and date the report, and deliver it to the board of directors with a client representation letter, the same date as the audit report.

Presentation of the audit report to the board of directors 

During the meeting that the board of directors receives the independent audit, the appropriate action for the agenda is for the  board of directors to "accept" the auditor's report and letter to management, rather than "approve" them. This is because the board's action in connection with the audit is literally to receive and "accept" the auditor's independent report. The findings in the report are not subject to change by the board after the report is submitted to the board, consequently, the board's action is not to approve/disapprove, but to accept the report. However, discussion by the full board of the audit report should be encouraged so that board members are familiar with the report's findings. Generally all board members receive a copy of the independent audit and management letter in their board materials for the meeting during which the report is accepted.

Evaluating and engaging an auditor for the future

During and after the audit, audit committees evaluate the auditors' performance and recommend to the board whether to retain the same firm for next year’s audit or whether to engage a new one. Therefore, it is imperative that the audit committee is diligent in evaluating the auditors. The audit committee should consider a number of questions about its relationship with the independent auditor and should also engage the nonprofit’s key executives for their comments.

To demonstrate a commitment to transparency and accountability, the National Council of Nonprofits posts its  annual audit report  on its website in addition to posting all the other documents required to be made available to the public upon request. Read more about  cultivating a culture of accountability and transparency .

Additional resources for after the audit

• Get the Most Value from Your Audit  (Blue Avocado)
• Auditing the auditor: Questions to ask before and after the audit  (HBK)

Nonprofit Audit Guide© Table of Contents

• Nonprofit Audit Guide© Home Page
• What is an independent audit?  
• Does your nonprofit need to have an independent audit?  
• State law nonprofit audit requirements
• Federal law audit requirements
• Why a nonprofit might conduct an audit even when the law doesn’t require it .
• Board's role and audit committees
• A three-step approach to managing an independent audit
• Myth: Audits uncover fraud
• Acknowledgements

Disclaimer:  The resources in this Guide are offered for informational purposes only. The National Council of Nonprofits recommends consulting a lawyer or accountant who has expertise in accounting rules for charitable nonprofits so that you can be confident that your charitable nonprofit is in compliance with all legal requirements. And, when your organization is looking for trusted information about financial management practices, good governance, and accountability, don’t overlook the resources that membership in your  state association of nonprofits  can provide.

• Tax Preparation
• News & Announcements
• Answers & Insights
• Publications & Articles
• Careers Overview
• Current Openings
• Request a Proposal

What is the difference between an Engagement Letter and Representation Letter?

The Engagement Letter is the contract between our firm and the Association to perform requested services (i.e. conducting the annual audit and preparing tax returns). The Board and Management need to sign and return the Engagement Letter to our office before we may commence the work.

The Representation Letter is issued with the draft audit and is required by auditing standards to finalize the audit. The Representation Letter is a letter from the Association to our firm confirming responsibilities of the board and management for the financial statements, as well as confirming information provided to us during the audit. The President or Treasurer and Management need to sign the Representation Letter and return it back to our office within 60 days from the date the draft audit was issued. Representation Letters received after the 60-day mark may result in additional auditing procedures in order to finalize the audit and comply with auditing standards at an additional expense to the Association.

• Newsletters
• General Accounting
• News & Announcements

Subscribe to Updates