data flow diagram in problem solving techniques

• BA Bootcamp
• Data Analysis Bootcamp
• Skill Training
• BA Mentoring Support
• Certifications

A Business Analyst's Guide to Data Flow Diagrams

Data flow diagrams (DFDs) are powerful tools that allow business analysts to visualize and analyze the data flow within a system. Whether you're a seasoned professional or just starting in the field, understanding DFDs is crucial for effective analysis and problem-solving. In this blog post, we will delve into the world of data flow diagrams, exploring their history, applications, notations, rules, and much more! So grab a cup of coffee, and let's dive right in to unravel the mysteries behind these fascinating diagrams.

What is a data flow diagram?

A data flow diagram (DFD) is a graphical representation of the data flow within a system. It provides a visual tool for understanding how information moves from one process to another, highlighting the inputs, outputs, and processes involved in the system.

At its core, a DFD consists of four main components: processes, data stores, external entities, and data flows. Processes represent activities or functions that transform input data into output data. Data stores are repositories where information is stored for later use. External entities are sources or destinations of data outside the system being analyzed. And finally, data flows depict the movement of information between these various components.

By using symbols and arrows to illustrate these elements and their relationships, DFDs offer a clear and concise way to map out complex systems. They enable business analysts to identify potential bottlenecks or inefficiencies in how data is processed and shared within an organization.

DFDs can be developed at different levels of detail depending on the scope and complexity of the system being analyzed. This allows analysts to zoom in on specific areas for closer examination or zoom out for an overall view of the entire system.

DFDs serve as valuable tools for business analysts by providing insights into how information flows through different parts of a system. They help facilitate communication between stakeholders by providing a common visual language that everyone can understand. So whether you're analyzing existing systems or designing new ones, incorporating DFDs into your toolkit will undoubtedly enhance your analytical capabilities!

History of the data flow diagram

Data flow diagrams (DFDs) have been around for several decades and have played a crucial role in the field of business analysis. The concept of data flow diagrams was first introduced by Larry Constantine, an American software engineer and management consultant, in the 1970s.

Initially, DFDs were mainly used in system development to represent how data flows through different processes within a system. However, over time, they gained popularity among business analysts as a powerful tool for understanding and documenting complex business processes.

In the early days, DFDs were hand-drawn on paper or whiteboards. Analysts would meticulously map out each process and its associated data flows using standard symbols and notations. This manual approach was quite labor-intensive and prone to errors.

With technological advancements, computer-based tools emerged that made it easier to create and modify DFDs digitally. These tools offered features like automatic layout generation, symbol libraries, and collaboration capabilities, significantly enhancing productivity.

Today, DFDs continue to be widely used by business analysts across various industries. They visually represent how information moves through an organization's systems or processes, helping analysts identify inefficiencies or bottlenecks that can be addressed for better operational efficiency.

The evolution of DFDs reflects the growing importance of visual models in analyzing complex systems. As technology continues to advance rapidly, we can expect further enhancements in tools and techniques for creating more sophisticated data flow diagrams that cater to the ever-changing needs of businesses.

Stay tuned for our next blog section, where we will delve into how business analysts can effectively utilize data flow diagrams!

How Can Business Analysts Use the Data Flow Diagram?

As a business analyst, you are responsible for understanding and documenting data flow within an organization. This is where data flow diagrams (DFDs) come into play. DFDs provide a visual representation of how data moves through different processes in a system.

By using DFDs, business analysts can effectively communicate complex systems to stakeholders clearly and concisely. These diagrams help identify a system's inputs, outputs, processes, and data storage points, allowing analysts to understand better how information is processed.

Business analysts can also use DFDs to identify potential bottlenecks or inefficiencies in existing systems. They can recommend improvements or modifications that optimize performance and enhance overall productivity by analyzing the data flow.

Furthermore, DFDs can serve as valuable documentation during system development or enhancement projects. They provide a blueprint for developers to follow when designing or modifying software systems based on specific requirements captured by business analysts.

In addition to these practical applications, DFDs allow business analysts to collaborate with stakeholders more effectively. By visually representing complex concepts in an easily understandable format, DFDs facilitate discussions and ensure everyone involved has a shared understanding of the system being analyzed.

Data flow diagrams are powerful tools that enable business analysts to analyze and communicate information flows within an organization. Their versatility makes them invaluable assets throughout various stages of project lifecycles – from requirement gathering to solution design and implementation planning.

Notations used in data flow diagrams

Notations are crucial to data flow diagrams (DFDs) as they help represent a system's different elements and relationships. These notations make it easier for business analysts to communicate complex processes and information flows effectively.

One commonly used notation in DFDs is the process symbol, represented by a rectangle. This symbol represents activities or tasks that transform input data into output data. Another important notation is the external entity symbol, depicted as a square or rectangle with rounded corners. It represents sources or destinations of data outside the system being analyzed.

Data stores are shown using an open-ended rectangle, indicating where data is stored within the system. Data flows are represented by arrows connecting various symbols, showing how information moves between processes, entities, and stores.

Annotations can also be included in DFDs to provide additional details about specific elements or relationships. These annotations help clarify any ambiguities and ensure that all stakeholders have a clear understanding of the diagram.

These notations serve as visual aids for understanding and documenting complex systems efficiently. By utilizing standardized symbols and annotations, business analysts can create comprehensive DFDs that accurately represent information flows within an organization's processes without confusion or misinterpretation.

Data flow diagram rules and tips

Data flow diagrams (DFDs) are valuable tools for visualizing how data flows within or between different systems. There are certain rules and tips to follow to ensure that DFDs accurately represent the information being conveyed.

It is important to remember that each process in a DFD should have at least one input and one output. This ensures that data is being transformed as it moves through the system. Additionally, processes should only produce outputs that are necessary for other processes or external entities.

Another rule to keep in mind is that data stores should not directly connect with each other. Instead, they should be connected through processes or external entities. This helps maintain clarity and prevents confusion when analyzing the flow of information.

When creating DFDs, it can be helpful to use consistent naming conventions for all elements, such as processes and data flows. Clear and concise labels make it easier for stakeholders to understand the diagram without unnecessary complexity.

Furthermore, maintaining balance in the diagram is crucial. A well-balanced DFD has an appropriate level of detail at each level and avoids overwhelming viewers with excessive complexity or too much abstraction.

Regular validation of the DFD against real-world scenarios is essential. Reviewing and testing the diagram's accuracy with actual users or subject matter experts can identify and address any discrepancies or missing elements early on.

By following these rules and tips when creating data flow diagrams, business analysts can effectively communicate complex systems visually clearly while ensuring an accurate representation of the information flows within an organization's processes.

Levels of Data flow diagrams

Data flow diagrams (DFDs) are graphical representations that illustrate the flow of information within a system. They provide a visual representation of how data moves from one process to another and the inputs and outputs at each stage. DFDs can be categorized into four levels: context diagram, level 0 diagram, level 1 diagram, and so on.

The first level is known as the context diagram. It provides an overview of the entire system by showing how it interacts with external entities such as users or other systems. This high-level view helps to understand the scope and boundaries of the system being analyzed.

The next level is the level 0 diagram, also called the main process or top-level DFD. It breaks down the system into its main processes or functions and shows how they interact. This level provides more detail than the context diagram but still keeps it relatively simple.

As we move down further, we reach lower levels, such as level 1 diagrams which provide more detailed breakdowns of specific processes shown in Level 0 DFD. These lower levels continue to break down processes into smaller subprocesses until all necessary details are captured.

Each subsequent level adds more detail and complexity while maintaining clarity in representing data movement within a system. By breaking down complex systems into manageable chunks, business analysts can easily identify areas for improvement or potential bottlenecks in information flow.

Understanding different levels of data flow diagrams is crucial for business analysts to analyze systems and improve their efficiency effectively. The various levels help to provide a comprehensive view of how data flows through different processes within a system, enabling analysts to identify areas for optimization and enhancement.

Advantages of data flow diagrams for Business Analysts

Data flow diagrams (DFDs) offer several advantages to business analysts in their analysis and documentation efforts. DFDs provide a visual representation of how information flows within an organization or system. This visual format enables better understanding and communication among stakeholders, making identifying bottlenecks, redundancies, or inconsistencies in the data flow easier.

DFDs help in identifying data transformations and processes involved in a system. By mapping out the inputs, outputs, and functions performed on the data at each stage of its journey through the system, business analysts can gain insights into potential areas for improvement or optimization.

Furthermore, DFDs promote clarity and consistency when documenting complex systems. They allow analysts to break down complicated processes into manageable components that are easier to comprehend and analyze. This simplification aids not only in understanding current systems but also in designing future enhancements or modifications.

Another advantage is that DFDs facilitate collaboration between different stakeholders involved in a project or process. By providing a common language and visual representation of the information flow across departments or teams, DFDs foster effective communication and alignment among all parties.

DFDs enable business analysts to evaluate the impact of proposed changes before implementation. Analysts can assess how alterations might affect other parts of the system by analyzing existing data flows and their relationships with various entities within the organization's ecosystem, potentially avoiding costly mistakes or disruptions.

In conclusion,

The use of data flow diagrams offers numerous benefits for business analysts working on analyzing systems' functionalities and requirements. From enhancing communication to facilitating process improvements – these visuals prove invaluable tools throughout various stages of software development lifecycle projects.

Limitations of Data flow diagrams for Business Analysts

While data flow diagrams (DFDs) are a valuable tool for business analysts, they have some limitations that should be considered. One limitation is that DFDs can become complex and difficult to understand when dealing with large systems or processes. As the level of detail increases, it becomes more challenging to represent all the interactions accurately.

Another limitation is that DFDs only depict the flow of information, not how it is processed or transformed within a system. This means that important details about data manipulation may be overlooked in the diagram, leading to potential gaps in understanding.

Additionally, DFDs are static representations and do not capture real-time aspects of a system. They provide a snapshot view of information flows at a given moment but cannot show dynamic changes over time. This lack of dynamic representation can limit their usefulness in scenarios where timing or sequencing is crucial.

Furthermore, DFDs may not always be suitable for highly technical or complex systems that involve intricate calculations or algorithms. These types of processes may require more specialized modeling techniques to represent their functionality accurately.

It's important to note that creating accurate DFDs relies on input from stakeholders who may have differing perspectives and interpretations. This subjectivity can introduce bias and inconsistencies in the diagrams if not properly managed.

Despite these limitations, data flow diagrams remain an effective tool for visualizing system information flows and identifying improvement areas. It's essential for business analysts to leverage other modeling techniques alongside DFDs when necessary to overcome these limitations and ensure comprehensive analysis.

Unified Modeling Language vs. data flow diagrams

Unified Modeling Language ( UML ) and data flow diagrams (DFD) are powerful tools used in software engineering. While they serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between them.

UML is a standardized modeling language that allows developers to represent a system's structure and behavior visually. It offers a wide range of diagram types, such as use case diagrams, class diagrams, and sequence diagrams. UML provides a comprehensive way to capture different aspects of a system's design and helps stakeholders understand the intricacies involved.

On the other hand, DFDs focus specifically on representing the flow of data within a system or process. They illustrate how information moves from one entity to another through processes, data stores, and external entities. DFDs provide clarity on what inputs are required for each process and what outputs they produce.

While UML is more versatile in terms of its diagram types, DFDs excel at capturing data flows in an intuitive manner. Business analysts often find DFDs valuable when analyzing existing systems or designing new ones because they can easily identify inefficiencies or bottlenecks in data movement.

However, it's important to note that UML and DFDs serve different purposes; therefore, choosing between them depends on the specific needs of your project. In some cases, both techniques may be used together to create a holistic view of the system being analyzed or designed.

In summary, UML provides a broader range of modeling options, while DFDs offer focused insights into data flows within systems. Each has its own merits depending on the context in which it is applied.

Steps to develop data flow diagrams

• Identify the system boundaries: The first step in developing a data flow diagram (DFD) is to define the boundaries of the system being analyzed clearly. This helps determine what should be included in the diagram and what should be excluded.
• Identify external entities: Once you have defined the system boundaries, identify any external entities that interact with the system. These could be people, other systems, or even physical objects.
• Determine major processes: Next, identify the major processes within the system. These are activities or tasks that transform inputs into outputs.
• Identify data flows: Now, it's time to determine how information moves through the system. Identify all relevant data flows between processes and external entities.
• Add data stores: Data stores represent where information is stored within the system. Include these in your DFD to accurately depict how data is stored and accessed.
• Define relationships between elements: Connect all elements on your DFD using arrows to show how information flows from one component to another.
• Validate and refine your diagram: Review your DFD for accuracy and consistency, ensuring that it accurately represents how information moves through the system. Remember, developing a DFD requires careful analysis and understanding of a system's business processes and technical aspects!

Common software used to develop data flow diagrams

When it comes to creating data flow diagrams, several software tools are available that can simplify the process and enhance productivity for business analysts. These software programs provide a user-friendly interface and powerful features specifically designed for developing data flow diagrams.

One popular software is Microsoft Visio, which offers a wide range of diagramming tools, including templates for creating data flow diagrams. With its intuitive drag-and-drop functionality, users can easily create and modify DFDs to represent complex systems.

Another commonly used tool is Lucidchart, an online platform that allows users to collaborate in real time while developing their DFDs. It provides various shapes and symbols specific to DFDs, making it easy to visualize the flow of information within a system.

Enterprise Architect by Sparx Systems is another robust software solution often utilized by business analysts. It supports data flow diagrams and other modeling techniques such as UML, BPMN, and ERD. This comprehensive tool enables analysts to create highly detailed and interactive DFDs.

A lesser-known yet powerful option is Draw.io (now integrated with Google Drive). It provides a simple interface with all the necessary elements required for constructing accurate DFDs efficiently. Its cloud-based nature allows seamless collaboration among team members.

Regardless of the chosen software, business analysts must select one that aligns with their specific needs and preferences. Each tool has its own unique features and capabilities that cater to different requirements or project complexities.

The availability of various software options makes it easier than ever before for business analysts to develop accurate and effective data flow diagrams. These tools streamline the process while providing flexibility in terms of collaboration and customization options. By leveraging these technologies effectively, business analysts can enhance their ability to analyze complex systems accurately and communicate them visually across stakeholders!

Worked out Example:

Let us learn the data flow diagram by means of an example. Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) management system is developed for the IT and ITES domain. The primary objective of the GRC management system is to help companies implement Governance, Quality, and Information Security Management Systems in an integrated manner. It has various features, including planning and tracking projects and programs using standards such as CMMI, ISO 9001, and ISO 27001, etc.

Through this example, let us try to understand how the data flows and gets transformed in the project schedule management module of Governance, Risk, and Compliance management.

An external entity is a person, organization, automated system, or device capable of producing or receiving data. It can be a source of information (source) or a sink (receiver of information). The user shown in the diagram is a source, as the user has to provide the search criteria. Another source is the PM. These are represented using rectangles.

Search for schedule, delete a schedule, add a new schedule, update a schedule, etc., are data processes. Here, the data is transformed into an output. For instance, the add new schedule process provides schedule details as its output. It is represented in the form of a circle or a rectangle with rounded corners. Processes should have at least one input and one output. 

Schedule and Risk DB are data stores. The schedule data store is a collection of data related to schedules where data may be read repeatedly and stored for further use. Each data store must have at least one data flow going to or coming from it. It is represented as two parallel lines or as an open-ended rectangle.

Thus, data flow diagrams portray the transformation of data. It depicts where the data comes from, the activities which process the data, whether the output results are stored or utilized by another activity, etc. DFDs are relatively simple to understand and are a great way to illustrate interfaces, connections to other systems, etc. However, it doesn't illustrate the sequence of activities and can become increasingly complex for large-scale systems.

Data flow diagrams (DFDs) are invaluable tools for business analysts in understanding and documenting how data moves within a system. By providing a visual representation of the processes, inputs, outputs, and data flows involved in a business process or system, DFDs allow analysts to identify inefficiencies, complexities, and potential areas for improvement.

Throughout history, DFDs have evolved from simple flowcharts to comprehensive modeling techniques. Business analysts can leverage these diagrams to communicate complex concepts with stakeholders effectively. The notations used in DFDs provide clarity and consistency in depicting different elements of the system.

While there are some limitations to using DFDs as standalone models due to their high-level nature, they offer several advantages that make them valuable assets for business analysis. These include improved understanding of system functionality by stakeholders, identification of bottlenecks and redundancies in processes, effective documentation for future reference or modifications, and ease of communication between technical and non-technical team members.

It's important to note that Unified Modeling Language (UML) is another widely used modeling technique that offers more detailed representations than traditional DFDs. However, many business analysts still prefer using DFDs due to their simplicity and ease of use.

To develop accurate data flow diagrams:

• Identify the scope and boundaries of the system.
• Determine the entities involved.
• Define the processes taking place within the system.
• Identify inputs and outputs associated with each process.
• Establish data stores where information is stored.
• Draw arrows representing data flows between processes.

Various software tools available today assist business analysts in creating professional-looking DFDs efficiently. Some popular options include Microsoft Visio®, Lucidchart®, Gliffy®, or even diagramming features offered by project management platforms like Jira®.

Data flow diagrams serve as essential tools for business analysts when it comes to analyzing systems' workflows effectively by providing a clear visual representation of data movement within a system.

Table of content

You may also like.

These Related Stories

Guide to SWOT Analysis Technique for Business Analysts

Guide to Backlog Management for Business Analysts

Decision analysis - What, Why, and How

Get email notifications, no comments yet.

Let us know what you think

Context and Level 1 Data Flow Diagram Examples With Explanation and Tutorial

The best way to explain things is with examples. We will show you context (also called simple or level 0) and level 1 data flow diagram examples to understand better the meaning behind it.

On this page:

• What is data flow diagram? Definition, advantages, and disadvantages – a tutorial for beginner.
• Rules and symbols for creating DFD.
• Context data flow diagram example (in PDF) with an explanation step by step.
• Level 1 data flow model diagram example (in PDF) with an explanation.
• How to draw DFD online? Best software tools and solutions.

Let’s define and explain it:

A data flow diagram (DFD) represents graphically a flow of data within a system. It illustrates how data is input and output from the system.

So, we can say a data flow diagram has 4 major elements:

• Processes – the main activities that are happening within the system boundary. The process can be as simple as collecting customer data and storing it in the company database. Also, it can be a very complicated process such as creating a report containing bank contracts with customers of all bank clones in a region.
• External entities – the sources of information coming to or leaving the system. External entities are outside systems such as people (customers, stakeholders, managers), organizations, computers and other systems that send or receive data from our system.
• Data stores – places where data is held such as files or repositories. Data stores show information that is not moving.
• Data flows – illustrate the movements that data have between the external entities, data stores, and the processes.

Symbols used in data flow diagrams

Each of the above elements has a symbol that represents it. Typically, data flow diagram uses the following symbols:

The above ones are so-called symbols of Yourdon and Coad.

There is also the symbol system of Gane and Sarson, but in our data flow diagram examples, we will use Yourdon and Coad symbols as they are easier for drawing and remembering.

DFD rules, guidelines, and tips:

Creating data flow diagrams requires some guidelines and rules that should be followed. These guidelines make DFD easily understandable and lucid.

Here are some of the key rules and tips.

1. Each process has at least one outgoing data flow and at least one ingoing data flow.

2. Each process can go to any other symbol (other processes, data store, and entities).

3. Each data store should have at least one incoming and at least one outgoing data flow.

4. Entities must be connected to a process by a data flow.

5. Data flows cannot cross with each other.

6. Data stores cannot be connected to external entities. Otherwise, it means you’re allowing an external entity access to your data files and stores.

7. The labels of processes can be verb phrases. Data stores are displayed by nouns.

8. Data flows cannot run between two external entities without going through a process (as you will see in the data flow diagram examples below).

Advantages and disadvantages of data flow diagrams:

Before going further to data flow diagram examples, let’s see what are some key benefits and cons of DFD.

Advantages:

• A graphical technique that is relatively easy to understand for stakeholders and other users.
• Provides a detailed view of the system components and boundaries.
• Provide clear and detailed information about the processes within a system.
• Shows the logic of the data flow.
• Presents a functional breakdown of the system.
• Used as a part of the system documentation.

Disadvantages:

• Takes a long time to create.
• Does not give any information about the timing, sequence, and synchronization of processes i.e. data flow diagrams do not specify when the processes are performed. Therefore it should not be confused with a process or flowchart diagram which can illustrate these things.
• Sometimes might be difficult for non-technical users to understand the diagram.

Data Flow Diagram Examples

1. Context data flow diagram: definition and example with explanation

When it comes to simple data flow diagram examples, context one has the top place.

Context data flow diagram (also called Level 0 diagram) uses only one process to represent the functions of the entire system.

It does not go into details as marking all the processes.

The purpose is to express the system scope at a high level as well as to prevent users from deep down into complex details.

The major advantage of context DFD is simplicity.

Key context DFD characteristics:

• Simple to draw.
• No need of technical knowledge to understand it.
• Shows the system boundaries.

Steps for creating a context DFD:

• Step1: Define the process.
• Step2: Create a list of all external entities (all people and systems).
• Step3: Create a list of the data flows.
• Step4: Draw the diagram.

Let’s illustrate the things with a context data flow diagram example.

Below is shown a simple context DFD drawn for a Clothes Ordering System and explanation.

Download the above diagram in PDF

Now, let’s explain how we create the diagram.

Srep1: Define the process.

As it is a context data flow diagram, the process is only one. In our case, it is Clothes Ordering System . Draw a rectangle for the process.

Step 2: Create the list of all external entities.

In our example, the external entities are:  C ustomer, Clothes Store, Clothes Supplier, and the Sales Manager .  These are all entities who are involved with our system. Also, now you can draw a rectangle for each of the entities.

Step 3:  Create a list of the data flows.

In between our process and the external entities, there are data flows that show a brief description of the type of information exchanged between the entities and the system.

In our example, the list of data flows includes: Customer Order, Receipt, Clothes Order, Receipt, Clothes Order, and Management Report.

Now, connect the rectangles with arrows signifying the data flows.

If data flows both ways between any two rectangles, create two individual arrows.

Step4: It is our diagram.

2. Level 1 data flow diagram: definition and example with explanation

As you saw above context DFD contains only one process and does not illustrate any data store.

This is the main difference with level 1 DFD.

Level 1 DFD breaks down the main process into subprocesses that can then be seen on a more deep level. Also, level 1 DFD contains data stores that are used by the main process.

• Step1: Define the processes (the main process and the subprocesses).
• Step3:  Create a list of the data stores.
• Step4: Create a list of the data flows.
• Step5: Draw the diagram.

Here is our level 1 data flow example – a decomposition of the Clothes Ordering System illustrated in the context DFD.

As you see, the above Clothes Order System Data Flow Diagram Example shows three processes, four external entities, and also two data stores.

Here are the steps for creating the level 1 DFD:

Step 1:  Define the processes.

The three processes are: Order Clothes, Generate Reports, and Order Inventory.

Step 2:  Create the list of all external entities.

The external entities are:  Customer, Clothes Store, Sales Manager, and Supplier

Step 3:  Create the list of the data stores.

These are: Order and Inventory

Step 4:  Create the list of the data flows

Data flows are:  Order, Bill, Order, Order, Inventory details, Inventory details, Orders, Reports, Inventory Order, Inventory Order, Inventory details.

Step5: Create the diagram.

How to Create Data Flow Diagrams?

It might seem a little bit difficult to create data flow diagram examples. But in our IT world, it can be very easy and even fun to make them using the appropriate software tools.

You can use paid or free graphing software , free mind mapping software  or diagramming solutions such as:

• VisualParadigm
• Realtime Board  – this is my favorite one.

The diagramming software tools like the above ones provide pre-ready templates that save your time and efforts.

They also make creating multi-level DFD (such as level 2 DFD) easier and at the same time deeper enough to represent clearly how the data is handled.

These tools also allow building very visually appealing DFDs with the use of a variety of shapes, colors, symbols, and arrows.

In addition to the context and level 1 data flow diagram, there are also level 2 and level 3 DFD.

Level 2+ DFD just breaks processes down into more subprocesses. Teoritucaly, DFD could go even beyond level 3, but they rarely do this on practice.

Hopefully, the above tutorial and context and level data flow diagram examples help you understand better the meaning and steps for creating DFDs.

Data flow diagrams are very useful types of graphs in the business that can support your data-driven decision-making , simply because the businesses are based on systems and processes.

From customer ordering methods to banking processes and operations, nearly everything an organization makes involves a system and processes of some sort.

About The Author

Silvia Valcheva

Silvia Valcheva is a digital marketer with over a decade of experience creating content for the tech industry. She has a strong passion for writing about emerging software and technologies such as big data, AI (Artificial Intelligence), IoT (Internet of Things), process automation, etc.

One Response

It was a nice experience and it provides detailed information that is easier to understand in all ways.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Problem-Solving Flowchart: A Visual Method to Find Perfect Solutions

Lucid Content

Reading time: about 7 min

“People ask me questions Lost in confusion Well, I tell them there's no problem Only solutions” —John Lennon, “Watching the Wheels”

Despite John Lennon’s lyrics, nobody is free from problems, and that’s especially true in business. Chances are that you encounter some kind of problem at work nearly every day, and maybe you’ve had to “put out a fire” before lunchtime once or twice in your career.

But perhaps what Lennon’s saying is that, no matter what comes our way, we can find solutions. How do you approach problems? Do you have a process in place to ensure that you and your co-workers come to the right solution?

In this article, we will give you some tips on how to find solutions visually through a problem-solving flowchart and other methods.

What is visual problem-solving?

If you are a literal thinker, you may think that visual problem-solving is something that your ophthalmologist does when your vision is blurry. For the rest of us, visual problem-solving involves executing the following steps in a visual way:

• Define the problem.
• Brainstorm solutions.
• Pick a solution.
• Implement solutions.
• Review the results.

How to make your problem-solving process more visual

Words pack a lot of power and are very important to how we communicate on a daily basis. Using words alone, you can brainstorm, organize data, identify problems, and come up with possible solutions. The way you write your ideas may make sense to you, but it may not be as easy for other team members to follow.

When you use flowcharts, diagrams, mind maps, and other visuals, the information is easier to digest. Your eyes dart around the page quickly gathering information, more fully engaging your brain to find patterns and make sense of the data.

Identify the problem with mind maps

So you know there is a problem that needs to be solved. Do you know what that problem is? Is there only one problem? Is the problem sum total of a bunch of smaller problems?

You need to ask these kinds of questions to be sure that you are working on the root of the issue. You don’t want to spend too much time and energy solving the wrong problem.

To help you identify the problem, use a mind map. Mind maps can help you visually brainstorm and collect ideas without a strict organization or structure. A mind map more closely aligns with the way a lot of our brains work—participants can bounce from one thought to the next defining the relationships as they go.

Mind mapping to solve a problem includes, but is not limited to, these relatively easy steps:

• In the center of the page, add your main idea or concept (in this case, the problem).
• Branch out from the center with possible root causes of the issue. Connect each cause to the central idea.
• Branch out from each of the subtopics with examples or additional details about the possible cause. As you add more information, make sure you are keeping the most important ideas closer to the main idea in the center.
• Use different colors, diagrams, and shapes to organize the different levels of thought.

Alternatively, you could use mind maps to brainstorm solutions once you discover the root cause. Search through Lucidchart’s mind maps template library or add the mind map shape library to quickly start your own mind map.

Create a problem-solving flowchart

A mind map is generally a good tool for non-linear thinkers. However, if you are a linear thinker—a person who thinks in terms of step-by-step progression making a flowchart may work better for your problem-solving strategy. A flowchart is a graphical representation of a workflow or process with various shapes connected by arrows representing each step.

Whether you are trying to solve a simple or complex problem, the steps you take to solve that problem with a flowchart are easy and straightforward. Using boxes and other shapes to represent steps, you connect the shapes with arrows that will take you down different paths until you find the logical solution at the end.

Flowcharts or decision trees are best used to solve problems or answer questions that are likely to come up multiple times. For example, Yoder Lumber , a family-owned hardwood manufacturer, built decision trees in Lucidchart to demonstrate what employees should do in the case of an injury.

To start your problem-solving flowchart, follow these steps:

• Draw a starting shape to state your problem.
• Draw a decision shape where you can ask questions that will give you yes-or-no answers.
• Based on the yes-or-no answers, draw arrows connecting the possible paths you can take to work through the steps and individual processes.
• Continue following paths and asking questions until you reach a logical solution to the stated problem.
• Try the solution. If it works, you’re done. If it doesn’t work, review the flowchart to analyze what may have gone wrong and rework the flowchart until you find the solution that works.

If your problem involves a process or workflow , you can also use flowcharts to visualize the current state of your process to find the bottleneck or problem that’s costing your company time and money.

Lucidchart has a large library of flowchart templates to help you analyze, design, and document problem-solving processes or any other type of procedure you can think of.

Draw a cause-and-effect diagram

A cause-and-effect diagram is used to analyze the relationship between an event or problem and the reason it happened. There is not always just one underlying cause of a problem, so this visual method can help you think through different potential causes and pinpoint the actual cause of a stated problem.

Cause-and-effect diagrams, created by Kaoru Ishikawa, are also known as Ishikawa diagrams, fishbone diagrams , or herringbone diagrams (because they resemble a fishbone when completed). By organizing causes and effects into smaller categories, these diagrams can be used to examine why things went wrong or might go wrong.

To perform a cause-and-effect analysis, follow these steps.

1. Start with a problem statement.

The problem statement is usually placed in a box or another shape at the far right of your page. Draw a horizontal line, called a “spine” or “backbone,” along the center of the page pointing to your problem statement.

2. Add the categories that represent possible causes.

For example, the category “Materials” may contain causes such as “poor quality,” “too expensive,” and “low inventory.” Draw angled lines (or “bones”) that branch out from the spine to these categories.

3. Add causes to each category.

Draw as many branches as you need to brainstorm the causes that belong in each category.

Like all visuals and diagrams, a cause-and-effect diagram can be as simple or as complex as you need it to be to help you analyze operations and other factors to identify causes related to undesired effects.

Collaborate with Lucidchart

You may have superior problem-solving skills, but that does not mean that you have to solve problems alone. The visual strategies above can help you engage the rest of your team. The more involved the team is in the creation of your visual problem-solving narrative, the more willing they will be to take ownership of the process and the more invested they will be in its outcome.

In Lucidchart, you can simply share the documents with the team members you want to be involved in the problem-solving process. It doesn’t matter where these people are located because Lucidchart documents can be accessed at any time from anywhere in the world.

Whatever method you decide to use to solve problems, work with Lucidchart to create the documents you need. Sign up for a free account today and start diagramming in minutes.

Lucidchart, a cloud-based intelligent diagramming application, is a core component of Lucid Software's Visual Collaboration Suite. This intuitive, cloud-based solution empowers teams to collaborate in real-time to build flowcharts, mockups, UML diagrams, customer journey maps, and more. Lucidchart propels teams forward to build the future faster. Lucid is proud to serve top businesses around the world, including customers such as Google, GE, and NBC Universal, and 99% of the Fortune 500. Lucid partners with industry leaders, including Google, Atlassian, and Microsoft. Since its founding, Lucid has received numerous awards for its products, business, and workplace culture. For more information, visit lucidchart.com.

Related articles

Sometimes you're faced with challenges that traditional problem solving can't fix. Creative problem solving encourages you to find new, creative ways of thinking that can help you overcome the issue at hand more quickly.

Dialogue mapping is a facilitation technique used to visualize critical thinking as a group. Learn how you and your team can start dialogue mapping today to solve problems and bridge gaps in knowledge and understanding (plus get a free template!).

Bring your bright ideas to life.

or continue with

What is a data flow diagram?

Table of Contents

Data flow diagrams: everything you need to know.

What is a data flow diagram? A data flow diagram (DFD) is a visualization that maps out the sequence of information, actors, and steps within a process or system. It uses a set of defined symbols that each represent the people and processes needed to correctly transmit data within a system.

Data flow diagrams are most often used to visually represent the flow of data within a business information system. These diagrams illustrate how data enters a system, how a system processes it, and finally, where it goes. This makes it different from a workflow diagram or flowchart , which is a broader type of visualization that can represent any other process or system within a company.

One way to identify the difference between a flowchart and a data flow diagram is to look at how the arrows are used. The arrows in a flowchart represent an order of events, while the arrows in a data flow diagram represent the flow of data and information.

A DFD can be as simple or as complex as the system it represents, but the easiest way to make one is with a Data Flow Diagram tool .

What are the rules of a data flow diagram?

There are a few rules to keep in mind when creating a data flow diagram that’ll help you make sure your visualization is clear, consistent-looking, and accurate.

Directionality: Make sure your data flows in one direction — from the input to the output.

Connectivity: Every flow of data should lead to either a process or a data store. This makes sure that your data has a clearly defined source and destination.

Naming conventions: When labeling processes, data stores, data flows, and external entities, keep your naming consistent and clear. This helps make your data flow diagram easy to understand for teammates and stakeholders.

Process hierarchy: When representing different processes within a system, establish a clear hierarchy to differentiate broader functions from more intricate ones. This helps simplify the system’s complexity while clearly depicting a logical flow.

Symbols for data flow diagrams

There’s a set of standardized symbols used to illustrate the components of a DFD. These symbols for a data flow diagram make it easier for your team to read and understand your visualization.

External entity

External entities are actors, sources, sinks, or terminators. They’re the components that exist outside the system, responsible for sending or receiving data. In other words, they’re the sources and destinations of the system’s inputs and outputs.

The process component represents the system’s functions, and it’s what transforms the incoming data into a usable output of data.

The data store component, as its name implies, is what stores the data in the system. Generally, these components are represented as files.

Data flow components are the pipelines through which the data is transferred in the system. In a data flow diagram, these components are generally represented as arrows and connectors.

Data flow diagram levels

Data flow diagrams are layered. Each layer of the diagram gets deeper and more intricate as it focuses on a particular piece of the system or data. The levels in a data flow diagram are usually represented from Level 0 to Level 2, and some exceptionally intricate systems may need the diagram to dive as deep as Level 3. The level of detail you want to examine will determine how deep the diagram needs to go.

Data flow diagram Level 0

Level 0 is usually the context level of a data flow diagram . It is unfocused and doesn’t generally zero in on a particular system part. Instead, at Level 0, a simple data flow diagram will provide a basic overview of the system, placing it into context and displaying a single, high-level process.

Data flow diagram Level 1

Level 1 of the diagram is where things become more detailed, and the map becomes far more focused. Level 1 highlights the main functions within the process or the system. Level 1 of a data flow diagram is where specific sections of the Level 0 overview start to get broken down and explained.

Data flow diagram Level 2

Level 2 simply goes another step deeper as it starts to map out and analyze specific sections of the Level 1 diagram. The deeper the levels go, the more text-based the diagram becomes. This is why many systems designers prefer not to go deeper than Level 2. However, for some complex and complicated systems, it may be necessary to go another level or two deeper.

How to create a data flow diagram

Now that you understand what a data flow diagram is and where these diagrams are implemented, it is time to design one for yourself. Below is a useful step-by-step guide for creating a comprehensive data flow diagram using Miro’s Data Flow Diagram Template .

1. Inputs and outputs

Start by sorting out your inputs and outputs. Each process you aim to map out should have at least one input and one output. This will ensure that your data flow diagram is complete and has no loose ends.

2. Start at Level 0

Start the diagram at Level 0 so that you can have an understanding of the system in context. This overview is useful and will let you know if you need to go into more detail in the deeper levels of the system.

3. Go into Level 1

Head into Level 1. This is where you will add meat to the bones of the structure. During the Level 1 depiction, you will want to start adding more processes and steps to your structure as you start to focus more on particular systems within the business. Remember to implement the standardized data flow diagram symbols and shapes mentioned above.

4. Add more levels as needed

Repeat the previous step and go deeper each time you want to hone in on a specific system or process. There is no cap on the number of levels you can add. But remember that you want the data flow diagram to be easily understandable. Share your diagram with your team members and invite them to leave feedback, ask questions, and make suggestions. Miro makes it easy to work with your team on a shared canvas and collaborate in real-time.

Examples of data flow diagrams

DFDs are helpful for mapping out all kinds of complex systems and processes. Let’s take a look at a few data flow diagram examples:

Online purchase system

Completing an online purchase may be as simple as clicking a ‘check out’ button and entering customer details. But there’s a lot more that goes on behind the scenes to get it done. A data flow diagram can help visualize the end-to-end process, starting from the moment a user decides to purchase something (the external input) to the moment they get their order confirmation (the external output).

In between, the DFD also visualizes how the customer data travels through the system — including where the system stores it. Not only would a DFD be helpful for understanding how online purchases occur, but also for identifying any bottlenecks or ways to improve the customer’s experience.

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system

Managing customer data is extremely important, and many businesses turn to Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platforms to keep detailed records. A data flow diagram can provide a clear overview of how a company manages customer data. Possible inputs include a customer signing up for a free trial of a product or a customer success employee emailing a client. Possible outputs include a completed customer profile or a customer receiving a sales or product email.

A DFD not only helps businesses maintain a clear view of how they interact with customers but also to identify ways to improve relationships.

Library management system

Anyone who’s spent time in a library can imagine how much information there is to manage, from book titles to borrower statuses. Thankfully, there are databases and other management systems to keep things under control — and a data flow diagram helps visualize how they work. Potential inputs include a librarian making changes to the inventory or a user signing up for a library membership. Possible outputs include user alerts about upcoming due dates or notifications about new library members.

Creating a DFD can help identify opportunities to optimize library management and ways to improve user experience for both librarians and members.

Types of data flow diagrams

Data flow diagrams are split into two categories based on the flow that needs to be visualized. A data flow diagram can either be a logical data flow diagram or a physical data flow diagram. Each type of diagram subset has its purpose and benefits.

Logical data flow diagram

Logical data flow diagrams focus more on the activities and processes of a business. They describe the “what” and present this metric in a graphical representation. Logical data flow diagrams depict what the business does, what it provides, and what it seeks to achieve. They describe the business events and the information or data required for these events to take place. Using a logical data flow diagram is beneficial, as it maps out the flow of business actions. It helps you understand the types of functionality that your business has or may be seeking to add.

Physical data flow diagram

A physical data flow diagram graphically depicts the implementation of business systems. It represents the “how” as opposed to the “what.” It tells you how the data moves through the system and how the system works. This type of data flow diagram includes things like the files, software, and hardware of a system. Physical and logical data flow diagrams provide different perspectives of the same data flow. They can be used in conjunction to create a holistic understanding of an entire process.

When to use a data flow diagram

Data flow diagrams were originally used to show data flow in a computer system. But today, they are used in different stages of ideation and design in various industries. They are particularly beneficial to companies that rely heavily on data and information. The following are examples of where data flow diagrams are put to use:

Software engineering

Software engineers use data flow diagrams to design software foundations and architecture before getting into the coding stage of software development. These diagrams also help as an ongoing system analysis tool to measure the progress of and implement improvements to a system.

Business management

Management must fully understand the processes that make their company successful. A data flow diagram is a useful tool for designing more agile processes and generally improving a company's processes. It can be used to streamline the everyday systems and workflow of a business.

Database development

In today’s digital era, almost every business has an online component that relies on a complex database structure to house users’ information. Data flow diagrams help to map out and plot the movement and storing of data within these online databases. In a world where cyber security and data protection are key, data flow diagrams create a clear pathway for developers and businesses to follow.

Benefits of data flow diagrams

A data flow diagram graphically depicts the functions and processes within a system, which in turn helps capture, store, and manipulate the information. This visual representation is a great communicative tool that can be sent back and forth between the user and the system developer. Here are some benefits of data flow diagrams in more detail:

Sets boundaries

Implementing a data flow diagram helps describe and demarcate the boundaries of a system. Without a data flow diagram, a company might struggle to understand where a system starts and ends. By setting specific boundaries, there is a clearly defined delineation in place.

Improves communication

A data flow diagram can help foster graphical communication between system designers and users. This can help engineers and developers understand the needs and wants of the user.

Effective visualization tool

Representing a complex data structure with a simple data flow diagram makes the diagram easier to interpret. Data flow diagrams help teams visualize the data and steps involved in software-system processes. Visualization is crucial in explaining processes clearly and making them more memorable.

Represents logic

Data flow diagrams support the logic behind the data flow within a system. Without this logical underpinning and understanding, the non-technical people involved in a project might not understand how the input data becomes the output data.

Data flow diagrams and UML

We’ve looked at different types of data flow diagrams earlier. Now let’s cover how these diagrams fit into the Unified Modeling Language (UML) world. UML diagrams and data flow diagrams appear similar, but there are some key differences. UML is a modeling language used in object-oriented software development. For example, software developers use UML to offer a more detailed overview of a process and explain how software engineering is done. There are 14 official types of UML diagrams. On the other hand, data flow diagrams show how data flows through a system. They can resemble UML diagrams, but they aren’t meant to represent details of software logic. When using UML, an activity diagram can be more useful than a data flow diagram. This is because a data flow diagram is a graphical representation of how data flows through a system. In this UML Activity Diagram Template , the sequence of activities is represented similarly to the way data flows through a system.

Who uses data flow diagrams?

Anyone working on system design is likely to benefit from creating a data flow diagram . Here are a few examples of teams who might use a DFD:

Growth teams

Growth teams need to use data and understand data flows to find new growth opportunities. DFDs help them better organize and understand what influences the data, how it’s tracked, and where it’s stored.

Data analysts

Unsurprisingly, data analysts are some of the most common professionals to benefit from a DFD. Data analysts are responsible for mining data and finding insights, so the structure and system requirements of data flows are critical to their work.

Product teams

Product teams are tasked with understanding how customers interact with a product, including how their data is inputted and where it goes. As a result, they often use DFDs to trace the flow of that data as well as identify opportunities to improve the customer’s experience.

Data Flow Diagrams vs Flowcharts. What's the difference?

What is a flowchart?

Different types of diagrams: An overview of visual tools

Data flow diagram examples

Get on board in seconds

Join thousands of teams using Miro to do their best work yet.

Home » DFD » Understanding Data Flow Diagrams (DFD): A Comprehensive Guide

Understanding Data Flow Diagrams (DFD): A Comprehensive Guide

• Posted on October 10, 2023
• / Under DFD

Introduction

Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) serve as a time-tested and traditional visual representation, offering a comprehensive insight into the intricate web of information flows within a system. This graphical tool is instrumental in illustrating how data navigates through the various facets of an information system, encompassing processes, data storage, and the generation of reports.

Hierarchy and Decomposition

One of the key strengths of DFDs lies in their ability to decompose a system into manageable subsystems. These subsystems can then be further broken down into lower-level components, creating a hierarchical structure. This hierarchical approach enables a systematic exploration of the system, with each layer dedicated to a specific process or data function. The foundational level, known as Level 0 or the context level, provides an overarching view of the entire system, while subsequent levels, such as Level 1 diagrams, delve into the specifics of individual processes.

Visualization and Documentation

Utilizing data flow diagrams facilitates a visual understanding of how data moves between different processes within a system. Information technology professionals and systems analysts leverage DFDs as a documentation tool to elucidate the intricacies of data flow to end-users. The process often begins with an overarching view, allowing analysts to gradually zoom into the finer details of each process.

Systematic Exploration

DFDs offer a systematic approach to exploring and understanding complex systems. Analysts can initiate the exploration at a higher level, capturing the essence of the entire system, before progressively zooming into the nuances of individual processes. This methodical progression ensures that the system is comprehensively documented while allowing for detailed elaboration where necessary.

Flexibility in Representation

Whether the system is manual, automated, or a combination of both, a well-constructed DFD can adapt to various scenarios. This flexibility makes DFDs a versatile tool suitable for a wide range of systems, accommodating different levels of complexity.

Preliminary Overview

DFDs are often employed as a preliminary step in system analysis. By providing an initial overview of the system without delving into excessive detail, DFDs lay the groundwork for subsequent elaboration. This strategic approach ensures that the essential components and interactions are captured efficiently before diving into the granular aspects of system requirements.

Data Flow Diagrams stand as an invaluable asset in the arsenal of information technology professionals and systems analysts. Their ability to visually represent complex data flows, facilitate systematic exploration, and adapt to various system architectures makes them a cornerstone in the process of understanding and documenting information systems. Whether used as a preliminary step or a detailed exploration tool, DFDs play a crucial role in unraveling the intricacies of modern-day systems.

Learn by Examples

Logical Data Flow Diagram Example: Grocery Store

Bank Account Data Flow Diagram

Physical Data Flow Diagram Example: Grocery Store

Data Flow Diagram: Purchase Management System

Data Flow Diagram: ECommerce System

Data Flow Diagram: Student Registration System

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Visual Paradigm Online
• Request Help
• Customer Service
• Community Circle
• Demo Videos
• Visual Paradigm
• YouTube Channel
• Academic Partnership

Linux Tutorial

Bash Scripting Tutorial

HTML Tutorial

CSS Tutorial

Website Development Challenges

Binary Tutorial

Regular Expressions Tutorial

Boolean Algebra Tutorial

Solve the Cube

PyGame Tutorial

Problem Solving Skills

Basic Graphic Design

Programming Challenges

Software Design and Development

micro:bit tutorial

Software Design and Development - Data Flow Diagrams

• Gantt Charts
• Input Process Output tables
• Context Diagrams
• Data Flow Diagrams
• Storyboards
• Metalangauges
• Good Programming Practice
• Debugging Techniques
• Algorithms Intro
• Algorithms Decisions
• Algorithms Pseudocode Summary

Data Flow Diagrams!

Go with the flow.

• Introduction

Data flow diagrams build upon the Context diagram . It allows you to start looking at your system and understanding it by breaking it down into it's main processes and describing how they relate to each other. In doing so, they are one of the first steps in a process called Top down design . This is where you break the problem down into successively smaller pieces until you have a series of smaller, simpler problems to solve (putting these pieces back to solve the original larger problem).

• Data Flow diagrams

A data flow diagram consists of a series of external entities (rectangles), processes (circles) and storage (rectangles with an open side) joined together with data flows (lines with arrows). Data flow diagrams are also commonly referred to as DFD's . Here is an example:

In this example we are illustrating how data moves between the main processes in a simple social media system. In the diagram the User sends credentials to a Login process which checks the details against data stored in User Accounts database. The Login process sends User details to the the two processes Make post and View posts . These two processes put data into the Posts database and retrieve it as well.

For more information on External entites and data flows, see the page on Context diagrams .

A process is an aspect of your system which takes in data from various sources and processes it to create new data.

Storage is anything which holds data for later use. It could be a database, a spreadsheet, document or some other file.

A data flow diagram is a model of a system. A model is a representation of the system (usually simplified in a targetted way), that is used to help you better understand the thing. A data flow diagram aims to be a model of what data is present in a system (or needs to be present) and how it is modified. It doesn't say anything about how the data is modified, when, where or why. It shouldn't say anything about how a solution will or may be implemented, only what it needs to achieve.

For instance, we haven't said anything about whether this system will be an app, or a website, or both. Will it be running on a Windows or Linux server? What language will it be created in etc. Those questions we will look at later but are of no real concern to us right now.

It can be very difficult to think about your problem from this limited perspective, and keep your model fully separated from any preconceived notions you may have about a solution, but doing so in a rigourous way is a powerful means to really understand your problem at a much deeper level.

This diagram above is missing a lot of details and is quite simplified. We have aimed to capture the main, essential elements of the system. There aren't really any rules regarding what to include or not include in these diagrams. Remember that these diagrams are created to aid you in creating a system (or solution). You have to work out what needs to be modelled in these diagrams to help you gain a better understanding, and what is superfluous and only going to distract you. Figuring this out is difficult but with practice you will get better at it.

For instance, our final solution probably needs an account creation mechanism, a forgotten password mechanism, we have left out details of whether a message can include images and video etc and this has allowed us to get a cleaner picture of the core of the functionality.

A good way to guage if your diagrams are too complex (detailed) or not is to show your diagrams to a non technical person who knows little (or nothing) about what you are modelling with the DFD. If they can look at it and effectively describe the system you are aiming to model then you are on the right track.

Multilevel Data Flow Diagrams

If the system you are aiming to model is simple enough, and you are intending to create a solution using an end user or rapid application type development approach, you probably don't need to go into great detail in your data flow diagram as a lot of the processing is going to be fixed and you are really just integrating existing, off the shelf products. A single level diagram like the one above will suffice. If you are building a more complex system, and / or writing the code yourself, then you will probably benefit from understanding and modelling the processes and data flows to a lower level. We don't want to do this by having many processes and data flows on our diagram however, that would make it unweildly and hard to read. What we do instead is have several levels of diagrams and break main processes down into sub processes.

Let's say, for instance, we are creating a system that will accept two dates (in either long form, 10th April 2024 or short form, 10/4/2024) and tell us how many days apart they are. We might model this with the following diagrams:

• Context Diagram
• DFD Level 1
• DFD Level 2 Validate dates
• DFD Level 2 Convert dates

You should always start off with a Context diagram .

Each process is numbered and the inputs and outputs from the User are the same as for the Context diagram.

The inputs and outputs of the parent process are included but don't attach to anything. Also note the numbering format used for the processes.

This diagram also matches the inputs and outputs of it's parent process.

To ensure maximum readability of our models, and taking into account chunking theory, you should aim to have between 3 and 7 processes on each individual data flow diagram.

It is important to number the processes, this allows us to easily match the diagrams between the different levels. Each lower level data flow diagram is effectively like opening the lid on an upper level process and looking inside. In this way, the upper level diagrams are broad overviews of the system and lower level diagrams provide more details on specific processes.

You don't have to go down to the same level on each process. You can go down as many levels as you need to adequatly represent the processing. Just keep ammending digits. eg. if we decided that the process validate days 1.2 needed further breaking down we could create a new diagram with processes labelled 1.2.1, 1.2.2 etc.

• Balancing diagrams

All of the Data flow diagrams we create (including the Context diagram) need to act as one coherent representation of our system / problem. For this to be the case, all of the diagrams must be balanced. That is, the inputs and outputs on one diagram must match up with the inputs and outputs represented on the parent process. This is illustrated in the diagrams above.

Once you have finished a diagram, take a moment to check this aspect of them. You may need to add a data flow to the parent diagram, or maybe a data flow on this diagram isn't actually needed. Often these inconsistencies lead to having to review your thinking about some aspect of the system and you end up with a better understanding as a result.

Creating your Data flow diagrams

Creating Data flow diagrams can be a daunting task. With a methodical approach the task can be made a lot smoother. Don't expect to create a perfectly accurate set of diagrams in your first attempt. It's not uncommon to discover that you need to go back and change things as your understanding of the problem / system increases.

Creating your diagrams in a digital form makes it easy to go back and ammend them as you inevitably will.

Step 1: Create a Context diagram of your system.

Step 2: Start creating a level 1 Data flow diagram. Start by including the external entities from your context diagram around the outside.

Step 3: Walk through the functioning of your system and note down each major step as a process.

Step 4: Take the data flows from the Context diagram and add them in to your Data flow diagram.

Step 5: Think about what data may need to be stored and add in data stores for these.

Step 6: Progressively work through each process, first looking at what it needs to output, then what data it needs to produce that output and where it is going to come from (another process, storage, external entity).

Step 7: Review your diagram. Does it adhere to the rules listed below? Is it missing anything or is there anything there which possibly doesn't need to be? Is the diagram balanced with it's parent?

Step 8: For each process that you think needs it, create a lower level data flow diagram repeating steps 3 - 7.

In producing accurate and correct data flow diagrams the following rules should be observed:

A process must have at least one input . A process without any inputs is a miracle. Essentially it is not possible to produce outputs without some inputs. A common question is "What about a process which just produces a random number? Surely such a process could produce outputs without requiring inputs?" Such processes are not really complex enough to be processes, they are really just functions (and are built in within most programming languages).

A process must have at least one output . A process without any outputs is a black hole. If a process does not produce any outputs then it effectively serves no purpose and has no need for existence.

A grey hole is a process whose inputs are insufficient to produce it's output. This is common and something you want to weed out and ammend if you want your model to be as robust as possible. What you want to ask yourself is "if I was given that data, and just that data, by hand could I produce all the required output?".

Processes change data and as such, the data leaving a process must be different to the data entering it. eg. if you have a process with a single input payment data and a single output which is also payment data , the process has not done anything to the data and as such has no real need for existence. A more valid scenario would see the input as payment data and the output as validated payment data for example.

Process names should start with a verb . As processes do things to data they should be named starting with a verb which describes what it is that they do. eg. Sort names, Validate form, Calculate averages.

Data flow names should be nouns, singular and as descriptive as possible . Adjectives and adverbs should be used to describe how processing has changed a data flow. eg. an order may flow from a Customer as a new order and flow through a process coming out as an unfilled order .

All data flows must either begin or end at a process (or both) . A process may not go between external entities or directly between an external entity and storage.

All data flows must be named . Otherwise we have no idea what actual data is flowing.

A process should only have inputs which are essential to producing the outputs . Getting the data flows down to the essential can be tricky but produces a cleaner and simpler model which will lead to a more robust solution.

External entities should be placed around the outside of a DFD . They are external to your system and it makes sense to replicate this fact in your model. You may include an external entity multiple times on your data flow diagram to help reduce the messiness of lines and make the diagram easier to read.

Data stores should be named as plural . They should describe the data entity being stored. Don't use terms such as database, or file, etc. Using these terms starts to indicate how a solution may be implemented and at this stage we should not be discussing that.

External entities should be listed as singular not plural . There may be a group of people (or things) which the external entity is representing but we are modelling an individual instance of them and so it is listed as singular. eg. we may have a system which interacts with many clients but in our diagram our external entity would just be labelled as 'Client'.

Data flows can be general rather than specific . eg. we should list a data flow as payment details rather than listing all the individual elements of the payment details. This is meant to be a broad, high level document and if we tried to list all the specific data the diagrams would most likely become way too cluttered to easily read. It would also take too much time and effort trying to get all the data accurate and complete which would distract us from the main purpose of the diagrams. We will deal with more specific data in later diagrams.

It is also ok to leave minor ancilliary data flows out of the diagram (for similar reasons as stated in the previous paragraph). I would recommend you consider this only when modelling a larger, more complex system however.

Use descriptive names for everything (external entities, data flows, processes, storage). It should be obvious what they are without needing further explanation.

Model data flows only, not actions . eg. your diagrams should not have data flows such as 'menu selection'. Determining what is data and what is an action can sometimes be tricky (when modelling a game in particular).

Try to layout your diagrams so as to minimise the number of data flows which cross over each other. Sometimes it is inevitable they will need to cross over but with a bit of forethought you should be able to place your external entities, processes and storage to minimise this. Doing so will make the diagrams easier to read.

The following are examples of Data flow diagrams that I have come across over the years which I have found interesting (generally because I have disagreed with some aspect of them). It is important to note, however, that these are just my opinions, other people may disagree with them).

There are a few things that are wrong here. The first is that the processes aren't really processes. They are pages within our intended solution. We will interact with pages in the solution (most likely) to cause the processing but the pages themselves aren't the actual processing. It would be better, for instance, to rename the Booking form process to be something like Record booking . By naming the processes as pages we are starting to dictate what our solution will look like and we start locking ourselves in. Another problem is that there may be more than one element of processing going on on a particular page, or processing which is not tied to a particular page

The Main page process isn't really a process either. It is not manipulating data to create new data. If you look at the outputs and input to the process, they are more actions than data. I would say this process doesn't need to be here. Yes, a main page may be required in the final solution but we are not modelling that aspect of the system here.

The data flow Free seats image is correct in that it is data and it is sent to the user but I would not include the word image here as again to do so is implying how the solution will be constructed. This locks us into a certain way of looking at how it will be done without considering that there may be better alternatives.

Finally, the Mouse movements data flow can be named more appropriately as well. It it's current form it is an action and again, is leading to preconceived ideas about what the solution may look like. Consider what data is conveyed by way of the action however. A selection of seats will be made via the action so a better label would be Seat selection .

In this example we have introduced a process for the Help page . This is still poor form but it seems like the only way to include the data flow for Help documentation . On first glance, the data flow for Help documentation seems reasonable. It is definitely data and the user does receive it. What process leads to it getting to the user though if it's not a page? When you get into a situation like this where you can't seem to find a process that fits in quite right, it is generally a clue that something is there that shouldn't be. In this case, although the documentation is data, it is static data, it is not processed in any way. You could argue, for instance, that the documentation may be stored as HTML and a process is required to render it before viewing by the user but this is not really processing the data, it is just superficially changing the look of the data. It is processing, but not of the nature that we wish to model in our Data flow diagrams.

In this example we are modelling a game which will be played on a games console. We have made a mistake by considering the Game controller and Television to be external entities. In a sense, they do provide and recieve data but from the point of view of what we are modelling they are not external entities but rather the conduits through which an external entity (the player) interacts with our system. It has also lead to the issue that the data sent from the game controller is technically accurate but does not describe what those button presses represent. (one might consider that these button presses are really actions moreso than data as well) As such we have a model which does not help us terribly much in terms of understanding the situation. Here is a better model of the system:

Another interesting thing to note here is that the processes aren't directly connected. They interact through the data stores. Sometimes we have systems like this where processes are independent but act upon common data. For instance, if this was a web based game, a player could be looking at the high scores table at any point in time, before, during or after another player actually playing the game.

We could also have decided to have the Play game process send it's score to the High scores process which could then decide whether the score was high enough to require storing in the High scores database or not. Or maybe we need to add another process which manages and decides this. All would be valid interpretations of the scenario and this just goes to illustrate that there is no single correct model for a system. Considering these alternative representations and discussing them is a great way to gain a deeper, more valuable understanding of the problem and this should ultimately lead to creating a better solution.

• The big picture

A good set of Data flow diagrams builds off your Context diagram and starts to break down your system / problem into it's major components, looking specifically at data requirements. These can then be further defined using IPO tables or structured into a more rigourous solution by way of a Structure chart which can then be elaborated on as a set of algorithms. Data flow diagrams are an effective step in breaking your unwieldly problem / solution down into manageable chunks which you can then start solving.

A data flow diagram is also a document you should discuss with your client / stakeholders to help ensure you are working on exactly what it is intended you should be working on (and not a misinterpretation of it).

• Section Breakdown
• Multilevel Data Flow diagrams
• Creating your data flow diagrams
• Next Section

Education is the kindling of a flame, not the filling of a vessel. - Socrates

Contact | Disclaimer

Regular Expressions

Problem Solving

Basic Design Tutorial

micro:bit Tutorial

Spreadsheets Tips and Hints

We use essential cookies to make Venngage work. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Manage Cookies

Cookies and similar technologies collect certain information about how you’re using our website. Some of them are essential, and without them you wouldn’t be able to use Venngage. But others are optional, and you get to choose whether we use them or not.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are always on, as they’re essential for making Venngage work, and making it safe. Without these cookies, services you’ve asked for can’t be provided.

Show cookie providers

• Google Login

Functionality Cookies

These cookies help us provide enhanced functionality and personalisation, and remember your settings. They may be set by us or by third party providers.

Performance Cookies

These cookies help us analyze how many people are using Venngage, where they come from and how they're using it. If you opt out of these cookies, we can’t get feedback to make Venngage better for you and all our users.

• Google Analytics

Targeting Cookies

These cookies are set by our advertising partners to track your activity and show you relevant Venngage ads on other sites as you browse the internet.

• Google Tag Manager
• Infographics
• Daily Infographics
• Graphic Design
• Graphs and Charts
• Data Visualization
• Human Resources
• Training and Development
• Beginner Guides

Blog Graphs and Charts

What Is a Data Flow Diagram and How To Make One?

By Cristian Oana , Apr 01, 2022

So many moving parts go into an organization’s day-to-day systems and operations—each as crucial to the success of a business or project as the next. Without the proper tools and techniques, it can be difficult to keep track of all the important details these complex schemes entail. This is where a data flow diagram or DFD comes in.

We’ve put together a crash course to help you master this powerful management tool so you can apply it to your own plans and strategies. From the different kinds of diagrams to their layouts, symbols, and functions—this short guide will take you through it all so you can quickly make your own in no time. 

You can create your own DFDs with  Venngage’s diagram maker , even without diagramming experience., Our customizable templates are made by experts for non-designers. 

Click to jump ahead:

What is a data flow diagram (dfd), what’s in a data flow diagram (dfd), what are the types of data flow diagrams (dfd), what are the uses of data flow diagrams (dfd), how to create data flow diagrams, 3 data flow diagram (dfd) examples, why is a data flow diagram essential in business processes, faqs on data flow diagrams.

A data flow diagram is a visualization tool used to illustrate the flow of processes in a company or a specific project within it. It highlights the movement of information as well as the sequence of steps or events required to complete a work task.

DFDs can vary in design and complexity, depending on the process it represents. It can be a simple outline of a general system or a more granular sketch of a multi-level procedure, such as the example below. 

By visually dissecting these otherwise abstract concepts, DFDs allow teams and managers to  better comprehend how a system works  as well as identify and troubleshoot potential problems to improve effectiveness.

Return to Table of Contents

A data flow diagram is typically organized hierarchically, showing the entire system at one level, followed by major subsystems at the next. Finally, details are shown for each primary subsystem, with components identified last. 

Here’s an example, which details the flow of customer data through the different layers of a business transaction. 

Each of the diagram’s elements is assigned a specific shape or symbol to stress its role in the process. More on those symbols later. 

Data flow diagram process

The data flow diagram process comprises four main components:

• External entities  – Outside bodies or systems that either feed or receive the information being passed within the diagrammed process. 
• Process  – A series of steps that make up a procedure that transforms inputs or information (e.g. through computations, logic, or changing its direction) as it flows through the system.
• Data storage  – A receptacle of information to be used or processed at a later time (i.e. a database). Data inputs or incoming data flow through a process and then through data storage. On the other hand, data outputs or outgoing data flow from data storage through a process.
• Data flow – The course taken by data inputs or information through a system until the output is produced.

Data flow diagram symbols and functions

A data flow diagram makes use of standardized symbols to represent the different components and functions that make a system or process. 

There are four common symbol conventions in data flow diagramming.

• Circles represent processes
• Squares or rectangles denote external entities
• Horizontal parallel lines symbolize data storage
• Arrows indicate data flow
• Lozenges (rounded rectangles) represent processes
• Open-ended rectangles symbolize data storage
• Squares or rectangles represent processes
• Ovals denote external entities
• Arrows indicate data flow 
• “Process”-labeled squares represent processes
• Human stick figures denote external entities
• “Entity”-labeled rectangles symbolize storage

You can select any of these conventions for your DFDs, just bear in mind to be clear and consistent with the shapes you use. Additionally, if you need to include more details about each process, you can make use of bubble charts to break these down. 

Data flow diagram layout

Now that you’re familiar with the key components and symbols used in data flow diagrams, it’s time to look at how to arrange these elements into one cohesive layout. 

As DFDs represent a chronological process, their parts are generally organized from top to bottom, left to right. Here’s a quick sketch to give you a better idea of the order of elements in a DFD:

External entity → Data inputs → Process → Data outputs → Data storage → External entity

This illustrates how an external entity feeds the data or information that goes through a process that transforms it into output. Unless used immediately, the output can go through data storage, where it is kept until needed. 

A real-life example of this would be a food establishment’s customer reservations system, such as the example below. 

The guest (external entity) enters their booking request into the system (data input) which then runs a process to find the guest a table on their preferred schedule (data output). 

The system can be programmed to retain the guest’s information in a database (data storage) for easy access next time the same guest books a table at the establishment. Meantime, the guest (external entity) receives the details of their current reservation (data output). 

Some processes can also be represented in values or percentages to show the amount of a product or service that can be delivered within a given period of time. For instance, in the example above, the reservations system can display the volume of guests expected on a given date so the host can make informed recommendations to the guest.

There are two types of data flow diagrams: logical data flow diagram (LFD) and physical data flow diagram (PFD).

Logical data flow diagram 

A logical DFD shows the conceptual flow of information through a process, focusing on the kind of data needed, its source, destination, and the transformation desired from the process. Here’s an example.

This type of DFD is often used in the early stages of system or process design when requirements are being determined. In the world of information systems design, this is where developers conduct a structured systems analysis. 

Physical data flow diagram 

On the other hand, a physical DFD visualizes how the system plan will be executed, including the specific tools, hardware, or players needed to make it work. Just like this example. 

In information systems design, physical DFDs show how a system works after its requirements has been finalized and moved into full production.

Data flow diagrams can be used to document and analyze processes and systems in both virtual and real-life settings. In software engineering, where DFDs first came to be known, they can provide thorough technical guidance prior to encoding digital programs or applications. 

Meanwhile, in business and project management, they can help managers and their teams master internal or external processes upon which the success of projects or the satisfaction of customers depend.

In both cases, DFDs can point out potential problems or bottlenecks by virtue of breaking down complex procedures and uncovering every last detail that goes into them. By doing so, DFDs ensure the effectiveness of a plan or strategy. 

Here are some examples used for specific purposes:

Application data flow diagrams

These DFDs show the flow of information through the frames of an application. It visualizes how a user moves through an application such as a POS system or an e-commerce portal based on the data they input and the process this data goes through until output is delivered. 

This diagram can be used when application requirements are determined during application design.

The sample DFD below details the process a shopper might take when shopping via a supermarket’s mobile app.

These DFDs illustrate how work is done on inputs to produce an output. To depict this transformation, the elements in a system DFD are connected to show what happens to data and where it goes when a specific action is performed upon it. 

For example, this system DFD for an automobile’s cruise control program shows how the program responds when a user decides (action) to go fast or slow. 

Database process flow diagrams

These DFDs map out the flow of information from data storage through a process towards an endpoint, like a user or a customer, just as in the example below. 

This type of diagram does not illustrate external controls or decisions. As such, it is typically used when application or system requirements have been ironed out, performance bottlenecks are determined and addressed, or system interfaces and logic are combined into one process.

User interface flow diagrams

User interface flow diagrams illustrate how users navigate a system or the actual process a user takes to complete a task. Take a look at this example. 

This type of DFD is particularly helpful during the early stages of system or application design, when the intended user experience is being mapped out and fine-tuned.

Now combine everything you know so far about data flow diagrams, their symbols, components, and layouts to make your own. Here are some steps to help simplify and guide you through the task: 

Step 1: Identify the outcomes of your system or process, or what you want your diagram to accomplish

Step zero is, of course, determining the system or process you want to analyze. Once you’ve identified that, you must deliberate and plan the outcomes you want to accomplish through this visualization exercise. 

Is it to find a possible cause for bottlenecks in your implementation? To refine your internal processes? Or simply to help your team members to better understand how things work?

Step 2: Classify the elements of your system or process according to the components of a DFD

Identify which elements of your chosen methodology are your external entities, data inputs and outputs, data storage, and process steps. 

One way to go about it is to locate the major inputs and outputs of your process, which will give you a good overview of your system and what you want to achieve. From there, you can easily fill the space between. 

Step 3: Create a context diagram

A context diagram is a level 0 DFD. It’s basically an outline of a high-level scheme. It’s designed to be straightforward, depicting a single process. 

Here is an example. 

To create one, connect your major inputs and outputs to your external entities. This illustrates the most general path data goes through from input to output. 

Step 4: Expand your context diagram into a level 1, 2, or 3 DFD 

You’ll need to break down your context diagram to reveal the details of your main systems. A level 1, 2, or 3 DFD will do just that—take the example below. 

To do this, simply add and connect elements to your subprocesses and -systems. Do it one tier or section at a time, making sure to add more data storage and flows when and where necessary. 

Step 5: Verify your DFD’s accuracy

Once you’ve mapped out every detail, you must make sure your final diagram is accurate and correct. Proofread it by walking through each level and each step, paying close attention to the movement of information. Validate that the data flow makes sense and that you have all the necessary components where you need them to be. 

Make sure your diagram can be easily understood by external parties, too. You can do this by running your DFD by a colleague or team member to check if they are able to comprehend the process and data transformation you wish to illustrate through it. 

Let’s take a look at some DFD examples and how they can be used across businesses. 

This diagram uses the Gane and Sarson symbol system to create a clear hierarchy and distinction among its components. The variety and organized use of figures make it easy for those reading or using this diagram to identify the data inputs, outputs, storage, and process. 

In the next example, elements are arranged from left to right, creating a clean visual that’s easy to read and understand. 

Colors can also enhance the look of your DFD. Assign specific shades to each component to drive home the significance of their roles in the process or system. 

Businesses require a whole universe of systems and processes to be effective. These, in turn, must be managed properly in order to achieve their intended outputs and objectives. 

Data flow diagrams can help business managers and teams competently carry out plans and accomplish tasks by providing a straightforward yet engaging visual guide on multi-level—and otherwise complicated—methodologies. They’re also easy on the eyes.

DFDs can also help teams identify potential obstacles that can cause a project or program to perform poorly or, worse, fail to meet expectations. By addressing these kinks in data flows, organizations can efficiently reduce costs and improve overall productivity.

Additionally, flow diagrams can help executives with external audits and assist organizations when it comes to obtaining and maintaining ISO certifications. 

What is included in a data flow diagram?

A data flow diagram comprises four essential components: external entities, process, data flow, and data storage. It makes use of standardized symbols (i.e. shapes and figures) to denote the role of each of these elements in a given system or process. 

What is the difference between a flowchart and a DFD?

A data flow diagram details the process by which data flows and transforms through a system. Meanwhile, a flowchart illustrates a sequence of steps that must be taken to accomplish a task or solve a problem.

Create a data flow diagram to build better business processes!

A data flow diagram is a powerful tool that companies can use to ensure the effective implementation of a system or process. 

By providing a visual representation of the methodologies involved in a business process, it can help managers and their teams develop a deeper, more comprehensive grasp of the strategies and techniques necessary to make a project succeed.

Don’t miss out on these benefits and create your own data flow diagrams today. Sign up for an account on Venngage (it’s free!) and gain access to a whole library of diagram templates you can easily customize with the site’s drag-and-drop editor. No design experience required. 

We also invite you to upgrade to a Venngage business account to access  My Brand Kit , which lets you add your company’s logo, color palette, and fonts to all your designs with a single click.

A business account also includes the  real-time collaboration feature , so you can invite members of your team to work simultaneously on a project.

Home » Diagram » Comprehensive Guide to Problem Flow Diagrams

Comprehensive Guide to Problem Flow Diagrams

• Posted on September 21, 2023
• / Under Diagram
• / With 0 Comments

Introduction

Problem flow diagrams, also known as logic diagrams, are a valuable tool for breaking down complex issues into smaller, interconnected factors that contribute to the main problem. These diagrams empower individuals directly impacted by a problem by helping them gain a deeper understanding of the various elements that constitute a larger issue. Additionally, problem flow diagrams assist decision-makers in identifying steps they can take to address the problem or its components effectively.

The primary purpose of a problem flow diagram is to:

• Simplify Complexity: Problem flow diagrams break down complex issues into manageable components, making it easier to analyze and address specific aspects of the problem.
• Facilitate Understanding: They provide a visual representation of the problem, allowing stakeholders to grasp the interconnections between various factors.
• Empower Stakeholders: These diagrams empower individuals involved in problem-solving by giving them a clear view of the problem’s components and potential solutions.
• Inform Decision-Making: Problem flow diagrams help decision-makers identify areas that require immediate attention and prioritize actions.

Key Concepts and Elements

To create an effective problem flow diagram, you need to understand its key concepts and elements:

1. Problem Statement

Begin by defining the main problem or issue you want to address. This statement serves as the central focus of the diagram.

2. Causal Factors

Identify the factors or components that contribute to the problem. These are the elements that, when altered, can help mitigate or resolve the issue.

3. Relationships

Determine the relationships between causal factors. Establish how these factors interact with and influence each other. Use arrows or lines to represent these connections.

4. Solutions and Actions

For each causal factor, propose potential solutions or actions that can be taken to address or mitigate the issue. These are the steps that stakeholders can implement.

5. Prioritization

Assign priorities to causal factors and solutions based on their importance and urgency. This helps stakeholders focus on the most critical aspects of the problem.

Learn by Examples using Visual Paradigm Online

Visual Paradigm Online is a powerful tool for creating problem flow diagrams. Here are some examples using pre-made templates :

Example 1: Environmental Pollution

• Problem Statement: “Addressing Environmental Pollution.”
• Air Pollution
• Water Pollution
• Land Pollution
• Relationships: Show how these factors influence each other. For instance, depict how air pollution contributes to water pollution.
• Solutions and Actions: Identify specific actions like reducing emissions, enforcing pollution control regulations, and promoting sustainable practices.
• Prioritization: Highlight the most critical factors and actions, such as immediate emission reductions and stricter regulatory enforcement.

Example 2: Community Health Improvement

• Problem Statement: “Improving Community Health.”
• Lack of Access to Healthcare
• Poor Nutrition
• Sedentary Lifestyle
• Relationships: Illustrate how these factors interact. For instance, show how lack of access to healthcare contributes to poor nutrition.
• Solutions and Actions: Suggest actions like building healthcare facilities, promoting healthy eating habits, and encouraging physical activity.
• Prioritization: Emphasize urgent actions, such as increasing healthcare access and launching public health campaigns.

Problem flow diagrams are indispensable tools for tackling complex problems. They provide clarity, empower stakeholders, and inform effective decision-making. By breaking down issues into manageable components, you can address both localized community problems and larger societal challenges with precision and purpose. Utilize tools like Visual Paradigm Online to create visually engaging problem flow diagrams that facilitate understanding and drive positive change.

• What’s New
• Infographics
• Terms of Service
• Privacy Policy
• Security Overview
• Report Abuse

BA Techniques

Challenge yourself by keeping up with practical business analysis techniques you can apply on the job.

Data Flow Diagram: A Practical Guide

DATA FLOW DIAGRAM - Includes Free Template

If you have a massive and complex project with many entities, data, data sources, data destinations and processes going on, a data flow diagram is one of the most effective ways of making sense of all that data. The diagram mostly concerns itself with the flow of data through the system.

The DFD focuses on “what” the system will accomplish and not the “how” of it. It does not provide any information on the timing of information flow in the process or the sequence of activities – It is popularly used in Structured Systems Analysis and Design.

There can be as many levels to a DFD as possible – it depends on the level of granularity you’re trying achieve.

Diagram Notations:

• Gane & Sarson
• Yourdon & Coad (Shown below)

PRACTICAL APPLICATION

• List all the external entities that provide inputs to the system or receive outputs from the system
• Identify and list inputs from and outputs to external entities

* These first 2 steps will give you the context diagram *

• Identify all data that passes through the system
• Identify the origin and destination of these data
• Identify the processing that these data go through (processes)
• Identify the means of data storage
• Identify data connections from one process to another
• Identify data connections from processes to the data store(s)

GENERAL RULES

• Don’t let it get too complex; 5 - 7 processes is a good guide
• Number the processes – though the numbering does not necessarily indicate sequence, it’s useful in identifying the processes when discussing with users
• Re-draw as many times as you need to so that it all comes out neat
• All data flows should be appropriately labelled
• Data stores should not be connected to an external entity – because it would mean that you’re giving an external entity direct access to your data files
• Data flows should not exist between 2 external entities without going through a process
• No two data flows should have the same name
• Data flow arrows should point in the direction of the flow
• A data store must be connected to a process
• There should be a minimum of one data flow in and out of a process
• An external entity must be connected to a process
• Watch out for black holes – a process that has inputs but no outputs
• Watch out for miracles – a process with no inputs but visible output
• Process labels should be verb phrases; data stores are represented by nouns

Context Diagram (Context-Level DFD)

Think of your software system or project as a central entity affected by external agents or external entities. The objective is to show all the entities outside your system that interact with it, either by receiving data from it or transmitting data to it. It reveals nothing on internal processes. An example of a context diagram is shown below for a Supply Chain Management System:

DFD-Level 0

This diagram contains everything in the context diagram but also includes the major processes as well as the data flows in and out of them. The objective is to achieve a higher level of granularity. The processes illustrated here can be decomposed into more primitive/lower level DFDs.

​Data Flow Diagram: Level 0

DFD-Level N

This is where you take each process, as necessary, and explode it into a greater level of detail, depending on your preferred level of granularity. For example, DFD-Level 1 could focus on decomposing one of the processes in the Level 0 diagram into its subprocesses. For example, If we take Process 4.0 - Procure Raw Materials, it can be decomposed further into 4.1 - Aggregate Raw Materials, 4.2 - Place Order, 4.3 - Record Shipment Details and so on. If necessary, we can decompose 4.3 further into subprocesses, thereby creating a DFD-Level 2; the resulting processes would be labelled: 4.3.1, 4.3.2, and so on. 

Also, see Lucidchart's detailed explanation of what a Data Flow Diagram is.

For more information on how to create a Data Flow Diagram - Download Ed Yourdon's book on DFD  which will take you through DFDs from the fundamental aspects to the detailed. Download the template I used here - It's in Visio XML format and can be imported directly using Microsoft Visio.  Systems Analysis & Design in a Changing World also contains an explicit illustration on how to create data flow diagrams. The chapter on DFD is available for free here .

User story maps are an interesting and collaborative way of eliciting user requirements. One of the reasons why I find it so powerful is because it provides a unique approach for aligning discussions relating to the user, their goals, the process that supports the accomplishment of their predefined goals; and the requirements that need to be addressed to solve business problems.

Data mining can be described as the process of improving decision-making by identifying useful patterns and insights from data.

A data dictionary holds data about the fields in a database, such as field definitions, meanings and allowable values that reflect how data is used within a domain or organization.

Are you a business analyst involved in the documentation of business rules and creation of complex decision tables?

A concept model provides a great way of documenting definitions and communicating precise meanings of terms to stakeholders.

Employing the user journey mapping technique involves adopting a user-centric approach to product design, revealing opportunities to delight customers and identifying pain points that can be addressed thereby creating a product with an improved user experience.

Within the context of agile software development, the product backlog is a platform where all the potential work (product backlog items) that need to be delivered are recorded, tracked and prioritized. Though owned by the Product Owner, anyone may suggest items to add to it.

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a proactive technique that can be applied to the early detection of failures or defects in products and services. It is a systematic risk assessment process used by analysts looking to reduce the chances of faults by detecting problems and their possible repercussions in time for remediation.

If you are in business, here is a brief overview of how cause and effect analysis helps you find viable business solutions. Guest post by Lucas Cappel.

A roles and permissions matrix, an audit requirement in some organizations, is used to ensure that business activities are covered by identifying the responsibilities and roles linked to them.

Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is a global standard for constructing process models, with more organizations using it and schools teaching it as a subject.

The terms “Quality Assurance (QA)" and “Quality Control (QC)” can be confusing or even misunderstood to mean the same thing. In this article, the goal is to clarify the real meaning of the two terms and explain their differences.

Network analysis is defined as the process of “breaking down a complex project’s data into its parts (activities, events, durations, etc.) and plotting them to show their interdependencies and interrelationships.”

The textual representation of a use case shows the interaction between the actors textually and at an appropriate level of detail. There are several set elements that every textual representation of a use case should contain:

Originally released in 2005 by BPM Group, the 8-Omega framework has been adapted and embraced by a large number of organizations around the world for the improvement of business processes.

Requirements scope statements are defined later in the project life cycle and are relatively fluid. As long as they still fall within the boundaries set by project scope statements, they can be updated and modified to reflect the changing needs of the project.

The SCRS approach encourages analysts to present practical and feasible business solutions that flow from the current strategy and are in tune with the business’ overarching vision and goals. Think of SCRS as an action plan for solving business problems.

Process performance metrics generate accurate data, bringing more efficiency and effectiveness to the decision-making process. The data generated by process performance metrics can be aggregated and displayed on a unified dashboard to provide a panoramic overview of the company’s performance.

When deciding between different designs, you want to base your decision on rational arguments instead of subjective preferences. One methodology for establishing a procedure to select the best option from multiple available options is Pugh Matrix, also known as the decision matrix.

Consequently, systems developed using the traditional approaches to software development are rigid and difficult to change. It’s often necessary to modify a large number of parts of the system just to implement a single, small change. The traditional approaches to software development are effective only in situations where requirements are specific and unlikely to change over time.

One increasingly popular method for breaking down a process into smaller and more easily understood parts, which this article will focus on is called ICOR, which stands for Inputs, Outputs, Controls, and Resources.

The essence of VPEC-T analysis is to provide a collection of mental filters and guides. Together, they provide a simplified communication method that prevents loss in translation from business needs to IT solutions.

A control chart can be used to monitor processes for problems and to determine whether a process has become stable enough. As an analysis tool, it can be used to detect when problems occur and propose possible causes and solutions via an extensive root cause analysis exercise.

Some processes, problems, and projects appear complicated, yet their complexity disappears as soon as one takes a closer look and breaks them down into simpler parts. This is the objective of functional decomposition - to clarify how the overall functionality emerges from the interaction between individual components in increasing detail.

The key importance of problem tracking is seldom evident when there are just two or three problems to overcome at the same time; it doesn’t take much to stay organized in such situations. It gets much more complicated, however, when the number of problems increases, especially in the early phases of software development projects.

In a perfect world, our plans would always go according to our expectations, and nobody would ever make a wrong decision. Sadly, we don’t live in a perfect world, and things don’t always go according to plan. Knowing that mistakes are inevitable, the question is how to improve our practice or reduce those mistakes the next time we get an opportunity.

There are some major tell-tale signs to look out for when improving processes. These trouble spots exist to varying extents in most poorly-performing business processes. The objective of any improvement effort is therefore to minimize these as much as possible to ensure that affected processes perform as efficiently as possible and deliver value to the business.

The most obvious benefit of gathering stakeholders with different backgrounds in a single room is the increased chance of spotting defects in requirements before development or implementation begins. Structured walkthrough sessions also raise awareness about the different development or maintenance methodologies.

State diagrams typically describe the states of an object, the transitions between the different states and the events that trigger those transitions. Thinking through objects in a system and their respective states can also help to identify missing requirements.

A problem statement defines the problem being faced by a business and also identifies what the solution would look like.

It can be seen as the starting point for coming up with a product vision. In defining the problem statement, be sure to include these elements:

This technique is also known as “Item tracking” or “Issue Tracking" and it covers the supervision of defects, assumptions, actions and issues until they are resolved. It provides an opportunity for stakeholders to rank the importance of issues affecting them.

Business Analyst Learnings

This business analyst blog contains practical insights into business analysis, software testing and business process management. I will be sharing business analyst tips, CBAP Certification tips, lessons learnt and insights into all the things I've learnt during my BA career.

USEFUL BA PRODUCTS

Requirements Discovery List How to Start Your BA Career BA Template Toolkit BA Email Toolkit

Subscribe to Blog by Email

Sign up with your email address to receive news and updates.

We respect your privacy.

• Requirements Elicitation
• Business Process Improvement
• Stakeholder Management
• CBAP Certification
• Critical Thinking in Business Analysis
• Missing requirements
• Soft Systems Methodology
• Free Business Analyst Training Online
• Software Testing
• Requirements Elicitation Technique
• Use Case Diagram
• How to design questionnaires
• Root Cause Analysis
• Role and Permissions Matrix
• State transition diagram
• Pareto analysis and decision-making
• Problem tracking technique
• Document Analysis

  Business Analyst Glossary  | Privacy Policy & Disclosures  | Advertisements  | Submitting A Post | BAL Services

Australian Business Number (ABN): 27 735 714 328

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer

Additional menu

Nine essential problem solving tools: The ultimate guide to finding a solution

October 26, 2023 by MindManager Blog

Problem solving may unfold differently depending on the industry, or even the department you work in. However, most agree that before you can fix any issue, you need to be clear on what it is, why it’s happening, and what your ideal long-term solution will achieve.

Understanding both the nature and the cause of a problem is the only way to figure out which actions will help you resolve it.

Given that most problem-solving processes are part inspiration and part perspiration, you’ll be more successful if you can reach for a problem solving tool that facilitates collaboration, encourages creative thinking, and makes it easier to implement the fix you devise.

The problem solving tools include three unique categories: problem solving diagrams, problem solving mind maps, and problem solving software solutions.

They include:

• Fishbone diagrams
• Strategy maps
• Mental maps
• Concept maps
• Layered process audit software
• Charting software
• MindManager

In this article, we’ve put together a roundup of versatile problem solving tools and software to help you and your team map out and repair workplace issues as efficiently as possible.

Let’s get started!

Problem solving diagrams

Mapping your way out of a problem is the simplest way to see where you are, and where you need to end up.

Not only do visual problem maps let you plot the most efficient route from Point A (dysfunctional situation) to Point B (flawless process), problem mapping diagrams make it easier to see:

• The root cause of a dilemma.
• The steps, resources, and personnel associated with each possible solution.
• The least time-consuming, most cost-effective options.

A visual problem solving process help to solidify understanding. Furthermore, it’s a great way for you and your team to transform abstract ideas into a practical, reconstructive plan.

Here are three examples of common problem mapping diagrams you can try with your team:

1. Fishbone diagrams

Fishbone diagrams are a common problem solving tool so-named because, once complete, they resemble the skeleton of a fish.

With the possible root causes of an issue (the ribs) branching off from either side of a spine line attached to the head (the problem), dynamic fishbone diagrams let you:

• Lay out a related set of possible reasons for an existing problem
• Investigate each possibility by breaking it out into sub-causes
• See how contributing factors relate to one another

Fishbone diagrams are also known as cause and effect or Ishikawa diagrams.

2. Flowcharts

A flowchart is an easy-to-understand diagram with a variety of applications. But you can use it to outline and examine how the steps of a flawed process connect.

Made up of a few simple symbols linked with arrows indicating workflow direction, flowcharts clearly illustrate what happens at each stage of a process – and how each event impacts other events and decisions.

3. Strategy maps

Frequently used as a strategic planning tool, strategy maps also work well as problem mapping diagrams. Based on a hierarchal system, thoughts and ideas can be arranged on a single page to flesh out a potential resolution.

Once you’ve got a few tactics you feel are worth exploring as possible ways to overcome a challenge, a strategy map will help you establish the best route to your problem-solving goal.

Problem solving mind maps

Problem solving mind maps are especially valuable in visualization. Because they facilitate the brainstorming process that plays a key role in both root cause analysis and the identification of potential solutions, they help make problems more solvable.

Mind maps are diagrams that represent your thinking. Since many people struggle taking or working with hand-written or typed notes, mind maps were designed to let you lay out and structure your thoughts visually so you can play with ideas, concepts, and solutions the same way your brain does.

By starting with a single notion that branches out into greater detail, problem solving mind maps make it easy to:

• Explain unfamiliar problems or processes in less time
• Share and elaborate on novel ideas
• Achieve better group comprehension that can lead to more effective solutions

Mind maps are a valuable problem solving tool because they’re geared toward bringing out the flexible thinking that creative solutions require. Here are three types of problem solving mind maps you can use to facilitate the brainstorming process.

4. Mental maps

A mental map helps you get your thoughts about what might be causing a workplace issue out of your head and onto a shared digital space.

Because mental maps mirror the way our brains take in and analyze new information, using them to describe your theories visually will help you and your team work through and test those thought models.

5. Idea maps

Idea maps let you take advantage of a wide assortment of colors and images to lay down and organize your scattered thought process. Idea maps are ideal brainstorming tools because they allow you to present and explore ideas about the best way to solve a problem collaboratively, and with a shared sense of enthusiasm for outside-the-box thinking.

6. Concept maps

Concept maps are one of the best ways to shape your thoughts around a potential solution because they let you create interlinked, visual representations of intricate concepts.

By laying out your suggested problem-solving process digitally – and using lines to form and define relationship connections – your group will be able to see how each piece of the solution puzzle connects with another.

Problem solving software solutions

Problem solving software is the best way to take advantage of multiple problem solving tools in one platform. While some software programs are geared toward specific industries or processes – like manufacturing or customer relationship management, for example – others, like MindManager , are purpose-built to work across multiple trades, departments, and teams.

Here are three problem-solving software examples.

7. Layered process audit software

Layered process audits (LPAs) help companies oversee production processes and keep an eye on the cost and quality of the goods they create. Dedicated LPA software makes problem solving easier for manufacturers because it helps them see where costly leaks are occurring and allows all levels of management to get involved in repairing those leaks.

8. Charting software

Charting software comes in all shapes and sizes to fit a variety of business sectors. Pareto charts, for example, combine bar charts with line graphs so companies can compare different problems or contributing factors to determine their frequency, cost, and significance. Charting software is often used in marketing, where a variety of bar charts and X-Y axis diagrams make it possible to display and examine competitor profiles, customer segmentation, and sales trends.

9. MindManager

No matter where you work, or what your problem-solving role looks like, MindManager is a problem solving software that will make your team more productive in figuring out why a process, plan, or project isn’t working the way it should.

Once you know why an obstruction, shortfall, or difficulty exists, you can use MindManager’s wide range of brainstorming and problem mapping diagrams to:

• Find the most promising way to correct the situation
• Activate your chosen solution, and
• Conduct regular checks to make sure your repair work is sustainable

MindManager is the ultimate problem solving software.

Not only is it versatile enough to use as your go-to system for puzzling out all types of workplace problems, MindManager’s built-in forecasting tools, timeline charts, and warning indicators let you plan, implement, and monitor your solutions.

By allowing your group to work together more effectively to break down problems, uncover solutions, and rebuild processes and workflows, MindManager’s versatile collection of problem solving tools will help make everyone on your team a more efficient problem solver.

Download a free trial today to get started!

Ready to take the next step?

MindManager helps boost collaboration and productivity among remote and hybrid teams to achieve better results, faster.

Why choose MindManager?

MindManager® helps individuals, teams, and enterprises bring greater clarity and structure to plans, projects, and processes. It provides visual productivity tools and mind mapping software to help take you and your organization to where you want to be.

Explore MindManager

Identifying Root Causes

• Group Decision Making Activities
• Choosing the Right Career: Problem-Solving Examples
• Brainstorming: A Comprehensive Look at Creative Problem Solving
• Analytical problem solving
• Identifying root causes
• Analyzing consequences
• Brainstorming solutions
• Heuristic problem solving
• Using analogies
• Applying existing solutions
• Trial and error
• Creative problem solving
• Mind mapping
• Brainstorming
• Lateral thinking
• Research skills
• Interpreting information
• Data collection and analysis
• Identifying patterns
• Critical thinking skills
• Recognizing bias
• Analyzing arguments logically
• Questioning assumptions
• Communication skills
• Negotiation and compromise
• Listening skills
• Explaining ideas clearly
• Planning techniques
• SWOT analysis
• Gantt charting
• Critical path analysis
• Decision making techniques
• Force field analysis
• Paired comparison analysis
• Cost-benefit analysis
• Root cause analysis
• Five whys technique
• Fault tree analysis
• Cause and effect diagrams
• Brainstorming techniques
• Brainwriting
• Brainwalking
• Round-robin brainstorming
• Creative thinking techniques
• Serendipity technique
• SCAMPER technique
• Innovation techniques
• Value innovation techniques
• Design thinking techniques
• Idea generation techniques
• Personal problems
• Deciding what career to pursue
• Managing finances effectively
• Solving relationship issues
• Business problems
• Increasing efficiency and productivity
• Improving customer service quality
• Reducing costs and increasing profits
• Environmental problems
• Preserving natural resources
• Reducing air pollution levels
• Finding sustainable energy sources
• Individual brainstorming techniques
• Thinking outside the box
• Word association and random word generation
• Mind mapping and listing ideas
• Group brainstorming techniques
• Synectics technique
• Online brainstorming techniques
• Online whiteboarding tools
• Virtual brainstorming sessions
• Collaborative mind mapping software
• Team activities
• Group decision making activities
• Debate activities and role-play scenarios
• Collaborative problem solving games
• Creative activities
• Creative writing exercises and storyboards
• Imagination activities and brainstorming sessions
• Visualization activities and drawing exercises
• Games and puzzles
• Crossword puzzles and Sudoku
• Logic puzzles and brain teasers
• Jigsaw puzzles and mazes
• Types of decisions
• Structured decisions
• Simple decisions
• Complex decisions
• Problem solving techniques
• Cause and Effect Diagrams: A Problem-Solving Technique

A comprehensive guide to understanding and utilizing cause and effect diagrams for problem solving and root cause analysis.

Cause and effect diagrams are a powerful problem-solving technique that can help you identify the root cause of any issue, from small everyday annoyances to complex organizational problems. By following a systematic process of gathering data, analyzing it and then developing solutions, cause and effect diagrams can be used to effectively tackle any problem that you may face. This article will provide an overview of the cause and effect diagram technique, outlining how it works and the steps involved in using it. We will also look at some examples of how it can be used to solve a variety of problems. When trying to solve a problem, it is important to break down all the possible causes.

A cause and effect diagram is a visual tool used to represent all the possible causes of a problem or event. It can be used to brainstorm different causes in order to identify the root cause of a problem. The process of creating a cause and effect diagram begins by identifying the problem or event, then listing all the possible causes that could be contributing to it. The causes can then be grouped together into categories.

For example, if the problem is a defect in a product, the categories might include “materials”, “suppliers”, “manufacturing process”, “transport”, etc. After the categories have been identified, arrows can be added to show the relationship between each cause and the effect. Once the cause and effect diagram is complete, it can be used to identify potential causes and solutions. By looking at the diagram as a whole, it is possible to identify which causes may have the most impact on the problem.

This can help narrow down potential solutions and make it easier to identify the root cause of a problem. There are several benefits of using cause and effect diagrams in problem-solving. First, they provide an organized way of looking at problems. By breaking down each component of the problem, it is easier to identify potential causes and solutions. Second, cause and effect diagrams can help individuals think more creatively about problems.

Benefits of Cause and Effect Diagrams

• they are useful for documenting problems and their solutions, which can be helpful when troubleshooting future issues., creating a cause and effect diagram.

Next, list all possible causes that could contribute to the problem or event. This includes both direct and indirect causes. Then, similar causes should be grouped into categories . This helps to narrow down the potential causes and makes the diagram easier to read.

After this, arrows should be added to show the relationship between each cause and the effect. Finally, the diagram should be reviewed as a whole to identify potential causes and solutions . Cause and effect diagrams can be an invaluable tool for problem solving and root cause analysis. By taking the time to create a diagram, individuals can better understand the various factors that may be contributing to a problem or event and identify potential solutions.

Cause and effect diagrams are an invaluable tool for problem solving and root cause analysis. By organizing problems into component parts, they allow individuals to think more creatively and identify potential causes and solutions more effectively. Furthermore, they provide a documented record of the problem and its solution for future reference. By following these steps, individuals can use cause and effect diagrams to effectively solve problems.

• Exploring Synectics Technique: A Comprehensive Guide

This article provides an overview of Synectics Technique, a creative problem-solving approach for groups. Learn about the benefits, key concepts and tools of this technique.

• Using Analogies to Solve Problems

Learn how analogies can help you solve problems more effectively, with advice and examples of different strategies

• Fault Tree Analysis: A Comprehensive Overview

This article provides an in-depth overview of fault tree analysis, a problem solving technique and root cause analysis tool.

• Virtual Brainstorming Sessions: A Comprehensive Overview

Learn about the different aspects of virtual brainstorming sessions, including tips for effective online collaboration and brainstorming techniques.

• Maximizing Efficiency and Productivity
• Questioning Assumptions: A Critical Thinking Skill
• Round-robin brainstorming: Exploring a Group Brainstorming Technique
• Collaborative Problem Solving Games: Exploring Creative Solutions for Teams
• Gantt Charting: A Primer for Problem Solving & Planning Techniques
• Crossword Puzzles and Sudoku: A Problem-Solving Exploration
• Mind Mapping: A Creative Problem Solving Tool
• Exploring Trial and Error Problem Solving Strategies

Exploring Lateral Thinking: A Comprehensive Guide to Problem Solving Strategies

• Negotiation and Compromise

Logic Puzzles and Brain Teasers: A Comprehensive Overview

• Jigsaw Puzzles and Mazes: Problem Solving Activities for Fun and Learning
• Making Complex Decisions: A Comprehensive Overview
• Recognizing Bias: A Problem Solving and Critical Thinking Skills Guide
• Exploring the Serendipity Technique of Creative Problem Solving
• Round-robin Brainstorming: A Creative Problem Solving Tool
• Solving Relationship Issues
• Cost-benefit Analysis: A Guide to Making Informed Decisions
• Imagination Activities and Brainstorming Sessions
• Collaborative Mind Mapping Software
• Debate Activities and Role-Play Scenarios
• How to Explain Ideas Clearly
• Managing Your Finances Effectively
• Identifying Patterns: A Practical Guide
• Listening Skills: A Comprehensive Overview
• Brainstorming Solutions: A Problem-Solving Guide
• Visualization Activities and Drawing Exercises
• Simple Decisions - An Overview
• Mind Mapping and Listing Ideas
• Value Innovation Techniques
• Design Thinking Techniques: A Comprehensive Overview
• Improving Customer Service Quality
• Reducing Costs and Increasing Profits: A Problem Solving Example
• Exploring Brainwalking: A Creative Problem-Solving Technique
• Finding Sustainable Energy Sources
• Creative Writing Exercises and Storyboards
• Brainwriting: A Creative Problem-Solving Technique
• Thinking Outside the Box: An Overview of Individual Brainstorming Techniques
• Exploring Online Whiteboarding Tools for Brainstorming
• Applying Existing Solutions for Problem Solving Strategies
• Analyzing Consequences: A Problem Solving Strategy
• Idea Generation Techniques: A Comprehensive Overview
• Critical Path Analysis: A Comprehensive Guide
• Data Collection and Analysis - Problem Solving Skills and Research Skills
• SWOT Analysis: A Comprehensive Overview
• Brainwriting: A Group Brainstorming Technique
• Word Association and Random Word Generation
• Reducing Air Pollution Levels
• Five Whys Technique: A Comprehensive Analysis
• Preserving Natural Resources
• Force Field Analysis for Problem Solving and Decision Making
• Analyzing Arguments Logically
• Exploring the SCAMPER Technique for Creative Problem Solving
• Interpreting Information: A Problem-Solving and Research Skills Primer
• Paired Comparison Analysis: A Comprehensive Overview
• Mind Mapping - Creative Problem Solving and Creative Thinking Techniques
• Structured Decisions: An Overview of the Decision Making Process

New Articles

Which cookies do you want to accept?

Featured Technique: Problem Flow Diagrams

The context

As we move into the New Year, and an era of increasing public engagement efforts by organizations and governments, a tool that was created originally for biodiversity conservation project planning, to break down complex problems, becomes more and more applicable.

Problem flow diagrams, or simply logic diagrams, help unpack a large issue or ‘wicked problem’ into smaller, causal factors that contribute to the main focal issue. Problem flow diagrams empower those impacted directly by a problem, by helping them better understand the interlocking factors that make up a larger problem, as well as identify ways in which they, as well as the decision maker, can take steps towards solving the problem or aspects of it.

Problem flow diagrams work well to simplify a complex problem into manageable components where opportunities for positive change can be identified more easily.

When to use this technique

Problem flow diagrams are best undertaken early on in the engagement planning process. They are particularly useful when a decision maker knows there is a problem that needs to be addressed and/or a decision that needs to be made, but they aren’t exactly sure what it is, or would like to empower their stakeholders to determine what aspects of the problem have priority.

Problem flow diagrams are a technique applicable to a wide range of engagements – from larger societal challenges to localized community issues.

How does this technique work?

In a face-to-face setting, it works best to have between six and 15 people work on one focal issue. If you have a larger group, you can break into smaller groups and have all groups workshop the same focal issue, and then compare the results for similarities and differences afterwards; alternatively, in a separate, previous exercise, you can identify multiple priority focal issues and assign different ones to each sub-group.

Step 1: Write the focal issue in the form of a problem, on a blue recipe card.

Example : High rate of cycling accidents

Step 2: Have the group brainstorm together all of the factors that contribute to the larger focal issue. These contributing factors should be written on yellow recipe cards, and they do not need to be organized in any particular order at this time. Continue until all of the key contributing factors have been listed.

Examples : Few bike paths; no regulation; low government funding; speeding drivers, etc.

Step 3 : On a large sheet of roll paper (or many flip chart sheets taped together), tape the focal issue on the far right side. Have the group discuss and arrange each of the contributing factors to the left of the focal issue, placing them as they impact each other – creating causal chains that lead to and explain the larger focal issue. (Tip: Don’t tape anything down until the final order has been determined.)

Step 4 : Have the group draw lines or arrows along the causal chains towards the focal issue; sometimes, these chains divide and/or converge.

Step 5: For the factors directly beside the focal issue – what the group has determined are the direct factors – re-write and replace the blue recipe cards with pink cards. This is to identify clearly the direct factors.

Step 6: Now that the problem flow diagram is laid out in full, based on group consensus, have the group identify three to four opportunities or priorities for improvement. Write these on white recipe cards. If you have multiple groups, this step also can work well when you rotate the groups and have them identify opportunities on another group’s problem flow diagram. (Tip: Contributing factors that have multiple arrows entering or leaving them are often good places to identify opportunities.)

Example: Prioritize bike-lane financing

Step 7 : If you’ve been working in sub-groups, return to the whole group and have each group present their problem flow diagram and discuss the opportunities. These opportunities can become, or help inform, your problem or decision statement.

An example problem flow diagram

What is required to pull this off?

• A representative group of stakeholders
• An established focal issue(s) or a preceding technique that identifies the focal issue(s)
• Blue, yellow, pink and white recipe cards
• Flip chart paper or a large roll of paper
• Large tables

A problem flow diagram is an exciting technique that works well for the ever-increasing need to engage your stakeholders. It works particularly well in situations where a decision maker has a mandate to engage, but isn’t quite sure on what to engage. It can be scaled up to address large societal problems, or be scaled down to address community or neighbourhood issues. This technique can even be used to start breaking down tough, complex issues with your corporate team or family.

For further information and guidance, the original technique toolkit is available at The Open Standard’s website here .

You might also like

Latest News

IAP2 Training Schedule

• Upcoming iap2 Courses

• How to Use Ishikawa Diagrams to Solve Business Problems
• Learn Lean Sigma
• Root Cause Analysis

Do you want to solve business problems in an efficient manner? If this is the case, you should think about using Ishikawa Diagrams. Ishikawa Diagrams, also known as fishbone diagrams or cause-and-effect diagrams, are a visual tool that can help identify the root causes of a problem. As a result, they are an ideal solution for businesses looking to improve their processes and reduce errors.

We’ll look at how Ishikawa Diagrams can be used to solve business problems in this post. We’ll look at the anatomy of an Ishikawa Diagram and show you how to make one step by step. We’ll also look at real-world examples of business problems solved with Ishikawa Diagrams and the benefits gained by doing so. Finally, we’ll go over best practises for using Ishikawa Diagrams and how to avoid common pitfalls.

Whether you’re new to Ishikawa Diagrams or want to improve your problem-solving skills, this post will walk you through how to use this powerful tool to solve business problems.

Table of Contents

What is an ishikawa diagram.

Because of its appearance, the Ishikawa Diagram is also known as the fishbone diagram after its creator, Kaoru Ishikawa. The diagram is organised with a central spine and several branches that resemble fish bones. Each branch represents a possible cause category that contributes to the problem under consideration.

Because it is a versatile and widely used tool in problem solving and process improvement, an Ishikawa diagram is known by many different names. Here are some brief explanations for the various names:

Fishbone diagram: This name comes from the visual appearance of the diagram, which looks like a fish skeleton with the problem or effect at the head and the causes branching out like the bones of the fish.

Cause-and-effect diagram: This name reflects the diagram’s purpose, which is to aid in the identification of the root causes of a problem by mapping out the various factors that contribute to it. The diagram depicts the relationships between the causes and the effects, making it easier to determine where to focus improvement efforts.

Herringbone diagram: This is another name for the diagram’s appearance. The diagram’s branches resemble the bones of a herring, a type of fish.

While the names may be used interchangeably, they all refer to the same basic problem-solving and process-improvement tool.

An Ishikawa Diagram has six main branches, which are as follows:

• Personnel – This branch includes all human-related factors that may have an impact on the problem under consideration, such as training, communication, and teamwork.
• Process – This branch includes all of the steps and procedures involved in the process or activity, as well as the equipment, materials, and workflow.
• Machines – This branch includes all the physical equipment and machinery used in the process, including tools, machines, and technology.
• Materials – The raw materials and other inputs used in the process, such as supplies, ingredients, and components, are the focus of this branch.
• Environment – This branch includes all environmental factors that may affect the process, such as temperature, humidity, lighting, and noise.
• Measurement – This branch includes all metrics and measurements used to evaluate the process, such as quality standards, performance indicators, and statistical analysis.

Each of these branches is used to identify potential causes that may be contributing to the problem under investigation. For example, if a decrease in product quality is the issue, the Ishikawa Diagram can be used to identify the various factors that could be causing this problem, such as a lack of employee training, faulty equipment, or low-quality materials. The branches are used to identify as many potential causes as possible, which can then be further evaluated to determine the underlying cause of the problem.

The Ishikawa Diagram assists teams in gaining a better understanding of the problem being analysed and developing targeted solutions to address the root cause by identifying potential causes and organising them in a clear and concise manner.

How to Create an Ishikawa Diagram

Creating an Ishikawa Diagram is a simple process that begins with identifying the problem and breaking it down into its component parts. Here’s a step-by-step tutorial for making an Ishikawa Diagram:

• Step 1: Identify the problem and write it in a box at the top of the diagram.
• Step 2: To represent the main spine of the fishbone diagram, draw a horizontal arrow pointing to the problem box.
• Step 3: Draw a diagonal arrow for each of the diagram’s six main branches (People, Process, Equipment, Materials, Environment, and Measurement). Label each arrow with the name of the corresponding branch.
• Step 4: Determine the possible causes of the problem and document them on the appropriate branch. Create as many causes as you can and add them to the diagram.
• Step 5: If necessary, divide each cause into smaller sub-causes. Include these sub-causes in your diagram as well.
• Step 6: Determine the root cause of the problem by evaluating potential causes and sub-causes. The root cause is the underlying issue that is causing the problem being investigated.
• Step 7: Create and implement solutions to the root cause.

In addition to drawing an Ishikawa Diagram by hand, several software tools are available to help you create and collaborate on these diagrams. Among the most popular software tools are:

SmartDraw : This programme provides a variety of templates and tools for creating professional-looking Ishikawa Diagrams.

Lucidchart : This cloud-based software enables teams to work together in real-time to create Ishikawa Diagrams.

Creately : For creating Ishikawa Diagrams, this tool provides a variety of templates and customization options.

Creating Ishikawa Diagrams with software tools can save time and streamline the process of collaborating with team members. These tools also make it simple to share and export the diagram in a variety of formats, making it easier to include in presentations and reports.

Using Ishikawa Diagrams in Problem-Solving

Ishikawa Diagrams are a powerful problem-solving tool that can be used in root cause analysis. Teams can analyse the causes and develop solutions to address the root cause by identifying the various factors that contribute to a problem.

The process of determining the underlying cause of a problem rather than just addressing its symptoms is known as root cause analysis. This approach assists teams in developing more effective and long-term problem solutions.

To use an Ishikawa Diagram in root cause analysis, teams must first identify the problem and draw a fishbone diagram. The diagram’s six main branches (Personnel, Process, Machine, Materials, Environment, and Measurement) are used to identify potential problem causes. Teams can analyse the root cause by brainstorming and organizing these causes on the diagram.

Teams can use the “five whys” technique in addition to an Ishikawa Diagram to identify the root cause of a problem. The five whys technique is a method of drilling down into the root cause of a problem by asking “why” five times. The goal is for the team to keep asking “why” until they find the underlying root cause of the problem.

For example, if the issue is a product delivery delay, the five whys technique could be used as follows:

• Why was the product delivery delayed? – Because the shipment was sent to the wrong address.
• Why was it sent to the wrong address? – Because the shipping label was incorrect.
• Why was the label incorrect? – Because the person who prepared it didn’t check the address.
• Why didn’t they check the address? – Because they were in a rush to finish the task.
• Why were they in a rush? – Because they were given too many tasks to complete in a short amount of time.

In this example, the root cause of the product delivery delay is that the worker was assigned too many tasks to complete in a short period of time. By identifying the root cause, the team can develop solutions to the problem, such as allocating more time for tasks or more effectively delegating responsibilities.

To Summarize here is an overview of how Ishikawa Diagrams are used in root cause analysis follows:

Step 1: Brainstorm potential causes for each branch and write them on the diagram’s appropriate branch.

Step 2: Examine each possible cause to see if it is the root cause or a symptom of the problem.

Step 3: Use 5 Whys Analysis to ask “why” five times for each potential root cause identified to determine the underlying cause of the problem. Check out our 5 Whys Analysis Template to support this

Step 4: Once the root cause has been identified, develop and implement solutions to address it.

Here is an example of how a complete Ishikawa Diagram may look with potential problems identified on it.

To summarise, Ishikawa Diagrams are an effective problem-solving tool that can be combined with the five whys technique to identify the root cause of a problem. Teams can develop more effective and long-term solutions to improve their processes and operations by analysing potential causes and asking “why” to drill down into the underlying issue.

Examples of Business Problems Solved with Ishikawa Diagrams

Ishikawa Diagrams, also known as fishbone diagrams, have been used to solve a wide range of business problems. Here are some real-world examples of business problems solved with Ishikawa Diagrams:

Quality control issues in a manufacturing plant

A manufacturing plant was experiencing quality control issues with their products. The problem was identified using an Ishikawa Diagram, which helped the team to identify the potential causes of the problem. The diagram revealed that the issues were caused by a lack of training among the employees, poor machine maintenance, and inadequate raw materials. By addressing these issues, the plant was able to improve the quality of its products and reduce waste.

A call centre has a high employee turnover rate.

A call center’s ability to provide quality customer service was being hampered by high employee turnover. An Ishikawa Diagram was used to identify the problem, which assisted the team in determining the potential causes of the high turnover rate. According to the diagram, the problems were caused by low employee morale, insufficient training, and a lack of career development opportunities. The call centre was able to improve employee satisfaction and retention rates by addressing these issues.

Inventory management in a retail store is inefficient.

A retail store’s inventory management process was inefficient, resulting in excess inventory and stockouts. An Ishikawa Diagram was used to identify the problem, which assisted the team in determining the potential causes of the inefficiencies. According to the diagram, the problems were caused by inaccurate demand forecasting, insufficient inventory tracking, and poor communication among the store’s departments. The store was able to improve its inventory management process, reduce excess inventory, and prevent stockouts by addressing these issues.

The Ishikawa Diagram was used as a problem-solving tool in each of these examples to identify potential causes of the problem. The diagram enabled the teams to brainstorm and organise the various factors that could be contributing to the problem, allowing them to drill down to the root cause. The teams were able to implement more effective and long-term solutions to improve their processes and operations by addressing the root cause.

The advantages of using Ishikawa Diagrams in these scenarios include improved quality control, reduced waste, increased employee retention and satisfaction, and increased inventory management efficiency. The diagram enabled the teams to take a structured approach to problem-solving, allowing them to identify the root cause of the problem and develop more effective solutions.

Best Practice for Ishikawa Diagrams

Ishikawa Diagrams are a powerful problem-solving tool, but they must be used correctly to produce the desired results. Some best practises for using Ishikawa Diagrams in problem-solving processes are as follows:

• Clearly define the problem: Before you create an Ishikawa Diagram, you must first define the problem you are attempting to solve. This will aid your concentration and ensure that your diagram is relevant and effective.
• Involve a diverse team: Ishikawa Diagrams work best when used in a group setting. To ensure a well-rounded perspective, try to include a diverse group of people from various departments or areas of expertise.
• Brainstorm potential causes: Encourage team members to brainstorm all potential causes of the problem when creating the diagram. This will assist you in identifying all potential root causes and ensuring that your solutions are all-inclusive.
• Use clear and concise language: When labelling the branches of the diagram, use clear and concise language to ensure that everyone understands the meaning. Avoid using jargon or abbreviations that may be confusing to some team members.
• Prioritize potential causes: After identifying all potential causes, prioritise them based on their likelihood of contributing to the problem. This will allow you to concentrate your efforts on the most pressing root causes.
• Verify the root cause: Before implementing any solutions, test your hypothesis to determine the root cause of the problem. This will help you ensure that you are treating the underlying cause of the problem rather than just the symptoms.

Avoiding Common Mistakes When Using Ishikawa Diagrams

While Ishikawa Diagrams can be a useful problem-solving tool, there are some common errors that teams can make when creating and using them. Here are some errors to avoid:

• Jumping to conclusions: It is critical to avoid jumping to conclusions before identifying and evaluating all potential causes. Rushing to solutions without fully comprehending the underlying cause of the problem can result in ineffective and costly solutions.
• Excessive diagram complexity: Keep the diagram simple and focused on the problem at hand. Overcomplicating the diagram with too many branches or irrelevant information can make determining the true root cause of the problem difficult.
• Ignoring other sources of information: While Ishikawa Diagrams are a powerful tool, they should not be used as the sole source of information in problem-solving processes. Other data sources to consider include customer feedback, process data, and employee input.

Teams can effectively use Ishikawa Diagrams to identify and address the root causes of business problems by adhering to these best practises and avoiding common pitfalls.

Finally, Ishikawa Diagrams are a useful tool for solving business problems and determining the root causes of problems. Teams can effectively use Ishikawa Diagrams to find comprehensive solutions by following best practices such as clearly defining the problem, involving a diverse team, brainstorming potential causes, and prioritising root causes.

It’s critical to remember that Ishikawa diagrams should be used in conjunction with other sources of information to ensure a well-rounded approach to problem-solving. Teams can effectively leverage the power of Ishikawa diagrams in their problem-solving processes by avoiding common mistakes such as overcomplicating the diagram and jumping to conclusions.

Finally, using Ishikawa Diagrams to solve business problems can result in better processes, higher customer satisfaction, and a more efficient organisation. Teams can achieve greater success and propel their businesses forward by mastering this powerful tool.

• Ilie, G. and Ciocoiu, C.N., 2010. Application of fishbone diagram to determine the risk of an event with multiple causes .  Management research and practice ,  2 (1), pp.1-20.
• Radziwill, N., 2017. Creating ishikawa (fishbone) diagrams with R.   Software Quality Professional ,  20 (1), pp.47-48.

Daniel Croft

Daniel Croft is a seasoned continuous improvement manager with a Black Belt in Lean Six Sigma. With over 10 years of real-world application experience across diverse sectors, Daniel has a passion for optimizing processes and fostering a culture of efficiency. He's not just a practitioner but also an avid learner, constantly seeking to expand his knowledge. Outside of his professional life, Daniel has a keen Investing, statistics and knowledge-sharing, which led him to create the website learnleansigma.com, a platform dedicated to Lean Six Sigma and process improvement insights.

Free Lean Six Sigma Templates

Improve your Lean Six Sigma projects with our free templates. They're designed to make implementation and management easier, helping you achieve better results.

5S Floor Marking Best Practices

In lean manufacturing, the 5S System is a foundational tool, involving the steps: Sort, Set…

How to Measure the ROI of Continuous Improvement Initiatives

When it comes to business, knowing the value you’re getting for your money is crucial,…

8D Problem-Solving: Common Mistakes to Avoid

In today’s competitive business landscape, effective problem-solving is the cornerstone of organizational success. The 8D…

The Evolution of 8D Problem-Solving: From Basics to Excellence

In a world where efficiency and effectiveness are more than just buzzwords, the need for…

8D: Tools and Techniques

Are you grappling with recurring problems in your organization and searching for a structured way…

How to Select the Right Lean Six Sigma Projects: A Comprehensive Guide

Going on a Lean Six Sigma journey is an invigorating experience filled with opportunities for…