essay on the waste land

Home — Essay Samples — Literature — Books — The Waste Land

Essays on The Waste Land

When it comes to T.S. Eliot's iconic poem, The Waste Land, there are countless potential essay topics to explore. From analyzing its themes and characters to delving into its historical and cultural context, the possibilities are endless. In this guide, we'll discuss the importance of choosing the right topic, provide advice on selecting a compelling subject, and offer a detailed list of recommended essay topics to inspire you.

The Importance of Choosing the Right Topic

Choosing the right essay topic is crucial for a successful paper. A well-chosen topic not only allows you to demonstrate your understanding of the text but also gives you the opportunity to showcase your critical thinking skills and creativity. Additionally, a compelling topic will engage your readers and make your essay stand out.

When selecting a topic for your essay on The Waste Land, consider the following:

• Choose a topic that interests you and aligns with your strengths as a writer
• Consider the scope of the assignment and select a topic that can be effectively explored within the given parameters
• Look for a topic that allows for meaningful analysis and discussion, rather than simply summarizing the text
• Take into account the availability of credible sources and research material related to your chosen topic

Recommended The Waste Land Essay Topics

Here is a list of recommended essay topics for The Waste Land, divided by category:

• The theme of disillusionment in The Waste Land
• The portrayal of modernity in The Waste Land
• The theme of spiritual desolation in The Waste Land
• The representation of love and relationships in The Waste Land
• The theme of cultural decay in The Waste Land
• The theme of death and rebirth in The Waste Land
• The depiction of war and its aftermath in The Waste Land
• The theme of isolation and alienation in The Waste Land
• The theme of time and memory in The Waste Land
• The portrayal of religion and spirituality in The Waste Land

Symbols and Imagery

• The use of water as a symbol in The Waste Land
• The significance of the Fisher King in The Waste Land
• The role of the Tarot in The Waste Land
• The imagery of the wasteland in The Waste Land
• The use of fire and flame imagery in The Waste Land
• The symbolism of the hyacinth in The Waste Land
• The significance of the river Thames in The Waste Land
• The imagery of fertility and barrenness in The Waste Land
• The symbolism of the desert in The Waste Land
• The use of music and sound in The Waste Land

Characters and Narratives

• The role of Tiresias in The Waste Land
• The portrayal of Phlebas the Phoenician in The Waste Land
• The narrative of the burial of the dead in The Waste Land
• The character of Madame Sosostris in The Waste Land
• The portrayal of Lil and Albert in The Waste Land
• The narrative of the fire sermon in The Waste Land
• The character of the typist in The Waste Land
• The portrayal of A Game of Chess in The Waste Land
• The role of the Hanged Man in The Waste Land
• The character of Marie in The Waste Land

With these recommended essay topics, you have a wide range of options to choose from when crafting your analysis of The Waste Land. Whether you're interested in exploring its themes, characters, historical context, form, or reception, there's a topic to suit your interests and strengths as a writer. Good luck with your essay, and happy writing!

Interpreting The Allusions in 'The Waste Land' by T.s. Eliot

The role of imagery in t.s. eliot's 'the waste land', made-to-order essay as fast as you need it.

Each essay is customized to cater to your unique preferences

+ experts online

Exploring Death and Resurrection in T.s. Eliot’s The Waste Land

Isolation from urbanization in the waste land, modernist experimentation in "the waste land" poem by t. s. eliot, analysis of t.s. eliot's poem the waste land, let us write you an essay from scratch.

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Individual Resurrection from a Collective Death in The Wasteland

Asceticism and desire in "the waste land" by t. s. eliot, the centrality of tiresias in the waste land, dry, allusive, and ambiguous: a close reading of "the wasteland", get a personalized essay in under 3 hours.

Expert-written essays crafted with your exact needs in mind

Critical Response to T. S. Eliot’s Poem, The Waste Land

Analysis of the theme of god in the poetry of t. s. eliot, the manifestations and consequences of boredom in the waste land, invitation, violation, and automation: the deterioration of desire in t.s. eliot’s the waste land, from west to east: changing traditions in t. s. eliot's "the waste land", today’s environmental ‘waste land’: eliot’s prediction of the current ecological crisis, the unfortunate inferiority of women in the work of t.s. eliot, the issue of gender roles in the works of t.s. eliot and virginia woolf, the motif of alienation in the heart of darkness, the waste land, and the dead, interpretation of the waste land in terms of christian poetry, joyce, eliot, and auden: how the authors use recurring artistic ideas and themes.

December 1922

T. S. Eliot

The Narrator, Madame Sosostris, Stetson, The Rich Lady, Philomela, A Typist, Mr. Eugenides, Phlebas

1922, by T. S. Eliot

Modernist poetry

The poem is divided into five sections. The first, "The Burial of the Dead", introduces the diverse themes of disillusionment and despair. The second, "A Game of Chess", employs alternating narrations, in which vignettes of several characters address those themes experientially. "The Fire Sermon", the 3rd section, offers a philosophical meditation in relation to the imagery of death and views of self-denial in juxtaposition, influenced by Augustine of Hippo and Eastern religions. After a fourth section, "Death by Water", which includes a brief lyrical petition, the culminating fifth section, "What the Thunder Said", concludes with an image of judgment.

The basic theme of The Waste Land is the disillusionment of the post-war generation and sterility of the modern man. The poem expresses with great power the disillusionment and disgust of the period after World War I. The depiction of spiritual emptiness in the secularized city is not a simple contrast of the heroic past with the degraded present; it is rather a timeless, simultaneous awareness of moral grandeur and moral evil.

The poem combines the legend of the Holy Grail and the Fisher King with vignettes of contemporary British society. Eliot employs many literary and cultural allusions from the Western canon such as Ovid's Metamorphoses and Dante's Divine Comedy, as well as Shakespeare, Buddhism, and the Hindu Upanishads. The poem shifts between voices of satire and prophecy featuring abrupt and unannounced changes of speaker, location, and time and conjuring a vast and dissonant range of cultures and literatures.

The poem initially met with controversy as its complex and erudite style was alternately denounced for its obscurity and praised for its Modernism. It is considered one of the most influential works of the 20th century.

"April is the cruellest month" "I will show you fear in a handful of dust" “Winter kept us warm, covering Earth in forgetful snow”

Relevant topics

• The Crucible
• The Tell Tale Heart
• Frankenstein
• A Modest Proposal
• Consider The Lobster
• A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings
• Fast Food Nation
• A Poison Tree
• A Good Man Is Hard to Find

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

A Summary and Analysis of T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land

By Dr Oliver Tearle (Loughborough University)

The Waste Land , first published in 1922, is arguably the most important poem of the whole twentieth century. It remains a timely poem, even though its origins were very specifically the post-war Europe of 1918-22.

Written by T. S. Eliot, who was then beginning to make a name for himself following the publication (and modest success) of his first two volumes of poetry, The Waste Land has given rise to more critical analysis and scholarly interpretation than just about any other poem. Critics and readers are still arguing over what it means.

In this post, we plan to give a brief introduction to, and analysis of, The Waste Land in terms of its key themes and features. We will then zoom in and look at the individual five sections of the poem more closely in separate posts. (We say ‘brief introduction’ and ‘short analysis’, but even the shortest analysis of Eliot’s  The Waste Land  is going to require a longish essay.

Note: we have analysed some of the key quotations from  The Waste Land  in a separate post . We have also analysed some key themes of  The Waste Land   in a longer post.

Section-by-section summary

‘The Burial of the Dead’

This is the first of five sections that make up The Waste Land .  The section opens with the famous declaration that April is the cruellest month because it breeds lilacs out of a land that is dead, and that the winter snows were preferable because they covered this dead land, allowing us to forget what lay beneath. (We have analysed the famous opening line of the poem in more detail here .)

Then we have a countess, Marie, recalling how she used to stay at her cousin’s the archduke’s, and they went sledding. Another speaker talks of a mysterious shadow rising to meet us, and then we have a woman’s voice, describing herself as the Hyacinth girl.

The (presumably male) speaker who answers her seems to have lost all grip on reality when confronted with the woman coming out of the garden with her arms full of flowers and her hair wet.

Then we have a section involving Tarot cards, used to foretell the future, which are dealt out by the clairvoyante, Madame Sosostris. This first part of  The Waste Land  ends with a male speaker meeting Stetson, whom he fought alongside in the Battle of Mylae (one of the Punic Wars of ancient times).

He asks Stetson whether the corpse he planted in his garden has begun to sprout, returning us to the imagery from the beginning of the poem. You can read our discussion of ‘The Burial of the Dead’ here .

‘A Game of Chess’

Next, we have ‘A Game of Chess’, the second section. The chief focus of this section is two scenes involving women: the first an upper-class woman and the second a lower-class one. There is a suggestion that they are both trying to cope with husbands who have served in the recent war, but are also dealing with their own issues, too.

The section opens with a long and detailed description of the upper-class woman’s dressing room, where she is using perfumes and other products to make herself look and smell nice. Then we have a conversation between her and (we infer) her husband, where they fail to communicate meaningfully with each other, partly because the woman is nervous and jittery, and because there is a suggestion that the man is suffering from shell-shock or PTSD.

From this scene, we move to a pub in the East End of London, where a working-class woman, Lou, is talking to Bill and some of her other friends about her friend Lil, whose husband Albert has come back from the war, wanting to have sex with his wife again.

Lil’s numerous children are mentioned, and we are given a grim picture of poor Lil, who has grown prematurely old, partly as a result of the numerous pregnancies and partly because she has been using abortion pills. You can read our discussion of ‘A Game of Chess’ here .

‘The Fire Sermon’

The third section of The Waste Land focuses not on marriage (as was the case in the previous section) but on other sexual relationships.

The section opens with a euphemistic reference to nymphs (i.e. prostitutes) plying their trade on the banks of the Thames, and goes on to refer to Sweeney visiting Mrs Porter’s brothel, and an Australian drinking song about prostitutes.

There is also the rape of Philomela by her brother-in-law Tereus, a foreign merchant propositioning the male speaker to a dirty weekend down in Brighton with him, and – most famously – a typist and a young estate agent’s clerk engaging in mechanical lovemaking (although love is largely absent here).

We then have several different female voices, the supposed Thames-daughters (as Eliot’s notes call them), telling us their stories of how they were undone by men. You can read our discussion of ‘The Fire Sermon’ here.

‘Death by Water’

This fourth section is a breath of fresh air (as it were) after the longer third section: a short lyric of just ten lines, it focuses on Phlebas, a Phoenician tradesman from classical times, who has drowned at sea (the title of this section takes us back to the Tarot card in the first section of The Waste Land , which warned us to fear death by water and referred to a drowned Phoenician sailor).

You can read our discussion of ‘Death by Water’ here .

‘What the Thunder Said’

The fifth and final section of  The Waste Land , ‘What the Thunder Said’, is overwhelmingly written in unpunctuated, unrhymed, irregular free verse. It is as if the lack of water has led the speaker of ‘What the Thunder Said’, in his desire for water, to lapse into semi-coherent snatches of speech. We find ourselves in a dry land, among people undertaking a quest to find the Holy Grail (although we need to read Eliot’s notes to grasp this properly).

Much of this final section of the poem is about a desire for water: the waste land is a land of drought where little will grow. Water is needed to restore life to the earth, to return a sterile land to fertility. (Shades of the Fisher King myth here again.)

Along the way, in ll. 359-65, we get a weird digression which sees the speaker asking about a hallucinated third person (s)he imagines walking alongside his (her) travelling companion, a detail that was inspired, Eliot tells us in his notes, by one of Ernest Shackleton’s Antarctic expeditions, where one of the men suffered from the delusion that there was one more man among their number, an imagined extra person.

Shades of the Gothic are introduced here, which are echoed by the bats with the baby faces in the chapel. We are also in the realms of Arthurian myth here, and the Grail quest: the Chapel Perilous was the place, in Sir Thomas Malory’s  Le Morte d’Arthur , where Lancelot was tempted – as with ‘The Fire Sermon’, temptation re-emerges as a theme.

Can one remain spiritually pure and focused, or will the lure of the body become too strong? This section – and the poem – ends with the arrival of rain in a thunderstorm, where the DA sound of the thunderclap is interpreted in light of the Hindu Upanishads. You can read our discussion of ‘What the Thunder Said’ here.

How to analyse The Waste Land

A good place to start with an analysis of The Waste Land is to examine the importance of literary allusion. Eliot’s poem draws on a vast number of literary and religious texts and traditions. In addition to this, there is what is called the ‘mythic method’: Eliot’s use of a mythic narrative or structure.

He probably borrowed this idea from James Joyce, who had used it in his novel Ulysses , which was published in book form in 1922, the same year as The Waste Land , but which had been appearing in instalments in the Little Review for several years prior to that.

Eliot wrote an essay in praise of Joyce’s use of ancient myth, and borrowed this for his own poem – drawing on Arthurian legend (e.g. the Fisher King) and various other religious and literary traditions. The Fisher King myth, which helps to explain so much of the poem’s imagery and themes, is summed up by Pericles Lewis on Yale’s Modernisms site:

The Fisher King is impotent, his lands infertile and drought-stricken; one cause of this infertility is a crime, the rape of some maidens in the king’s court. Only the arrival of a pure-hearted stranger … permits the land to become fertile again.

This is the modern world: civilisation has been reduced to a ‘waste land’ and the land has lost its fertility and ability to bring forth life. Even the living seem to be suffering from some kind of spiritual wound. But how can we fix this society? By regaining spiritual and psychological enlightenment and making peace with our demons. But that’s easier said than done.

Final thoughts

How should we approach Eliot’s poetry and the question of what The Waste Land means? How can we analyse The Waste Land and discover its true meaning? Is there a true meaning? Eliot was often notoriously unhelpful at providing clarification or elucidation to his poems. His notes to The Waste Land – added as an afterthought to the original poem – tend to confuse the reader as much as they assist.

When Eliot invites us in one of the notes to see the entire poem as focalised through the figure of Tiresias (a man who is a mess of contradictions: a blind seer, a man with breasts), should we take him at his word? Or is this Eliot trying to suggest coherence and unity to a very fragmented poem, after the fact?

Similarly, Eliot later dismissed the poem as a personal ‘grouse’ against life – contrary to what a hundred analyses of The Waste Land argued, the poem didn’t pretend to speak for a whole generation.

So one thing to bear in mind is this: even in those parts of the poem where we may think we know where the meaning of the poem lies, there may be other things going on in the background which we are at best only partly aware of.

The best student edition of Eliot’s poem is The Waste Land (Norton Critical Editions) , which comes with a very helpful introduction, as well as contextual information and major critical responses to The Waste Land.

Readers looking for a more detailed discussion of Eliot’s poem, particularly in its context of modernist poetry of the 1920s, are advised to seek out Oliver Tearle’s study, The Great War, The Waste Land and the Modernist Long Poem .

24 thoughts on “A Summary and Analysis of T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land”

Reblogged this on O LADO ESCURO DA LUA .

As with the Four Quartets some background info is always welcome! Look forward to future enlightenment.

Thanks! I’ll have to do Four Quartets next :)

I am looking forward to future posts!! This gave me great insight in the world of TS Eliot! Thank you.

Thank you! Glad it was informative :)

I made the mistake of reading the manuscript as edited by Pound… Most confusing. Also, thank you for insight into the styles that motivated Eliot.

I love the Salvador Dali quote! :-)

Reblogged this on newauthoronline .

Sent from my iPod

• Pingback: A Short Analysis of T. S. Eliot’s ‘The Hippopotamus’ | Interesting Literature
• Pingback: read-the-poem-and-complete-the-discussion - expertnursingwriters
• Pingback: Reading discussion - Studyaffiliates.com
• Pingback: Reading discussion - Nursingmodules.com
• Pingback: reading-discussion-24 - expertnursingwriters
• Pingback: A Short Analysis of T. S. Eliot’s ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent’ – Interesting Literature
• Pingback: A Short Analysis of T. S. Eliot’s ‘Portrait of a Lady’ – Interesting Literature
• Pingback: The Meaning of ‘West End Girls’ by the Pet Shop Boys – Interesting Literature
• Pingback: The First Epic Poem: The Descent of Inanna – Interesting Literature
• Pingback: 10 of the Best Wendy Cope Poems Everyone Should Read – Interesting Literature
• Pingback: A Short Analysis of W. H. Auden’s ‘If I Could Tell You’ – Interesting Literature
• Pingback: 10 Classic Poems about Empire and Imperialism – Interesting Literature
• Pingback: 10 of the Best Poems about Classical Myth – Interesting Literature
• Pingback: 10 of the Best D. H. Lawrence Poems Everyone Should Read – Interesting Literature
• Pingback: 10 of the Best Poems about Cars – Interesting Literature

Comments are closed.

Discover more from Interesting Literature

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

The Waste Land Summary & Analysis by T. S. Eliot

• Line-by-Line Explanation & Analysis
• Poetic Devices
• Vocabulary & References
• Form, Meter, & Rhyme Scheme
• Line-by-Line Explanations

T. S. Eliot's "The Waste Land" is considered one of the most important poems of the 20th century, as well as a modernist masterpiece. A dramatic monologue that changes speakers, locations, and times throughout, "The Waste Land" draws on a dizzying array of literary, musical, historical, and popular cultural allusions in order to present the terror, futility, and alienation of modern life in the wake of World War I.

• Read the full text of “The Waste Land”

The Full Text of “The Waste Land”

                                  FOR EZRA POUND

                                IL MIGLIOR FABBRO

               I. The Burial of the Dead

1   April is the cruellest month, breeding

2 Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing

3 Memory and desire, stirring

4 Dull roots with spring rain.

5 Winter kept us warm, covering

6 Earth in forgetful snow, feeding

7 A little life with dried tubers.

8 Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee

9 With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade,

10 And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten,

11 And drank coffee, and talked for an hour.

12 Bin gar keine Russin, stamm’ aus Litauen, echt deutsch.

13 And when we were children, staying at the arch-duke’s,

14 My cousin’s, he took me out on a sled,

15 And I was frightened. He said, Marie,

16 Marie, hold on tight. And down we went.

17 In the mountains, there you feel free.

18 I read, much of the night, and go south in the winter.

19   What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow

20 Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man,

21 You cannot say, or guess, for you know only

22 A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,

23 And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,

24 And the dry stone no sound of water. Only

25 There is shadow under this red rock,

26 (Come in under the shadow of this red rock),

27 And I will show you something different from either

28 Your shadow at morning striding behind you

29 Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;

30 I will show you fear in a handful of dust.

31                       Frisch weht der Wind

32                        Der Heimat zu

33                        Mein Irisch Kind,

34                        Wo weilest du?

35 “You gave me hyacinths first a year ago;

36 “They called me the hyacinth girl.”

37 —Yet when we came back, late, from the Hyacinth garden,

38 Your arms full, and your hair wet, I could not

39 Speak, and my eyes failed, I was neither

40 Living nor dead, and I knew nothing,

41 Looking into the heart of light, the silence.

42 Oed’ und leer das Meer .

43   Madame Sosostris, famous clairvoyante,

44 Had a bad cold, nevertheless

45 Is known to be the wisest woman in Europe,

46 With a wicked pack of cards. Here, said she,

47 Is your card, the drowned Phoenician Sailor,

48 (Those are pearls that were his eyes. Look!)

49 Here is Belladonna, the Lady of the Rocks,

50 The lady of situations.

51 Here is the man with three staves, and here the Wheel,

52 And here is the one-eyed merchant, and this card,

53 Which is blank, is something he carries on his back,

54 Which I am forbidden to see. I do not find

55 The Hanged Man. Fear death by water.

56 I see crowds of people, walking round in a ring.

57 Thank you. If you see dear Mrs. Equitone,

58 Tell her I bring the horoscope myself:

59 One must be so careful these days.

60   Unreal City,

61 Under the brown fog of a winter dawn,

62 A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,

63 I had not thought death had undone so many.

64 Sighs, short and infrequent, were exhaled,

65 And each man fixed his eyes before his feet.

66 Flowed up the hill and down King William Street,

67 To where Saint Mary Woolnoth kept the hours

68 With a dead sound on the final stroke of nine.

69 There I saw one I knew, and stopped him, crying: “Stetson!

70 “You who were with me in the ships at Mylae!

71 “That corpse you planted last year in your garden,

72 “Has it begun to sprout? Will it bloom this year?

73 “Or has the sudden frost disturbed its bed?

74 “Oh keep the Dog far hence, that’s friend to men,

75 “Or with his nails he’ll dig it up again!

76 “You! hypocrite lecteur!—mon semblable,—mon frère!”

               II. A Game of Chess

77 The Chair she sat in, like a burnished throne,

78 Glowed on the marble, where the glass

79 Held up by standards wrought with fruited vines

80 From which a golden Cupidon peeped out

81 (Another hid his eyes behind his wing)

82 Doubled the flames of sevenbranched candelabra

83 Reflecting light upon the table as

84 The glitter of her jewels rose to meet it,

85 From satin cases poured in rich profusion;

86 In vials of ivory and coloured glass

87 Unstoppered, lurked her strange synthetic perfumes,

88 Unguent, powdered, or liquid—troubled, confused

89 And drowned the sense in odours; stirred by the air

90 That freshened from the window, these ascended

91 In fattening the prolonged candle-flames,

92 Flung their smoke into the laquearia,

93 Stirring the pattern on the coffered ceiling.

94 Huge sea-wood fed with copper

95 Burned green and orange, framed by the coloured stone,

96 In which sad light a carvéd dolphin swam.

97 Above the antique mantel was displayed

98 As though a window gave upon the sylvan scene

99 The change of Philomel, by the barbarous king

100 So rudely forced; yet there the nightingale

101 Filled all the desert with inviolable voice

102 And still she cried, and still the world pursues,

103 “Jug Jug” to dirty ears.

104 And other withered stumps of time

105 Were told upon the walls; staring forms

106 Leaned out, leaning, hushing the room enclosed.

107 Footsteps shuffled on the stair.

108 Under the firelight, under the brush, her hair

109 Spread out in fiery points

110 Glowed into words, then would be savagely still.

111   “My nerves are bad tonight. Yes, bad. Stay with me.

112 “Speak to me. Why do you never speak. Speak.

113   “What are you thinking of? What thinking? What?

114 “I never know what you are thinking. Think.”

115   I think we are in rats’ alley

116 Where the dead men lost their bones.

117   “What is that noise?”

118                           The wind under the door.

119 “What is that noise now? What is the wind doing?”

120                            Nothing again nothing.

121                                                         “Do

122 “You know nothing? Do you see nothing? Do you remember

123 “Nothing?”

124        I remember

125 Those are pearls that were his eyes.

126 “Are you alive, or not? Is there nothing in your head?”   

127                                                                            But

128 O O O O that Shakespeherian Rag—

129 It’s so elegant

130 So intelligent

131 “What shall I do now? What shall I do?”

132 “I shall rush out as I am, and walk the street

133 “With my hair down, so. What shall we do tomorrow?

134 “What shall we ever do?”

135                                                The hot water at ten.

136 And if it rains, a closed car at four.

137 And we shall play a game of chess,

138 Pressing lidless eyes and waiting for a knock upon the door.

139   When Lil’s husband got demobbed, I said—

140 I didn’t mince my words, I said to her myself,

141 HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME

142 Now Albert’s coming back, make yourself a bit smart.

143 He’ll want to know what you done with that money he gave you

144 To get yourself some teeth. He did, I was there.

145 You have them all out, Lil, and get a nice set,

146 He said, I swear, I can’t bear to look at you.

147 And no more can’t I, I said, and think of poor Albert,

148 He’s been in the army four years, he wants a good time,

149 And if you don’t give it him, there’s others will, I said.

150 Oh is there, she said. Something o’ that, I said.

151 Then I’ll know who to thank, she said, and give me a straight look.

152 HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME

153 If you don’t like it you can get on with it, I said.

154 Others can pick and choose if you can’t.

155 But if Albert makes off, it won’t be for lack of telling.

156 You ought to be ashamed, I said, to look so antique.

157 (And her only thirty-one.)

158 I can’t help it, she said, pulling a long face,

159 It’s them pills I took, to bring it off, she said.

160 (She’s had five already, and nearly died of young George.)

161 The chemist said it would be all right, but I’ve never been the same.

162 You  are  a proper fool, I said.

163 Well, if Albert won’t leave you alone, there it is, I said,

164 What you get married for if you don’t want children?

165 HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME

166 Well, that Sunday Albert was home, they had a hot gammon,

167 And they asked me in to dinner, to get the beauty of it hot—

168 HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME

169 HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME

170 Goonight Bill. Goonight Lou. Goonight May. Goonight.

171 Ta ta. Goonight. Goonight.

172 Good night, ladies, good night, sweet ladies, good night, good night.

               III. The Fire Sermon

173   The river’s tent is broken: the last fingers of leaf

174 Clutch and sink into the wet bank. The wind

175 Crosses the brown land, unheard. The nymphs are departed.

176 Sweet Thames, run softly, till I end my song.

177 The river bears no empty bottles, sandwich papers,

178 Silk handkerchiefs, cardboard boxes, cigarette ends

179 Or other testimony of summer nights. The nymphs are departed.

180 And their friends, the loitering heirs of city directors;

181 Departed, have left no addresses.

182 By the waters of Leman I sat down and wept . . .

183 Sweet Thames, run softly till I end my song,

184 Sweet Thames, run softly, for I speak not loud or long.

185 But at my back in a cold blast I hear

186 The rattle of the bones, and chuckle spread from ear to ear.

187 A rat crept softly through the vegetation

188 Dragging its slimy belly on the bank

189 While I was fishing in the dull canal

190 On a winter evening round behind the gashouse

191 Musing upon the king my brother’s wreck

192 And on the king my father’s death before him.

193 White bodies naked on the low damp ground

194 And bones cast in a little low dry garret,

195 Rattled by the rat’s foot only, year to year.

196 But at my back from time to time I hear

197 The sound of horns and motors, which shall bring

198 Sweeney to Mrs. Porter in the spring.

199 O the moon shone bright on Mrs. Porter

200 And on her daughter

201 They wash their feet in soda water

202 Et O ces voix d’enfants, chantant dans la coupole!

203 Twit twit twit

204 Jug jug jug jug jug jug

205 So rudely forc’d.

207 Unreal City

208 Under the brown fog of a winter noon

209 Mr. Eugenides, the Smyrna merchant

210 Unshaven, with a pocket full of currants

211 C.i.f. London: documents at sight,

212 Asked me in demotic French

213 To luncheon at the Cannon Street Hotel

214 Followed by a weekend at the Metropole.

215 At the violet hour, when the eyes and back

216 Turn upward from the desk, when the human engine waits

217 Like a taxi throbbing waiting,

218 I Tiresias, though blind, throbbing between two lives,

219 Old man with wrinkled female breasts, can see

220 At the violet hour, the evening hour that strives

221 Homeward, and brings the sailor home from sea,

222 The typist home at teatime, clears her breakfast, lights

223 Her stove, and lays out food in tins.

224 Out of the window perilously spread

225 Her drying combinations touched by the sun’s last rays,

226 On the divan are piled (at night her bed)

227 Stockings, slippers, camisoles, and stays.

228 I Tiresias, old man with wrinkled dugs

229 Perceived the scene, and foretold the rest—

230 I too awaited the expected guest.

231 He, the young man carbuncular, arrives,

232 A small house agent’s clerk, with one bold stare,

233 One of the low on whom assurance sits

234 As a silk hat on a Bradford millionaire.

235 The time is now propitious, as he guesses,

236 The meal is ended, she is bored and tired,

237 Endeavours to engage her in caresses

238 Which still are unreproved, if undesired.

239 Flushed and decided, he assaults at once;

240 Exploring hands encounter no defence;

241 His vanity requires no response,

242 And makes a welcome of indifference.

243 (And I Tiresias have foresuffered all

244 Enacted on this same divan or bed;

245 I who have sat by Thebes below the wall

246 And walked among the lowest of the dead.)

247 Bestows one final patronising kiss,

248 And gropes his way, finding the stairs unlit . . .

249 She turns and looks a moment in the glass,

250 Hardly aware of her departed lover;

251 Her brain allows one half-formed thought to pass:

252 “Well now that’s done: and I’m glad it’s over.”

253 When lovely woman stoops to folly and

254 Paces about her room again, alone,

255 She smoothes her hair with automatic hand,

256 And puts a record on the gramophone.

257 “This music crept by me upon the waters”

258 And along the Strand, up Queen Victoria Street.

259 O City city, I can sometimes hear

260 Beside a public bar in Lower Thames Street,

261 The pleasant whining of a mandoline

262 And a clatter and a chatter from within

263 Where fishmen lounge at noon: where the walls

264 Of Magnus Martyr hold

265 Inexplicable splendour of Ionian white and gold.

266                The river sweats

267                Oil and tar

268                The barges drift

269                With the turning tide

270                Red sails

271                Wide

272                To leeward, swing on the heavy spar.

273                The barges wash

274                Drifting logs

275                Down Greenwich reach

276                Past the Isle of Dogs.

277                                  Weialala leia

278                                  Wallala leialala

279                Elizabeth and Leicester

280                Beating oars

281                The stern was formed

282                A gilded shell

283                Red and gold

284                The brisk swell

285                Rippled both shores

286                Southwest wind

287                Carried down stream

288                The peal of bells

289                White towers

290                                 Weialala leia

291                                 Wallala leialala

292 “Trams and dusty trees.

293 Highbury bore me. Richmond and Kew

294 Undid me. By Richmond I raised my knees

295 Supine on the floor of a narrow canoe.”

296 “My feet are at Moorgate, and my heart

297 Under my feet. After the event

298 He wept. He promised a ‘new start.’

299 I made no comment. What should I resent?”

300 “On Margate Sands.

301 I can connect

302 Nothing with nothing.

303 The broken fingernails of dirty hands.

304 My people humble people who expect

305 Nothing.”

306                        la la

307 To Carthage then I came

308 Burning burning burning burning

309 O Lord Thou pluckest me out

310 O Lord Thou pluckest

311 burning

               IV. Death by Water

312 Phlebas the Phoenician, a fortnight dead,

313 Forgot the cry of gulls, and the deep sea swell

314 And the profit and loss.

315                                    A current under sea

316 Picked his bones in whispers. As he rose and fell

317 He passed the stages of his age and youth

318 Entering the whirlpool.

319                                    Gentile or Jew

320 O you who turn the wheel and look to windward,

321 Consider Phlebas, who was once handsome and tall as you.

               V. What the Thunder Said

322   After the torchlight red on sweaty faces

323 After the frosty silence in the gardens

324 After the agony in stony places

325 The shouting and the crying

326 Prison and palace and reverberation

327 Of thunder of spring over distant mountains

328 He who was living is now dead

329 We who were living are now dying

330 With a little patience

331 Here is no water but only rock

332 Rock and no water and the sandy road

333 The road winding above among the mountains

334 Which are mountains of rock without water

335 If there were water we should stop and drink

336 Amongst the rock one cannot stop or think

337 Sweat is dry and feet are in the sand

338 If there were only water amongst the rock

339 Dead mountain mouth of carious teeth that cannot spit

340 Here one can neither stand nor lie nor sit

341 There is not even silence in the mountains

342 But dry sterile thunder without rain

343 There is not even solitude in the mountains

344 But red sullen faces sneer and snarl

345 From doors of mudcracked houses

346                                       If there were water

347    And no rock

348    If there were rock

349    And also water

350    And water

351    A spring

352    A pool among the rock

353    If there were the sound of water only

354    Not the cicada

355    And dry grass singing

356    But sound of water over a rock

357    Where the hermit-thrush sings in the pine trees

358    Drip drop drip drop drop drop drop

359    But there is no water

360 Who is the third who walks always beside you?

361 When I count, there are only you and I together

362 But when I look ahead up the white road

363 There is always another one walking beside you

364 Gliding wrapt in a brown mantle, hooded

365 I do not know whether a man or a woman

366 —But who is that on the other side of you?

367 What is that sound high in the air

368 Murmur of maternal lamentation

369 Who are those hooded hordes swarming

370 Over endless plains, stumbling in cracked earth

371 Ringed by the flat horizon only

372 What is the city over the mountains

373 Cracks and reforms and bursts in the violet air

374 Falling towers

375 Jerusalem Athens Alexandria

376 Vienna London

378 A woman drew her long black hair out tight

379 And fiddled whisper music on those strings

380 And bats with baby faces in the violet light

381 Whistled, and beat their wings

382 And crawled head downward down a blackened wall

383 And upside down in air were towers

384 Tolling reminiscent bells, that kept the hours

385 And voices singing out of empty cisterns and exhausted wells.

386 In this decayed hole among the mountains

387 In the faint moonlight, the grass is singing

388 Over the tumbled graves, about the chapel

389 There is the empty chapel, only the wind’s home.

390 It has no windows, and the door swings,

391 Dry bones can harm no one.

392 Only a cock stood on the rooftree

393 Co co rico co co rico

394 In a flash of lightning. Then a damp gust

395 Bringing rain

396 Ganga was sunken, and the limp leaves

397 Waited for rain, while the black clouds

398 Gathered far distant, over Himavant.

399 The jungle crouched, humped in silence.

400 Then spoke the thunder

402 Datta:  what have we given?

403 My friend, blood shaking my heart

404 The awful daring of a moment’s surrender

405 Which an age of prudence can never retract

406 By this, and this only, we have existed

407 Which is not to be found in our obituaries

408 Or in memories draped by the beneficent spider

409 Or under seals broken by the lean solicitor

410 In our empty rooms

412 Dayadhvam:  I have heard the key

413 Turn in the door once and turn once only

414 We think of the key, each in his prison

415 Thinking of the key, each confirms a prison

416 Only at nightfall, aethereal rumours

417 Revive for a moment a broken Coriolanus

419 Damyata:  The boat responded

420 Gaily, to the hand expert with sail and oar

421 The sea was calm, your heart would have responded

422 Gaily, when invited, beating obedient

423 To controlling hands

424                                     I sat upon the shore

425 Fishing, with the arid plain behind me

426 Shall I at least set my lands in order?

427 London Bridge is falling down falling down falling down

428 Poi s’ascose nel foco che gli affina

429 Quando fiam uti chelidon —O swallow swallow

430 Le Prince d’Aquitaine à la tour abolie

431 These fragments I have shored against my ruins

432 Why then Ile fit you. Hieronymo’s mad againe.

433 Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata.

434                   Shantih     shantih     shantih

“The Waste Land” Summary

“the waste land” themes.

The Brokenness and Isolation of Modern Life

• See where this theme is active in the poem.

Death and Rebirth

Religion, Spirituality, and Nihilism

Sex, Lust, and Impotence

Memory and the past, line-by-line explanation & analysis of “the waste land”, before line 1, lines 1-7.

                                  FOR EZRA POUND                                 IL MIGLIOR FABBRO                I. The Burial of the Dead   April is the cruellest month, breeding Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing Memory and desire, stirring Dull roots with spring rain. Winter kept us warm, covering Earth in forgetful snow, feeding A little life with dried tubers.

Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade, And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten, And drank coffee, and talked for an hour. Bin gar keine Russin, stamm’ aus Litauen, echt deutsch. And when we were children, staying at the arch-duke’s, My cousin’s, he took me out on a sled, And I was frightened. He said, Marie, Marie, hold on tight. And down we went. In the mountains, there you feel free. I read, much of the night, and go south in the winter.

Lines 19-30

What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, You cannot say, or guess, for you know only A heap of broken images, where the sun beats, And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief, And the dry stone no sound of water. Only There is shadow under this red rock, (Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you; I will show you fear in a handful of dust.

Lines 31-42

  Frisch weht der Wind                        Der Heimat zu                        Mein Irisch Kind,                        Wo weilest du? “You gave me hyacinths first a year ago; “They called me the hyacinth girl.” —Yet when we came back, late, from the Hyacinth garden, Your arms full, and your hair wet, I could not Speak, and my eyes failed, I was neither Living nor dead, and I knew nothing, Looking into the heart of light, the silence. Oed’ und leer das Meer .

Lines 43-59

Madame Sosostris, famous clairvoyante, Had a bad cold, nevertheless Is known to be the wisest woman in Europe, With a wicked pack of cards. Here, said she, Is your card, the drowned Phoenician Sailor, (Those are pearls that were his eyes. Look!) Here is Belladonna, the Lady of the Rocks, The lady of situations. Here is the man with three staves, and here the Wheel, And here is the one-eyed merchant, and this card, Which is blank, is something he carries on his back, Which I am forbidden to see. I do not find The Hanged Man. Fear death by water. I see crowds of people, walking round in a ring. Thank you. If you see dear Mrs. Equitone, Tell her I bring the horoscope myself: One must be so careful these days.

Lines 60-76

Unreal City, Under the brown fog of a winter dawn, A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many, I had not thought death had undone so many. Sighs, short and infrequent, were exhaled, And each man fixed his eyes before his feet. Flowed up the hill and down King William Street, To where Saint Mary Woolnoth kept the hours With a dead sound on the final stroke of nine. There I saw one I knew, and stopped him, crying: “Stetson! “You who were with me in the ships at Mylae! “That corpse you planted last year in your garden, “Has it begun to sprout? Will it bloom this year? “Or has the sudden frost disturbed its bed? “Oh keep the Dog far hence, that’s friend to men, “Or with his nails he’ll dig it up again! “You! hypocrite lecteur!—mon semblable,—mon frère!”

Between Lines 76-77, Lines 77-96

   II. A Game of Chess The Chair she sat in, like a burnished throne, Glowed on the marble, where the glass Held up by standards wrought with fruited vines From which a golden Cupidon peeped out (Another hid his eyes behind his wing) Doubled the flames of sevenbranched candelabra Reflecting light upon the table as The glitter of her jewels rose to meet it, From satin cases poured in rich profusion; In vials of ivory and coloured glass Unstoppered, lurked her strange synthetic perfumes, Unguent, powdered, or liquid—troubled, confused And drowned the sense in odours; stirred by the air That freshened from the window, these ascended In fattening the prolonged candle-flames, Flung their smoke into the laquearia, Stirring the pattern on the coffered ceiling. Huge sea-wood fed with copper Burned green and orange, framed by the coloured stone, In which sad light a carvéd dolphin swam.

Lines 97-105

Above the antique mantel was displayed As though a window gave upon the sylvan scene The change of Philomel, by the barbarous king So rudely forced; yet there the nightingale Filled all the desert with inviolable voice And still she cried, and still the world pursues, “Jug Jug” to dirty ears. And other withered stumps of time Were told upon the walls;

Lines 104-116

And other withered stumps of time Were told upon the walls; staring forms Leaned out, leaning, hushing the room enclosed. Footsteps shuffled on the stair. Under the firelight, under the brush, her hair Spread out in fiery points Glowed into words, then would be savagely still.   “My nerves are bad tonight. Yes, bad. Stay with me. “Speak to me. Why do you never speak. Speak.   “What are you thinking of? What thinking? What? “I never know what you are thinking. Think.”   I think we are in rats’ alley Where the dead men lost their bones.

Lines 117-139

“What is that noise?”                           The wind under the door. “What is that noise now? What is the wind doing?”                            Nothing again nothing.                                                         “Do “You know nothing? Do you see nothing? Do you remember “Nothing?”        I remember Those are pearls that were his eyes. “Are you alive, or not? Is there nothing in your head?”                                                                                          But O O O O that Shakespeherian Rag— It’s so elegant So intelligent “What shall I do now? What shall I do?” “I shall rush out as I am, and walk the street “With my hair down, so. What shall we do tomorrow? “What shall we ever do?”                                                The hot water at ten. And if it rains, a closed car at four. And we shall play a game of chess, Pressing lidless eyes and waiting for a knock upon the door.

Lines 140-173

When Lil’s husband got demobbed, I said— I didn’t mince my words, I said to her myself, HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME Now Albert’s coming back, make yourself a bit smart. He’ll want to know what you done with that money he gave you To get yourself some teeth. He did, I was there. You have them all out, Lil, and get a nice set, He said, I swear, I can’t bear to look at you. And no more can’t I, I said, and think of poor Albert, He’s been in the army four years, he wants a good time, And if you don’t give it him, there’s others will, I said. Oh is there, she said. Something o’ that, I said. Then I’ll know who to thank, she said, and give me a straight look. HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME If you don’t like it you can get on with it, I said. Others can pick and choose if you can’t. But if Albert makes off, it won’t be for lack of telling. You ought to be ashamed, I said, to look so antique. (And her only thirty-one.) I can’t help it, she said, pulling a long face, It’s them pills I took, to bring it off, she said. (She’s had five already, and nearly died of young George.) The chemist said it would be all right, but I’ve never been the same. You  are  a proper fool, I said. Well, if Albert won’t leave you alone, there it is, I said, What you get married for if you don’t want children? HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME Well, that Sunday Albert was home, they had a hot gammon, And they asked me in to dinner, to get the beauty of it hot— HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME Goonight Bill. Goonight Lou. Goonight May. Goonight. Ta ta. Goonight. Goonight. Good night, ladies, good night, sweet ladies, good night, good night.

Between Lines 173-174, Lines 174-187

      III. The Fire Sermon   The river’s tent is broken: the last fingers of leaf Clutch and sink into the wet bank. The wind Crosses the brown land, unheard. The nymphs are departed. Sweet Thames, run softly, till I end my song. The river bears no empty bottles, sandwich papers, Silk handkerchiefs, cardboard boxes, cigarette ends Or other testimony of summer nights. The nymphs are departed. And their friends, the loitering heirs of city directors; Departed, have left no addresses. By the waters of Leman I sat down and wept . . . Sweet Thames, run softly till I end my song, Sweet Thames, run softly, for I speak not loud or long. But at my back in a cold blast I hear The rattle of the bones, and chuckle spread from ear to ear.

Lines 188-203

A rat crept softly through the vegetation Dragging its slimy belly on the bank While I was fishing in the dull canal On a winter evening round behind the gashouse Musing upon the king my brother’s wreck And on the king my father’s death before him. White bodies naked on the low damp ground And bones cast in a little low dry garret, Rattled by the rat’s foot only, year to year. But at my back from time to time I hear The sound of horns and motors, which shall bring Sweeney to Mrs. Porter in the spring. O the moon shone bright on Mrs. Porter And on her daughter They wash their feet in soda water Et O ces voix d’enfants, chantant dans la coupole!

Lines 204-215

Twit twit twit Jug jug jug jug jug jug So rudely forc’d. Tereu Unreal City Under the brown fog of a winter noon Mr. Eugenides, the Smyrna merchant Unshaven, with a pocket full of currants C.i.f. London: documents at sight, Asked me in demotic French To luncheon at the Cannon Street Hotel Followed by a weekend at the Metropole.

Lines 216-231

At the violet hour, when the eyes and back Turn upward from the desk, when the human engine waits Like a taxi throbbing waiting, I Tiresias, though blind, throbbing between two lives, Old man with wrinkled female breasts, can see At the violet hour, the evening hour that strives Homeward, and brings the sailor home from sea, The typist home at teatime, clears her breakfast, lights Her stove, and lays out food in tins. Out of the window perilously spread Her drying combinations touched by the sun’s last rays, On the divan are piled (at night her bed) Stockings, slippers, camisoles, and stays. I Tiresias, old man with wrinkled dugs Perceived the scene, and foretold the rest— I too awaited the expected guest.

Lines 232-257

He, the young man carbuncular, arrives, A small house agent’s clerk, with one bold stare, One of the low on whom assurance sits As a silk hat on a Bradford millionaire. The time is now propitious, as he guesses, The meal is ended, she is bored and tired, Endeavours to engage her in caresses Which still are unreproved, if undesired. Flushed and decided, he assaults at once; Exploring hands encounter no defence; His vanity requires no response, And makes a welcome of indifference. (And I Tiresias have foresuffered all Enacted on this same divan or bed; I who have sat by Thebes below the wall And walked among the lowest of the dead.) Bestows one final patronising kiss, And gropes his way, finding the stairs unlit . . . She turns and looks a moment in the glass, Hardly aware of her departed lover; Her brain allows one half-formed thought to pass: “Well now that’s done: and I’m glad it’s over.” When lovely woman stoops to folly and Paces about her room again, alone, She smoothes her hair with automatic hand, And puts a record on the gramophone.

Lines 258-266

“This music crept by me upon the waters” And along the Strand, up Queen Victoria Street. O City city, I can sometimes hear Beside a public bar in Lower Thames Street, The pleasant whining of a mandoline And a clatter and a chatter from within Where fishmen lounge at noon: where the walls Of Magnus Martyr hold Inexplicable splendour of Ionian white and gold.

Lines 267-292

               The river sweats                Oil and tar                The barges drift                With the turning tide                Red sails                Wide                To leeward, swing on the heavy spar.                The barges wash                Drifting logs                Down Greenwich reach                Past the Isle of Dogs.                                  Weialala leia                                  Wallala leialala                Elizabeth and Leicester                Beating oars                The stern was formed                A gilded shell                Red and gold                The brisk swell                Rippled both shores                Southwest wind                Carried down stream                The peal of bells                White towers                                 Weialala leia                                 Wallala leialala

Lines 293-312

“Trams and dusty trees. Highbury bore me. Richmond and Kew Undid me. By Richmond I raised my knees Supine on the floor of a narrow canoe.” “My feet are at Moorgate, and my heart Under my feet. After the event He wept. He promised a ‘new start.’ I made no comment. What should I resent?” “On Margate Sands. I can connect Nothing with nothing. The broken fingernails of dirty hands. My people humble people who expect Nothing.”                        la la To Carthage then I came Burning burning burning burning O Lord Thou pluckest me out O Lord Thou pluckest burning

Between Lines 312-313, Lines 313-322

       IV. Death by Water Phlebas the Phoenician, a fortnight dead, Forgot the cry of gulls, and the deep sea swell And the profit and loss.                                    A current under sea Picked his bones in whispers. As he rose and fell He passed the stages of his age and youth Entering the whirlpool.                                    Gentile or Jew O you who turn the wheel and look to windward, Consider Phlebas, who was once handsome and tall as you.

Between Lines 322-323, Lines 323-331

        V. What the Thunder Said   After the torchlight red on sweaty faces After the frosty silence in the gardens After the agony in stony places The shouting and the crying Prison and palace and reverberation Of thunder of spring over distant mountains He who was living is now dead We who were living are now dying With a little patience

Lines 332-360

Here is no water but only rock Rock and no water and the sandy road The road winding above among the mountains Which are mountains of rock without water If there were water we should stop and drink Amongst the rock one cannot stop or think Sweat is dry and feet are in the sand If there were only water amongst the rock Dead mountain mouth of carious teeth that cannot spit Here one can neither stand nor lie nor sit There is not even silence in the mountains But dry sterile thunder without rain There is not even solitude in the mountains But red sullen faces sneer and snarl From doors of mudcracked houses                                       If there were water    And no rock    If there were rock    And also water    And water    A spring    A pool among the rock    If there were the sound of water only    Not the cicada    And dry grass singing    But sound of water over a rock    Where the hermit-thrush sings in the pine trees    Drip drop drip drop drop drop drop    But there is no water

Lines 361-367

Who is the third who walks always beside you? When I count, there are only you and I together But when I look ahead up the white road There is always another one walking beside you Gliding wrapt in a brown mantle, hooded I do not know whether a man or a woman —But who is that on the other side of you?

Lines 368-386

What is that sound high in the air Murmur of maternal lamentation Who are those hooded hordes swarming Over endless plains, stumbling in cracked earth Ringed by the flat horizon only What is the city over the mountains Cracks and reforms and bursts in the violet air Falling towers Jerusalem Athens Alexandria Vienna London Unreal A woman drew her long black hair out tight And fiddled whisper music on those strings And bats with baby faces in the violet light Whistled, and beat their wings And crawled head downward down a blackened wall And upside down in air were towers Tolling reminiscent bells, that kept the hours And voices singing out of empty cisterns and exhausted wells.

Lines 387-396

In this decayed hole among the mountains In the faint moonlight, the grass is singing Over the tumbled graves, about the chapel There is the empty chapel, only the wind’s home. It has no windows, and the door swings, Dry bones can harm no one. Only a cock stood on the rooftree Co co rico co co rico In a flash of lightning. Then a damp gust Bringing rain

Lines 397-424

Ganga was sunken, and the limp leaves Waited for rain, while the black clouds Gathered far distant, over Himavant. The jungle crouched, humped in silence. Then spoke the thunder DA Datta:  what have we given? My friend, blood shaking my heart The awful daring of a moment’s surrender Which an age of prudence can never retract By this, and this only, we have existed Which is not to be found in our obituaries Or in memories draped by the beneficent spider Or under seals broken by the lean solicitor In our empty rooms DA Dayadhvam:  I have heard the key Turn in the door once and turn once only We think of the key, each in his prison Thinking of the key, each confirms a prison Only at nightfall, aethereal rumours Revive for a moment a broken Coriolanus DA Damyata:  The boat responded Gaily, to the hand expert with sail and oar The sea was calm, your heart would have responded Gaily, when invited, beating obedient To controlling hands

Lines 425-435

   I sat upon the shore Fishing, with the arid plain behind me Shall I at least set my lands in order? London Bridge is falling down falling down falling down Poi s’ascose nel foco che gli affina Quando fiam uti chelidon —O swallow swallow Le Prince d’Aquitaine à la tour abolie These fragments I have shored against my ruins Why then Ile fit you. Hieronymo’s mad againe. Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata.                   Shantih     shantih     shantih

“The Waste Land” Symbols

• See where this symbol appears in the poem.

Tarot Cards

Music and Singing

The Change of Philomel

“the waste land” poetic devices & figurative language.

• See where this poetic device appears in the poem.

Alliteration

Anachronism, extended metaphor, onomatopoeia, personification, stream of consciousness, “the waste land” vocabulary.

Select any word below to get its definition in the context of the poem. The words are listed in the order in which they appear in the poem.

• Starnbergersee
• Bin gar keine Russin, stamm’ aus Litauen, echt deutsch
• Frisch weht der Wind/ Der Heimat zu/ Mein Irisch Kind,/ Wo weilest du?
• Oed’ und leer das Meer
• Madame Sosostris
• Clairvoyante
• The drowned Phoenician Sailor
• Belladonna, the Lady of the Rocks
• The Hanged Man
• Hypocrite lecteur!—mon semblable,—mon frère
• Shakespeherian Rag
• HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME
• To bring it off
• By the waters of Leman
• Et O ces voix d’enfants, chantant dans la coupole!
• C.i.f. London
• Combinations
• Camisoles, and stays
• Carbuncular
• Bradford millionaire
• Indifference
• Foresuffered
• Patronising
• “This music crept by me upon the waters”
• Magnus Martyr
• Inexplicable
• Greenwich / Isle of Dogs
• Weialala leia / Wallala leialala
• Elizabeth and Leicester
• Highbury, Richmond, and Kew
• To Carthage then I came
• Reverberation
• Lamentation
• Reminiscent
• Datta, Dayadhvam, Damyatta
• Poi s’ascose nel foco che gli affina
• Quando fiam uti chelidon
• Le Prince d’Aquitaine à la tour abolie
• Why then Ile fit you. Hieronymo’s mad againe.
• See where this vocabulary word appears in the poem.

Form, Meter, & Rhyme Scheme of “The Waste Land”

Rhyme scheme, “the waste land” speaker, “the waste land” setting, literary and historical context of “the waste land”, more “the waste land” resources, external resources.

"The Waste Land," With Footnotes — This hyperlinked version of "The Waste Land" includes Eliot's original footnotes, as well as additional material unpacking the poem's many (many, many) allusions.

T. S. Eliot's Reading — Listen to a recording of T. S. Eliot reading "The Waste Land" out loud.

Eliot's Life Story — An in-depth biography and analysis of this groundbreaking poet and his career.

The Fisher King and "The Waste Land" — Learn more about the connection between "The Waste Land" and the legends of the Fisher King and Holy Grail.

LitCharts on Other Poems by T. S. Eliot

Four Quartets: Burnt Norton

Journey of the Magi

La Figlia Che Piange

Morning at the Window

Portrait of a Lady

Rhapsody on a Windy Night

The Hollow Men

The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock

Ask LitCharts AI: The answer to your questions

• English Literature
• Short Stories
• Literary Terms
• Web Stories

The Waste Land by T. S. Eliot | In-Depth Summary & Analysis

T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land” stands as a cornerstone of modernist poetry, captivating readers with its intricate imagery and profound themes. Published in 1922, this landmark work reflects the disillusionment and fragmentation of post-World War I society. In this article, we delve into the depths of “The Waste Land,” uncovering its layers of meaning and exploring its enduring relevance.

Table of Contents

Historical Context

To understand “The Waste Land,” one must first grasp the cultural and intellectual milieu of the early 20th century. The modernist movement, characterized by its rejection of traditional forms and conventions, was in full swing. Eliot’s poem emerged amidst a backdrop of social upheaval, technological advancements, and existential angst.

Overview of the Poem

Structure and form.

“The Waste Land” is divided into five sections, each with its own distinctive voice and style. Eliot employs a range of literary techniques, including free verse, rhyme, and allusion, to convey the fractured nature of modern experience. The poem’s non-linear narrative and kaleidoscopic imagery mirror the disorienting chaos of the modern world.

Themes and Motifs

At its core, “The Waste Land” grapples with themes of disillusionment, spiritual emptiness, and cultural decay. Through motifs such as drought, death, and fragmentation, Eliot paints a bleak portrait of a civilization in decline. Yet, amidst the desolation, glimmers of hope and redemption emerge, offering glimpses of renewal and transcendence.

Section-by-Section Summary

The burial of the dead.

The opening section sets the tone for the entire poem, juxtaposing scenes of life and death, fertility and barrenness. Drawing on various mythological and literary sources, Eliot depicts a world haunted by memories of the past and devoid of spiritual vitality.

A Game of Chess

In this section, Eliot explores themes of love, desire, and disillusionment through a series of fragmented vignettes. The interplay of voices and perspectives creates a sense of disconnection and alienation, echoing the breakdown of interpersonal relationships in the modern age.

The Fire Sermon

“The Fire Sermon” delves into the destructive forces of desire and consumption, drawing parallels between physical and spiritual decay. Eliot’s use of imagery, particularly references to fire and water, underscores the cyclical nature of existence and the inevitability of destruction.

Death by Water

This section evokes themes of purification and rebirth, exploring the transformative power of water as a symbol of regeneration. Through vivid imagery and lyrical language, Eliot charts a course from death to renewal, offering a glimmer of hope amidst the prevailing despair.

What the Thunder Said

The final section of the poem culminates in a vision of spiritual awakening and redemption. Drawing on various religious and mythological traditions, Eliot invokes the image of the Fisher King as a symbol of divine grace and healing. The poem ends with a sense of resolution and transcendence, suggesting the possibility of renewal amidst the wasteland of modern life.

Analysis of Key Themes

Fragmentation and disillusionment.

Throughout “The Waste Land,” Eliot explores the fragmented nature of modern experience, highlighting the disintegration of traditional values and beliefs. The poem’s disjointed structure and fragmented narrative mirror the fractured state of post-war society, where meaning and coherence seem elusive.

Cultural Decay and Loss of Identity

Eliot’s wasteland is a barren landscape devoid of spiritual and moral vitality, where civilization teeters on the brink of collapse. Through vivid imagery and allusion, he exposes the emptiness and futility of modern life, lamenting the loss of cultural heritage and collective identity.

Redemption and Spiritual Renewal

Despite its bleak portrayal of contemporary society, “The Waste Land” offers glimpses of redemption and transcendence. Through moments of epiphany and revelation, Eliot suggests that salvation is possible, albeit elusive. The poem’s final lines hint at the possibility of spiritual renewal, leaving the reader with a sense of hope amidst the desolation.

Symbolism and Imagery

Water serves as a central motif in “The Waste Land,” symbolizing both destruction and renewal. From the barren wasteland to the flowing river, water represents the cyclical nature of existence and the possibility of rebirth amidst decay.

Waste and Barrenness

The wasteland itself becomes a powerful symbol of cultural and spiritual decay, reflecting the desolation and disillusionment of post-war Europe. Through images of drought, death, and decay, Eliot evokes a sense of emptiness and futility, highlighting the barrenness of modern existence.

The Fisher King

Central to the poem’s symbolism is the figure of the Fisher King, a mythical ruler associated with fertility and regeneration. As a symbol of divine grace and healing, the Fisher King embodies the possibility of redemption amidst the wasteland of modernity.

Influences and References

“The Waste Land” is replete with allusions to literary, mythological, and philosophical sources. From Dante’s “Inferno” to the Upanishads, Eliot draws on a wide range of traditions to enrich his poem’s tapestry of meaning. By weaving together these diverse influences, he creates a multi-layered work that rewards careful scrutiny and interpretation.

READ MORE : 

• The Victorian Society Image In The Picture Of Dorian Gray
• Discuss the subtitle “The Modern Prometheus” in Frankenstein
• List of poets laureate of Britain | Names, Years, & Facts

Critical Reception and Legacy

Upon its publication, “The Waste Land” garnered both acclaim and controversy, provoking intense debate among critics and scholars. While some hailed it as a masterpiece of modernist literature, others condemned its obscurity and pessimism. Nevertheless, the poem’s enduring legacy is undeniable, shaping the course of 20th-century poetry and inspiring generations of writers to come.

In conclusion, “The Waste Land” stands as a testament to T.S. Eliot’s genius and vision. Through its intricate imagery, profound themes, and rich symbolism, the poem offers a haunting portrait of a world in crisis. Yet, amidst the desolation, there are moments of beauty and transcendence, reminding us of the enduring power of the human spirit to rise above adversity.

Is “The Waste Land” difficult to understand?

While “The Waste Land” is known for its complexity, careful reading and analysis can reveal its deeper meanings and themes.

What are some key literary influences on “The Waste Land”?

Eliot drew inspiration from a wide range of sources, including Dante’s “Inferno,” James Joyce’s “Ulysses,” and the works of French symbolist poets.

What role does mythology play in “The Waste Land”?

Mythological references abound in the poem, serving as a source of richness and depth in its imagery and symbolism.

How does “The Waste Land” reflect the cultural and intellectual climate of its time?

“The Waste Land” captures the disillusionment and fragmentation of post-World War I society, reflecting the anxieties and uncertainties of the modern age.

What is the significance of the poem’s title?

The title “The Waste Land” evokes themes of desolation and decay, reflecting the barrenness of the modern world depicted in the poem.

Related Posts

When was the golden notebook first published, the title of the first book in j.r.r. tolkien’s “the lord of the rings” series, who wrote “the chronicles of barsetshire” series.

• Advertisement
• Privacy & Policy
• Other Links

© 2023 Literopedia

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Remember Me

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?

Are you sure want to cancel subscription.

• Craft and Criticism
• Fiction and Poetry
• News and Culture
• Lit Hub Radio
• Reading Lists

• Literary Criticism
• Craft and Advice
• In Conversation
• On Translation
• Short Story
• From the Novel
• Bookstores and Libraries
• Film and TV
• Art and Photography
• Freeman’s
• The Virtual Book Channel
• Behind the Mic
• Beyond the Page
• The Cosmic Library
• The Critic and Her Publics
• Emergence Magazine
• Fiction/Non/Fiction
• First Draft: A Dialogue on Writing
• Future Fables
• The History of Literature
• I’m a Writer But
• Just the Right Book
• Lit Century
• The Literary Life with Mitchell Kaplan
• New Books Network
• Tor Presents: Voyage Into Genre
• Windham-Campbell Prizes Podcast
• Write-minded
• The Best of the Decade
• Best Reviewed Books
• BookMarks Daily Giveaway
• The Daily Thrill
• CrimeReads Daily Giveaway

The Most Important Poem of the 20th Century: On T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land” at 100

“the poem is such a key landmark that all modern poets know it, whether they swerve around it, crash into it, or attempt to assimilate it.”.

In honor of the 100th anniversary of the publication of “The Waste Land,” we invited four writers and academics—Beci Carver, Jahan Ramazani, Robert Crawford, and David Barnes—to discuss the importance, context, artistry, and legacy of the poem.

* Can you tell us a bit about your personal experience of reading the poem. How did you first encounter it, and what do you remember about that encounter?

Beci Carver : I had climbed through my college boyfriend’s open window and found Eliot on his shelf, where I knew he would be. I’d become used to staring at the book, alongside a gorgeous bright green copy of Nabokov’s Lolita , a thick white edition of Sartre’s Being and Nothingness , William Carlos Williams’s Selected Poems , and the complete Alexander Pope. My boyfriend was known at uni for his long silences and aloofness, and my way of reading him was to read his books.

He was away for the weekend at home when I discovered Eliot, and I remember being hooked by the first lines, as though they were addressed to me. The line: ‘(Come in under the shadow of this red rock)’, with its beckoning brackets, seemed even more intimate, ironically enough, since I was reading it in the hope of reaching someone doubly absent. (As I write this, Eliot is peering at me beadily from under the handle of his umbrella, on the cover of John Haffenden’s newest installment of his letters).

Jahan Ramazani : Like many adolescents, I saw myself in “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” when I first read it in high school—the paralyzing self-consciousness, the anxieties about sex and the social world. For an Iranian American kid growing up in the rural South, the poem’s divided self was strangely recognizable. In college, I read The Waste Land through the lens of Prufrockian angst: the fragmentation and disorder were surely symptomatic of the poet’s own fear, alienation, and paralyzing self-scrutiny, however much the poem seemed to universalize such feelings as a civilizational disorder. Because a straight line seemed to run from the despair and nihilism of The Waste Land to Eliot’s religious conversion, my preference then was for Wallace Stevens’s humanistic, late Romantic celebration of the imaginative power to shape and create our worlds.

Looking at the yellowing notes I took during college lectures in the late 1970s, I now realize that my preference for Stevens, shaped by a professor who studied with Harold Bloom and another who admired him, reflected a time when Stevens was ascendant in the American academy, while concerns about Eliot’s sexism, elitism, and anti-Semitism were on the rise. (Stevens’s problematic views on race mostly came into focus later.) Still, even in my teens, already a devotee of Cubism and a jazz deejay at a local radio station, I loved the multiple perspectives, riotous heterogeneity, and discordant energies of The Waste Land .

Robert Crawford: I bought The Complete Poems and Plays of T. S. Eliot in John Smith’s bookshop, St Vincent Street, Glasgow, in 1974 when I was fifteen. The poem that made most impression on me was ‘The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock’, but really all the poems made a huge impression: not because I understood them, but because of their distinctive soundscapes. In a funny way, I can barely remember not having read The Waste Land. Its jaggedness and incorporation of animal cries and nursery rhyme as well as what then seemed to me  incomprehensible stuff wowed me—and still does. It’s such a singular acoustic. My favourite passage is the part of section V that precedes the water-dripping song of the thrush. The way Eliot is able to bring to bear such a weight of meaning and emotion on those monosyllables ‘Drip drop drip drop drop drop drop’ (which I read aloud as ‘‘Drip    drop    drip    drop     drop    drop    drop   ’) and then snatch everything away again in the following line is just breathtaking.

David Barnes: I first read The Waste Land when I was seventeen, or possibly eighteen. It wasn’t on the school syllabus, but I remember being encouraged to read it by a sympathetic teacher. In part it was because I started to feel drawn towards different kinds of avant-garde writing (I was reading Beckett and Kafka and responded to the bleak and angsty landscapes of those writers).

It was also, I think, designed to help us have something interesting to say as we applied to university—admissions tutors would be impressed by it. Reading it was a strange experience: it simultaneously felt completely impenetrable and incredibly fresh and exciting. I didn’t understand a word of it. But that didn’t seem to matter—it didn’t feel difficult to read, as Eliot is sometimes assumed to be. The only thing I could compare it with was the electronic music and sample culture that I’d grown to love in the late 1990s. DJ Shadow’s album Endtroducing had come out a year or two before I read The Waste Land . This was an album that began with a snippet of a public information record distributed to schools by Chevron/Standard Oil before segueing into a hippyish 1970s monologue about the signs of the zodiac.

Throughout the album, different pieces of seemingly random dialogue were cut, chopped up, scratched and fed into the music, sometimes harmoniously, sometimes dissonantly. The Waste Land was like that. It didn’t matter what anything meant, but it sounded great, as if Eliot had shed his pinstriped waistcoat and taken to the turntables as DJ.

* How has The Waste Land shaped the world of literature and culture as we know it today?

Beci Carver : Rereading Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 a year ago I was struck by Eliot’s sudden appearance in a novel I’ve always assumed had nothing to do with him. Heller’s Colonel Cargill is composing a so-called ‘homiletic memorandum’ for the men in his regiment, and declares over the phone to the officer recording his words: “Any fool can make money these days and most of them do. But what about people with talent and brains? Name, for example, one poet who makes money.” The officer, without identifying himself, responds crisply: “T.S. Eliot,” and slams down the phone, leaving Cargill and his superior, General Peckem, to wonder what he means: “That’s all he said. Just ‘T. S. Eliot.’” A joke then unfolds about the obscurity of the name “T.S. Eliot” to the philistine soldiers, who suspect they are dealing with a ‘new code.’ But this joke wouldn’t work if it were not the case that, to readers of the novel in 1961, ‘Just T. S. Eliot’ was enough to suggest a poet who made money from his poems.

Not only that, the name “Eliot”—I would argue—is expected here to suggest the experience of hearing an unidentified, bodiless, mysterious, and staccato speaker utter a single phrase. Readers of Heller’s Catch-22 are expected to have read the drifting chorus of voices that The Waste Land is. I was reminded of a brilliant essay of 1987 by Hugh Kenner about the poem’s invocation of the telephonic human voice with no body. I wondered whether Kenner had been inspired by Heller to read Eliot as he did.

This set of discoveries persuaded me that Eliot was: 1, famous (or at least had been in 1961), 2: famous in his capacity as someone who could be a poet for a living, 3: capable of being recognised on the basis of a poetic effect he had trademarked. It’s hard to think of another poet about whom these claims could be made. But something else worth mentioning is that Catch-22 ’s consciousness of Eliot is subterranean to it, up until this point in the narrative, and comes to the surface only when a joke makes room for it. My feeling is that Eliot has become, by now, as W.H. Auden writes of Freud, “a whole climate of opinion.” William Empson once wrote that he felt he couldn’t disentangle his own thoughts from those of Eliot, as though he had been so deeply influenced by him as to lose sight of him.  

Jahan Ramazani : By the middle of the twentieth century, The Waste Land , as my coeditors and I say of Eliot’s work in our headnote in The Norton Anthology of Modern and Contemporary Poetry , “was translated into many languages, and for decades the latest verses in Arabic, Swahili, or Japanese were far more likely to sound like Eliot than like earlier poets in those languages or like other poet’s in English. Eliot’s eminence became a hazard to poets such as William Carlos Williams and Hart Crane, who felt that their fundamental aesthetic problem was not to write like him.” The essays in the book The International Reception of T. S. Eliot (2007) trace these influences in France, Germany, Romania, Israel, India, Italy, Spain, China, Japan, and elsewhere.

In the anglophone world, it’s fascinating to consider the impact of The Waste Land on poets with political and cultural views diametrically opposed to Eliot’s, many from diverse backgrounds. The poem’s afterlife demonstrates not just “the anxiety of influence,” in Harold Bloom’s phrase, but the irony of influence. The Jewish objectivist poet Louis Zukofsky’s “Poem Beginning The,” written in the 1920s, adapts Eliot’s techniques of extensive quotation, collage, fragmentation, difficulty, and self-referentiality, playfully incorporating Jewish folk song and translations from Yiddish poetry, alongside high-cultural references, while responding optimistically to the recent Russian revolution. Eliot and anti-Eliot at the same time!

Disseminated by the British Council during the Cold War, Eliot was formative for the two most influential African Caribbean poets writing in English, Kamau Brathwaite and Derek Walcott. Brathwaite, who championed African survivals once suppressed in the Caribbean, knew Eliot’s poem by heart, echoed it repeatedly, and credited the older poet’s example with helping him bring Caribbean speech rhythms into his own poetry.

That is, a revolutionary Black poet seized on tools in the work of an Anglo-Catholic white guy with royalist, racist, elitist views. Like Eliot’s Waste Land , Brathwaite’s poetry shifts abruptly in speaker and tone, incorporates jazz and other musical forms, fuses overlapping characters, bridges lyric despair and epic collectivity, and tries to recompose a usable inheritance out of the shards of the cultural past. Similarly, in one of the most powerful African American poems mourning the transatlantic slave trade, Robert Hayden borrows from The Waste Land : he, too, animates various voices, including those of slavers, and collages diverse forms, such as hymns, prayers, diaries, and legal depositions, to give expression to the horror, brutality, and enormity of the Middle Passage.

A poet who grew up in a Muslim household in Kashmir and wrote his dissertation on Eliot, Agha Shahid Ali also draws on the self-referentiality, juxtapositions, syncretism, and what he calls the “sense of loss and desolation” in The Waste Land , akin to the melancholy of Urdu poetry. A hyphenated Kashmiri-American poet, Ali had a profound sense of displacement that reminds us of Eliot’s multiple displacements.

Having once been, Eliot suggested, an American southerner living in the North and northerner living in the South, he “was never anything anywhere” and “therefore felt himself to be more a Frenchman than an American and more an Englishman than a Frenchman.” Poets have often drawn on Eliot’s example to give utterance to their fractured, displaced, transnational experience. Poetry is a particularly rich medium for recording such complexities.

I should also mention that the Eliot scholar Anthony Cuda is writing an exciting book about how Eliot shaped the work of poets such as Sylvia Plath, Randall Jarrell, Seamus Heaney, and Louise Glück.

Robert Crawford: Though I do understand why people often see—and hear—“The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” as inventing modern poetry in English, I think The Waste Land does so more comprehensively. It’s as if this poem can give anything—a cry, a list of place-names, a snatch of conversation, a Sanskrit word, a nursery rhyme, an echo—an almost infinite and carrying resonance that brings with it unforgettable intensity. Ezra Pound who, prior to editing The Waste Land,  had just been editing an English translation of an avant-garde collage-style French poem by Jean Cocteau, helped give the poem its intensity; but the words were Eliot’s.

As I’ve argued in Young Eliot , Pound’s editing was highly ethical in that he did not add or substitute words of his own; he just honed what Eliot had written. Eliot had learned from Pound’s bricolage style, but where Pound went on to go on and on and on, Eliot (with Pound’s editorial help) learned as a young poet just when to stop. That’s a great gift. So the poem exemplifies at once the way in which poetry can incorporate all kinds of diverse materials; yet it also constitutes a supreme example of poetic intensity. It’s quite a combination—and one from which innumerable poets (from Auden to Xu Zhimo and from MacDiarmid to Okigbo and beyond) have learned.

David Barnes : Basil Bunting famously compared Ezra Pound’s Cantos to the Alps: a poet ‘would have to go a long way around’ if they wanted to avoid them. I don’t know if The Waste Land is quite like that. Certainly, poetry was not the same after The Waste Land ; at the same time, it’s perhaps more difficult to trace the influence of the poem than it is with Pound’s experimentations. In some ways, it’s quite difficult to go forward after The Waste Land , as it’s a poem that seems to have said it all. I sometimes wonder if The Waste Land hasn’t had more of an influence on the modern novel.

Evelyn Waugh named A Handful of Dust (1934) after a line from the poem, of course; Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby (1925) contains a number of conscious echoes of The Waste Land in its descriptions of the New York cityscape. And in post-war writers, that influence continued: Sam Selvon’s novel of alienated Caribbean immigrants, The Lonely Londoners (1956) begins with a description of the foggy “unrealness” of the London scene.

Jeanette Winterson’s novels are steeped in quotations from Eliot. The Waste Land has seeped into culture as a moving set of referents to describe urban alienation, fracture, cultural collapse. It also has a striking ability, inherent in its form I suppose, to speak across cultures. Jahan mentioned the impact of the text on Caribbean poets like Walcott and Braithwaite; and although it’s a poem focused on London, the apex of political and economic power, its language and structure seem also to destabilise, decentre.

* What do contemporary writers—poets especially—owe to The Waste Land ? Do you think the landscape of writing today would be very different were it not for the poem?

Beci Carver : Without being able to prove it but knowing it to be true, I would say that the availability of The Waste Land as a model has made it possible for poets ever since 1922 to demand more of their readers than they would have dreamt of doing before. Eliot liked difficulty, and one of his gifts to other poets was to make difficulty feasible for them. I would go so far as to say that every fridge magnet poetry kit put to the service of mad compositions owes its humor to Eliot.

But there are unflattering stories that need to be told about Eliot’s influence too, especially in light of what we now know about his toxic prejudices. When quotes revealing the extent of Eliot’s anti-Semitism started to float from Robert Crawford’s biography to Twitter’s limelight, I opened WhatsApp to find a flood of angry eloquence from my Jewish ex-girlfriend, who couldn’t believe what she was reading. Haffenden in his introduction to the new volume of letters explains that Eliot’s anti-Semitism belongs to a larger theory of literary culture premised upon national insularity.

In other words it wasn’t so much that Eliot hated any particular ethnic or ethno-religious group but that his adoptive English nativism made him generally suspicious of newcomers. I find this argument at once plausible and deeply alarming, and as a long-term admirer of Eliot, I wish I could disprove it. In his capacity as an insular English nationalist, Eliot may, to a degree, be held responsible for embedding British imperialist values in the literary canon, and even for inventing the literary canon as a phenomenon. It is partly because we are still, a hundred years on, reading the books Eliot told us to read, that, as Jed Esty argues in his dazzling little polemic, The Future of Decline , we are going to have to rethink literary history from scratch.

But at the same time that we know Eliot to have espoused a conservative view of literary tradition, it can be hard to see The Waste Land as an especially conservative text. When Donald Davie in 1957 started to worry that English literature risked becoming “parochial” after the fall of the British Empire, the poet that came to mind for him as an English nativist was Robert Graves, who went out of his way to magpie Anglo-Saxon words. For Davie, Eliot’s multilingualism in The Waste Land meant that English was losing its privileged status as the language everyone spoke, and that, in order to be relevant, ambitious modern poetry needed to open its arms to the world.

Jahan Ramazani : The Forward Prize-winning poet Daljit Nagra told me he used to drive around London listening to Eliot on his car’s audio system. Growing up in a Punjabi household in London, he was astonished in school to see a white, canonical, “English” poet repeatedly using the Sanskrit word “ shantih ,” a word often on the lips of family members, including a Sikh grandfather who chanted it daily in meditation. For Nagra, as for some other poets with roots in non-Western parts of the world, Eliot’s use of Indian cultural materials seems an important opening to a more global poetics.

Drawing on Eliot’s example, Nagra delights in throwing Punjabi up against English diction, song lyrics against writerly texts, spirited vernacular up against high art. Eliot’s poem helped create a juxtapositional, cross-cultural set of structures that have been useful for postcolonial and BAME writers trying to mediate between different aspects of their own hybrid, in-between experience. Written during an earlier phase of globalization, the poem’s multilingual, globe-straddling example has been valuable for poets of an even more globalized twenty-first century.

I’ll comment on the poem’s relevance to contemporary poets writing about climate change in response to the final question.

Robert Crawford: The poem is such a key landmark that all modern poets know it, whether they swerve around it, crash into it, or attempt to assimilate it. It’s become as unignorable as Shakespeare. As someone who writes poetry as well as biography and criticism, I have “skin in the game,” and so there’s a danger that I skew things too much in my own interest, but let’s just say that a poem whose three-word title is “The Waste Land” is bound to resonate widely in an era which fears environmental degradation.

Again, a poem which engages so courageously and adventurously with fears of mental and emotional collapse and (however bleakly) with sex and longing is never likely to lose its relevance. I think Jahan’s recent lecture on “Burying the Dead: The Waste Land, Eco-Critique and World Elegy,” which I was lucky enough to hear in London at the International T. S. Eliot Summer School, and which, I gather, is available to read free in volume 4 of the T. S. Eliot Studies Annual, is the most brilliant recent piece of Eliot criticism . It shows strikingly just how relevant the poem is to a great range of contemporary poets.

David Barnes : I think it’s had a vast influence. It’s also, along with Joyce’s Ulysses , become one of the flagship texts of modernism, a kind of gateway into the avant-garde. There are lots of other long experimental poems that are interesting. I should mention Hope Mirrlees’s Paris , published three years before The Waste Land , and a similar kaleidoscope of voices and references. In terms of contemporary poets, I think a poem like Alice Oswald’s Dart (2002) probably couldn’t exist without The Waste Land . Dart , following a river as it flows through rural Devon, presents a very different kind of setting to The Waste Land . Yet those strange haunting voices across the river, ghosts, past echoes and repeating refrains feel very Eliotic to me.

* Eliot’s poem came out of a period of intense mental anguish; Eliot wrote the poem in recovery from severe stress and anxiety. How can you see that experience reflected in the poem?

Beci Carver : When I published my first piece on The Waste Land over a decade ago I was convinced it was about moving house in the throes of a property market crisis, and remember finding it desperately significant that the only furnished room in the text had a draught. A decade later, I argued in another piece that what Eliot was really worried about was the rise of finance capitalism; I decided that for all his cultural conservatism, he was a socialist in his economic thinking.

But then, this July at the Eliot International Summer School in London, Megan Quigley gave a brilliant paper on the burnt half of Eliot’s correspondence with his secret American lover Emily Hale and I began to see bits of love letters everywhere in the poem’s sighs and ellipses. The truth is that, like any full life, Eliot’s in the late 1910s and early 1920s was dense with a hundred sadnesses, and because of the poem’s rare ore-like ability to absorb everything around it, we will always keep finding more meaning in its words and silences.

Robert Crawford: Well, only part of the poem was written while in recovery. Much of it was written while Eliot was in the midst of stress and anxiety. In fact, a few of the earliest fragments (if we believe Valerie Eliot, as I’m inclined to do) may date from his time as a graduate student in America. So the poem accrues over a substantial number of years, and is spliced together. It’s as if Eliot has been saving up poems and bits of poems in a secret drawer, waiting for them to coalesce.

That’s the way quite a lot of poets operate, and it’s certainly the way Eliot worked throughout much of his writing life. With the release of the Hale letters, we can appreciate more fully the poem’s emotional roots and freight. We can realise how, amongst other things, The Waste Land is a love poem, but a poem of love gone terribly, hurtfully wrong. Eliot’s wish to sunder poetry from biography was a way of trying to protect himself even as he exposed his deepest emotions in complex and piercing verse. Something remarkable is the way he was able to articulate his sense of anguish while in the midst of situations that threatened to break him (and even did break him, in some ways).

Astonishingly, that ability is there in so much of his later work too—in “The Hollow Men” and “Ash-Wednesday,” for instance. And it may be exemplified by the way he is able to write the later Quartets while having to deal with the day-to-day threat of death as a result of saturation bombing. If he had seen much of St Louis destroyed by a cyclone when he was eight, and had imagined London falling around him in The Waste Land , then later in his life he would become the greatest poet of World War II while living through the London Blitz.

David Barnes : I’ve come to see the poem as more specific and less universal the more I’ve read it. I don’t mean that it doesn’t have a universal appeal – but I think that’s more to do with the way that the sounds and textures of the poem work, rather than any part of its content. Part of that is recognising the ways in which the poem comes out of a particular moment of stress and anxiety for Eliot, and the ways in which the psychological treatment he underwent with Roger Vittoz impacted the development of the poem.

At the same time, the poem comes out of a specific political context. Eliot was working with Lloyd’s Bank in London on the way that war debt should be distributed, and worrying about the political landscape of post-war Europe. If you read the drafts of the poem, you also note a disturbing antipathy to humanity, manifesting in a kind of disgust with the urban crowd. Words like ‘swarming’ and ‘crawling’ feature, and we know Eliot was interested in eugenicist ideas (overlapping with the anti-Semitism and misogyny that is now, rightly, a large part of the critical debate on Eliot).

* Individual lines from the poem—“April is the cruellest month,” “a handful of dust” etc.—are instantly memorable, and have become embedded in our collective cultural consciousness. Why is this, do you think?

Beci Carver : I wonder whether the memorability of that first line has something to do with the famous radio recording of Eliot reading The Waste Land in which “cruellest” absorbs all the quirks of his Anglicized American accent. But what seems most strange to me about these phrases and others we tend to remember is that they aren’t in themselves especially distinctive or beautiful—though there are plenty of distinctive and beautiful phrases in the poem we could have memorized instead. The other day I bumped into the phrase ‘handful of dust’ in Conrad and wondered why I’d never noticed it before. How is it that Eliot can make you remember phrases with no beauty in them, that aren’t even his?

I’m conscious that this isn’t to answer the question but to complicate it. One answer could be that the very non-distinctiveness of some of Eliot’s phrases opens them to outside projection, so that we can find whatever we want in them and believe they belong to almost anyone. Lots of The Waste Land is echoed from other places and we could say that the poem’s reliance on theft gives certain of its lines a quality of innate stollenness, as though they may never be owned. Years ago I wondered why the novel Evelyn Waugh wrote about his divorce from Evelyn Gardner was called A Handful of Dust , although there are no other obvious references to Eliot in the book—and nor is Waugh in any obvious way a modernist writer.

I eventually decided that Waugh must be quietly referring to the tiny son of Tony and Brenda Last whose handful of life is tragically lost at the beginning of the novel, and it struck me as a lovely paradox that, at the same time that that phrase is by its nature so open-ended, Waugh’s split-second elegy in the title lets it mean something particular and tender.

Jahan Ramazani : According to Eliot, “ all art emulates the condition of ritual. That is what it comes from and to that it must always return for nourishment.” Poetic forms are rooted in ritualistic repetitions and rhythms, although Eliot often fragments and suspends those patterns. He remarks that “the ghost of some simple metre should lurk behind the arras in even the ‘freest’ verse.”

In The Waste Land , pentameter, ballad meter, popular song, prayer, and other rhythmical forms often lurk. Eliot also interweaves rhyme and other sonic repetitions through his unrhymed verse. One of the reasons his lines and phrases are memorable is that they are nourished by the underlying ritualism—repetition, cadence, music—of literary and cultural traditions, even as he deforms and decontextualizes them, almost beyond recognition.

Robert Crawford: It’s his ear. He simply has such a precisely calibrated sense of the acoustics of language. And he has the intellectual capacity to articulate it too. His explanation (in his 1932-33 Harvard lectures) of how the “auditory imagination” works, fusing the most ancient with the contemporary, is one of the best explanations of how great poetry operates.

And not long before The Waste Land he writes that manifesto essay (really a book review) “The Metaphysical Poets.” That piece makes it clear that precisely what Samuel Johnson detested in Donne and Metaphysical poetry—that sense of “heretogeneous ideas… yoked by violence together”—is precisely what Eliot loves; and it’s what makes The Waste Land sing. It works at the level of image, phrase, verse paragraph, and emotion: “April” and “cruellest month” do not go together, so when they are yoked together by a certain intellectual, emotional, and verbal violence, we register the shock.

David Barnes: The Waste Land has a loose iambic metre, and its musicality is something that makes its phrases memorable. At the same time, it’s also the sense that the diverse voices that call out from the poem demand a particular kind of attention (Eliot’s original title was “He do the police in different voices”). It’s as if they were different characters grabbing us by the arm to talk to us: “I will show you fear in a handful of dust,” “What are you thinking?,” “Stetson!”

In this sense, The Waste Land unfolds, each new time we read it, a bit like a theatrical performance (the poem has various references to dramatic works). It has, without overstressing the point, a kind of multi-sensory quality. In the therapy Eliot underwent with Vittoz, he would have been asked to concentrate on particular words, or objects, and it feels that we as readers are also being asked to concentrate.

* There are lots of different and seemingly competing fragments in The Waste Land : high culture and literature, religion, ragtime jazz, gramophones, tinned food, garbage, music hall, a London pub. How do we begin to make sense of all of this?

Beci Carver : About a week ago, I heard Matthew Bevis give a talk on lyric poetry, all about how poems written in the drifting, song-like, intimate way The Waste Land is can suggest ‘the nascency of the actual.’ I think this phrase beautifully captures how events in poems can seem to come into existence as you’re reading, and I think what makes The Waste Land ’s mad mixture of everyday ephemera—jazz, tins, divans, etc.—so arresting is exactly this effect of watching each one come from nowhere, out of the blue.

Eliot likes lists I think because, at our end, reading them is a little like watching a magician pull a string of colored scarves from her sleeve: we never know what will come next. There’s a sentence in the poem I always have to read in three ways at once: “The river bears no empty bottles, sandwich papers, / Silk handkerchiefs, cardboard boxes, cigarette ends / Or other testimony of summer nights,” because the first time I read it I see the bottles etc, the second time I tell myself they aren’t there, and the third I have to juggle my knowledge that they aren’t there with the fact that I can still see them.

Eliot plays another trick with the “silk handkerchiefs”—i.e. condoms, since that’s what the phrase would have meant to his first readers. The word “silk” is an anomaly among the rubbish until we recognise the slang, so it loses the anomaly status that makes it stand out just before the whole list vanishes. The condoms disappear twice.

Jahan Ramazani : Isn’t that the modern urban world? Isn’t the poem the closest a poet could get a hundred years ago to the mad heterogeneity we now experience on the Internet? Yet many of Eliot’s anglophone contemporaries hadn’t yet opened their poetry to modernity’s strange collisions of high and low, beauty and ugliness, the foul debris of waste and the flowers of romantic longing. Drawing on French symbolist examples and his own experience, Eliot did. Eliot scholar Frances Dickey is writing a fascinating book about the sensory experiences of urban life, including the sounds, odors, and sights of St. Louis, as imprinted on Eliot and transmogrified in his poetry.

Eliot’s famous words about Stravinsky’s “Rite of Spring” also illuminate The Waste Land : both works seem “to transform the rhythm of the steppes into the scream of the motor horn, the rattle of machinery, the grind of wheels, the beating of iron and steel, the roar of the underground railway, and the other barbaric cries of modern life; and to transform these despairing noises into music.” That’s one of the qualities that makes his poetry feel strangely alive and vibrant today.

Robert Crawford: We make sense of it all by listening, and by realising how much the poem is stretching our hearing, our feeling, and our comprehension. Reading it is like having to cross a very busy major road. You need to be very alert to dodge the traffic; but there’s a certain pleasure in doing so, and becoming conscious of some of the manoeuvres involved. If people struggle with the poem, it’s often because they think it’s a sort of cerebral crossword, and that spending hours in a library will let them come up with the solution, The Answer.

Well, it is a poem of great intellectual ambition; but the best thing to do is to read it aloud, even struggling with the bits in unfamiliar tongues, and to trust your intuition. In my experience, most people intuit that there is deep, and deeply disturbed emotion in the poem—and it’s the emotion that moves the reader as much as (and, I suspect, more than) the intellectual reach.

I’m very lucky in being the first Eliot biographer to be able to have access to his huge and passionate correspondence with Emily Hale, the woman who (as far as Eliot’s poetry is concerned) was the love of his life. And I’m convinced that knowing more about his emotional life—which I’ve set out particularly in Eliot After The Waste Land— encourages us to trust our intuition that Eliot’s is a powerfully emotional poetry. The women in his life registered that, and knew there was a cost.

David Barnes : I’m still grappling with this question. Eliot was reading the extracts of Ulysses in The Little Review before he wrote The Waste Land , and there may have been a sense in which he was inspired by Joyce’s method, undercutting the usual distinctions between “high” and “low” culture, and putting everything in to his text. I say everything, and of course that’s not quite true of course; but both writers were engaged in trying to represent a wide cross-section of urban life.

Both writers use myth to cut a way through these landscapes—indeed Eliot said, in his essay on Ulysses , that myth presented a device for ordering “the vast panorama of futility and anarchy” of modern life. I think Eliot was striving for a method that could include all the things in life he noticed, which weren’t necessarily the usual subjects of poetry. On the other hand, it is a “ waste” land, after all, and it could be that Eliot is drawing on the idea of waste, bringing our attention to the things that are discarded by society. In that sense it is—or could be—a fairly conservative critique of contemporary culture as cheapened and disposable. And you can’t avoid the fact that the poem’s voice can at times feel condescending and snobbish, as in the passage about the typist and the “young man carbuncular.”

* The Waste Land emerged in a post-war context of economic uncertainty, conflict, political fragmentation. How does The Waste Land speak to our own uncertain age?

Beci Carver : In my view it would be a bad thing if we were to respond to the current welter of crises as Eliot did, turning ourselves into insular nationalists mourning the loss of a nebulous tradition. I probably differ from most of the members of this roundtable in spending a substantial portion of my time in the classroom with students for whom Eliot is still a novelty.

A couple of years ago, my colleagues and I decided to remove Conrad’s Heart of Darkness from our modernism module on the grounds that, in the lightning flash of a term-time week, we could not adequately contextualize its racism, and when I was a uni student in the 2000s our wonderful supervisor Santanu Das introduced us to The Waste Land alongside Anthony Julius’s T. S. Eliot, Anti-Semitism, and Literary Form . On a pedagogical level at least, I don’t think we can afford to present Eliot as someone who had appropriate answers to give to modernity’s problems.

But one good thing that The Waste Land may incentivize us to do in 2022 is to find a language perfectly suited to the present in which to describe the present’s concerns. There were plenty of poets in 1922 who continued to churn out the kinds of poems they had always written. But Eliot chose to speak to his moment. Better than that, he made words written thousands of years ago sound like coinages of his poem, so that reading The Waste Land now we hear its words as modern.

Jahan Ramazani: A poem that begins with a section titled “The Burial of the Dead,” The Waste Land speaks powerfully, I argue in a recent essay, to the planetary grief and apocalyptic dread that characterize our era of climate change. If we take seriously Eliot’s theory of literary change—that today’s literature is “altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past”— The Waste Land is effectively becoming a different poem in the time of the Great Acceleration.

Though sometimes read as mourning the war dead or Eliot’s father or his marriage or Western civilization, the poem increasingly seems like a lament for all the above and more—even the world itself. Newly resonant in our moment are the poem’s desertified, rocky landscape, its unburied corpses, its polluted air, its “dry sterile thunder without rain,” its rivers sunken or sweating oil and tar or strewn with garbage, its accusation of the culpable reader, its diffused sense of catastrophe on a global scale, and its refusal to pretend that the losses it mourns can be redeemed.

Contemporary poets responding to climate change often echo the language and forms of The Waste Land , a paradigmatic poem of world-encompassing, apocalyptic mourning. Jorie Graham repurposes Eliot’s repurposing of Shakespeare’s “sea change” for the more literal sea changes brought by melting ice caps. John Powell Ward recycles apocalyptic language from The Waste Land in his poem “Hurry Up Please, It’s Time,” enumerating individual efforts to stave off climate apocalypse and salvage humanity. Echoing Eliot’s list of fallen and doomed civilizations, Lavinia Greenlaw recites the names of cities at risk of being obliterated by sea level rise, “Calcutta, Tokyo, San Francisco, / Venice, Amsterdam, Baku, / Alexandria, Santo Domingo.”

Adapting strategies from The Waste Land to angrily grieve the effects of climate change, Peter Reading collages scientific report, journalism, the ubi sunt tradition, autobiography, and prophetic invective, while surveying the future of the planet. Simon Armitage transforms the biblical story of Noah’s ark into a warning about climate change, borrowing from The Waste Land the collapsing of boundaries between song and text, winter and spring, the Caimans and Antarctica. In one of a series of climate poems, Patience Agbabi redeploys the space-shifting freedom of Eliot’s poem, leaping back and forth between an air flight and the effects below of fossil-fuel emissions on the flood-ravaged Nepalese landscape.

In a brilliant unpublished poem, “The West Land,” Scottish poet and Eliot biographer Robert Crawford resituates The Waste Land in the scorched and burning landscape of a dystopian Australia. Because Eliot devises poetic equipment for traversing enormous distances in space and in time, The Waste Land provides contemporary poets with the means to grapple with and mourn the vast geophysical changes ravaging our planet.

Robert Crawford: Yes, I agree with Jahan. It’s the sense of a land laid waste that resonates with us now in a way that may be disconcertingly different to the impact that the poem had on readers in 1922. Also it’s the uncanny registering of acute mental and emotional distress. The Waste Land, first published in highbrow little magazines and (in book form) by avant-garde presses (in England by Leonard and Virginia Woolf’s Hogarth Press in 1923), was a very elite poem when it came out—a poem that an Oxford student toff would declaim through a megaphone as a way of showing off.

Yet over the decades its uncanny grip has been felt by more and more people across a range of cultures, classes, races, genders on every continent. Eliot may have been an intellectual elitist, a self-confessed snob, and at times a cutting and cruel man with antisemitic and racist streaks who could exploit women; but (as well as being, e.g., a brilliant publisher, critic, children’s writer, successful dramatist, public intellectual, and poet) he was also a human being who registered deep hurt, love, longing, and spiritual hunger.

In other words, like it or not, he was like most of us. What made him exceptional was the way he could so memorably articulate what are common human experiences, and give them a new, sharper figuration in words that go on ringing and are unlikely to fall silent. Particularly since the release of the Hale letters, we can understand him anew. And that process has a long way to run!

David Barnes: There is a sense of collapse or doom in The Waste Land— those “falling towers,” the feeling of ruin and fragmentation that pervades the poem. Eliot was animated both by his own personal stresses and anxieties, and by wider fears for society. Through his work at the bank he was getting an inside view of the political and economic turmoil of post-war Europe. He worried in particular that the war reparations imposed on Germany and Austria would lead to dangerous political implications.

He wrote to his mother that the “reorganisation” of nations that had been imposed by the Treaty of Versailles had been a “fiasco.” Again, this can manifest itself in a right-wing politics of fear—anxiety about the (revolutionary?) mass and the crowd. It’s always a challenge for a writer to address the anxieties of the age: climate change, environmental collapse, war, financial instability. Eliot’s poem is one model of how a poet might address collective fears, folding them into patterns of myth and history in a text that is simultaneously archaic and absolutely contemporary.

David Barnes lectures in English Literature at Trinity College, Oxford, and has held academic positions at a number of different universities. He teaches, writes and researches about literature, history and politics in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He is the author of The Venice Myth: Culture, Literature, Politics 1800 to the Present (2014). His work has appeared in the New European , Times Literary Supplement , The Guardian , and The Times . He has also written, produced or presented a number of programmes for BBC Radio, notably Escape of the Zebra (as writer/presenter: BBC Radio 3, 2019) and Regarding the Pain of Others  (as co-producer: BBC Radio 3/World Service, 2021).

Beci Carver is a lecturer at the University of Exeter and the author of Granular Modernism (2014). She has published extensively on modernist, modern and contemporary literature, and is currently finishing a book called Modernism’s Whims .

Robert Crawford is the author of Eliot After the Waste Land (Farrar, Straus and Giroux) and Young Eliot: From St. Louis to “The Waste Land.”  He is also the author of Scotland’s Books and the coeditor of The Penguin Book of Scottish Verse . A fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, of the British Academy, and of the Royal Society of Literature, he is an emeritus professor of modern Scottish literature at the University of St. Andrews. The Bard , his biography of Robert Burns, was named the Saltire Society Scottish Book of the Year in 2009. Crawford’s poetry collections include Testament and Full Volume , the latter of which was short-listed for the T. S. Eliot Prize. He lives in Scotland.

Jahan Ramazani is University Professor and Edgar F. Shannon Professor of English at the University of Virginia. He is the author of a number of books of criticism on poetry, including Poetry in a Global Age (2020); Poetry and Its Others: News, Prayer, Song, and the Dialogue of Genres (2014); A Transnational Poetics (2009), winner of the Harry Levin Prize for the best book in comparative literary history published in the years 2008 to 2010; The Hybrid Muse: Postcolonial Poetry in English (2001); Poetry of Mourning: The Modern Elegy from Hardy to Heaney (1994), a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award; and Yeats and the Poetry of Death: Elegy, Self-Elegy, and the Sublime (1990). He is editor of The Cambridge Companion to Postcolonial Poetry (2017); a coeditor of the most recent editions of The Norton Anthology of Modern and Contemporary Poetry (2003) and The Norton Anthology of English Literature (2006, 2012, 2018); and an associate editor of The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (2012). Elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Philosophical Society, he is a recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship, an NEH Fellowship, a Rhodes Scholarship, the William Riley Parker Prize of the MLA, and the Thomas Jefferson Award, the University of Virginia’s highest honor.

Literary Hub

Previous article, next article.

• RSS - Posts

Created by Grove Atlantic and Electric Literature

Sign Up For Our Newsletters

How to Pitch Lit Hub

Advertisers: Contact Us

Privacy Policy

Support Lit Hub - Become A Member

Become a Lit Hub Supporting Member : Because Books Matter

For the past decade, Literary Hub has brought you the best of the book world for free—no paywall. But our future relies on you. In return for a donation, you’ll get an ad-free reading experience , exclusive editors’ picks, book giveaways, and our coveted Joan Didion Lit Hub tote bag . Most importantly, you’ll keep independent book coverage alive and thriving on the internet.

Become a member for as low as $5/month

(92) 336 3216666

[email protected]

• The Waste Land

Background of the Poem

Historical background.

After the First World War, the people of Europe were left disturbed and disillusioned. The beliefs and values around which their societies were based lost their authenticity. The people of Europe questioned them and considered them to be the cause of the horrific war they had faced. They tried to leave behind their past and move on. They were on a quest to build a new world. In this way, their connection with their history was utterly lost. They rejected all their beliefs, which they had held in the past.

T.S. Eliot—the writer of this poem—had an immediate experience of these anarchic times. He saw the European societies crumble down in a matter of a few years. He knew that these changes would bring a huge effect on the continent.  

In the poem The Waste Land, the poet has given an outlet to his own mental condition and the condition of society. The physical deterioration of the society is depicted in this poem through the images of infertility and dryness. The disjointed social set-up of that time is depicted through the images of broken things in the poem. The poem describes the infertility of modern man and speaks of the benumbed condition of humanity .

Literary Background

The Waste Land is perhaps the most important highlight of Eliot’s poetic career. It was written in the year 1922. It was the time of Modernism. Modernism was a movement in which artists and writers tried to find novel methods of observation, new methods of getting knowledge, and leaving behind every established rule. In literature, it was characterized by fragmentation in narration and abandonment of an objective viewpoint. The literary works also concerned existential themes like the purposelessness of life and the quest for the meaning of life by individuals.

This poem is written in the full spirit of Modernism. The ideas of the poem are scattered around in the poem, and there is no coherence in the thought. There are a lot of allusions to other works of art. At the same time, the speaker of the poem does not remain the same throughout the poem. There are several speakers in almost every section of the poem.

Moreover, there are a lot of instances of existentialism in the poem. Many speakers of the poem are trapped in the anxiety and dread of being. They all try to give meaning to their lives in one way or the other.

The Waste Land Summary

A mythical character Sibyl of Cumae, appears in the epigraph of the poem. The speaker says that when a group of young boys visited the Sibyl and asked her what she wanted, she replied that she wanted death.

The rest of the poem is divided into five different sections which are as under:

The Burial of the Dead

At the start of this part, the speaker—an aristocratic lady—speaks of her happy past days. She recollects the memory of the beautiful days passed in Germany. She talks of her visit to her cousin and the fun activities they had. Intermingled with these pleasant recollections, there is a shadow of the infertility of modern times.

After this happy episode, a new speaker tells an unknown listener about showing him/her a novel thing. Then he starts talking about the inevitable death and the desiccation of humanity in modern times. He gives the image of love in modern times, which is fixed upon lust and physical needs only. It has no spirituality left in it.

The next shift in the scenes brings a card reader. She is named Madame Sosostris. She foreshadows that water will bring death and that the men should fear it. She also talks about how she is forced to carry out her business in secret.

The scene changes again, and the speaker describes the condition of ordinary men in modern times. He says that a lot of people are walking in the streets of London, but they have lost their vitality. They seem alive but are dead from the inside. The speaker, then, recollects a meeting with a soldier during a war. One soldier asks the other whether the corpse he buried in his garden has sprouted or not. Suddenly, the speaker turns his attention towards the readers and accuses them that they are not innocents. They have an equal share in the wrongs described in the poem.

A Game of Chess

This section opens with the description of a well-to-do lady and the room she is sitting in. The room is laden with a lot of beauty products and perfumes. She is sitting on a burnished chair waiting for someone. Scattered among the artificial objects of ornamentation, there are a few glimpses of the past time.

When the person whom she is waiting for arrives, they indulge in a meaningless dialogue. The person tells her that they are in “rats’ alley” and cannot do anything. They talk about how they are going to pass their time and wait for the knock on the door.

The next part of this section discusses a meeting of two underprivileged ladies sitting in a bar. They are talking about a woman named Lil. They say that her husband is returning after a long time serving in the army. They show their concerns about the appearance of Lil as she has not treated her teeth and has lost her charm. Therefore, they think that her husband will try to find recompense in other women.  One of the two ladies says that Lil blames the abortion pills she has used for her bad teeth. While these two women are talking, the keeper of the bar repeatedly tells them to hurry up because the time is over. Towards the end, the two women depart bidding good night several times.

Fire Sermon

This section opens with the description of a dirty place by a riverside. The river is filled with garbage, and rats are pushing themselves here and there. The speaker tries to catch fish in this river and thinks about his father and brother. He recalls how both of them died in the same manner.

With the shift in the setting, the speaker narrates as an event when he was invited to homosexuality. He says that a merchant called Eugenides gave him an offer to have dinner with him and then spend the weekend with him in a notorious hotel.

Then, a speaker named Tiresias starts narrating the proceedings of a hectic day of a female typist. She is a young lady and works till late. She comes home after work, and the dirty dishes from breakfast wait for her in her room. She cleans the mess and waits for her lover. The lover, who is a dull young guy, comes, and they indulge in sexual activities. However, their actions have no warmth. The typist shows no emotions when the deed is being done. She even expresses her happiness when this activity ends.   

At the end of this section, there are happier images of a church, a bar, and the river Thames. The speaker recalls the love affair of Earl of Leicester and Queen Elizabeth. The speaker says that Queen Elizabeth only thought about her people and sacrificed her personal likings for the interest of the people.  Then, there is a confession of a lady of modern times who talks about her affairs with many men. She says that she was promised a new start, but she said nothing.

The last few lines of the section include a prayer to Lord where the speaker asks for salvation and mercy as he is burning in fire.

Death by Water

This section concerns the drowning of Phlebas. The speaker says that Phelabas has died by drowning in water and that his body has lost connection with the outside world. In the same manner, the speaker warns, the readers’ bodies will lose connection with the world, and they will die. Therefore, they should remember their own deaths.

What the Thunder Said

At the start of this section, the speaker talks about the condition of the modern man. He says that modern men move around in the cities, but they have lost their human vitality. They are unreal human beings. They might walk and work like living humans but are dead from the inside. Therefore, cities like London, Vienna, Athens, Jerusalem, and Alexandria, where these unreal humans live, have also become unreal. The speaker describes the condition of a chapel and says that it is empty. There is no one inside it but wind.

Suddenly, there is a shift in the setting, and the speaker describes the conditions of the east. He says that it is going to rain near the Ganges. Here the three aspects of thunder, according to Hindu mythology, are introduced. The first aspect of thunder is “Datta,” which means “give.” The second aspect of thunder is “Dayadhvam,” which means “sympathize.” The third aspect of thunder is “Damyata,” which means “control.” The poem ends with the repetition of the word “Shantih.”

Themes in The Waste Land by T. S. Eliot

Death soars over the poem. The reader is led towards death in almost every paragraph of the poem. Death is not only physical death but is also spiritual and moral. The people of the modern world are breathing but are dead in this life of theirs. They have lost the essence of life. The Sibyl of Cumae appears at the start of the poem. She has been granted eternal life. However, she is fed up with this life and wants to die. Her life is full of miseries and has no joy to offer. The same is the case with the rest of the characters in the poem. 

The typist engages in sexual intercourse but has no emotional attachment with the person. Similarly, the wealthy woman at the start of the second section shows no signs of feelings towards her lover. In this way, the different shapes of death stay the dominant theme throughout the whole poem.   

Loss of High Culture

Modern man does not have faith in the culture and traditions of his past. He does not want to revisit the past values, which resulted in a horrific war. The centers around which the society stood are no more acceptable to him. This theme recurs many times in the poem. There are many allusions to the works of the glorious past age, which contrast the gloom of the present against the joy of the past.

The speaker laments how the high standards of European culture are lost, and the modern man has died spiritually. Artificiality and materialism have taken the place of the originality of the high culture of the past.

Throughout the poem, there are instances of resurrection and rebirth. The modern man has died a spiritual death. However, the speaker has hope that resurrection is coming close. Soon the lost generation will retain their lost values and attain normality. The image of Christ is strewn throughout the poem, which symbolizes resurrection and rebirth.

The land described in the poem is barren and dry. There is no water to give birth to new life. Furthermore, Fisher King fishes desperately to regain his potency. These images bring hopelessness to the poem but are countered by the hopeful images of rebirth.

Physical Love

There are a lot of love relations in the poem. The allusion to the story of Philomel sets the tone for this theme. The aristocratic lady at the start of the second section waits for her lover. Similarly, the young typist girl waits for her dull lover in her room. Furthermore, there is a narration of a love affair involving the hyacinth girl. However, the common element between all these love relations is that they are devoid of any spirituality. Their love is only limited to physical needs and lust. They do not enjoy the communion of souls. Rather, it is just that their bodies meet and depart straight away. Everything about their love is mechanical and artificial. In this manner, the speaker reflects on the natural love in modern time.

Infertility

The title of the poem suggests that it is about a waste of land which is barren and dry. The same motif reoccurs in many instances in the poem. In the second line of the first section of the poem, the speaker refers to the land as dead. The water of Thames is also described as filthy. There are rats coming out of it. Similarly, there are other instances which stress the infertility of the modern man.

Spiritual Dryness

The modern man is breathing and walking but does not have the spiritual element intact. He is spiritually dry.  He cannot interact with other humans in the old manner. His motives in modern times are greed and lust. The materialistic approach of modern times has left him hollow from the inside. His love has also become limited to physical desires only. This idea of spiritual dryness is manifested in many parts of the poem. The speaker speaks of the barren land and how the modern man cannot appreciate something as beautiful as the song of a nightingale. He cannot feel anything the way people did in the past.

The Waste Land Literary Analysis

The poem The Waste Land mourns the infertility of the modern world. It makes the modern man see what sort of damage he has done to the world. In the poem, there are bits and pieces of the beauties of the past, which are juxtaposed with the fragmented social structure of modern times. This way, it highlights the darkness of the modern world against the light of the past times.

The poem The Waste Land is replete with allusions to other works of literature and mythology. Following are the major allusions found in this poem:

Unreal City

This is an allusion to a poem of Baudelaire, where this phrase refers to the city of Paris.

Madame Sosostris

This character is borrowed from Crome Yellow, a novel written by Aldous Huxley.

Crowd Flowed over London Bridge

This is an allusion to the famous work of Dante Inferno.

Those are Pearls that were his Eyes

This line is taken from one of the most famous plays of Shakespeare.

Belladonna is a famous painting of the Virgin Mary made by Leonardo De Vinci.

This is the name of the second section of the poem. It is borrowed from a play Women Beware Women. This play is written by Middleton.

The episode in the poem, which involves the character Philomel is an allusion to Ovid’s Metamorphosis.

Water of Leman

It is an allusion to Lake Leman. Bonnivard was imprisoned near this lake.

The character of Tiresias is borrowed from a Greek tragedy Oedipus Rex.  

Datta, Dayadhvam, and Damyata

These words are taken from Hindu mythology.

Following are the major symbols which appear in this poem:

The image of Christ can be seen in many instances in the poem. It functions as a symbol of rebirth. The modern man is shown to have died a spiritual death in the poem. However, there is still hope that he will regain what he has lost. This hope is symbolized through the recurrent image of Christ. This image promises rebirth after death.

Water appears as a symbol of life and death many times in the poem. The lack of water shows the lack of spirituality in many instances in the poem. Water is used as a symbol of spirituality and vitality. At the same time, water symbolizes an impending death. One of the five sections of the poem is the name “Death by Water.” The tarot reader Madame Sosostris also warns about death by water. In this manner, water symbolizes death and life at different points in the poem.

Fire occurs as the symbol of purgation in the poem. The modern man has committed many sins. In order to purge himself, he should go through fire to cleanse himself. At one instance, the symbol of fire also signifies the lust of modern man.

The tone of the poem is mournful, nostalgic, and hopeful. The poem sounds mournful for the loss of spirituality and high culture in modern times. It mourns the materialistic tendencies of men towards life and other human beings. At the same time, it remembers the glorious past days with a feeling of nostalgia. It reflects on the difference between the organic society of the past and the fragmented society of the present. However, the poem is not completely pessimistic. It has the elements of hope connected with the idea of rebirth and resurrection.

T. S. Eliot has employed a fragmented form for this poem to parallel the theme of fragmentation and disjointedness. The poem is divided into five sections, and each section stands for one of the five basic elements. These stanzas are again divided into stanzas spoken by different speakers. There is also no coherence in the content of the poem, and many different events and ideas are intermixed together. This type of form reaffirms the theme of chaotic and disjointed society in modern times.

Rhyme Scheme

There is no rhyming scheme followed in this poem. It was one of the significant characteristics of modern writing, where the writers followed no rules.

More From T. S. Eliot

• The Waste Land

by T.S. Eliot

The waste land essay questions.

Choose a single stanza of "The Waste Land" and analyze it. Consider meter, rhyme, ellipsis, imagery, allusion, and other poetic tropes.

Why is April "the cruellest month"?

Some critics have interpreted "The Waste Land" as a treatise on modern civilization, while others have argued that it is far more personal - an attempt on Eliot's part to grapple with his failing marriage. Trace the relationship between the personal and the universal in the poem, particularly in the opening section.

The narrator is constantly in flux in "The Waste Land." Outline the various roles and personas the narrator assumes, and consider the significance of each.

Why does Eliot refer to "Mylae" on line 70, instead of World War I? What does the substitution of an ancient war for a modern one mean? Consider the role of history in "The Waste Land," and Eliot's fluid conception of time.

Analyze the water imagery of "The Waste Land," from the summer rain in the beginning to the potentially redemptive shower at the end.

In "The Waste Land," death and life are the same. Discuss.

Is "The Fire Sermon" really a sermon? If so, what is Eliot preaching? If not, why is it called one?

"The Waste Land" is full of sounds, onomotopoiea: from "jug jug jug" to "drip drop" to "twit twit" to "co co rico." What is the significance of this technique for the poem as a whole? Analyze each of the moments in which such language appears.

Is "The Waste Land" hopeful or pessimistic?

The Waste Land Questions and Answers

The Question and Answer section for The Waste Land is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.

The Burial of the Dead

The title, The Burial of the Dead, speaks to the theme of death and loss and the continuity of suffering and spiritual decay.

What is the actual setting of the wasteland Eliot describes?

The Waste Land is set in a post war wastelend... a place destroyed by a massive war. The poem was written post WWI.

What does the thunder say? Why does Eliot suggest bringing order to self in a disordered world?

The poem closes with the repetition of the three words the thunder said: "Give, show compassion, and control yourself." This is what will help a disordered world.

Study Guide for The Waste Land

The Waste Land study guide contains a biography of T.S. Eliot, literature essays, a complete e-text, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

• About The Waste Land
• The Waste Land Summary
• Character List

Essays for The Waste Land

The Waste Land literature essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of The Waste Land.

• "A Room of One's Own", "Wasteland" and "J. Alfred Prufrock": The Affairs of Society
• Dry, Allusive, and Ambiguous: A Close Reading of "The Wasteland"
• Modernist Experimentation in The Waste Land
• T.S. Eliot's "The Wasteland": Portrait of a Desolate World
• Asceticism and Desire in The Wasteland

Lesson Plan for The Waste Land

• About the Author
• Study Objectives
• Common Core Standards
• Introduction to The Waste Land
• Relationship to Other Books
• Bringing in Technology
• Notes to the Teacher
• Related Links
• The Waste Land Bibliography

E-Text of The Waste Land

The Waste Land e-text contains the full text of The Waste Land.

• Notes on "The Waste Land"

Wikipedia Entries for The Waste Land

• Introduction
• Sources and influences
• Themes and interpretations

What Rereading a Book Can Reveal

Culture and entertainment musts from Rose Horowitch

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.

Welcome back to The Daily’s Sunday culture edition, in which one Atlantic writer or editor reveals what’s keeping them entertained. Today’s special guest is Rose Horowitch, an assistant editor who has written about the enrollment nightmare colleges are facing , the myth of the Gen Z gender divide , and why too many people own dogs .

Rose recently reread Anna Karenina and had “more of the intended takeaway” than she did the first time. She loves winding down with a good animal-rescue video, and she still can’t quite believe she got to see Bruce Springsteen in New Jersey.

First, here are three Sunday reads from The Atlantic :

• Our May cover story: “This will finish us.”
• Matt Gaetz is winning.
• Clash of the patriarchs

The Culture Survey: Rose Horowitch

The upcoming event I’m most looking forward to: The Morgan Library’s exhibit of Beatrix Potter’s drawings and letters. I’ve complained to friends about feeling disconnected from nature since moving to New York, and I hope that early drafts of The Tale of Peter Rabbit will cure me. (I’d also take any opportunity to visit the Morgan Library and marvel at the rows of well-worn books and the majesty of the ceilings.)

The television show I’m most enjoying right now: Does anyone else watch cooking shows for pure entertainment? I usually get bored before I can finish a TV show in full (Gen Z attention spans and all that), so I like to throw something on that I don’t need to watch consecutively. Julia & Jacques Cooking at Home , with Julia Child and Jacques Pépin, is my favorite of the genre. It’s a cooking show, yes, but it’s so much more. It was filmed near the end of Child’s life, and Pépin somehow managed to always lift the heavy copper pots yet let Julia take the lead with recipes. Their friendship is endlessly comforting.

Best novel I’ve recently read, and the best work of nonfiction: I’m midway through The Heaven & Earth Grocery Store , by James McBride. I highly recommend it based on what I’ve read so far. For best nonfiction, I’m going to choose two, but I promise they’re connected: The Year of Magical Thinking and Blue Nights , two of Joan Didion’s later books. At age 23, I’ve never been married and never had a child, let alone lost one. But these books articulate a kind of disorientation that I don’t know how to put into words—one that I’m convinced every human being experiences. [ Related: Lost histories of coexistence ]

A quiet song that I love, and a loud song that I love: Quiet: “Hunter,” by Jess Williamson. I learned about this song from a Jack Antonoff interview. I blindly trust his taste in music, and I’m glad I do. Medium-quiet: “Instant Crush,” by Daft Punk. You have to listen to this song nine times in a row to love it, but afterward, it will be firmly installed among your favorites. Loud- ish : “Ship of Fools,” by World Party. A great song to have in your headphones as you walk outside. I challenge anyone to not scream-sing the chorus.

A musical artist who means a lot to me: Bruce Springsteen. My mom is an avid Springsteen fan, so this pick is partly about his musical prowess, partly about my own nostalgia. “Waitin’ on a Sunny Day” seemed to always be humming in our car stereo when I was growing up. This past summer, I saw him in concert. I mostly remember my sister’s frenzied dancing and the oppressive heat in the nosebleed seats of MetLife Stadium. But I saw Bruce Springsteen! In New Jersey!

A piece of visual art that I cherish: Gustav Klimt’s Forester’s House in Weissenbach II (Garden) (though what a clunky title). Greenery crawls up the side of the small house, and the open windows reveal colorful bouquets. One of the great joys of living in New York City is how its museums transport you to another place and time. The Klimt exhibition at the Neue Galerie New York brought me to the Austrian countryside (did I mention I miss nature?). It’s best paired with a slice of cake from the café downstairs.

A cultural product I loved as a teenager and still love: I had a borderline obsession with the Strokes. I listened to all of their albums, then their unreleased songs. Then I watched their performances on late-night shows and on grainy film from small sets in New York, and then I watched their concert documentary (which I could find only on YouTube). We’ve all aged some since then, but they’re still releasing albums, and I’m still listening.

Something I recently revisited: A former teacher once told me that we reread books not to uncover something new in them but to see how we’ve changed. I recently reread Anna Karenina , firmly my favorite book. The first time I read it, I idolized Anna (embarrassing confession: I dressed like her at my high-school prom). The second time, I think I had more of the intended takeaway. [ Related: When people—and characters—surprise you ]

A piece of journalism that recently changed my perspective on a topic: Earlier this year, I picked up Strangers to Ourselves , the journalist Rachel Aviv’s book. It’s about mental illness, but it’s more about the stories we tell ourselves and how they exert control over our psyche. She focuses each chapter on an individual, and bookends the work with her own story and that of a young woman she met in treatment. Aviv is a marvel of a writer, and her careful focus on people reveals more than an abstract, analytical story ever could. [ Related: The diagnosis trap ]

My favorite way of wasting time on my phone: This will surprise no one who knows me, but I spend much of my time watching animal-rescue videos. It’s a varied genre, one that includes efforts to hoist elephants out of mud piles and unsnare sea turtles from fishing nets. I particularly enjoy watching dogs recover from illness and find a forever home. My favorite rescuer personality is Niall Harbison, who helps sick and injured strays in Thailand. His videos are the greatest thing X’s “For You” tab has ever shown me.

Something delightful introduced to me by a kid in my life: Rabbit Hill , a novel by Robert Lawson, has the Pixar quirk of being marketed toward children but clearly meant for adults. It’s about woodland creatures but also about family and generosity—an irresistible combination.

A good recommendation I recently received: My boyfriend put me onto Your Queen Is a Reptile , an experimental jazz album by Sons of Kemet. It’s so different from what I usually listen to; it’s frenetic, and each note is unexpected. It’s wholly mesmerizing.

The last museum or gallery show that I loved: Last year, I went to the Refik Anadol exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art. I’m not usually a big fan of modern art (this probably says more about me than about modern art), but Anadol’s work was beautiful and overwhelming. He trained a machine-learning model on the museum’s digitized collection and then displayed the result on a wall of LEDs. The machine generated crests of color that I can best describe as some undulating fourth state of matter.

A poem, or line of poetry, that I return to: “ Spring and Fall ,” by Gerard Manley Hopkins, will never fail to make me cry. The Goldengrove description. The meditation on aging. The last two lines! This poem entered my life just as I needed it. I like to think it ushered me into adulthood, and I keep it open in a tab on my computer for emergency reads.

The Week Ahead

• The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare , an action film directed by Guy Ritchie about a team of highly skilled World War II soldiers who use unconventional methods to fight the Nazis (in theaters Friday)
• The Sympathizer , a thrilling and satirical miniseries about a double agent for the Viet Cong who flees to the United States and moves into a refugee community (premieres today on Max)
• New Cold Wars , a book written by David E. Sanger with Mary K. Brooks, about America’s unstable modern-day rivalry with China and Russia (out Tuesday)

The 67-Hour Rule

By Derek Thompson

One of the hard-and-fast laws of economics is that people in rich countries work less than their peers in poorer countries. The rule holds across nations … But something strange happens when we shift our attention from individual workers to households. In the 1880s, when men worked long days and women were mostly cut off from the workforce, the typical American married couple averaged just over 68 hours of weekly paid labor. In 1965, as men’s workdays contracted and women poured into the workforce, the typical American married couple averaged 67 hours of weekly paid labor—just one hour less. In the early 2000s, the typical American married couple averaged, you guessed it, almost exactly 67 hours of weekly paid labor. In 2020? Still 67 hours.

Read the full article.

More in Culture

• Tupperware is in trouble.
• Civil War was made in anger.
• The alluring mystique of Candy Darling
• The wasteland is waiting for you.
• America is sick of swiping.
• Are pitchers pitching too hard?
• A rom-com you might have written
• Welcome to kidulthood.

Catch Up on The Atlantic

• Maine is a warning for America’s PFAS future.
• Trump has transformed the GOP all the way down.
• The RFK-curious women of Bucks County

Photo Album

Check out the winning photos from this year’s World Nature Photography Awards, including images of gorilla kinship, the cloud cover above a volcano, and more.

Stephanie Bai contributed to this newsletter.

Explore all of our newsletters.

When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic .

Advertisement

Supported by

‘Fallout’ Finds the Fun in an Apocalyptic Hellscape

TV’s latest big-ticket video game adaptation, from the creators of “Westworld,” takes a satirical, self-aware approach to the End Times.

• Share full article

By Austin Considine

The scream was just right — bloodcurdling, if also very funny — and the practical effects crew had finally found the proper volume and trajectory of the water cannon. The idea was to film what might happen if you ripped a man from the throat of a mutant salamander, exploding its guts like a giant water balloon.

All that remained was to decide what color of bile to slather on the actor (Johnny Pemberton) and on the salamander’s many teeth, which nuclear radiation had transformed into rows of humanlike fingers.

Based on observations made during a visit to the Brooklyn set of “Fallout” in early 2023, Amazon had spared no expense to make the show, the latest genre-bending series from Jonathan Nolan and Lisa Joy, the creators of “Westworld.” So it was no surprise when Nolan, on set to direct that chilly afternoon, was presented with not one but some half-dozen buckets of bile to choose from, in a variety of revolting hues. He settled on a pukey pinkish yellow.

“This is the closest thing to comedy that I’ve worked on,” he said later by phone. With writing credits on films like “Memento,” “The Dark Knight” and “The Prestige,” Nolan has tended to skew dark. Comically exploding monster guts — this was new territory.

“It’s a lot of fun,” he said.

A fun apocalypse? Amid all the doom and gloom of most sci-fi spectacles and social media feeds? Yes, please.

“Fallout” premieres Wednesday on Prime Video, and at first it may sound familiar to viewers of a certain postapocalyptic HBO hit from last year, “The Last of Us.” Imagine: a sprawling, expensive adaptation of a beloved videogame franchise that features an unlikely duo — a nihilistic old gunslinger with a tortured past and a tough young woman whose mission overlaps with his. Together, they travel a lawless America plagued by criminals, fanatics, killer mutants and trigger-happy survivors.

But where “The Last of Us” had a decidedly serious and heartfelt tone, “Fallout,” in keeping with its source material, is satirical and self-aware, rich with ironic detail. Sets and costumes lovingly blend B-movie conventions from multiple genres, including westerns, horror and Atomic Age sci-fi. The violence is comically over-the-top.

That unlikely duo? The man (Walton Goggins) is a disfigured former western star who, among other things, puts the woman (Ella Purnell) on a leash and tries to hawk her organs. Their overlapping mission? To find a severed head.

“I am still wrapping my head around it to be quite honest with you,” Goggins said during a brief production break on set. He was dressed in the kind of immaculate Hollywood cowboy duds — think golden fringe and a tidy matching neckerchief — that a real cowboy might spit a beer on.

“It’s ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’ meets. …” He paused, searched for the perfect comparison. “It’s ‘Strangelove’ meets the ‘Star Wars’ bar.”

Until recently, live-action video game adaptations were mostly a losing proposition for television. “The Last of Us” by most accounts broke the streak . A commercial and critical darling, it earned eight Primetime Emmys in January, and its 24 total nominations included one for best drama.

Such success seemed remote five years ago, when Nolan had his first conversations with Bethesda Game Studios, the company that owns the Fallout franchise. An avid gamer, Nolan had long been a fan. The original game, which debuted in 1997, established the premise: In an alternative America, the postwar optimism and kitschy aesthetics of the Eisenhower Era never ended, only evolved. There was no Vietnam, no Watergate, no Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. Then in 2077, a nuclear war between the United States and China wiped out modern civilization worldwide.

Those who could afford it retreated into vast underground networks of shelters, known as vaults, until it was safe to come out. The game begins in 2161 when a “vault-dweller,” who has never known anything but the Beaver Cleaver-ish culture preserved underground, ventures into the irradiated wastelands around Los Angeles on a vital mission. (Later games travel to other cities and times.)

Several Fallout adaptations had been aborted or turned down over the years, said Todd Howard, Bethesda’s executive producer, who is also an executive producer of the show. After seeing and loving “Westworld,” however, Howard approached Nolan and Joy. He had heard Nolan was a gamer.

“He had clearly played a lot,” Howard said — Fallout 3 especially. “He could speak to it with authenticity and had a view of what made it tick.” (“Fallout 3 was a game that you could play comfortably for 50 to 100 hours,” Nolan said.)

Bethesda’s priorities were twofold: A TV series had to stay true to the lore of the games but also be written like a whole new chapter, same as any game sequel.

“It was very important to us not to have a show that translated one particular game story but that told something original,” Howard said. “The main character in the Fallout series is the world of Fallout.”

Amazon signed on to produce in 2020, part of an overall deal with Nolan and Joy’s production company, Kilter Films. To begin building the Fallout world, Kilter brought in two creator-showrunners: One, Geneva Robertson-Dworet, had written scripts for big adaptations before, including “Tomb Raider” (2018) and “Captain Marvel” (2019); the other, Graham Wagner, was a TV comedy writer, with credits on “Baskets,” “Silicon Valley” and 50 episodes of “Portlandia.”

For them it was a “best of both worlds” situation. They had been given a trove of intellectual property to start with, already popular among millions. But they also had freedom to simply craft a good story without worrying so much about satisfying gamer fan police.

“The fans of the games want to hear us say that we take the I.P. seriously,” Wagner said in a joint interview with Robertson-Dworet. “Of course we do, because we like it. But you don’t want to let that burden make it feel like a job. Because then everyone’s watching you do a job, and then it just feels like work.”

Robertson-Dworet later added, laughing: “We talk a lot about the [expletive] we’re going to eat for the show. It’s going to be either too woke, too fascist, not fascist enough. … ” She trailed off. The possibilities were endless.

In a separate video call, Kyle MacLachlan, who plays a guest role in the show, didn’t seem worried. And he knows something about protective fan bases. (See: David Lynch’s “Dune.” Or David Lynch’s “Twin Peaks: The Return.”)

“I think it’s evident, when you look at the sets and the production value and the tone of the show, that they’re making a big effort to try to incorporate the reality of that world,” he said. “It’s a perfect place to put a story.”

For all the new material, fans of the game will find plenty that is familiar about the story. The show’s other male lead, Aaron Moten, plays an initiate of the Brotherhood of Steel, a fanatical warrior faction found in all of the games. (They suit up in Iron Man-like robotic armor that, 219 years after the end of modern civilization, is prone to breaking down.) Though Purnell’s character arrives over 130 years after the events of the first game, she draws heavily from it.

“She goes up to the wasteland, and she finds out that everything she ever believed is a lie,” Purnell said on a video call with Moten. “It makes her start to question everything,” she added. “And she has to make that choice, right? Adapt or die. Who’s she going to be?”

However fans respond to “Fallout,” no one can doubt the creators’ commitment. Back in Brooklyn in early 2023, a set tour with the show’s production designer, Howard Cummings, offered a glimpse of the massive scope. Indoors, a mazelike series of corridors and chambers amounted to a multilevel reproduction of the vaults. Outdoors, a ramshackle junk city included whole buses and the front end of a 747 jet, trucked in from California. The New York production alone had 35 welders working at once, Cummings said.

This was to say nothing of the location shoots in the Utah desert, or on the Skeleton Coast in Namibia , a stand-in for a postapocalyptic Pacific Palisades, all shot on widescreen film instead of digital. (“The power of dragging yourself to a beautiful and remote place to capture that beauty on film, it still works,” Nolan said. “It always works.”) Or of the 360-degree virtual soundstage, made up of thousands of LED tiles — for when you need the location to come to you.

“New York didn’t have one,” Cummings said. “But it does now!”

Unsurprisingly, “Fallout” looks great. Still, all the money in Amazon’s coffers can’t make a show good, and the streamer, which declined to share budget numbers, has reportedly spent hundreds of millions of dollars on large-scale series, like “Citadel” and “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power,” that have yet to make much of an impact with viewers or critics. Amid the glut of heavier end-times material out there, it seemed like a refreshing start, at least, that the “Fallout” creators’ goal was to entertain viewers, not pile onto them.

Nolan called making it an “expiating” experience: Coming out of a pandemic, amid global instability and a deterioration of political discourse, you had to laugh sometimes, he said.

“It’s the only way to make it through.”

Because of a surprise programming change by Amazon the night before publication, an earlier version of this article misstated the premiere date of “Fallout.” It is Wednesday, April 10, not Thursday.

How we handle corrections

Austin Considine is The Times's assistant TV editor. More about Austin Considine

Explore More in TV and Movies

Not sure what to watch next we can help..

Even before his new film “Civil War” was released, the writer-director Alex Garland faced controversy over his vision of a divided America  with Texas and California as allies.

Theda Hammel’s directorial debut, “Stress Positions,” a comedy about millennials weathering the early days of the pandemic , will ask audiences to return to a time that many people would rather forget.

“Fallout,” TV’s latest big-ticket video game adaptation, takes a satirical, self-aware approach to the End Times .

“Sasquatch Sunset” follows the creatures as they go about their lives. We had so many questions. The film’s cast and crew had answers .

If you are overwhelmed by the endless options, don’t despair — we put together the best offerings   on Netflix , Max , Disney+ , Amazon Prime  and Hulu  to make choosing your next binge a little easier.

Sign up for our Watching newsletter  to get recommendations on the best films and TV shows to stream and watch, delivered to your inbox.