participative leadership a literature review and prospects for future research

Participative Leadership: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research

Affiliations.

• 1 School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
• 2 College of Business Administration, Gachon University, Seongnam, South Korea.
• 3 School of Management, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xi'an, China.
• PMID: 35719563
• PMCID: PMC9204162
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924357

Changes in the external market environment put forward objective requirements for the formulation of organizational strategic plans, making it difficult for the organization's leaders to make the right and effective decisions quickly on their own. As a result, participative leadership, which encourages and supports employees to participate in the decision-making process of organizations, has received increasing attention in both theory and practice. We searched the literature related to participative leadership in databases such as Web of Science, EBSCO, ProQuest, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Based on this, we clarify the concept of participative leadership, propose a definition of participative leadership, summarize measurement scales for this type of leadership, and compare participative leadership with other leadership styles (empowering leadership and directive leadership). We also present a research framework for participative leadership that demonstrates its antecedents; the mechanisms for its development based on social exchange theory, conservation of resources theory, social cognitive theory; social information processing theory, and implicit leadership theory; and outcomes. Finally, we identify five potential research areas: Connotation, antecedents, outcomes, mediators and moderators, and study of participative leadership in China.

Keywords: decision; effectiveness; employee; leadership; organization; participation; participative leadership.

Copyright © 2022 Wang, Hou and Li.

Publication types

• Advanced Search
• All new items
• Journal articles
• Manuscripts
• All Categories
• Metaphysics and Epistemology
• Epistemology
• Metaphilosophy
• Metaphysics
• Philosophy of Action
• Philosophy of Language
• Philosophy of Mind
• Philosophy of Religion
• Value Theory
• Applied Ethics
• Meta-Ethics
• Normative Ethics
• Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
• Philosophy of Law
• Social and Political Philosophy
• Value Theory, Miscellaneous
• Science, Logic, and Mathematics
• Logic and Philosophy of Logic
• Philosophy of Biology
• Philosophy of Cognitive Science
• Philosophy of Computing and Information
• Philosophy of Mathematics
• Philosophy of Physical Science
• Philosophy of Social Science
• Philosophy of Probability
• General Philosophy of Science
• Philosophy of Science, Misc
• History of Western Philosophy
• Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
• Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
• 17th/18th Century Philosophy
• 19th Century Philosophy
• 20th Century Philosophy
• History of Western Philosophy, Misc
• Philosophical Traditions
• African/Africana Philosophy
• Asian Philosophy
• Continental Philosophy
• European Philosophy
• Philosophy of the Americas
• Philosophical Traditions, Miscellaneous
• Philosophy, Misc
• Philosophy, Introductions and Anthologies
• Philosophy, General Works
• Teaching Philosophy
• Philosophy, Miscellaneous
• Other Academic Areas
• Natural Sciences
• Social Sciences
• Cognitive Sciences
• Formal Sciences
• Arts and Humanities
• Professional Areas
• Other Academic Areas, Misc
• Submit a book or article
• Upload a bibliography
• Personal page tracking
• Archives we track
• Information for publishers
• Introduction
• Submitting to PhilPapers
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Subscriptions
• Editor's Guide
• The Categorization Project
• For Publishers
• For Archive Admins
• PhilPapers Surveys
• Bargain Finder
• About PhilPapers
• Create an account

Participative Leadership: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research

Author's profile.

Reprint years

Philarchive, external links.

• From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)

Through your library

• Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
• Configure custom resolver

Similar books and articles

Citations of this work.

No citations found.

References found in this work

Participative Leadership: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research

Qiang Wang , Hong Hou , Zhibin Li

Jun 3, 2022

Influential Citations

Quality indicators

Frontiers in Psychology

Key Takeaway : Participative leadership encourages employees to participate in decision-making, enhancing organizational effectiveness and enhancing the research framework for its development.

Changes in the external market environment put forward objective requirements for the formulation of organizational strategic plans, making it difficult for the organization’s leaders to make the right and effective decisions quickly on their own. As a result, participative leadership, which encourages and supports employees to participate in the decision-making process of organizations, has received increasing attention in both theory and practice. We searched the literature related to participative leadership in databases such as Web of Science, EBSCO, ProQuest, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Based on this, we clarify the concept of participative leadership, propose a definition of participative leadership, summarize measurement scales for this type of leadership, and compare participative leadership with other leadership styles (empowering leadership and directive leadership). We also present a research framework for participative leadership that demonstrates its antecedents; the mechanisms for its development based on social exchange theory, conservation of resources theory, social cognitive theory; social information processing theory, and implicit leadership theory; and outcomes. Finally, we identify five potential research areas: Connotation, antecedents, outcomes, mediators and moderators, and study of participative leadership in China.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Front Psychol

Does Participative Leadership Matters in Employees’ Outcomes During COVID-19? Role of Leader Behavioral Integrity

Muhammad usman.

1 Department of Business Administration, Iqra National University, Peshawar, Pakistan

2 School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

Usman Ghani

3 Department of Business Administration, Iqra University, Karachi, Pakistan

4 School of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

5 Department of Applied Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Tahir Farid

6 Department of Psychology, Foundation University Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Sadaf Iqbal

Associated data.

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has badly affected the social, physical, and emotional health of workers, especially those working in the healthcare sectors. Drawing on social exchange theory, we investigated the effects of participative leadership on employees’ workplace thriving and helping behaviors among frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we examined the moderating role of a leader’s behavioral integrity in strengthening the relationship between participative leadership, and employees’ workplace thriving and helping behaviors. By using a two-wave time-lagged design and data collected from 244 healthcare workers, a moderated hierarchal regression was implemented to test the proposed hypotheses. As hypothesized, participative leadership predicted employees’ workplace thriving and helping behaviors. The leader’s behavioral integrity strengthened the relationship between participative leadership and employees’ thriving and moderated the relationship between participative leadership helping behaviors. Implications for research, theory, and practice are discussed.

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic appears to have been the most significant phenomenon of 2020 and has badly affected the health system worldwide ( Ornell et al., 2020 ). According to the United Nations (2020) , this ongoing respiratory disease is the greatest challenge we have faced after the Second World War. As of January 9, 2021, there are over 88.9 million confirmed cases, including 1.9 million deaths. The USA reported over 22 million cases, India 10.4 million, Brazil 8.01 million, Russia 3.32 million, the United Kingdom 2.96 million, France 2.74 million, Turkey 2.30 million, Italy 2.23 million, Spain 2.05 million, and Pakistan about half a million. Until that date, the USA, Brazil, and India had the highest death toll, with 369,390, 201,460, and 150,570, respectively ( World Health Organization, 2020 ).

No single organization has been able to escape from the consequences of the new disease, COVID-19, which has drastically influenced all walks of life, including our social functioning, economy, health, and services ( Antonakis, 2020 ; McKibbin and Fernando, 2020 ). We have witnessed a substantial workforce reigned by fear, confusion, despair, and uncertainties ( Charoensukmongkol and Phungsoonthorn, 2020 ). Beyond the significant insights from epidemiology, medicine, economics, and psychology, different leadership approaches are also vital to answering the challenges thrown up by this critical disease ( Kniffin et al., 2020 ).

The effect of leadership style is thought to be decisive in a crisis, and its response to such situations could quickly shift organizations’ social, economic, and health status, which ultimately uplifts employees’ well-being ( Dirani et al., 2020 ). Therefore, in this study, an exchange-based model is developed and empirically tested to investigate participative leaders’ impact on healthcare workers’ outcomes, in particular employees’ workplace thriving and helping behaviors while also exploring the moderating effect of a leader’s behavioral integrity. Specifically, we hypothesize that participative leaders can help employees in a crisis-induced work environment to nurture them to thriving and increase their helping behaviors. Importantly, this research aims to contribute to a participative leadership role in the COVID-19 context by exploring two critical issues.

First, as literature on leadership in healthcare settings during crises is scarce ( Bartsch et al., 2020 ), to fill this gap, we examine the role of participative leadership’s effectiveness in predicting employees’ workplace thriving and helping behaviors during the COVID-19 crisis. Participative leadership focuses on shared influence and joint decision-making between leaders and subordinates ( Koopman and Wierdsma, 1998 ), to provide employees with greater discretion, attention, and support and solicit their involvement in addressing problems and making decisions ( Nystrom, 1990 ). In the light of social exchange theory ( Blau, 1964 ; Huang et al., 2010 ) when leaders treat employees well, they are expected to reciprocate by exhibiting higher work performance and putting extra effort to contribute to the organization ( Moorman, 1991 ). Based on this notion, we posit that healthcare workers are more likely to thrive and extend more helping behaviors toward others in the presence of participative leadership.

Second, to better understand when participative leadership is more effective in nurturing employees’ workplace thriving and their helping behaviors, the current study’s important motivation is to examine its boundary conditions. Considering the limited studies on digital transformation and leadership ( Uhl-Bien and Arena, 2018 ), we examine the moderating role of a leader’s behavioral integrity (LBI) on the relationship between participative leadership and employees’ workplace thriving and helping behaviors.

We choose LBI as a potential boundary condition for three reasons. First, past studies reveal its positive effect on employees’ job outcomes: organizational commitment ( Fritz et al., 2013 ), employees’ performance ( Leroy et al., 2012 ), creativity, and extra-role efforts ( Way et al., 2018 ; Peng and Wei, 2019 ). Second, earlier studies also show that LBI has many implications for the effectiveness of leaders’ behaviors in shaping desirable job outcomes for employees ( Kannan-Narasimhan and Lawrence, 2012 ; Peng and Wei, 2019 ). Accordingly, we argue that LBI also has implications for participative leadership’s effectiveness in shaping employees’ workplace thriving and helping behaviors. Finally, prior studies recognized LBI’s relevance in highly demanding business environments ( Yang et al., 2019 ) which can arise due to the crisis of COVID-19. As the COVID-19 pandemic is often referred to as a significant digital transformation driver ( Iansiti and Richards, 2020 ), based on the LBI as a boundary condition, we expect participative leadership to affect healthcare staff’s job outcomes more profoundly.

The structure of the current paper is as follows. The theoretical background and hypotheses development are presented in Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development section. The methodology including sampling and procedures, measurement, and data analysis are developed in Methodology section. The results are given in Results section. The discussion and implications are provided in Discussion section. Limitations and future directions are offered in Limitations and Future Work Guidelines section. Finally, Conclusion section comprises the conclusion.

Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development

Social exchange theory.

Social exchange theory (SET: Blau, 1964 ) is considered one of the most prominent theories in organizational behavior and we have used this for our framework. SET explains that a good deed by an exchange partner (i.e., a leader) engenders the other (i.e., a subordinate) to feel obligated to reciprocate with positive behaviors ( Gouldner, 1960 ). Individuals who observe their leader as a worthy role model are likely to feel obligated to their leadership and exhibit more interest in their assigned work ( Liborius, 2014 ).

The social exchange view has been developed and adjusted in a range of leadership literature (e.g., Eisenberger et al., 2010 ; Li and Liao, 2014 ). Since social exchange contains unspecified expectations and obligations of future returns, subordinates react positively to leaders’ favorable conduct based on the norm of reciprocity ( Gouldner, 1960 ; Blau, 1964 ). According to the SET, when leaders provide employees with decision-making, autonomy, and support, subordinates are more likely to reciprocate with positive attitudes and behaviors to their supervisors ( Gouldner, 1960 ). For example, when leaders have built high-quality associations with their employees, these employees tend to exhibit more thriving at work, OCB, and other favorable outcomes ( Organ, 1990 ; Chan, 2019 ; Usman et al., 2021 ). In a similar vein, recent research also reveals that individuals experience higher energy levels when they sense positive exchanges with their supervisors ( Atwater and Carmeli, 2009 ). Relying on the social exchange perspective, we argue that employees who are encouraged by their leaders through participative leadership behaviors, such as involvement in decision-making and being given more responsibility, and so this autonomy may lead individuals to thrive more and offer helping behaviors toward co-workers.

Participative Leadership and Employees’ Workplace Thriving

Workplace thriving ( Spreitzer et al., 2005 ) refers to a mental state of both “vitality” and “learning” that an individual experiences during his/her work. Prior studies acknowledge vitality and learning as two essential dimensions of workplace thriving. Vitality represents one’s energized feeling and presents as an eagerness for work ( Nix et al., 1999 ). In comparison, learning refers to one’s attainment of knowledge and the application of skills to shape confidence and capability in the work setting ( Carver, 1998 ). Workplace thriving indicates a psychological experience and is subject largely to the peripheral environment’s influence.

Drawing on the self-determination theory, Spreitzer et al. (2005) suggested a socially embedded workplace thriving model. According to Spreitzer et al. (2005) a sound working environment, rich work-related resources, and robust motivational conduct are effective reasons for employees’ workplace thriving. In particular, positive situational features, such as employees’ work environment and how they accomplish their job tasks (including information sharing, decision-making, and the degree of mutual trust during interpersonal communication), are essential for individuals to thrive.

Prior studies show that various positive leadership styles, such as servant leadership ( Usman et al., 2021 ), empowering leadership ( Li et al., 2016 ), ambidextrous leadership ( Usman et al., 2020 ), authentic leadership ( Mortier et al., 2016 ), and transformational leadership ( Niessen et al., 2017 ), are important in fostering positive individual employee outcomes such as workplace thriving. However, although participative leadership leads to several positive outcomes ( Bortoluzzi et al., 2014 ; Chan, 2019 ; Chang et al., 2019 ), its impact on workplace thriving is still relatively unexplored in research studies.

In essence, participative leadership affects individuals’ work contexts, provides them with essential working resources, and enhances their motivation levels ( Spreitzer, 1995 ). First, participative leadership encourages employees to be involved in decision-making ( Kahai et al., 1997 ; Somech, 2006 ) and offers responsibility, power, and autonomy to subordinates ( Kirkman and Rosen, 1999 ). Subsequently, it enables them to have comparatively high decision-making power and self-direction and undertake accurate and timely decisions and actions. Second, this empowering context improves individuals’ active involvement in the work setting and may enhance employees’ working vitality and learning motivations.

Besides, the social learning view on participative leadership posits a learning process by offering individuals more intrinsic motivation and rewards from the work context ( Thomas and Velthouse, 1990 ). This includes encouraging subordinates into the decision-making practice and taking more time to establish progressive interpersonal relations with their subordinates ( Kozlowski et al., 1999 ). Recent research reveals that individuals experience higher energy levels when they sense positive exchanges with their supervisors ( Atwater and Carmeli, 2009 ). We argue that this will, in turn, nurture employees’ workplace thriving because, when individuals know the meaning of their work, they increase attention to their tasks and involvement in their work ( Orvis et al., 2009 ). Therefore, we hypothesize:

Hypothesis 1 : Participative leadership is significantly positively associated with employees’ workplace thriving.

Participative Leadership and Helping Behavior

Participative leadership is described as the actions that empower the employees and offer them prospects to be involved in independent decision-making processes. Active involvement in decision-making encourages employees to trust in their leader’s abilities and skills. When individuals gain experience and skills, they get appreciation, and their leader recognizes their novel ideas and skills. This belief in them by their supervisors urges them to carry out additional tasks and responsibilities that enhance the organization’s competitiveness and growth ( Lu et al., 2015 ). A participative leader stimulates motivation via involving employees in the decision-making process ( Kahai et al., 1997 ; Somech, 2003 ); this involvement makes them feel that leaders value their ideas and suggestions. Consequently, the autonomy of sharing ideas and low control of a participative leader intrinsically motivate followers to exhibit more helping behaviors ( Sagnak, 2016 ).

Organ (1990) reveals that the exchange-based ( Blau, 1964 ; Huang et al., 2010 ) model is particularly relevant in understanding employees’ discretionary behaviors (e.g., helping) in the workplace. If individuals view their exchange as fair, in turn, they will feel an obligation to respond to leaders by exhibiting citizenship behavior ( Farh et al., 1990 ; Organ, 1990 ). Helping co-workers is a kind of employee citizenship behavior acknowledged to benefit leaders and organizations ( Settoon et al., 1996 ; Masterson et al., 2000 ). For instance, assisting co-workers with a task at hand, on which his/her leader is dependent, assists in furthering the leader’s goals related to his/her job ( Poon, 2006 ). Likewise, if skillful subordinates offer support in orienting new co-workers, it might facilitate the leadership to “conserve energy” and spend more time on essential aspects of his/her job ( Podsakoff and MacKenzie, 1997 ). In this regard, employees’ helping behaviors toward co-workers are considered a type of reciprocity for valuable resources exchanged in a socio-emotional association with the leadership ( Korsgaard et al., 2002 ; Yang and Mossholder, 2010 ). For these reasons, we hypothesize the following:

Hypothesis 2 : Participative leadership is positively related to employees’ helping behaviors.

Moderating Role of LBI

Simons (2002 , p. 19) defines LBI as “the perceived consistency between a leader’s words and deeds.” Prior studies (e.g., Palanski et al., 2011 ; Leroy et al., 2012 ; Yang et al., 2019 ), have empirically and theoretically tested and validated that LBI is a relatively different construct from other leadership traits such as servant leadership, authentic leadership, and ethical leadership. Perceived LBI entails both the perceived promise-keeping and alignment between espoused and enacted values, irrespective of moral principles ( Simons, 2002 ). Even though perceived LBI could include adherence to immoral or anti-social values ( Peng and Wei, 2019 ), in practice, “impression management concerns describe that vast majority of managerially supported values are socially desirable or positive” ( Way et al., 2018 , p. 766).

Past studies reveal that LBI significantly and positively predicts several work-related outcomes for employees. For example, LBI leads to employees’ organizational commitment ( Leroy et al., 2012 ; Simons et al., 2015 ), creativity ( Peng and Wei, 2019 ), and in-role and extra-role performances (e.g., Leroy et al., 2012 ; Way et al., 2018 ). On this basis, we posit that combining participative leadership with LBI is likely to yield the most beneficial effects on employees’ work-related behaviors during the COVID-19 crisis, as LBI theory suggests that LBI is particularly important in extremely demanding situations ( Leroy et al., 2012 ). On one hand, it will stimulate employees’ intrinsic motivation to put more effort into their work ( Fry et al., 2005 ), thereby fostering employees’ thriving. On the other hand, by establishing the norms of desirable workplace behaviors via a consistent pattern of words-deed alignment ( Simons, 2002 ), trust in leaders will develop ( Simons et al., 2015 ). In turn, employees will feel an obligation to reciprocate by exhibiting citizenship behaviors such as helping behaviors ( Farh et al., 1990 ).

In terms of the opposite situation, we contend that individuals who observe their leaders’ integrity as low are less likely to be motivated to involve themselves in participative leadership. This is because, when employees perceive their leaders as low in integrity, they might feel uncertain about what constitutes desirable and appropriate behavioral norms in their workplace ( Simons, 2002 ; Simons et al., 2007 ), leading to less motivation to show agreement with these leaders’ values ( Hewlin et al., 2017 ). Consequently, employees might less receptive and attentive to their tasks, rendering a low degree of psychological resourcefulness that ultimately suppresses their capacity and enthusiasm to do their work ( Yang et al., 2019 ). As a result, we argue that employees may be less likely to embrace participative leadership and this then weakens the relationship between participative leadership and workplace thriving.

Moreover, leaders with BI would have a greater inclination to be self-centered and care more about their own benefits than those of their subordinates’ ( Jiang et al., 2014 ). Hence, these leaders are likely to conflict with the value of altruism characteristic of participative leadership. Thus, when individuals consider his/her leaders as lacking in integrity, as a result, they will be less likely to identify with their leaders, which unbalances the association between participative leadership and employee helping behaviors. Likewise, knowing that trustworthiness is a distinctive feature of leaders observed as higher in integrity ( Hewlin et al., 2017 ), individuals with a lower perception of their leaders’ integrity will form low levels of trust with those leaders ( Hinkin and Schriesheim, 2015 ). Subsequently, they may embrace participative leadership less and this weakens the relationship between participative leadership and employee helping behaviors ( Figure 1 ).

Proposed model.

Hypothesis 3a : Perceived LBI moderates the association between participative leadership and workplace thriving, such that the positive association is stronger for individuals who perceive their leaders as having high LBI rather than low.

Hypothesis 3b : Perceived LBI moderates the association between participative leadership and helping behaviors, such that the positive association is stronger for individuals who perceive their leaders as having high LBI rather than low.

Methodology

Sampling and procedures.

The current study used a time-lagged design to collect data from the healthcare sector of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) Province in Pakistan. Participation was voluntary. The administered questionnaires were distributed and collected within a designated time. Accessibility sampling was used in data collection. All the participants were educated about the purpose of the study, methods, and researcher affiliations. We told the participants that they have the right to refuse or break their commitment to participate any time without any reprisal. We also ensured the confidentiality of the participants’ responses by collecting data anonymously and reporting the aggregated results. The data were collected through two surveys managed 2 months apart. This approach was used to minimize the common method issue, as recommended by Podsakoff et al. (2012) . Prior studies, for example, Farid et al. (2019) and Usman et al. (2021) , also used this approach. Participative leadership and LBI were measured at Time 1, and employees’ workplace thriving and helping behavior were measured at Time 2.

We collected 244 questionnaires, eight of which were not properly completed and hence removed, leaving a usable sample of 236. This sample included 26.3% males and 73.7% females, 24.2% participants were below 25 years of age, 58.9% were aged 25–33, and 16.9% were above 33, 22.5% had the experience of 1–4 years, 48.7% participants had 4–8, while 28.8% had over 8.

Participative Leadership

Participative leadership was measured with a six-item scale adapted from a study by Arnold et al. (2000) , an example item being “The supervisor encourages us to express our opinions and suggestions.” The Cronbach’s alpha of their study was 0.91. See Table 1 in Validity and Reliability section for the current study’s Cronbach’s alpha values.

Measurement analysis summary.

Perceived Leadership Behavioral Integrity

Perceived leadership behavioral integrity was assessed with a six-item scale adapted from a study by Moorman et al. (2013) . An example item is “Leaders in my organization will do what they say.” Their study’s Cronbach’s alpha was 0.91.

Workplace Thriving

Workplace thriving was evaluated with a 10-item scale by Porath et al. (2012) . Example items include “I see myself continually improving” and “I have energy and spirit” Their Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.92.

Helping Behavior

Helping behavior was measured with a seven-item adapted scale ( Van Dyne and LePine, 1998 ) with an example item being “I am used to helping others in their work responsibilities.” The Cronbach’s alpha value they reported for this scale was 0.85.

Control Variables

We controlled the demographic variables such as age, gender, and education because previous studies have shown these to have some influence on the study variables ( Kanfer and Ackerman, 2004 ; Uchino et al., 2006 ; Purvanova and Muros, 2010 ).

Data Analysis

A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to check the measurement model fitness indices such as χ 2 , SRMR, RMSEA, and CFI ( Hu and Bentler, 1999 ). Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability and average variance extracted were calculated to check the constructs’ reliability and validity. To check the common method bias issue, Harman’s single-factor test was performed. Finally, hierarchical linear regression analysis was applied to test the study’s proposed model. We used this technique as it provides step-by-step outcomes of study variables ( Ghani et al., 2020b ; Nadeem et al., 2020 ), and has recently been widely employed by researchers ( Tariq and Ding, 2018 ; Ali et al., 2019 ; Ghani et al., 2020a ) as a means to confirm their proposed models.

Common Method Bias

We collected data from a single source in the current study; therefore, CMB may be an issue in the data ( Podsakoff et al., 2012 ). Harman’s single-factor test indicated that the most total variance was explained by the first factor (32.68%). As this is less than 50%, CMB is not an issue in the data. Moreover, the inter-correlation of the study variables was less than 0.90, indicating the non-existence of CMB.

Validity and Reliability

To assess the validity and reliability of the construct, we followed methods used by Fornell and Larcker (1981) , Bagozzi and Yi (1988) and Hinkin (1998) . Table 1 shows factor loadings above 0.60, Cronbach’s alpha values greater than 0.70, composite reliability values greater than 0.60, and average variance extracted values greater than 0.50, confirming convergent validity. Further, Table 2 exhibits the square root value of AVE higher than the inter-correlation coefficients of the constructs, showing good discriminant validity ( Ali et al., 2020 ; Rasool et al., 2020 , 2021 ).

Means, SD, and correlations results.

n = 236, PL, participative leadership; PLBI, perceived leader behavioral integrity; WT, workplace thriving; HB, helping behaviors. The bold values are the square roots of AVE.

Measurement Model

After assessing the convergent and discriminant validities, measurement model fitness indices were also evaluated. The measurement model’s fitness achieved the threshold criteria proposed by Hu and Bentler (1999) and Hair et al. (2007) , χ 2 = 2.125, SRMR = 0.053, RMSEA = 0.078, and CFI = 0.905, thus all are within range.

Table 2 shows the correlation results among the study variables. The results indicate that all the relationships are in their expected directions.

Hierarchical Linear Regression Analysis

The hierarchical linear regression was conducted via SPSS (see Table 3 ). Results showed that participative leadership positively and significantly influenced workplace thriving ( β = 0.418, p < 0.01, Model 2), supporting H1. Similarly, participative leadership positively and significantly influence helping behaviors ( β = 0.579, p < 0.01, Model 6), and hence, H2 is also supported. Furthermore, the significant interaction coefficients ( β = 0.194, p < 0.01, Model 4) and ( β = 0.234, p < 0.01, Model 6) confirm the moderation effect of perceived leader behavioral integrity in the relationships between participative leadership with workplace thriving and with helping behaviors, supporting H3a and H3b.

Hierarchical regression results.

PL, participative leadership; PLBI, perceived leadership behavioral integrity.

The moderating effect of perceived leader behavioral integrity is visualized shown in Figures 2 , ​ ,3. 3 . Further, perceived leader behavioral integrity was split into high (+1 SD) and low (−1 SD) levels to examine the nature of interaction effects. The positive association between participative leadership and workplace thriving is much stronger and more positive ( β = 0.578, t = 8.174, p < 0.01) when perceived leader behavioral integrity is high. Unsurprisingly, this relationship is less positive ( β = 0.190, t = 6.008, p < 0.01) when such integrity is perceived as low. Similarly, the positive association between participative leadership and helping behavior is much stronger and more positive ( β = 0.773, t = 10.932, p < 0.01) when perceived leader behavioral integrity is high and less so ( β = 0.305, t = 9.645, p < 0.01) when it is low. These findings provide further support for the moderation hypothesis.

Moderating effect of perceived leadership behavioral integrity between the relationship of participative leadership and workplace thriving.

Moderating effect of perceived leadership behavioral integrity between participative leadership and helping behaviors.

Overall, the current study advances our understanding of participative leadership’s influence by empirically testing its relationship with thriving and helping behaviors and testing how a leader’s integrity moderates this linkage in a novel COVID-19 context. Specifically, using the exchange-based model, we found that participative leadership was positively related to employees’ thriving and helping behaviors during the crisis. Furthermore, findings reveal that the relationship between participative leadership and employees’ work-related outcomes was contingent on the leader’s perceived integrity. Several theoretical and practical implications of the study are discussed below.

Theoretical Implications

The current study makes three distinct theoretical contributions. First, this study advances the participative leadership literature in the novel COVID-19 context by showing that the participative leadership style nurtures employees’ workplace thriving and helping behaviors. Consistent with prior studies, results show a positive relationship between participative leadership and employees’ workplace thriving. We argued that an important characteristic of participative leadership is embedded in the leader-subordinate relationship, which genuinely gives followers greater discretion, attention, support, and empowerment in decisions ( Nystrom, 1990 ), ultimately enhancing their vitality and learning motivation at work. Second, developing the social exchange perspective, participative leaders’ behaviors stimulate the development of a smooth relationship with followers, which encourages employees’ positive response as helping behaviors. These findings of a positive relationship between participative leadership and work-related outcomes extend the previous empirical findings ( Bortoluzzi et al., 2014 ; Chan, 2019 ; Chang et al., 2019 ) from the leadership level to the subordinate level.

Finally, the current study contributes to the effectiveness of participative leadership by empirically testing leader behavioral integrity as an imperative contingent factor for describing the relationship between participative leadership and employees’ work-related outcomes, i.e., workplace thriving and helping behaviors. The findings on the role of perceived LBI ( Gatling et al., 2020 ) are significant and reveal an important theoretical contribution.

Surprisingly, the boundary condition of perceived LBI is not well understood theoretically nor tested empirically. Until now, this has limited our comprehension of the application and usefulness of participative leadership in the work context, particularly in a crisis such as COVID-19. Therefore, this study addresses this research void by developing theoretical reasoning and finding empirical support for our prediction that the association between participative leadership and employees’ thriving and helping behaviors was stronger when LBI was higher and vice versa. This finding shows that LBI has a significant catalyzing influence that amplifies the work outcomes related to participative leadership.

Practical Implications

The study provides a few important practice implications for healthcare organizations. The findings show that participative leadership is relevant to the healthcare employee context. Participative leaders delegate greater empowerment to their followers and encourage them to actively participate in decision-making, which positively influences their workplace thriving and arouses more helping behaviors. Hence, it is suggested that leaders could reduce an individual’s reluctance and reservations about participating by displaying adequate participative leadership, especially in a crisis (i.e., COVID-19). For example, leaders could extend opportunities and more support for participation, accept their employees’ recommendations, consider a varied range of decision choices, and offer adequate information and resources for subordinates to effectively accomplish the tasks they are participating in.

Building on these findings, we encourage healthcare leaders to learn and use participative leadership behaviors. Furthermore, healthcare organizations are well-advised to take significant steps to facilitate the development of participative leadership behaviors to nurture employees’ thriving and helping behaviors. For example, organizations could initiate advanced leadership development programs (i.e., coaching, mentoring, and structured workshops) where participative leadership behaviors can be learned and stimulated. Moreover, organizations should also pay attention to the leader’s behavioral integrity because this has substantial benefits for supportive leadership, well-being (i.e., thriving), and helping behaviors. A leader’s behavioral integrity can be improved via systematic performance management, training, and personal development practices.

Limitations and Future Work Guidelines

As with all research, the study has certain limitations that may have implications for forthcoming research. First, to test the hypotheses, the current study implemented a time-lagged design with data collected in two surveys administered 2 months apart. Future researchers need to vary the time between two surveys as a means of assessing the extent to which employees’ perceptions of leadership are prolonged. Second, we used the leader’s behavioral integrity as a boundary condition. Scholars may test our theoretical model by exploring additional moderators originating from subordinates’ attributes and dispositional factors that may affect individuals’ reactions to participative leadership. Further, we did not check for any mediating variable. Researchers could search for any possible underlying mechanisms between participative leadership and outcomes, i.e., employees’ thriving at work and helping behaviors. Third, we only collected data from the healthcare system in Pakistan, making it difficult to generalize the results to other organizations and other nations. To enhance its generalizability, research should extend the current findings to other industries.

Fourth, as Pakistan possesses a relationship-oriented culture, it is more likely that our specific cultural context (i.e., a collectivistic culture or high power distance), in which strong cooperation is valued, may have influenced the current study results. Also, there is a significant difference between Pakistani culture and western culture, which may influence employees’ attitudes and behavioral responses ( Chen et al., 2020 ). Future scholars should attempt to replicate our study findings by employing samples from western cultures. Finally, it is expected that global pandemics could happen more frequently in the future ( Settele et al., 2020 ). Therefore, it is important to conduct studies on a large scale to uncover many of the variables that boost employees’ workplace thriving and helping behaviors in response to future epidemics.

Our study highlights the role of the participative leadership style in linking it with two important employee job outcomes: workplace thriving and helping behaviors. Our results reveal that participative leadership may nurture employees to thrive and boost their helping behaviors, in line with the exchange-based perspective. In addition, the findings underlined the importance of LBI as a potential boundary condition for participative leadership’s effectiveness. We suggest the theoretical understandings gained through this research study will motivate future scholars to explore further how and when participative leader behaviors could enhance employees’ work-related outcomes.

Data Availability Statement

Ethics statement.

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements. Written informed consent was not obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

MU and UG: conceptualization and writing – original draft. UG: formal analysis. TF and SI: methodology. JC: project administration and supervision, writing – review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, multi-perspective formation mechanism of internal servicequality under the context of service enterprise transformation (Project No: 71872156) and the Central University Special Project Research on the Mechanism of Employee Irrational External Whistleblowing based on Affective Events Theory (Project No: 20720181092).

• Ali A., Bahadur W., Wang N., Luqman A., Khan A. N. (2020). Improving team innovation performance: role of social media and team knowledge management capabilities . Technol. Soc. 61 :101259. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101259 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ali A., Wang H., Khan A. N., Pitafi A. H., Amin M. W. (2019). Exploring the knowledge-focused role of interdependent members on team creative performance . Asian Bus. Manag. 18 , 98–121. 10.1057/s41291-018-00050-2 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Antonakis J. (2020). Leadership to defeat COVID-19 . Group Process. Intergr. Relat. 24 , 210–215. 10.1177/1368430220981418 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Arnold J. A., Arad S., Rhoades J. A., Drasgow F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors . J. Organ. Behav. 21 , 249–269. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2-# [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Atwater L., Carmeli A. (2009). Leader-member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work . Leadersh. Q. 20 , 264–275. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.009 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models . J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 16 , 74–94. 10.1007/BF02723327 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bartsch S., Weber E., Büttgen M., Huber A. (2020). Leadership matters in crisis-induced digital transformation: how to lead service employees effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic . J. Serv. Manag. 32 , 71–85. 10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0160 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Blau P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange . Sociol. Inq. 34 , 193–206. 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bortoluzzi G., Caporale L., Palese A. (2014). Does participative leadership reduce the onset of mobbing risk among nurse working teams? J. Nurs. Manag. 22 , 643–652. 10.1111/jonm.12042, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Carver C. S. (1998). Resilience and thriving: issues, models, and linkages . J. Soc. Issues 54 , 245–266. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01217.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chan S. C. H. (2019). Participative leadership and job satisfaction: the mediating role of work engagement and the moderating role of fun experienced at work . Leadersh. Org. Dev. J. 40 , 319–333. 10.1108/LODJ-06-2018-0215 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chang Y.-Y., Hodgkinson I., Hughes P., Chang C.-Y. (2019). The mediation between participative leadership and employee exploratory innovation: examining intermediate knowledge mechanisms . Leadersh. Org. Dev. J. 40 , 334–355. 10.1108/lodj-07-2018-0245 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Charoensukmongkol P., Phungsoonthorn T. (2020). The effectiveness of supervisor support in lessening perceived uncertainties and emotional exhaustion of university employees during the COVID-19 crisis: the constraining role of organizational intransigence . J. Gen. Psychol. 1–20. 10.1080/00221309.2020.1800582, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen L., Wadei K. A., Bai S., Liu J. (2020). Participative leadership and employee creativity: a sequential mediation model of psychological safety and creative process engagement . Leadersh. Org. Dev. J. 41 , 741–759. 10.1108/LODJ-07-2019-0319 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dirani K. M., Abadi M., Alizadeh A., Barhate B., Garza R. C., Gunasekara N., et al.. (2020). Leadership competencies and the essential role of human resource development in times of crisis: a response to Covid-19 pandemic . Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 23 , 380–394. 10.1080/13678868.2020.1780078 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Eisenberger R., Karagonlar G., Stinglhamber F., Neves P., Becker T. E., Gonzalez-Morales M. G., et al.. (2010). Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: the contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment . J. Appl. Psychol. 95 , 1085–1103. 10.1037/a0020858 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Farh J. L., Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction . J. Manag. 16 , 705–721. 10.1177/014920639001600404 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Farid T., Iqbal S., Jawahar I. M., Ma J., Khan M. K. (2019). The interactive effects of justice perceptions and Islamic work ethic in predicting citizenship behaviors and work engagement . Asian Bus. Manag. 18 , 31–50. 10.1057/s41291-018-00049-9 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fornell C., Larcker D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics . J. Mark. Res. 18 , 382–388. 10.1177/002224378101800313 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fritz J. H., O’Neil N. B., Popp A. M., Williams C., Arnett R. C. (2013). The influence of supervisory behavioral integrity on intent to comply with organizational ethical standards and organizational commitment . J. Bus. Ethics 114 , 251–263. 10.1007/s10551-012-1345-z [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fry L. W., Vitucci S., Cedillo M. (2005). Spiritual leadership and army transformation: theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline . Leadersh. Q. 16 , 835–862. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.07.012 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gatling A., Molintas D. H. R., Self T. T., Shum C. (2020). Leadership and behavioral integrity in the restaurant industry: the moderating roles of gender . J. Hum. Resour. Hosp. Tour. 19 , 62–81. 10.1080/15332845.2020.1672249 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ghani U., Teo T., Li Y., Usman M., Islam Z. U., Gul H., et al.. (2020a). Tit for tat: abusive supervision and knowledge hiding-the role of psychological contract breach and psychological ownership . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 :1240. 10.3390/ijerph17041240, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ghani U., Zhai X., Spector J. M., Chen N. S., Lin L., Ding D., et al.. (2020b). Knowledge hiding in higher education: role of interactional justice and professional commitment . High. Educ. 79 , 325–344. 10.1007/s10734-019-00412-5 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gouldner A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement . Am. Sociol. Rev. 25 , 161–178. 10.2307/2092623 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hair J., Black W., Babin B., Anderson R., Tatham R. (2007). Multivariate Data Analysis . New Delhi: Pearson Education. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hewlin P. F., Dumas T. L., Burnett M. F. (2017). To thine own, self be true? Facades of conformity, values incongruence, and the moderating impact of leader integrity . Acad. Manag. J. 60 , 178–199. 10.5465/amj.2013.0404 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hinkin T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires . Organ. Res. Methods 1 , 104–121. 10.1177/109442819800100106 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hinkin T. R., Schriesheim C. A. (2015). Leader reinforcement, behavioral integrity, and subordinate outcomes: a social exchange approach . Leadersh. Q. 26 , 991–1004. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.006 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hu L. T., Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives . Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 6 , 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Huang X., Iun J., Liu A., Gong Y. (2010). Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates . J. Organ. Behav. 31 , 122–143. 10.1002/job.636 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Iansiti M., Richards G. (2020). “Coronavirus is Widening the Corporate Digital Divide” Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2020/03/coronavirus-is-widening-the-corporate-digital-divide
• Jiang J. Y., Law K. S., Sun J. J. (2014). Leader—member relationship and burnout: the moderating role of leader integrity. Leader-member relationship and burnout of subordinates: the mediating role of leadership integrity . Manag. Organ. Rev. 10 , 223–247. 10.1017/s1740877600004162 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kahai S. S., Sosik J. J., Avolio B. J. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment . Pers. Psychol. 50 , 121–146. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00903.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kanfer R., Ackerman P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation . Acad. Manag. Rev. 29 , 440–458. 10.5465/amr.2004.13670969 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kannan-Narasimhan R., Lawrence B. S. (2012). Behavioral integrity: how leader referents and trust matter to workplace outcomes . J. Bus. Ethics 111 , 165–178. 10.1007/s10551-011-1199-9 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kirkman B. L., Rosen B. (1999). Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment . Acad. Manag. J. 42 , 58–74. 10.5465/256874 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kniffin K. M., Narayanan J., Anseel F., Antonakis J., Ashford S. P., Bakker A. B., et al.. (2020). COVID-19 and the workplace: implications, issues, and insights for future research and action . Am. Psychol. 76 , 63–77. 10.1037/amp0000716, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Koopman P. L., Wierdsma A. F. M. (1998). “ Participative management ,” in Personnel Psychology: Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology . eds. Drenth P. J. D., Thierry H., de Wolff C. J. (Psychology Press; ), 297–324. [ Google Scholar ]
• Korsgaard M. A., Brodt S. E., Whitener E. M. (2002). Trust in the face of conflict: the role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context . J. Appl. Psychol. 87 :312. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.312 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kozlowski S. W., Gully S. M., Nason E. R., Smith E. M. (1999). “ Developing adaptive teams: a theory of compilation and performance across levels and time ,” in The Changing Nature of Work Performance: Implications for Staffing, Personnel Actions, and Development . Vol. 240 . ed. Pulakos (San Francisco: Jossey Bass; ), 292. [ Google Scholar ]
• Leroy H., Palanski M. E., Simons T. (2012). Authentic leadership and behavioral integrity as drivers of follower commitment and performance . J. Bus. Ethics 107 , 255–264. 10.1007/s10551-011-1036-1 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Li A. N., Liao H. (2014). How do leader–member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model . J. Appl. Psychol. 99 , 847–866. 10.1037/a0037233 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Li M., Liu W., Han Y., Zhang P. (2016). Linking empowering leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior . J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 29 , 732–750. 10.1108/JOCM-02-2015-0032 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Liborius P. (2014). Who is worthy of being followed? The impact of leaders’ character and the moderating role of followers’ personality . J. Psychol. 148 , 347–385. 10.1080/00223980.2013.801335, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lu J., Jiang X., Yu H., Li D. (2015). Building collaborative structures for teachers’ autonomy and self-efficacy: the mediating role of participative management and learning culture . Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 26 , 240–257. 10.1080/09243453.2014.888086 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Masterson S. S., Lewis K., Goldman B. M., Taylor M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships . Acad. Manag. J. 43 , 738–748. 10.2307/1556364 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McKibbin W. J., Fernando R. (2020). The global macroeconomic impacts of COVID-19: seven scenarios . SSRN Electron. J. 10.2139/ssrn.3547729 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Moorman R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? J. Appl. Psychol. 76 :845. 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Moorman R., Darnold T., Priesemuth M. (2013). Perceived leader integrity: supporting the construct validity and utility of a multi-dimensional measure in two samples . Leadersh. Q. 24 , 427–444. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.02.003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mortier A. V., Vlerick P., Clays E. (2016). Authentic leadership and thriving among nurses: the mediating role of empathy . J. Nurs. Manag. 24 , 357–365. 10.1111/jonm.12329, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nadeem M. A., Liu Z., Ghani U., Younis A., Xu Y. (2020). Impact of shared goals on knowledge hiding behavior: the moderating role of trust . Manag. Decis. 10.1108/MD-09-2019-1197 [Epub ahead of print] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Niessen C., Mäder I., Stride C., Jimmieson N. L. (2017). Thriving when exhausted: the role of perceived transformational leadership . J. Vocat. Behav. 103 , 41–51. 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.012 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nix G. A., Ryan R. M., Manly J. B., Deci E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality . J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35 , 266–284. 10.1006/jesp.1999.1382 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nystrom P. C. (1990). Vertical exchanges and organizational commitments of American business managers . Group Organ. Stud. 15 , 296–312. 10.1177/105960119001500305 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Organ D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior . Res. Organ. Behav. 12 , 43–72. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ornell F., Halpern S. C., Kessler F. H. P., Narvaez J. C. D. M. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of healthcare professionals . Cad. Saude Publica. 36 :e00063520. 10.1590/0102-311x00063520 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Orvis K. A., Fisher S. L., Wasserman M. E. (2009). Power to the people: using learner control to improve trainee reactions and learning in web-based instructional environments . J. Appl. Psychol. 94 :960. 10.1037/a0014977 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Palanski M., Kahai S., Yammarino F. J. (2011). Team virtues and performance: an examination of transparency, behavioral integrity and trust . J. Bus. Ethics 99 , 201–216. 10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Peng H., Wei F. (2019). How and when does leader behavioral integrity influence employee voice? The roles of team independence climate and corporate ethical values . J. Bus. Ethics 166 , 505–521. [ Google Scholar ]
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: a review and suggestion for future research . Hum. Perform. 10 , 133–151. 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_5 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Podsakoff N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it . Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63 , 539–569. 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Poon J. M. L. (2006). Trust-in-supervisor and helping coworkers: moderating effect of perceived politics . J. Manag. Psychol. 21 , 518–532. 10.1108/02683940610684373 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Porath C., Spreitzer G., Gibson C., Garnett F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement . J. Organ. Behav. 33 , 250–275. 10.1002/job.756 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Purvanova R. K., Muros J. P. (2010). Gender differences in burnout: a meta-analysis . J. Vocat. Behav. 77 , 168–185. 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.006 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rasool S. F., Wang M., Tang M., Saeed A., Iqbal J. (2021). How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: the mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 :2294. 10.3390/ijerph18052294, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rasool S. F., Wang M., Zhang Y., Samma M. (2020). Sustainable work performance: the roles of workplace violence and occupational stress . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 :912. 10.3390/ijerph17030912, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sagnak M. (2016). Participative leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship: the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation . Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 62 , 181–194. [ Google Scholar ]
• Settele J., Diaz S., Brondizio E., Daszak P. (2020). Stimulus measures must save lives, protect livelihoods, and safeguard nature to reduce the risk of future pandemics . IPBES . [ Google Scholar ]
• Settoon R. P., Bennett N., Liden R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity . J. Appl. Psychol. 81 :219. 10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.219 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Simons T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: the perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus . Organ. Sci. 13 , 18–35. 10.1287/orsc.13.1.18.543 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Simons T., Friedman R., Liu L. A., McLean Parks J. (2007). Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among Black and non-Black employees . J. Appl. Psychol. 92 :650. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.650 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Simons T., Leroy H., Collewaert V., Masschelein S. (2015). How leader alignment of words and deeds affects followers: a meta-analysis of behavioral integrity research . J. Bus. Ethics 132 , 831–844. 10.1007/s10551-014-2332-3 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Somech A. (2003). Relationships of participative leadership with relational demography variables: a multi-level perspective . J. Organ. Behav. 24 , 1003–1018. 10.1002/job.225 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Somech A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams . J. Manag. 32 , 132–157. 10.1177/0149206305277799 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Spreitzer G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation . Acad. Manag. J. 38 , 1442–1465. [ Google Scholar ]
• Spreitzer G., Sutcliffe K., Dutton J., Sonenshein S., Grant A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work . Organ. Sci. 16 , 537–549. 10.1287/orsc.1050.0153 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tariq H., Ding D. (2018). Why am I still doing this job? The examination of family motivation on employees’ work behaviors under abusive supervision . Pers. Rev. 47 , 378–402. 10.1108/PR-07-2016-0162 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Thomas K. W., Velthouse B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: an “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation . Acad. Manag. Rev. 15 , 666–681. [ Google Scholar ]
• Uchino B. N., Berg C. A., Smith T. W., Pearce G., Skinner M. (2006). Age-related differences in ambulatory blood pressure during daily stress: evidence for greater blood pressure reactivity with age . Psychol. Aging 21 , 231. 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.231, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Uhl-Bien M., Arena M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: a theoretical synthesis and integrative framework . Leadersh. Q. 29 , 89–104. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• United Nation (2020). https://www.un.org/en/coronavirus/un-secretary-general
• Usman M., Ghani U., Islam Z. U., Gul H., Mahmood K. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and innovative work behaviors: workplace thriving as a mediator . J. Public Aff. 20 :e2252. 10.1002/pa.2252, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Usman M., Liu Y., Li H., Zhang J., Ghani U., Gul H. (2021). Enabling the engine of workplace thriving through servant leadership: the moderating role of core self-evaluations . J. Manag. Organ. 1–19. 10.1017/jmo.2020.11 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Dyne L., LePine J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity . Acad. Manag. J. 41 , 108–119. [ Google Scholar ]
• Way S. A., Simons T., Leroy H., Tuleja E. A. (2018). What is in it for me? Middle manager behavioral integrity and performance . J. Bus. Ethics 150 , 765–777. 10.1007/s10551-016-3204-9 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yang F., Liu J., Wang Z., Zhang Y. (2019). Feeling energized a multilevel model of spiritual leadership, leader integrity, relational energy, and job performance . J. Bus. Ethics 158 , 983–997. 10.1007/s10551-017-3713-1 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yang J., Mossholder K. W. (2010). Examining the effects of trust in leaders: a bases-and-foci approach . Leadersh. Q. 21 , 50–63. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• World Health Organization (2020). World health organization coronavirus update. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novelcoronavirus-2019 (Accessed May 5, 2020).

Detailed Information

Participative Leadership: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research open access

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Total Views & Downloads

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120) 031-750-5114

COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved. You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

• Communities & Collections
• Researchers

Participative Leadership: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research

Content maybe subject to  copyright     Report

28  citations

2  citations

16,833  citations

5,816  citations

4,757  citations

3,397  citations

1,759  citations

Related Papers (5)

Ask Copilot

Related papers

Related topics

Participative Leadership: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research

Abstract: changes in the external market environment put forward objective requirements for the formulation of organizational strategic plans, making it difficult for the organization’s leaders to make the right and effective decisions quickly on their own. as a result, participative leadership, which encourages and supports employees to participate in the decision-making process of organizations, has received increasing attention in both theory and practice. we searched the literature related to participative leadershi… show more.

Search citation statements

Paper Sections

Citation Types

Year Published

Publication Types

Relationship

Cited by 22 publication s

References 48 publication s, empowering leadership during the covid-19 outbreak: implications for work satisfaction and effectiveness in organizational teams.

The COVID-19 pandemic generated unprecedented challenges for social and organizational life. We set out to explore how empowering leadership and leadership support were affected as a result of the team-based organization starting to implement flexible and remote work practices after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected data in a cross-lagged design and used the two-condition MEMORE mediation procedure to analyze data on work satisfaction and team effectiveness obtained just before and immediately after the COVID-19 outbreak in 34 organizational teams. Our results show that the COVID-19 outbreak did not significantly impact perceptions of empowering leadership or perceived leadership support. However, teams that experienced changes in empowering leadership also reported proportional changes in work satisfaction and effectiveness. Finally, we show that the association between empowering leadership and leadership support, on the one hand, and work satisfaction in teams, on the other hand, is moderated by team size, such that the strength of the association is higher in small rather than large organizational teams. We conclude by arguing that the team-based organization absorbed well the impact and disruptions associated with the COVID-19 outbreak. We also stress the role of empowering leadership as a driver of work satisfaction and the effectiveness of organizational teams.

Person-Oriented Leadership Style and Organizational Commitment in Chinese Universities

Volatile and ever-changing conditions describe the contemporary framework in which organizations must conduct their operations. One of the most important components of gaining a competitive edge in order to meet such challenges is to guarantee that employees are committed, that they identify with the business, and that they accept its principles and aims as reflecting their own interests. Employees are crucial to an organization's success, particularly when their contentment affects client satisfaction; hence, organizations must view their staff as their first clients. As a result of this, the goal of this study is to examine the beneficial association between person-oriented leadership style and organizational commitment among China University managers. For a better understanding of the study, which strives to explain the concept of leadership and its behavior in order to achieve effectiveness in the education industry, the following objectives are outlined. Clearly, the researcher aims to comprehend the concept of organizational commitment so as to develop knowledge. Social Exchange Theory has been utilized for this investigation. This study is successful in developing a framework based on the literatures on person-oriented leadership and the measuring of the relationship towards organizational commitment. The debate demonstrated that the capacity of leaders to effectively integrate participatory and consultative styles in the execution of everyday tasks increased organizational commitment. This result from prior study is also supported by the proposed conceptual framework, which will be undertaken primarily in the context of the Chinese mainland. This study's debate indirectly enhances the leadership qualities of Chinese university leaders and administrators. The authorities of the education system and administration will get an awareness of the competency of each leader and will be able to incorporate this knowledge into training and competency modules as a result of this study.

Sustainable leadership: A literature review and prospects for future research

The various social issues that accompany economic development pose new challenges for leaders to integrate economic benefits, social responsibility, and environmental protection. In this context, various new leadership styles have emerged. Among them, sustainable leadership reveals the key role of leaders in balancing the triple goals of economy, society and environment, and has become an important part of leadership theory research in recent years. We searched the literature related to sustainable leadership in databases such as Web of Science, EBSCO and CNKI. Based on the existing literature, we systematically review the origins, connotations, analytical perspectives, measurement methods, and conceptual comparisons of sustainable leadership. And we also construct an integrated analytical framework of sustainable leadership on the premise of sorting out and summarizing the antecedents and consequences of sustainable leadership. Finally, we provide an outlook on the future research areas of sustainable leadership in order to further promote research of sustainable leadership.

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

[email protected]

334 Leonard St

Brooklyn, NY 11211

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Changes in the external market environment put forward objective requirements for the formulation of organizational strategic plans, making it difficult for the organization’s leaders to make the right and effective decisions quickly on their own. As a result, participative leadership, which encourages and supports employees to participate in the decision-making process of organizations, has received increasing attention in both theory and practice. We searched the literature related to participative leadership in databases such as Web of Science, EBSCO, ProQuest, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Based on this, we clarify the concept of participative leadership, propose a definition of participative leadership, summarize measurement scales for this type of leadership, and compare participative leadership with other leadership styles (empowering leadership and directive leadership). We also present a research framework for participative leadership that demonstrates its antecedents; the mechanisms for its development based on social exchange theory, conservation of resources theory, social cognitive theory; social information processing theory, and implicit leadership theory; and outcomes. Finally, we identify five potential research areas: Connotation, antecedents, outcomes, mediators and moderators, and study of participative leadership in China.