literature review on marketing concept

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, the use of marketing concepts in library services: a literature review.

Library Review

ISSN : 0024-2535

Article publication date: 5 July 2013

Marketing supports the reaching of organizational goals by focusing on the identification and satisfaction of customer needs, thus it can also contribute considerably in achieving the objectives of non‐profit organizations such as libraries. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the literature on the incorporation of marketing notions and the implementation of marketing techniques in library management. It reviews definitions, present different opposing views, marketing issues, social media and Web 2.0 and opinions on the adoption of marketing in a non‐profit organization environment, and examines different successful examples of marketing implementation, concentrating on the gains resulting from such a move.

Design/methodology/approach

A thorough literature search on various databases and on various aspects of this topic was reviewed. The literature review is organised on emerging themes directly drawn from the literature, thematically and chronologically within each section. It aims to identify the changing perspectives, the current challenges, and the benefits offered by examining information science specialists' views. The main marketing concepts are identified throughout a strategic planning approach, which has been recommended as the most successful by the majority of researchers.

This paper examines and clarifies the existing misunderstandings and difficulties in library and information services marketing, and stresses the importance of its adoption in this contemporary competitive environment. It examines library marketing in six sections: misconceptions regarding library marketing, main challenges and reasons as to why the adoption of marketing concepts is an integral part of the strategic planning, reports on the international library organizations, provides a description of the implementation of strategic marketing and planning processes, presents some library marketing approaches and examines the contemporary technological opportunities for library marketing in the digital era, such as the use of Web 2.0 tools.

Originality/value

The paper broadens the library marketing literature by gathering researchers' scientific views and advice and identifies the main implementation concerns derived from the earlier and more recent relevant literature. Moreover, for the first time, IT records issues concerning library marketing, social media and Web 2.0.

• Library management
• Social media
• Library services
• Information services
• Library and information services
• Library marketing concepts
• Strategic library marketing
• Marketing mix
• Library 2.0

Garoufallou, E. , Siatri, R. , Zafeiriou, G. and Balampanidou, E. (2013), "The use of marketing concepts in library services: a literature review", Library Review , Vol. 62 No. 4/5, pp. 312-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-06-2012-0061

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing - try for free!

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.

Try for free

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved March 25, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection

A qualitative analysis of the marketing analytics literature: where would ethical issues and legality rank?

Imran bashir dar.

1 Department of Technology Management, Faculty of Management Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Muhammad Bashir Khan

Abdul zahid khan, bahaudin g. mujtaba.

2 Management and Human Resources, Huizenga College of Business and Entrepreneurship, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314-7796 USA

In response to the concerns of global data-driven disruption in marketing, this qualitative study explores the issues and challenges, which could unlock the potential of marketing analytics. This might pave the way, not only for academia–practitioner gap mitigation but also for a better human-centric understanding of utilising the technologically disruptive marketing trends, rather making them a foe. The plethora of marketing issues and challenges were distilled into 45 segments, and a detailed tabulation of the significant ones has been depicted for analysis and discussion. Furthermore, the conceptually thick five literary containers were developed, by coupling the constructs as per similarity in their categorical nature and connections. The ‘ethical issues and legality’ was identified as on the top, which provided literary comprehension and managerial implication for marketing analytics conceptualisation in the fourth industrial revolution era.

Introduction

The three dominant approaches (institutional, functional, commodity) used in past decades for dealing with overall marketing science concepts seem to be losing their viability with speed (Shepherd 1955 ), parallel to the availability of digital business avenues and diversity in sources of data (Hauser 2007 ; Dasan 2013 ; Wedel and Kannan 2016 ). Therefore, the analytics approach, with a problem-solving thinking frame, though had been discussed in the 1950s, is being observably adapted, and outcomes in terms of causation are continuously being gauged. Thoughtfully, academia has been left behind in this case, where now curriculum innovation (Wilson et al. 2018 ) and a shift of practices to gain academic coherence is being reportedly welcomed (Davenport and Harris 2017 ).

As per the field of Marketing, the mapping and quantification of causality are becoming the core of Marketing science, which is mastered by Marketing Analytics with a focus on action ability and informed decisions that have strategic value while not overlooking hard-data evidence (Grigsby 2015 , pp. 15–16; Rackley 2015 , pp. 1–30). Informed decisions, for the survival of any organisation, must get into action to create readiness for change (reaction) as per the evolution in the outer environment. The same is true for the biologically continued existence of organisms and for simple things as driving a car without a dashboard (Rackley 2015 , pp. 1–6). Even during the coronavirus pandemic situation, the thorniest question for board rooms today is the usage of disruptive technologies to sustain marketing efforts that could bear fruit (Balis 2020 ; Shah and Shah 2020 ; Waldron and Wetherbe 2020 ).

In terms of defining the concept of marketing analytics, there are many notable research endeavours, from the start of the new millennium, each having its analytical grounds (Davenport and Harris 2017 ). The researchers confined themselves to the sense that could glue the understanding blocks of academia and practitioners. So, marketing analytics has been sensed as exposing oneself to the descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive stages for insightful data reservoirs, for functional intimacy of marketing science in the contemporary world to sustain the competition and get better results through smarter decisions (Davenport and Harris 2017 ; Davenport et al. 2010 ; Davenport 2006 ; Farris et al. 2010 ).

Talking about issues and challenges, marketing analytics is research heaven for academia but a trap for the practitioners, as it has emerged from the process of convergence and divergence of multifaceted business areas (Mahidhar and Davenport 2018 ; Davenport and Kim 2013 ; Davenport and Harris 2007 ). Moreover, it is a continuous struggle to know about the customers before they know about themselves, and it could be done by marketing analytics (Davenport and Harris 2017 ; Farris et al. 2010 ). This can pave the way for a culture that would be conducive for marketing analytics in the corporate world. Marketing analytics is shifting from being merely a buzzword to full-fledge research area that is termed to be multidimensionally nascent, which is apparent by various systematic literature reviews on the subject concerned in connection to data-rich environments (Wedel and Kannan 2016 ), web analytics and key performance indicators (Saura et al. 2017 ), social media metrics (Misirlis and Vlachopoulou 2018 ), defining the field and convergence status (Krishen and Petrescu 2018 ), data mining (Dam et al. 2019 ), links to other fields and methods (France and Ghose 2019 ), research and practice environments (Iacobucci et al. 2019 ), and prescriptive analytics (Lepenioti et al. 2020 ).

Presently, senior marketing professionals are worried about their ability to measure these factors (Mahidhar and Davenport 2018 ). The data reservoirs are available, but the aligned mechanism for converting the data into actionable insights is observed to be a big missing link (Farris et al. 2010 ), which could result in analytically strategical misfit from consumer and marketing perspective (Zhang et al. 2010 ). Therefore, marketing analytics could be a threat to almost all the business models for pre-data backed economy, held globally. This may be termed as sustainable disruption, which means a continuous rigorous change (Davenport and Kim 2013 , pp 105–110). Moreover, it is evident that the improvement in technology has been phenomenal in the past century; still, the remarks of Peter Drucker are relevant in terms of computer and man, so the study of the issues and challenges would be necessary to mitigate any risks of failure (Guercini 2020 ). Therefore, despite the plethora of books and articles on the problem area concerned, a lack of research is apparent in terms of exhaustively studying the marketing analytics issues and challenges.

Procedural genesis for systematic literature review (SLR)

As pointed out by connection between decades of research that the view about systematic literature review (SLR) has been evolving and enriching itself (Webster and Watson 2002 ). Therefore, confining to a step-by-step approach and sticking to a set pattern defined by past research, which have been cited by the majority of the researches, were followed by the researchers for a line of action that could result in a significant research outcome (Levy and Ellis 2006 ; Okoli and Schabram 2010 ). The steps were grouped into three levels as input planning, process execution, and outcome reporting, by following the steps as reflected in Fig.  1 .

PRISMA statement

PRISMA, “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses”, is one of the most endorsed ways for diagrammatically reporting the quality and rigour of systematic literature reviews. Therefore, the researchers applied the guidelines by Moher et al. ( 2009 ), with 62,621 citations, known as the “PRISMA Statement”.

Apart from reporting the systematic review, AMSTAR “measurement tool for assessment of systematic reviews” was studied (Shea et al. 2009 ), cited 1506 times, to enhance the quality of this study in terms of methodological validity and reliability. Additionally, the structure of “PICOS”, “participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study design” was followed to clarify the scope of this study in terms of the multiple interventions and criteria (Smith et al. 2011 ; Van den Bosch and Sang 2017 ). Therefore, the quality assessment and enhancement of reporting, methodological aspects, and scope were exhausted through applying PRISMA, learning from the AMSTAR tool and following PICOS. The researchers did their best in not compromising on any level and dimension for developing a valuable and comprehensive systematic literature review study.

SLR process step by step

The PRISMA statement has four dimensions: (i) Identification, (ii) Screening, (iii) Eligibility, and (iv) Included, as reflected in Fig.  1 . These dimensions are further bifurcated into five steps. First, research questions were developed based on the current basic understanding of the problem from the call for papers and impactful recent research reservoir available from various databases and high-quality journals. The backward search in terms of the references, authors, and keywords was done to see through the results for any missing piece of research work, based on which the present work has been carried out (Webster and Watson 2002 ). Additionally, the forward search was done to review the further contribution of authors and its relevance to the problem. Moreover, the forward reference search was exercised to check the selected being cited by other researchers. This exercise of backward and forward search equipped the researchers with a basic picture of the theoretical contributions in terms of the problem at hand (Fig.  2 ).

Explored marketing analytics issues and challenges (MAICs)

The second step to identify the related studies by applying multiple metrics (Harzing 2007 ) . Third, the search metrics were accompanied by time frame and other restrictions, along with key search terms for exploring the digitally available research reservoirs. The fourth step has been inclusion and exclusion process application on the filtered body of quality research work. At this stage, the spearhead inspection of the literary reservoir is executed in terms of problem and research questions relevancy. The fifth step is to synthesise the finalised stream of research work, having a significant contribution in the problem area.

Research questions

This research study is aimed to address the proceeding research questions:

What sort of issues and challenges related to marketing analytics implementation were identified by the past research?

What are the most critical/highly ranked issues and challenges of marketing analytics (2000 to 2020)?

Criterion based exhaustive literature exploration

The level of exhaustiveness is measured by observation of search outcomes through “Publish or Perish 7” (PoP7) software sourced from Harzing ( 2007 ), accompanied with backward and forward searches, through different keywords relating to various dimensions of the research questions being considered. Once the output gets repeatedly and notably similar to previous search exercises, then the reliable maturity level could be achieved. For this purpose, a wide variety of carefully selected keywords, based on topic/area, marketing analytics, in this case, are used in a variety of combination through applying Boolean operators like OR/NOT/AND to enhance the “search reach” and enrich “search depth” (Webster and Watson 2002 ; Hedges and Cooper 2009 ; Baker 2016 ). The relevancy of the keywords was adapted by first searching for the highly cited articles discussing “marketing analytics” and fetching keywords for issues and challenges from them. Afterwards, those keywords, such as “marketing analytics” AND “barrier” OR “challenge”, “strategy”, “issue”, “failure”, “success”, “implementation”, “performance”, “measurement”, “understanding”, “problem”, “application”, “operation”, “process”, “execution”, “acceptance”, “critical success factors”, “marketing analytics implementation challenges”, and “marketing analytics implementation issues and challenges”. Total papers (deleting all duplications, excluding other material) extracted were 854 from which only 73 highly cited articles were selected. Notably, even after searching through coupling the issues and challenges keywords with “marketing analytics”, the filters of the rigorous study were plugged in to go beyond search metrics.

Databases and digitalised reservoirs

For furthering the research process, decision making for the selection of databases has been projected by backward and forward search, which presented the journals and publishers having the most relevant and impactful number of articles. Therefore, the question of “where” and “how” has been addressed for the readiness of review (Levy and Ellis 2006 ). The databases below are the filtered reservoirs, as per citations and relevancy of the articles related to the issues and challenges, and availability at the university library or beyond it:

• Harvard Business Press
• Taylor & Francis
• Wiley Online Library
• Journals of American Marketing Association (AMA)
• INFORMS PubsOnline
• Ingenta Connect

Filtration and extraction of research articles

The amalgamation of the research articles through strict numerous restrictions has been ground into final filtration by exploring the content in them in terms of the problem area, marketing analytics issues, and challenges, as per the past research available. The articles that notably and chiefly discussed the issues and challenges were extracted after review, and the remaining studies were abandoned (Levy and Ellis 2006 ; Hedges and Cooper 2009 ). The numbers of the selected papers for review were narrowed by exerting the following metrics:

• (i) As reflected in the step three of PRISMA statement, the papers having relevant and quality research (peer-reviewed, impact factor journals and high citations) were selected
• (ii) The research papers or conference papers that are not peer reviewed, duplicates, and nonrelevant papers were discarded
• (iii) Articles written in English language, published within the time frame of 2000–2020, discussing the issues and challenges of marketing analytics in a reasonable manner were included (Levy and Ellis 2006 ; Okoli and Schabram 2010 ).

The researcher for point (i) first checked the relevancy of the research paper or conference paper and whether they are peer reviewed or not. This does not mean that the researchers filtered the relevant research papers or conference papers that were peer reviewed and were not impact factor or highly cited. Actually, the fifth stage of “PRISMA Statement” steered the researchers to finalise and extract the articles having significant contribution, which resulted in terms of impact factor journal articles mostly that were eventually highly cited as well. It can be tracked from the results reflected in “Table 6 —ScientoMetrics-Quartile Analytics” that 92% of the finalised papers are categorised within Q1 to Q3, whereas 80% are from Q1.

ScientoMetrics-quartile analytics

This extensive exercise paved the way for finalised selection of 59 papers (only a handful) from 73 highly cited, based on the original result of 997 that were selected, as detailed in Tables ​ Tables1 1 and ​ and2 2 (Table ​ (Table3 3 ).

Sum of holistic search by research databases

The bold values signify the numeric result in terms of frequency for the research papers observed as per the captioned criteria

Research articles filtered/finalised by research databases

Theoretical mapping of marketing analytics (2000–2020)

Synthesise and evaluation

The papers discussing marketing analytics issue and challenges identified in Table ​ Table2 2 pave the way for detailed synthesis as per research question 1. Table ​ Table4 4 projects the issues and challenges of marketing analytics for the previous two decades. The papers have been organised in terms of their publication year and details about the specific qualitative and quantitative method that is provided as well.

Marketing analytics issues and challenges (2000–2020)

The exhaustive search for the marketing issues and challenges from the relevant, impactful, and having significant contribution reflected, along with the overall literature synthesis, reflected the list of 45 marketing analytics issues and challenges, captioned as Marketing Analytics Issues and Challenges (MAICs 1–45), in Table ​ Table5. 5 . From these MAICs, the non-significant ones have been dropped, which can be traced from the numbering of the issues and challenges accordingly, in Table ​ Table4. 4 . The citations and journal information about the finalised 59 research papers are tabulated in Appendix. Moreover, Table ​ Table6 6 (ScientoMetrics-Quartile Analytics) shows the impact of the journals in which the papers have been published, ranging from Q1 to Q3.

List of the marketing analytics issues & challenges (MAICs)

Analysis and discussion

The exhaustive study of the finalised articles in terms of the issues and challenges reflected that the ethical issues and legality dimension are at the top in terms of frequency-based ranking. The ethical issues and legality involve the legal implementation of consumer rights protection in terms of privacy and usage of customer personal data. Moreover, the impact of organisational operations on consumers has to be made transparent enough so that user consent would be sought. Other issues and concerns related to implementation are concerned with the marketing analytics ecosystem.

By following the mapping and classification style of previous studies (Adams et al. 2016 ; Bembom and Schwens 2018 ; Bocconcelli et al. 2018 ; Ceipek et al. 2019 ; Klang et al. 2014 ; Nguyen et al. 2018 ; Popay et al. 2006 ; Tranfield et al. 2003 ; Zahoor et al. 2020 ), the theoretical categorisation depicts that the five literary grounds titled as RBT/RBV, Upper Echelons Theory, Organisational Learning theory, Dynamic Capability Theory/DCV, and Institutional Theory are the most influential ones in terms of constructs projected and notable research studies. This projects that the marketing analytics can be better explained by utilisation of the theoretical paradigm provided by the above, which could pave the way for further deeper studies.

Apart from the above-tabulated theories, many other theories have been employed, which include Complexity Theory (Xu et al. 2016 ; Vargo and Lusch 2017 ), Knowledge-Based View (Côrte-Real et al. 2017 ), SERVQUAL Model (Lemon and Verhoef 2016 ), Relationship Marketing Theory (Lemon and Verhoef 2016 ), Motivation-Hygiene Theory (Rutter et al. 2016 ), Supply Chain Management Theory (Schoenherr and Speier‐Pero 2015 ), Marketing Performance Measurement Theory (Järvinen and Karjaluoto 2015 ), Marketing Capability Theory (Mu 2015 ), Knowledge Management Theory (Holsapple et al. 2014 ), and Reciprocal Action Theory as well as Social Identity Theory (Chan et al. 2014 ).

Table ​ Table6 6 depicts that 92% of the total articles (54 articles) are part of Q1–Q3 journals, where 47 studies are from Q1 journals, which means that 80% of the detail in Table ​ Table4 4 is composed of the best available past studies based on the latest scientometrics.

For RQ2, the researchers classified the issues and challenges into the five themes depicting the core learning from this study that would pave the way for further studies:

Customer-centric strategic structures & customer engagement

The element of co-creation is apparent where organisations have to behave proactively to know what the customers want before they do, and to make them partners in seeking a competitive advantage. Consumer-based structures are being observed as the way forward for structural capitalisation that could support the information value chain (Mikalef et al. 2018 ; Sheng et al. 2017 ).

Integrated marketing communication (IMC) channels are the gateway for developing an ecosystem of customer relationship management so that targeted consumer engagement could be done for mental programming for description, diagnosis, prediction, and personalised prescription of customer lifetime experience management (Lemon and Verhoef 2016 ; Mikalef et al. 2018 ). Furthermore, for the sake of quant, the process of metrics alignment for not falling into the vicious trap of GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) marketing performance measures could be done when academia joins hands with practitioners and the foggy gap between two is cleared (Sheng et al. 2017 ). Furthermore, customer engagement in this age of personalisation is to go beyond purchase and build a platform through value exchange from and to marketer versus consumer, while assessing the psychological state of the customer in terms of participating in different initiatives of the marketer (Lemon and Verhoef 2016 ). Therefore, paving the way forward for the co-production of values through engagement platforms that are a mix of brick-n-mortar. This cycle of knowledge creation needs a mechanism of data insight extraction for actionable decision making (Xu et al. 2016 ).

For this purpose, the pre-analytics age conventional marketing strategies may not be that relevant for online brand communities, social networking sites, and consumer-based business structuring, where beyond text communication tools could be used and customers could be rewarded on their category of user (Chan et al. 2014 ). For the same reason, the concept of sharing economy and alignment of co-creation metrics to it have been considered as the key to unlocking future research and field opportunities (Kannan 2017 ).

Marketing analytics sticky culture & management practices

The system propelled culture accompanied by resource-based view (RBV) has been depicted to possess the operational grip for conversion into organisational capability. The management practices revolving around RBV categorise each factor into the classification of resources that involve data reservoirs, infrastructural foundation, and information systems installations. Process-oriented benchmarking is rehearsed, and metrics are prioritised accordingly (Mikalef et al. 2018 ). The marketing analytics sticky culture is sourced from the data-driven organisational culture where people, irrespective of their authority and hierarchical managerial positions, do indulge in decision-making practices that are backed by the informational projections extracted from data. Moreover, the data-driven management practices do mitigate silos decisions and propagate interdependency of actions (Wang and Hajli 2017 ).

In this jigsaw of data-driven marketing analytics, sticky analytics culture, and management practices, the issue of ethical consideration for usage of customer data and mix of customer consent versus reward is a nascent one that calls for further research (Martin and Murphy 2017 ).

Shifting the paradigm from RBV to knowledge-based view (KBV), Côrte-Real et al. ( 2017 ) are of the view that data analytics reservoirs are a network of knowledge-steered value chains that are not restricted to organisational boundaries and customer–marketer exchange mediums. These external value chains of knowledge that could promise operational agility and widening the business canvas are the next big thing to explore for competitive sustainability.

The ecosystem of marketing analytics is a whirl of RBV and KBV paradigms of industrialisation 4.0 where each function of marketing has its own set of analytical measurements for performance management. Therefore, further spearhead mapping of marketing-mix investment portfolios in high-tech or IT conducive environments is imperative (Lemon and Verhoef 2016 ; Wedel and Kannan 2016 ; Sheng et al. 2017 ).

As a crux, the aggressive proactive management practices for crafting system-oriented analytics sticky culture are necessary, which could integrate relevant management practices with overall business objectives (Mikalef et al. 2018 ; Chen et al. 2012 ). This would make insightful data utilisation that a management strategic priority would reflect the organisational agility phase. Moreover, an inclusively developed reservoir of management learning behaviours to re-adjust, re-align, and re-do practices could develop an indigenous culture. This could help the organisation to have capabilities that are hard to copy (Kannan 2017 ; Sheng et al. 2017 ).

Geo-location-based sense, data mining, and content management

The geo-location-based sense through social media management while taking care of the ethical issues and legality issues is vital to utilise the value from social mediums. Data-backed sense of social issues is a plus in this arena. The market strategies are to be ground in marketing core objectives, where knowledge sharing and change readiness are top of the line for the fifth revolution, marked by personalisation. The IT resource management for this shift is a major barrier that creates big data issues. This connects to the dearth of need analysis in terms of skill requirement and training/curriculum correspondents to analytics techniques and technological issues that disturb the customer experience management agenda (Wang and Hajli 2017 ; Bradlow et al. 2017 ; Martin and Murphy 2017 ; Sheng et al. 2017 ).

Surprisingly, Mobile analytics, as being the portable platform, has raised the bar for platform-free content management, where user-generated content is much valued for better acceptability. The disruption is caused in terms of customer privacy and security issues, where the race for EWOM & ROI has eroded societal sense. Therefore, counter disruptive technologies are imperative for governance, to develop dynamic capabilities for future marketing analytics (Mikalef et al. 2018 ; Sheng et al. 2017 ; Wedel and Kannan 2016 ; Chen et al. 2012 ).

Insightful data utilisation & performance measures

The need analysis of the business competition in terms of dynamic market capabilities and disruptive technological change sets the stage for alignment of the data management and valuation strategies (Mikalef et al. 2018 ). These strategies reflect the operations for data utilisation for the actionable insights as per the impact metrics defined for the communication channels where consumers exercise their consumer power. The digital orientation of marketing mix is exercised for mapping of the gaps in talent requirement, organisational agility, actionable metrics, and sharing the profits from marketing analytics with customers (Leeflang et al. 2014 ; Bradlow et al. 2017 ).

For this purpose, rigorous extraction and utilisation of data insights have been done through a deeper study of marketing data analytics for tracking the business process transformations that may indicate the untapped value reservoirs of “blue ocean” customer profits (Wang and Hajli 2017 ). Martin and Murphy ( 2017 ) stressed forwarding of profitability share to the customer through reward mechanism in this situation for a long-term relationship and value creation in marketing analytics age (Sheng et al. 2017 ). Wedel and Kannan ( 2016 ) presented the novel research methods for marketing analytics and depicted the connection between privacy and data security, marketing mix, and personalisation. Moreover, the future buying patterns of customers and exploration of developing service instruments in accordance calls for the usage of smart data snatching tools that could seamlessly apply metrics for customer tracking (Bradlow et al. 2017 ). The performance measures attached to this exercise may involve the issues of customer privacy and data security that needs to be vigilantly handled. The area of customer data security and privacy embedded with legal issues is a nascent marketing analytics arena that calls for further empirical research.

Besides, the marketing analytics heterogeneity enrichment is being in limelight through work on content marketing, web analytics, automation of marketing processes, and development of marketing analytics curriculum based on empiricism, as per pressing demand for unfathomable insight of related performance measures (Järvinen and Taiminen 2016 ; Schoenherr and Speier‐Pero 2015 ).

Ethical issues & legality

The most unique challenge for marketing analytics is composed of dimensions of business ethics and legality. The ethical issues involve intentional or unintentional customer privacy invasion through digitalised seamless data extraction and scanning mechanisms that could lead the company into a troublesome situation in terms of customer data privacy and security (Mikalef et al. 2018 ; Sheng et al. 2017 ).

With a balance between the customer privacy dynamics and organisational need, a reward system is a key to refrain from any conflicting situation. For this purpose, metrics must be aligned with the ethical consideration and legality issues. Moreover, the area of ethical issues and legality is complex as well as nascent in terms of research work. Therefore, demand for further research in terms of legal applications ranging from operations of web analytics to mobile analytics as privacy and protection of data is empirically evident (Sheng et al. 2017 ).

There are a variety of opinions and views floated by researchers in this regard. The performance benchmarks should be aligned with organisational dynamic capabilities (Mikalef et al. 2018 ) and the ecosystem for modulation of the customer-centric sharing economy (Kannan 2017 ) may be devised for customer profitability enhancement (Wang and Hajli 2017 ). Bradlow et al ( 2017 ) talked about customer tracking and ethical considerations. Martin and Murphy ( 2017 ) portrayed the ethical and legal dimensions of analytics in terms of data privacy, level of usage and sharing, and access nature. Côrte-Real et al. ( 2017 ) depicted the KBV perspective of analytics and data dynamics that broaden the scope of legal operations as the external channels of knowledge require legal scrutiny. Sheng et al. ( 2017 ) discussed convergence and divergence of various fields in connection in this regard. Lemon and Verhoef ( 2016 ) along with Wedel and Kannan ( 2016 ) talked about customer purchase behaviour tracking, personalisation, and ethical issues and legality mix in terms of marketing analytics. Schoenherr and Speier‐Pero ( 2015 ) depicted the curriculum development, empiricism, and legality depth. Mu ( 2015 ) researched marketing capability, product innovation, and novel legal complexities. Leeflang et al. ( 2014 ) studied the ethically and legality-wise proactive practices of professional marketers in the digitalised era. Furthermore, Chen et al. ( 2012 ) mobile analytics and technical areas connected with ethics and legality for preparing for the back-end processes.

The literacy thick encapsulation of 45 marketing analytics issues and challenges has been done based on theoretical significance and empirical sense into five construct-bonded layers that are customer-centric strategic structures and customer engagement, marketing analytics sticky culture, and management practices geo-location-based sense and data mining as well as content management, insightful data utilisation and performance measures, and ethical issues and legality. Together, they reflect the patterns in the high-quality literature spanning around two decades.

Moreover, all the marketing issues and challenges have been further classified into the process, people, outcome, and strategy as per the nature of the constructs explored from the literature. This further comprehends that the plethora of issues and challenges are triggered by these channels. Therefore, further research in terms of process-driven, people perspective, outcome-oriented, strategy-specified avenues of marketing analytics may support enrichment to this field brought by the fourth industrial revolution.

Limitations

The search metrics and selection process of the quality papers between the periods 2000 and 2020 have limitations as the canvas is not so wide to cater for the concept of marketing analytics issues and challenges from inception to conception, as in the case of meta-analysis. The trend of papers does reflect that the research problem is new and much of the research has been done in between the two decades, yet the systematic literature review has its limited grounds in terms of other research methodologies. So, widening the canvas of research in terms of the research period, research design, and other factors would provide deeper insight for the academic and practitioner community.

Core implications

Ethical and legal issues have been the most prominent ones, which depict that the legal acumen capability is the steering point for any company to save itself from any business-related challenges. The intangibles are the “new tangibles” for dealing with marketing analytics issues and challenges as companies have to work on their dynamic as well as inclusive capabilities of breeding co-creation culture through customer-centric strategic structures and customer engagement. This is marked by the alignment of performance measures with rigorous utilisation of actionable data insights.

Further research considerations

Marketing analytics demands a shift in the operational capabilities of the companies in terms of people, process, strategy, and outcomes. These dimensions call for further research in terms of each of the significant issues and challenges in heterogeneous industries, while setting the research canvas to regional alliances and international ones as well. This will provide a fruitful mapping reservoir for regional and international comparative analysis across various industries. Moreover, the SLRs in the area projected that areas and the learning from this study project that

• The convergence of stages of analytics (Descriptive, Diagnostic, Predictive, Prescriptive) and marketing science is a high call to check the issues and challenges at each stage.
• The reasons for significant issues and challenges, along with their remedies and territorial best practices, are composed of the broad range of research work yet to be done
• Mix methodology research has to be adapted for looking at the phenomena and defining its constructs; afterwards, those constructs should be converted into variables by scale development. Furthermore, the development of indigenous scales for each of the issues and challenges in terms of countries will provide better inclusive measurement yardsticks, which is the need of the fourth industrial revolution.

Domain classification of issues and challenges

• A systematic literature review for issues and challenges in terms of marketing metrics has been depicted by the present study.
• The common issues and challenges of marketing intelligence and marketing analytics are a vital area that would pave the way for 4.0 readiness by the developing economies.

Biographies

is a PhD Scholar at Faculty of Management Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. He is a permanent Faculty member at Foundation University, Islamabad, Pakistan. He has taught in various public and private universities. His research interests are marketing intelligence and analytics. He has field experience in Marketing and Educational Logistics & Supply Chain Management.

is an Ex Dean at Faculty of Management Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. He is an Ex Vice President Academics in the same university. He has more than 30 years of university teaching experience. He is research expertise in organisational behaviour and marketing science.

Abdul Zahid Zahid

is a Chairman for Department of Technology Management, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. His research publications in reputable journals are Knowledge Management, Technology Management, Information Science, Computer and Society, and Information Systems. He has more than 20 years of university teaching experience.

is a Professor of Human Resources Management at Nova Southeastern University in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. He is the author and co-author of several professional and academic books dealing with diversity, ethics, and management, as well as numerous academic journal articles. During the past twenty-five years, he has had the pleasure of working with human resource professionals in the United States, Canada, Brazil, Bahamas, Afghanistan, Pakistan, St. Lucia, Grenada, Malaysia, Japan, Vietnam, China, India, Thailand, and Jamaica. This diverse exposure has provided him many insights in ethics, culture, and management from the perspectives of different firms, people groups, and countries. Bahaudin can be reached at: [email protected]

Declarations

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Imran Bashir Dar, Email: [email protected] .

Muhammad Bashir Khan, Email: moc.evil@rihsabdhomrd , Email: [email protected] .

Abdul Zahid Khan, Email: [email protected] .

Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, Email: ude.avon@abatjum , Email: ude.avon@abaatjum , https://www.nova.edu .

• Adams R, Jeanrenaud S, Bessant J, Denyer D, Overy P. Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2016; 18 (2):180–205. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12068. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Amado A, Cortez P, Rita P, Moro S. Research trends on Big Data in marketing: A text mining and topic modeling based literature analysis. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 2018; 24 (1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.06.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Archak N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG. Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Science. 2011; 57 (8):1485–1509. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1370. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baker JD. The purpose, process, and methods of writing a literature review. AORN Journal. 2016; 103 (3):265–269. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2016.01.016. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Balis, J. 2020. Brand marketing through the coronavirus crisis.  Harvard Business Review. Retrieved February 12, 2020, from https://hbr.org/2020/04/brand-marketing-through-the-coronavirus-crisis
• Baltes LP. Content marketing-the fundamental tool of digital marketing. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Economic Sciences. Series. 2015; 8 (2):111–118. [ Google Scholar ]
• Banerjee A, Bandyopadhyay T, Acharya P. Data analytics: Hyped up aspirations or true potential? Vikalpa. 2013; 38 (4):1–12. doi: 10.1177/0256090920130401. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Barger VA, Labrecque L. An integrated marketing communications perspective on social media metrics. International Journal of Integrated Marketing Communications. 2013; 2 :64–76. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bembom M, Schwens C. The role of networks in early internationalizing firms: A systematic review and future research agenda. European Management Journal. 2018; 36 (6):679–694. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2018.03.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bocconcelli R, Cioppi M, Fortezza F, Francioni B, Pagano A, Savelli E, Splendiani S. SMEs and marketing: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2018; 20 (2):227–254. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12128. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bradlow ET, Gangwar M, Kopalle P, Voleti S. The role of big data and predictive analytics in retailing. Journal of Retailing. 2017; 93 (1):79–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.004. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Breugelmans E, Bijmolt TH, Zhang J, Basso LJ, Dorotic M, Kopalle P, Wünderlich NV. Advancing research on loyalty programs: A future research agenda. Marketing Letters. 2015; 26 (2):127–139. doi: 10.1007/s11002-014-9311-4. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ceipek R, Hautz J, Mayer MC, Matzler K. Technological diversification: A systematic review of antecedents, outcomes and moderating effects. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2019; 21 (4):466–497. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12205. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chan TK, Zheng X, Cheung CM, Lee MK, Lee ZW. Antecedents and consequences of customer engagement in online brand communities. Journal of Marketing Analytics. 2014; 2 (2):81–97. doi: 10.1057/jma.2014.9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chang RM, Kauffman RJ, Kwon Y. Understanding the paradigm shift to computational social science in the presence of big data. Decision Support Systems. 2014; 63 (7):67–80. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2013.08.008. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC. Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly. 2012; 36 (4):1165–1188. doi: 10.2307/41703503. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Côrte-Real N, Oliveira T, Ruivo P. Assessing business value of Big Data analytics in European firms. Journal of Business Research. 2017; 70 (1):379–390. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.011. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dam NAK, Le Dinh T, Menvielle W. Marketing Intelligence from Data Mining Perspective. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. 2019; 10 (5):184–190. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dasan P. Small & medium enterprise assessment in Czech Republic & Russia using marketing analytics methodology. Central European Business Review. 2013; 2 (4):39–49. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.63. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Davenport TH. Competing on analytics. Harvard Business Review. 2006; 84 (1):98. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Davenport TH, Harris JG. Competing on Analytics. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation; 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
• Davenport T, Harris J. Competing on analytics: Updated, with a new introduction: The new science of winning. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Davenport TH, Harris JG, Morison R. Analytics at work: Smarter decisions, better results. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Davenport TH, Kim J. Keeping up with the quants: Your guide to understanding and using analytics. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press; 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Duan L, Xiong Y. Big data analytics and business analytics. Journal of Management Analytics. 2015; 2 (1):1–21. doi: 10.1080/23270012.2015.1020891. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dwivedi YK, Kapoor KK, Chen H. Social media marketing and advertising. The Marketing Review. 2015; 15 (3):289–309. doi: 10.1362/146934715X14441363377999. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Farris PW, Bendle N, Pfeifer PE, Reibstein D. Marketing metrics: The definitive guide to measuring marketing performance. London: Pearson Education; 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• France SL, Ghose S. Marketing analytics: Methods, practice, implementation, and links to other fields. Expert Systems with Applications. 2019; 119 (5):456–475. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Frizzo-Barker J, Chow-White PA, Mozafari M, Ha D. An empirical study of the rise of big data in business scholarship. International Journal of Information Management. 2016; 36 (3):403–413. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.01.006. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• George G, Osinga EC, Lavie D, Scott BA. Big data and data science methods for management research. Academy of Management Journal. 2016; 59 (5):1493–1507. doi: 10.5465/amj.2016.4005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Germann F, Lilien GL, Rangaswamy A. Performance implications of deploying marketing analytics. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2013; 30 (2):114–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.10.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ghose A, Han SP. Estimating demand for mobile applications in the new economy. Management Science. 2014; 60 (6):1470–1488. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1945. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B. Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowdsourced content. Marketing Science. 2012; 31 (3):493–520. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1110.0700. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ghose A, Yang S. An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Management Science. 2009; 55 (10):1605–1622. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1054. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C. Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Science. 2011; 30 (3):389–404. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1100.0583. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Goldfarb A, Tucker CE. Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Science. 2011; 57 (1):57–71. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1246. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Grigsby M. Marketing analytics: A practical guide to real marketing science. London: Kogan Page Publishers; 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Guercini S. Editoriale: The actor or the machine? The strategic marketing decision-maker facing digitalization. Micro & Macro Marketing. 2020; 29 (1):3–7. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hanssens DM, Pauwels KH. Demonstrating the value of marketing. Journal of Marketing. 2016; 80 (6):173–190. doi: 10.1509/jm.15.0417. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harrigan P, Hulbert B. How can marketing academics serve marketing practice? The new marketing DNA as a model for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education. 2011; 33 (3):253–272. doi: 10.1177/0273475311420234. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harris L, Rae A. Social networks: The future of marketing for small business. Journal of Business Strategy. 2009; 30 (5):24–31. doi: 10.1108/02756660910987581. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harris L, Rae A. Building a personal brand through social networking. Journal of Business Strategy. 2011; 32 (5):14–21. doi: 10.1108/02756661111165435. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harzing, A.W. 2007. Publish or perish [computer software] https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish . Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
• Hauser WJ. Marketing analytics: The evolution of marketing research in the twenty-first century. Direct Marketing: An International Journal. 2007; 1 (1):38–54. doi: 10.1108/17505930710734125. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hedges, L. V., and Cooper, H. 2009. Research synthesis as a scientific process.  The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis ,  1 . Russell Sage Foundation. New York
• Hofacker CF, Malthouse EC, Sultan F. Big data and consumer behavior: Imminent opportunities. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2016; 33 (2):89–97. doi: 10.1108/JCM-04-2015-1399. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Holsapple C, Lee-Post A, Pakath R. A unified foundation for business analytics. Decision Support Systems. 2014; 64 (8):130–141. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.013. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hsu LC, Wang CH. Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: The mediating role of dynamic capability. British Journal of Management. 2012; 23 (2):179–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00718.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Iacobucci D, Petrescu M, Krishen A, Bendixen M. The state of marketing analytics in research and practice. Journal of Marketing Analytics. 2019; 7 (3):152–181. doi: 10.1057/s41270-019-00059-2. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Järvinen J, Karjaluoto H. The use of Web analytics for digital marketing performance measurement. Industrial Marketing Management. 2015; 50 (7):117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.04.009. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Järvinen J, Taiminen H. Harnessing marketing automation for B2B content marketing. Industrial Marketing Management. 2016; 54 (3):164–175. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.07.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jeffery M. Data-driven marketing: The 15 metrics everyone in marketing should know. Wiley; 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kannan PK. Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2017; 34 (1):22–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Klang D, Wallnöfer M, Hacklin F. The business model paradox: A systematic review and exploration of antecedents. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2014; 16 (4):454–478. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12030. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Knittel CR, Stango V. Celebrity endorsements, firm value, and reputation risk: Evidence from the Tiger Woods scandal. Management Science. 2014; 60 (1):21–37. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1749. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Koskela-Huotari K, Edvardsson B, Jonas JM, Sörhammar D, Witell L. Innovation in service ecosystems—Breaking, making, and maintaining institutionalized rules of resource integration. Journal of Business Research. 2016; 69 (8):2964–2971. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.029. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Krishen AS, Petrescu M. Marketing analytics: Delineating the field while welcoming crossover. Journal of Marketing Analytics. 2018; 6 (4):117–119. doi: 10.1057/s41270-018-0046-6. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Leeflang PS, Verhoef PC, Dahlström P, Freundt T. Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era. European Management Journal. 2014; 32 (1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lemon KN, Verhoef PC. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing. 2016; 80 (6):69–96. doi: 10.1509/jm.15.0420. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lepenioti K, Bousdekis A, Apostolou D, Mentzas G. Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Information Management. 2020; 50 (1):57–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Levy Y, Ellis TJ. A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science. 2006; 9 (1):181–212. doi: 10.28945/479. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lilien GL. Bridging the academic-practitioner divide in marketing decision models. Journal of Marketing. 2011; 75 (4):196–210. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.75.4.196. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mahidhar, V., and Davenport, T. H. 2018. Why companies that wait to adopt AI may never catch up.  Harvard Business Review 6. https://hbr.org/2018/12/why-companies-that-wait-to-adopt-ai-may-never-catch-up Accessed 13 May 2020.
• Martin KD, Murphy PE. The role of data privacy in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2017; 45 (2):135–155. doi: 10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mikalef P, Pappas IO, Krogstie J, Giannakos M. Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Information Systems and e-Business Management. 2018; 16 (3):547–578. doi: 10.1007/s10257-017-0362-y. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mikalef P, Pateli A, Batenburg RS, Van de Wetering R. Purchasing alignment under multiple contingencies: A configuration theory approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2015; 115 (4):625–645. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-10-2014-0298. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Misirlis N, Vlachopoulou M. Social media metrics and analytics in marketing-S3M: A mapping literature review. International Journal of Information Management. 2018; 38 (1):270–276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.10.005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., and Prisma Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine. 2009; 6 (7):1–6. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Montalvo RE. Social media management. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS) 2011; 15 (3):91–96. doi: 10.19030/ijmis.v15i3.4645. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Morgan NA, Rego LL. The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting business performance. Marketing Science. 2006; 25 (5):426–439. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1050.0180. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mu J. Marketing capability, organizational adaptation and new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management. 2015; 49 (6):151–166. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Neslin SA, Shankar V. Key issues in multichannel customer management: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2009; 23 (1):70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nguyen DH, de Leeuw S, Dullaert WE. Consumer behaviour and order fulfilment in online retailing: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2018; 20 (2):255–276. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12129. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Okoli, C., and Schabram, K. 2010. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1954824 Accessed 13 Jan 2020.
• Payne A, Holt S. Diagnosing customer value: Integrating the value process and relationship marketing. British Journal of Management. 2001; 12 (2):159–182. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00192. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pefanis Schlee R, Harich KR. Knowledge and skill requirements for marketing jobs in the 21st century. Journal of Marketing Education. 2010; 32 (3):341–352. doi: 10.1177/0273475310380881. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., et al. 2006. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews.  A product from the ESRC methods programme Version ,  1 , b92.
• Rackley J. Marketing analytics roadmap. New York City: Apress; 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., and Prentice, P. K. 2016. Beyond the hype: the hard work behind analytics success.  MIT Sloan Management Review 57 (3). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1778453021/DC1683D1E36D4D81PQ/15?accountid=135034 Accessed 12 May 2020.
• Rust RT, Huang MH. The service revolution and the transformation of marketing science. Marketing Science. 2014; 33 (2):206–221. doi: 10.1287/mksc.2013.0836. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rutter R, Roper S, Lettice F. Social media interaction, the university brand and recruitment performance. Journal of Business Research. 2016; 69 (8):3096–3104. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.025. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sanders NR. How to use big data to drive your supply chain. California Management Review. 2016; 58 (3):26–48. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.3.26. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Saura JR, Palos-Sánchez P, Cerdá Suárez LM. Understanding the digital marketing environment with KPIs and web analytics. Future Internet. 2017; 9 (4):76. doi: 10.3390/fi9040076. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schoenherr T, Speier-Pero C. Data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: Current state and future potential. Journal of Business Logistics. 2015; 36 (1):120–132. doi: 10.1111/jbl.12082. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shah, J., and Shah, N. 2020. Fighting coronavirus with big data.  Harvard Business Review, April 06. https://hbr.org/2020/04/fighting-coronavirus-with-big-data 13 May 2020.
• Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Boers M. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009; 62 (10):1013–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheng J, Amankwah-Amoah J, Wang X. A multidisciplinary perspective of big data in management research. International Journal of Production Economics. 2017; 191 (9):97–112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.006. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shepherd G. The analytical problem approach to marketing. Journal of Marketing. 1955; 20 (2):173–177. doi: 10.1177/002224295502000211. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Simpao AF, Ahumada LM, Gálvez JA, Rehman MA. A review of analytics and clinical informatics in health care. Journal of Medical Systems. 2014; 38 (4):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0045-x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2011; 11 (1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-15. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tallon PP, Ramirez RV, Short JE. The information artifact in IT governance: Toward a theory of information governance. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2013; 30 (3):141–178. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300306. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Talke K, Salomo S, Kock A. Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: The relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2011; 28 (6):819–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00851.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tene O, Polenetsky J. To track or do not track: Advancing transparency and individual control in online behavioral advertising. Minn. JL Sci. & Tech. 2012; 13 (1):281–357. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tirunillai S, Tellis GJ. Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Marketing Science. 2012; 31 (2):198–215. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1110.0682. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management. 2003; 14 (3):207–222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van den Bosch M, Sang ÅO. Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health: A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research. 2017; 158 (7):373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vargo SL, Wieland H, Akaka MA. Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management. 2015; 44 (1):63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.008. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF. Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2017; 34 (1):46–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Venkatesan R, Farris P, Wilcox RT. Cutting-edge marketing analytics: Real world cases and data sets for hands on learning. London: Pearson Education; 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Waldron, T. and Wetherbe, J. 2020. Ensure That Your Customer Relationships Outlast Coronavirus. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/04/ensure-that-your-customer-relationships-outlast-coronavirus 19 May 2020.
• Wang Y, Hajli N. Exploring the path to big data analytics success in healthcare. Journal of Business Research. 2017; 70 (1):287–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Webster J, Watson RT. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly. 2002; 26 (2):13–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wedel M, Kannan PK. Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. Journal of Marketing. 2016; 80 (6):97–121. doi: 10.1509/jm.15.0413. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilson EJ, McCabe C, Smith RS. Curriculum innovation for marketing analytics. Marketing Education Review. 2018; 28 (1):52–66. doi: 10.1080/10528008.2017.1419431. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Xu Z, Frankwick GL, Ramirez E. Effects of big data analytics and traditional marketing analytics on new product success: A knowledge fusion perspective. Journal of Business Research. 2016; 69 (5):1562–1566. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.017. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yao S, Mela CF. A dynamic model of sponsored search advertising. Marketing Science. 2011; 30 (3):447–468. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1100.0626. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zahay D, Griffin A. Customer learning processes, strategy selection, and performance in business-to-business service firms. Decision Sciences. 2004; 35 (2):169–203. doi: 10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02338.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zahoor N, Al-Tabbaa O, Khan Z, Wood G. Collaboration and internationalization of SMEs: Insights and recommendations from a systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2020; 22 (4):427–456. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12238. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang J, Farris PW, Irvin JW, Kushwaha T, Steenburgh TJ, Weitz BA. Crafting integrated multichannel retailing strategies. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2010; 24 (2):168–180. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2010.02.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhong RY, Xu C, Chen C, Huang GQ. Big data analytics for physical internet-based intelligent manufacturing shop floors. International Journal of Production Research. 2017; 55 (9):2610–2621. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1086037. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Concept of green marketing in environment conservation: A Literature review

Environmental and Toxicology Management

The concept of green marketing mix is as well as the conventional marketing mix refers to the satisfaction of customer needs, wants, and desires related to the maintenance and preservation of the environment. Consumers interest in environmental care creates opportunities for companies to apply green marketing and to increase sales. Green marketing becomes an alternative strategy helps the company's image, adds value to the company's business, even consumers demand green choices and will to pay higher prices. The marketing strategy includes the company's external and internal factors. The marketing mix strategy is the basic idea and generic function of marketing which consists of product, price, place, and promotion elements to shape the occurrence of sales. Developing the concept of green marketing mix (green marketing mix) is inseparable from the traditional 4P concepts (product, price, place, promotion), except a number of additional component are closely related to th...

Related Papers

Green marketing refers to the process of selling products or services based on their environmental benefits such as the contribution to reducing environmental pollution and prevention of degradation. Such products are manufactured, packaged and marketed in an environmental friendly manner and process. Green marketing has emerged as one of the most important marketing techniques in the present global business environment. Consumers now have worries about the future environment of the world and as a result of this mostly prefer environment friendly products. In recognition of these concerns of consumers, companies have started to make their marketing strategies more appealing by offering environment-friendly products and promotions. Combination of appropriate marketing tools along with products and packaging can have a multiplier and accelerating effect in the conservation efforts. Today most of the companies adapt green marketing as environment protection tool. Present paper aims to analyze green marketing as Environment Protection Tools: Questionnaire was designed and piloted on predetermined sample of consumers of Dehradun with the motives of analyzing consumer behavior and their green consciousness in their purchase pattern. Study reveals that Green marketing is a materialization of a new market. The customers are becoming more eco-responsible and customers are concerned about environmental issues in new market. Different suggestions have been drawn out for consideration and implementation by green product marketing companies. It has been established through the present research that green marketing can have a profound influence in Green marketing efforts.

Swati Pathak

Mayank Bhatia

Sustainability

Rasa Grigolienė

The concept of green marketing is not just a passing trend but a crucial aspect in the development of new products, contributing to the foundation of a sustainable environment. By utilizing green marketing, companies endeavor to protect the environment in the best possible way, to have as few harmful effects as possible, and to promote consumer awareness of the environment, thus contributing to sustainable development goals. For the successful application and utilization of green marketing, companies must excel at recognizing the determining elements and means of green marketing. This article aims to classify and summarize the theoretical insights of researchers in the field of green marketing from the perspective of the elements of the marketing mix. The theoretical framework analysis considers each 4P element of green marketing individually, emphasizing the elements and means of 4P functions and examining the impact these elements and means have on consumer attitudes and behavior....

Journal of Sustainable Development Studies

Linus Osuagwu

Green marketing has attracted some attention in recent times. The general interests in green marketing have been as a result of the increased concerns related to the inefficient use of resources, the poor management of wastes, the high use of fossil fuels, the increase in the emission of greenhouse gases, in addition to relevant pressures from consumers, clients, civil society organizations and governments, among others. Green marketing is an important strand of green business, which is concerned with reducing the impact of business practices on elements of the environment. It, specifically, focuses on reducing the adverse impact of marketing practices on the environment via such traditional marketing activities as product designing, producing product, product packaging, product labelling, product promotion, product distribution, and consuming goods and services that are friendly to the environment. It entails certain broad marketing issues such as product planning, processing, production, promotion, distribution, in addition to protective interest in people, society and planet which are designed by an organization to show its objective of reducing the adverse effect on the environment of its marketing activities. This paper conceptualizes the green marketing construct, presents some of its practices and challenges, and suggests research direction (with a research instrument) for investigating the construct in different organizational and environmental settings.

Business and Management Studies

Hatice Yaşar

Nowadays, businesses are aware that they cannot carry on without being aware of environmental problems. Businesses have to take environmental aspects of all activities in their business strategies and long-term plans. Those environmental activities and green marketing are started to be taken into consideration by so many businesses. In this study, green marketing is examined.

Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development

Petra Pártlová

Green marketing is possibly the newest type of marketing. Recently, it has also been the most discussed one by organizations, companies and even states. Green marketing tries to produce, promote and recycle products that are friendly to the environment. Green marketing is a global concern and it is going to have a better future. However, this type of marketing meets a few problems such as much effort to replace conventional products and a lack of confidence. Many companies produce and promote such products as much as possible. In spite of this, the public is still sceptical. The paper presents the theoretical important knowledge on green marketing, its definitions, customer behaviour formulas, and its potential.

Interal Res journa Managt Sci Tech

This Paper examines the notion of Green marketing and the challenges which are associated with different aspects of green marketing in the present Scenario. This world has witnessed much focus on economic progress but has also neglected environmental issues .This negligence today has led to huge losses in terms of climate change, biodiversity, environmental, degradation, rising green house gases, Loss of forests & water resources and so forth. This degrading situation of the environment has led to call by the society for taking responsibility to safe guard the planet. The Corporate , thus have shifted their focus from the single

This study aims to provide information on the concept of Green Marketing and its importance to the environment. It generally refers to the marketing of such products that are environment friendly. Green Marketing has gained a lot of importance in today's market. As the resources are scarce and the human wants are unlimited, the resources should be efficiently utilised to satisfy them. Since, people are becoming aware about the environment and their problems therefore, are not ready compromise with the products that they buy. And finally, the environment has penetrated our collective consciousness deeply enough to move a whole lot of people toward Green lifestyle changes. This study will further focus on the challenges in green marketing

RELATED PAPERS

Boletin De Malariologia Y Salud Ambiental

Mariapia Bevilacqua

Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition

Mitsuru Ueda

… of Clinical Nursing

Jeffrey Soar

Ana José Cóbar Carranza

Ciaran Murray

Teresa Wagner

Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética

Norton Nohama

Applied and Computational Mechanics

Naikoti Kishan

Pedro Changolo Manuel Chipindo

Luis Salinas

Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials

Daniel López

International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering

subasish mohapatra

Sorin Cimpean

European Journal of Public Health

Ricardo Izurieta

Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development

Ahmed Elgahed

Toshiyuki Shimosato

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Gracinda Costa

JAMA Surgery

Wei-Jei Lee

Psychoanalytic Dialogues

Janine de Peyer

Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

Nicholas Winograd

BİR GÜN HERKES ETİK HACKER OLUR

Rıdvan Kaya

UCLA文凭证书 加州大学洛杉矶分校文凭证书 klhjkgh

Cinco siglos de presencia franciscana en México

Rodrigo Martinez Baracs

Engenharia Agrícola

Manuel Borges

See More Documents Like This

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Retraction Note: Converging concepts of sustainability and supply chain networks: a systematic literature review approach

• Retraction Note
• Published: 01 April 2024

Cite this article

• Yumei Hou 1 , 2 ,
• Maryam Khokhar 3 ,
• Anshuman Sharma 4 ,
• James Bakul Sarkar 5 &
• Mohammad Amzad Hossain 5  

The Original Article was published on 30 January 2023

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Retraction Note: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:46120-46130

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25412-y

The Publisher has retracted this article in agreement with the Editor-in-Chief. An investigation by the Publisher found a number of articles, including this one, with a number of concerns, including but not limited to compromised peer-review process, inappropriate or irrelevant references, containing nonstandard phrases or not being in scope of the journal. Based on the investigation's findings the Publisher, in consultation with the Editor-in-Chief, therefore no longer has confidence in the results and conclusions of this article.

The authors have not stated whether they agree or disagree to this retraction.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Management College, Yangen University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China

Economics and Management School, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China

Department of Business Studies, Bahria Business School, Bahria University Karachi Campus, Karachi, Pakistan

Maryam Khokhar

Department of Marketing, College of Business Administration, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Anshuman Sharma

School of Business and Economics, United International University, Madani Avenue, Badda, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh

James Bakul Sarkar & Mohammad Amzad Hossain

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Khokhar .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Hou, Y., Khokhar, M., Sharma, A. et al. Retraction Note: Converging concepts of sustainability and supply chain networks: a systematic literature review approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33138-8

Download citation

Published : 01 April 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33138-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research