crash course essay writing

Study Skills

crash course essay writing

Exercise: Crash Course Study Skills #10

crash course essay writing

Papers & Essays: Crash Course Study Skills #9

crash course essay writing

Test Anxiety: Crash Course Study Skills #8

crash course essay writing

Studying for Exams: Crash Course Study Skills #7

crash course essay writing

Procrastination: Crash Course Study Skills #6

crash course essay writing

Focus & Concentration: Crash Course Study Skills #5

crash course essay writing

Planning & Organization: Crash Course Study Skills #4

crash course essay writing

Memory: Crash Course Study Skills #3

crash course essay writing

Reading Assignments: Crash Course Study Skills #2

crash course essay writing

Taking Notes: Crash Course Study Skills #1

crash course essay writing

Crash Course Study Skills Preview

crash course essay writing

Nerdfighteria Wiki

crash course essay writing

Popular articles

crash course essay writing

crashcourse Papers & Essays: Crash Course Study Skills #9

  • Description

  Intro (0:16-0:23)

  brain dump ( 1:53 ),  the research process ( 2:27 ),   "write drunk, edit sober." ( 4:24 ),   thought bubble ( 4:57 ),  end thought bubble ( 5:52 ),  editting ( 6:22 ),  credits ( 8:27 ), create account.

  • Log In / Register

Ottawa Public Library home

You are here

A crash course on essay writing: how to write an essay in 7 steps.

crash course essay writing

Apr 28, 2020

Studying form home? Have to write an essay for one of your classes but not sure where to start? Here is a quick, crash course on how to outline your essay to help you get started! This guide is intended to help you create the bare bones or the outline of your essay and to help you get started. You’ll have to go back in and flesh out your ideas and add quotes afterwards, but you should have a strong base after following these steps.

Step 1: Decide What You Want to Say

Regardless of if you’re writing a personal essay, a research essay, or a literary essay, you need to have an opinion or a point of view on the topic. So decide what idea matters to you enough to write about and then you can get started!

This idea is your thesis (the concept that you want to argue in your essay)

Example: Pizza is the best of all fast foods.

Step 2: Now Prove You’re Right

Awesome, you have something to say! You’ve come up with an interesting idea about what you’re reading/studying. Now you must back your idea up with arguments. Come up with 3 or 4 arguments (reasons why what your saying is true). The amount of arguments you need in your essay will depend on your teacher and their expectations. Three or four is a safe starting point.

These arguments are your points. (The arguments that support your thesis)

Example 2: Pizza is the best of all fast foods because: it’s cheap, it offers a variety of choices, and it tastes good.

Step 3: Give Evidence

Now that you have your 3 points, find some evidence that help support those points. It’s like in a trial. You can suggest that someone is guilty because they were at the scene of the crime, but unless you can prove they were there, your argument has no leg to stand on.

Example: The argument that pizza is cheap is supported by the fact that: (1) it is a cheap meal because the ingredients are inexpensive; (2) it is inexpensive to buy (roughly $20) relative to other fast foods like Chinese (closer to $40); (3) one pizza can feed a lot of people for a low cost (that $20 pizza can feed four people so you don’t need to order as much).

Step 4: Summarize Your Evidence

You now have three points which all have evidence backing them up. Now you need to wrap up your paragraph by explaining how this evidence and this point support your thesis.

This is called your explanation.

Example: Therefore, pizza is convenient and affordable for people who can or can’t cook, making it an excellent fast-food option.

Step 5: Introductions Are Like Funnels!

Now that you figured out your arguments, you need your introduction. The reason we don’t start with the introduction is because until you have your arguments, you don’t know what it is you’re introducing! Introductions can be difficult but it can help if you think of your introduction as a funnel. You want to start with something broad and general in the beginning, and then slowly narrow your focus to something specific.

crash course essay writing

Example: There are many delicious options when it comes to deciding on dinner. One of the most popular fast foods is pizza. Pizza is the best of all fast foods. This is because pizza is cheap, it offers a variety of choices, and it tastes better than any other take out foods.

Step 6: To Conclude…

Almost done! One last step! If your introduction is a funnel, your conclusion is a pyramid. What that means is you want to have specific information in the beginning and then end on a general note.

crash course essay writing

*****Quick note on conclusions: Your conclusion is not your introduction in reverse! You must restate your thesis and arguments in different words and end on a new topic, not what you started with in your intro. *****

Example: In conclusion, pizza is the best fast food. This is because it is inexpensive to make and to buy which means it is convenient and affordable for both people who do know how to cook and those who don’t. It also comes in a variety of forms which means that it can be customized to people’s choices and is easy to share with friends. Finally, pizza tastes delicious because the combination of flavors is one that appeals to most and it can be modified to include people’s favorite toppings. It will be interesting to see with the growing number of foodies in the world, whether pizza will evolve to suit more tastes and whether it will become a staple for meals other than Friday night dinner.

Step 7: Putting it All Together

Last step! Once you’ve finished all your paragraphs, organize them in this way:

crash course essay writing

**You want to organize your arguments this way so that you start and end strong when proving your point.

And there you have it! Your essay in seven steps!

If you still need help, here are some links with more information on essay structure:  English  resource,  French  resource. 

Blog post contributed by Maddie from our Greenboro branch.

Crash Course in Writing Effective Essays

Herman Rapaport

Wake Forest University - Department of English

This guide represents the views of the author alone. It is not a statement of departmental policy and does not necessarily accord with the views of colleagues who may have different ideas on various different matters. However, this guide does represent many dominant views in the profession of English with respect to composition and can be taken as a useful approach to writing in a university context. Its purpose is basic advice and guidance. Essentially this is the essence of what most composition books have to offer.

The purpose of an essay should be for you to articulate your thoughts in such a way that you learn something you otherwise couldn’t. In other words, the essay requires you to direct your thoughts in a logical and progressive fashion whose result is the discovery of meanings, relations, and processes that would otherwise remain inaccessible. Therefore the first rule of essay writing is that if you haven’t learned anything major as a result of your labors, your reader won’t either. And if you’ve learned absolutely nothing new, well, you’ve clearly failed the assignment. (That’s the acid test.)

Essays come in various forms. Description, definition, classification, argument, and comparison-contrast are some of the more typical. There are many fine books on writing that can teach you these forms, and I suggest you explore Barnes & Noble to find one that suits you. By studying such a “how to” book, you shouldn’t have to invent the wheel every time an assignment is due. This saves frustration, time, and will result in much better marks.

Judging from the many papers I’ve seen students write, it’s clear that not a few students are under the impression that an essay is supposed to be either a response or a summary of something. Or both. This is a pity, because the response and summary approaches are the weakest options that one could select, given that they are pre-critical approaches.

Consider that a summary is just a recounting of content, a literal paraphrase. That speaks to comprehension, but doesn’t speak to the capacity of anyone to have really understood the inferential meanings of what was written . Response is a matter of advancing opinions that are pre-analytical: not tied to a systematic argument or analysis. The summary and the response are encouraged in the lower schools where matters of comprehension (can the student literally read the text?) and opinion (can the student articulate his or her responses?) are considered fundamental. But given that you’re in a university, realize that the criteria are now different, since what faculty at a university are looking for is the capacity for critical thinking, which is demonstrated in terms of using analytical skills.

In German, the word for analysis is Auseinandersetzung , which literally means, among other things, something close to “taking the pieces of something apart and putting them next to one another.” This involves disassembly and posure [ Setzung ]: the taking apart of the object of study (e.g. the text), as well as its reassembly in a form that exposes its meanings, relations, and processes. Now the point to bear in mind is that this reassembly does not respect the original composition of the entity, but is a recomposition of it in a critical/analytical form. Your essay, it turns out, is this recomposition.

Let’s go back to the matter of summary. A summary simply repeats the original composition (form, sequence, manner of presentation, plot) in its original order. Nothing has been taken apart; everything has just been repeated. This is clearly non-analytical and inappropriate for the work we want to do at a university.

Response is actually quite similar to summary in that a response paper merely depicts the reactions of the author and does not engage in self-examination, empirical testing of the opinions against the text, or a logical interpretation of the text in which it is reconstructed and recomposed.

Neither summary nor response are self-reflexive. This is a failing in that self-reflexivity is a fundamental skill that belongs to critical thinking. Self-reflexivity asks not what is being said or thought, but why is such and such being said and thought? Self-reflexivity calls for critical self-examination as well as for critical examination of the object of study.

Related to these remarks on summary and response is the fact that a key developmental task for undergraduate writers is making the transition from descriptive to conceptual writing . Everyone can recount the plot of a story, but not everyone can conceptualize a plot. When Aristotle discovered rising and falling action in tragedy, he began conceptualizing the form that a plot has. One can observe the features of a character such as Pip in Great Expectations , but can one conceptualize what kind of character he is relative to other characters in the novel and what significance this has? The art of conceptualization is fundamental to satisfying the expectation that students ought to be capable of writing analytical papers. Analysis is not possible in the absence of conceptualization. Key is the transition from writing about what something looks like to writing about what something really is. Here one moves from description to definition. Always strive to define the terms, the order, and the relations you observe. Then draw principles from them, if you can. This is an advanced sort of skill that applies to logicians, I suppose, but it should be on our minds, in any case. What "constants" can we derive from what we are analysing?

Argumentation

Not surprising is that t he most common essay mode used in English courses is the argument paper. In an argument the author has come to some analytical conclusion that he or she will argue or prove in the course of the essay. For this conclusion to be valid, it has to be based on conceptual, analytical thinking, not rhetorical grand standing or opinion mongering. An argument paper only works to the extent that the points are logically being developed in a progressive manner.

To write an argument paper, you’ll need a notebook for writing down all the ideas you have about the question that the instructor has asked you to write about. Spend no more than twenty minutes at a time in attempting to get as many responses down as you can. (This is the precritical stage.) While you do this, attempt to work logically from one point to another. At first this won’t work out very well. But upon subsequent tries you’ll have more success. (This is the transition from precritical to critical.) While walking, doing dishes, or something like that, try to imagine how the first paragraph of a paper on your topic might read. Start dictating sentence one, go on to sentence two, etc. The more you do this, the easier this will become. Later, when you actually write your paper, you will already have a backlog of thoughts and patterns in your subconscious to draw from. This makes composition more spontaneous and less painful; most important, it speeds up the writing process by making composition more automatic. And this is what you want, because the more automatic the writing is, the more pleasurable it becomes and the better your brain can invent new and interesting ideas. The key here is having the project on your mind at times other than when you are sitting down to write. Above all, let your unconscious work on the paper. In other words, think about the project before going to sleep. The results may surprise you.

Before you start to write the essay, see if you’re feeling creative. Are the ideas naturally coming to you? Or are you all frustrated and out of sorts? If you pay attention to your thoughts and moods, you’ll figure out when the time is right for writing. It’s usually when you have a desire to think hard about the topic, or are “getting into it,” or feel anxious about getting to the project. To write productively, you’ll need a quiet place that won’t be interrupted/invaded by someone else. Turn off the phones. Be “incommunicado.” This is what writers like most – writing as total withdrawal from the world. But there are other approaches. You can work productively in extremely noisy places like restaurants where the background noise helps overcome the loneliness of being all alone in a room with nothing to say. I myself love to write in restaurants, though not all the time.

When you get close to starting, outline the project. Don’t use numbers or letters as in a formal outline. Just write out the major points you want to make and see if they progress logically. Look at the list and see if it makes sense. Is this something you’re going to feel okay about? Remember that the most logical sequence will make the most sense to you and your reader. And remember that logic is the basis for validity in an argument. (Go ask my colleagues in philosophy, if you don’t believe me.) If the argument isn’t logical, it isn’t valid. But more importantly, perhaps, if it isn’t logical, it won’t feel right mentally and will be hard to work with in terms of the writing. Logic is a great aid to composition, because it makes ideas fall naturally into line.

In a two thousand word essay (about eight pages of double spaced print) you only have space for three major topics in the body of the paper. Think about this. If you spend two pages per topic and one page for the introduction and one for the conclusion, that’s eight pages. Now imagine that your subject is about counterpoint in poetry. What are the three main topics going to be? Let me suggest these: 1) metrical counterpoint, 2) figural counterpoint, and 3) thematic counterpoint. Notice that we’re progressing from smaller units of meaning to larger units of meaning (small metrical units; somewhat larger figural entities like metaphors and symbols; to broader structures like theme which envelop and tie together the whole work). We’re also moving from the most abstract (meter) to the most content oriented material (theme) with figure as a middle point between the two.

What does this teach us? That an argument of a paper works best when a subject is divided into topics that have a natural architecture : abstract to concrete, small to large, easy to difficult, simple to complex. The first and last topic should be in opposition or high contrast, while the middle term is a median or middle plateau that ties the two extremes together. The basic form of such a triad would be “low, middle, high.” Consider these: “modes of production, modes of distribution, modes of consumption” [Marx]; “id, ego, superego” [Freud]; “signifier, signified, referent” [de Saussure]; Hell, Purgatory, Paradise [Dante].

Triadic architecture is really the one you should master first, before going on to the more difficult structure of twos. Jacques Lacan, for example, likes to work in duple structure (subjection/subversion; self/other; ideal ego/ego ideal). The difficulty here is that you’re forced to write in a dialectical mode wherein you go back and forth in a way that at some point requires an inversion of the polarities, if you expect to make any dialectical headway. When Marx contrasts ground rent (Medieval) to profit made from manufacturing (Industrial Revolution), he has to show how the second turns everything else in society and the economic order on its head. Hegel, who invented this method, has to do the same for his account of the Master/Slave relation: the slave, who seems to be in the disadvantaged position, is, at the end of the day, actually the Master. But in order to show this, everything has to be inverted, sort of like pulling at a glove so that it turns inside out.

A four part body will work, particularly if it is the result of the classification of a topic. See, for example, Jacques Lacan's Seminar 17 in which he discusses four discourses: of the Master, the Hysteric, the University, and the Analyst. Each discourse is composed of the same four mathemes that are structured in terms of a logical formula whose syntax is common to each discourse. All that changes is how the mathemes are positioned. This control of a four part analysis is quite virtuosic and shows what can be done by someone with genius.

Bear in mind that uneven structures generate tension in a way that an even four part structure may not. That's why you'll generally see one act, three act, or five act plays. Symphonies, which often have four movements, put a lot of stress on resolution in a way that is not quite the case for plays and essays. Plus Symphonies (sonatas, string quartets, etc.) emphasize the independence of those four movements in a way that's quite different from literary or essayistic texts that are generally concerned much more with linearity and linkage. Lastly, you’ll notice that academic books often structure their chapters in threes or fives, plus an introduction. But there are other possibilities, among them, the “open series” (cf. Theodor Adorno’s Minima Moralia , Walter Benjamin’s Arcades , Jacques Derrida's "Envois" from The Post Card , etc.).

I said earlier that an essay is the recomposition of the object of study . What this means, simply, from a compositional perspective, is that an essay should not prop its structure upon the structure of the work that is being studied. Many essays begin with a few generalizations and then dive into a “process reading” of a poem, novel, or film. This is almost always indicated by the sentence that begins with that dreaded preposition “in.” “In Thomas Hardy’s Return of the Native we experience the festivities of the bonfire…” What follows is the blow by blow description of the novel with some commentary thrown in. Every time I see the sentence that begins “In such and such’s novel…,” I get the impression of being at a horse race, “…and they’re off; it’s Sea Biscuit at the quarter turn ahead by a nose, followed by Golden Glove….” The race track metaphor is appropriate, because I can sense the security of running around a track that is prepared in advance: the plot or natural order of the novel. This means the writer doesn’t have to compose the order, he or she only has to follow what has already been mapped out in advance by the novelist. Once the writer has done all the turns and jumped all the hurdles (I’m thinking of horses again) the tired nags come to the finish line, their tongues hanging out of their mouths. If I’m being satirical, it’s because this is NOT what is supposed to happen in your essays.

Well, what are you supposed to do? You’re supposed to make up an order of your own that is different from that of the book. You should be working with an argument that directs what gets cited and when. You should be using only those parts of the book that fit the requirements of your argument. Do not let the book’s order determine your paper, because then the book you’re studying is writing your paper for you, which is a sign of passivity and uncritical thinking. Of course, there are times when the order of the work will coincide with the order of your presentation, but this should only occur for a limited time and for very good strategic reasons. Don’t prop an entire analysis upon the structure of the object.

Consider that by disassembling the object of study (the text) and recomposing it to fit your argument, you are exposing a logic that the natural order or surface features of the object cannot or do not literally reveal. In short, there is a difference between appearance and reality, and it is your mission to get at the reality, not the mere surface structure.

Revision/Organization

When writing an essay, it is best to leave the introductory page for last. Of course, writing a paper without a beginning can be disorienting, so prepare to write the introductory page twice, once for you and another time for your audience. Keep in mind that a fairly usual revision ratio is about 5 to 10 pages per page of finished text. If you think that’s extreme, it’s because you’ve never really gotten down to work, which requires much more time and discipline than you might imagine.

Since I'm on the topic of revision, the point of it is not only to proof-read, but to improve the composition in terms of gaining clarity. Perhaps even more important is that revisions produce deeper insights. A revision largely exists in order to push the ideas ahead into uncharted territories. This is done by working through implications and alternative possibilities, something that happens when you repeat the process word for word. As a rule, bear in mind that the more literal and commonplace the insight, the less value it has, because anyone can think it. Usually the sign of a good insight is that it forces you to realign or rewrite the whole paper. This is very good, though it has the downside of creating considerable work. Although you may want to avoid this, don’t. Writing is a labor intensive activity that unfolds one stage (re-vision) at a time. Keep in mind that what distinguishes an A from a B is not some magical je ne sais quoi , but the particularity and illumination of the insights. A paper that gets an A is a paper that is teaching the teacher. It can only do that if the writing is clear and the insights genuinely insightful.

That said, revision is something you should be doing to some extent every time you sit down to write, once you get some initial pages drafted. You can't be obsessive about revising, because you'll never finish, but every time you come back to work on the essay, tinker with that first paragraph, and move on sentence by sentence. What isn't being said here? What could be added that's better than what I've got? How can I get these two sentences to connect more logically? Is that the best word for the idea I have in mind? Can a reader follow what I'm saying? What's the logic of the argument? What precisely am I arguing here?

Once you do those revisions you'll be back into the frame of mind with which you were writing earlier. That is, revision gets you back to the place where you left off. This way of approaching revision differs, of course, from the idea that an essay should proceed by way of distinct separate drafts that are each composed from beginning to end, though there may come a time when that's needed. I myself only do that if I think the whole piece is seriously flawed and needs a complete tear down and reconstruction, or if I want to try out entirely different subject matter. But this is radical and very time consuming, because essentially I'm starting over.

The Introductory Paragraph

For a two thousand word paper, this paragraph should be about three quarters of a page long. Ideally it has a good opening sentence, a thesis sentence, and an agenda.

Opening sentences should not be tautologies (self-evident truths). Many students err in this, because they model their writing on what they’ve picked up in adverts and the business world, generally. In that realm, the tautology sets up the customer for a sales pitch. “Wouldn’t you like to be in Hawaii right now?” Well, who wouldn’t? Then comes the pitch. “Well, you can, and for only pennies a day.” That’s business. But you’re in academia. So avoid tautologies like, “The novel was very popular in England during the nineteenth century,” or, “Virginia Woolf’s writings have received many feminist analyses.” Since almost everyone obviously knows these things, it’s redundant to state them. Moreover, whereas tautologies establish common ground in advertising, they alienate readers in academe, because they insult the reader’s intelligence. In terms of marking papers, they alert the faculty member that the student is somewhat naïve and that this isn’t likely to be a very promising paper.

Well, what might be a good opening sentence? Here is Simone de Beauvoir’s famous opening to a chapter in The Second Sex : “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.” This opening sentence isn’t exactly a tautology, as the sentence immediately after it shows: “No biological, psychological, or economic fate determines the figure that the human female presents in society; it is civilization as a whole that produces this creature, intermediate between male and eunuch, which is described as feminine.” This is already the thesis of de Beauvoir’s essay. It’s her thesis that woman isn’t essentially (naturally) anything, but that woman is culturally determined by civilization as a whole. Well, what does she mean? How can she prove it? What are the consequences of this if this is so? It’s these questions that determine the trajectory of her inquiry.

Once the thesis has been sounded, the author needs an agenda . De Beauvoir has one, but it’s implicit, not explicit. Had she wanted to, however, she could have included a framing sentence like, “I wish to examine how one becomes a woman in terms of childhood, adolescence, and adulthood in order to show how there is from the beginning a conflict between woman’s autonomous existence and her objective self, her ‘being-the-other.’” The agenda, you will notice, sets up an order of discussion that is natural (a tripartite order) in that it progresses from child to adult. It provides an outline, schema, or overall conception that the reader can rely on for the sake of organizing the complex information that is to follow. And the agenda gives us a reason for why we’re going to be taken through the process reading that follows.

Now, why should you include an explicit agenda when de Beauvoir and other professional writers do not? Remember that in some courses your papers are being read among various other entries, and this means that the more help you can give the instructor in explicitly telling him or her what you’re doing, the easier it will be to grasp the paper and intelligently mark it. If the instructor has to stop and puzzle what on earth the student is doing, well, you can guess what’s going to happen to the mark. A thesis and an agenda provide clarity; they show how the paper is meant to fit together and pre-structure the whole for the reader. This is essential if you want to make a good impression on people who are marking many papers at a stretch. By the way, even in the business world, people want to know up front what they’re getting into. No one has the time to figure out a murky paper.

The thesis and agenda sentences usually come at the end of the first paragraph. (De Beauvoir’s opening was a bit idiosyncratic in that regard, but look at the example of a Milton paper intro. below in the Appendix.) This means that the opening sentence introduces the main topic; you develop a context within which the topic becomes of interest; and then you focus in on your specific argument or thesis and end with a programmatic agenda that tells us how your analysis is going to proceed. This way we get a snapshot of the whole and all we have to do as graders is take pleasure on how cleverly you’ve developed the main thought. If this is done reasonably well, it should get you in the B+ range. If it’s done brilliantly, an A is in order. Remember that compared to the muddled paper your neighbor may be handing in, you have an immense advantage if your paper sets up a clear argument, execution, and conclusion.

Middle Section

I’ve already discussed how this is supposed to be set up. Essentially, the middle section develops several topics in logical order before arriving at a conclusion section. It’s useful to know that each paragraph in this section needs to have a very definite purpose or function . Look at each paragraph and ask what it’s accomplishing. Play “weakest link.” Find those sentences and paragraphs that don’t earn their keep and get rid of them or strengthen them. Usually the problem is structural. The sentences or paragraphs are straying from the topic, or they’re repeating something you’ve already proven. (Yes, the mind is a funny thing: it repeats or loses the thread a lot.) Last, use topic sentences. These are sentences that frame the discussion of the paragraph and to which everything in the paragraph is to be subordinated. “This is, indeed, why jealousy can be insatiable.” This could work as a topic sentence that is transitioning from jealousy in general to a specific aspect of it, insatiability. Perhaps this is meant to bolster an argument about the force of jealousy. The point is that insatiability is a “key word” to which everything in the paragraph will have to relate. Remember, topic sentences contain “key words” or topics to which everything must be subordinated.

Conclusion Section

Ideally a conclusion shows that in demonstrating your thesis you have opened up an analytical can of worms. In other words, you haven’t just narcissistically proven yourself to be correct, but have shown that you have discovered something that is relevant for further considerations you don’t have time to get into, but could mention in closing. Ideally, you would show the validity of your argument plus its applicability to something else of greater significance than what you have proven. If you look at major essays by scientists and humanists, this is almost always the type of conclusion you’ll see.

A conclusion should be at least three quarters of a page long for a two thousand word piece. It should be dense and fully packed. It should have a strong conclusion sentence, as well. If you’ve actually learned something major in writing the paper, the conclusion will fall together almost automatically. If your paper hasn’t really delivered the goods, you’ll know it in terms of how hard the conclusion will be to compose.

Back in the seventeenth century there wasn’t much standardization. For example, both Shakespeare and Rembrandt spelled their own names variously (Shakespear, Shakespeare, Rembrant, Rembrandt, etc.). As the industry of printing books expanded, publishers edited manuscripts by way of standardizing punctuation for ease of reading. They realized that it would be more likely for a book to sell if readers could easily decipher where sentences began and ended, where phrases in the middle of sentences occurred, where quotations began and ended, and so forth. As the conventions of signaling this information became more and more standardized, it became an expectation that writers would adhere to these conventions so that printers wouldn’t have to start editing a manuscript from scratch. Eventually, it became an expectation that everyone adhere to these conventions, given that they were so ubiquitous.

Of course, sloppy punctuation, where it occurs, is not just a matter of breaking the conventions, but of not understanding how grammar works. When students use commas where periods ought to be used, they’re telling their professors that they don’t know what a sentence is. Equally problematic are pronoun reference errors (what does the “it” refer to?), apostrophe mistakes, dangling modifiers (“grunting and squealing the kids chased the pigs over the fence”), fused sentences (two sentences without a period between them), and the unintended sentence fragment. All of these mistakes tell teachers and future employers that “you ain’t learned nothin’ in school.” Of course, this isn’t really the case. But judging by appearances, you can easily get type-cast as an educated know-nothing if your prose is bad. Make sure you understand the basic usage errors and proofread for them before handing in work. Speaking of which: do get hold of the Chicago Manual of Style – 15 th Edition ( University of Chicago Press), which is the bible of proof-readers and look at chap. 5 on grammar. That section is probably the most easy and comprehensible guide there is and well worth the price of the book, though the Manual has much more that ought to be of use to you. (Unfortunately, there's no paperback edition, and it costs close to fifty dollars--Ouch! So get one used or check one out of the library. Reference Desk sections usually have one on hand.)

Even if you’re not a specialist in how to punctuate prose, I bet you’re aware that no punctuation mark is more elusive than the comma. So a few remarks on comma usage are in order.

Bear in mind that there are two styles for using the comma, closed and open . The open form uses as few commas as possible. The closed form uses many commas. Open form is cheaper and easier to typeset, and therefore newspapers and magazines prefer this style. But let’s see which makes the most sense and why.

ex. a. The novelist Joseph Conrad who was intent on finishing his work managed to finish Nostromo in a very short but anxiety ridden time.

ex. b. The novelist, Joseph Conrad, who was intent on finishing his work, managed to finish Nostromo in a very short, but anxiety ridden time.

Both examples are perfectly legitimate from the perspective of punctuation. But which is better ? It is hard to tell on the basis of one sentence alone. So consider what you might think if you read five, ten, or fifty pages of relatively unpunctuated prose. Chances are you would find yourself doing more work as a reader than if you had to deal with all the commas. Why? Because when I don’t do the punctuation, you have to. In the context of reading a newspaper article, where all the sentences are short, this isn’t a problem. But in the context of academic prose, where sentences can get to be quite long, it would help to have some commas, indicating the grammatical function of the clauses. Without all the commas, we tend to get confused as to what is modifying what. This argues rather persuasively for closed style.

So where do those commas go? Commas usually set off introductory subordinate clauses. “If I were you, I wouldn’t do that.” “When the missile crisis started, no one knew exactly how to respond diplomatically.” “At around midnight, the revolution was over.” In the case of prepositional introductory phrases, there is discretion about whether the comma is inserted. And this is what confuses many people. Was my “At around midnight…” sentence okay? Shouldn’t it read, “At around midnight the revolution was over”? There’s a hidden hand at work in making this decision that is known as the restricted/non-restricted opposition. Restricted refers to a non-essential entity ; non-restricted refers to an essential entity . If something is restricted, it is set off by itself, because it isn’t essential to the thought. If something is non-restricted, it is essential to the thought and cannot be discarded or set apart. If I put that comma after “midnight,” I’m saying the clause is restricted and not essential to the meaning. If I leave that comma out, the time of “midnight” becomes essential to the end of the revolution. Since the time was probably incidental, it should be set off with a comma. But you couldn’t do this in a case like, “During the month of October[,] the Communist Revolution was won.” After all, we’re talking about the October Revolution in which the month is closely tied to the idea of the Revolution itself. There the comma would be in error.

While we’re on the restricted/non-restricted bit, “which” and “that” obey this law, as well. Which introduces clauses that are restricted and set off by commas. That introduces non-restricted clauses. Compare, “The day that was to turn out badly for Tim couldn’t be salvaged” to “The day, which was to turn out badly for Tim, couldn’t be salvaged.” Tim is a major actor in the first example, a minor actor in the second. In recent decades publishers have tried to wipe out all uses of which, though which is slowly making a comeback. There’s a long and interesting history of that/which. (Writers of English haven’t been able to stabilize its use over the last four hundred years or so.)

Commas are also used to set off appositions . “The philosopher, Kierkegaard, was a melancholic.” Appositions are parenthetical and tell the reader what is being referred to in mid-stream. The clause using which in the previous paragraph is appositional. The reason for appositions is that you can embed subordinate details into a sentence. Frequently, appositions allow one to embed several complex ideas into one sentence structure. Experiment with appositions and mark off with commas.

The comma is used before coordinating conjunctions when they introduce independent clauses. “John ate honey, and Jill ate bitters.” Compare with, “John ate honey and Jill bitters.” There is no comma in the second instance. But bear in mind that there are many instances with the coordinating conjunction “but” where you will probably mark it off with a comma, even if it introduces a dependent clause. You saw me do it above, for example, in order to better define the logical importance of the sentence’s parts.

Commas separate parts of a list . When these parts become too long and involved, use semi-colons instead. Mind the use of commas when separating adjectives. “The dark brown horse” is one thing; “the dark, brown horse” is another. Or, “She had blue, beautiful eyes” versus “She had blue beautiful eyes.” I prefer there to be the version of the eyes being blue and also being beautiful, as opposed to being beautiful but also blue. The concrete term should carry the abstraction along with it, not the other way around. So who cares about these commas, anyway? Individually they are not earthshaking. But cumulatively they make the difference between a clearly articulated text and a hodgepodge. Not minding your commas is like not minding the termites. Eventually the roof will cave in.

  1. The parts of a sentence or essay that have the most impact are, in the following order, the end, the beginning, and the middle.

2. Most of your sentences should be complex or compound or compound-complex in form.

3. The simple sentence is an intensifier. Use it as such.

4. The simple sentence carries the most impact when it comes at the end of a paragraph. It carries the second most impact when it comes at the beginning. It has no impact if it comes in the middle of a paragraph.

5. If you’re going to say something stupid, say it in the middle. Because no one particularly remembers what was said in the middle.

6. People naturally gravitate to one of the three following styles: 1) antithesis, 2) anaphora, 3) apposition. Find out which you favor and exploit it. Then practice the others for good balance.

Antithesis: “It was the best of times; it was the worst of times.”

Anaphora: “It was the best of times, the hardest of times, the greatest of times, and the worst of times.”

Apposition: “It was, as far as times were concerned, the best, if not the hardest, and the worst, if not the greatest.

7. Writing is like a painting with elements in the foreground and the background. Make sure readers can tell what is supposed to stand out from what isn’t. To do this, background and foreground vocabulary. Use everyday words for the background and special terms or key words for the foreground. Most of the vocabulary should be commonplace words. Save “sobriquet” and “detritus” for special occasions only.

8. Telling is better than showing. Readers need to be told what to think.

9. Showing is better than telling. Unsupported assertions aren't persuasive.

10. Avoid the words "it" and "thing." This will make your prose more efficient and combat wordyness.

11. Semi-colons can be avoided entirely, and whole books have been written without them. So that's one less mistake we have to worry about.

12. Avoid parentheses. These are garbage trucks for prose and usually indicate patches where a writer couldn't properly fit in the ideas.

13. "I" and "you" are generally unacceptable in formal analytical essays. That said, in recent years informal writing has become more and more common in academic prose. I'm okay with informal writing, but other instructors might have different expectations.

14. Don't wait until a week before an essay assignment is due to begin working on it. You should plan out essay projects well in advance and think about them. An essay shouldn't be a chore. Think of it as a creative process that you should find rewarding as you solve various problems that you're addressing in your research and writing. Above all, have fun with it. Challenge yourself to overcome the demands of the project.

                                           Appendix

    Models of a Proper Introduction to a Literary Analysis Paper

Freshman Student Paper on Steinbeck:

In Grapes of Wrath of 1939, George Steinbeck considers the economic and social difficulties faced by an Oklahoman family during the Great Depression. The novel includes a sharp critique of capitalist alienation, as the author condemns the injustice suffered when those who labor on the land, and who are most personally linked to it, find out that they have no legal right to remain there. While this critique of capitalist alienation is hard to miss, a closer examination of the text reveals various other forms of alienation that economic hardships and the deification of corporations creates. Steinbeck depicts a world in which family members are alienated from one another, critizens are at odds with their communities, and powerful men are separated from personal responsibity and their moral codes. Essentially these forms of alienation result from putting the pursuit of wealth ahead of caring for social relationships.

The thesis is that while alienation from the land is a dominant form of alienation that Steinbeck chooses to highlight, there are various other types of alienation that require definition and analysis. The second to last sentence lists three types of alienation that will set the agenda for the paper. The topics on this agenda structure the body of the paper. The conclusion of the paper will argue that instead of being any one thing, alienation refers to a number of attacks by the capitalist system on how people are connected: to land, to family, to community, to morality.

Senior Paper on Milton's Paradise Lost .

     Milton’s elaboration of Genesis throughout the first ten books of Paradise Lost results in a psychological complexity of character that is hard to reconcile with the poem’s simplistic ending: the return to God. By the poem’s conclusion, the reader not only understands the decision of Adam and Eve to eat the apple, but empathizes with the tragic couple to such an extent that it becomes thinkable to imagine why they might not want to return to God after being expelled from Eden. Milton therefore has to confront the problem of resolving the disparity between accepting God's goodness and suspecting that something unfair has happened to Adam and Eve by way of an unjust God whose ”many Laws argue so many sins” (xii, 281). Not surprisingly, Adam asserts, “This yet I apprehend not” (281).  And, of course, the reader shares Adam’s confusion. Apparently, if the ending of the poem is to be convincing, Milton must create reparation in such a way that it can be accepted by Adam and Eve, who are by now psychologically mature, their eyes having been opened. We can see that Milton works on this problem by putting book nine, on the fall of Adam and Eve, in conversation with book twelve, which is on the exile of Adam and Eve. The relation between the two books is established in three major ways. (1) Structurally each book follows a similar trajectory that enacts a moment of fall and estrangement. (2) Descriptively there is an emphasis on shadows and darkness that not only establishes relations of mood between the two books, but that also establishes the state of mind that will characterize Adam and Eve’s relation to their sin. (3) Finally, thematic motifs in book twelve recall earlier books, book nine among them, and create a means of binding Adam and Eve back to God, even as they experience their distance from him.

The opening sentence is a rather specific insight that could only come about through a detailed examination of the text. In other words, the paper begins with a conclusion to substantial thinking that has occurred before the paper starts. This opening leads into the central thesis of the essay, which is that in order for the poem to be successful, it has to reconcile the alienation of Adam and Eve with their capacity to accept and love God. We can see Milton working this out in relating books 12 and 9. In other words, there is a very methodical process at work in the poem, relative to the thesis, that the student is going to expose. And that process can be divided into three parts (the agenda of the paper). Bear in mind that the thesis gets at a significant problem. Most writers wouldn't have been able to pull off the reconciliation with God as a plausible or satisfactory ending, and close analysis shows that Milton must have been quite aware of the fact that without a satisfactory reconciliation, the poem would have fallen apart. As it happens, some readers have not been convinced by the ending.

The Anecdotal Opener: anecdotes can prove an important point and are useful in setting the stage for exploring a particular topic. Here is an anecdote as told by Roman Jakobson and Stephen Rudy in an essay on poetry.

Paul Valery, both a poet and an inquisitive theoretician of poetry as an 'art of language,' recalls the story of the painter Degas, who loved to write poems, yet once complained to Mallarme that he felt unable to achieve what he wanted in poetry despite being 'full of ideas.' Mallarme's apt reply was: "It's not with ideas, my dear Degas, that one writes verse. It's with words." [Source: Roman Jakobson, Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time , Minnesota UP, 1985; p. 79]

The Quarrelling Opener begins by outlining a debate and is a good way to situate a field of inquiry; it builds upon previous research.

Although it has long been a staple of criticism that whatever is good in Pope's Windsor Forest is to be found in its lively descriptions of the natural scene, a parallel critical tradition claims, as one of its exponents puts it, that the poem fails in its intent to be descriptive because it is 'too conventional and formal' -- it must be read as primarily an exercise in style. [Source: Earl Wasserman, The Subtler Language . Hopkins UP, 1959; p. 45]

Opening in Medias Res. This approach starts by citing a passage from a text, as if to plunge directly into an explication. I'm citing the opening to my own essay on the performance artist Laurie Anderson.

'Hello. Excuse me. Can you tell me where I am?' A voice unsure about a turn made in a car at night is asking for directions. 'Hello. Excuse me,' the voice says, aware of its hollowness, its presistence. 'Hello . . .'   Searching for its whereabouts on a darkened nightclub stage, the voice of Laurie Anderson casts us deep into the precarious loneliness and awkwardness of postmodern space. It is here that saying 'hello' sounds life-threatening. . . [ Between the Sign and the Gaze , Cornell UP, 1994; p. 268]

Problematization as Opening. Here the author begins by stating a problem or quandary.

An experience recurs in the study of Renaissance literature and culture: an image or text seems to invite, even to demand, a psychoanalytic approach and yet turns out to baffle or elude that approach. [Source: Stephen Greenblatt, Learning to Curse , Routledge, 1990; p. 131.]

The Factual Opener. This is usually a short sentence that states a fact or principle that announces the topic of the paper or leads into it. This is probably the most common approach.

The malcontent is a type as old as the hills, perhaps as old as writing itself. [Source: Walter Benjamin, "An Outsider Makes his Mark," in Selected Writings , vol. 2. Harvard UP, 2000.]

Some Reliable Critical Writing Models to Follow

Consult work by: Erich Auerbach, J. Hillis Miller, Cleanth Brooks,

Marjorie Perloff, Susan Sontag, George Steiner, Frank Kermode, Hugh

Kenner, Roger Shattuck, Edward Said, and (the art historians) Clement

Greenberg, Harold Rosenberg, Hilton Kramer, and T. J. Clark. Last, compare

Viriginia Woolf's style in The Common Reader to Paul de Man's style in

Allegories of Reading . In working out the strengths and weaknesses in

each, triangulate where you would like to stand in relation to each. You may

learn something about yourself if you do this exercise.

Text: ©Herman Rapaport, 2003, 2008, 2012.

Planet Apostrophe

There are too many Georges in this room. [Plural.]

George's car broke down. [Possessive singular.]

George's and John's tennis rackets were missing. [Individual possession in which each possesses something of his own.]

George and John's holiday was ruined. [Joint possession.]

We saw the Georges' cat eat Milly's annoying canary. [Possessive plural for family name.]

Descartes's theory. Descartes' theory. [Possessive singular for word ending in s -- really no hard and fast rule upon which to use, but publishers prefer the first variant; Descarteses if we're talking about the whole family of people called Descartes. Looks ugly, doesn't it? Most of us do a work-around.]

It's going to rain. [Contraction for It is.]

The cat bit its head right off. [Pronoun.]

Avoid possessives for inanimate objects, i.e. "The machine's cogs were stuck due to a spanner." Revision: "The cogs of the machine were stuck due to a spanner." No possessive for ideas or concepts, either. Avoid: "Realism's problem is obvious."

Non sequitur: two thoughts that do not have any logical connection. "The bars are full because Mary ate a turnip."

Tautology : self-evident statement. "Water is wet." If you can imagine a reader responding with "duh," you've probably written a tautology.

Changing the Topic : switching horses in mid-stream. This commonly happens in introductions.

Laundry Listing : moving from one topic to another without any particular plot line or clear argument. This constitutes writing by free association (by whatever comes to mind).

Point No Counterpoint: making assertions without taking into account that their validity is limited and easily countered by opposing views.

Lack of Evidence : not taking the time to show proof for assertions that aren't self-evidently true.

Mistaking particular for universal : claiming that because something is true in one case it is true in all cases.

Assumption blindness : not being aware of what your argument or approach assumes to be the case and the limits those assumptions might have.

The Seven Deadly Sins

1. Run-on sentences.

2. Comma splices

3. Dangling participles

4. Pronoun reference errors

5. Verb/Noun disagreements

6. Sentence fragments

7. Apostrophe errors

crash course essay writing

Mind the Conjunctions

Coordinating Conjunctions:

and, but, for...

Think of these as logical operators.

And adds something.

But retracts or subtracts something.

For , because : give us a reason or result.

Conjunctive Adverbs :

moreover, furthermore... (aka and )

however (aka but )

therefore, consequently (aka for )

Conjunctive adverbs are intensifiers. They're more emphatic ways of saying and, but, and for. When they come at the beginning of sentences in order to make a strong logical connection, they have to be set off by a period or semi-colon and followed by a comma. "They condemned Jack Sparrow to the gallows; however, Jack was innocent."

In troubleshooting writing, it's very useful to track whether one has used enough conjunctive adverbs to help the reader out logically. Also, from a structural point of view, it's useful to note where these logical operators are located in the paragraphs. If you start out a sentence with "However," does this mark a new line of reasoning? If so, you might be at a paragraph break without quite realizing it. "Therefore" may also signal you ought to break into a new paragraph. But "furthermore" clearly doesn't suggest we ought to be breaking paragraphs quite yet. Getting the logical operators to line up with the structuring of the writing will help enormously in clarifying academic prose , especially when one is writing quite a lot of material (upwards of 2000 words).

Fault! Don't ever substitute "on the other hand" for "however," unless it's preceded by "on the one hand." Academics themselves often make this mistake (faulty parallelism).

Fault! Don't substitute "as well as" for "and," unless it's absolutely necessary to do so. "He liked baseball as well as football" is a comparison. He liked one just as much as the other. But writers frequently substitute "as well as" when they're just adding on information. "She went to the store as well as to the park" should be: "She went to the store and to the park."

crash course essay writing

  • The Open University
  • Guest user / Sign out
  • Study with The Open University

OpenLearn

My OpenLearn Profile

Personalise your OpenLearn profile, save your favourite content and get recognition for your learning

Essay and report writing skills

Essay and report writing skills

Course description

Course content, course reviews.

Writing reports and assignments can be a daunting prospect. Learn how to interpret questions and how to plan, structure and write your assignment or report. This free course, Essay and report writing skills, is designed to help you develop the skills you need to write effectively for academic purposes.

Course learning outcomes

After studying this course, you should be able to:

  • understand what writing an assignment involves
  • identify strengths and weaknesses
  • understand the functions of essays and reports
  • demonstrate writing skills.

First Published: 10/08/2012

Updated: 26/04/2019

Rate and Review

Rate this course, review this course.

Log into OpenLearn to leave reviews and join in the conversation.

Richard Walker

Create an account to get more

Track your progress.

Review and track your learning through your OpenLearn Profile.

Statement of Participation

On completion of a course you will earn a Statement of Participation.

Access all course activities

Take course quizzes and access all learning.

Review the course

When you have finished a course leave a review and tell others what you think.

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

About this free course

Become an ou student, download this course, share this free course.

JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser.

Help Centre

Writing an academic essay

Choose a start date.

  • Taught: Mon, Evening
  • Time: 18:00 - 19:30
  • Dates: 15 April 2024 - 03 June 2024
  • Location: Online
  • Tutors: Sinead Keegan
  • Taught: Wed, Evening
  • Dates: 02 October 2024 - 06 November 2024
  • Taught: Tue, Evening
  • Dates: 21 January 2025 - 25 February 2025

Course Code: HCS24

  • Dates: 15/04/24 - 03/06/24

Duration: 6 sessions (over 8 weeks)

  • Tutor: Sinead Keegan

Choose a start date  

Download form & post

Any questions? [email protected] or call 020 4582 0415

Please note: We offer a wide variety of financial support to make courses affordable. Just visit our online Help Center for more information on a range of topics including fees, online learning and FAQs.

What is the course about?

This course is a practical, step by step, guide on how to write an academic essay for Humanities/Social Science undergraduate degrees or A Level/Access courses. It is NOT a spelling, punctuation or grammar course (see the English, Maths and ESOL Department if you need help with spelling, punctuation and grammar). Full-time students may pay the concessionary rate for this course. To claim the concessionary fee as a full-time student, please book via our Enrolments line on (telephone temporarily unavailable). Students say: "It was very comprehensive - I learnt more than I expected"; "It was helped me prepare for my studies"; "The tutor was super-friendly and offered so much support"; "It was interactive and everything was explained well and in detail." . This is a live online course. You will need: - Internet connection. The classes work best with Chrome. - A computer with microphone and camera is best (e.g. a PC/laptop/iMac/MacBook), or a tablet/iPad/smart phone/iPhone if you don't have a computer. - Earphones/headphones/speakers. We will contact you with joining instructions before your course starts.

What will we cover?

Amongst the topics covered are: time management, interpreting the essay question, essay and paragraph structure (beginnings, middles and ends) and academic style.

What will I achieve? By the end of this course you should be able to...

- Interpret an essay question. - Apply essay structure (introduction, main points and conclusions). - Produce a persuasive argument based on good essay/paragraph structure.

What level is the course and do I need any particular skills?

This course is appropriate for those students preparing for, or in the process of completing, undergraduate study in Humanities or the Social Sciences. The course will have more limited use if you are preparing for, or completing, other degree studies. Although aimed at a higher level, it could also be of use for those studying A levels or Access courses in the Humanities and Social Sciences. While basic essay writing is taught in this course you will need a good level of written English in order to complete university level assignments. As stated above this is not a spelling, punctuation or grammar course. You should also be able to read and comment upon short texts aimed at undergraduate Humanities and Social Science students.

How will I be taught, and will there be any work outside the class?

Tutor input, group activities and independent work in the class. The course will entail 3 x 30 minute small group tutorials (one at the beginning of the course, one at the middle and one at the end). Students are encouraged to ask questions in every session. All writing courses at City Lit will involve an element of workshop. This means that students will produce work which will be discussed in an open and constructive environment with the tutor and other students. The college operates a policy of constructive criticism, and all feedback on another student’s work by the tutor and other students should be delivered in that spirit. For classes longer than one day regular reading and writing exercises will be set for completion at home to set deadlines. City Lit Writing endeavours to create a safe and welcoming space for all and we strongly support the use of content notes in our classes. This means that learners are encouraged to make their tutor and classmates aware in advance if any writing they wish to share contains material that may be deemed sensitive. If you are unsure about what might constitute sensitive content, please ask your tutor for further clarification and read our expectations for participating in writing courses at City Lit .

Are there any other costs? Is there anything I need to bring?

Just paper and pens.

When I've finished, what course can I do next?

You may wish to consider a course in your area of interest in the Humanities Department or focus on your grammar (see Brush Up Your Grammar). All students are invited to join us at Late Lines , our regular performance night for City Lit writers. Students are also encouraged to submit their work to Between the Lines , our annual anthology of creative writing. For the latest news, courses and events, stay in touch with the Department on Facebook and Twitter .

Sinead Keegan is a writer, editor, and lecturer with an MFA in writing. She lectures in creative and critical writing at Kingston University and London Metropolitan University in addition to City Lit. She also teaches in her community, for organisations such as the British Council, and writes on a freelance basis for major corporate publications, websites and private clients. Her poetry and short stories have been published and anthologised widely including in Magma, The Lake, and Sheila-Na-Gig Online.

Please note: We reserve the right to change our tutors from those advertised. This happens rarely, but if it does, we are unable to refund fees due to this. Our tutors may have different teaching styles; however we guarantee a consistent quality of teaching in all our courses.

Coffee cup and open notebook

crash course essay writing

Personal Essay Writing Crash Course

From: $ 110.00 / month for 3 months

Grades:  10th–12th

Live class:  Thurs. 12:00–1:00 p.m. ET

Dates (Summer 2):  Jul 8–Aug 23, 2024

Prepaid:  $299

Instructor:  Farrar Williams

See Reviews of Instructor Farrar Williams

  • More Information

Required Texts

  • Reviews (0)

Course Description

Writing about yourself, your experiences, and your own perspective can be hard. It’s also something that a lot of students don’t get enough practice with as they focus on academic writing in most courses. However, personal narratives and perspectives are a focus of most college applications. In this summer mini-course, students will get a crash course in how to create a personal essay. We’ll take the essay process through brainstorming, drafting, revising, and polishing. Students will emerge from the class with a solid personal statement essay as well as several shorter writing pieces.

For students who are rising seniors, they can potentially use this essay for the Common Application and other college applications. For younger students, the course provides a chance to dive into memoirs and hone their writing and revising skills.

Course Structure

Our weekly meeting will be used to brainstorm and workshop as well as include lessons about personal essays and engaging your reader with beautiful or eye-catching writing. Work is paced out so that while students will create a single, polished essay by the end of the course, they will work on that essay and other assignments in a step by step way. The first half of the course also contains short essay reading assignments.

Who should enroll?

Rising seniors who would like to write their personal statement essay for college over the summer. Rising sophomores and juniors who enjoy writing and would like to try writing about themselves or who would like to get a head start on understanding how to write a personal essay for college.

Technology Requirements

  • High-speed, broadband Internet
  • Sound card and microphone (for live sessions)
  • Streaming video capabilities to watch recorded lectures

Evaluation and Feedback

My goal as an educator is always to help your student move forward in their skills with writing. Students start in different places. This is why I give extensive feedback on writing assignments and make myself available to meet with students about their essays. Grades for this course will only reflect having completed the work and participated in the assignments. They will not be evaluative of writing. All evaluation will come through narrative feedback.

Communication

Communication is through Canvas. Parents and students are encouraged to reach out.

There are no required materials for this course. I will provide essay models for short reading assignments. I will also provide a list of suggested resources for further essay explorations.

There are no reviews yet.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your review  *

Name  *

Email  *

Instructor Bio

crash course essay writing

Farrar Williams

Farrar Williams is a longtime educator with experience teaching in a variety of settings and levels. She has her undergraduate degree in history from Mount Holyoke College and her master’s in education and teaching from Goddard College. Farrar spent many years as a humanities teacher and administrator at a small Quaker middle school, where she honed her belief that education is a process, not a product, and that the goal is to bring out each student’s individual light. For the last decade and a bit, she has been homeschooling her sons, writing, and teaching in homeschool co-ops and drama groups. In addition to teaching, she’s currently an educational consultant and works with homeschool families on college admissions. When not teaching or working, Farrar is probably solving sudoku, reading a YA novel, or trying to resist putting in another batch of peanut butter chocolate chip cookies. She lives in Washington, DC. Contact: fwilliams[at]aimacademy.online

(more…)

All classes taught by Farrar Williams

crash course essay writing

Graphic Novels

crash course essay writing

Film as Literature

crash course essay writing

History of Africa and Asia

crash course essay writing

AP World History

Registration is open for 24-25 school year. Dismiss

logo-2

College Essay Writing Crash Course

Join us on Wednesday, October 4 at 4:00 PM PT / 7:00 PM ET to discover the secret sauce to strong essay writing with Collegewise Founder and Chief Eating Officer, Kevin McMullin!

About this Event

Did you know students can write upwards of a dozen college essays for their application? In this webinar, our experts will share their proven techniques on how to overcome writer’s block and write impressive college application essays. You’ll discover: + The difference between the personal statement and supplemental essay + How to approach essay writing that’s impressive and effective + What to avoid in essay writing + And much more! Register now and take essay writing to the next level with our expert strategies.

How to write a college transfer essay

Your Speakers

Kevin McMullin

Kevin McMullin

Chief Education Officer

Kevin McMullin is the founder and Chief Education Officer at Collegewise. For more than 25 years, he has been speaking, writing, and consulting with families and schools on the topic of smarter, saner college planning. Kevin also admits that while he knows a lot about how to parent teens during the college admissions process, he seems to be significantly less knowledgeable about how to parent his own 7- and 5-year-old boys. 

About Collegewise

Since 1999, our team of 80+ counselors has dedicated their expertise to creating a worry-free, effortless college application process for students of all levels. 

Collegewise empowers students academically and relieves parents of their project management duties through our personalized counseling and tutoring programs. 

Say goodbye to application stress and welcome a new, streamlined experience with Collegewise. 

website statistic

crash course essay writing

All Formats

Resource types, all resource types.

  • Rating Count
  • Price (Ascending)
  • Price (Descending)
  • Most Recent

Crash course essay writing

Preview of Study Skills Worksheets | Study Skills Activities | Crash Course Worksheets

Study Skills Worksheets | Study Skills Activities | Crash Course Worksheets

crash course essay writing

Analysis Booklets & Writing Mini-Unit: Use with ANY Essay !

crash course essay writing

Crash Course Quilt: Alternative to Traditional DBQ Essay

crash course essay writing

CrashCourse Study Skills Papers and Essays (episode 9)

Preview of Critical Thinking Activities, Ethics, Utilitarianism, digital, Crash Course©

Critical Thinking Activities, Ethics, Utilitarianism, digital, Crash Course ©

crash course essay writing

  • Google Apps™
  • Internet Activities

Preview of Expository Essay Writing Course (aligns Common Core)

Expository Essay Writing Course (aligns Common Core)

crash course essay writing

English I Crash Course Notes (Designed for Texas' English I STAAR Test)

crash course essay writing

Advanced Placement Literature Bootcamp / Crash Course / All Essays Handbook

crash course essay writing

  • Word Document File

Preview of AP World History Modern Crash Course : The DBQ

AP World History Modern Crash Course : The DBQ

crash course essay writing

Crash Course Composition #11-15 (Context, Rhetorical Appeals, Persuasion)

crash course essay writing

ACT Writing Crash Course (Google Slides)

crash course essay writing

  • Google Slides™

Preview of Crash Course Composition #1-5 - The Writing Process

Crash Course Composition #1-5 - The Writing Process

Preview of Crash Course Composition #6-10 (Editing, Citations, Arguing, Rhetoric)

Crash Course Composition #6-10 (Editing, Citations, Arguing, Rhetoric)

Preview of AP USH Crash Course : The DBQ

AP USH Crash Course : The DBQ

Preview of Teaching the AP Euro Long Essay - 3 Day Lesson Using Unit 1

Teaching the AP Euro Long Essay - 3 Day Lesson Using Unit 1

crash course essay writing

Papers and Essays : Crash Course Study Skills Ep 9

crash course essay writing

Lord of the Flies/John Green's Crash Course Discussion Notes

crash course essay writing

Papers and Essays : Crash Course Study Skills Ep 9 Google Classroom

Preview of Writer's Toolkit- A Crash Course

Writer's Toolkit- A Crash Course

crash course essay writing

The Great Gatsby Essay Writing Prompts

crash course essay writing

English II State Test Crash Course

crash course essay writing

Crash Course Geography Episode #1 What is Geography? Notes & Writing Activity

crash course essay writing

Crash Film (2004): Compelling Essay Topics

crash course essay writing

Crash Course Sociology #2 Major Sociological Paradigms - Video Questions

crash course essay writing

  • We're hiring
  • Help & FAQ
  • Privacy policy
  • Student privacy
  • Terms of service
  • Tell us what you think
  • Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Guest Essay

The Most Important Writing Exercise I’ve Ever Assigned

An illustration of several houses. One person walks away from a house with a second person isolated in a window.

By Rachel Kadish

Ms. Kadish is the author of the novel “The Weight of Ink.”

“Write down a phrase you find abhorrent — something you yourself would never say.”

My students looked startled, but they cooperated. They knew I wouldn’t collect this exercise; what they wrote would be private unless they chose to share it. All that was required of them was participation.

In silence they jotted down a few words. So far, so good. We hadn’t yet reached the hard request: Spend 10 minutes writing a monologue in the first person that’s spoken by a fictitious character who makes the upsetting statement. This portion typically elicits nervous glances. When that happens, I remind students that their statement doesn’t represent them and that speaking as if they’re someone else is a basic skill of fiction writers. The troubling statement, I explain, must appear in the monologue, and it shouldn’t be minimized, nor should students feel the need to forgive or account for it. What’s required is simply that somewhere in the monologue there be an instant — even a fleeting phrase — in which we can feel empathy for the speaker. Perhaps she’s sick with worry over an ill grandchild. Perhaps he’s haunted by a love he let slip away. Perhaps she’s sleepless over how to keep her business afloat and her employees paid. Done right, the exercise delivers a one-two punch: repugnance for a behavior or worldview coupled with recognition of shared humanity.

For more than two decades, I’ve taught versions of this fiction-writing exercise. I’ve used it in universities, middle schools and private workshops, with 7-year-olds and 70-year-olds. But in recent years openness to this exercise and to the imaginative leap it’s designed to teach has shrunk to a pinprick. As our country’s public conversation has gotten angrier, I’ve noticed that students’ approach to the exercise has become more brittle, regardless of whether students lean right or left.

Each semester, I wonder whether the aperture through which we allow empathy has so drastically narrowed as to foreclose a full view of our fellow human beings. Maybe there are times so contentious or so painful that people simply withdraw to their own silos. I’ve certainly felt that inward pull myself. There are times when a leap into someone else’s perspective feels impossible.

But leaping is the job of the writer, and there’s no point it doing it halfway. Good fiction pulls off a magic trick of absurd power: It makes us care. Responding to the travails of invented characters — Ahab or Amaranta, Sethe or Stevens, Zooey or Zorba — we might tear up or laugh, or our hearts might pound. As readers, we become invested in these people, which is very different from agreeing with or even liking them. In the best literature, characters are so vivid, complicated, contradictory and even maddening that we’ll follow them far from our preconceptions; sometimes we don’t return.

Unflinching empathy, which is the muscle the lesson is designed to exercise, is a prerequisite for literature strong enough to wrestle with the real world. On the page it allows us to spot signs of humanity; off the page it can teach us to start a conversation with the strangest of strangers, to thrive alongside difference. It can even affect those life-or-death choices we make instinctively in a crisis. This kind of empathy has nothing to do with being nice, and it’s not for the faint of heart.

Even within the safety of the page, it’s tempting to dodge empathy’s challenge, instead demonizing villains and idealizing heroes, but that’s when the needle on art’s moral compass goes inert. Then we’re navigating blind: confident that we know what the bad people look like and that they’re not us — and therefore we’re at no risk of error.

Our best writers, in contrast, portray humans in their full complexity. This is what Gish Jen is doing in the short story “Who’s Irish?” and Rohinton Mistry in the novel “A Fine Balance.” Line by line, these writers illuminate the inner worlds of characters who cause harm — which is not the same as forgiving them. No one would ever say that Toni Morrison forgives the character Cholly Breedlove, who rapes his daughter in “The Bluest Eye.” What Ms. Morrison accomplishes instead is the boldest act of moral and emotional understanding I’ve ever seen on the page.

In the classroom exercise, the upsetting phrases my students scribble might be personal (“You’ll never be a writer,” “You’re ugly”) or religious or political. Once a student wrote a phrase condemning abortion as another student across the table wrote a phrase defending it. Sometimes there are stereotypes, slurs — whatever the students choose to grapple with. Of course, it’s disturbing to step into the shoes of someone whose words or deeds repel us. Writing these monologues, my graduate students, who know what “first person” means, will dodge and write in third, with the distanced “he said” instead of “I said.”

But if they can withstand the challenges of first person, sometimes something happens. They emerge shaken and eager to expand on what they’ve written. I look up from tidying my notes to discover students lingering after dismissal with that alert expression that says the exercise made them feel something they needed to feel.

Over the years, as my students’ statements became more political and as jargon (“deplorables,” “snowflakes”) supplanted the language of personal experience, I adapted the exercise. Worrying that I’d been too sanguine about possible pitfalls, I made it entirely silent, so no student would have to hear another’s troubling statement or fear being judged for their own. Any students who wanted to share their monologues with me could stay after class rather than read to the group. Later, I added another caveat: If your troubling statement is so offensive, you can’t imagine the person who says it as a full human being, choose something less troubling. Next, I narrowed the parameters: No politics. The pandemic’s virtual classes made risk taking harder; I moved the exercise deeper into the semester so students would feel more at ease.

After one session, a student stayed behind in the virtual meeting room. She’d failed to include empathy in her monologue about a character whose politics she abhorred. Her omission bothered her. I was impressed by her honesty. She’d constructed a caricature and recognized it. Most of us don’t.

For years, I’ve quietly completed the exercise alongside my students. Some days nothing sparks. When it goes well, though, the experience is disquieting. The hard part, it turns out, isn’t the empathy itself but what follows: the annihilating notion that people whose fears or joys or humor I appreciate may themselves be indifferent to all my cherished conceptions of the world.

Then the 10-minute timer sounds, and I haul myself back to the business of the classroom — shaken by the vastness of the world but more curious about the people in it. I put my trust in that curiosity. What better choice does any of us have? And in the sanctuary of my classroom I keep trying, handing along what literature handed me: the small, sturdy magic trick any of us can work, as long as we’re willing to risk it.

Rachel Kadish is the author of the novel “The Weight of Ink.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here’s our email: [email protected] .

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , X and Threads .

IMAGES

  1. Crash Course in Academic Writing for Essays and Research Papers

    crash course essay writing

  2. Crash Course Essay Writing by juan enriquez

    crash course essay writing

  3. Papers & Essays: Crash Course Study Skills #9

    crash course essay writing

  4. College Essay Crash Course, The Common App

    crash course essay writing

  5. Crash Course in College Essay Writing

    crash course essay writing

  6. Essay Writing Made Easy: A One Hour Crash Course

    crash course essay writing

VIDEO

  1. Pma 153 initial interview most important and repeated essay topics

  2. JKAS TOPPERS Strategy For Essay Writing

  3. Essay Structure

  4. Essay examples I The best online essay

  5. What is Extended Essay? (Conclusion)

  6. 149 PMA LC essay writing before initial interview

COMMENTS

  1. Papers & Essays: Crash Course Study Skills #9

    Writing research papers is an essential skill in your career as a student, and this week we're going to help you do that like a pro. From figuring out where ...

  2. Academic Essay Writing: The Crash Course

    Academic Essay Writing: The Crash CourseLearn how to think critically, write analytically and produce valuable essays.Rating: 4.4 out of 593 reviews2 total hours16 lecturesBeginnerCurrent price: $14.99Original price: $39.99. Nina Modak.

  3. Papers & Essays: Crash Course Study Skills #9

    Writing research papers is an essential skill in your career as a student, and this week we're going to help you do that like a pro. From figuring out where to begin, to finding the best systems, to breaking out of the "research recursion system" (maybe just figuring out what that means), we've got you covered. Resources:

  4. Crash Course Study Skills

    Crash Course Study Skills Preview. In 10 episodes, Thomas Frank teaches you study skills! Based on introductory college-level material and scientific studies, this course takes you through the tools and skills you need to get better at studying and finishing assignments in school and beyond.

  5. Crash Course in Essay Writing

    Basics in essay composition.

  6. Academic Writing Essentials: University Writing Crash Course

    ·Receive a detailed review of one larger writing project (i.e. a term paper, application essay, exam, etc.) Content and Overview. By working through the 45 lectures of this course alongside my personal commitment to your development as a writer, you will gain the skills and confidence you need to write well in any field and at any college level.

  7. Papers & Essays: Crash Course Study Skills #9

    Crash Course Study Skills is filmed in the Dr. Cheryl Kinney Crash Course Studio here in Misoula Montana and it's made with the help of all of these nice people. If you'd like to help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever, you can support the series at Pateron, a crowd-funding platform that allows you to support the content you love.

  8. Academic Writing Skills Crash Course

    This course offers you a step-by-step guide on how to produce top-quality writing. To do this, it unpacks the nature of academic writing and shows you how to: work with topics or prompts. brainstorm and mind map a topic. write an effective introduction. write great body paragraphs. write a memorable conclusion. paraphrase. reference your sources.

  9. A Crash Course on Essay Writing: How to write an essay in 7 steps

    Step 1: Decide What You Want to Say. Regardless of if you're writing a personal essay, a research essay, or a literary essay, you need to have an opinion or a point of view on the topic. So decide what idea matters to you enough to write about and then you can get started! This idea is your thesis (the concept that you want to argue in your ...

  10. Crash Course in Writing Effective Essays

    Crash Course in Writing Effective Essays. Herman Rapaport. Wake Forest University - Department of English . ... Of course, writing a paper without a beginning can be disorienting, so prepare to write the introductory page twice, once for you and another time for your audience. Keep in mind that a fairly usual revision ratio is about 5 to 10 ...

  11. The Writing Process: Study Hall Composition #1: ASU + Crash Course

    Writing projects can stress us out. Part of that is because we don't use a good system to organize our thoughts. In this episode of Study Hall we'll discuss ...

  12. Getting Started with Essay Writing

    Module 1 • 1 hour to complete. This is the second course in the Academic English: Writing specialization. In the last course, you reviewed sentence types and punctuation. You'll use that information in this course to make your writing great. In this course, you'll learn all about academic essay writing and, specifically, how to write three ...

  13. Essay and report writing skills

    Course reviews. Writing reports and assignments can be a daunting prospect. Learn how to interpret questions and how to plan, structure and write your assignment or report. This free course, Essay and report writing skills, is designed to help you develop the skills you need to write effectively for academic purposes.

  14. Best Essay Writing Courses & Certificates Online [2024]

    Writing in English at University: Lund University. Writing in the Sciences: Stanford University. English Composition I: Duke University. Writing a Personal Essay: Wesleyan University. Introduction to Research for Essay Writing: University of California, Irvine. English and Academic Preparation - Pre-Collegiate: Rice University.

  15. Writing an academic essay

    A crash course in essay writing - beginnings, middles and ends. Suitable for students on A level and access courses or undergraduates. This course will be delivered online. See the 'What is the course about?' section in course details for more information.

  16. Short Essay Crash Course: How to Perfect, Pitch, and Publish Them

    Whether you're an experienced memoirist placing excerpts of your manuscript or an aspiring essayist looking for an overview of the so-called "first-person industrial complex" of online writing, this class will provide a springboard to learn about the publishing landscape, practice pitching your work, and write timely personal essays.

  17. A Crash Course in Writing Well: Learn to Write with More ...

    A Crash Course in Writing Well: Learn to Write with More Style, Flair, and Impact ... business plans, website copy, marketing scripts, press releases, college essays, and nonfiction books with ...

  18. Personal Essay Writing Crash Course

    In this summer mini-course, students will get a crash course in how to create a personal essay. We'll take the essay process through brainstorming, drafting, revising, and polishing. Students will emerge from the class with a solid personal statement essay as well as several shorter writing pieces. For students who are rising seniors, they ...

  19. College Essay Writing Crash Course

    College Essay Writing Crash Course. Register Now. Join us on Wednesday, October 4 at 4:00 PM PT / 7:00 PM ET to discover the secret sauce to strong essay writing with Collegewise Founder and Chief Eating Officer, Kevin McMullin!

  20. Crash Course Essay Writing Teaching Resources

    This AP USH Crash Course handout focuses on the DBQ. It's main goal is to provide a review for students who may need a high level overview before test day. It is designed as a fillable pdf that takes students through reviewing the prompt, creating a thesis, forming a HAPPY analysis, sorting documents, and actually writing the essay.

  21. Crash Course: Essays From Where Writing and Life Collide

    Robin's most recent book is Crash Course: Essays From Where Writing And Life Collide. Robin's work can be found in such publications as One Story, The New York Times Book Review, The Chicago Tribune, Southern Review, The Rumpus, O. Magazine, Conde Nast Traveler UK, and numerous anthologies, including The Best Creative Nonfiction Vol.

  22. Crash Course: Essays From Where Writing and Life Collide

    In Crash Course: Essays From Where Writing and Life Collide, author Robin Black delivers unvarnished truth about what it's like to make one's way in the writing world. She'll let you know there is jealousy and paralyzing fear of failure and waiting for a beloved relative to die before you can write a single word. There's ADD and a messy house ...

  23. Opinion

    For more than two decades, I've taught versions of this fiction-writing exercise. I've used it in universities, middle schools and private workshops, with 7-year-olds and 70-year-olds.

  24. Crash Course: Essays From Where Writing and Life Collide

    Crash Course will be an oasis for writers at every stage, and for lifelong readers thirsting to explore the vortical intersection of life and art. Black is one of my favorite writers, and it is a joy to watch her craft the ultimate craft book. Black's essays are beautiful and hilarious and searingly honest articulations of 'questions both ...