assignment

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

Select Your Language

Infrastructure and management.

  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux
  • Red Hat Virtualization
  • Red Hat Identity Management
  • Red Hat Directory Server
  • Red Hat Certificate System
  • Red Hat Satellite
  • Red Hat Subscription Management
  • Red Hat Update Infrastructure
  • Red Hat Insights
  • Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Cloud Computing

Integration and Automation

ntpd process bind() cannot assign requested address

Environment

investigate a matter of the following log messages;

The contents of the message were going to do the same period at the time using an address that a target address was not assigned or does not exist on a current machine when it perform synchronization of the time on a part equivalent to [ipv6 Addr], but it is in a message saying that it was impossible.

In other words it is judged that an applicable message was output because host received EADDRNOTAVAIL of error code 99 from bind() function when it was going to do string charge account (bind) to port 123 using an address of ipv6. ※ ntpd goes to refer to both ipv4, ipv6 addresses as synchronization at the time in specifications.

When there is not it and measures do not use ipv6 address on the network where an applicable host supports ipv6, it is thought that it does't carry out the map with the ipv6 address by ntp service with an effective method by unloading ipv6 module.

When there is not an applicable host in ipv6 address band and when it's going to map ipv6 address, for a cause, it occurs.

This solution is part of Red Hat’s fast-track publication program, providing a huge library of solutions that Red Hat engineers have created while supporting our customers. To give you the knowledge you need the instant it becomes available, these articles may be presented in a raw and unedited form.

Formatting Tips

Here are the common uses of Markdown.

Request Japanese Translation

Generating machine translation.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

How to fix "[SEVERE]: bind() failed: Cannot assign requested address (99)" while starting chromedriver

I downloaded the latest version of chromedriver in Centos 7 platform: https://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com/index.html?path=74.0.3729.6/ I start chromedriver and get this error.

How can I solve this?

enter image description here

Timo Tijhof's user avatar

8 Answers 8

In my case running chromedriver with --verbose flag helped to figure out the issue:

Chrome attempted to listen on IPv6 address, which was not enabled in Docker. You can either enable IPv6 support (which works only on Linux host) or ignore the error since chromedriver process will be listening on IPv4 anyway.

Yaroslav Admin's user avatar

In one line: you need to pass --whitelisted-ips= into chrome driver (not chrome!)

You can do it in different way (depend on your env setup):

If you use ChromeDriver locally/directly (not using RemoteWebDriver) from code, just insert lines below before ChromeDriver init

If you use it remotely (eg. selenium hub/grid) you need to set system property when node starts, like in command:

or docker by passing JAVA_OPTS env

GetoX's user avatar

I managed to workaround by adding argument as shown below (Python)

This is from Google's troubleshooting tips :

By default, Docker runs a container with a /dev/shm shared memory space 64MB. This is typically too small for Chrome and will cause Chrome to crash when rendering large pages. To fix, run the container with docker run --shm-size=1gb to increase the size of /dev/shm . Since Chrome 65, this is no longer necessary. Instead, launch the browser with the --disable-dev-shm-usage flag

Stephen Ostermiller's user avatar

The cause lay somewhere else. I was running chrome on docker container and for me this was solved when the driver was run in a headless mode.

Results: Now tests run successfully, without any errors.

Tony Joseph's user avatar

I had the same issue in my team, but in our case the solution is completely new. Probably because the root cause is different, although the visible error message was the same.

The issue started to occur in our CI/CD pipeline 5 days ago. We realised that at the same time new selenium/standalone-chrome docker image was pushed to selenium docker hub.

https://hub.docker.com/r/selenium/standalone-chrome/tags

That latest image caused this error. It never happened before during 1.5 year period. But it happened with that latest image. Digest of that image: 9943ba9d2a89e984080f5681b390229fb47f7d3bb732e4f440456fc52335bae8

The solution was reverting the image used by our Jenkins to the selenium/standalone-chrome docker image that was pushed 21 days ago. Digest: bc4023992691ab8e2f20297f334fdcddd982928fbd969239b39b3dbc2dfc0657

We are planning to check the new images to come for compatibility with our CI/CD so that we can get back up to date with the latest selenium images

justnpT's user avatar

I had the similar problem; and my issue was i did not quit the existing driver and tried to use again. driver.quit() solved my problem.

Emre Bayram's user avatar

In my case, there we 2 docker containers running and the port 4444 used by selenium. Closing one container solved the issue for the other one. The message is still there, but the tests are running. Earlier they were getting stuck.

Ravindra's user avatar

I encountered this when trying to run tests (Java) in a container ubuntu:20.04 . Extracted the following from this guidance Selenium: WebDriverException:Chrome failed to start: crashed as google-chrome is no longer running so ChromeDriver is assuming that Chrome has crashed

There are threads stating --no-sandbox has to be first, but I experimented and this was not necessary, at least in Java.

Your Answer

Sign up or log in, post as a guest.

Required, but never shown

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service , privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged linux selenium-chromedriver or ask your own question .

Hot Network Questions

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

Your privacy

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy .

You are not logged in.

Topic closed

#1 2010-12-26 22:11:52

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

[SOLVED] noobish question about ntp and ipv6

Hi, Hi , yesterday I decided to install ntp. And while it appears to be doing its job fine, there is a troublesome message popping up in my /var/log/error.log.

/var/log/errors.log

IPv6 is disabled at my router as well as in /etc/ufw/sysctl.conf

hence the ntpd complaint. But I was wondering why is is trying to make that connection in the first place?

Here is my /etc/ntp.conf

and my /etc/hosts

the output of ntpq -p

and finally /var/log/ntp.log

I am a noob and so I'm sure it's something quite simple but after a considerable amount of time searching and perusing the wiki I'm coming up empty. I would very much appreciate any help. Thanks.

Last edited by disastrophe (2010-12-28 00:18:02)

"If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities." ~ Voltaire

#2 2010-12-27 01:23:19

Re: [solved] noobish question about ntp and ipv6.

you can find all the command-line switches you can pass to ntpd in 'man ntpd', there's a -4 option for ipv4 only

the daemon scripts sources /etc/conf.d/ntp-client.conf so you just need to add the switch to NTPD_ARGS

Last edited by thestinger (2010-12-27 01:23:45)

#3 2010-12-28 00:17:01

Thank you very much! The daemon config location somehow eluded me. Marking as solved.

#4 2010-12-28 00:24:35

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy

#5 2014-09-29 16:22:17

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

Since this thread comes up high in google searches even now at the end of September 2014, I thought I'd give the proper answer here for Arch with systemd:

First, get the current command being started by systemd:

    cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/ntpd.service

And you should find a line starting with ExecStart, like this:

    ExecStart=/usr/bin/ntpd -g -u ntp:ntp

You should not edit that file directly since it will be overwriting on update. Instead, follow the directions in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sy … unit_files , which currently suggests you do something like the following:

Edit a new file (obviously as root) called

    /etc/systemd/system/ntpd.service.d/customexec.conf

(The directory ..../ntpd.service.d/ probably already exists and is empty, but if not, create it.)

Put the following into it:

[Service] ExecStart= ExecStart=/usr/bin/ntpd -4 -g -u ntp:ntp

Which first clears the previous ExecStart, and then replaces it with one that includes the -4 flag. I tried just editing the /etc/ntp.conf file first to put the -4 flag in there, but that conf file is basically ignored because the flags to be run are listed in the systemd service file.

#6 2015-01-19 15:13:16

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

@colikeenan, nice solution! Only one minor adjustment, I believe it is more systematic to simply through

and input what you suggested, that is,

Optionally,

My question would be shouldn't systemd take care of this automatically (i.e. detect if IPv6 makes sense and act accordingly)?

#7 2015-01-19 15:43:55

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

If the issue is that common, you should add it to the wiki instead of necrobumping a 4-year old thread.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/IP … r_programs <--- there

big_smile

Last edited by Alad (2015-01-19 15:45:54)

Mods are just community members who have the occasionally necessary option to move threads around and edit posts. -- Trilby

#8 2015-01-19 16:03:00

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

This. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fo … Bumping.27

Arch + dwm    •    Mercurial repos   •    Surfraw

Registered Linux User #482438

Board footer

Atom topic feed

Powered by FluxBB

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It only takes a minute to sign up.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

iperf returning “bind failed: cannot assign requested address” in Windows XP and 7

I am trying to set up iperf on an old HP server running Windows XP Professional to test multicast, but whenever I issue the command iperf -s -u -B <ip address> , it returns:

bind failed: Cannot assign requested address

It doesn't matter what I put as the IP address (224.0.0.1, 192.168.150.123, 10.254.1.11 were each tested unsuccessfully), it generates exactly the same error. Using different ports with the "-p" flag also has zero effect (iperf defaults to 5001; I have also tried 50, 99, 5002, 8000, 9000).

However, if I use the server's actual IP address (10.254.1.10), the iperf service starts up without any problems. The symptoms are identical on my Windows 7 x64 laptop.

I have looked online for the past few days and I see many people reporting this problem, but I don't see any applicable solutions (the bind error alone tends to be associated with people writing their own code, and it's association with iperf specifically tends to garner no useful answers), so I would really appreciate any assistance, I am tearing my hair out over this vague Windows error.

I am using the precompiled version of iperf 2.0.5-2-win32, but I at this point I don't mind downloading the source, editing it, and compiling it myself if that's the only way to solve this...I just don't have any C++ experience, so I can't go bug-hunting on my own.

Liesmith's user avatar

Try a version built without Cygwin from the download page .

I was having the same problem and with version 2.0.8 (12 jan 2015 Windows 32 bits) worked

mabagu's user avatar

Your Answer

Sign up or log in, post as a guest.

Required, but never shown

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service , privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged windows-7 networking windows-xp multicast iperf or ask your own question .

Hot Network Questions

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

Your privacy

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy .

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

some warnings id like help to fix possibly?

By comet424 April 18, 2019 in General Support

Recommended Posts

hi  I just checking the syslog  as Fix Common Issues finds errors  but never shows any errors

i tried googling some of these warrnings but i cant find any info... if anyone knows be great  so i can fix the errors... also i changed the ssh port  yet its still stating 22 also... and i try  ssh [email protected] :2000   and i cant connect

but maybe you guys know

here is if the warnings 

on my second server i get these errors

and im guessing the login  for the port  22 is ok  as i checked the Login button and that's what showed

Link to comment

JorgeB

A bios update might fix some of the ACPI related errors, but none of those are something to worry about.

Like

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest

×   Pasted as rich text.    Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.    Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.    Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sophos Community

UTM Firewall

NTP errors after enabling IPv6

AdamTyler

Getting tons of the syslog info warnings after enabling IPv6..  Sophos UTM 9 bug?

2017:01:16-13:39:36 fwhostname-1 ntpd[27946]: unable to create socket on eth4 (2175) for 2001::1#123 <-----IPv6 address redacted.

2017:01:16-13:45:04 fwhostname-1 ntpd[27946]: bind(41) AF_INET6 2001::1#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested address <-----IPv6 address redacted.

2017:01:16-13:56:12 fwhostname-1 ntpd[9482]: failed to init interface for address 2001::1 <-----IPv6 address redacted.

NTP config in the firewall is set to use pool.ntp.org.  Looks like it resolves to an IPv4 address automatically.

Firmware version: 9.409-9 Pattern version: 116407

flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement . We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Task 0 failed : Cannot assign requested address #13

@Sebastien-Raguideau

Sebastien-Raguideau commented Jul 30, 2019 • edited

@flass

flass commented Jul 30, 2019

Sorry, something went wrong.

Sebastien-Raguideau commented Jul 31, 2019

Flass commented jul 31, 2019 • edited, sebastien-raguideau commented aug 1, 2019, flass commented aug 1, 2019.

@flass

No branches or pull requests

@flass

Log in or Sign up

Services attempt to assign ipv6 addresses before ready.

Discussion in ' Installation/Configuration ' started by Nolan , Sep 21, 2017 .

Nolan Member

Taken from /var/log/syslog, running Debian 9. I need to run dibbler or dhclient (the behavior below occurs on both, unfortunately) before attempting to bind the addresses. If I reboot, I need to restart the services after the fact for them to work properly. Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: bind(25) AF_INET6 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::5#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested address Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: unable to create socket on eno1 (9) for 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::5#123 Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: failed to init interface for address 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::5 Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: bind(25) AF_INET6 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::4#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested address Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: unable to create socket on eno1 (10) for 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::4#123 Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: failed to init interface for address 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::4 Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: bind(25) AF_INET6 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::3#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested address Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: unable to create socket on eno1 (11) for 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::3#123 Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: failed to init interface for address 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::3 Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: bind(25) AF_INET6 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::2#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested address Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd[1384]: unable to create socket on eno1 (12) for 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::2#123 Sep 21 00:09:43 octave postfix/postfix-script[1677]: starting the Postfix mail system Sep 21 00:09:43 octave postfix/master[1687]: fatal: bind 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::3 port 25: Cannot assign requested address Sep 21 00:09:44 octave postfix/master[1682]: fatal: daemon initialization failure Sep 21 00:09:45 octave postfix/postfix-script[1875]: fatal: mail system startup failed Sep 21 00:09:46 octave systemd[1]: [email protected] : Control process exited, code=exited status=1 Sep 21 00:09:46 octave systemd[1]: Failed to start Postfix Mail Transport Agent (instance -). Sep 21 00:09:46 octave systemd[1]: [email protected] : Unit entered failed state. Sep 21 00:09:46 octave systemd[1]: [email protected] : Failed with result 'exit-code'. Any ideas on how I can solve this problem?  
Anyone have any ideas?  
If anyone could help me solve this, that would be greatly appreciated. If you need additional logs or other information, please let me know.  

florian030 ISPConfig Developer ISPConfig Developer

did you add the ip to the master.cf from postfix and the bind-config?  
florian030 said: ↑ did you add the ip to the master.cf from postfix and the bind-config? Click to expand...
Any other ideas? My host unfortunately is no help in this situation.  

Share This Page

Useful searches.

IMAGES

  1. Bind Failed Cannot Assign Requested Address

    flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

  2. Failed to set up listener: SocketException: Cannot assign requested address when using hostname

    flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

  3. Cannot Assign Requested Address

    flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

  4. assign_user_flags

    flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

  5. assign_user_flags

    flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

  6. astra linux 1.5 exim4

    flags 0x11 failed cannot assign requested address

VIDEO

  1. Caillou For Hire #1: 7-11

  2. Gary Grigsby's War In The West, DDay Part 2

  3. Apple iTunes Store : Bad Message 400

  4. A letter to the Editor

  5. Binomial Expansion and Simplification

  6. Biden Judicial Nominee Failed Senator's Constitutional Pop Quiz:Identity Politics Is So BAD!

COMMENTS

  1. Can't SSH into Google Cloud Engine. Boot errors - Stack Overflow

    Oct 16 16:29:01 instance-1 ntpd[668]: bind(21) AF_INET6 fe80::4001:aff:fe8e:2%2#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested address Oct 16 16:29:01 instance-1 ntpd[668]: unable to create socket on eth0 (5) for fe80::4001:aff:fe8e:2%2#123 Oct 16 16:29:01 instance-1 ntpd[668]: failed to init interface for address fe80::4001:aff:fe8e:2%2 Oct 16 ...

  2. ntpd process bind() cannot assign requested address - Red Hat ...

    When there is not an applicable host in ipv6 address band and when it's going to map ipv6 address, for a cause, it occurs. Ex. Raw With /etc/sysconfig/network file NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is changed to NETWORKING_IPV6=no or Raw With /etc/modprobe.conf file alias net-pf-10 off options ipv6 disable=1 Product (s) Red Hat Enterprise Linux Component ntp

  3. How to fix "[SEVERE]: bind() failed: Cannot assign requested ...

    8 Answers Sorted by: 39 In my case running chromedriver with --verbose flag helped to figure out the issue: [1564749154.010] [SEVERE]: bind () failed: Cannot assign requested address (99) [1564749154.011] [INFO]: listen on IPv6 failed with error ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID Chrome attempted to listen on IPv6 address, which was not enabled in Docker.

  4. [SOLVED] noobish question about ntp and ipv6 - Arch Linux

    Dec 26 13:54:18 localhost ntpd [2142]: bind (20) AF_INET6 fe80::21e:8cff:fe76:6287%2#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested address Dec 26 13:54:18 localhost ntpd [2142]: unable to create socket on eth0 (4) for fe80::21e:8cff:fe76:6287#123 IPv6 is disabled at my router as well as in /etc/ufw/sysctl.conf net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1

  5. iperf returning “bind failed: cannot assign requested address ...

    Failed to connect to server: The requested address is a broadcast address, but the appropriate flag was not set 8 Set MAC address fails - RTNETLINK answers: Cannot assign requested address

  6. some warnings id like help to fix possibly? - Unraid

    Apr 17 20:40:44 Tower ntpd [1838]: bind (19) AF_INET6 fe80::68a0:9cff:fef4:afc1%10#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested address Apr 17 20:40:44 Tower ntpd [1838]: failed to init interface for address fe80::68a0:9cff:fef4:afc1%10 Apr 17 20:41:00 Tower sshd [1826]: Received signal 15; terminating.

  7. NTP errors after enabling IPv6 - General Discussion - Sophos

    2017:01:16-13:56:12 fwhostname-1 ntpd [9482]: failed to init interface for address 2001::1 <-----IPv6 address redacted. NTP config in the firewall is set to use pool.ntp.org. Looks like it resolves to an IPv4 address automatically. Firmware version: 9.409-9. Pattern version: 116407.

  8. Task 0 failed : Cannot assign requested address #13 - GitHub

    I don't know much about it, but a quick internet search suggest it might be an issue of domain name resolution due to the address being under the new protocol IPv6, see debian-pi/raspbian-ua-netinst#495. That apprently is fixable by setting the dns:order variable in the ~/.lftprc configuration file as:

  9. Synology Community

    2022-04-02T15:53:03+02:00 DS918 ntpd [6542]: unable to create socket on docker6e61ca5 (40601) for fe80::bc1a:28ff:fe7c:7d17%55111#123. Neither the DS itself nor Docker does have IPv6 enabled, nor does the entire LAN. I've configured the time service to synchronize with another DS (my primary Directory Server), which obviouly works (tested with ...

  10. Services attempt to assign ipv6 addresses before ready

    Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd [1384]: bind (25) AF_INET6 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::3#123 flags 0x11 failed: Cannot assign requested address Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd [1384]: unable to create socket on eno1 (11) for 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::3#123 Sep 21 00:09:43 octave ntpd [1384]: failed to init interface for address 2001:bc8:3ca9:101::3