what is long essay

How to Write a Long Essay

How to Write a One Page Essay

Writing an essay as part of a school assignment or a project can be a very tedious task, especially if that essay needs to be long. Even the most confident writers may have no trouble writing a few pages for an assignment but may find it challenging to extend that word count as much as possible. If you're assigned a long essay for one of your classes, there's no reason to worry. With some useful tips at your disposal, you can stretch that essay out without making it sound repetitive or boring the reader with an influx of irrelevant information.

What Is a Long Essay?

A long essay is any essay that tends to be longer than three pages or 3,000 words or more. Of course, the definition of a long essay will differ from one classroom to another, depending on the age and level of the students. And even if you're a college student, you may have some professors who consider a five-page essay to be the average, while another teacher considers five pages to be too much. Therefore, it's important to check with your teacher, though they'll usually clarify this when giving the assignment.

Sometimes, the term "long" applies to how many pages, and sometimes it applies to how many paragraphs or words need to be in the essay. Again, this all depends on your teacher, your school's requirements and the nature of the assignment. Either way, hearing your teacher say that you must write a long essay for your next assignment can certainly cause a lot of stress. The good news is that writing a long essay can be much easier than writing a short essay, especially if you're given some meaningful advice.

Why Would You Be Required to Write a Long Essay?

There are many reasons why teachers would assign a long essay to their students. First of all, writing a long essay is an opportunity for a student to really put his or her writing skills to the test. By the time students get to college, they already have an idea as to how to write a decent paper, but perhaps it's within limits. College professors need to make sure that students are able to write well, because eventually, these students may need to write a thesis or dissertation, and there really is no longer essay than that.

So even though you may think of writing a long essay as a torturous assignment, it's actually a great opportunity to practice a very specific skill that will definitely come in handy in other areas of your life. And, if you build up the right mindset for yourself, writing that long essay shouldn't be any more difficult than any other assignment you've been required to complete.

What Is the Standard Essay Format?

There's a standard essay format understood by most English students around the world. This is how essay writing can be taught in a universal way so that students are successful at writing essays no matter where they're studying. A standard essay format typically includes an introduction, three body paragraphs and a conclusion. Of course, the older a student gets and the more experience they have in school, their essays will gradually get longer and will need to require more detail and features (for instance, citing sources) in order to meet the requirements set by the teacher.

When you need to write a long essay, you can and should still base your writing off of this standard essay format. The only difference is that instead of having three body paragraphs, you're going to have a lot more in order to reach the word count or page requirement that you need to meet. This isn't as hard as it sounds. Instead of squeezing your main idea into one paragraph, try to add more examples and details to make it longer. Also, try to think of other key points that support your essay's theme that might not be so obvious at first.

Start Ahead of Time

The best way to relieve the stress that comes with having to write a long essay is to start ahead of time. Too many college students (and high school students) wait until the last possible minute to write an essay. Though some students may certainly be able to get away with this, it'll be a lot harder when it comes to writing a longer essay. Therefore, make sure you give yourself plenty of time to complete the assignment. It may work better for some people to do a little bit each day until they reach their goal. For instance, if you're required to write 3,000 words for your long essay, then you may feel better writing just 500 words a day over a couple of days instead of trying to bang it all out at once.

How to Write a 3,000 Word Essay in a Day

Some students rather get the hard work out of the way, instead of letting it drag out over a week. Writing a long essay of 3,000 words can be done in a day if you just put your mind to it. Do the following:

• Don't schedule any other appointments or assignments for the day.
• Put away any potential distractions, like your phone or the TV.
• Stay off of social media.
• Work somewhere quiet, like the library or a calm cafe.
• Take breaks every few paragraphs.
• Set a timer for ten minutes and try to work the entire time without stopping.

Create Your Essay Structure

Once you've decided whether or not you're going to write the essay over a couple of days or in just one day, it's time to start writing the actual essay. Like with any writing assignment, the first thing you should do is create an outline and organize your overall essay structure. If you need to write around five pages, which makes sense for a long essay, then you should make an outline that will support that. Take a look at an essay format example to get an idea of how yours should be:

• Introduction (more than two paragraphs)
• A starter question (something for the reader to consider)
• Body "paragraph/idea" one (four paragraphs on average)
• Body "paragraph/idea" two (four paragraphs on average]
• Body "paragraph/idea" three (four paragraphs on average)
• A conclusion

If you're wondering how on earth you're going to create a body section that's four paragraphs long, try to think of one main idea and three examples that tie together with it. For instance, if your long essay is an argumentative piece about "The Importance of Waiting Until You're Financially Stable to Have Children" you can think of at least four key reasons why:

• You won't have to struggle to pay for their needs.
• You can give them more opportunities.
• You can travel as a family.
• You can put away money for their college tuition.

For the first idea, you can talk about this point in very general terms. Then, you can write three more paragraphs underneath that, with each paragraph discussing a specific example. The second paragraph, for example, can be about paying for things like diapers, clothes, formula, etc., and how much each item costs. The second example can be about paying for things when the child gets a little older, like their food, their school supplies, etc. Lastly, the third example (and the fourth paragraph in this section) can discuss paying for things that the child will need as a teenager, such as more clothes, sports uniforms, dental work, etc.

Did You Answer All the Questions?

After you feel like you've exhausted all examples, but you're still under word count or page count, go back and make sure you've answered all the questions. These questions may have been questions in the rubric or the writing prompt that your teacher provided, or they may be questions that you've thought of on your own. In fact, when you start thinking of what to write about, you should brainstorm some questions that a reader may want to find the answer to about the topic, and you should try to answer these throughout your essay. Creating more potential questions can help you reach your word count faster.

Can You Change Words?

If you're close to reaching your word count but you're still not quite there, then go back and see if you can change any of the language in your essay to make it longer. For example, if you have a lot of contractions in your paper (can't, won't, isn't, they're) go back and make them two words instead of contractions, and do this throughout the entire essay. This is a great solution because it won't take away from the readership of your essay, and while this won't extend the word count too much, it will definitely help a bit.

Think of Additional Details You Can Add

In addition to changing contractions, you can also think of other details you can add to elongate your essay. There are always more examples you can add or more information you can research that will not only resonate with the reader but increase your overall word count or page count.

For example, if you're talking about how parents who decide to have children once they're financially stable will have the opportunity to put more money toward their child's tuition, then you can go back and add plenty of detail supporting this argument. Did you give an example of how much tuition costs? Did you add details about what parents can do with the money if their children decide not to go to college? What about the different types of college funds that exist? These are all details you can add that will increase the length of your essay, while also adding value.

However, when you do this, keep in mind that you want to be very careful not to add too much "fluff." Fluff is when you add information or details that simply aren't valuable to the writing itself. It makes the reader (who in most cases is your teacher and the one grading the assignment) want to skim over your piece, and this can lead to him or her giving you a lower grade.

Edit, Edit, Edit

Last but not least, in order to write a long essay, you must have the capacity to edit your work. Editing not only helps to ensure your paper is long enough, reads well, and is free from grammatical errors, but it will also give you an opportunity to add in more information here and there. To edit, you should always read out loud to yourself, and take a break from your work, so you can revisit it with a fresh pair of eyes. You can easily check if you've reached the length requirements by clicking on "word count" or counting the number of pages yourself, though your document will reveal this as you scroll down.

Related Articles

How to Write an Advantages and Disadvantages Essay

How to Make an Essay Longer

How to Write an Essay Fast

Problems That Students Encounter With Essay Writing

How to Write a 3,000 Word Essay

Personal Statement for scholarship: How to Write One, How long Does ...

College Essay Ideas

10 Good Transitions for a Conclusion Paragraph

• Save the Student: How to Write a 3,000 Word Essay in a Day
• International Student: General Essay Writing Tips
• You may want to have a friend read through your essay. He may catch mistakes that you have missed.

Hana LaRock is a freelance content writer from New York, currently living in Mexico. Before becoming a writer, Hana worked as a teacher for several years in the U.S. and around the world. She has her teaching certification in Elementary Education and Special Education, as well as a TESOL certification. Please visit her website, www.hanalarockwriting.com, to learn more.

• If you are writing in a new discipline, you should always make sure to ask about conventions and expectations for introductions, just as you would for any other aspect of the essay. For example, while it may be acceptable to write a two-paragraph (or longer) introduction for your papers in some courses, instructors in other disciplines, such as those in some Government courses, may expect a shorter introduction that includes a preview of the argument that will follow.  
• In some disciplines (Government, Economics, and others), it’s common to offer an overview in the introduction of what points you will make in your essay. In other disciplines, you will not be expected to provide this overview in your introduction.  
• Avoid writing a very general opening sentence. While it may be true that “Since the dawn of time, people have been telling love stories,” it won’t help you explain what’s interesting about your topic.  
• Avoid writing a “funnel” introduction in which you begin with a very broad statement about a topic and move to a narrow statement about that topic. Broad generalizations about a topic will not add to your readers’ understanding of your specific essay topic.  
• Avoid beginning with a dictionary definition of a term or concept you will be writing about. If the concept is complicated or unfamiliar to your readers, you will need to define it in detail later in your essay. If it’s not complicated, you can assume your readers already know the definition.  
• Avoid offering too much detail in your introduction that a reader could better understand later in the paper.
• picture_as_pdf Introductions

Choose Your Test

Sat / act prep online guides and tips, the best college essay length: how long should it be.

College Essays

Figuring out your college essay can be one of the most difficult parts of applying to college. Even once you've read the prompt and picked a topic, you might wonder: if you write too much or too little, will you blow your chance of admission? How long should a college essay be?

Whether you're a terse writer or a loquacious one, we can advise you on college essay length. In this guide, we'll cover what the standard college essay length is, how much word limits matter, and what to do if you aren't sure how long a specific essay should be.

How Long Is a College Essay? First, Check the Word Limit

You might be used to turning in your writing assignments on a page-limit basis (for example, a 10-page paper). While some colleges provide page limits for their college essays, most use a word limit instead. This makes sure there's a standard length for all the essays that a college receives, regardless of formatting or font.

In the simplest terms, your college essay should be pretty close to, but not exceeding, the word limit in length. Think within 50 words as the lower bound, with the word limit as the upper bound. So for a 500-word limit essay, try to get somewhere between 450-500 words. If they give you a range, stay within that range.

College essay prompts usually provide the word limit right in the prompt or in the instructions.

For example, the University of Illinois says :

"You'll answer two to three prompts as part of your application. The questions you'll answer will depend on whether you're applying to a major or to our undeclared program , and if you've selected a second choice . Each response should be approximately 150 words."

As exemplified by the University of Illinois, the shortest word limits for college essays are usually around 150 words (less than half a single-spaced page). Rarely will you see a word limit higher than around 650 words (over one single-spaced page). College essays are usually pretty short: between 150 and 650 words. Admissions officers have to read a lot of them, after all!

Weigh your words carefully, because they are limited!

How Flexible Is the Word Limit?

But how flexible is the word limit? What if your poignant anecdote is just 10 words too long—or 100 too short?

Can I Go Over the Word Limit?

If you are attaching a document and you need one or two extra words, you can probably get away with exceeding the word limit by such a small amount. Some colleges will actually tell you that exceeding the word limit by 1-2 words is fine. However, I advise against exceeding the word limit unless it's explicitly allowed for a few reasons:

First, you might not be able to. If you have to copy-paste it into a text box, your essay might get cut off and you'll have to trim it down anyway.

If you exceed the word limit in a noticeable way, the admissions counselor may just stop reading your essay past that point. This is not good for you.

Following directions is actually a very important part of the college application process. You need to follow directions to get your letters of recommendation, upload your essays, send supplemental materials, get your test scores sent, and so on and so forth. So it's just a good general rule to follow whatever instructions you've been given by the institution. Better safe than sorry!

Can I Go Under the Word Limit?

If you can truly get your point across well beneath the word limit, it's probably fine. Brevity is not necessarily a bad thing in writing just so long as you are clear, cogent, and communicate what you want to.

However, most college essays have pretty tight word limits anyways. So if you're writing 300 words for an essay with a 500-word limit, ask yourself: is there anything more you could say to elaborate on or support your points? Consult with a parent, friend, or teacher on where you could elaborate with more detail or expand your points.

Also, if the college gives you a word range, you absolutely need to at least hit the bottom end of the range. So if you get a range from the institution, like 400-500 words, you need to write at least 400 words. If you write less, it will come across like you have nothing to say, which is not an impression you want to give.

What If There Is No Word Limit?

Some colleges don't give you a word limit for one or more of your essay prompts. This can be a little stressful, but the prompts generally fall into a few categories:

Writing Sample

Some colleges don't provide a hard-and-fast word limit because they want a writing sample from one of your classes. In this case, a word limit would be very limiting to you in terms of which assignments you could select from.

For an example of this kind of prompt, check out essay Option B at Amherst :

"Submit a graded paper from your junior or senior year that best represents your writing skills and analytical abilities. We are particularly interested in your ability to construct a tightly reasoned, persuasive argument that calls upon literary, sociological or historical evidence. You should NOT submit a laboratory report, journal entry, creative writing sample or in-class essay."

While there is usually no word limit per se, colleges sometimes provide a general page guideline for writing samples. In the FAQ for Option B , Amherst clarifies, "There is no hard-and-fast rule for official page limit. Typically, we anticipate a paper of 4-5 pages will provide adequate length to demonstrate your analytical abilities. Somewhat longer papers can also be submitted, but in most cases should not exceed 8-10 pages."

So even though there's no word limit, they'd like somewhere in the 4-10 pages range. High school students are not usually writing papers that are longer than 10 pages anyways, so that isn't very limiting.

Implicit Length Guideline

Sometimes, while there's no word (or even page) limit, there's still an implicit length guideline. What do I mean by this?

See, for example, this Western Washington University prompt :

“Describe one or more activities you have been involved in that have been particularly meaningful. What does your involvement say about the communities, identities or causes that are important to you?”

While there’s no page or word limit listed here, further down on page the ‘essay tips’ section explains that “ most essay responses are about 500 words, ” though “this is only a recommendation, not a firm limit.” This gives you an idea of what’s reasonable. A little longer or shorter than 500 words would be appropriate here. That’s what I mean by an “implicit” word limit—there is a reasonable length you could go to within the boundaries of the prompt.

But what's the proper coffee-to-paragraph ratio?

Treasure Hunt

There is also the classic "treasure hunt" prompt. No, it's not a prompt about a treasure hunt. It's a prompt where there are no length guidelines given, but if you hunt around on the rest of the website you can find length guidelines.

For example, the University of Chicago provides seven "Extended Essay" prompts . You must write an essay in response to one prompt of your choosing, but nowhere on the page is there any guidance about word count or page limit.

However, many colleges provide additional details about their expectations for application materials, including essays, on FAQ pages, which is true of the University of Chicago. On the school’s admissions Frequently Asked Questions page , they provide the following length guidelines for the supplemental essays: 

“We suggest that you note any word limits for Coalition or Common Application essays; however, there are no strict word limits on the UChicago Supplement essays. For the extended essay (where you choose one of several prompts), we suggest that you aim for around 650 words. While we won't, as a rule, stop reading after 650 words, we're only human and cannot promise that an overly wordy essay will hold our attention indefinitely. For the “Why UChicago?” essay, we suggest about 250-500 words. The ideas in your writing matter more than the exact number of words you use!”

So there you go! You want to be (loosely) in the realm of 650 for the extended essay, and 250-500 words for the “Why UChicago?” essay.

Help! There Really Is No Guidance on Length

If you really can't find any length guidelines anywhere on the admissions website and you're at a loss, I advise calling the admissions office. They may not be able to give you an exact number (in fact, they probably won't), but they will probably at least be able to tell you how long most of the essays they see are. (And keep you from writing a panicked, 20-page dissertation about your relationship with your dog).

In general, 500 words or so is pretty safe for a college essay. It's a fairly standard word limit length, in fact. (And if you're wondering, that's about a page and a half double-spaced.) 500 words is long enough to develop a basic idea while still getting a point across quickly—important when admissions counselors have thousands of essays to read!

"See? It says 500 words right there in tiny font!"

The Final Word: How Long Should a College Essay Be?

The best college essay length is usually pretty straightforward: you want to be right under or at the provided word limit. If you go substantially past the word limit, you risk having your essay cut off by an online application form or having the admissions officer just not finish it. And if you're too far under the word limit, you may not be elaborating enough.

What if there is no word limit? Then how long should a college essay be? In general, around 500 words is a pretty safe approximate word amount for a college essay—it's one of the most common word limits, after all!

Here's guidance for special cases and hunting down word limits:

If it's a writing sample of your graded academic work, the length either doesn't matter or there should be some loose page guidelines.

There also may be implicit length guidelines. For example, if a prompt says to write three paragraphs, you'll know that writing six sentences is definitely too short, and two single-spaced pages is definitely too long.

You might not be able to find length guidelines in the prompt, but you could still hunt them up elsewhere on the website. Try checking FAQs or googling your chosen school name with "admissions essay word limit."

If there really is no word limit, you can call the school to try to get some guidance.

With this advice, you can be sure you've got the right college essay length on lockdown!

Hey, writing about yourself can even be fun!

What's Next?

Need to ask a teacher or friend for help with your essay? See our do's and dont's to getting college essay advice .

If you're lacking in essay inspiration, see our guide to brainstorming college essay ideas . And here's our guide to starting out your essay perfectly!

Looking for college essay examples? See 11 places to find college essay examples and 145 essay examples with analysis !

Ellen has extensive education mentorship experience and is deeply committed to helping students succeed in all areas of life. She received a BA from Harvard in Folklore and Mythology and is currently pursuing graduate studies at Columbia University.

Ask a Question Below

Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!

Improve With Our Famous Guides

• For All Students

The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 160+ SAT Points

How to Get a Perfect 1600, by a Perfect Scorer

Series: How to Get 800 on Each SAT Section:

Score 800 on SAT Math

Score 800 on SAT Reading

Score 800 on SAT Writing

Series: How to Get to 600 on Each SAT Section:

Score 600 on SAT Math

Score 600 on SAT Reading

Score 600 on SAT Writing

Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests

What SAT Target Score Should You Be Aiming For?

15 Strategies to Improve Your SAT Essay

The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 4+ ACT Points

How to Get a Perfect 36 ACT, by a Perfect Scorer

Series: How to Get 36 on Each ACT Section:

36 on ACT English

36 on ACT Math

36 on ACT Reading

36 on ACT Science

Series: How to Get to 24 on Each ACT Section:

24 on ACT English

24 on ACT Math

24 on ACT Reading

24 on ACT Science

What ACT target score should you be aiming for?

ACT Vocabulary You Must Know

ACT Writing: 15 Tips to Raise Your Essay Score

How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League

How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA

How to Write an Amazing College Essay

What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?

Is the ACT easier than the SAT? A Comprehensive Guide

Should you retake your SAT or ACT?

When should you take the SAT or ACT?

Stay Informed

Get the latest articles and test prep tips!

Looking for Graduate School Test Prep?

Check out our top-rated graduate blogs here:

GRE Online Prep Blog

GMAT Online Prep Blog

TOEFL Online Prep Blog

Holly R. "I am absolutely overjoyed and cannot thank you enough for helping me!”

• Have your assignments done by seasoned writers. 24/7
• Contact us:
• +1 (213) 221-0069
• [email protected]

How to Write a Long Essay, Term Paper or Research Paper

How To Format a Long Essay

A long essay is an essay longer than 3 pages. This varies with the level of education. Some college instructors will view a five-page essay as short and others as average.

The phrase ‘long essay’ can be used to refer to the number of words, the number of pages, and sometimes the number of paragraphs. Most instructors usually clarify how long essays should be before issuing them.

What Is A Long Essay In Research?

A long essay in research is a ten-page or more essay that analyses, interprets, and compares researched ideas to the ideas of the writer.

Research papers are usually longer than academic essays. They are usually more detailed and test writing and scholarly research skills.

People Also Read: Essay Writing Topics with Answers:21 Examples in English

How to Write Long Essays

Most students complain that it is overwhelming to write long essays. The stress that comes with writing long essays contributes to many students wanting to put them off. Tackling long essays can become easy by following the following steps:

1. Pick a Topic

When granted the freedom to choose a topic, pick a broad and specific one. It is easy to find and write about a broad topic.

Topics with scarce research material generate little content and are not suitable for long essays.

One may likely end up getting stranded halfway into the essay with nothing more to write about on a topic. For example, the effects of Racism in America in the 2000s is a broader topic than the effects of racism in America in 2004.

2. Start your Research

Researching on a long essay can take hours and days. Thorough research is important in the formulation of a thesis. It makes it easy to determine the sources that are more important and valuable to your topic. The more sources you get the better and longer your essay will be.

3. Write a Thesis

The thesis statement is crucial because its shapes your entire essay. The thesis statement you formulate should be specific.

It should outline the main argument that you will try making in the essay. Use the thesis to explain why the question you want to answer is important.

In long essays, thesis statements should appear at the end of the first paragraph or on the second paragraph.

4. Finish your Research

With the thesis statement already established, continue doing research. The research should focus on the points that support the thesis statement you have come up with.

Any point that does not align with the thesis statement is not meant for your essay. All the sources you use for research should help develop your thesis statement. The sources should be credible and authentic to strongly support the thesis.

5. Make an Outline

An outline helps you organize thoughts and plan how you will write your essay. Without outlines, you are likely to get lost in the middle of your essay.

With an outline, writing is easy and fast with an organized flow of ideas. The more detailed your outline is the more ease you will have when writing the essay.

6. Write the Essay

Start writing your essay. Keep your head down and avoid distraction. Read through your writing to make sure that your ideas flow and paragraphs connect.

7. Proofread and Edit

You should read your paper out loud when proofreading.

This helps you notice any grammatical, punctuation, or paraphrasing errors in your essay.

You can choose to edit the errors as you read or write them down and correct them once you are done proofreading.

People Also Read: Essay Writing Titles: Being Creative Without Topic Generators

How to Balance your Points in a Long Essay

Formulate a thesis.

To balance your points in an essay you first need a thesis statement. A thesis statement will set the tone of how your points will be balanced.

With the thesis, you will be able to understand your essay better. This in turn helps you balance your points.

Write the introduction paragraph

Introduce your essay in the best way possible. Make it clear what you will talk about in your essay. Do not use fancy language that the reader will find hard to understand. At the end of the introduction paragraph write the thesis statement.

Supportive paragraphs

These are paragraphs that make up the body of your essay. They explain all points in your essay. Each point should be represented in its paragraph.

The first sentence of each paragraph is the topic sentence that states the point you will talk about. Explain the points exhaustively as the paragraph progresses.

People Also Read: Linking Words for Essay Writing: Useful Paragraph Phrases

The conclusion summarizes everything you have talked about in the essay. If readers happen to read the conclusion only they should grasp everything about your essay.

If writing a conclusion is hard, you can use your thesis statement as the conclusion because it also presents what your essay is all about.

Tips on How to Format a Long Essay

Instructors give long essays to their students to test their writing skills. An example of such a long task is writing a 4000-word essay that can take someone quite some time. The standard essay format is introduction, body, and conclusion.

The format for long essays includes two introduction paragraphs, 3 ideas in the body with each idea presented in four paragraphs, and a conclusion. This gives the writer the chance to achieve the given length.

People Also Read: Is Using an Essay Writing Service Cheating: It’s Legal

How to Make an Essay Long the Smart Way

Essays can be made long in the following way:

1. Expanding descriptions

Descriptions are very important, especially in descriptive essays.

Even if you have defined them you can add more information to make them more detailed.

2. Enhancing transitions

Transitions not only enable the reader to smoothly navigate through your points but also add length to your essay.

Additionally, great transitions make your essay better and are signs of a great writer.

This is different for short essays. Read more on how to write short essays to know why long transitions may not be included.

3. Expanding paragraphs

Go through your essay and find points that are not explained clearly and explain them clearly.

You can’t know everything about a topic. There will be always relevant information to add to the points of your essay. You can explain the basics if you did not do so and define important terms as well.

4. Adding the Introduction

No rule states that introductions should be short. They should be detailed because they tell the reader what to expect and set the tone for your essay. If you rushed over the introduction revise it and add more ideas to make it detailed and catchier.

5. Make sure that you have Included Everything

Revisit your outline and check whether you have included all the points you wanted to in the essay. If not, add them. Sometimes you may rush when writing the essay and forget to include all the points you intended to.

6. Checking the Assignment Again

Reading the assignment again can help you think of new ideas to include in your essay. This is because you may not have exhausted everything on the topic and reading the assignment again can open up your mind to a new thinking dimension. Also, you may have missed something in the instructions that you should add to the essay.

7. Add Quotations

Quotations help show the reader that you understand what you are writing about. You can bring in two quotes from famous writers to support your arguments. Always remember to cite and reference them to avoid plagiarism.

8. Asking a Friend what is Missing

After doing all of the above and still not achieving the length you want, ask a friend to read your essay. They will help you identify what is missing and unclear in your work. It is not easy receiving constructive criticism in your work but that is one way to make it better.

When not handling complex essays and academic writing tasks, Josh is busy advising students on how to pass assignments. In spare time, he loves playing football or walking with his dog around the park.

Related posts

Check My Essay Grade

Check My Essay Grade: How To Rate Your Essay

Is Essay a Genre

Is Essay a Genre of Literature: Its Structure and Examples

check my essay

Check My Essay Free From Grammar, Plagiarism, To Quality

What are the six different essay lengths?

This is the second of three chapters about Essays . To complete this reader, read each chapter carefully and then unlock and complete our materials to check your understanding.   

– Discuss why essays might vary in length

– Outline the six major lengths of academic essay

– Provide defining features for each essay length

Chapter 1: What is an academic essay?

Chapter 2: What are the six different essay lengths?

Chapter 3: What are the seven different types of academic essay?

Before you begin reading...

• video and audio texts
• knowledge checks and quizzes
• skills practices, tasks and assignments

The length of essay you’re assigned will likely depend on where you are exactly in your academic course. Generally, assignments at the start of a bachelor’s degree will be shorter than those required in a student’s final years, just like master’s  and doctoral-level essays will continue to increase in both length and difficulty.

1. The One-Paragraph Essay

Generally about 150 to 250 words in length, the one-paragraph essay may be assigned by academic tutors simply in order to practise the basic concepts of paragraph writing, or it may also be used for specific purposes such as to practise summarising an article that’s been read in class or to write an extended definition of a concept. Additionally, one-paragraph essays may also be used as a diagnostic to quickly determine the level of a student’s writing. Unlike other essay lengths, for the one-paragraph essay, you’ll need to include at least some introductory, body and conclusive elements within the same paragraph.    

2. The Three-Paragraph Essay

Usually around 500 words in length, the three-paragraph essay is generally used to introduce students to the concept that all essays should maintain an introduction , body section and conclusion if the writer wishes to produce cohesive and a logical writing. The introduction and conclusion will be the first and last paragraphs and tend to be a little shorter in length, while the central body paragraph will contain the essay’s content or argument. A simple table explaining the balance of content in a three-paragraph essay has been provided below:

3. The Five-Paragraph Essay

Around 1,000 words in length, the five-paragraph essay is generally set by tutors who are content that their students understand the introduction-body-conclusion essay  structure and wish to allow more freedom to expand the ideas and arguments presented by the writer in the body section of the essay. This length of essay still only dedicates one paragraph to the introduction and conclusion , but allows three paragraphs to be dedicated to the exploration of the theme in the essay’s body. At this length, certain essay types such as cause and effect essays or compare and contrast essays may now be utilised. The following is a simple diagram of the balance of paragraph lengths in a five-paragraph essay.

4. The Extended Essay

The extended essay is the most common type of essay that’s assigned during a bachelor’s or master’s degree , and it may be of any length – although it’s unusual for such essays to be above 5,000 words. The most common lengths for an extended essay are 1,500, 3,000 and 5,000 words, with a word count allowance of plus or minus 10%. Such essay types will most certainly require research and referencing skills , and may also begin to follow more complex structures such as are found in dissertations and theses rather than simply following the introduction-body-conclusion structure of shorter essays.

5. The Dissertation

Generally assigned as the final project for both bachelor’s   and master’s degree , the typical length of an academic dissertation is 10,000 or 15,000 words. Unlike shorter essay types , dissertations have more complex structures and are almost always based around primary research (original research that the writer has conducted themselves). The following table demonstrates some of the key parts of a dissertation as well as the rough word count  percentages for each section:

6. The Thesis

Finally, the thesis is the longest academic essay type and the one that’s reserved for doctorate students studying PhDs. Generally between 40,000 and 60,000 words in length, the doctorate thesis may contain all the elements of a dissertation but in much more detail and with more careful investigation. Such essays  are almost certainly original and are based on primary research , with a larger focus on the accuracy of the literature review , data collection and data analysis . Many students will never encounter this essay type. 

Once you can recognise which essay length you’ve been assigned, the next question covered in Chapter 3 is about determining the type of essay you have to write. This is because each essay type will require particular styles, structures, foci and language.

To reference this reader:

Academic Marker (2022) Essays . Available at: https://academicmarker.com/academic-guidance/assignments/essays/ (Accessed: Date Month Year).

• Harvard Writing Center
• Leeds University Library
• Purdue Online Writing Lab

Downloadables

Once you’ve completed all three chapters about essays , you might also wish to download our beginner, intermediate and advanced worksheets to test your progress or print for your students. These professional PDF worksheets can be easily accessed for only a few Academic Marks .

Our essays academic reader (including all four chapters about this topic) can be accessed here at the click of a button.

Gain unlimited access to our essays  beginner worksheet, with activities and answer keys designed to check a basic understanding of this reader’s chapters.

To check a confident understanding of this reader’s chapters, click on the button below to download our  essays   intermediate worksheet with activities and answer keys.

Our essays  advanced worksheet with activities and answer keys has been created to check a sophisticated understanding of this reader’s chapters. 

To save yourself 5 Marks , click on the button below to gain unlimited access to all of our essays chapters and worksheets. The All-in-1 Pack includes every chapter in this reader, as well as our beginner, intermediate and advanced worksheets in one handy PDF.

Click on the button below to gain unlimited access to our essays  teacher’s PowerPoint, which should include everything you’d need to successfully introduce this topic.

Collect Academic Marks

• 100 Marks for joining
• 25 Marks for daily e-learning
• 100-200 for feedback/testimonials
• 100-500 for referring your colleages/friends

How Long Is an Essay? The Ultimate Essay Length Guide

It’s safe to say that most students struggle with the word limit within an essay. Sometimes, it’s hard to find ideas for a text and meet the word requirement for every part of the paper. With so many factors influencing essay length, it’s easy to get confused.

Our specialists will write a custom essay specially for you!

Luckily, our custom-writing team has your back. In this article, our custom-writing experts will answer all your questions regarding essay length. We will also help you write papers with an ideal number of words!

📜 Is Essay Length Important?

📏 essay parts: recommended length.

• 🤔 How to Make Essays Shorter or Longer
• 📑 Essay Length & Formatting
• ❓ Different Academic Levels FAQ
• 📚 Essay Length: Different Types
• ⭐ Other Aspects
• 📝 Essay Examples

🔍 References

Often, the phrase “word limit” causes panic among students. After all, if an essay is too long or too short, your grade will be lowered. However, in reality, there’s nothing to worry about. When it comes to words, limitations are beneficial for both the students and the professors.

Let’s see what exactly it means.

Many people believe that the longer an essay is, the better. However, according to Frontiers, research shows that it’s a bias that couldn’t be further from the truth. A perfect-length paper is one that allows students to express their ideas and showcase their knowledge fully while keeping it clean and simple.

What Influences Essay Length

Various factors determine the length of an essay. Here are the most important ones:

Just in 1 hour! We will write you a plagiarism-free paper in hardly more than 1 hour

Let’s start with the essentials. Usually, assignment length is given as a number of words rather than pages. Unless your supervisor or instructor mentions any specific limitations, it’s acceptable to be 10% below or above the word limit.

It’s also worth knowing the 80/20 rule . According to it, the body should constitute 80% of the text, while the intro and the conclusion take up the remaining 20%.

Keep reading to learn more about the recommended length of each essay part. The main numbers are shown in the table below:

How Long Should an Introduction Be?

An introduction is the first section and the face of your essay. For that reason, it needs to be compelling and well-thought-out. Usually, it consists of 3 to 5 sentences or 50 to 80 words .

An introduction must have a hook, some background information, and a thesis statement. While the attention grabber and the thesis are usually brief, you may need 2 to 3 sentences for the background. To avoid going overboard, try to stay on topic and don’t add any filler.

Receive a plagiarism-free paper tailored to your instructions. Cut 15% off your first order!

How Long Is a Body Paragraph in an Essay?

The length of a body paragraph may vary. Sometimes, it can be limited to a single sentence. In other cases, it may take up a whole page. Usually, it’s recommended to have between 80 and 200 words (5-8 sentences) per body paragraph.

Since the paper’s body contains the most information, it’s necessary to explain and support your ideas properly. That’s why it’s no big deal if your body paragraphs go slightly over the word limit.

How Many Body Paragraphs Should Be in an Essay?

Like the word count, the number of paragraphs is determined by the type of paper and its topic. The minimum is 1. Generally, however, the body consists of 3-5 paragraphs , 1 for each argument.

To improve your paper’s structure, ensure that there are as many paragraphs as there are points in your thesis statement. Each one should have a purpose and support your arguments. If there’s any fluff, it’s better to get rid of it.

How Long Should a Conclusion Be?

Like the introduction, the conclusion consists of 50-80 words . It’s essential to keep it simple and only mention the central ideas. A weak concluding sentence may affect the reader’s understanding of the topic and spoil the overall impression of your paper.

Get an originally-written paper according to your instructions!

🤔 How to Make Essays Shorter or Longer: Best Tips

Undoubtedly the essay’s content is more important than the number of words you use. But there are times when students go more than 10-15% below or over the limit. Is there a solution to this problem?

Yes, there is! In this section, we will share the most useful tips to help you stay on point with your paper’s word count.

How to Make Essays Longer

Since having enough words is essential for a good grade, we’ve collected the best tips that can help you lengthen your essay without teachers noticing:

• Use relevant quotations.  You don’t need to litter your essay with citations, but using them whenever appropriate is a great idea. For instance, if you’re working on a book analysis, referencing a couple of direct quotes from the source text will make your essay more credible and increase the word count.
• Give examples.  Go through the claims in your paper and provide additional evidence where possible. It will make your essay longer and more informative.
• Use transitional expressions.  Adding transition words and phrases is a natural way of increasing the number of words. It will also improve your essay’s readability. 
• Add more references.  Providing references is always a good idea when writing a formal essay. That way, you will increase the number of words and make your paper more credible.
• Work on your descriptions.  If you struggle to develop new ideas, go over what you’ve already written and consider adding some descriptive words. It’s a great idea for creative essays to include more imagery. 

How to Shorten an Essay

Another struggle of academic writing is cutting down the number of words in your essay to meet a set limit. We are here to tell you that it’s not that hard. Writing straightforwardly and keeping your sentences short is a key to concise content. Here are several strategies you may use to tighten a lengthy essay:

• Choose the active voice.  It takes up less space than passive voice. Using it also makes your writing more professional and compelling.
• Remove needless transitions.  Transitions can indeed maintain the flow of the paper. But some transitional phrases can be easily removed.
• Get rid of unnecessary adverbs and adjectives.  Some students tend to overuse adjectives and adverbs. It adds wordiness to their writing.
• Avoid running starts.  Some students like to start their sentences with long phrases like: “there are,” “it is believed,” or “the fact that.” Getting rid of them makes texts much more concise.
• Delete “that.”  In most cases, the word “that” can often be easily removed from texts.

Another cool trick is to use our summarizing tool as essay shortener. Try it out!

📑 How Long Is an Essay Depending on Formatting?

As we mentioned earlier, the essay’s length is usually limited by the number of words. But sometimes, a teacher may ask you to write a specific number of pages. This is trickier because the amount of text you can place on the page depends on the formatting. By using the font size and spacing properly, it’s possible to make the paper visually longer or shorter. Let’s discuss it in more detail.

Essay Spacing: How Does It Affect the Length?

• Adjusting the spacing between lines.  Try to make the changes as slight as possible. For instance, if you were asked to double-space the paper, use 2.1 or 2.2 spacing instead. Another option is to slightly extend spaces between paragraphs.
• Extending the margin size.  You can increase the right and bottom margins by a quarter to make very subtle changes in length. For example, if the margins are 1 inch , you can set them at 1.25 inches instead. 
• Increasing the spacing between characters.  It is less noticeable than the line spacing. Still, try not to overdo it and keep the numbers between 1.2 and 1.5 . 
• Adjusting the footer.  Add a footer with page numbers to stretch the bottom margin even further.
• Lengthening the header.  You can extend your header by adding your name, e-mail address, or other relevant information. Another option is double-spacing it.

Length of an Essay: Font and Size

• Using the right type of font.  If your instructor didn’t specify which font you should use, go for the bigger ones. We suggest Arial, Bangla Sangam MN, Cambria, or Quicksand. They will make your text look longer without being too on the nose.  
• Using a bigger font size.  This is another technique that can come in handy. However, be careful and don’t increase your font by more than 0.1-0.5 pt.  
• Increasing the size of periods and commas.   This is one of the less noticeable tricks you can use. For instance, if your paper’s font is 12 pt. , increase it to 14 pt. only for punctuation marks. Italicizing periods and commas will also add several lines of length to your essay. 

What to Do if There Are No Length Guidelines

Sometimes a teacher sets no word limit for a written work. What to do in that case? Well, first, you can ask your professor to confirm if they have simply forgotten to mention it. But if that’s not the case, here are a couple of helpful solutions:

• Think of the paragraph number.  Sometimes, you may be given the number of paragraphs instead of words. In that case, you can decide on the number of words depending on how many paragraphs you have. 
• Think about the topic’s complexity.  The length of your paper is also directly dependent on the theme. If the topic is simple, 4-5 paragraphs will be enough. A more complex issue may require an in-depth explanation, so your essay can be 6-8 paragraphs long.

❓ Essay Length for Different Academic Levels FAQ

The length of the elementary school essay is usually short. Usually, a paper needs to have around 3-5 paragraphs, with 4-5 sentences per paragraph. Primary school essays can be 1-2 paragraphs long.

The word limit for a middle school essay is usually between 300 to 1000 words. The most common essay length is 500 words, which is about 5 paragraphs. However, it may differ from school to school.

The length of the high school essay may differ depending on the school and the complexity of the task itself. Usually, however, a paper can be between 300 to 1000 words long.

The length of the undergraduate college essay often falls within the range of 1500 to 2100 words. It translates into roughly 5-7 pages. 5 pages is the most common essay length at this level.

When it comes to the graduate school admission essay, the word limit is usually between 500 and 1000 words. It’s possible to go slightly over or below the set limit; however, it’s best to stick to the requirements as close as possible.

📚 How Long Should an Essay Be: Different Types

Now, let’s talk about different types of essays. How long should they be? Keep reading to learn about the length of college essays, short and extended ones, scholarship essays, and research papers.

How Long Is a College Essay?

When it comes to a college essay, it’s more important to stick to the word limit than with any other paper. Some teachers may refuse to read it unless it meets all the requirements.

The shortest limit for a college essay is about 250 words which is the shortest length of a Common App personal statement. It’s also rare to see a good college essay with over 650 words . So, an average piece usually has between 150 and 650 words ; you can go over or below the limit by 50.

How Long Is a Paragraph in College Essays?

A college essay usually consists of 4-5 paragraphs . One paragraph takes about 1/3 of the page, which is roughly 5 sentences . Each sentence corresponds with one of the following components:

• Topic sentence.
• Explanation.
• Transitions.

College Essay Length Requirements: Top 5 Schools

To understand the requirements for a college application essay even better, take a look at the table below. It showcases the top 5 schools and their length criteria for personal statements. Keep it in mind when writing your college essay:

How Long Is a Short Essay?

A short essay is usually 500 words long. Using 12pt Times New Roman font with standard margins and double spacing should result in about 2 pages of text.

Extended Essay Length

An extended essay is different from a short or a standard one. It requires extensive research and thorough explanation. That’s why the upper limit for this kind of essay is 4000 words . In this case, a typical essay length is 3500 words or 18 paragraphs .

Scholarship Essay Length

Generally, scholarship papers have a limit of 500 words , which is 1 page in length. Most scholarship programs provide additional requirements that indicate the minimum number of words or pages. If there are no set limitations, you can stick to the limit.

How Long Is a Research Paper?

Typically, a research paper is between 4000 and 6000 words long. Sometimes, there are shorter papers, which have around 2000 words, or in-depth ones with over 10000 words.

⭐ Other Aspects of Essay Length

When it comes to essay length, many different aspects come into play. Here, we’ve gathered all the essential information regarding an essay’s number of pages, paragraphs, words, and references.

How Many Paragraphs Are in an Essay?

Sometimes, it is more convenient to count paragraphs rather than words. Let’s now figure out how many paragraphs are in essays of different lengths. You may also check out the examples to see what such an essay looks like:

How to Count Paragraphs in an Essay Based on Word Count

You can also count the number of body paragraphs for your essay using the formula below:

Number of body paragraphs (average) = (TWC – TWC*0.16)/100

• TWC – total word count
• 0.16 – an average percentage of total word count for introduction and conclusion
• 100 – an average number of words per paragraph

How Many Pages Are in an Essay?

The number of pages in your essay may vary from subject to subject. But it’s still possible to determine the number of pages based on word count. Check out the numbers below to see the conversions with bonus examples:

You can also use a specialized calculator such as Word Counter to determine a number of pages in your essay.

What Does an Essay Look Like when Typed?

You might be wondering: what do essays of different lengths look like when typed? Well, here’s the table where you can find out the metrics for single- and double-spaced papers.

How Many Pages Are in a Handwritten Essay?

In case you need to turn in a handwritten paper, you should check out the table below.

Counting Words in a Handwritten Essay

If you don’t have enough time to count the words in your handwritten essay one by one, here’s what you can do:

• Count how many words there are in one line. Take the first and last lines and a line in the middle of a page. Let’s say there are 15, 14, and 15 words in them. Then, the average number of words per line is 15.
• Next, count how many lines there are on one page. Let’s say there are 17 lines on a page.
• Take the number of words per line and multiply it by the number of lines per page. In our case, we multiply 15 by 17. So, there are 255 words per page on average.
• Finally, multiply the number of words per page by the number of pages. If your essay has 3 pages, it is approximately 765 words long.

How Long Does it Take to Write an Essay?

It is crucial to know how long writing will take you, especially if you are working on an exam essay or just short on time. Note that you need to consider the time for typing and researching necessary to complete a piece. Research time may vary. Usually, it’s 1-2 hours for 200-250 words .

Below, we’ve gathered the average writing time for average and slower writing speed:

And here are the results in pages:

How Many References Does an Essay Need?

Another essential part of any composition is the reference list. Different academic levels require different references. You’ll find out how many of them should be in your paper in the table below!

📝 Essay Examples: Different Length

Finally, we’ve gathered some excellent sample essays of different lengths. Make sure to check them out!

We also recommend you check out our free essay samples sorted by pages:

• 1-Page Essay Examples
• 2-Page Essay Examples
• 3-Page Essay Examples
• 4-Page Essay Examples
• 5-Page Essay Examples
• 10-Page Essay Examples
• 20-Page Essay Examples
• 30-Page Essay Examples
• 40-Page Essay Examples
• 50-Page Essay Examples

Now you know all about essay length, word limits, and ways to lengthen or shorten your text. If you know other interesting tricks, make sure to share them in a comment! Good luck with your writing assignments!

You may also like:

• How to Write a Process Analysis Essay: Examples & Outline
• How to Write a Precis: Definition, Guide, & Examples 
• How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay: Examples & Guide
• How to Write a Narrative Essay Outline: Template & Examples
• How to Write a Formal Essay: Format, Rules, & Example
• Word Limits and Assignment Length: Massey University
• The Paragraph in the College Essay: California State University, Long Beach
• Introductions & Conclusions: The University of Arizona Global Campus
• How Long Should a Paragraph Be?: Daily Writing Tips
• Paragraphing (Length Consistency): Purdue University
• Hitting the Target Word Count in Your College Admission Essay: Dummies.com
• How Long Should Your College Essay Be? What is the Ideal Length?: College Vine
• Writing Personal Statements Online: Issues of Length and Form: Penn State University
• Pen Admissions: Essays: University of Pennsylvania
• Essay Questions: University of Michigan
• Essay Structure: Harvard University
• Components of a Good Essay: University of Evansville
• Write Your Essay: UNSW Sydney
• College Writing: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
• 21 Helpful and Easy Tips to Make an Essay Longer: Seventeen
• How to Make a College Paper Longer: ThoughtCo
• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to LinkedIn
• Share to email

Do you dream of being successfully admitted to college? Well, you probably know that admission is a long process that includes many challenging steps. One of them is a recommendation letter: a document written on your behalf that describes your characteristics as a student. If done well, such a letter...

Almost everyone feels insecure when they start working on their first resume. Suddenly there are lots of questions that need to be answered. What should I write? How should I write it? What should I include in my resume to make it more appealing? If you’re looking for answers to...

What’s the first thing we do when facing the unknown? We Google it, of course! Google is fundamental to our experience of the Internet. According to the statistics, more than 100 000 people press “search” on Google every second! At first glance, the process is straightforward. You type in what...

Ever heard of a smart egg tray? Welcome to 2024! Today, there are gadgets for everything, and the variety of intelligent devices available increases every day. Some of them can improve your life. Others seem a bit useless. Will a smart egg tray actually add value to your life, or...

Dorms become like a second home to many students during their university experience. And while dorm life can mean making new friends and having exciting adventures, adjusting to new routines is not always easy. Since most students who come to the dorms have no prior experience living outside their parents’...

Imagine you’ve just written a paper. You’re going to proofread it, right? But is proofreading enough to ensure the absence of any factual errors or unfounded conclusions? Can you say with 100% certainty that you cited every reference correctly? If you want to learn how to fact-check like a pro,...

Every year, millions of U.S. students decide which university they want to attend. Around 20% of students rely on college rankings to make their final decision. Over the last two decades, such rankings have significantly grown in popularity. But are these lists reliable? Which criteria can be trusted? And which...

Have you ever seen someone else’s success and thought to yourself: “Why can’t I do the same?” What was your thought process like? Perhaps you believed you lacked some innate quality. Or did you think you could have achieved the same thing if you had put in enough effort? The difference in these attitudes is defined by two distinct mindsets—growth or fixed. You will read all about them in this article by Custom-Writing.org. You’ll also...

Are you interested in having a side hustle? If you have a hobby you are passionate about, look no further. A hobby-based side hustle is a great way to spend time doing something you love, a great source of income, and a way to boost your resume! In this article by Custom-Writing.org, you will find: a list of 7 inexpensive hobbies available to anyone; ways to monetize them; their benefits for...

In 2024, online education remains one of the most searched terms. Not only can you undertake short courses, but it is now commonplace to get Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees online. Is this the right fit for you? Keep reading to find out! In this article, our custom writing team will:...

What is the number one reason for becoming a volunteer? You may already know that charitable organizations help people in need and allow everyone to make a difference. However, there are some material benefits as well. Volunteer experience can boost your career prospects: it increases your chances of getting into...

Are you excited about grammar? Have you ever read the dictionary for fun? Do you become enthralled by your textbooks? Whether you are a language nerd or not, crossword puzzles are here to help. In this article, you will find dozens of exciting puzzle resources to support your learning. You...

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Is a long essay always a good essay the effect of text length on writing assessment.

• 1 Department of Educational Research and Educational Psychology, Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany
• 2 Institute for Psychology of Learning and Instruction, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
• 3 School of Education, Institute of Secondary Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg, Switzerland

The assessment of text quality is a transdisciplinary issue concerning the research areas of educational assessment, language technology, and classroom instruction. Text length has been found to strongly influence human judgment of text quality. The question of whether text length is a construct-relevant aspect of writing competence or a source of judgment bias has been discussed controversially. This paper used both a correlational and an experimental approach to investigate this question. Secondary analyses were performed on a large-scale dataset with highly trained raters, showing an effect of text length beyond language proficiency. Furthermore, an experimental study found that pre-service teachers tended to undervalue text length when compared to professional ratings. The findings are discussed with respect to the role of training and context in writing assessment.

Introduction

Judgments of students’ writing are influenced by a variety of text characteristics, including text length. The relationship between such (superficial) aspects of written responses and the assessment of text quality has been a controversial issue in different areas of educational research. Both in the area of educational measurement and of language technology, text length has been shown to strongly influence text ratings by trained human raters as well as computer algorithms used to score texts automatically ( Chodorow and Burstein, 2004 ; Powers, 2005 ; Kobrin et al., 2011 ; Guo et al., 2013 ). In the context of classroom language learning and instruction, studies have found effects of text length on teachers’ diagnostic judgments (e.g., grades; Marshall, 1967 ; Osnes, 1995 ; Birkel and Birkel, 2002 ; Pohlmann-Rother et al., 2016 ). In all these contexts, the underlying question is a similar one: Should text length be considered when judging students’ writing – or is it a source of judgment bias? The objective of this paper is to investigate to what degree text length is a construct-relevant aspect of writing competence, or to what extent it erroneously influences judgments.

Powers (2005) recommends both correlational and experimental approaches for establishing the relevance of response length in the evaluation of written responses: “the former for ruling out response length (and various other factors) as causes of response quality (by virtue of their lack of relationship) and the latter for establishing more definitive causal links” (p. 7). This paper draws on data from both recommended approaches: A correlational analysis of a large-scale dataset [MEWS; funded by the German Research Foundation (Grant Nr. CO 1513/12-1) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant Nr. 100019L_162675)] based on expert text quality ratings on the one hand, and an experimental study with untrained pre-service teachers on the other. It thereby incorporates the measurement perspective with the classroom perspective. In the past, (language) assessment research has been conducted within different disciplines that rarely acknowledged each other. While some assessment issues are relevant for standardized testing in large-scale contexts only, others pertain to research on teaching and classroom instruction as well. Even though their assessments may serve different functions (e.g., formative vs. summative or low vs. high stakes), teachers need to be able to assess students’ performance accurately, just as well as professional raters in standardized texts. Thus, combining these different disciplinary angles and looking at the issue of text length from a transdisciplinary perspective can be an advantage for all the disciplines involved. Overall, this paper aims to present a comprehensive picture of the role of essay length in human and automated essay scoring, which ultimately amounts to a discussion of the elusive “gold standard” in writing assessment.

Theoretical Background

Writing assessment is about identifying and evaluating features of a written response that indicate writing quality. Overall, previous research has demonstrated clear and consistent associations between linguistic features on the one hand, and writing quality and development on the other. In a recent literature review, Crossley (2020) showed that higher rated essays typically include more sophisticated lexical items, more complex syntactic features, and greater cohesion. Developing writers also show movements toward using more sophisticated words and more complex syntactic structures. The studies presented by Crossley (2020) provide strong indications that linguistic features in texts can afford important insights into writing quality and development. Whereas linguistic features are generally considered to be construct-relevant when it comes to assessing writing quality, there are other textual features whose relevance to the construct is debatable. The validity of the assessment of students’ competences is negatively affected by construct-irrelevant factors that influence judgments ( Rezaei and Lovorn, 2010 ). This holds true for professional raters in the context of large-scale standardized writing assessment as well as for teacher judgments in classroom writing assessment (both formative or summative). Assigning scores to students’ written responses is a challenging task as different text-inherent factors influence the accuracy of the raters’ or teachers’ judgments (e.g., handwriting, spelling: Graham et al., 2011 ; length, lexical diversity: Wolfe et al., 2016 ). Depending on the construct to be assessed, the influence of these aspects can be considered judgment bias. One of the most relevant and well-researched text-inherent factors influencing human judgments is text length. Crossley (2020) points out that his review does “not consider text length as a linguistic feature while acknowledging that text length is likely the strongest predictor of writing development and quality.” Multiple studies have found a positive relationship between text length and human ratings of text quality, even when controlling for language proficiency ( Chenoweth and Hayes, 2001 ; McCutchen et al., 2008 ; McNamara et al., 2015 ). It is still unclear, however, whether the relation between text length and human scores reflects a true relation between text length and text quality (appropriate heuristic assumption) or whether it stems from a bias in human judgments (judgment bias assumption). The former suggests that text length is a construct-relevant factor and that a certain length is needed to effectively develop a point of view on the issue presented in the essay prompt, and this is one of the aspects taken into account in the scoring ( Kobrin et al., 2007 ; Quinlan et al., 2009 ). The latter claims that text length is either completely or partly irrelevant to the construct of writing proficiency and that the strong effect it has on human judgment can be considered a bias ( Powers, 2005 ). In the context of large-scale writing assessment, prompt-based essay tasks are often used to measure students’ writing competence ( Guo et al., 2013 ). These essays are typically scored by professionally trained raters. These human ratings have been shown to be strongly correlated with essay length, even if this criterion is not represented in the assessment rubric ( Chodorow and Burstein, 2004 ; Kobrin et al., 2011 ). In a review of selected studies addressing the relation between length and quality of constructed responses, Powers (2005) showed that most studies found correlations within the range of r = 0.50 to r = 0.70. For example, he criticized the SAT essay for encouraging wordiness as longer essays tend to score higher. Kobrin et al. (2007) found the number of words to explain 39% of the variance in the SAT essay score. The authors argue that essay length is one of the aspects taken into account in the scoring as it takes a certain length to develop an argument. Similarly, Deane (2013) argues in favor of regarding writing fluency a construct-relevant factor (also see Shermis, 2014 ; McNamara et al., 2015 ). In an analytical rating of text quality, Hachmeister (2019) could showed that longer texts typically contain more cohesive devices, which has a positive impact on ratings of text quality. In the context of writing assessment in primary school, Pohlmann-Rother et al. (2016) found strong correlations between text length and holistic ratings of text quality ( r = 0.62) as well as the semantic-pragmatic analytical dimension ( r = 0.62). However, they found no meaningful relationship between text length and language mechanics (i.e., grammatical and orthographical correctness; r = 0.09).

Text length may be considered especially construct-relevant when it comes to writing in a foreign language. Because of the constraints of limited language knowledge, writing in a foreign language may be hampered because of the need to focus on language rather than content ( Weigle, 2003 ). Silva (1993) , in a review of differences between writing in a first and second language, found that writing in a second language tends to be “more constrained, more difficult, and less effective” (p. 668) than writing in a first language. The necessity of devoting cognitive resources to issues of language may mean that not as much attention can be given to higher order issues such as content or organization (for details of this debate, see Weigle, 2003 , p. 36 f.). In that context, the ability of writing longer texts may be legitimately considered as indicative of higher competence in a foreign language, making text length a viable factor of assessment. For example, Ruegg and Sugiyama (2010) showed that the main predictors of the content score in English foreign language essays were first, organization and second, essay length.

The relevance of this issue has further increased as systems of automated essay scoring (AES) have become more widely used in writing assessment. These systems offer a promising way to complement human ratings in judging text quality ( Deane, 2013 ). However, as the automated scoring algorithms are typically modeled after human ratings, they are also affected by human judgment bias. Moreover, it has been criticized that, at this point, automated scoring systems mainly count words when computing writing scores ( Perelman, 2014 ). Chodorow and Burstein (2004) , for example, showed that 53% of the variance in human ratings can be explained by automated scoring models that use only the number of words and the number of words squared as predictors. Ben-Simon and Bennett (2007) provided evidence from National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) writing test data that standard, statistically created e-rater models weighed essay length even more strongly than human raters (also see Perelman, 2014 ).

Bejar (2011) suggests that a possible tendency to reward longer texts could be minimized through the training of raters with responses at each score level that vary in length. However, Barkaoui (2010) and Attali (2016) both compared the holistic scoring of experienced vs. novice raters and – contrary to expectations – found that the correlation between essay length and scores was slightly stronger for the experienced group. Thus, the question of whether professional experience and training counteract or even reinforce the tendency to overvalue text length in scoring remains open.

Compared to the amount of research on the role of essay length in human and automated scoring in large-scale high-stakes contexts, little attention has been paid to the relation of text length and quality in formative or summative assessment by teachers. This is surprising considering the relevance of the issue for teachers’ professional competence: In order to assess the quality of students’ writing, teachers must either configure various aspects of text quality in a holistic assessment or hold them apart in an analytic assessment. Thus, they need to have a concept of writing quality appropriate for the task and they need to be aware of the construct-relevant and -irrelevant criteria (cf. the lens model; Brunswik, 1955 ). To our knowledge, only two studies have investigated the effect of text length on holistic teacher judgments, both of which found that longer texts receive higher grades. Birkel and Birkel (2002) found significant main effects of text length (long, medium, short) and spelling errors (many, few) on holistic teacher judgments. Osnes (1995) reported effects of handwriting quality and text length on grades.

Whereas research on the text length effect on classroom writing assessment is scarce, a considerable body of research has investigated how other text characteristics influence teachers’ assessment of student texts. It is well-demonstrated, for example, that pre-service and experienced teachers assign lower grades to essays containing mechanical errors ( Scannell and Marshall, 1966 ; Marshall, 1967 ; Cumming et al., 2002 ; Rezaei and Lovorn, 2010 ). Scannell and Marshall (1966) found that pre-service teachers’ judgments were affected by errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling, even though they were explicitly instructed to grade on content alone. More recently, Rezaei and Lovorn (2010) showed that high quality essays containing more structural, mechanical, spelling, and grammatical errors were assigned lower scores than texts without errors even in criteria relating solely to content. Teachers failed to distinguish between formal errors and the independent quality of content in a student essay. Similarly, Vögelin et al. (2018 , 2019) found that lexical features and spelling influenced not only holistic teacher judgments of students’ writing in English as a second or foreign language, but also their assessment of other analytical criteria (e.g., grammar). Even though these studies do not consider text length as a potential source of bias, they do show that construct-irrelevant aspects influence judgments of teachers.

This Research

Against this research background, it remains essential to investigate whether the relation between essay length and text quality represents a true relationship or a bias on the part of the rater or teacher ( Wolfe et al., 2016 ). First, findings of correlational studies can give us an indication of the effect of text length on human ratings above and beyond language proficiency variables. Second, going beyond correlational findings, there is a need for experimental research that examines essay responses on the same topic differing only in length in order to establish causal relationships ( Kobrin et al., 2007 ). The present research brings together both of these approaches.

This paper comprises two studies investigating the role of essay length in foreign language assessment using an interdisciplinary perspective including the fields of foreign language education, computer linguistics, educational research, and psychometrics. Study 1 presents a secondary analysis of a large-scale dataset with N = 2,722 upper secondary school students in Germany and Switzerland who wrote essays in response to “independent writing” prompts of the internet-based Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL iBT). It investigates the question of how several indicators of students’ English proficiency (English grade, reading and listening comprehension, self-concept) are related to the length of their essays (word count). It further investigates whether or not essay length accounts for variance in text quality scores (expert ratings) even when controlling for English language proficiency and other variables (e.g., country, gender, cognitive ability). A weak relationship of proficiency and length as well as a large proportion of variance in text quality explained by length beyond proficiency would be in favor of the judgment bias assumption.

Study 2 focused on possible essay length bias in an experimental setting, investigating the effect of essay length on text quality ratings when there was (per design) no relation between essay length and text quality score. Essays from Study 1 were rated by N = 84 untrained pre-service teachers, using the same TOEFL iBT rubric as the expert raters. As text quality scores were held constant within all essay length conditions, any significant effect of essay length would indicate a judgment bias. Both studies are described in more detail in the following sections.

This study investigates the question of judgment bias assumption vs. appropriate heuristic assumption in a large-scale context with professional human raters. A weak relationship between text length and language proficiency would be indicative of the former assumption, whereas a strong relationship would support the latter. Moreover, if the impact of text length on human ratings was significant and substantial beyond language proficiency, this might indicate a bias on the part of the rater rather than an appropriate heuristic. Thus, Study 1 aims to answer the following research questions:

(1) How is essay length related to language proficiency?

(2) Does text length still account for variance in text quality when English language proficiency is statistically controlled for?

Materials and Methods

Sample and procedure.

The sample consisted of N = 2,722 upper secondary students (11th grade; 58.1% female) in Germany ( n = 894) and Switzerland ( n = 1828) from the interdisciplinary and international research project Measuring English Writing at Secondary Level (MEWS; for an overview see Keller et al., 2020 ). The target population were students attending the academic track of general education grammar schools (ISCED level 3a) in the German federal state Schleswig-Holstein as well as in seven Swiss cantons (Aargau, Basel Stadt, Basel Land, Luzern, St. Gallen, Schwyz, Zurich). In a repeated-measures design, students were assessed at the beginning (T1: August/September 2016; M age = 17.34; SD age = 0.87) and at the end of the school year (T2: May/June 2017; M age = 18.04; SD age = 0.87). The students completed computer-based tests on writing, reading and listening skills, as well as general cognitive ability. Furthermore, they completed a questionnaire measuring background variables and individual characteristics.

Writing prompt

All students answered two independent and two integrated essay writing prompts of the internet-based Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL iBT ® ) that is administered by the Educational Testing Service (ETS) in Princeton. The task instruction was as follows: “In the writing task below you will find a question on a controversial topic. Answer the question in an essay in English. List arguments and counter-arguments, explain them and finally make it clear what your own opinion on the topic is. Your text will be judged on different qualities. These include the presentation of your ideas, the organization of the essay and the linguistic quality and accuracy. You have 30 min to do this. Try to use all of this time as much as possible.” This task instruction was followed by the essay prompt. The maximum writing time was 30 min according to the official TOEFL iBT ® assessment procedure. The essays were scored by trained human raters on the TOEFL 6-point rating scale at ETS. In addition to two human ratings per essay, ETS also provided scores from their automated essay scoring system (e-rater ® ; Burstein et al., 2013 ). For a more detailed description of the scoring procedure and the writing prompts see Rupp et al. (2019) and Keller et al. (2020) . For the purpose of this study, we selected the student responses to the TOEFL iBT independent writing prompt “Teachers,” which showed good measurement qualities (see Rupp et al., 2019 ). Taken together, data collections at T1 and T2 yielded N = 2,389 valid written responses to the following prompt: “A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.”

Text quality and length

The rating of text quality via human and machine scoring was done by ETS. All essays were scored by highly experienced human raters on the operational holistic TOEFL iBT rubric from 0 to 5 ( Chodorow and Burstein, 2004 ). Essays were scored high if they were well-organized and individual ideas were well-developed, if they used specific examples and support to express learners’ opinion on the subject, and if the English language was used accurately to express learners’ ideas. Essays were assigned a score of 0 if they were written in another language, were generally incomprehensible, or if no text was entered.

Each essay received independent ratings by two trained human raters. If the two ratings showed a deviation of 1, the mean of the two scores was used; if they showed a deviation of 2 or more, a third rater (adjudicator) was consulted. Inter-rater agreement, as measured by quadratic weighted kappa (QWK), was satisfying for the prompt “Teachers” at both time points (QWK = 0.67; Hayes and Hatch, 1999 ; see Rupp et al., 2019 for further details). The mean text quality score was M = 3.35 ( SD = 0.72).

Word count was used to measure the length of the essays. The number of words was calculated by the e-Rater scoring engine. The mean word count was M = 311.19 ( SD = 81.91) and the number of words ranged from 41 to 727. We used the number of words rather than other measures of text length (e.g., number of letters) as it is the measure which is most frequently used in the literature: 9 out of 10 studies in the research review by Powers (2005) used word count as the criterion (also see Kobrin et al., 2007 , 2011 ; Crossley and McNamara, 2009 ; Barkaoui, 2010 ; Attali, 2016 ; Wolfe et al., 2016 ; Wind et al., 2017 ). This approach ensures that our analyses can be compared with previous research.

English language proficiency and control variables

Proficiency was operationalized by a combination of different variables: English grade, English writing self-concept, reading and listening comprehension in English. The listening and reading skills were measured with a subset of items from the German National Assessment ( Köller et al., 2010 ). The tasks require a detailed understanding of long, complex reading and listening texts including idiomatic expressions and different linguistic registers. The tests consisted of a total of 133 items for reading, and 118 items for listening that were administered in a multi-matrix-design. Each student was assessed with two rotated 15-min blocks per domain. Item parameters were estimated using longitudinal multidimensional two-parameter item response models in M plus version 8 ( Muthén and Muthén, 1998–2012 ). Student abilities were estimated using 15 plausible values (PVs) per person. The PV reliabilities were 0.92 (T1) and 0.76 (T2) for reading comprehension, and 0.85 (T1) and 0.72 (T2) for listening comprehension. For a more detailed description of the scaling procedure see Köller et al. (2019) .

General cognitive ability was assessed at T1 using the subtests on figural reasoning (N2; 25 items) and on verbal reasoning (V3; 20 items) of the Cognitive Ability Test (KFT 4–12 + R; Heller and Perleth, 2000 ). For each scale 15 PVs were drawn in a two-dimensional item response model. For the purpose of this study, the two PVs were combined to 15 overall PV scores with a reliability of 0.86.

The English writing self-concept was measured with a scale consisting of five items (e.g., “I have always been good at writing in English”; Eccles and Wigfield, 2002 ; Trautwein et al., 2012 ; α = 0.90). Furthermore, country (Germany = 0/Switzerland = 1), gender (male = 0/female = 1) and time of measurement (T1 = 0; T2 = 1) were used as control variables.

Statistical Analyses

All analyses were conducted in M plus version 8 ( Muthén and Muthén, 1998–2012 ) based on the 15PV data sets using robust maximum likelihood estimation to account for a hierarchical data structure (i.e., students clustered in classes; type = complex). Full-information maximum likelihood was used to estimate missing values in background variables. Due to the use of 15PVs, all analyses were run 15 times and then averaged (see Rubin, 1987 ).

Confirmatory factor analysis was used to specify a latent proficiency factor. All four proficiency variables showed substantial loadings in a single-factor measurement model (English grade: 0.67; writing self-concept: 0.73; reading comprehension: 0.42; listening comprehension: 0.51). As reading and listening comprehension were measured within the same assessment framework and could thus be expected to share mutual variance beyond the latent factor, their residuals were allowed to correlate. The analyses yielded an acceptable model fit: χ 2 (1) = 3.65, p = 0.06; CFI = 0.998, RMSEA = 0.031, SRMR = 0.006.

The relationship between text length and other independent variables was explored with correlational analysis. Multiple regression analysis with latent and manifest predictors was used to investigate the relations between text length, proficiency, and text quality.

The correlation of the latent proficiency factor and text length (word count) was moderately positive: r = 0.36, p < 0.01. This indicates that more proficient students tended to write longer texts. Significant correlations with other variables showed that students tended to write longer texts at T1 ( r = -0.08, p < 0.01), girls wrote longer texts than boys ( r = 0.11, p < 0.01), and higher cognitive ability was associated with longer texts ( r = 0.07, p < 0.01). However, all of these correlations were very weak as a general rule. The association of country and text length was not statistically significant ( r = -0.06, p = 0.10).

Table 1 presents the results of the multiple linear regression of text quality on text length, proficiency and control variables. The analysis showed that proficiency and the covariates alone explained 38 percent of the variance in text quality ratings, with the latent proficiency factor being by far the strongest predictor (Model 1). The effect of text length on the text quality score was equally strong when including the control variables but not proficiency in the model (Model 2). When both the latent proficiency factor and text length were entered into the regression model (Model 3), the coefficient of text length was reduced but remained significant and substantial, explaining an additional 24% of the variance (ΔR 2 = 0.24 from Model 1 to Model 3). Thus, text length had an incremental effect on text quality beyond a latent English language proficiency factor.

Table 1. Linear regression of text quality on text length, English language proficiency, and control variables: standardized regression coefficients (β) and standard errors (SE).

Study 1 approached the issue of text length by operationalizing the construct of English language proficiency and investigating how it affects the relationship of text length and text quality. This can give us an idea of how text length may influence human judgments even though it is not considered relevant to the construct of writing competence. These secondary analyses of an existing large-scale dataset yielded two central findings: First, text length was only moderately associated with language proficiency. Second, text length strongly influenced writing performance beyond proficiency. Thus, it had an impact on the assigned score that was not captured by the construct of proficiency. These findings could be interpreted in favor of the judgment bias assumption as text length may include both construct-irrelevant and construct-relevant information.

The strengths of this study were the large sample of essays on the same topic and the vast amount of background information that was collected on the student writers (proficiency and control variables). However, there were three major limitations: First, the proficiency construct captured different aspects of English language competence (reading and listening comprehension, writing self-concept, grade), but that operationalization was not comprehensive. Thus, the additional variance explained by text length may still have been due to other aspects that could not be included in the analyses as they were not in the data. Further research with a similar design (primary or secondary analyses) should use additional variables such as grammar/vocabulary knowledge or writing performance in the first language.

The second limitation was the correlational design, which does not allow a causal investigation of the effect of text length on text quality ratings. Drawing inferences which are causal in nature would require an experimental environment in which, for example, text quality is kept constant for texts of different lengths. For that reason, Study 2 was conducted exactly in such a research design.

Last but not least, the question of transferability of these findings remains open. Going beyond standardized large-scale assessment, interdisciplinary research requires us to look at the issue from different perspectives. Findings pertaining to professional raters may not be transferable to teachers, who are required to assess students’ writing in a classroom context. Thus, Study 2 drew on a sample of preservice English teachers and took a closer look at how their ratings were impacted by text length.

Research Questions

In Study 2, we investigated the judgment bias assumption vs. the appropriate heuristic assumption of preservice teachers. As recommended by Powers (2005) , we conducted an experimental study in addition to the correlational design used in Study 1. As text quality scores were held constant within all essay length conditions, any significant effect of essay length would be in favor of the judgment bias assumption. The objective of this study was to answer the following research questions:

(1) How do ratings of pre-service teachers correspond to expert ratings?

(2) Is there an effect of text length on the text quality ratings of preservice English teachers, when there is (per design) no relation between text length and text quality (main effect)?

(3) Does the effect differ for different levels of writing performance (interaction effect)?

Participants and Procedure

The experiment was conducted with N = 84 pre-service teachers ( M Age = 23 years; 80% female), currently enrolled in a higher education teacher training program at a university in Northern Germany. They had no prior rating experience of this type of learner texts. The experiment was administered with the Student Inventory ASSET ( Jansen et al., 2019 ), an online tool to assess students’ texts within an experimental environment. Participants were asked to rate essays from the MEWS project (see Study 1) on the holistic rubric used by the human raters at ETS (0–5; https://www.ets.org/s/toefl/pdf/toefl_writing_rubrics.pdf ). Every participant had to rate 9 out of 45 essays in randomized order, representing all possible combinations of text quality and text length. Before the rating process began, participants were given information about essay writing in the context of the MEWS study (school type; school year; students’ average age; instructional text) and they were presented the TOEFL writing rubric as the basis for their judgments. They had 15 min to get an overview of all nine texts before they were asked to rate each text on the rubric. Throughout the rating process, they were allowed to highlight parts of the texts.

The operationalization of text quality and text length as categorical variables as well as the procedure of selecting an appropriate essay sample for the study is explained in the following.

Text Length and Text Quality

The essays used in the experiment were selected on the basis of the following procedure, which took both text quality and text length as independent variables into account. The first independent variable of the essay (overall text quality) was operationalized via scores assigned by two trained human raters from ETS on a holistic six-point scale (0–5; see Study 1 and Appendix A). In order to measure the variable as precisely as possible, we only included essays for which both human raters had assigned the same score, resulting in a sample of N = 1,333 essays. As a result, three gradations of text quality were considered in the current study: lower quality (score 2), medium quality (score 3) and higher quality (score 4). The corpus included only few texts (10.4%) with the extreme scores of 0, 1, and 5; these were therefore excluded from the essay pool. We thus realized a 3 × 3 factorial within-subjects design. The second independent variable text length was measured via the word count of the essays, calculated by the e-rater (c) scoring engine. As with text quality, this variable was subdivided in three levels: rather short texts (s), medium-length texts (m), and long texts (l). All available texts were analyzed regarding their word count distribution. Severe outliers were excluded. The remaining N = 1308 essays were split in three even groups: the lower (=261 words), middle (262–318 words) and upper third (=319 words). Table 2 shows the distribution of essays for the resulting combinations of text length and text score.

Table 2. Distribution of essays in the sample contingent on text quality and text length groupings.

Selection of Essays

For each text length group (s, m, and l), the mean word count across all three score groups was calculated. Then, the score group (2, 3, or 4) with the smallest number of essays in a text length group was taken as reference (e.g., n = 22 short texts of high quality or n = 15 long texts of low quality). Within each text length group, the five essays being – word count-wise – closest to the mean of the reference were chosen for the study. This was possible with mostly no or only minor deviations. In case of multiple possible matches, the essay was selected at random. This selection procedure resulted in a total sample of 45 essays, with five essays for each combination of score group (2, 3, 4) and length group (s, m, l).

A repeated-measures ANOVA with two independent variables (text quality and text length) was conducted to test the two main effects and their interaction on participants’ ratings (see Table 3 ). Essay ratings were treated as a within-subject factor, accounting for dependencies of the ratings nested within raters. The main effect of text quality scores on participants’ ratings showed significant differences between the three text quality conditions ( low , medium , high ) that corresponded to expert ratings; F (2, 82) = 209.04, p < 0.001, d = 4.52. There was also a significant main effect for the three essay length conditions ( short , medium , long ); F (2, 82) = 9.14, p < 0.001, d = 0.94. Contrary to expectations, essay length was negatively related to participants’ ratings, meaning that shorter texts received higher scores than longer texts. The interaction of text quality and text length also had a significant effect; F (4, 80) = 3.93, p < 0.01, d = 0.89. Post-hoc tests revealed that texts of low quality were especially impacted by essay length in a negative way (see Figure 1 ).

Table 3. Participants’ ratings of text quality: means (M) and standard deviations (SD).

Figure 1. Visualization of the interaction between text length and text quality.

The experiment conducted in Study 2 found a very strong significant main effect for text quality, indicating a high correspondence of pre-service teachers’ ratings with the expert ratings of text quality. The main effect of text length was also significant, but was qualified by a significant interaction effect text quality x text length, indicating that low quality texts were rated even more negative the longer they were. This negative effect of text length was contrary to expectations: The pre-service teachers generally tended to assign higher scores to shorter texts. Thus, they seemed to value shorter texts over longer texts. However, this was mainly true for texts of low quality.

These findings were surprising against the research background that would suggest that longer texts are typically associated with higher scores of text quality, particularly in the context of second language writing. Therefore, it is even more important to discuss the limitations of the design before interpreting the results: First, the sample included relatively inexperienced pre-service teachers. Further research is needed to show whether these findings are transferable to in-service teachers with reasonable experience in judging students’ writing. Moreover, further studies could use assessment rubrics that teachers are more familiar with, such as the CEFR ( Council of Europe, 2001 ; also see Fleckenstein et al., 2020 ). Second, the selection process of essays may have reduced the ecological validity of the experiment. As there were only few long texts of low quality and few short texts of high quality in the actual sample (see Table 2 ), the selection of texts in the experimental design was – to some degree – artificial. This could also have influenced the frame of reference for the pre-service teachers as the distribution of the nine texts was different from what one would find naturally in an EFL classroom. Third, the most important limitation of this study is the question of the reference norm, a point which applies to studies of writing assessment in general. In our study, writing quality was operationalized using expert ratings, which have been shown to be influenced by text length in many investigations as well as in Study 1. If the expert ratings are biased themselves, the findings of this study may also be interpreted as pre-service teachers (unlike expert raters) not showing a text length bias at all: shorter texts should receive higher scores than longer ones if the quality assigned by the expert raters is held constant. We discuss these issues concerning the reference norm in more detail in the next section.

All three limitations may have affected ratings in a way that could have reinforced a negative effect of text length on text quality ratings. However, as research on the effect of text length on teachers’ judgments is scarce, we should consider the possibility that the effect is actually different from the (positive) one typically found for professional human raters. There are a number of reasons to assume differences in the rating processes that are discussed in more detail in the following section. Furthermore, we will discuss what this means in terms of the validity of the gold standard in writing assessment.

General Discussion

Combining the results of both studies, we have reason to assume that (a) text length induces judgment bias and (b) the effect of text length largely depends on the rater and/or the rating context. More specifically, the findings of the two studies can be summarized as follows: Professional human raters tend to reward longer texts beyond the relationship of text length and proficiency. Compared to this standard, inexperienced EFL teachers tend to undervalue text length, meaning that they sanction longer texts especially when text quality is low. This in turn may be based on an implicit expectation deeply ingrained in the minds of many EFL teachers: that writing in a foreign language is primarily about avoiding mistakes, and that longer texts typically contain more of them than shorter ones ( Keller, 2016 ). Preservice teachers might be particularly afflicted with this view of writing as they would have experienced it as learners up-close and personal, not too long ago. Both findings point toward the judgment bias assumption, but with opposite directions. These seemingly contradictory findings lead to interesting and novel research questions – both in the field of standardized writing assessment and in the field of teachers’ diagnostic competence.

Only if we take professional human ratings as reliable benchmark scores can we infer that teachers’ ratings are biased (in a negative way). If we consider professional human ratings to be biased themselves (in a positive way), then the preservice teachers’ judgments might appear to be unbiased. However, it would be implausible to assume that inexperienced teachers’ judgments are less biased than those of highly trained expert raters. Even if professional human ratings are flawed themselves, they are the best possible measure of writing quality, serving as a reference even for NLP tools ( Crossley, 2020 ). It thus makes much more sense to consider the positive impact of text length on professional human ratings – at least to a degree – an appropriate heuristic. This means that teachers’ judgments would generally benefit from applying the same heuristic when assessing students’ writing, as long as it does not become a bias.

In his literature review, Crossley (2020) sees the nature of the writing task to be among the central limitations when it comes to generalizing findings in the context of writing assessment. Written responses to standardized tests (such as the TOEFL) may produce linguistic features that differ from writing samples produced in the classroom or in other, more authentic writing environments. Moreover, linguistic differences may also occur depending on a writing sample being timed or untimed. Timed samples provide fewer opportunities for planning, revising, and development of ideas as compared to untimed samples, where students are more likely to plan, reflect, and revise their writing. These differences may surface in timed writing in such a way that it would be less cohesive and less complex both lexically and syntactically.

In the present research, such differences may account for the finding that pre-service teachers undervalue text length compared to professional raters. Even though the participants in Study 2 were informed about the context in which the writing samples were collected, they may have underestimated the challenges of a timed writing task in an unfamiliar format. In the context of their own classrooms, students rarely have strict time limitations when working on complex writing tasks. If they do, in an exam consisting of an argumentative essay, for example, it is usually closer to 90 min than to 30 min (at least in the case of the German pre-service teachers who participated in this study). Thus, text length may not be a good indicator of writing quality in the classroom. On the contrary, professional raters may value length as a construct-relevant feature of writing quality in a timed task, for example as an indicator of writing fluency (see Peng et al., 2020 ).

Furthermore, text length as a criterion of quality cannot be generalized over different text types at random. The genres which are taught in EFL courses, or assessed in EFL exams, differ considerably with respect to expected length. In five paragraph essays, for example, developing an argument requires a certain scope and attention to detail, so that text length is a highly salient feature for overall text quality. The same might not be true for e-mail writing, a genre frequently taught in EFL classrooms ( Fleckenstein et al., in press ). E-mails are usually expected to be concise and to the point, so that longer texts might seem prolix, or rambling. Such task-specific demands need to be taken into account when it comes to interpreting our findings. The professional raters employed in our study were schooled extensively for rating five-paragraph essays, which included a keen appreciation of text length as a salient criterion of text quality. The same might not be said of classroom teachers, who encounter a much wider range of genres in their everyday teaching and might therefore be less inclined to consider text length as a relevant feature. Further research should consider different writing tasks in order to investigate whether text length is particularly important to the genre of the argumentative essay.

Our results underscore the importance of considering whether or not text length should be taken into account for different contexts of writing assessment. This holds true for classroom assessment, where teachers should make their expectations regarding text length explicit, as well as future studies with professional raters. Crossley (2020) draws attention to the transdisciplinary perspective of the field as a source for complications: “The complications arise from the interdisciplinary nature of this type of research which often combines writing, linguistics, statistics, and computer science fields. With so many fields involved, it is often easy to overlook confounding factors” (p. 428). The present research shows how the answer to one and the same research question – How does text length influence human judgment? – can be very different from different perspectives and within different areas of educational research. Depending on the population (professional raters vs. pre-service teachers) and the methodology (correlational analysis vs. experimental design), our findings illustrate a broad range of possible investigations and outcomes. Thus, it is a paramount example of why interdisciplinary research in education is not only desirable but imperative. Without an interdisciplinary approach, our view of the text length effect would be uni-dimensional and fragmentary. Only the combination of different perspectives and methods can live up to the demands of a complex issue such as writing assessment, identify research gaps, and challenge research traditions. Further research is needed to investigate the determinants of the strength and the direction of the bias. It is necessary to take a closer look at the rating processes of (untrained) teachers and (trained) raters, respectively, in order to investigate similarities and differences. Research pertaining to judgment heuristics/biases can be relevant for both teacher and rater training. However, the individual concerns and characteristics of the two groups need to be taken into account. This could be done, for example, by directly comparing the two groups in an experimental study. Both in teacher education and in text assessment studies, we should have a vigorous discussion about how appropriate heuristics of expert raters can find their way into the training of novice teachers and inexperienced raters in an effort to reduce judgement bias.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ministry of Education, Science and Cultural Affairs of the German federal state Schleswig-Holstein. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.

Author Contributions

JF analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. TJ and JM collected the experimental data for Study 2 and supported the data analysis. SK and OK provided the dataset for Study 1. TJ, JM, SK, and OK provided feedback on the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Attali, Y. (2016). A comparison of newly-trained and experienced raters on a standardized writing assessment. Lang. Test. 33, 99–115. doi: 10.1177/0265532215582283

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barkaoui, K. (2010). Explaining ESL essay holistic scores: a multilevel modeling approach. Lang. Test. 27, 515–535. doi: 10.1177/0265532210368717

Bejar, I. I. (2011). A validity-based approach to quality control and assurance of automated scoring. Assess. Educ. 18, 319–341. doi: 10.1080/0969594x.2011.555329

Ben-Simon, A., and Bennett, R. E. (2007). Toward more substantively meaningful automated essay scoring. J. Technol. Learn. Asses. 6, [Epub ahead of print].

Google Scholar

Birkel, P., and Birkel, C. (2002). Wie einig sind sich Lehrer bei der Aufsatzbeurteilung? Eine Replikationsstudie zur Untersuchung von Rudolf Weiss. Psychol. Erzieh. Unterr. 49, 219–224.

Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychol. Rev. 62, 193–217. doi: 10.1037/h0047470

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burstein, J., Tetreault, J., and Madnani, N. (2013). “The E-rater ® automated essay scoring system,” in Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation , eds M. D. Shermis and J. Burstein (Abingdon: Routledge), 77–89.

Chenoweth, N. A., and Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: generating text in L1 and L2. Written Commun. 18, 80–98. doi: 10.1177/0741088301018001004

Chodorow, M., and Burstein, J. (2004). Beyond essay length: evaluating e-rater ® ’s performance on toefl ® essays. ETS Res. Rep. 2004, i–38. doi: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2004.tb01931.x

Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Crossley, S. (2020). Linguistic features in writing quality and development: an overview. J. Writ. Res. 11, 415–443. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01

Crossley, S. A., and McNamara, D. S. (2009). Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. J. Second. Lang. Writ. 18, 119–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.002

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., and Powers, D. E. (2002). Decision making while rating ESL/EFL writing tasks: a descriptive framework. Modern Lang. J. 86, 67–96. doi: 10.1111/1540-4781.00137

Deane, P. (2013). On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct. Assess. Writ. 18, 7–24. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.002

Eccles, J. S., and Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu. Rev.Psychol. 53, 109–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

Fleckenstein, J., Keller, S., Krüger, M., Tannenbaum, R. J., and Köller, O. (2020). Linking TOEFL iBT ® writing scores and validity evidence from a standard setting study. Assess. Writ. 43:100420. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2019.100420

Fleckenstein, J., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Reble, R., Krüger, M., Raubach, E., et al. (in press). “Was macht Feedback effektiv? Computerbasierte Leistungsrückmeldung anhand eines Rubrics beim Schreiben in der Fremdsprache Englisch,” in Tagungsband Bildung, Schule und Digitalisierung , eds K. Kaspar, M. Becker-Mrotzek, S. Hofhues, J. König, and D. Schmeinck (Münster: Waxmann

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., and Hebert, M. (2011). It is more than just the message: presentation effects in scoring writing. Focus Except. Child. 44, 1–12.

Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., and McNamara, D. S. (2013). Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: a comparison study. Assess. Writ. 18, 218–238. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002

Hachmeister, S. (2019). “Messung von Textqualität in Ereignisberichten,” in Schreibkompetenzen Messen, Beurteilen und Fördern (6. Aufl) , eds I. Kaplan and I. Petersen (Münster: Waxmann Verlag), 79–99.

Hayes, J. R., and Hatch, J. A. (1999). Issues in measuring reliability: Correlation versus percentage of agreement. Writt. Commun. 16, 354–367. doi: 10.1177/0741088399016003004

Heller, K. A., and Perleth, C. (2000). KFT 4-12+ R Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. Bis 12. Klassen, Revision. Göttingen: Beltz Test.

Jansen, T., Vögelin, C., Machts, N., Keller, S. D., and Möller, J. (2019). Das Schülerinventar ASSET zur Beurteilung von Schülerarbeiten im Fach Englisch: Drei experimentelle Studien zu Effekten der Textqualität und der Schülernamen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 66, 303–315. doi: 10.2378/peu2019.art21d

Keller, S. (2016). Measuring Writing at Secondary Level (MEWS). Eine binationale Studie. Babylonia 3, 46–48.

Keller, S. D., Fleckenstein, J., Krüger, M., Köller, O., and Rupp, A. A. (2020). English writing skills of students in upper secondary education: results from an empirical study in Switzerland and Germany. J. Second Lang. Writ. 48:100700. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100700

Kobrin, J. L., Deng, H., and Shaw, E. J. (2007). Does quantity equal quality? the relationship between length of response and scores on the SAT essay. J. Appl. Test. Technol. 8, 1–15. doi: 10.1097/nne.0b013e318276dee0

Kobrin, J. L., Deng, H., and Shaw, E. J. (2011). The association between SAT prompt characteristics, response features, and essay scores. Assess. Writ. 16, 154–169. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2011.01.001

Köller, O., Fleckenstein, J., Meyer, J., Paeske, A. L., Krüger, M., Rupp, A. A., et al. (2019). Schreibkompetenzen im Fach Englisch in der gymnasialen Oberstufe. Z. Erziehungswiss. 22, 1281–1312. doi: 10.1007/s11618-019-00910-3

Köller, O. Knigge, M. and Tesch B. (eds.) (2010). Sprachliche Kompetenzen im Ländervergleich. Germany: Waxmann.

Marshall, J. C. (1967). Composition errors and essay examination grades re-examined. Am. Educ. Res. J. 4, 375–385. doi: 10.3102/00028312004004375

McCutchen, D., Teske, P., and Bankston, C. (2008). “Writing and cognition: implications of the cognitive architecture for learning to write and writing to learn,” in Handbook of research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text , ed. C. Bazerman (Milton Park: Taylor & Francis Group), 451–470.

McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., and Dai, J. (2015). A hierarchical classification approach to automated essay scoring. Assess. Writ. 23, 35–59. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.002

Muthén, L. K., and Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

Osnes, J. (1995). “Der Einflus von Handschrift und Fehlern auf die Aufsatzbeurteilung,” in Die Fragwürdigkeit der Zensurengebung (9. Aufl., S) , ed. K. Ingenkamp (Göttingen: Beltz), 131–147.

Peng, J., Wang, C., and Lu, X. (2020). Effect of the linguistic complexity of the input text on alignment, writing fluency, and writing accuracy in the continuation task. Langu. Teach. Res. 24, 364–381. doi: 10.1177/1362168818783341

Perelman, L. (2014). When “the state of the art” is counting words. Assess. Writ. 21, 104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2014.05.001

Pohlmann-Rother, S., Schoreit, E., and Kürzinger, A. (2016). Schreibkompetenzen von Erstklässlern quantitativ-empirisch erfassen-Herausforderungen und Zugewinn eines analytisch-kriterialen Vorgehens gegenüber einer holistischen Bewertung. J. Educ. Res. Online 8, 107–135.

Powers, D. E. (2005). Wordiness”: a selective review of its influence, and suggestions for investigating its relevance in tests requiring extended written responses. ETS Res. Rep. i–14.

Quinlan, T., Higgins, D., and Wolff, S. (2009). Evaluating the construct-coverage of the e-rater ® scoring engine. ETS Res. Rep. 2009, i–35. doi: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2009.tb02158.x

Rezaei, A. R., and Lovorn, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assess. Writ. 15, 18–39. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003

Rubin, D. B. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation: comment: a noniterative sampling/importance resampling alternative to the data augmentation algorithm for creating a few imputations when fractions of missing information are modest: the SIR algorithm. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 543–546. doi: 10.2307/2289460

Ruegg, R., and Sugiyama, Y. (2010). Do analytic measures of content predict scores assigned for content in timed writing? Melbourne Papers in Language Testing 15, 70–91.

Rupp, A. A., Casabianca, J. M., Krüger, M., Keller, S., and Köller, O. (2019). Automated essay scoring at scale: a case study in Switzerland and Germany. ETS Res. Rep. Ser. 2019, 1–23. doi: 10.1002/ets2.12249

Scannell, D. P., and Marshall, J. C. (1966). The effect of selected composition errors on grades assigned to essay examinations. Am. Educ. Res. J. 3, 125–130. doi: 10.3102/00028312003002125

Shermis, M. D. (2014). The challenges of emulating human behavior in writing assessment. Assess. Writ. 22, 91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2014.07.002

Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: the ESL research and its implications. TESOL Q. 27, 657–77. doi: 10.2307/3587400

Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., and Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: a latent interaction modeling study. J. Educ. Psychol. 104, 763–777. doi: 10.1037/a0027470

Vögelin, C., Jansen, T., Keller, S. D., Machts, N., and Möller, J. (2019). The influence of lexical features on teacher judgements of ESL argumentative essays. Assess. Writ. 39, 50–63. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003

Vögelin, C., Jansen, T., Keller, S. D., and Möller, J. (2018). The impact of vocabulary and spelling on judgments of ESL essays: an analysis of teacher comments. Lang. Learn. J. 1–17. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2018.1522662

Weigle, S. C. (2003). Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wind, S. A., Stager, C., and Patil, Y. J. (2017). Exploring the relationship between textual characteristics and rating quality in rater-mediated writing assessments: an illustration with L1 and L2 writing assessments. Assess. Writ. 34, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.003

Wolfe, E. W., Song, T., and Jiao, H. (2016). Features of difficult-to-score essays. Assess. Writ. 27, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2015.06.002

Keywords : text length, writing assessment, text quality, judgment bias, English as a foreign language, human raters, pre-service teachers

Citation: Fleckenstein J, Meyer J, Jansen T, Keller S and KÖller O (2020) Is a Long Essay Always a Good Essay? The Effect of Text Length on Writing Assessment. Front. Psychol. 11:562462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562462

Received: 15 May 2020; Accepted: 31 August 2020; Published: 25 September 2020.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2020 Fleckenstein, Meyer, Jansen, Keller and Köller. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Johanna Fleckenstein, [email protected]

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

In 1960, when my world turned upside down

The demise of Bill Domjan's Plymouth just starts his story. He explains in his reader essay. Credit: Charles Thompson

After recently being hired as an engineer at the Sperry Gyroscope Company in Lake Success, I owned a new car for the first time. And there it was, my practically brand new 1959 Plymouth sedan, lying upside down on the shoulder of the Long Island Expressway.

My friend Charlie was there, camera in hand, saying, “Willy, you gotta do a handstand — it will make a great picture.” Then, two older women from streets adjoining the construction area walked over to ask if anybody had been hurt. When I said there were no injuries, one woman nodded knowingly and said, “Ah, they must have been good Catholics.” Well, not true.

Let’s turn back the calendar. It’s September 1960. The previous night, I had bought a bottle of vodka and planned to drink screwdrivers (orange juice and vodka) at a party in Forest Hills with my date, Jan.

However, unfamiliar with the effects of orange-flavored vodka, I became a “screwed driver” when we left the affair for our homes in Floral Park in my unseat-belted car. (Seat belts were not required then.)

Then it happened. While driving near the Grand Central Parkway exit, my eyes slowly closed, and my beautiful car hurtled up an immense pile of recently excavated earth (the LIE was still under construction). It rolled over in midair and came crashing down on the roof, the windshield shattering before my bloodshot and now wide-open eyes.

From our Editorial Board, get inside the local, city and state political scenes.

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our privacy policy .

Jan and I were left lying upside down inside on the ceiling, amazingly unscathed. We crawled from the wreck, and soon the police arrived, requesting my license and registration. Unfortunately, my wallet was in the trunk, and when it was opened — it now opened down — my basketball also fell out and I had to chase it down the LIE. (It seemed important at the time.) I gave the police the requested documents, and they gave me a ticket for “Failure to maintain control of a motor vehicle.”

Later that night, about 1 a.m., Jan and I got a ride home from a passerby. My car was left there, not blocking traffic and safely off the road, resting on its roof.

And now, not many hours after the accident, Charlie drove me back to the wreck and set about taking “the picture.” Ironically, lying near the car was a booklet that came with my vodka bottle: “How to Have a Vodka Party.”

A few days later, the car was junked, and although my car’s story ended, the picture’s story had just begun. I would periodically ask Charlie about it, and he’d say, “Yeah, I’ll find it one of these days.”

Eventually, I got married, had kids, and when they were grown, I told them of my misadventure and of the picture taken but never seen. After that, whenever my daughter, Bobbi, saw “Uncle Charlie,” she would ask about the picture, and he would tell her what he always told me, “Yeah, one of these days.”

Then at my son Stephen’s wedding reception in 1996, Charlie made a presentation — not to Stephen and his wife, Pamela — but to Bobbi, of a poster-size blowup of her father standing on his hands in front of his 1959 Plymouth resting on its roof.

The photo had been taken 36 years earlier, and I wasn’t sure it ever existed. But it did and now it hangs in my den, reminding me of that crazy night from the distant past.

Reader Bill Domjan lives in Melville.

SEND AN ESSAY about life on Long Island (about 550 words) to [email protected] . Essays will be edited and may be republished in all media. Include your full name, address and telephone numbers.

Find anything you save across the site in your account

The Hidden-Pregnancy Experiment

By Jia Tolentino

Shortly after I became pregnant with my second child, in the fall of 2022, I decided to try a modest experiment. I wanted to see whether I could hide my pregnancy from my phone. After spending my twenties eagerly surveilling and sharing the details of my life online, I had already begun trying to erect some walls of technological privacy: I’d deleted most apps on my phone and turned off camera, location, and microphone access for nearly all of the ones that I did have; I had disabled Siri—I just found it annoying—and I didn’t have any smart devices. For the experiment, I would abide by some additional restrictions. I wouldn’t Google anything about pregnancy nor shop for baby stuff either online or using a credit card, and neither would my husband, because our I.P. addresses—and thus the vast, matrixed fatbergs of personal data assembled by unseen corporations to pinpoint our consumer and political identities—were linked. I wouldn’t look at pregnancy accounts on Instagram or pregnancy forums on Reddit. I wouldn’t update my period tracker or use a pregnancy app.

Nearly every time we load new content on an app or a Web site, ad-exchange companies—Google being the largest among them—broadcast data about our interests, finances, and vulnerabilities to determine exactly what we’ll see; more than a billion of these transactions take place in the U.S. every hour. Each of us, the data-privacy expert Wolfie Christl told me, has “dozens or even hundreds” of digital identifiers attached to our person; there’s an estimated eighteen-billion-dollar industry for location data alone. In August, 2022, Mozilla reviewed twenty pregnancy and period-tracking apps and found that fifteen of them made a “buffet” of personal data available to third parties, including addresses, I.P. numbers, sexual histories, and medical details. In most cases, the apps used vague language about when and how this data could be shared with law enforcement. (A 2020 FOIA lawsuit filed by the A.C.L.U. revealed that the Department of Homeland Security had purchased access to location data for millions of people in order to track them without a warrant. ICE and C.B.P. subsequently said they would stop using such data.) The scholar Shoshana Zuboff has called this surveillance capitalism , “a new economic order that claims human experience as free raw material for hidden commercial practices of extraction, prediction, and sales.” Through our phones, we are under perpetual surveillance by companies that buy and sell data about what kind of person we are, whom we might vote for, what we might purchase, and what we might be nudged into doing.

A decade ago, the sociology professor Janet Vertesi conducted a more rigorous form of the hidden-pregnancy experiment. Using an elaborate system of code words and the anonymous browser Tor, she managed to digitally hide her pregnancy all the way up to the birth of her child. In an article about the experience, for Time , she pointed to a Financial Times report, which found that identifying a single pregnant woman is as valuable to data brokers as knowing the age, gender, and location of more than two hundred nonpregnant people, because of how much stuff new parents tend to buy. She also noted that simply attempting to evade market detection—by, for example, purchasing stacks of gift cards in order to buy a stroller—made her and her husband look as though they were trying to commit fraud.

I wasn’t going to do anything so strict or elaborate. I’d allow myself to text and send e-mails about my pregnancy, and to talk about it with my phone nearby. I assumed that, eventually, it would notice; I’d just wait and see when a diaper ad popped up on Instagram. I liked the idea of establishing a buffer zone between my psyche and the object that most closely monitors it. I found it almost shocking to remember that this was possible.

Pregnancy tends to erode both your freedom and your privacy. Past a certain point in your second trimester, strangers will begin reaching toward your stomach and telling you about the real difference between boys and girls. But I had eluded this during my first pregnancy, because COVID hit before I started showing. In the months that followed, I began to feel the difference between witnessing something and surveilling it, and to recognize that the most pleasurable moments in my life had occurred out of the reach of any oversight. I had felt then an almost psychedelic sense of autonomy; time was dilating, and the slow bloom inside me was beyond anyone’s reach. I wanted to see if I could feel anything like that again.

During pregnancy, and in the early days of parenthood, one is both the object and the conductor of intense surveillance. Last year, the artist and filmmaker Sophie Hamacher co-edited an anthology of writing on the subject, called “ Supervision ,” which was published by M.I.T. Press. “As I became absorbed with tracking and monitoring my child,” Hamacher writes in the preface, “I was increasingly aware that I was a subject of tracking and monitoring by others: advertisers, medical professionals, government entities, people on the street. I began to wonder about the relationship between the way I watched her and the ways we were being watched.” Surveillance encompasses both policing and caretaking, Hamacher notes. In practice, its polarized qualities—“beneficial and harmful, intimate and distanced”—intertwine. Baby monitors use technology developed for the military. Many contemporary models run on CCTV.

Most American households with young children use baby monitors or trackers; two recent surveys put market penetration at seventy-five and eighty-three per cent, respectively. (Both surveys were conducted by companies that make these devices.) And there are now countless other ways that technology will help you to observe and scrutinize your child: nanny-cam Teddy bears, G.P.S. stroller accessories, scales that track your baby’s weight over time, disks that can be affixed to diapers and which will notify you if your baby rolls onto his stomach while he’s asleep. Increasingly, such products use A.I. to detect signs of distress. “The need to know whether a child is safe and well is perfectly natural, which makes the nature of such surveillance appear innocent,” the writer and scholar Hannah Zeavin notes in “Family Scanning,” one of the essays in “Supervision.” But, she adds, “these technologies conceal the possibility of false positives, disrupted emergency services, and of collaboration with state forces—wittingly or unwittingly—all in the name of keeping children safe.” As a general rule, these devices don’t lead to better outcomes for the babies they monitor. More often—like social media, which promises connection as a salve for the loneliness created by social media—parenting tech exacerbates, even calls into existence, the parental anxieties that it pledges to soothe.

This has become a common pattern in contemporary life. Nearly a fifth of U.S. households are estimated to use doorbell cameras, many of them from Ring, the Amazon-owned company that has expanded its reach through police partnerships and a dedicated app that encourages users to post footage of strangers. Ring cameras haven’t made neighborhoods measurably safer, but they have made users measurably more paranoid, and placed more people, sometimes with grave outcomes, in contact with the police. Until recently, police could readily access surveillance footage from the Ring network without a warrant by posting requests on the app. It also gave its own employees and third-party contractors “ ‘ free range ’ access” to view and download videos from users’ homes.

In 2015, the company Owlet started selling a two-hundred-and-fifty-dollar Smart Sock, which monitored babies’ heart rates and oxygen levels, and alerted parents if these figures were abnormal. Although the company insists that it has made clear that the product is not intended to “treat or diagnose” sudden infant death syndrome—and there is no evidence that it reduces the risk of SIDS occurring—such devices are sometimes referred to as “ SIDS monitors.” But, in 2017, an opinion piece in the Journal of the American Medical Association cautioned physicians against recommending the product. “There are no medical indications for monitoring healthy infants at home,” the authors wrote. The device, they noted, could “stimulate unnecessary fear, uncertainty, and self-doubt in parents about their abilities to keep their infants safe.” The following year, a study in the same journal found “concerning” inaccuracies in oxygen readings. When Owlet went public, in February, 2021, the company had a valuation of more than a billion dollars; later that year, the F.D.A. issued a warning letter that the Smart Sock wasn’t an authorized medical device, and the company pulled it off the market. A million units had already been sold. The following year, Owlet launched a new version, called the Dream Sock, which would receive F.D.A. approval. Most of the reviews for the Dream Sock exude profound gratitude. Parents write about the peace of mind that comes from knowing the baby is being constantly monitored, about not knowing what they would do if the device didn’t exist.

Surveillance capitalism, Zuboff writes, “aims to impose a new collective order based on total certainty.” But little is certain when it comes to babies. The control that we feel when we’re engaged in surveillance almost always proves illusory, though the control, or at least the influence, that others exert on us through surveillance is real.

It is not a coincidence that Roe v. Wade, a ruling grounded in the right to privacy, was overturned at a time when privacy in the U.S was on its conceptual deathbed. There are other legal principles that might have served as a stronger foundation for abortion rights: the right to equal protection, or the right to bodily integrity. As Christyne Neff wrote, in 1991, the physical effects of an ordinary pregnancy and delivery resemble those of a severe beating—flesh lacerated, organs rearranged, half a quart of blood lost. Can the state, she asked, rightfully compel a person to undergo this?

Since Roe fell, two years ago, fourteen states have claimed that power in absolute terms, banning abortion almost completely. Two states have successfully passed abortion-vigilante laws, which confer the power of carceral supervision on the public. Indiana’s attorney general has argued that abortion records should be publicly available, like death records; Kansas recently passed a law that would require abortion providers to collect details about the personal lives of their patients and make that information available to the government. Birth control and sex itself may be up next for criminal surveillance: the Heritage Foundation , last year, insisted, on Twitter, that “conservatives have to lead the way in restoring sex to its true purpose, & ending recreational sex & senseless use of birth control pills.”

For many women in America, pregnancy was a conduit to state surveillance long before the end of Roe. Poor women, especially poor nonwhite women, are often drug-tested during pregnancy, and sometimes during labor and delivery, without their informed consent. Women who take drugs during pregnancy have been charged with child abuse or neglect, including in cases in which the drugs were legal; women who have miscarried after taking drugs have been charged with manslaughter, even homicide, even when no causal link was proved. Sometimes this happens because the woman in question had responded to billboards and service announcements promising to help pregnant people who are struggling with substance use. In multiple states, women have been taken into custody when the safety of the fetus was called into question. “To be pregnant and poor in the United States is to play a game of roulette with one’s privacy, presumed confidential relationship with medical providers, and basic constitutional and medical rights,” the law professor Michele Goodwin writes in “ Policing the Womb ,” from 2020.

Goodwin describes the case of a woman in Iowa named Christine Taylor, who, in 2010, as a twenty-two-year-old mother of two, was accused of attempted feticide after she fell down the stairs while pregnant. Part of the evidence cited by the police was that she reportedly told a nurse that she hadn’t wanted the baby. (Ultimately, prosecutors decided not to press charges.) The carceral surveillance of pregnancy entails the criminalization of ambivalence, the inspection of these innermost desires. But the deepest truths about motherhood seem to me to be rooted in conflicting, coexisting emotions: nightmare and rapture in the same moment during labor, the love and despair that box each other at night in the weeks that follow, the joy of cuddling my nine-month-old undergirded by the horror of knowing that other babies are starving and dying in rubble. Before I had my first child, I had badly wanted to get pregnant. I had planned for it, prepared for it, hoped for it. Still, when I saw the positive test result, I cried.

My modest experiment went surprisingly smoothly. Because I’d had my first child not long before, this time I didn’t need to buy anything, and I didn’t want to learn anything. I smooth-brained my way to three months, four months, five; no diaper ads. I called up a lawyer and data-privacy specialist named Dominique Shelton Leipzig to get her perspective. Globally, she told me, we generate 2.5 quintillion bytes—that’s eighteen zeroes—of data per day. “The short answer is, you probably haven’t hidden what you think you have,” she said. I told her about the rules I’d set for myself, that I didn’t have many apps and had bought nothing but prenatal vitamins, and that Instagram did not appear to have identified me as pregnant. She paused. “I’m amazed,” she told me. “If you didn’t see any ads, I think you might have succeeded.” I congratulated myself by instantly dropping the experiment and buying maternity pants; ads for baby carriers popped up on my Instagram within minutes.

I had felt little satisfaction hiding from the ad trackers—if anything, I’d only become more conscious of how much surveillance I was engaged in, as both subject and object, and how much more insidious the problem was becoming. We rarely have a clear understanding of what we’re doing when we engage in surveillance of ourselves or others. Life360, an app that’s used by more than sixty million people and is marketed as an easy way to track your child’s location via their smartphone, was found in 2021 to be selling raw location information to data brokers. (The company said it now sells only aggregate data.) In a Pew survey from 2023, seventy-seven per cent of Americans said they had very little to no trust in how social-media executives handle user data, and seventy-one per cent were concerned about how the government uses it. In another survey, ninety-three per cent of Americans said they wouldn’t buy a doorbell camera if it sold data about their family. People just want to be safer. I had wanted security, too, and affirmation—and I had wanted to be a writer. I had disclosed so much of my life to people I’ll never know.

My husband and I had not bought a baby monitor for our first child, a choice that satisfied his desire to not buy things and my desire to insist that certain aspects of experience are fundamentally ungovernable. But shortly after the second child was born she developed eczema, and started scratching her sweet, enormous cheeks in her sleep. One morning, my husband went to her and found that she’d clawed her face open, leaving blood smudged all over her sleep sack and smeared all over her face. “We need a video monitor!” I wailed, already Googling options. “We need to buy a video monitor today.”

We didn’t buy one, but for weeks I regretted it and second-guessed myself. And I surveilled the baby with technology in other ways all the time. In the early weeks, I relied on an app to tell me how much milk she’d drunk and how many soiled diapers she’d had that day—activities that I myself had witnessed just hours before. I felt like a Biblical angel with a thousand eyes, somehow unable to see anything. I took pictures because I knew I would have no memory of the precise contours of this exact baby in a month. When she didn’t seem hungry enough, I panicked, obsessing over every feed.

“What’s the line between pathological self-surveillance and care for a newborn? Is there one?” Sarah Blackwood, an English professor at Pace University, asks, in “Supervision.” Blackwood contrasts the “fantasy of efficiency and sterility” built into parenting tech with the “psychic state of watchfulness so many mothers find themselves in”—a state that is “metastatic, fecund, beyond.” One afternoon, my husband took the baby from me: she was sobbing, and I was incoherently frantic, trying to get her to eat. She was O.K., he told me; she’d eat when she needed to. But I know what’s good for her, and it’s my job to make her do it, I thought, furious. Around the fringes of my consciousness, I felt a flicker of understanding about how this idea that everything was controllable had become so ubiquitous, how we had confused coercion with care. ♦

New Yorker Favorites

The day the dinosaurs died .

What if you started itching— and couldn’t stop ?

How a notorious gangster was exposed by his own sister .

Woodstock was overrated .

Diana Nyad’s hundred-and-eleven-mile swim .

Photo Booth: Deana Lawson’s hyper-staged portraits of Black love .

Fiction by Roald Dahl: “The Landlady”

Sign up for our daily newsletter to receive the best stories from The New Yorker .

By signing up, you agree to our User Agreement and Privacy Policy & Cookie Statement . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

By Roz Chast

By Bruce Headlam

By Helen Shaw

By Louisa Thomas

A Dog Is a Mom’s Best Friend

As mothers—and as women—we are often held to impossible standards. On Mother’s Day, we’re grateful to the pets who love us for ourselves.

I found her in my mid-30s. I had just run for Congress in New York City, and lost spectacularly. Utterly humiliated, I spent most of my time alone, glued to my couch. My now-husband, Nihal, knew just how to cheer me up: we piled into a rental car, and drove to a farm in Pennsylvania.

I immediately knew she was the one: a beagle bulldog mix, seven pounds, all wrinkles and squat limbs and crooked teeth. Her soulful eyes had seen a lot in her brief lifetime, and she looked at me like she knew I had, too.

The Congressional race had left me broke, unemployed, and hardly able to afford my own life, let alone support another. But for some reason, I forked over what remained of my bank account, scooped up the dog, and home we went. I named her Stanley. It just suited her.

In the months to come, Stanley dragged me off the couch, forcing me to once again walk the streets of the city I loved. She licked the envelopes of the “I’m sorry I lost, I promise I will become something” letters I wrote to my supporters. She was utterly fearless, if a little bit shameless, unafraid to greet strangers with a goofy smile.

Stan was there to walk with me and turn the other way, when it seemed that all of New York City was just pregnant ladies pushing double-wide strollers. When I miscarried, and miscarried again, and then miscarried again, Stan was my soft tissue box, patient and still as I buried my head into her camel-colored fur and cried after receiving more bad news from the doctor. When I lay awake at night scrolling through fertility blogs, my belly bloated and sore from IVF shots, Stan was my weighted blanket, the sounds of her heavy bulldog breath eventually lulling me to a few hours of sleep. She didn’t judge me, and she certainly didn’t blame me.

When Mother’s Day rolled around year after year, and I still was not, technically, a mom, I considered that maybe Stan was my real baby. When I was with her, I would feel, however briefly, like I wasn’t a failure. To Stanley, I wasn’t a bad wife or bad candidate, bad woman or bad person. I was just Reshma. And I was loved.

She didn’t even mind, as a human sibling might, when two sticky, smelly, shrieking strangers came into our lives and took my attention—some of it, anyway—away from her. When I was 39, I welcomed my son Shaan, and then, a few years later, his brother Sai. Their S names were in Stan’s honor.

Stan adjusted well: watching over the boys, playing with them, and happily taking their food. But more than anything, she was a respite from the all-encompassing exhaustion of motherhood.

In summer 2020, as I spent my days furiously paddling to keep my head above water while looking after a newborn, a toddler, and a nonprofit gutted by COVID, Stanley was my rock. She still did not judge me, even when I accidentally left her in my building’s elevator for fifteen minutes on a particularly hectic day—a sign that I needed more help than I was willing to admit, and that maybe other moms did, too.

.css-1aear8u:before{margin:0 auto 0.9375rem;width:34px;height:25px;content:'';display:block;background-repeat:no-repeat;}.loaded .css-1aear8u:before{background-image:url(/_assets/design-tokens/elle/static/images/quote.fddce92.svg);} .css-1bvxk2j{font-family:SaolDisplay,SaolDisplay-fallback,SaolDisplay-roboto,SaolDisplay-local,Georgia,Times,serif;font-size:1.625rem;font-weight:normal;line-height:1.2;margin:0rem;margin-bottom:0.3125rem;}@media(max-width: 48rem){.css-1bvxk2j{font-size:2.125rem;line-height:1.1;}}@media(min-width: 40.625rem){.css-1bvxk2j{font-size:2.125rem;line-height:1.2;}}@media(min-width: 64rem){.css-1bvxk2j{font-size:2.25rem;line-height:1.1;}}@media(min-width: 73.75rem){.css-1bvxk2j{font-size:2.375rem;line-height:1.2;}}.css-1bvxk2j b,.css-1bvxk2j strong{font-family:inherit;font-weight:bold;}.css-1bvxk2j em,.css-1bvxk2j i{font-style:italic;font-family:inherit;}.css-1bvxk2j i,.css-1bvxk2j em{font-style:italic;} Although long labeled a man’s best friend, really, dogs are the best friend moms deserve.”

Later that year, as COVID exposed and exacerbated the struggles of American mothers, I launched Moms First to advocate for policies like paid leave and child care. And I started to pay closer attention to the ways moms were undervalued, underestimated, and held to impossible standards.

Although long labeled a man’s best friend, really, dogs are the best friend moms deserve. Sure, they’re a good proxy for having real, human children—the expenses, the accidents, the mysterious smells. But more than any of that, when we’re faced with the pressure to be perfect—by society, and by ourselves—dogs offer us a safe place to land: the kind of unconditional love that makes us feel like we can do anything. Like we are not, as I’ve spoken about before, imposters . It’s a gift every person deserves, but women rarely receive.

More than how to care for my children, Stanley taught me how to care for myself. How, in the face of mom guilt and mom bods and mom shame and mom penalties, I could give myself grace. Not as a gift, but as a given.

When Stan was diagnosed with cancer last spring, I thought my world had fallen apart. The veterinarians gave her three weeks to live; she lived for eight months.

I tried, every day, to be the companion to her that she was to me: cooking her fresh food every day, sneaking her gobs of peanut butter, taking her out in the middle of the night, as many times as she needed. I’d like to think that Stanley left me when she knew I could live life without her—a nice idea that provides little relief in the face of grief.

The week Stan died, Shaan turned nine. We held his birthday party at Benihana, an establishment I will probably never be able to visit again. I was devastated, irritated, and in absolutely no mood to celebrate, let alone marvel at an onion volcano. When a child complained that they didn’t like the chocolate cake, I wanted to yell, “I don’t care! Don’t you know I’ve just lost my baby?” Instead, the kid saw my glassy eyes and settled for some plain rice.

It was, to put it lightly, not Shaan’s best birthday. Once again, I felt like a failure.

But then, I thought of Stan.

Moms, and women generally, are cut such little slack. But through those watery, sparkling, soulful eyes, Stan saw me for me. Other people loved me despite my failures—Stan didn’t even see them.

And so, I do my best to honor Stan. To accept myself entirely, even when it feels impossible. To encourage the women in my life to do the same. To get off the couch, to walk through the neighborhood, to watch women with their babies, women with their dogs. To take comfort in knowing that someone loves them unconditionally—just like Stan loved me.

Reshma Saujani is the founder and CEO of Moms First and the founder of Girls Who Code. She is the author of instant national bestseller Pay Up: The Future of Women and Work (and Why It's Different Than You Think) . 

Life & Love

Celebrating My Plus-Size Body

‘She’s Not a Girl’s Girl’ Became the Worst Insult

What Led to Seema Bansal Chadha’s Viral Company

Was Working for a Billionaire Worth It?

Why Is Everyone Hiring a Wedding Content Creator?

He Left Me for Another Woman, So I Jetted Off Too

I’m Done Apologizing for Being a Strong Woman

Could Radical Pleasure Fix Your Relationship?

Is Fashion in Your Genes?

10 Chic Buys for Welcoming Holiday Guests

61 Surefire Gifts for Your New Boyfriend

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Guest Essay

Understanding My Son, One Game of Catch At a Time

By Jessica Shattuck

Ms. Shattuck is the author of the forthcoming novel “Last House.”

I have never played on an athletic team. As a child, I was not fast or coordinated or interested in anything that involved chasing, catching or otherwise playing ball. My mother, who grew up in postwar Germany, associated youth sports with the Hitler Youth and the Nazi obsession with fostering the “prey instinct” through competition and strength. These concerns dovetailed conveniently with my anti-gym-class feelings.

But in the long, cold and gloomy spring of 2020, I found myself the mother of an 8-year-old son who wanted nothing more than to play ball. This was the heart of early Covid; there were no organized sports, no activities, no babysitting, no school. Will’s older sisters (both teenagers) wanted no part in this activity. My husband was game, but Will’s appetite for catch was voracious. So I donned his spare baseball glove and let him teach me how to catch and throw.

American film and literature are threaded through with stories of fathers and sons playing ball, from Donald Hall’s essays “Fathers Playing Catch With Sons” to a father appearing on the baseball diamond in “Field of Dreams,” transcending death to participate in a game of catch with his son. I had always seen the game as a vaunted male tradition, laced with the pathos and psychodrama of inherited hopes and aspirations, the handing down of secret, implied codes of manhood.

But as I picked up a glove, the imagined maleness of the game offered me a certain freedom. I was not modeling what it means to be a man or re-enacting a ritual from my childhood. Will was not struggling to meet my expectations, even as I might be struggling to meet his. He was the teacher here. I got to appreciate his patience, his focus on detail, his encouragement.

We also weren’t talking. I am a writer who loves putting things into words, but Will doesn’t always love my questions or my boring mom-talk gambits. Here our closeness was measured in tosses, not words. Best of all, by the simple necessity of keeping the ball in the air, we were both fully present.

Will was an excellent coach: He broke the actions of catching and throwing down into a series of discrete steps: Crook your elbow just so, put your weight into the throw, follow through after release. Over — a lot of — time (lack of experience did not, in my case, conceal natural talent) I learned to overcome the frustration of a streak of bad throws or misses, to try less hard, sometimes, in order to do better, to take a breath and reset.

We fell into a rhythm and played for hours on our dead-end street. It wasn’t always fun: I became cranky when I repeatedly missed the ball. And on a cold day, it was hard to cheerily get off the sofa to go throw a ball outside.

Our game, miraculously, continued even after lockdowns were lifted. I still love the satisfying smack of the ball into the mitt, the almost magical feeling of stopping it midair. I like the thrill of reaching some number of consecutive passes, the singular focus of our combined concentration. Most of all I love spending the time, outside, with my son.

Will is 12 now, and on a travel baseball team; I have nothing to offer by way of meaningful “practice.” We have reversed roles: Now I’m the one asking him to get up off the couch and play.

Parenthood is so full of letting go — not just of children turning into young adults and leaving home, but of so many little selves along the path to adulthood. The smiley, round-cheeked toddler becomes the shy 7-year-old; the thoughtful, shaggy-haired kindergartner becomes the clean-cut, Celtics-mad fifth grader. Sometimes the urge to hold on feels almost frantic. The only way to pin time down is to remember: this moment, this boy, this place. Ritual and repetition.

When we first started playing, we would begin a few feet apart and with every completed catch take a step back, expanding the distance between us. Now when we play, I’m all the way up by the neighbor’s pine tree, and Will is down by the mailbox. He is almost a foot taller than he was at the start. Even if it’s been a while, the muscle memory soon kicks in: Catch, draw your arm back, crook your elbow, let go.

Jessica Shattuck is the author of the forthcoming novel “ Last House .”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here’s our email: [email protected] .

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , WhatsApp , X and Threads .

• Bihar Board

GSEB SSC Result 2024

Srm university.

• TN Board Result 2024
• GSEB Board Result 2024
• Karnataka Board Result 2024
• CG Board Result 2024
• Kerala Board Result 2024
• Shiv Khera Special
• Education News
• Web Stories
• Current Affairs
• नए भारत का नया उत्तर प्रदेश
• School & Boards
• College Admission
• Govt Jobs Alert & Prep
• GK & Aptitude
• School Life

Mother’s Day Essay In English (2024): Short and Long Essay Ideas For School Students

Ideas on mother’s day 2024: check this article to learn essay writing on the occasion of mother’s day. find here some of the best ideas in 10 lines, 150 words, 250 words, and long format for students of all grades..

10 Lines On Mother’s Day For School Students

• Mothers are the one who gives us life, care for us, and guide us through the path of life. 
• God cannot be everywhere so they sent mothers to take care of us and our family. Mothers are the precious gift of god.  
• We should appreciate our mothers for their affection by celebrating Mother's Day.
• Mother's Day is an opportunity to express gratitude to our mothers and to know about their importance and significance in our lives.
• Mother’s Day honours the core of motherhood. It is a day to show love and care to the mothers that they give us always.
• Mothers only need care, love, and respect, which serve as the true meaning of celebrating Mother’s Day.
• Mother’s Day serves as one of the best days to convey our heartiest respect and regards to mothers. On this day, people should thank the mother for everything she does.
• The place of a mother is irreplaceable in the life of a child, and her contributions are endless. This day serves as a perfect example to appreciate her for growing up as a better human being.
• Mother's Day is a beautiful celebration of motherhood to express our love and gratitude to the special women in our lives. A mother's love is pure and selfless which cannot be expressed in words. 
• My mother is my greatest teacher and supporter. She has always been there for me to guide me through life's challenges and teach me valuable lessons along the way.

Mother’s Day Essay In 150 Words

Mothers are the epitome of beauty with brains. We should shower our mothers with love and respect every day and let’s not forget the sacrifices they made for us to protect us in every possible way. 

On this day, we should help our mothers with the daily household chores and also make special arrangements for them. Give her a card by writing down your feelings for your mother. Make handmade cards for her and bring her the utmost happiness by getting a surprise. 

Mother’s Day Essay In 200 words

Mother’s Day is all about being grateful for the presence of this amazing human in our lives that god has given us. Always be grateful for your beautiful mother and express your heartfelt gratitude. 

Mothers are the most powerful creatures on this earth. Mother’s love is very precious. A bond between mother and child is one of the most beautiful bonds that one can cherish. Mothers make a lot of sacrifices for their family that is why we should always respect our mothers. 

To honour the importance of mothers in our lives, we celebrate this remarkable day as Mother’s Day. Mothers are extraordinary human beings who take a lot of pain to bring their children into this world. From raising the children to teaching them manners, a mother goes through it all. 

Additional Lines For Mother’s Day Essay Writing

• A mother's love knows no bounds, she provides us with a blanket of warmth and comfort during every storm. 
• Finding solace in a mother’s arms is all a child needs to make themselves the happiest. 
• A mother’s laughter is the melody of music that fills our home with joy and sunshine. 
• A child never forgets the life lessons that are being taught by a mother. A mother’s love and compassion know no limits. 
• Mother’s guidance helps the children shape their lives by providing all the love and comfort to them. 
• A Mother’s hug is a cocoon of love that turns beautiful moments into precious future memories. 
• T his Mother's Day, let's not just celebrate her, but let's honour her, cherish her, and express our gratitude for all she does and all she is.
• A mother’s love holds stories of resilience with her heart overflowing with dreams and ambitions.

Also, check 

Mother’s Day Speech in Hindi 2024: मदर्स डे पर छोटे और बड़े भाषण हिंदी में

Get here latest School , CBSE and Govt Jobs notification in English and Hindi for Sarkari Naukari and Sarkari Result . Download the Jagran Josh Sarkari Naukri App . Check  Board Result 2024  for Class 10 and Class 12 like  CBSE Board Result ,  UP Board Result ,  Bihar Board Result ,  MP Board Result ,  Rajasthan Board Result  and Other States Boards.

• gseb.org SSC Result 2024
• 10th Result 2024 Gujarat Board
• GSEB SSC 10th Result 2024
• GSEB 10th Result 2024
• GSEB SSC Toppers List 2024
• 10th Public Exam Result 2024 Tamil Nadu
• DHSE Kerala Plus Two Result 2024
• CGBSE 10th Result 2024
• CGBSE 12th Result 2024
• NDA Result 2024

Latest Education News

RBSE Result 2024: Rajasthan Board Class 10, 12 Result Date And Time At rajresults.nic.in

RBSE 12th Commerce Result 2024: Rajasthan Board Class 12 Commerce Result Date And Time At rajresults.nic.in

RBSE 12th Science Result 2024: Rajasthan Board Class 12 Science Result Date And Time At rajresults.nic.in

RBSE 12th Art Result 2024: Rajasthan Board Class 12 Art Result Date And Time At rajresults.nic.in

RBSE 12th Result 2024: Rajasthan Board Class 12 Result Date And Time At rajresults.nic.in

RBSE 10th Result 2024: Rajasthan Board Class 10 Result Date And Time At rajresults.nic.in

IPL 2024 Playoffs Teams: ये है प्लेऑफ़ की प्रबल दावेदार, KKR Qualify करने वाली पहली टीम बनी

Weekly Current Affairs Questions and Answers: 06 May to 12 May 2024

Weekly Current Affairs Quiz Hindi: 06 मई से 12 मई 2024

[Today] IPL 2024 Points Table: Team Rankings and Net Run Rate

Orange Cap in IPL 2024: Top Players List with Most Runs in TATA IPL

Today’s School News Assembly Headlines (13 May):  Election 2024, Rafael Mada, HBSE Results 2024, IPL and Other News in English

Find 3 differences between the pictures of a lion on a scooter in 11 seconds!

COMEDK UGET 2024 Exam Today In 3 Shifts, Check Required Documents Here

IPL Playoffs 2024: Teams Scenario, Qualifier, Eliminator Rules, Venues and Other Details

Mother’s Day 2024: Top 11 Fun Facts You Need to Know and Share

Top 10 Weekly Current Affairs in Hindi: 06 मई से 12 मई 2024

IPL Final 2024: Date, Stadium, Venue, Tickets Price and How to Book Ticket Online

IPL 2024 Live Streaming: मोबाइल या टीवी कहां और कैसे देखें आज के आईपीएल का LIVE टेलीकास्ट?

Opinion The Supreme Court’s Republican bias hangs over the Trump immunity case

The conservative justices must navigate a crisis moment of their own making.

It is naive and ahistorical to pretend that the U.S. Supreme Court floats above politics as a quasi-sacred institution. The court has always been political, particularly when it comes to preserving its own influence.

One of its earliest and most celebrated decisions, Marbury v. Madison in 1803, can fairly be seen as a power grab for the ages: Chief Justice John Marshall established that the court had the ability to strike down laws, declaring that this unelected body can override the wishes of the branches of government chosen by the people.

But precisely because the court has arrogated itself so much authority, it is always in danger of squandering the legitimacy of its claims, especially when it acts with exceptional arrogance or in a blatantly partisan way.

As members of its 6-3 conservative majority ponder how and when they will rule on Donald Trump’s absolute immunity claim, they should understand how much they have already done to paint themselves as instruments of the Republican Party and the political right. They have created a crisis moment.

You can see what such a crisis looks like by examining one of the court’s worst decisions, Dred Scott v. Sandford. It was politics all the way down: The court colluded with two Democratic presidents, James Buchanan and Franklin Pierce, in a blatant effort to stop a rising Republican Party and a popular movement seeking to end the spread of slavery.

By declaring in 1857 that people of African descent could never be citizens and that Congress could not restrict slavery in the territories, the court persuaded millions of northerners that the “slave power” — the rallying cry against the plantation South’s elite — dominated the government. The north struck back three years later by electing Abraham Lincoln president. We know what followed.

Despite the popularity of the recent movie “ Civil War ,” we are not on the verge of outright military conflict. But the conservative justices seem hellbent on taking a side in the searing partisan battle that is dividing the country into closely matched halves, at a cost to its own legitimacy and the nation’s confidence in the rule of law.

Consider its decisions undercutting the regulation of large political contributions , gutting the Voting Rights Act and slow-walking reapportionment cases aimed at protecting Black political representation. Together, these decisions empower the wealthiest and most privileged people in the country and undercut the electoral clout of long-marginalized citizens. There’s a clear direction here.

Add to this the invention of the “ major questions doctrine ,” through which the court has seized the power to strike down executive agency actions of “vast economic and political significance” unless Congress clearly authorized them. It’s a move that allows the court’s conservatives to throw out any regulations and executive actions by Democratic administrations that they don’t like.

When the court invalidated President Biden’s student loan debt relief program last year, Justice Elena Kagan rightly complained that in “every respect, the Court today exceeds its proper, limited role in our Nation’s governance,” based on the “made-up major questions doctrine.”

Responding to Kagan, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote that it “has become a disturbing feature of some recent opinions to criticize the decisions with which they disagree as going beyond the proper role of the judiciary.” No, what’s disturbing is the court itself going beyond the proper role of the judiciary.

Through such overreach, the court has created the cloud of suspicion that hangs over its deliberations on the former president’s absolute immunity claim.

Trump’s contention is both absurd and dangerous to a free republic. Yet in last week’s oral arguments, most of the conservative justices were more eager to worry about entirely hypothetical problems future presidents might confront than to deal with the facts before them involving a president who plainly tried to overturn a legitimate election.

If the court delays its ruling until late June or forces the trial court to litigate new issues it might raise, it knows it will be delaying Trump’s most important trial until after this year’s election. The court already fed skepticism about its motives in December when it denied special counsel Jack Smith’s request for the court to bypass the appeals process and fast-track a hearing on matters Smith knew the justices would want to address.

There is a way for the court to prove its willingness to suspend partisanship at least some of the time. Instead of wasting precious time to rule on issues not directly raised by this case, it could take up Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s suggestion that it confine itself to answering the question Trump raised: “whether all official acts [by a president] get immunity.” She proposed that it wait for a case that “actually presents” the issues that preoccupy the conservatives.

One of her fellow justices has made an excellent argument for this approach. “If it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it is necessary not to decide more,” Roberts wrote in a 2022 opinion . In the Trump case, he would do a lot for the court’s reputation by following his own advice and bringing another conservative with him.