meaning of management representation letter

What is a Management Representation Letter?

Getting through financial audits can be frustrating for companies, especially when asked to provide management representation letters.

This article will clarify exactly what a management representation letter is, why auditors request them, what should be included, and provide examples to make the process smooth and compliant.

You'll learn the purpose of these letters, see template examples, understand international audit standards, and gain key takeaways to improve financial reporting at your organization.

Introduction to Management Representation Letters

A management representation letter is a formal document signed by a company's senior management that is provided to external auditors. It contains certain written representations that auditors require in order to complete an audit and form an opinion on the company's financial statements.

Defining the Management Representation Letter in Audit Context

The management representation letter serves an important role within the financial statement audit process. Auditors use it as audit evidence to support their assessment of whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Specifically, auditors request written confirmation from management regarding the accuracy and completeness of information provided during the audit. This includes representations related to:

• The financial statements and adequacy of disclosures
• Proper recording of transactions and account balances
• Internal controls over financial reporting
• Compliance with laws and regulations

By obtaining these written representations from management, auditors gain additional audit evidence to complete their testing and analysis. The management representation letter also outlines management's responsibilities under the audit engagement.

Essential Components of a Management Representation Letter

A standard management representation letter contains certain key statements that auditors rely upon. These include:

• Financial statement disclosures : Confirmation that management has provided the auditors with all relevant information and access needed to perform the audit.
• Recognition, measurement and disclosure : Assertion that the financial statements comply with the applicable financial reporting framework and standards.
• Non-compliance : Disclosure of any non-compliance with laws and regulations.
• Litigation and claims : Details of any actual, pending or threatened litigation and claims that could impact the financial statements.

The letter will also typically list areas of significant estimates and judgments made by management in preparing the financial statements. For example, allowances for doubtful accounts, asset impairment assessments, and assumptions used in valuation models.

By obtaining written representation on these matters, auditors gain evidence to issue their audit opinion. The management representation letter should be signed by the CEO and CFO or equivalent members of senior management.

Legal and Ethical Implications of Management Representations

Signing a management representation letter has legal and ethical implications. Management must ensure representations made to the auditors are accurate and made in good faith. Intentionally misrepresenting information or omitting relevant details could constitute fraud and result in legal liability.

Auditors also have a duty to assess the reasonableness of management representations and corroborate them with other audit evidence. Relying solely on management representations without further verification could call into question the quality of the audit.

Overall, the management representation letter facilitates open and transparent communication between management and auditors. It serves as a legally binding confirmation of management's fulfillment of its financial reporting responsibilities.

What is the main purpose of a management representation letter?

The main purpose of a management representation letter is to obtain written confirmation from management that they have fulfilled their responsibility for the fair presentation of the financial statements. This letter documents that management has provided the auditors with all relevant information and access needed to conduct the audit.

Some key purposes of the management representation letter include:

Confirming management's responsibility for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework (e.g. GAAP or IFRS).

Affirming that management has provided the auditors with all relevant information and access to records, documentation and personnel that is necessary for the audit.

Disclosing any instances of fraud involving management, employees with significant internal control roles, or those that cause a material misstatement of the financial statements.

Presenting details on matters that impact the financial statements - such as plans or intentions that may affect asset/liability carrying values, information about related parties, contingencies, subsequent events, etc.

Stating that all transactions have been recorded and are reflected in the financial statements. This helps confirm completeness and cut-off assertions.

So in summary, the management representation letter serves as important audit evidence that validates information provided by management to the auditors. It also formally documents management's responsibilities and representations concerning the financial statements.

What is the meaning of management representation?

Management representation refers to written confirmation provided by management of an entity to the auditors regarding the accuracy and completeness of financial statements and adequacy of internal controls.

The management representation letter is a key audit evidence prepared at the completion of the audit process. It contains management's assertions regarding:

• Fair presentation of financial statements
• Completeness of information provided to auditors
• Proper accounting policies used
• Reasonableness of significant estimates made

Essentially, through this letter, management takes responsibility for the fair presentation of the financial statements. They confirm to the auditors that they have fulfilled their financial reporting responsibilities.

The management representation letter covers all periods encompassed by the audit report and is dated the same date as the completion of audit fieldwork. It is addressed to the engagement partner and signed by those with appropriate responsibilities for the financial statements, usually the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

By obtaining written representations from management, the auditors demonstrate they have obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support their audit opinion. The representations serve as necessary supplementary corroboration of management's oral assertions made during the audit.

In summary, the management representation letter is a written statement from management provided to the auditors as part of the audit evidence. It confirms management's compliance with financial reporting responsibilities to enable auditors to form their audit opinion.

What is an example of a management representation letter?

We are providing this letter in connection with your audit of the cost representation statement of USAID resources managed by (Client Name) under Contract No. XXX “Project Name” for the period MM/DD/YY to MM/DD/YY.

We confirm, to the best of our knowledge and belief, the following representations made to you during your audit:

• We have made available to you all financial records and related data, including service auditor reports.
• There have been no communications from regulatory agencies concerning noncompliance with or deficiencies on financial reporting practices.
• We have no knowledge of any known or suspected fraudulent financial reporting or misappropriation of assets involving management or employees with significant roles in internal control.
• We have disclosed to you the results of our assessment of risk that the cost representation statement may be materially misstated as a result of fraud.
• There are no material transactions that have not been properly recorded in the accounting records.
• We believe the effects of any uncorrected financial statement misstatements aggregated by you are immaterial.
• We have disclosed all liabilities, both actual and contingent.
• There are no violations or possible violations of laws or regulations whose effects should be considered.

We confirm that the representations we have made to you during your audit are complete, truthful, and accurate.

Sincerely, [Signature] [Client Representative Name and Title]

What is the difference between management letter and management representation letter?

The key differences between a management letter and a management representation letter in an audit are:

Focus : The management letter focuses on identifying weaknesses and areas of improvement in the company's financial reporting process and internal controls. Management representation, on the other hand, focuses on providing evidence of management's understanding and support of the audit process.

Purpose : The purpose of a management letter is to communicate deficiencies in internal control and make suggestions for improvements. The purpose of a management representation letter is to confirm certain information that the auditors have requested from management.

Content : A management letter contains comments and recommendations from the auditor about issues encountered during the audit. A management representation letter contains specific statements by management regarding matters such as the fairness of financial statements.

Timing : A management letter is typically issued after the audit report while a management representation letter is obtained during the audit.

In summary, while both letters relate to the audit process, the management letter aims to provide suggestions for improvement while the management representation letter serves as audit evidence regarding management's assertions. The management representation letter supports the audit by confirming the accuracy of the financial statements.

sbb-itb-beb59a9

The purpose and importance of management representation letters.

Management representation letters serve several key purposes in the audit process. Most importantly, they provide additional audit evidence to support the auditor's opinion on the financial statements.

Reinforcing the Auditor's Collection of Audit Evidences

Management representation letters reinforce the audit evidence the auditor has already obtained throughout the audit. As outlined in ISA 500 Audit Evidence, auditors must obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to support their opinion. The letter serves as written representation from management on important assertions related to the financial statements. This includes the completeness and accuracy of information provided to the auditor.

Management's Accountability for Financial Reporting

Additionally, the letter highlights management's responsibilities over financial reporting. Management, not the auditor, is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements. The representation letter formally documents that management has fulfilled these duties, a key assertion needed to issue an audit opinion.

Assurance on Contingent and Off-Balance-Sheet Liabilities

Auditors also rely on management's representations on significant estimates and disclosures. This includes assurance from management that the financial statements appropriately reflect contingent liabilities and off-balance-sheet liabilities in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.

In summary, representation letters serve as a final confirmation from management that they have fulfilled their financial reporting responsibilities. The letters provide key audit evidence and accountability to support the auditor's work in accordance with auditing standards.

Drafting a Management Representation Letter: Best Practices

A management representation letter is an important part of the audit process. It documents certain written representations made by management to the auditors regarding the company's financial statements.

Drafting an effective management representation letter requires following several best practices:

Management Representation Letter Template: A Starting Point

When creating a management representation letter, it's best to start with a template. This ensures all relevant topics are covered such as:

• Management's responsibility for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements
• Availability of all financial records and related data
• Completeness of information provided regarding transactions and events
• Disclosure of all liabilities, both actual and contingent
• Non-existence of any fraud or illegal acts

Tailor the template to the specific circumstances and transactions of the business. But the template establishes a solid foundation.

Who Should Sign the Management Representation Letter

Typically the management representation letter should be signed by:

• The CEO or Managing Director
• The CFO or Financial Controller

This demonstrates the company's overall governance has reviewed the representations and attests to their validity and completeness.

In some cases, representation from heads of divisions or departments may also be necessary regarding transactions or activities under their specific purview.

Customizing Representations to Reflect Unique Organizational Circumstances

While a template is useful, each management representation letter must be customized to reflect the distinct transactions and activities of the organization. Specifically call out areas the auditors have highlighted as potential risks or requiring further representations.

For example, if the company underwent a major acquisition, restructuring, or system implementation, representations would be needed to address the associated impacts and risks regarding financial reporting.

The management representation letter is not a mere formality. It serves as an indispensable record of the critical dialogue between management and auditors. Following these best practices helps craft letters that clearly communicate important representations.

Management Representation Letter Samples and Examples

Management representation letters are important documents in the financial audit process. They contain written confirmation from management about the accuracy and completeness of financial statements and disclosures. Reviewing examples can help companies understand what to include in their own letters.

Analyzing a Management Representation Letter Sample

Here is an excerpt from a sample management representation letter:

We acknowledge our responsibility for the fair presentation in the financial statements of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We have provided you with unrestricted access to persons within the Company...

This excerpt demonstrates several key elements:

• Acknowledgment of management's responsibility for financial statements conforming to GAAP
• Confirmation that auditors had full access to people and information

Other standard inclusions are statements around contingent liabilities, litigation matters, plans or intentions that may affect assets or liabilities, and confirmation that appropriate disclosures have been made.

Analyzing examples helps identify customary terms to include.

Management Representation Letter PDF: Accessibility and Format

Management representation letters are often provided to auditors as PDF files. This locked, uneditable format:

• Facilitates easy sharing of the definitive final version
• Allows clear version control with digital signatures
• Enables reliable long-term archival storage

PDF format removes ambiguity around which representation letter version was relied upon.

Real-World Examples: Complex Issues

Consider these excerpts from real-world representation letters:

"The restructuring provision of $20 million represents our best estimate of costs to complete the plant closure based on current plans..."

"We confirm that we have properly recorded and disclosed the acquisition of Company XYZ in the financial statements..."

These excerpts demonstrate how companies transparently address complex real situations like restructurings or major transactions in the representation letter.

Real examples provide assurance that the company has appropriately considered complex accounting matters.

Comparing Management Letters and Management Representation Letters

Management letters and management representation letters serve important but distinct purposes in the audit process.

Management Letter vs Management Representation Letter: Clarifying the Distinction

A management letter communicates deficiencies or recommendations for improvement identified by the auditor during the audit. These may relate to internal controls, processes, or compliance issues that could be made more effective.

In contrast, a management representation letter obtained near the end of an audit contains specific written representations from management about the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements and disclosures. Common representations confirm that:

• Financial statements are fairly presented
• Significant assumptions used by management are reasonable
• All relevant information has been provided to the auditor
• There are no undisclosed side agreements or contingencies

While management letters offer suggestions, representation letters confirm critical facts underlying the audit.

The Role of the Auditor in Relation to Management Representations

Auditors use both tools to fulfill their responsibilities:

Management letters reflect the auditor's duty to communicate control deficiencies to those charged with governance. This allows the entity to take timely remedial action.

Representation letters provide audit evidence as part of the auditor's risk assessment procedures under auditing standards. They represent a form of documentary evidence about management's intents, knowledge and accuracy of the financial statements.

If management were unwilling to sign the representation letter, the auditor would need to reconsider their audit opinion.

Impact on Audit Opinions and Auditor's Reports

The management letter has no direct bearing on the auditor's opinion, unless the issues it raises cast doubt on the fairness of the financial statements.

However, matters raised in the representation letter directly relate to the audit evidence obtained. If management refuses to sign the letter, the auditor would likely issue a qualified opinion or disclaimer of opinion on the financial statements due to the limitation on audit scope and evidence.

In summary, while management letters offer helpful recommendations, representation letters provide the auditor written confirmation of critical information pertinent to the audit itself. Both play key roles in the audit process.

International Standards on Auditing: ISA 580 Management Representations

The International Standards on Auditing (ISA) provide a framework for conducting high quality external audits. ISA 580 specifically focuses on obtaining appropriate written representations from management to support the audit evidence gathered.

Understanding ISA 580 and Its Relevance to Management Representation Letters

ISA 580 outlines the auditor's responsibilities for obtaining written representations from management to confirm certain matters or to support other audit evidence. Some key points:

• Requires auditors to obtain written representations from management that they have fulfilled their financial reporting responsibilities
• Covers areas like recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of information as per the financial reporting framework
• Helps auditors obtain confirmation on matters material to the financial statements, like the completeness of information provided
• Allows for detection of material misstatements due to fraud

By adhering to ISA 580, auditors can ensure management representation letters align with the necessary audit evidence requirements.

Compliance with International Standards on Auditing

It is critical that management representation letters comply with ISA guidelines, including:

• Obtaining representations from appropriate individuals : Those with overall responsibility for financial reporting, such as the CEO and CFO
• Written format : Printed on the organization's letterhead and signed by hand
• Date : No earlier than the date of the audit report
• Wording : Clear acknowledgement of responsibilities, accuracy of information provided, etc.

Strict compliance ensures the representations constitute valid and appropriate audit evidence as per ISA 500.

Case Studies: Adherence to ISA 580 in Practice

Company A - Drafted a management representation letter that was vague, unsigned, and outdated. By not adhering to ISA 580, they had to invest additional time and resources to obtain proper representations.

Company B - Carefully followed ISA 580 requirements. The CFO and CEO signed off on a letter confirming completeness of information and awareness of responsibilities. This aligned smoothly with the audit process.

As exemplified, non-compliance ultimately wastes time and resources. Whereas alignment with ISA 580 standards helps streamline external audits.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Management representation letters are important, standard audit evidence that reduce risk. They signify management's representations concerning the financial statements and accountability for internal controls, fraud, and information provided to auditors.

Summarizing the Role of Management Representation Letters in Audits

Management representation letters summarize key information and representations from management to auditors. They serve several key functions:

• Confirm management's responsibility for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements
• Disclose any issues or deficiencies in internal controls
• Affirm that all relevant information has been provided to auditors
• Highlight any fraud, illegal acts, or noncompliance with laws and regulations

By obtaining these written representations, auditors reduce engagement risk and confirm their understanding of management's views and positions.

Final Thoughts on Best Practices and Compliance

It is critical that management representation letters adhere to regulations and professional standards. Key best practices include:

• Ensuring the letter is dated as of the date of the auditor's report
• Having the letter signed by those with appropriate responsibilities and authority
• Disclosing all relevant issues completely and accurately
• Following the guidelines and requirements outlined in ISA 580 and other applicable standards

Diligent compliance promotes accuracy, transparency, and accountability.

Encouraging Diligence and Transparency in Financial Reporting

At their core, management representation letters aim to foster diligent, truthful, and transparent financial reporting. By eliciting key written representations from management, auditors promote an environment of responsibility, compliance, and ethical practice. This ultimately supports the accuracy and reliability of financial statements for all stakeholders.

Related posts

• What is Transfer Pricing?
• Related Party Disclosures in Financial Statements
• Statutory Audit vs Internal Audit
• Financial Statement Presentation: Structure and Requirements

How to Manage Subscriptions in Xero: Handling Recurring Billing

Form 3800: General Business Credit Overview

Schedule A (Form 1120-PC): Computation of Taxable Income for Property and Casualty Insurance Companies

We've received your job requirements, and our team is working hard to find the perfect candidate for you. If you have more job openings available, feel free to submit another job description, and we'll be happy to assist you. 

• Submit a New Job Description

Unlock the Talent Your Business Deserves

Hire Accounting and Finance Professionals from South America.

• Start Interviewing For Free

Management Representation Letter: Format, Content, Signature

Home » Bookkeeping » Management Representation Letter: Format, Content, Signature

As of 2019, the FASB requires publicly traded companies to prepare financial statements following the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Auditors are required by professional standards to report, in writing, internal control matters that they believe should be brought to the attention of those charged with governance (the board). Generally, if your auditor is going to put an internal control matter in a letter, they have assessed that the matter was the result of a deficiency in internal controls. This is an important part of that audit that the profession does not take lightly.

One common example of a deficiency in internal control that’s severe enough to be considered a material weakness or significant deficiency is when an organization lacks the knowledge and training to prepare its own financial statements, including footnote disclosures. The “SAS 115” letter is usually issued when any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses would have been discussed with management during the audit, but are not required to be communicated in written form. In performing an audit of your Plan’s internal controls and plan financials, your auditors are required to obtain an understanding of the Plan’s operations and internal controls.

A management representation letter is a form letter written by a company’s external auditors, which is signed by senior company management. The letter attests to the accuracy of the financial statements that the company has submitted to the auditors for their analysis. The CEO and the most senior accounting person (such as the CFO) are usually required to sign the letter. The letter is signed following the completion of audit fieldwork, and before the financial statements are issued along with the auditor’s opinion. External auditors follow a set of standards different from that of the company or organization hiring them to do the work.

In doing so, they may become aware of matters related to your Plan’s internal control that may be considered deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. Audits performed by outside parties can be extremely helpful in removing any bias in reviewing the state of a company’s financials. Financial audits seek to identify if there are any material misstatements in the financial statements. An unqualified, or clean, auditor’s opinion provides financial statement users with confidence that the financials are both accurate and complete. External audits, therefore, allow stakeholders to make better, more informed decisions related to the company being audited.

The representation should reaffirm your client’s understanding of all significant terms in the engagement letter. A relevant assertion is a financial statement assertion that has a reasonable possibility of containing a misstatement or misstatements that would cause the financial statements to be materially misstated.

The purpose of an internal audit is to ensure compliance with laws and regulations and to help maintain accurate and timely financial reporting and data collection. It also provides a benefit to management by identifying flaws in internal control or financial reporting prior to its review by external auditors.

Depending on materiality and other qualitative factors, the auditors will consider the deficiency to be an “other” matter, significant deficiency, or material weakness. The auditor has discretion on which category the deficiency falls into, but are otherwise required to use the standard wording and definitions in the letter.

It serves to document management’s representations during the audit, reducing misunderstandings of management’s responsibilities for the financial statements. The definition of good internal controls is that they allow errors and other misstatements to be prevented or detected and corrected by (the nonprofit’s) employees in the normal course of performing their duties.

Material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified during the audit, and auditors are required to disclose this in their written communication. The auditor’s report contains the auditor’s opinion on whether a company’s financial statements comply with accounting standards. The results of the internal audit are used to make managerial changes and improvements to internal controls.

What is a management representation letter?

A management representation letter is a form letter written by a company’s external auditors, which is signed by senior company management. The letter attests to the accuracy of the financial statements that the company has submitted to the auditors for their analysis.

A control objective provides a specific target against which to evaluate the effectiveness of controls. Management representation is a letter issued by a client to the auditor in writing as part of audit evidences. The representations letter must cover all periods encompassed by the audit report, and must be dated the same date of audit work completion.

These types of auditors are used when an organization doesn’t have the in-house resources to audit certain parts of their own operations. The assertion of completeness is an assertion that the financial statements are thorough and include every item that should be included in the statement for a given accounting period. The assertion of completeness also states that a company’s entire inventory, even inventory that may be temporarily in the possession of a third party, is included in the total inventory figure appearing on a financial statement. The compilation standards do not require practitioners to obtain a management representation letter, but this does not mean that it’s not a prudent thing to do. Obtaining a representation letter helps to ensure your client understands the services that you have provided, the limitations on the work you have completed, and that they are ultimately responsible for their financial statements.

The biggest difference between an internal and external audit is the concept of independence of the external auditor. When audits are performed by third parties, the resulting auditor’s opinion expressed on items being audited (a company’s financials, internal controls, or a system) can be candid and honest without it affecting daily work relationships within the company. Auditors evaluate each internal control deficiency noted during the audit to determine whether the deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, is severe enough to be considered a material weakness or significant deficiency. In assessing the deficiency, auditors consider the magnitude of potential misstatements of your financial statements as well as the likelihood that internal controls would not prevent or detect and correct the misstatements.

Representation to Management

• In an audit of financial statements, professional standards require that auditors obtain an understanding of internal controls to the extent necessary to plan the audit.
• written confirmation from management to the auditor about the fairness of various financial statement elements.
• Auditors use this understanding of internal controls to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements and to design appropriate audit procedures to minimize that risk.

The idea behind a management representation letter is to take away some of the legal burdens of delivering wrong financial statements from the auditor to the company. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Internal auditors are employed by the company or organization for whom they are performing an audit, and the resulting audit report is given directly to management and the board of directors. Consultant auditors, while not employed internally, use the standards of the company they are auditing as opposed to a separate set of standards.

If the auditors detect an unexpected material misstatement during your audit, it could indicate that your internal controls are not functioning properly. Conversely, lack of an actual misstatement doesn’t necessarily mean that your internal controls are working.

The determination of whether an assertion is a relevant assertion is based on inherent risk, without regard to the effect of controls. Financial statements and related disclosures refers to a company’s financial statements and notes to the financial statements as presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). References to financial statements and related disclosures do not extend to the preparation of management’s discussion and analysis or other similar financial information presented outside a company’s GAAP-basis financial statements and notes.

External audits can include a review of both financial statements and a company’s internal controls. When a company’s financial statements are audited, the principal element an auditor reviews is the reliability of the financial statement assertions. In the United States, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) establishes the accounting standards that companies must follow when preparing their financial statements.

In an audit of financial statements, professional standards require that auditors obtain an understanding of internal controls to the extent necessary to plan the audit. Auditors use this understanding of internal controls to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements and to design appropriate audit procedures to minimize that risk. written confirmation from management to the auditor about the fairness of various financial statement elements. The purpose of the letter is to emphasize that the financial statements are management’s representations, and thus management has the primary responsibility for their accuracy.

Expert Social Media Tips to Help Your Small Business Succeed

This letter is useful for setting the expectations of both parties to the arrangement. Almost all companies receive a yearly audit of their financial statements, such as the income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement. Lenders often require the results of an external audit annually as part of their debt covenants. For some companies, audits are a legal requirement due to the compelling incentives to intentionally misstate financial information in an attempt to commit fraud.

Management representation letter

As long as there’s a reasonable possibility for material misstatement of account balances or financial statement disclosures, your internal controls are considered to be deficient. An auditor typically will not issue an opinion on a company’s financial statements without first receiving a signed management representation letter. An audit engagement is an arrangement that an auditor has with a client to perform an audit of the client’s accounting records and financial statements. The term usually applies to the contractual arrangement between the two parties, rather than the full set of auditing tasks that the auditor will perform. To create an engagement, the two parties meet to discuss the services needed by the client.

As a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002, publicly traded companies must also receive an evaluation of the effectiveness of their internal controls. As noted above, an internal control letter is usually the result of a deficiency in internal controls discovered during the audit, most commonly from a material audit adjustment. The letter includes required language regarding the severity of the deficiency.

Real Business Owners,

The parties then agree on the services to be provided, along with a price and the period during which the audit will be conducted. This information is stated in an engagement letter, which is prepared by the auditor and sent to the client. If the client agrees with the terms of the letter, a person authorized to do so signs the letter and returns a copy to the auditor. By doing so, the parties indicate that an audit engagement has been initiated.

Also, the letter provides supplementary audit evidence of an internal nature by giving formal management replies to auditor questions regarding matters that did not come to the auditor’s attention in performing audit procedures. Some auditors request written representations of all financial statement items. All auditors require representations regarding receivables, inventories, plant and equipment, liabilities, and subsequent events. The letter is required at the completion of the audit fieldwork and prior to issuance of the financial statements with the auditor’s opinion.

Auditors spend a lot of time assessing how material audit adjustments and immaterial adjustments that have the potential to be material will be communicated in the internal control letter. The Representation Letter is issued with the draft audit and is required by auditing standards to finalize the audit. The Representation Letter is a letter from the Association to our firm confirming responsibilities of the board and management for the financial statements, as well as confirming information provided to us during the audit. The President or Treasurer and Management need to sign the Representation Letter and return it back to our office within 60 days from the date the draft audit was issued. Representation Letters received after the 60-day mark may result in additional auditing procedures in order to finalize the audit and comply with auditing standards at an additional expense to the Association.

The Role of Management Representation Letters in Audits

Explore the significance of management representation letters in audits, their preparation process, and common misunderstandings in this insightful overview.

Audits are a critical component of financial transparency and corporate governance. Within this process, management representation letters play an essential role that often goes unnoticed by those outside the accounting profession.

These documents serve as a written assertion from company management regarding the accuracy and completeness of information provided to auditors. Their importance cannot be overstated, as they underpin the trust and integrity of the entire audit process.

Purpose of Management Representation Letters

Management representation letters serve as a formal attestation from a company’s executives to the auditors, confirming the veracity of the financial statements and disclosures. These letters are a professional necessity, providing auditors with assurances that all relevant information has been disclosed. They are a testament to the management’s confidence in their financial reporting and their commitment to transparency.

The letters also support the auditor’s assessment of the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements. By obtaining written confirmations, auditors can reduce the extent of substantive testing required, which can streamline the audit process. This efficiency is beneficial for both the auditors and the company being audited, as it can lead to a more focused and timely audit.

Moreover, these letters can be a safeguard against potential disputes or legal issues that may arise post-audit. In instances where inaccuracies are discovered after the audit has been completed, the letter serves as a record that management had affirmed the completeness and accuracy of the information at the time of the audit. This can be particularly important in cases where financial statements are later found to be fraudulent or misleading.

Preparing a Management Representation Letter

The preparation of a management representation letter is a meticulous process that requires careful attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the company’s financial affairs. It is a collaborative effort between management and auditors to ensure that all significant information is accurately reflected.

Necessary Statements Identification

Identifying the necessary statements to be included in the management representation letter is a foundational step. These statements typically cover a range of areas such as the acknowledgment of responsibility for the fair presentation of financial statements in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework, confirmation of the completeness of the information provided, and the disclosure of any subsequent events that may affect the financial statements. Management must also confirm that they have made the auditors aware of all known instances of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the company. The identification process is guided by professional auditing standards, such as those issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) or the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB).

Information Completeness

Ensuring the completeness of information in the management representation letter is paramount. This involves a thorough review of the company’s financial records and disclosures to verify that all relevant information has been included. Management must confirm that all transactions have been recorded and are reflected in the financial statements. They must also attest to the appropriateness of the accounting policies applied and whether any unrecorded liabilities exist. This step is critical as it directly impacts the credibility of the financial statements and the audit’s outcome. The completeness of information also extends to the disclosure of any related party transactions and the effects of any uncorrected misstatements identified during the audit.

Review and Approval

The final step in preparing a management representation letter is the review and approval by the company’s top executives, typically the CEO and CFO. This review process is not merely a formality; it is an active examination to ensure that the letter accurately reflects the company’s financial position and that all statements can be substantiated. The approval signifies that management has taken ownership of the representations made within the letter. It is also an opportunity for management to discuss any concerns or clarifications with the auditors before the letter is finalized. The signed letter is then dated as of the last day of fieldwork, signifying that the representations are relevant and up-to-date with the findings of the audit.

Misconceptions About Representation Letters

A common misunderstanding about management representation letters is that they are a mere formality, a routine sign-off without substantial impact on the audit’s outcome. This view underestimates the letter’s function as a document that auditors rely upon for assurance beyond the financial data and records they examine. It is not simply a procedural step, but a declaration that can have legal implications for the signatories, particularly if it is later found that the information provided was knowingly false or misleading.

Another misconception is that the letter is solely for the benefit of the auditors. While it is true that auditors use these letters to corroborate information and reduce audit risk, the benefits extend to the management and the company as well. The process of preparing the letter encourages a comprehensive review of the company’s financial disclosures, which can lead to the identification and rectification of errors before the audit is finalized. This proactive approach can enhance the quality of financial reporting and potentially prevent future financial discrepancies.

There is also a belief that once the letter is signed and the audit is complete, the responsibilities of management in relation to the representations made are concluded. However, the representations have a lasting effect, as they are a testament to the financial condition of the company at the point of the audit. Should any issues arise from the period covered by the audit, the representations made can be scrutinized for their accuracy and completeness.

How External Users Leverage Accounting Information

Strengthening your control environment for financial integrity, you may also be interested in..., understanding the implications of a disclaimer of opinion in auditing, balancing fraud prevention with efficient workflows, safeguarding checks with 'for deposit only' endorsements, application controls for robust financial management.

What is a Management Representation Letter?

Share This...

Management representation letter.

A Management Representation Letter is a document written by the management of a company and provided to its auditors. This letter is part of the audit process and it’s typically required at the end of an audit engagement.

The purpose of a Management Representation Letter is to confirm the accuracy and completeness of the information that management has provided to the auditors. It’s a formal acknowledgement that the financial statements and other related information are true, complete, and correctly presented to the best of the management’s knowledge.

The letter covers various items including:

• Assertions : Management confirms that all financial records , data, and other relevant information have been made available to the auditor and are complete and accurate.
• Fraud and Irregularities : Management confirms that they have disclosed any known frauds or suspected frauds affecting the company, as well as any allegations of fraud or suspected fraud.
• Laws and Regulations : Management asserts that the company has complied with all laws and regulations that could have a significant effect on the financial statements .
• Subsequent Events : Management provides information on any events after the balance sheet date that may need to be disclosed in the financial statements or notes.
• Unrecorded Liabilities : Management asserts that there are no material liabilities, contingent or otherwise, that are not disclosed in the financial statements .

The Management Representation Letter helps the auditor obtain written confirmation of representations from management, which can be crucial when forming an audit opinion . It’s worth noting that while this letter is important, it does not relieve the auditor of the responsibility to gather sufficient appropriate audit evidence to form an audit opinion.

Example of a Management Representation Letter

Here is an illustrative example of what a Management Representation Letter might look like. Please note that actual letters would be more detailed and would vary depending on the specifics of the company and the audit.

[Company Letterhead]

[Auditor’s Name and Address]

Dear [Auditor’s Name],

In connection with your audit of the financial statements of [Company’s Name] as of [Financial Year End Date], and for the year then ended, we confirm, to the best of our knowledge and belief, the following representations:

• We have made available to you all financial records and related data, as well as all minutes of meetings of shareholders and the board of directors and its committees.
• We believe that the effects of uncorrected financial statement misstatements aggregated by you during the audit are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements as a whole.
• There have been no irregularities involving management or employees who have significant roles in internal control or that could have a material effect on the financial statements .
• We have complied with all aspects of contractual agreements that could have a material effect on the financial statements in the event of noncompliance.
• There have been no events subsequent to the balance sheet date that would require adjustment to, or disclosure in, the financial statements .

We acknowledge our responsibility to design, implement, and maintain internal control to prevent and detect fraud .

Yours sincerely,

[Chief Executive Officer]

[Chief Financial Officer]

Again, this is just a basic example. A real Management Representation Letter would be tailored to the specific situation and would cover all areas that are relevant to the audit.

Other Posts You'll Like...

Most Common Errors When Preparing Consolidated Financial Statements

How are Joint Ventures Treated in Consolidated Financial Statements?

How to Treat Foreign Subsidiaries in Consolidated Financial Statements?

How Is Goodwill Treated in a Business Combination?

Equity Method vs Acquisition Method in Business Combinations

REG CPA Practice Questions Explained: How to Deduct Charitable Contributions

Helpful links.

• Learn to Study "Strategically"
• How to Pass a Failed CPA Exam
• Samples of SFCPA Study Tools
• SuperfastCPA Podcast

Helicopter Pilot to CPA: How Chase Passed His CPA Exams

How Josh Passed His CPA Exams Using Shorter Study Sessions

The Changes That Helped Marc Pass His CPA Exams After Failing 6 Times

The CPA Study Tweaks Gabi Used to Pass Her CPA Exams

How Skylar Went From a Psychology Major to Becoming a CPA

How Dalton Is Passing Exams by Making His CPA Study a Lifestyle

Want to pass as fast as possible, ( and avoid failing sections ), watch one of our free "study hacks" trainings for a free walkthrough of the superfastcpa study methods that have helped so many candidates pass their sections faster and avoid failing scores....

Make Your Study Process Easier and more effective with SuperfastCPA

Take Your CPA Exams with Confidence

• Free "Study Hacks" Training
• SuperfastCPA PRO Course
• SuperfastCPA Review Notes
• SuperfastCPA Audio Notes
• SuperfastCPA Quizzes

Get Started

• Free "Study Hacks Training"
• Read Reviews of SuperfastCPA
• Busy Candidate's Guide to Passing
• Subscribe to the Podcast
• Purchase Now
• Nate's Story
• Interviews with SFCPA Customers
• Our Study Methods
• SuperfastCPA Reviews
• CPA Score Release Dates
• The "Best" CPA Review Course
• Do You Really Need the CPA License?
• 7 Habits of Successful Candidates
• "Deep Work" & CPA Study

What is a Representation Letter?

A representation letter is a written statement provided by a company’s management to its auditors as part of the audit process. The representation letter confirms that the information provided to the auditors is complete, accurate, and fairly presented in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework. The letter also confirms that the management has disclosed to the auditors all relevant information that may be necessary for the auditors to properly understand the company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The representation letter helps to ensure that the auditors have all the necessary information to conduct an audit in accordance with professional standards.

Why is a Representation Letter Required?

The purpose of the representation letter is to provide the auditor with assurance that the financial statements accurately reflect the company’s financial position and performance. The letter also helps the auditor to identify any potential areas of concern or risk that may need to be addressed during the audit process.

Contents of a Representation Letter

A representation letter typically includes the following:

• A statement that the financial statements being audited are complete and accurate
• A statement that the financial statements are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or international financial reporting standards (IFRS)
• A statement that the company’s management team is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements
• A statement that the company’s management team has made all necessary disclosures in the financial statements
• A statement that the company’s management team has disclosed all material transactions and events that have occurred during the period being audited
• A statement that the company’s management team has disclosed all material off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, and obligations
• A statement that the company’s management team has disclosed all material changes in accounting principles that have occurred during the period being audited
• A statement that the company’s management team has disclosed all material related-party transactions that have occurred during the period being audited
• A statement that the company’s management team has disclosed all material contingencies and commitments that have occurred during the period being audited

The representation letter may also include other representations, such as a representation that the company has complied with all relevant laws and regulations, and that there are no pending legal proceedings that could have a material impact on the financial statements.

Importance of the Representation Letter

The representation letter is an important part of the audit process, as it provides the auditor with assurance that the financial statements are accurate and complete. This helps the auditor to form an opinion on the financial statements and to issue an audit report stating whether the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects.

Without a representation letter, the auditor may not be able to complete the audit, as they may not have sufficient evidence to form an opinion on the financial statements. This could lead to delays or other issues in the audit process, and may impact the company’s ability to obtain financing or meet other regulatory requirements.

In summary, a representation letter is a written statement signed by the company’s management that confirms the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements. It is an important part of the audit process, as it helps the auditor to form an opinion on the financial statements and to issue an audit report.

Amy is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA), having worked in the accounting industry for 14 years. She is a seasoned finance executive having held various positions both in public accounting and most recently as the Chief Financial Officer of a large manufacturing company based out of Michigan.

Related Posts

Journal entries for deferred tax assets and liabilities, what is an income tax provision, journal entries for withholding tax, capitalization of shareholder loans to equity, capitalization of retained earnings to paid-up capital, journal entries for dividends (declaration and payment).

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

• Owner’s Profile
• Homeowner’s Association
• Reserve Study Services
• Individuals
• New! Associations & Taxes
• Treasurer’s Handbook
• The Condo Book

Understanding the Representation Letter

Written by David T. Schwindt, CPA

What is a Representation Letter? As a Board member or manager of a community management company, you may be asked to sign a representation letter at the conclusion of an audit or a reviewed financial statement engagement.  Although the letter is from the Association/management company to the CPA, the CPA will generally draft the letter on behalf of the Association.   The letter includes certain assertions about the Association during the period covered by the financial statements.  Those assertions include but are not limited to the following:

• The Association/management company has provided the CPA with all requested financial information.
• The Association/management company has disclosed all related party transactions.
• The Association/management company has disclosed all existing and potential litigation.
• The Association/management company has disclosed any knowledge of fraud or financial irregularities.
• The Association takes responsibility for the design and implementation of a system of internal controls.  These controls include but are not limited to safeguarding assets, approving transactions and minimizing the risk of someone perpetrating a theft of money or information and not being discovered in a reasonable amount of time. Although the Board is ultimately responsible for this activity, it is common that Boards rely upon the management company to assist in this responsibility.

In some instances, the management company may sign a different representation letter because the responsibilities are slightly different.

Why is the Representation Letter necessary? The American Institute of Certified Public Accounts has determined that those charged with governance (the board of directors and the community management company) should take responsibility for the assertions in the representation letter.  CPAs are mandated to obtain the signed representation letter before issuing the final financial statements.

Who should sign the representation letter? Most often, the Board Chair, Board Treasurer and community manager signs the letter.

When does the Representation Letter need to be signed? The letter needs to be signed at the end of the engagement generally after a draft of the financial statements are issued.  Schwindt & Co combines the representation letter with the management letter comments and proposed adjusting journal entries for ease of review.  When the signed document is received by our office, we are then able to issue the final financial statements.

Should a new Board member or community manager who was not involved with Association management or governance during the period under audit or review be hesitant about signing the representation letter? This is a common question and the answer is simple.  No!  The first paragraph of the representation states that whoever signs the letter does so based on the best knowledge and belief of the person signing.  This means that even though you may be new to the Board or management company, it is perfectly fine to sign the letter because you will only be asserting to issues that you have knowledge.  It is very common for Board members/managers to sign a representation letter even though they were not involved during the period being audited or reviewed.

• Representation letters are normal and required before the issuance of audited/reviewed financial statements.
• Board members are only asserting to issues that they are aware of and new board members and managers frequently are required to sign representation letters.
• The Board Chair, Board Treasurer and community manager are generally required to sign the representation letter.

Questions regarding this article may be directed to David T. Schwindt, CPA at Schwindt & Co. (503) 227-1165.

12300 SE Mallard Way, Suite 275 Milwaukie, OR 97222 (503) 227-1165

OFFICE HOURS

Monday-Thursday, 9 am – 3 pm Friday, By Appointment Only

Copyright 2017-2024 Schwindt & Co. | All Rights Reserved

What is the management representation letter?

Introduction.

External auditors have the responsibility of writing a form letter which is more formally known as the management representation letter. This management representation letter is supposed to be signed by the senior management of the organization.

The accuracy of the financial statements is crucial when it comes to management representation letter because these are the statements that the audit firm submitted to the auditors for analysis.

The senior management team of the company – most likely the CEO or the CFO- has the responsibility of signing this letter and moving ahead with the process.

As soon as the audit work is completed, the process is then followed by the official signing of the management representation letter. The signing of the letter takes place before the issuance of financial statements along with the auditor’s final opinion on the whole audit process.

So what does a management representation letter comprises? To start with, the letter is supposed to state that all the information submitted is completely accurate and there have been no errors in its collection.

It also states the disclosure of all material information to the auditors involved in the project. Audit evidence is the sole purpose in the organization of such a letter so the auditors have a written record of it.

In some cases, the financial statements of the audit do not represent the financial results, so the letter has the chance to take off some blame from the auditors and shift it to lacking on the part of management. Financial position or the cash flows might also not be represented fairly – in which case, the management representation letter comes to rescue.

For these reasons, the letter is crucial as some broad-ranging statements are included by the auditor. The letter is supposed to highlight all the failings or mishaps on the part of the management that can lead to any inaccuracy or small errors in the financial statements.

Following we will discuss all the possible features that can be included in the management representation letter and how to make a successful letter that accomplishes all the purposes.

First of all, the management letter – by following the applicable accounting framework is supposed to list the financial statements in a professional and properly presented manner.

The letter is also supposed to highlight and give a written record of the fact that the financial records are accessible to the auditors working on a project. Furthermore, the letter is supposed to mention that all the minutes associated with the board of directors are finished and finalized.

It is supposed to mention that the management has taken responsibility for making all letters accessible from the regulatory agencies. The management representation letter is supposed to ensure that there are no unrecorded transactions and that every transaction is completely and accurately recorded.

The letter is also supposed to highlight that any net effect of misstatements that were not corrected would be considered immaterial by the authorities.

The system of all financial controls is entirely taken care of by the management team and it’s the responsibility of the management to ensure it runs smoothly without any errors. Disclosure of all party related transactions is also mentioned in the management representation letter and these transactions must be accurately disclosed.

Disclosure of contingent liabilities is also mandatory and it’s mentioned in the management representation letter. Along with the above-mentioned requirements, the disclosure of any claims or assessments that were not asserted is also mentioned in the letter.

The management representation letter also mentions any contingent liabilities and its disclosure is also necessary to be mentioned in the letter.

The recording of any material transactions is also mentioned in the management representation letter and it’s necessary to mention that all these transactions were properly recorded.

Encumbrances and liens on the assets and its proper disclosure should also be mentioned. The systems which are designed to prevent and detect even the slightest trace of any fraud or mishap are the responsibility of the management and all of this should be mentioned in the management representation letter.

The letter should also mention that in case there is any fraud in the audit – the management would not be entirely responsible for it and its outcome. The financial statements and how they conform to the accounting framework can also be a part of the management representation letter.

In typical situations, auditors do not allow the management to make any suggestions or any possible changes to the content of the management representation letter.

Related Posts

How to prepare an internal audit program tips and guidance, review engagement (limited assurance): definition and example, 5 types of due diligence services, benefits, and limitations, what is internal audit department (responsibilities and more).

03 Apr What are Management Representation Letters?

In the world of assurance engagements, a management representation letter is a formal document that represents management’s agreement with the financial statements that are being audited or reviewed. This letter is a critical part of the assurance engagement process and is required by the auditor or reviewer as evidence that management acknowledges and accepts responsibility for the financial statements.

A management representation letter is typically issued by senior management, such as the CEO or CFO, and is addressed to the CPA firm performing the audit or review. It contains a series of statements that confirm certain facts and assurances about the company’s financial information, including the completeness and accuracy of financial records, disclosures of relevant information, and adherence to accounting principles.

The letter serves several purposes, including:

• Confirming the accuracy of financial information : The management representation letter is used to confirm that the financial statements are accurate and complete. This helps provide assurance to stakeholders that the financial statements are reliable.
• Demonstrating management’s responsibility : By signing the letter, management acknowledges its responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements. This helps to provide accountability and transparency to stakeholders.
• Providing evidence for auditors and reviewer s: The management representation letter provides evidence to the CPA firm that management has taken responsibility for the financial statements, which helps to support the audit opinion or review conclusion.
• Reducing the risk of misstatements : The letter helps to reduce the risk of misstatements by requiring management to review the financial statements and provide assurance that they are accurate and complete.

Overall, the management representation letter is a critical part of the assurance engagement process, as it helps to provide assurance that the financial statements are accurate and complete, and that management takes responsibility for them. Without this letter, CPA firms would not have the necessary evidence to support their opinions and conclusions, which could lead to a lack of confidence in the financial statements and potential legal and financial consequences for the company. In fact, CPA firms are not permitted to complete their engagement and issue an audit or review engagement report until management provides a signed management representation letter.

If you require an audit or review and would like to speak to someone about these processes, please contact us to set up a free consultation.

Jennifer Scott

Cpa, cga – senior manager.

Jennifer Scott, a Senior Manager at Clearline brings a wealth of expertise in Private Enterprise and Assurance, holding designations as a CPA and CGA. Jennifer’s focus at Clearline includes conducting reviews, compilations, and providing tax services tailored to owner-manager businesses and partnerships, with a keen interest in industries such as professionals, manufacturing, real estate, and services. Her commitment to exceptional client service is evident through her proactive approach to staying updated on evolving accounting standards and tax legislation, thereby making her clients’ lives easier Jennifer’s educational background includes a Bachelor of Commerce from UBC with a major in Accounting, followed by over 15 years of experience in public practice, specializing in private enterprise. She appreciates the supportive environment at Clearline and enjoys various activities outside of work, including travelling, cheering on her children in sports like soccer, baseball, and volleyball, indulging in long walks with her dog while listening to podcasts, spending quality time with loved ones, and exploring her passion for baking through experimenting with new recipes.

Charmaine Pirrie

Cpa, ca(sa) – senior manager.

Charmaine Pirrie, a Senior Manager at Clearline is a CPA and CA (SA) with a background in audit and review engagements. With experience from Grant Thornton and D&Co, she brings expertise in private company audits and values Clearline’s supportive environment and technical resources. Charmaine also finds fulfillment in delving into her clients’ businesses to provide tailored services, ensuring meticulous audit and review procedures. Outside of work, she enjoys spending time with family, going for walks, and swimming.

Deepeka Dhillon

Cpa – manager.

Deepeka Dhillon, a Manager at Clearline, holds a CPA designation with a focus in Private Enterprise and Tax. Her primary responsibilities include compliance, corporate restructuring, and, estate and succession planning. Deepeka’s passion lies in continuous learning, enabling her to provide tailored solutions to clients’ unique needs. With a CPA designation and completion of the CPA in-depth tax program, she brings a strong educational background to her role at Clearline. Deepeka values the countless opportunities at Clearline to expand her knowledge in the complex world of tax. Outside work, she enjoys spending time with her beloved Jack Russell Terrier, Opie.

Raj Momrath

Cpa, ca, senior tax manager.

Raj Momrath, a Senior Tax Manager at Clearline, is a CPA, CA specializing in Canadian Tax. With a focus on Canadian tax planning, corporate reorganizations, estate planning, and providing business advice, Raj caters to a diverse clientele, including small owner-manager companies, high-net-worth individuals and large privately held multinational firms. His passion lies in helping Canadian owner-manager businesses and their shareholders minimize their overall tax obligations while navigating disputes with the Canada Revenue Agency and ensuring compliance with the complex Canadian tax system. Raj’s professional journey includes prior experience in PwC’s tax group, where he obtained his Chartered Accountant designation and then some time at some mid-sized firms. Raj completed the CPA Canada InDepth Tax course in 2017 strengthening his knowledge of Canadian tax. At Clearline, Raj appreciates working alongside knowledgeable colleagues and enjoys spending quality time with his wife and two sons and attending and volunteering with their sports activities. In his leisure time, Raj indulges in barbequing, golfing, and spending time outdoors, finding relaxation and enjoyment in these pursuits.

Julia Wallis

Julia Wallis, a Senior Manager at Clearline, holds designations as a CPA, CGA, and also holds a BA. Working within the Private Enterprise Group, her primary focus revolves around assisting entrepreneurs in understanding their personal and business finances while ensuring compliance with tax reporting requirements. Julia finds fulfillment in learning about her clients’ businesses and providing financial insights to enhance their management effectiveness while optimizing tax strategies. With a diverse career spanning various companies and public practice roles, including as a controller, Julia’s progression has equipped her with invaluable skills and insights into different business operations. She chose Clearline for its respected partners and staff, aligned philosophy on client service, and flexibility to balance demanding tax filing periods with leisure time for travel and personal interests such as gardening, wine exploration, reading, and relaxation.

Annelie Vistica

Cpa, ca – principal.

Annelie Vistica, a Principal at Clearline, is a CPA and CA with a strong background in private enterprise and assurance. With a Bachelor of Accountancy from the University of Stellenbosch in South Africa and extensive experience in tax, Annelie brings expertise in business setup, growth planning, and estate transitioning. She is passionate about engaging with clients to support them through various business stages, from inception to succession planning. Annelie values the supportive environment at Clearline, where she appreciates colleagues’ assistance in tax and assurance. Outside work, she enjoys spending time with her family and dog, exploring nature, visiting family in the Okanagan, and travelling the world.

Bilal Kathrada

Cpa, ca, principal.

Bilal, a Principal at Clearline Chartered Professional Accountants, primarily focuses on income tax and succession planning for Canadian owner-managed businesses in various industries. Bilal received his Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Victoria and obtained his CA designation in 2005.

Prior to Clearline, he worked in the tax group of a large international accounting firm in Vancouver and a mid-sized accounting firm located in the Fraser Valley.

Outside of the office, he enjoys spending time with his wife and three children. He enjoys outdoor activities such as golf and spending time with his family and friends.

Danny Sandhu

Cpa, manager.

Bio coming soon.

Shehzel Saif

Cpa, tax manager.

As Clearline’s Tax Manager, Shehzel focuses on tax planning, corporate reorganizations and succession and estate planning. She’s passionate about continuous learning and staying up to date on tax legislation changes and helping clients with succession. In addition to her CPA designation, Shehzel also has a Bachelor of Business Administration and has completed the CPA In-Depth Taxation Program. Outside of work, she enjoys spending time with family and friends, traveling and trying out new recipes.

Ameeta Randhawa

As Clearline’s HR Manager, Ameeta supports our firm’s greatest resource—our staff. With a Bachelor of Business Administration in Human Resources and over 7 years of HR experience in various industries, she ensures all employees have a positive experience at Clearline. Ameeta’s focuses include recruitment, performance management, employee relations, program and policy development, and employee engagement. Outside of work, she enjoys traveling and spending time with friends and family.

CPA, CA, Senior Manager

Michael is a Senior Manager in Private Enterprise, carrying out reviews, compilations, and tax services for small- to medium-sized businesses. With a Bachelor of Commerce specializing in finance and a Diploma in Accounting, backed by over a decade of accounting experience, Michael is a trusted advisor who helps clients’ businesses succeed. Outside of the office, Michael enjoys spending time with family, trying out different restaurants in the city, and building and collecting mechanical keyboards.

CPA, CGA, Manager

Victor K. Yoshida

Victor was born and raised in Vancouver and obtained his Bachelor of Commerce from the University of British Columbia. He articled with Deloitte & Touche and received his CA designation in 1984. Victor was accepted to the firm’s tax group and went on to complete the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants In-Depth Tax course.

Victor specializes in Canadian income tax issues for professional and owner-managed businesses. He has extensive experience with business succession, estate planning, wealth preservation issues, corporate reorganizations, as well as mergers and acquisitions.

Victor was a member of the education committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of British Columbia and has held executive positions with various amateur sport organizations.

In his free time, Victor enjoys training for marathons, travelling, and spending time with his family.

Clarity, strategy and confidence straight to your inbox.

Sign up for Clearline news and insights

• Submit Post
• Union Budget 2024
• CA, CS, CMA

Demystifying ISA 580: Management Representation Letters in Auditing

Introduction: The Basics of Audit – Management Representation Letter (ISA 580)

In the intricate world of auditing, there exists a pivotal document known as the Management Representation Letter, guided by ISA 580. This document plays a central role in audits, acting as a conduit for communication between management and auditors. In this comprehensive exploration, we delve deep into the intricacies of the Management Representation Letter, covering all 19 key points outlined in the standard, from its purpose to the actions auditors must take in the face of challenges.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Understanding the Management Representation Letter

A Management Representation Letter, as stipulated by ISA 580, constitutes a formal statement presented by the management of the audited entity to the auditors. It can be furnished either spontaneously or in response to specific audit inquiries. These representations encompass a wide spectrum of subjects, ranging from general responsibilities related to the preparation of financial statements to specific assertions concerning items within the financial statements.

2. The Role of Management Representation as Audit Evidence

While Management Representation Letters hold undeniable importance, they cannot serve as a complete replacement for other audit evidence that auditors anticipate will be available. For select matters where no alternative evidence exists, such as determining whether investments are held as short-term or long-term, Management Representation can indeed function as sufficient and appropriate audit evidence.

3. Key ISA 580 Requirements

Revised ISA 580 introduces two significant stipulations:

• 3.1. In the event that a representation made by management contradicts other audit evidence, auditors are obligated to investigate the circumstances thoroughly and, if necessary, reassess the reliability of other representations provided by management.
• 3.2. If, during the course of the audit, management refuses to furnish a representation that auditors deem essential, this constitutes a scope limitation. Consequently, auditors are required to express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.

4. Additional Vital Elements of Management Representation

• 4.1. The Management Representation Letter must be addressed directly to the auditor.
• 4.2. Its date should coincide with the date of the auditor’s report or precede it.
• 4.3. It should bear the signature of a member of management who bears primary responsibility for the preparation of financial statements and possesses pertinent knowledge in this regard.

5. Various Forms of Written Representation

Management Representation can assume various formats, including:

• 5.1. A straightforward representation provided by management.
• 5.2. A letter authored by auditors delineating their understanding of management’s representation, an acknowledgment of which is sought and obtained from management.
• 5.3. A duly authenticated copy of pertinent meetings involving the board of directors or analogous bodies.

6. The Effective Date of ISA 580

ISA 580 is effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2009.

7. The Objectives of the Auditor

The objectives of the auditor, as per ISA 580, encompass:

• 7.1. Obtaining written representations from management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, confirming their belief in fulfilling their responsibility for preparing the financial statements and ensuring the completeness of information provided to the auditor.
• 7.2. Supporting other audit evidence relevant to the financial statements or specific assertions in the financial statements through written representations, as determined necessary by the auditor or required by other SAs.
• 7.3. Responding appropriately to written representations provided by management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, or if management or, where appropriate, those charged with governance do not provide the written representations requested by the auditor.

8. Definition of Written Representations

For purposes of the SAs, “Written representations” is defined as a written statement by management provided to the auditor to confirm certain matters or to support other audit evidence. Written representations, in this context, do not include financial statements, the assertions therein, or supporting books and records.

9. References to “Management” in the Standard

For purposes of this SA, references to “management” should be read as “management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance.” In the case of a fair presentation framework, management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework; or the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.

10. Management from Whom Written Representations Requested

The auditor shall request written representations from management with appropriate responsibilities for the financial statements and knowledge of the matters concerned.

11. Written Representations about Management’s Responsibilities for the Preparation of the Financial Statements

The auditor shall request management to provide a written representation that it has fulfilled its responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework, including where relevant their fair presentation, as set out in the terms of the audit engagement.

12. Written Representations about Information Provided and Completeness of Transactions

The auditor shall request management to provide a written representation that:

• 12.1. It has provided the auditor with all relevant information and access as agreed in the terms of the audit engagement.
• 12.2. All transactions have been recorded and are reflected in the financial statements.

13. Description of Management’s Responsibilities in the Written Representations

Management’s responsibilities shall be described in the written representations required by paragraphs 9 and 10 in the manner in which these responsibilities are described in the terms of the audit engagement.

14. Other Written Representations

Other SAs may require the auditor to request written representations. If, in addition to such required representations, the auditor determines that it is necessary to obtain one or more written representations to support other audit evidence relevant to the financial statements or one or more specific assertions in the financial statements, the auditor shall request such other written representations.

15. Date of and Period(s) Covered by Written Representations

The date of the written representations shall be as near as practicable to, but not after, the date of the auditor’s report on the financial statements. The written representations shall be for all financial statements and period(s) referred to in the auditor’s report.

16. Form of Written Representations

The written representations shall be in the form of a representation letter addressed to the auditor. If law or regulation requires management to make written public statements about its responsibilities, and the auditor determines that such statements provide some or all of the representations required by paragraphs 9 or 10, the relevant matters covered by such statements need not be included in the representation letter.

17. Doubt as to the Reliability of Written Representations and Requested Written Representations Not Provided

• 17.1. If the auditor has concerns about the competence, integrity, ethical values, or diligence of management, or about its commitment to or enforcement of these, the auditor shall determine the effect that such concerns may have on the reliability of representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general.
• 17.2. In particular, if written representations are inconsistent with other audit evidence, the auditor shall perform audit procedures to attempt to resolve the matter. If the matter remains unresolved, the auditor shall reconsider the assessment of the competence, integrity, ethical values, or diligence of management, or of its commitment to or enforcement of these, and shall determine the effect that this may have on the reliability of representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general.

18. Requested Written Representations Not Provided

If management does not provide one or more of the requested written representations, the auditor shall:

• 18.1. Discuss the matter with management.
• 18.2. Re-evaluate the integrity of management and evaluate the effect that this may have on the reliability of representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general.
• 18.3. Take appropriate actions, including determining the possible effect on the opinion in the auditor’s report in accordance with SA 705, having regard to the requirement in paragraph 19 of this SA.

19. Written Representations about Management’s Responsibilities

The auditor shall disclaim an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with SA 705 if:

• 19.1. The auditor concludes that there is sufficient doubt about the integrity of management such that the written representations required by paragraphs 9 and 10 are not reliable; or
• 19.2. Management does not provide the written representations required by paragraphs 9 and 10.

Conclusion: Unlocking the Significance of ISA 580

In conclusion, ISA 580, which revolves around the Management Representation Letter, is a comprehensive framework that ensures transparency, accountability, and reliability in the audit process. By covering all 19 points detailed in the standard, auditors can effectively navigate the complexities of this critical document. Understanding the nuances of ISA 580 empowers auditors to fulfill their duties with precision, integrity, and professionalism, ultimately enhancing the quality of financial reporting and instilling confidence in stakeholders.

• Auditing Standards
• « Previous Article
• Next Article »

Name: CA Rahul Sharma

Qualification: ca in job / business, company: uco bank, location: jaipur, rajasthan, india, member since: 01 mar 2021 | total posts: 79, my published posts, join taxguru’s network for latest updates on income tax, gst, company law, corporate laws and other related subjects..

• Join Our whatsApp Channel
• Join Our Telegram Group

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Comment

Notice: It seems you have Javascript disabled in your Browser. In order to submit a comment to this post, please write this code along with your comment: 78592b76d40facc789f4103d4966d5a1

Subscribe to Our Daily Newsletter

Latest posts.

Madras HC Sets Aside Unreasoned Order Imposing GST on Vouchers

Matter restored for AO’s disallowance which was not in terms with section 115JB for fresh verification

ITAT allowed additional depreciation claim of Rs. 49.5 cr notwithstanding Authorities failed to appreciate Amended Provision of S. 36(1) (iia)

HC stays recovery considering single judge order allowing appellant to avail alternate remedy

Madras HC Grants Opportunity to Taxpayer in GSTR 3B & GSTR 2A Discrepancy Case

Representation on deficiency in GST Portal functioning

GST recommends Extension of GSTR-1 due date to 12th April 2024

ITAT upholds disallowance of Expense against rental/Interest income & Partnership Firm Profit Share

Madras HC Sets Aside Order: GSTR 3B & 2A Discrepancy Disputed

Unreceived GST ASMT 10/DRC-01: HC Grants Petitioner Opportunity  

Featured posts.

For Tax Filing – Analyze the Old and New Tax Regime

Auto-populate HSN-wise summary from e-Invoices into Table 12 of GSTR-1

CBDT mandates electronic filing of 8 income tax forms starting April 1, 2024

Advisory on Reset and Re-filing of GSTR-3B of some taxpayers

CBDT Clarifies on Misleading Reports on HRA Claims

Financial Year end GST Checkpoints

Representation on Incorrect/Delay In Submitting Application U/S 12A(1)(ac)

Statutory and Tax Compliance Calendar for April 2024

What is a Representation Letter?

An auditor’s responsibility is to gather audit evidence regarding a subject matter. This evidence comes from several audit procedures. Based on this evidence, the auditor must conclude whether the subject matter meets specific criteria. In the case of external audits , it includes examining a client’s financial statements to establish whether they are free from material misstatements.

In some cases, however, auditors may not have the option to apply some substantive audit procedures . However, that does not imply the auditor must not consider those areas. It also does not infer that auditors must provide a negative opinion regarding those areas. In these cases, auditors can also obtain a representation letter from the client’s management.

A representation letter is a form of written representation obtain from a client. Written representations are audit evidence that auditors collect. Similarly, they are necessary information that auditors may require related to a specific audit assignment. These are similar to audit inquiries but in a written form. The international auditing standard that deals with written representations are ISA 580 Written Representations.

It is a written statement written by auditors. This statement attests to the accuracy of the financial statements given to the auditors for analysis. Auditors present this letter to the client’s management, who signs the letter constructing a form of audit evidence. While this evidence is necessary, it may not represent sufficient appropriate audit evidence.

Once presented to the management, a senior official will sign the representation letter. Usually, a client’s CEO, CFO, or other higher senior accounting personnel sign the letter. This process must take place before auditors present an audit report regarding the client’s financial statements. The content of the representation letter may vary from one firm to another. However, there are some similar elements or contents that are present in every representation letter.

What are the Contents of the Representation Letter?

A typical representation letter will include various areas to cover the auditors’ liability towards the audit assignment. It will also include areas to ensure the management is aware of its responsibility to prepare accurate financial statements. According to accountingtool.com , representation letters will cover the following areas.

1. The management is responsible for the proper presentation and accurate preparation of the financial statements. It will also include a reference to the applicable accounting framework for this purpose. 2. The auditors have received all the financial records related to the audit. 3. The board of directors meeting minutes are complete. 4. There are no unrecorded transactions. 5. The management has disclosed all related party transactions. 6. The management has provided all letters from regulatory agencies regarding financial reporting noncompliance if required. 7. The net effect of all uncorrected misstatements is immaterial. 8. The financial statements conform to the applicable accounting standards. 9. The management doesn’t have any knowledge of fraud within the company. 10. The financial statements account for all material transactions. 11. The management is responsible for systems designed to detect and prevent fraud. 12. The client has disclosed all liens and other encumbrances on its assets. 13. The management has disclosed all contingent liabilities. 14. The management acknowledges its responsibility for the system of financial controls. 15. The client has disclosed all unasserted claims or assessments.

Overall, the representation letter will consist of all the management’s responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit. This letter will decrease the auditors’ responsibility if there is a future dispute. Similarly, it places responsibility on the management for areas where it must ensure proper accounting and controls. Auditors will not allow the management to make changes to the representation letter before signing.

What Happens If Auditors Cannot Obtain Reliable Representation Letters?

In some cases, auditors cannot obtain a reliable representation letter from the management. These may occur when the auditor has concerns about the competence, integrity, or diligence of the management. In these cases, the standards require auditors to determine the effect that such issues may have on the reliability of the representation letters.

When auditors obtain representation letters that are inconsistent with other audit evidence, they must perform procedures to resolve any discrepancies. If they cannot do so, they will need to reconsider the prior assessment of the client’s management. The auditors must also determine the effects such circumstances will have on the reliability of the representation letter or the audit assignment.

If auditors conclude that the representation letter is not reliable, they must take appropriate actions. These may include establishing the possible effect on the opinion in the auditor’s report. The same cases will apply when the management refuses to provide a representation letter. The auditor must discuss it with the management before taking any actions.

Representation letters are a form of written representation and constitute an essential part of audits. These letters attest to the accuracy of the financial statements presented by the client’s management. There are several areas which representation letters cover. If auditors cannot obtain reliable representation letters, they will need to evaluate the situation and take appropriate actions.

Related Posts:

• Reasonable Assurance Engagement: All You Need to Know!
• Limited Assurance Engagement: All You Need to Know!
• Types of Assurance Engagement: All You Need to Know
• Objectives of an Assurance Engagement

Tel: +254 20 2249 100/11  +254 720 021 253 | Email: [email protected]

Management Representation Letters in Governance Audit

A Management Representation Letter, referred to herein as the letter, is a document signed by senior company management and submitted to the company’s external auditors. This letter serves as an affirmation of the accuracy of the financial statements subjected to the auditor’s scrutiny. The significance of this practice is underscored by its incorporation into the International Standards on Auditing (ISA 580), designating the letter and its written representations as audit evidence. This inclusion in professional standards emphasizes the need for Management Representation Letters in audit processes, as audit evidence forms the foundation for the auditor’s opinion.

This governance practice holds a pivotal role in ensuring the quality, integrity, ethical grounding, and diligence of financial statements and management. Its importance extends across various dimensions:

• Drawing inspiration from Saul Alinsky’s insight that controlling language controls the masses, the governance framework becomes a critical tool. Notably, the Enron Inc. scandal serves as a cautionary tale, where falsified financial statements led to a catastrophic decline in share value. Robust governance, including the Management Representation Letter, mitigates such risks.
• In specific jurisdictions, such as the United States under the Sarbanes Oxley Act, the Management Representation Letter is a statutory requirement. This mandates companies to have their executives sign the letter, ensuring compliance with legal obligations.
• Recognizing the absence of jurisprudence in some jurisdictions, professional institutes often incorporate the practice into their codes. Additionally, adherence to international standards such as the International Financial Reporting System (IFRS) and ISA is crucial. For instance, the Institute of Certified Public Accountants (ICPAC) recognizes the importance of ISA.
• The letter serves as a safeguard against managerial denial of wrongdoing or negligence, particularly in cases of incompetent oversight. Reference to Kenneth Lay’s denial in the Enron scandal highlights the necessity of signed letters to counter such potential denials.
• Acknowledging that auditors depend on correct financial statements, the Management Representation Letter reduces management’s influence, strengthening the auditor’s oversight powers.
• The letter establishes accountability for senior managers responsible for the business’s well-being. Signing the letter signifies their individual responsibility for the financial statement’s integrity, completeness, and potential losses resulting from falsified records.
• As pre-audit custodians of financial reports, management holds significant influence over their integrity. The letter commits them to refrain from tampering with the contents or preparation of reports, preventing potential manipulations.
• Providing assurance to auditors, the Management Representation Letter instills confidence in the accuracy of the financial position reviewed. This credibility promotes responsible management practices and underscores the significance of the audit exercise.

The Management Representation Letter transcends being a mere accessory in the audit process; it is a cornerstone of good corporate governance. This letter safeguards against shareholder deception, assuring stakeholders and the public of transparent and above-board operations within a company. It stands as the final safeguard against misinformation, reinforcing the integrity of financial reporting.

Share Article via:

• More Networks

Automated page speed optimizations for fast site performance

CHECKPOINT LEARNING

Checkpoint Learning Message

Checkpoint Learning

Course Detail

What is a Management Representation Letter  

We know that generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) require auditors to obtain written representations from their clients' management team, as part of audits of financial statements and periods covered by the auditors' reports. The specific written representations will depend on the individual engagement circumstances and the nature and basis of the presentation of the financial statements. This overview may be appropriate for professionals at all organizational levels.

Checkpoint Learning is committed to bringing innovative solutions to you, now including nano-learning! As per NASBA Standards, a nano-learning course is a 10-minute, electronic, self-study course in which you are eligible to earn 1/5 (or 0.2) CPE credits.

At this time, nano-learning is not accepted by all state boards. If you are not sure whether your state board accepts nano-learning, you can ask your state board or visit the NASBA registry: (nasbaregistry.org).

Included with subscription(s):

• Premier Plus CPE Package

0.2 Credits

Accreditation Information

• TX Credits : 0.2

Learning objectives

Upon successful completion of this course, the user should be able to:

identify what is contained in a management representation letter.

Course outline

• Introduction
• Changes to AU-C Section 580, Written Representations
• An Example of a Management Representation Letter - Part 1
• An Example of a Management Representation Letter - Part 2

Requirements

Additional Compliance Information

Home » Blog » Illustrative Management Representation Letter (MRL) for Tax Audit

Illustrative Management Representation Letter (MRL) for Tax Audit

• Blog | Account & Audit |
• Last Updated on 20 September, 2023

Recent Posts

News, Blog, Company Law

[Opinion] ROC Penalizes Co. Its Directors for Allotting Securities Without Approval Under ESOP Scheme Before the Vesting Period of One Year

Blog, News, GST & Customs

GSTN Issued Advisory on Reset and Re-Filing of GSTR-3B of Some Taxpayers

Latest from taxmann.

_____________________

Chartered Accountants

Address: ____________

(Date: ______________)

Sub: Representation from Management for the purpose of Tax Audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (The “Act”) for the year ended on 31st March, 20XX.

Respected Sir/ Madam,

This representation letter is provided in connection with the tax audit u/s 44AB of the Income Tax Act of _______________ for the year ended 31st March, 20XX for the purpose of expressing an opinion as to whether the Form 3CD along with the annexure thereto gives a true and correct view of the facts mentioned therein. We acknowledge our responsibility to keep and maintain such books of account and other documents as may enable tax auditor to complete tax audit u/s 44AB, in accordance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961

We confirm the following representations to the best of our knowledge and belief:

1. The name of the assessee as per PAN card is __________. A copy of PAN Card has been attached herewith.

2. The assessee has no other business address than communicated to the Income-tax Department for assessment purposes.

3. The Assessee has employed the cash/mercantile system of accounting during the year.

4. There has been a change in the method of accounting employed in the previous year as compared to that employed in the immediately preceding financial year i.e. F.Y. 20XX-XX. The effect of the same on profit is as follows:

The assessee is liable/not liable to pay indirect taxes & if yes, for that registration number is as follows:

(a) Service Tax: _________________

(b) VAT: _________________

(c) Excise: _________________

(d) Import Export Code: _________________

(e) GST: _________________

Copy of the Registration Certificates (RCs) has been attached herewith.

5. The Assessee has not opted to be assessed under any of the 115BA/115BAA/115BAB/115BAC/115BAD.

6. We confirm that the profit and loss account does not include any profits and gains assessable on a presumptive basis under relevant sections 44AD, 44AE, 44AF, 44B, 44BB, 44BBA, 44BBB or any other relevant section

7. The Assessee is engaged in the business as reported in clause 10(a) of Form 3CD.

8. The Assessee has disclosed the nature of every business carried on by it and there is no change in the nature of business carried in the previous year from the earlier years.

9. The Assessee has maintained books of accounts in the “ERP” based computer system in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principle and the following books are generated by the computer systems:-

(a) Cash Book

(b) Bank Book

(d) Journal

10. The above books and accounts have been maintained and kept as per the addresses mentioned in clause 11(b) of Form 3CD.

11. The following are the members/partners of the firm & their profit-sharing ratio is as follow:

12. There are no items of the following nature which are not credited to the profit and loss account where applicable:

(a) items falling under the scope of Section 28 of the Act;

(b) the performa credits, drawbacks, refund of duty or customs or excise or service-tax or refund due by the authorities concerned;

(c) escalation claims accepted during the previous year;

(d) any other item of income; and

(e) capital receipts.

13. During the Previous Year, the assessee has not transferred any land or building for a consideration less than the value adopted or assessed or assessable by any authority of a State Government referred to in section 43CA or 50C.

14. The Assessee has disclosed ICDS as required by the disclosure norms mentioned as per section 145(2) of the Income Tax Act, along with any adjustment in clause 13(e) of Form 3CD.

15. Adjustments is required to be made to the profits or loss to comply with the provisions of ICDS. The effects of such adjustments are as follow:

16. The Closing stock in respect of Raw Material, Work In Progress, and Finished Goods are valued at cost or Net Realizable Value (NRV) whichever is less. The assessee has changed/not changed its accounting policy regarding the valuation of inventories during the previous year. The change of accounting policy has resulted in an increase/decrease in profit by Rs. ____________ in the previous year 20XX-XX.

17. The particulars disclosed in respect of depreciation allowable as per the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of each asset or block of assets, as the case may be as required under clause 18 of Form No. 3CD are correct.

18. There are no amounts admissible under sections 32AC, 32AD, 33AB, 33ABA, 33AC (wherever applicable), 35(1), 35(2AB), 35ABB, 35AC, 35CCA, 35CCB, 35CCC, 35CCD, 35D, 35DD and 35E which are debited/not debited to the profit and loss account.

19. The Assessee has not paid any sum to an employee as bonus or commission for services rendered, where such sum was otherwise payable to him as profits or dividend.

20. The sums received from employees towards contributions to any provident fund or superannuation fund or any other fund mentioned u/s 2(24) (x) and the due date of payments and the actual date of payments to the concerned authorities u/s 36(1) (va) as disclosed against clause 20(b) of form 3CD are correct.

21. The assessee has not debited any expense being in the nature of Capital Expenditure to Profit and Loss Account.

22. We certify that there are no capital assets which are converted into stock in trade

23. The assessee has not debited any expense being in the nature of Personal Expenditure to Profit and Loss Account.

24. The Assessee had not released any advertisement in any souvenir, brochure, tract, pamphlet or the like, published by any political party.

25. The Assessee had not made any payments to club as entrance fees, subscriptions and for club services and facilities used.

26. The Assessee had not incurred any expenditure by way of penalty or fine for violation of any law and no expenditure was incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law except a sum of Rs. ________ as interest on late deposit of TDS under section 201(1A) and Interest on Income Tax under section 206C(7) which is duly reported in clause 34(c) of Form 3CD.

27. The Assessee had not incurred any expenditure by way of any other penalty or fine.

28. There are no amounts inadmissible u/s 40(a) of the Act except Rs. __________ being the amount paid to a resident on which tax is not deducted. Refer clause 21(b)(ii)(A) of Form 3CD.

29. As certified, in relation to any expenditure covered u/s 40A (3), all payments were made by an account payee Cheque drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft. That all payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 have been made either by an account payee Cheque drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft or by electronic clearing system.

30. The Assessee has paid no sums, which are disallowed u/s 40A (9).

31. The Assessee has not debited any item of a contingent nature to the profit and loss account.

32. The deduction u/s 14A amounting to Rs. ___________ in respect of expenditure incurred in relation to income which does not form part of the total income is correct.

33. The Assessee does not have any amount of interest paid that is inadmissible under the provision to section 36 (1) (iii) of the Act.

34. Particulars of payments made to persons specified under section 40A(2)(b) as mentioned in clause 23 of Form 3CD are correct.

35. There is no amount of profit chargeable to tax u/s 41 of the Act.

36. That during the previous year the assessee has not received any property, being share of a company not being a company in which the public are substantially interested, without consideration or for inadequate consideration as referred to in section 56(2)(viia) except reported under clause 28 of Form 3CD.

37. There are no other income during the previous year that the assessee received by way of consideration for issue of shares which exceeds the fair market value of the shares as referred to in section 56(2)(viib)/(ix)/(x) except for clause 29 of Form 3CD.

38. There are no sums referred to under clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), or (e) of section 43B, the liability for which pre-existed on the first day of the previous year but was not allowed in the assessment of any preceding previous year except those disclosed against clause 26(A) of form 3CD. The amount of expenditure incurred during the previous year, paid on or before filing of return u/s 139(1) is duly reported in clause 26(B)(a) and not paid on or before the aforesaid date under clause 26(B)(b) of Form 3 CD.

39. The amount of Central Value Added Tax Credits/Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed of or utilised during the previous year and its treatment in profit and loss account and treatment of outstanding Central Value Added Tax Credits/Input Tax Credit(ITC) in accounts as per relevant law is duly reported in Form 3CD vide clause No. 27 (a).

40. There is no income or expenditure or prior period credited to the profit and loss account except those shown against clause 27 (b) of 3CD.

41. As certified, it is the practice of the Assessee to accept any loan or deposit or any sum and to make any repayment of loan or deposit or any sum in excess of Rs. 20,000 by account payee cheque or account payee bank draft or by electronic clearing system only.

42. There are no amounts/deductions admissible under Chapter VI-A or Chapter III (section 10A, section 10AA) under Clause 33 of Form No. 3CD except disclosed in Form 3CD.

43. That the assessee has complied with all the provisions of Chapter XVII-B or Chapter XVII-BB of the Act and deduction or collection of tax at source has been made at the applicable rates under the relevant provisions of the Act. There have been no cases of tax-deductible where tax has not been deducted at all, or shortfalls on account of lesser deduction than required to be deducted or tax deducted or tax deducted late or tax deducted but not paid to the credit of the Central Government in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII-B or Chapter XVII-BB of the Act, except as disclosed in clause 34(a) of Form 3CD.

44. The Assessee has furnished the statement of tax deducted and collected within the prescribed time except as disclosed in clause 34(b) of Form 3CD.

45. The interest under section 201(1A) or section 206C (7) disclosed under clause 34(c) of Form 3CD is correct.

46. There are no other quantitative details of any other item that an entity principally traded or manufactured other than disclosed under clause 35.

47. That assessee has not received any amount in the nature of dividend as referred to in sub-clause (e) of clause (22) of section 2 except as disclosed under clause 36A of Form 3CD.

48. During the previous year there was no audit conducted under the Central Excise Act 1944 and under section 72A of the Finance Act, 1994.

49. There was no adverse comment raised and reported by the cost auditor of the assessee during the previous year.

50. There is no demand raised or refund issued during the previous year under any tax laws other than the Income Tax Act,1961 and Wealth Tax Act, 1957 except as disclosed in clause 41 of Form 3CD.

51. The detail regarding turnover, gross profit etc. for the previous year and preceding previous year are correctly calculated and disclosed in clause 40 of Form 3CD.

52. The Assessee has complied the requirement of furnishing the statements in Form 61 or Form No. 61A or Form No. 61B

53. The Assessee has complied the requirement to furnish statement as prescribed under sub-section (2) of section 286.

54. There is no other expenditure of entities registered or not registered under the GST as disclosed in clause 44 of Form 3CD.

For and on behalf of

(Director Finance)

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

• The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
• All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
• Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
• Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
• All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
• The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
• Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

PREVIOUS POST

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Latest books.

R.K. Jain's Customs Tariff of India | Set of 2 Volumes

R.K. Jain's Customs Law Manual | 2023-24 | Set of 2 Volumes

R.K. Jain's GST Law Manual | 2023-24

R.K. Jain's GST Tariff of India | 2023-24

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

Author: Taxmann

• Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

Everything you need on Tax & Corporate Laws. Authentic Databases, Books, Journals, Practice Modules, Exam Platforms, and More.

• Express Delivery | Secured Payment
• Free Shipping in India on order(s) above ₹500
• Missed call number +91 8688939939
• Virtual Books & Journals
• About Company
• Media Coverage
• Budget 2022-23
• Business & Support
• Sell with Taxmann
• Locate Dealers
• Locate Representatives
• CD Key Activation
• Privacy Policy
• Return Policy
• Payment Terms