why homework should be banned podcast

Is it time to get rid of homework? Mental health experts weigh in.

It's no secret that kids hate homework. And as students grapple with an ongoing pandemic that has had a wide range of mental health impacts, is it time schools start listening to their pleas about workloads?

Some teachers are turning to social media to take a stand against homework.

Tiktok user @misguided.teacher says he doesn't assign it because the "whole premise of homework is flawed."

For starters, he says, he can't grade work on "even playing fields" when students' home environments can be vastly different.

"Even students who go home to a peaceful house, do they really want to spend their time on busy work? Because typically that's what a lot of homework is, it's busy work," he says in the video that has garnered 1.6 million likes. "You only get one year to be 7, you only got one year to be 10, you only get one year to be 16, 18."

Mental health experts agree heavy workloads have the potential do more harm than good for students, especially when taking into account the impacts of the pandemic. But they also say the answer may not be to eliminate homework altogether.

Emmy Kang, mental health counselor at Humantold , says studies have shown heavy workloads can be "detrimental" for students and cause a "big impact on their mental, physical and emotional health."

"More than half of students say that homework is their primary source of stress, and we know what stress can do on our bodies," she says, adding that staying up late to finish assignments also leads to disrupted sleep and exhaustion.

Cynthia Catchings, a licensed clinical social worker and therapist at Talkspace , says heavy workloads can also cause serious mental health problems in the long run, like anxiety and depression.

And for all the distress homework can cause, it's not as useful as many may think, says Dr. Nicholas Kardaras, a psychologist and CEO of Omega Recovery treatment center.

"The research shows that there's really limited benefit of homework for elementary age students, that really the school work should be contained in the classroom," he says.

For older students, Kang says, homework benefits plateau at about two hours per night.

"Most students, especially at these high achieving schools, they're doing a minimum of three hours, and it's taking away time from their friends, from their families, their extracurricular activities. And these are all very important things for a person's mental and emotional health."

Catchings, who also taught third to 12th graders for 12 years, says she's seen the positive effects of a no-homework policy while working with students abroad.

"Not having homework was something that I always admired from the French students (and) the French schools, because that was helping the students to really have the time off and really disconnect from school," she says.

The answer may not be to eliminate homework completely but to be more mindful of the type of work students take home, suggests Kang, who was a high school teacher for 10 years.

"I don't think (we) should scrap homework; I think we should scrap meaningless, purposeless busy work-type homework. That's something that needs to be scrapped entirely," she says, encouraging teachers to be thoughtful and consider the amount of time it would take for students to complete assignments.

The pandemic made the conversation around homework more crucial

Mindfulness surrounding homework is especially important in the context of the past two years. Many students will be struggling with mental health issues that were brought on or worsened by the pandemic , making heavy workloads even harder to balance.

"COVID was just a disaster in terms of the lack of structure. Everything just deteriorated," Kardaras says, pointing to an increase in cognitive issues and decrease in attention spans among students. "School acts as an anchor for a lot of children, as a stabilizing force, and that disappeared."

But even if students transition back to the structure of in-person classes, Kardaras suspects students may still struggle after two school years of shifted schedules and disrupted sleeping habits.

"We've seen adults struggling to go back to in-person work environments from remote work environments. That effect is amplified with children because children have less resources to be able to cope with those transitions than adults do," he explains.

'Get organized' ahead of back-to-school

In order to make the transition back to in-person school easier, Kang encourages students to "get good sleep, exercise regularly (and) eat a healthy diet."

To help manage workloads, she suggests students "get organized."

"There's so much mental clutter up there when you're disorganized. ... Sitting down and planning out their study schedules can really help manage their time," she says.

Breaking up assignments can also make things easier to tackle.

"I know that heavy workloads can be stressful, but if you sit down and you break down that studying into smaller chunks, they're much more manageable."

If workloads are still too much, Kang encourages students to advocate for themselves.

"They should tell their teachers when a homework assignment just took too much time or if it was too difficult for them to do on their own," she says. "It's good to speak up and ask those questions. Respectfully, of course, because these are your teachers. But still, I think sometimes teachers themselves need this feedback from their students."

More: Some teachers let their students sleep in class. Here's what mental health experts say.

More: Some parents are slipping young kids in for the COVID-19 vaccine, but doctors discourage the move as 'risky'

25 Reasons Homework Should Be Banned (Busywork Arguments)

As students across the globe plow through heaps of homework each night, one question lingers in the minds of educators, parents, and students alike: should homework be banned?

This question is not new, yet it continues to spark lively debate as research findings, anecdotal evidence, and personal experiences paint a complex picture of the pros and cons of homework.

On one hand, proponents of homework argue that it reinforces classroom learning, encourages a disciplined work ethic, and provides teachers with valuable insight into student comprehension. They see homework as an extension of classroom instruction that solidifies and enriches learning while fostering important skills like time management and self-discipline. It also offers an opportunity for parents to be involved in their children's education.

However, some people say there are a lot of downsides. They argue that excessive homework can lead to stress and burnout, reduce time for extracurricular activities and family interactions, exacerbate educational inequalities, and even negatively impact students' mental health.

This article presents 25 reasons why we might need to seriously consider this radical shift in our educational approach. But first, lets share some examples of what homework actually is.

Examples of Homework

These examples cover a wide range of subjects and complexity levels, reflecting the variety of homework assignments students might encounter throughout their educational journey.

Spelling lists to memorize for a test
Math worksheets for practicing basic arithmetic operations
Reading assignments from children's books
Simple science projects like growing a plant
Basic geography assignments like labeling a map
Art projects like drawing a family portrait
Writing book reports or essays
Advanced math problems
Research projects on various topics
Lab reports for science experiments
Reading and responding to literature
Preparing presentations on various topics
Advanced math problems involving calculus or algebra
Reading classic literature and writing analytical essays
Research papers on historical events
Lab reports for advanced science experiments
Foreign language exercises
Preparing for standardized tests
College application essays
Extensive research papers
In-depth case studies
Advanced problem-solving in subjects like physics, engineering, etc.
Thesis or dissertation writing
Extensive reading and literature reviews
Internship or practicum experiences

Lack of proven benefits

Homework has long been a staple of traditional education, dating back centuries. However, the actual efficacy of homework in enhancing learning outcomes remains disputed. A number of studies indicate that there's no conclusive evidence supporting the notion that homework improves academic performance, especially in primary education . In fact, research suggests that for younger students, the correlation between homework and academic achievement is weak or even negative .

Too much homework can often lead to increased stress and decreased enthusiasm for learning. This issue becomes particularly pressing when considering the common 'more is better' approach to homework, where the quantity of work given to students often outweighs the quality and effectiveness of the tasks. For instance, spending countless hours memorizing facts for a history test may not necessarily translate to better understanding or long-term retention of the subject matter.

However, it's worth noting that homework isn't completely devoid of benefits. It can help foster self-discipline, time management skills, and the ability to work independently. But, these positive outcomes are usually more pronounced in older students and when homework assignments are thoughtfully designed and not excessive in volume.

When discussing the merits and drawbacks of homework, it's critical to consider the nature of the assignments. Routine, repetitive tasks often associated with 'drill-and-practice' homework, such as completing rows of arithmetic problems or copying definitions from a textbook, rarely lead to meaningful learning. On the other hand, assignments that encourage students to apply what they've learned in class, solve problems, or engage creatively with the material can be more beneficial.

Increased stress

Homework can often lead to a significant increase in stress levels among students. This is especially true when students are burdened with large volumes of homework, leaving them with little time to relax or pursue other activities. The feeling of constantly racing against the clock to meet deadlines can contribute to anxiety, frustration, and even burnout.

Contrary to popular belief, stress does not necessarily improve performance or productivity. In fact, high levels of stress can negatively impact memory, concentration, and overall cognitive function. This counteracts the very purpose of homework, which is intended to reinforce learning and improve academic outcomes.

However, one might argue that homework can teach students about time management, organization, and how to handle pressure. These are important life skills that could potentially prepare them for future responsibilities. But it's essential to strike a balance. The pressure to complete homework should not come at the cost of a student's mental wellbeing.

Limited family time

Homework often infringes upon the time students can spend with their families. After spending the entire day in school, children come home to yet more academic work, leaving little room for quality family interactions. This limited family time can hinder the development of important interpersonal skills and familial bonds.

Moreover, family time isn't just about fun and relaxation. It also plays a crucial role in the social and emotional development of children. Opportunities for unstructured play, family conversations, and shared activities can contribute to children's well-being and character building.

Nonetheless, advocates of homework might argue that it can be a platform for parental involvement in a child's education. While this may be true, the involvement should not transform into parental control or cause friction due to differing expectations and pressures.

Reduced physical activity

Homework can often lead to reduced physical activity by eating into the time students have for sports, recreation, and simply being outdoors. Physical activity is essential for children's health, well-being, and even their academic performance. Research suggests that physical activity can enhance cognitive abilities, improve concentration, and reduce symptoms of ADHD .

Homework, especially when it's boring and repetitive, can deter students from engaging in physical activities, leading to a sedentary lifestyle. This lack of balance between work and play can contribute to physical health problems such as obesity, poor posture, and related health concerns.

Homework proponents might point out that disciplined time management could allow students to balance both work and play. However, given the demanding nature of many homework assignments, achieving this balance is often easier said than done.

Negative impact on sleep

A significant concern about homework is its impact on students' sleep patterns. Numerous studies have linked excessive homework to sleep deprivation in students. Children often stay up late to complete assignments, reducing the amount of sleep they get. Lack of sleep can result in a host of issues, from poor academic performance and difficulty concentrating to physical health problems like weakened immunity.

Even the quality of sleep can be affected. The stress and anxiety from a heavy workload can lead to difficulty falling asleep or restless nights. And let's not forget that students often need to wake up early for school, compounding the negative effects of late-night homework sessions.

On the other hand, some argue that homework can teach children time management skills, suggesting that effective organization could help prevent late-night work. However, when schools assign excessive amounts of homework, even the best time management might not prevent encroachment on sleep time.

Homework can exacerbate existing educational inequalities. Not all students have access to a conducive learning environment at home, necessary resources, or support from educated family members. For these students, homework can become a source of stress and disadvantage rather than an opportunity to reinforce learning.

Children from lower socio-economic backgrounds might need to contribute to household chores or part-time work, limiting the time they have for homework. This can create a gap in academic performance and grades, reflecting not on the students' abilities but their circumstances.

While homework is meant to level the playing field by providing additional learning time outside school, it often does the opposite. It's worth noting that students from privileged backgrounds can often access additional help like tutoring, further widening the gap.

Reduced creativity and independent thinking

Homework, particularly when it involves rote learning or repetitive tasks, can stifle creativity and independent thinking. Students often focus on getting the "right" answers to please teachers rather than exploring different ideas and solutions. This can hinder their ability to think creatively and solve problems independently, skills that are increasingly in demand in the modern world.

Homework defenders might claim that it can also promote independent learning. True, when thoughtfully designed, homework can encourage this. But, voluminous or repetitive tasks tend to promote compliance over creativity.

Diminished interest in learning

Overburdening students with homework can diminish their interest in learning. After long hours in school followed by more academic tasks at home, learning can begin to feel like a chore. This can lead to a decline in intrinsic motivation and an unhealthy association of learning with stress and exhaustion.

In theory, homework can deepen interest in a subject, especially when it involves projects or research. Yet, an excess of homework, particularly routine tasks, might achieve the opposite, turning learning into a source of stress rather than enjoyment.

Inability to pursue personal interests

Homework can limit students' ability to pursue personal interests. Hobbies, personal projects, and leisure activities are crucial for personal development and well-being. With heavy homework loads, students may struggle to find time for these activities, missing out on opportunities to discover new interests and talents.

Supporters of homework might argue that it teaches students to manage their time effectively. However, even with good time management, an overload of homework can crowd out time for personal interests.

Excessive workload

The issue of excessive workload is a common complaint among students. Spending several hours on homework after a full school day can be mentally and physically draining. This workload can lead to burnout, decreased motivation, and negative attitudes toward school and learning.

While homework can help consolidate classroom learning, too much can be counterproductive. It's important to consider the overall workload of students, including school, extracurricular activities, and personal time, when assigning homework.

Limited time for reflection

Homework can limit the time students have for reflection. Reflection is a critical part of learning, allowing students to digest and integrate new information. With the constant flow of assignments, there's often little time left for this crucial process. Consequently, the learning becomes superficial, and the true understanding of subjects can be compromised.

Although homework is meant to reinforce what's taught in class, the lack of downtime for reflection might hinder deep learning. It's important to remember that learning is not just about doing, but also about thinking.

Increased pressure on young children

Young children are particularly vulnerable to the pressures of homework. At an age where play and exploration are vital for cognitive and emotional development, too much homework can create undue pressure and stress. This pressure can instigate a negative relationship with learning from an early age, potentially impacting their future attitude towards education.

Advocates of homework often argue that it prepares children for the rigors of their future academic journey. However, placing too much academic pressure on young children might overshadow the importance of learning through play and exploration.

Lack of alignment with real-world skills

Traditional homework often lacks alignment with real-world skills. Assignments typically focus on academic abilities at the expense of skills like creativity, problem-solving, and emotional intelligence. These are crucial for success in the modern workplace and are often under-emphasized in homework tasks.

Homework can be an opportunity to develop these skills when properly structured. However, tasks often focus on memorization and repetition, rather than cultivating skills relevant to the real world.

Loss of motivation

Excessive homework can lead to a loss of motivation. The constant pressure to complete assignments and meet deadlines can diminish a student's intrinsic motivation to learn. This loss of motivation might not only affect their academic performance but also their love of learning, potentially having long-term effects on their educational journey.

Some believe homework instills discipline and responsibility. But, it's important to balance these benefits against the potential for homework to undermine motivation and engagement.

Disruption of work-life balance

Maintaining a healthy work-life balance is as important for students as it is for adults. Overloading students with homework can disrupt this balance, leaving little time for relaxation, socializing, and extracurricular activities. All of these are vital for a student's overall development and well-being.

Homework supporters might argue that it prepares students for the workloads they'll face in college and beyond. But it's also crucial to ensure students have time to relax, recharge, and engage in non-academic activities for a well-rounded development.

Impact on mental health

There's a growing body of evidence showing the negative impact of excessive homework on students' mental health. The stress and anxiety from heavy homework loads can contribute to issues like depression, anxiety, and even thoughts of suicide. Student well-being should be a top priority in education, and the impact of homework on mental health cannot be ignored.

While some might argue that homework helps students develop resilience and coping skills, it's important to ensure these potential benefits don't come at the expense of students' mental health.

Limited time for self-care

With excessive homework, students often find little time for essential self-care activities. These can include physical exercise, proper rest, healthy eating, mindfulness, or even simple leisure activities. These activities are critical for maintaining physical health, emotional well-being, and cognitive function.

Some might argue that managing homework alongside self-care responsibilities teaches students valuable life skills. However, it's important that these skills don't come at the cost of students' health and well-being.

Decreased family involvement

Homework can inadvertently lead to decreased family involvement in a child's learning. Parents often feel unqualified or too busy to help with homework, leading to missed opportunities for family learning interactions. This can also create stress and conflict within the family, especially when parents have high expectations or are unable to assist.

Some believe homework can facilitate parental involvement in education. But, when it becomes a source of stress or conflict, it can discourage parents from engaging in their child's learning.

Reinforcement of inequalities

Homework can unintentionally reinforce inequalities. Students from disadvantaged backgrounds might lack access to resources like private tutors or a quiet study space, placing them at a disadvantage compared to their more privileged peers. Additionally, these students might have additional responsibilities at home, further limiting their time to complete homework.

While the purpose of homework is often to provide additional learning opportunities, it can inadvertently reinforce existing disparities. Therefore, it's essential to ensure that homework doesn't favor students who have more resources at home.

Reduced time for play and creativity

Homework can take away from time for play and creative activities. These activities are not only enjoyable but also crucial for the cognitive, social, and emotional development of children. Play allows children to explore, imagine, and create, fostering innovative thinking and problem-solving skills.

Some may argue that homework teaches discipline and responsibility. Yet, it's vital to remember that play also has significant learning benefits and should be a part of every child's daily routine.

Increased cheating and academic dishonesty

The pressure to complete homework can sometimes lead to increased cheating and academic dishonesty. When faced with a large volume of homework, students might resort to copying from friends or searching for answers online. This undermines the educational value of homework and fosters unhealthy academic practices.

While homework is intended to consolidate learning, the risk of promoting dishonest behaviors is a concern that needs to be addressed.

Strained teacher-student relationships

Excessive homework can strain teacher-student relationships. If students begin to associate teachers with stress or anxiety from homework, it can hinder the development of a positive learning relationship. Furthermore, if teachers are perceived as being unfair or insensitive with their homework demands, it can impact the overall classroom dynamic.

While homework can provide an opportunity for teachers to monitor student progress, it's important to ensure that it doesn't negatively affect the teacher-student relationship.

Negative impact on family dynamics

Homework can impact family dynamics. Parents might feel compelled to enforce homework completion, leading to potential conflict, stress, and tension within the family. These situations can disrupt the harmony in the household and strain relationships.

Homework is sometimes seen as a tool to engage parents in their child's education. However, it's crucial to ensure that this involvement doesn't turn into a source of conflict or pressure.

Cultural and individual differences

Homework might not take into account cultural and individual differences. Education is not a one-size-fits-all process, and what works for one student might not work for another. Some students might thrive on hands-on learning, while others prefer auditory or visual learning methods. By standardizing homework, we might ignore these individual learning styles and preferences.

Homework can also overlook cultural differences. For students from diverse cultural backgrounds, certain types of homework might seem irrelevant or difficult to relate to, leading to disengagement or confusion.

Encouragement of surface-level learning

Homework often encourages surface-level learning instead of deep understanding. When students are swamped with homework, they're likely to rush through assignments to get them done, rather than taking the time to understand the concepts. This can result in superficial learning where students memorize information to regurgitate it on assignments and tests, instead of truly understanding and internalizing the knowledge.

While homework is meant to reinforce classroom learning, the quality of learning is more important than the quantity. It's important to design homework in a way that encourages deep, meaningful learning instead of mere rote memorization.

Diathesis-Stress Model (Definition + Examples)
HPA Axis (Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal Axis)
General Adaptation Syndrome Theory
Careers in Psychology
The Stress Response (General Adaptation Syndome)

Reference this article:

About The Author

Free Personality Test

Free Memory Test

Free IQ Test

PracticalPie.com is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Youtube Facebook Instagram X/Twitter

Psychology Resources

Developmental

Personality

Relationships

Psychologists

Serial Killers

Psychology Tests

Personality Quiz

Memory Test

Depression test

Type A/B Personality Test

An illustration shows an open math workbook and a pencil writing numbers in it, while the previous page disintegrates and floats away.

Filed under:

The Highlight

Nobody knows what the point of homework is

The homework wars are back.

Share this story

Share this on Facebook
Share this on Twitter
Share this on Reddit
Share All sharing options

Share All sharing options for: Nobody knows what the point of homework is

As the Covid-19 pandemic began and students logged into their remote classrooms, all work, in effect, became homework. But whether or not students could complete it at home varied. For some, schoolwork became public-library work or McDonald’s-parking-lot work.

Luis Torres, the principal of PS 55, a predominantly low-income community elementary school in the south Bronx, told me that his school secured Chromebooks for students early in the pandemic only to learn that some lived in shelters that blocked wifi for security reasons. Others, who lived in housing projects with poor internet reception, did their schoolwork in laundromats.

According to a 2021 Pew survey , 25 percent of lower-income parents said their children, at some point, were unable to complete their schoolwork because they couldn’t access a computer at home; that number for upper-income parents was 2 percent.

The issues with remote learning in March 2020 were new. But they highlighted a divide that had been there all along in another form: homework. And even long after schools have resumed in-person classes, the pandemic’s effects on homework have lingered.

Over the past three years, in response to concerns about equity, schools across the country, including in Sacramento, Los Angeles , San Diego , and Clark County, Nevada , made permanent changes to their homework policies that restricted how much homework could be given and how it could be graded after in-person learning resumed.

Three years into the pandemic, as districts and teachers reckon with Covid-era overhauls of teaching and learning, schools are still reconsidering the purpose and place of homework. Whether relaxing homework expectations helps level the playing field between students or harms them by decreasing rigor is a divisive issue without conclusive evidence on either side, echoing other debates in education like the elimination of standardized test scores from some colleges’ admissions processes.

I first began to wonder if the homework abolition movement made sense after speaking with teachers in some Massachusetts public schools, who argued that rather than help disadvantaged kids, stringent homework restrictions communicated an attitude of low expectations. One, an English teacher, said she felt the school had “just given up” on trying to get the students to do work; another argued that restrictions that prohibit teachers from assigning take-home work that doesn’t begin in class made it difficult to get through the foreign-language curriculum. Teachers in other districts have raised formal concerns about homework abolition’s ability to close gaps among students rather than widening them.

Many education experts share this view. Harris Cooper, a professor emeritus of psychology at Duke who has studied homework efficacy, likened homework abolition to “playing to the lowest common denominator.”

But as I learned after talking to a variety of stakeholders — from homework researchers to policymakers to parents of schoolchildren — whether to abolish homework probably isn’t the right question. More important is what kind of work students are sent home with and where they can complete it. Chances are, if schools think more deeply about giving constructive work, time spent on homework will come down regardless.

There’s no consensus on whether homework works

The rise of the no-homework movement during the Covid-19 pandemic tapped into long-running disagreements over homework’s impact on students. The purpose and effectiveness of homework have been disputed for well over a century. In 1901, for instance, California banned homework for students up to age 15, and limited it for older students, over concerns that it endangered children’s mental and physical health. The newest iteration of the anti-homework argument contends that the current practice punishes students who lack support and rewards those with more resources, reinforcing the “myth of meritocracy.”

But there is still no research consensus on homework’s effectiveness; no one can seem to agree on what the right metrics are. Much of the debate relies on anecdotes, intuition, or speculation.

Researchers disagree even on how much research exists on the value of homework. Kathleen Budge, the co-author of Turning High-Poverty Schools Into High-Performing Schools and a professor at Boise State, told me that homework “has been greatly researched.” Denise Pope, a Stanford lecturer and leader of the education nonprofit Challenge Success, said, “It’s not a highly researched area because of some of the methodological problems.”

Experts who are more sympathetic to take-home assignments generally support the “10-minute rule,” a framework that estimates the ideal amount of homework on any given night by multiplying the student’s grade by 10 minutes. (A ninth grader, for example, would have about 90 minutes of work a night.) Homework proponents argue that while it is difficult to design randomized control studies to test homework’s effectiveness, the vast majority of existing studies show a strong positive correlation between homework and high academic achievement for middle and high school students. Prominent critics of homework argue that these correlational studies are unreliable and point to studies that suggest a neutral or negative effect on student performance. Both agree there is little to no evidence for homework’s effectiveness at an elementary school level, though proponents often argue that it builds constructive habits for the future.

For anyone who remembers homework assignments from both good and bad teachers, this fundamental disagreement might not be surprising. Some homework is pointless and frustrating to complete. Every week during my senior year of high school, I had to analyze a poem for English and decorate it with images found on Google; my most distinct memory from that class is receiving a demoralizing 25-point deduction because I failed to present my analysis on a poster board. Other assignments really do help students learn: After making an adapted version of Chairman Mao’s Little Red Book for a ninth grade history project, I was inspired to check out from the library and read a biography of the Chinese ruler.

For homework opponents, the first example is more likely to resonate. “We’re all familiar with the negative effects of homework: stress, exhaustion, family conflict, less time for other activities, diminished interest in learning,” Alfie Kohn, author of The Homework Myth, which challenges common justifications for homework, told me in an email. “And these effects may be most pronounced among low-income students.” Kohn believes that schools should make permanent any moratoria implemented during the pandemic, arguing that there are no positives at all to outweigh homework’s downsides. Recent studies , he argues , show the benefits may not even materialize during high school.

In the Marlborough Public Schools, a suburban district 45 minutes west of Boston, school policy committee chair Katherine Hennessy described getting kids to complete their homework during remote education as “a challenge, to say the least.” Teachers found that students who spent all day on their computers didn’t want to spend more time online when the day was over. So, for a few months, the school relaxed the usual practice and teachers slashed the quantity of nightly homework.

Online learning made the preexisting divides between students more apparent, she said. Many students, even during normal circumstances, lacked resources to keep them on track and focused on completing take-home assignments. Though Marlborough Schools is more affluent than PS 55, Hennessy said many students had parents whose work schedules left them unable to provide homework help in the evenings. The experience tracked with a common divide in the country between children of different socioeconomic backgrounds.

So in October 2021, months after the homework reduction began, the Marlborough committee made a change to the district’s policy. While teachers could still give homework, the assignments had to begin as classwork. And though teachers could acknowledge homework completion in a student’s participation grade, they couldn’t count homework as its own grading category. “Rigorous learning in the classroom does not mean that that classwork must be assigned every night,” the policy stated . “Extensions of class work is not to be used to teach new content or as a form of punishment.”

Canceling homework might not do anything for the achievement gap

The critiques of homework are valid as far as they go, but at a certain point, arguments against homework can defy the commonsense idea that to retain what they’re learning, students need to practice it.

“Doesn’t a kid become a better reader if he reads more? Doesn’t a kid learn his math facts better if he practices them?” said Cathy Vatterott, an education researcher and professor emeritus at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. After decades of research, she said it’s still hard to isolate the value of homework, but that doesn’t mean it should be abandoned.

Blanket vilification of homework can also conflate the unique challenges facing disadvantaged students as compared to affluent ones, which could have different solutions. “The kids in the low-income schools are being hurt because they’re being graded, unfairly, on time they just don’t have to do this stuff,” Pope told me. “And they’re still being held accountable for turning in assignments, whether they’re meaningful or not.” On the other side, “Palo Alto kids” — students in Silicon Valley’s stereotypically pressure-cooker public schools — “are just bombarded and overloaded and trying to stay above water.”

Merely getting rid of homework doesn’t solve either problem. The United States already has the second-highest disparity among OECD (the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) nations between time spent on homework by students of high and low socioeconomic status — a difference of more than three hours, said Janine Bempechat, clinical professor at Boston University and author of No More Mindless Homework .

When she interviewed teachers in Boston-area schools that had cut homework before the pandemic, Bempechat told me, “What they saw immediately was parents who could afford it immediately enrolled their children in the Russian School of Mathematics,” a math-enrichment program whose tuition ranges from $140 to about $400 a month. Getting rid of homework “does nothing for equity; it increases the opportunity gap between wealthier and less wealthy families,” she said. “That solution troubles me because it’s no solution at all.”

A group of teachers at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia, made the same point after the school district proposed an overhaul of its homework policies, including removing penalties for missing homework deadlines, allowing unlimited retakes, and prohibiting grading of homework.

“Given the emphasis on equity in today’s education systems,” they wrote in a letter to the school board, “we believe that some of the proposed changes will actually have a detrimental impact towards achieving this goal. Families that have means could still provide challenging and engaging academic experiences for their children and will continue to do so, especially if their children are not experiencing expected rigor in the classroom.” At a school where more than a third of students are low-income, the teachers argued, the policies would prompt students “to expect the least of themselves in terms of effort, results, and responsibility.”

Not all homework is created equal

Despite their opposing sides in the homework wars, most of the researchers I spoke to made a lot of the same points. Both Bempechat and Pope were quick to bring up how parents and schools confuse rigor with workload, treating the volume of assignments as a proxy for quality of learning. Bempechat, who is known for defending homework, has written extensively about how plenty of it lacks clear purpose, requires the purchasing of unnecessary supplies, and takes longer than it needs to. Likewise, when Pope instructs graduate-level classes on curriculum, she asks her students to think about the larger purpose they’re trying to achieve with homework: If they can get the job done in the classroom, there’s no point in sending home more work.

At its best, pandemic-era teaching facilitated that last approach. Honolulu-based teacher Christina Torres Cawdery told me that, early in the pandemic, she often had a cohort of kids in her classroom for four hours straight, as her school tried to avoid too much commingling. She couldn’t lecture for four hours, so she gave the students plenty of time to complete independent and project-based work. At the end of most school days, she didn’t feel the need to send them home with more to do.

A similar limited-homework philosophy worked at a public middle school in Chelsea, Massachusetts. A couple of teachers there turned as much class as possible into an opportunity for small-group practice, allowing kids to work on problems that traditionally would be assigned for homework, Jessica Flick, a math coach who leads department meetings at the school, told me. It was inspired by a philosophy pioneered by Simon Fraser University professor Peter Liljedahl, whose influential book Building Thinking Classrooms in Mathematics reframes homework as “check-your-understanding questions” rather than as compulsory work. Last year, Flick found that the two eighth grade classes whose teachers adopted this strategy performed the best on state tests, and this year, she has encouraged other teachers to implement it.

Teachers know that plenty of homework is tedious and unproductive. Jeannemarie Dawson De Quiroz, who has taught for more than 20 years in low-income Boston and Los Angeles pilot and charter schools, says that in her first years on the job she frequently assigned “drill and kill” tasks and questions that she now feels unfairly stumped students. She said designing good homework wasn’t part of her teaching programs, nor was it meaningfully discussed in professional development. With more experience, she turned as much class time as she could into practice time and limited what she sent home.

“The thing about homework that’s sticky is that not all homework is created equal,” says Jill Harrison Berg, a former teacher and the author of Uprooting Instructional Inequity . “Some homework is a genuine waste of time and requires lots of resources for no good reason. And other homework is really useful.”

Cutting homework has to be part of a larger strategy

The takeaways are clear: Schools can make cuts to homework, but those cuts should be part of a strategy to improve the quality of education for all students. If the point of homework was to provide more practice, districts should think about how students can make it up during class — or offer time during or after school for students to seek help from teachers. If it was to move the curriculum along, it’s worth considering whether strategies like Liljedahl’s can get more done in less time.

Some of the best thinking around effective assignments comes from those most critical of the current practice. Denise Pope proposes that, before assigning homework, teachers should consider whether students understand the purpose of the work and whether they can do it without help. If teachers think it’s something that can’t be done in class, they should be mindful of how much time it should take and the feedback they should provide. It’s questions like these that De Quiroz considered before reducing the volume of work she sent home.

More than a year after the new homework policy began in Marlborough, Hennessy still hears from parents who incorrectly “think homework isn’t happening” despite repeated assurances that kids still can receive work. She thinks part of the reason is that education has changed over the years. “I think what we’re trying to do is establish that homework may be an element of educating students,” she told me. “But it may not be what parents think of as what they grew up with. ... It’s going to need to adapt, per the teaching and the curriculum, and how it’s being delivered in each classroom.”

For the policy to work, faculty, parents, and students will all have to buy into a shared vision of what school ought to look like. The district is working on it — in November, it hosted and uploaded to YouTube a round-table discussion on homework between district administrators — but considering the sustained confusion, the path ahead seems difficult.

When I asked Luis Torres about whether he thought homework serves a useful part in PS 55’s curriculum, he said yes, of course it was — despite the effort and money it takes to keep the school open after hours to help them do it. “The children need the opportunity to practice,” he said. “If you don’t give them opportunities to practice what they learn, they’re going to forget.” But Torres doesn’t care if the work is done at home. The school stays open until around 6 pm on weekdays, even during breaks. Tutors through New York City’s Department of Youth and Community Development programs help kids with work after school so they don’t need to take it with them.

As schools weigh the purpose of homework in an unequal world, it’s tempting to dispose of a practice that presents real, practical problems to students across the country. But getting rid of homework is unlikely to do much good on its own. Before cutting it, it’s worth thinking about what good assignments are meant to do in the first place. It’s crucial that students from all socioeconomic backgrounds tackle complex quantitative problems and hone their reading and writing skills. It’s less important that the work comes home with them.

Jacob Sweet is a freelance writer in Somerville, Massachusetts. He is a frequent contributor to the New Yorker, among other publications.

Will you help keep Vox free for all?

Millions rely on Vox’s journalism to understand the coronavirus crisis. We believe it pays off for all of us, as a society and a democracy, when our neighbors and fellow citizens can access clear, concise information on the pandemic. But our distinctive explanatory journalism is expensive. Support from our readers helps us keep it free for everyone. If you have already made a financial contribution to Vox, thank you. If not, please consider making a contribution today from as little as $3.

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via

Can we protect and profit from the oceans?

Sometimes kids need a push. here’s how to do it kindly., who gets to flourish, sign up for the newsletter today, explained, thanks for signing up.

Check your inbox for a welcome email.

Oops. Something went wrong. Please enter a valid email and try again.

Grades 6-12
School Leaders

FREE Book Bracket Template. For March and Beyond!

Should We Ban Homework?

The cons of homework are starting to outweigh the pros.

Recent research shows that teenagers have doubled the amount of time they spend on homework since the 1990s. This is in spite of other, well-documented research that calls the efficacy of homework into question, albeit in the younger grades. Why are students spending so much time on homework if the impact is zero (for younger kids) or moderate (for older ones)? Should we ban homework? These are the questions teachers, parents, and lawmakers are asking.

Bans proposed and implemented in the U.S. and abroad

The struggle of whether or not to assign homework is not a new one. In 2017, a Florida superintendent banned homework for elementary schools in the entire district, with one very important exception: reading at home. The United States isn’t the only country to question the benefits of homework. Last August, the Philippines proposed a bill to ban homework completely, citing the need for rest, relaxation, and time with family. Another bill there proposed no weekend homework, with teachers running the risk of fines or two years in prison. (Yikes!) While a prison sentence may seem extreme, there are real reasons to reconsider homework.

Refocus on mental health and educate the “whole child”

Prioritizing mental health is at the forefront of the homework ban movement. Leaders say they want to give students time to develop other hobbies, relationships, and balance in their lives.

This month two Utah elementary schools gained national recognition for officially banning homework. The results are significant, with psychologist referrals for anxiety decreasing by 50 percent. Many schools are looking for ways to refocus on wellness, and homework can be a real cause of stress.

[contextly_auto_sidebar]

Research supports a ban for elementary schools

Supporters of a homework ban often cite research from John Hattie, who concluded that elementary school homework has no effect on academic progress. In a podcast he said, “Homework in primary school has an effect of around zero. In high school it’s larger. (…) Which is why we need to get it right. Not why we need to get rid of it. It’s one of those lower hanging fruit that we should be looking in our primary schools to say, ‘Is it really making a difference?'”

In the upper grades, Hattie’s research shows that homework has to be purposeful, not busy work. And the reality is, most teachers don’t receive training on how to assign homework that is meaningful and relevant to students.

Parents push back, too

In October this Washington Post article made waves in parenting and education communities when it introduced the idea that, even if homework is assigned, it doesn’t have to be completed for the student to pass the class. The writer explains how her family doesn’t believe in homework, and doesn’t participate. In response, other parents started “opting out” of homework, citing research that homework in elementary school doesn’t further intelligence or academic success.

Of course, homework has its defenders, especially in the upper grades

“I think some homework is a good idea,” says Darla E. in our WeAreTeachers HELPLINE group on Facebook. “Ideally, it forces the parents to take some responsibility for their child’s education. It also reinforces what students learn and instills good study habits for later in life.”

Jennifer M. agrees. “If we are trying to make students college-ready, they need the skill of doing homework.”

And the research does support some homework in middle and high school, as long as it is clearly tied to learning and not overwhelming.

We’d love to hear your thoughts—do you think schools should ban homework? Come and share in our WeAreTeachers HELPLINE group on Facebook.

Plus, why you should stop assigning reading homework.

Schools Are Facing a Teen Sleep Epidemic

And late start times alone won't solve the issue. Continue Reading

Program: Short & Curly

Should we ban homework?

X (formerly Twitter)

It's one of the most requested topics ever – homework! Nobody loves doing it, but is it something we should do or not? Molly and Carl find out whether teachers should be allowed to give you work to do outside of school time.

Brain Trust — Casuarina Street Primary School, Katherine: Bruno, Leilani, Eloise Lawson, Lexi, Kodah

Matt Beard, Presenter
Molly Daniels, Presenter
Carl Smith, Presenter
Kyla Slaven, Supervising Producer
Justine Kelly, Executive Producer

Classroom Resources: teachers, explore the diverse themes and subjects covered

Discover more podcasts

Download the ABC listen app to hear more of your favourite podcasts

Are You Down With or Done With Homework?

Posted January 17, 2012
By Lory Hough

The debate over how much schoolwork students should be doing at home has flared again, with one side saying it's too much, the other side saying in our competitive world, it's just not enough.

It was a move that doesn't happen very often in American public schools: The principal got rid of homework.

This past September, Stephanie Brant, principal of Gaithersburg Elementary School in Gaithersburg, Md., decided that instead of teachers sending kids home with math worksheets and spelling flash cards, students would instead go home and read. Every day for 30 minutes, more if they had time or the inclination, with parents or on their own.

"I knew this would be a big shift for my community," she says. But she also strongly believed it was a necessary one. Twenty-first-century learners, especially those in elementary school, need to think critically and understand their own learning — not spend night after night doing rote homework drills.

Brant's move may not be common, but she isn't alone in her questioning. The value of doing schoolwork at home has gone in and out of fashion in the United States among educators, policymakers, the media, and, more recently, parents. As far back as the late 1800s, with the rise of the Progressive Era, doctors such as Joseph Mayer Rice began pushing for a limit on what he called "mechanical homework," saying it caused childhood nervous conditions and eyestrain. Around that time, the then-influential Ladies Home Journal began publishing a series of anti-homework articles, stating that five hours of brain work a day was "the most we should ask of our children," and that homework was an intrusion on family life. In response, states like California passed laws abolishing homework for students under a certain age.

But, as is often the case with education, the tide eventually turned. After the Russians launched the Sputnik satellite in 1957, a space race emerged, and, writes Brian Gill in the journal Theory Into Practice, "The homework problem was reconceived as part of a national crisis; the U.S. was losing the Cold War because Russian children were smarter." Many earlier laws limiting homework were abolished, and the longterm trend toward less homework came to an end.

The debate re-emerged a decade later when parents of the late '60s and '70s argued that children should be free to play and explore — similar anti-homework wellness arguments echoed nearly a century earlier. By the early-1980s, however, the pendulum swung again with the publication of A Nation at Risk , which blamed poor education for a "rising tide of mediocrity." Students needed to work harder, the report said, and one way to do this was more homework.

For the most part, this pro-homework sentiment is still going strong today, in part because of mandatory testing and continued economic concerns about the nation's competitiveness. Many believe that today's students are falling behind their peers in places like Korea and Finland and are paying more attention to Angry Birds than to ancient Babylonia.

But there are also a growing number of Stephanie Brants out there, educators and parents who believe that students are stressed and missing out on valuable family time. Students, they say, particularly younger students who have seen a rise in the amount of take-home work and already put in a six- to nine-hour "work" day, need less, not more homework.

Who is right? Are students not working hard enough or is homework not working for them? Here's where the story gets a little tricky: It depends on whom you ask and what research you're looking at. As Cathy Vatterott, the author of Rethinking Homework , points out, "Homework has generated enough research so that a study can be found to support almost any position, as long as conflicting studies are ignored." Alfie Kohn, author of The Homework Myth and a strong believer in eliminating all homework, writes that, "The fact that there isn't anything close to unanimity among experts belies the widespread assumption that homework helps." At best, he says, homework shows only an association, not a causal relationship, with academic achievement. In other words, it's hard to tease out how homework is really affecting test scores and grades. Did one teacher give better homework than another? Was one teacher more effective in the classroom? Do certain students test better or just try harder?

"It is difficult to separate where the effect of classroom teaching ends," Vatterott writes, "and the effect of homework begins."

Putting research aside, however, much of the current debate over homework is focused less on how homework affects academic achievement and more on time. Parents in particular have been saying that the amount of time children spend in school, especially with afterschool programs, combined with the amount of homework given — as early as kindergarten — is leaving students with little time to run around, eat dinner with their families, or even get enough sleep.

Certainly, for some parents, homework is a way to stay connected to their children's learning. But for others, homework creates a tug-of-war between parents and children, says Liz Goodenough, M.A.T.'71, creator of a documentary called Where Do the Children Play?

"Ideally homework should be about taking something home, spending a few curious and interesting moments in which children might engage with parents, and then getting that project back to school — an organizational triumph," she says. "A nag-free activity could engage family time: Ask a parent about his or her own childhood. Interview siblings."

Instead, as the authors of The Case Against Homework write, "Homework overload is turning many of us into the types of parents we never wanted to be: nags, bribers, and taskmasters."

Leslie Butchko saw it happen a few years ago when her son started sixth grade in the Santa Monica-Malibu (Calif.) United School District. She remembers him getting two to four hours of homework a night, plus weekend and vacation projects. He was overwhelmed and struggled to finish assignments, especially on nights when he also had an extracurricular activity.

"Ultimately, we felt compelled to have Bobby quit karate — he's a black belt — to allow more time for homework," she says. And then, with all of their attention focused on Bobby's homework, she and her husband started sending their youngest to his room so that Bobby could focus. "One day, my younger son gave us 15-minute coupons as a present for us to use to send him to play in the back room. … It was then that we realized there had to be something wrong with the amount of homework we were facing."

Butchko joined forces with another mother who was having similar struggles and ultimately helped get the homework policy in her district changed, limiting homework on weekends and holidays, setting time guidelines for daily homework, and broadening the definition of homework to include projects and studying for tests. As she told the school board at one meeting when the policy was first being discussed, "In closing, I just want to say that I had more free time at Harvard Law School than my son has in middle school, and that is not in the best interests of our children."

One barrier that Butchko had to overcome initially was convincing many teachers and parents that more homework doesn't necessarily equal rigor.

"Most of the parents that were against the homework policy felt that students need a large quantity of homework to prepare them for the rigorous AP classes in high school and to get them into Harvard," she says.

Stephanie Conklin, Ed.M.'06, sees this at Another Course to College, the Boston pilot school where she teaches math. "When a student is not completing [his or her] homework, parents usually are frustrated by this and agree with me that homework is an important part of their child's learning," she says.

As Timothy Jarman, Ed.M.'10, a ninth-grade English teacher at Eugene Ashley High School in Wilmington, N.C., says, "Parents think it is strange when their children are not assigned a substantial amount of homework."

That's because, writes Vatterott, in her chapter, "The Cult(ure) of Homework," the concept of homework "has become so engrained in U.S. culture that the word homework is part of the common vernacular."

These days, nightly homework is a given in American schools, writes Kohn.

"Homework isn't limited to those occasions when it seems appropriate and important. Most teachers and administrators aren't saying, 'It may be useful to do this particular project at home,'" he writes. "Rather, the point of departure seems to be, 'We've decided ahead of time that children will have to do something every night (or several times a week). … This commitment to the idea of homework in the abstract is accepted by the overwhelming majority of schools — public and private, elementary and secondary."

Brant had to confront this when she cut homework at Gaithersburg Elementary.

"A lot of my parents have this idea that homework is part of life. This is what I had to do when I was young," she says, and so, too, will our kids. "So I had to shift their thinking." She did this slowly, first by asking her teachers last year to really think about what they were sending home. And this year, in addition to forming a parent advisory group around the issue, she also holds events to answer questions.

Still, not everyone is convinced that homework as a given is a bad thing. "Any pursuit of excellence, be it in sports, the arts, or academics, requires hard work. That our culture finds it okay for kids to spend hours a day in a sport but not equal time on academics is part of the problem," wrote one pro-homework parent on the blog for the documentary Race to Nowhere , which looks at the stress American students are under. "Homework has always been an issue for parents and children. It is now and it was 20 years ago. I think when people decide to have children that it is their responsibility to educate them," wrote another.

And part of educating them, some believe, is helping them develop skills they will eventually need in adulthood. "Homework can help students develop study skills that will be of value even after they leave school," reads a publication on the U.S. Department of Education website called Homework Tips for Parents. "It can teach them that learning takes place anywhere, not just in the classroom. … It can foster positive character traits such as independence and responsibility. Homework can teach children how to manage time."

Annie Brown, Ed.M.'01, feels this is particularly critical at less affluent schools like the ones she has worked at in Boston, Cambridge, Mass., and Los Angeles as a literacy coach.

"It feels important that my students do homework because they will ultimately be competing for college placement and jobs with students who have done homework and have developed a work ethic," she says. "Also it will get them ready for independently taking responsibility for their learning, which will need to happen for them to go to college."

The problem with this thinking, writes Vatterott, is that homework becomes a way to practice being a worker.

"Which begs the question," she writes. "Is our job as educators to produce learners or workers?"

Slate magazine editor Emily Bazelon, in a piece about homework, says this makes no sense for younger kids.

"Why should we think that practicing homework in first grade will make you better at doing it in middle school?" she writes. "Doesn't the opposite seem equally plausible: that it's counterproductive to ask children to sit down and work at night before they're developmentally ready because you'll just make them tired and cross?"

Kohn writes in the American School Board Journal that this "premature exposure" to practices like homework (and sit-and-listen lessons and tests) "are clearly a bad match for younger children and of questionable value at any age." He calls it BGUTI: Better Get Used to It. "The logic here is that we have to prepare you for the bad things that are going to be done to you later … by doing them to you now."

According to a recent University of Michigan study, daily homework for six- to eight-year-olds increased on average from about 8 minutes in 1981 to 22 minutes in 2003. A review of research by Duke University Professor Harris Cooper found that for elementary school students, "the average correlation between time spent on homework and achievement … hovered around zero."

So should homework be eliminated? Of course not, say many Ed School graduates who are teaching. Not only would students not have time for essays and long projects, but also teachers would not be able to get all students to grade level or to cover critical material, says Brett Pangburn, Ed.M.'06, a sixth-grade English teacher at Excel Academy Charter School in Boston. Still, he says, homework has to be relevant.

"Kids need to practice the skills being taught in class, especially where, like the kids I teach at Excel, they are behind and need to catch up," he says. "Our results at Excel have demonstrated that kids can catch up and view themselves as in control of their academic futures, but this requires hard work, and homework is a part of it."

Ed School Professor Howard Gardner basically agrees.

"America and Americans lurch between too little homework in many of our schools to an excess of homework in our most competitive environments — Li'l Abner vs. Tiger Mother," he says. "Neither approach makes sense. Homework should build on what happens in class, consolidating skills and helping students to answer new questions."

So how can schools come to a happy medium, a way that allows teachers to cover everything they need while not overwhelming students? Conklin says she often gives online math assignments that act as labs and students have two or three days to complete them, including some in-class time. Students at Pangburn's school have a 50-minute silent period during regular school hours where homework can be started, and where teachers pull individual or small groups of students aside for tutoring, often on that night's homework. Afterschool homework clubs can help.

Some schools and districts have adapted time limits rather than nix homework completely, with the 10-minute per grade rule being the standard — 10 minutes a night for first-graders, 30 minutes for third-graders, and so on. (This remedy, however, is often met with mixed results since not all students work at the same pace.) Other schools offer an extended day that allows teachers to cover more material in school, in turn requiring fewer take-home assignments. And for others, like Stephanie Brant's elementary school in Maryland, more reading with a few targeted project assignments has been the answer.

"The routine of reading is so much more important than the routine of homework," she says. "Let's have kids reflect. You can still have the routine and you can still have your workspace, but now it's for reading. I often say to parents, if we can put a man on the moon, we can put a man or woman on Mars and that person is now a second-grader. We don't know what skills that person will need. At the end of the day, we have to feel confident that we're giving them something they can use on Mars."

Read a January 2014 update.

Homework Policy Still Going Strong

Ed. Magazine

The magazine of the Harvard Graduate School of Education

Commencement Marshal Sarah Fiarman: The Principal of the Matter

Making Math “Almost Fun”

Alum develops curriculum to entice reluctant math learners

Lessons Learned: Zid Mancenido, Ph.D.'22

Why I Think All Schools Should Abolish Homework

Two brothers work on laptop computers at home

H ow long is your child’s workweek? Thirty hours? Forty? Would it surprise you to learn that some elementary school kids have workweeks comparable to adults’ schedules? For most children, mandatory homework assignments push their workweek far beyond the school day and deep into what any other laborers would consider overtime. Even without sports or music or other school-sponsored extracurriculars, the daily homework slog keeps many students on the clock as long as lawyers, teachers, medical residents, truck drivers and other overworked adults. Is it any wonder that,deprived of the labor protections that we provide adults, our kids are suffering an epidemic of disengagement, anxiety and depression ?

With my youngest child just months away from finishing high school, I’m remembering all the needless misery and missed opportunities all three of my kids suffered because of their endless assignments. When my daughters were in middle school, I would urge them into bed before midnight and then find them clandestinely studying under the covers with a flashlight. We cut back on their activities but still found ourselves stuck in a system on overdrive, returning home from hectic days at 6 p.m. only to face hours more of homework. Now, even as a senior with a moderate course load, my son, Zak, has spent many weekends studying, finding little time for the exercise and fresh air essential to his well-being. Week after week, and without any extracurriculars, Zak logs a lot more than the 40 hours adults traditionally work each week — and with no recognition from his “bosses” that it’s too much. I can’t count the number of shared evenings, weekend outings and dinners that our family has missed and will never get back.

How much after-school time should our schools really own?

In the midst of the madness last fall, Zak said to me, “I feel like I’m working towards my death. The constant demands on my time since 5th grade are just going to continue through graduation, into college, and then into my job. It’s like I’m on an endless treadmill with no time for living.”

My spirit crumbled along with his.

Like Zak, many people are now questioning the point of putting so much demand on children and teens that they become thinly stretched and overworked. Studies have long shown that there is no academic benefit to high school homework that consumes more than a modest number of hours each week. In a study of high schoolers conducted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), researchers concluded that “after around four hours of homework per week, the additional time invested in homework has a negligible impact on performance.”

In elementary school, where we often assign overtime even to the youngest children, studies have shown there’s no academic benefit to any amount of homework at all.

Our unquestioned acceptance of homework also flies in the face of all we know about human health, brain function and learning. Brain scientists know that rest and exercise are essential to good health and real learning . Even top adult professionals in specialized fields take care to limit their work to concentrated periods of focus. A landmark study of how humans develop expertise found that elite musicians, scientists and athletes do their most productive work only about four hours per day .

Yet we continue to overwork our children, depriving them of the chance to cultivate health and learn deeply, burdening them with an imbalance of sedentary, academic tasks. American high school students , in fact, do more homework each week than their peers in the average country in the OECD, a 2014 report found.

It’s time for an uprising.

Already, small rebellions are starting. High schools in Ridgewood, N.J. , and Fairfax County, Va., among others, have banned homework over school breaks. The entire second grade at Taylor Elementary School in Arlington, Va., abolished homework this academic year. Burton Valley Elementary School in Lafayette, Calif., has eliminated homework in grades K through 4. Henry West Laboratory School , a public K-8 school in Coral Gables, Fla., eliminated mandatory, graded homework for optional assignments. One Lexington, Mass., elementary school is piloting a homework-free year, replacing it with reading for pleasure.

More from TIME

Across the Atlantic, students in Spain launched a national strike against excessive assignments in November. And a second-grade teacher in Texas, made headlines this fall when she quit sending home extra work , instead urging families to “spend your evenings doing things that are proven to correlate with student success. Eat dinner as a family, read together, play outside and get your child to bed early.”

It is time that we call loudly for a clear and simple change: a workweek limit for children, counting time on the clock before and after the final bell. Why should schools extend their authority far beyond the boundaries of campus, dictating activities in our homes in the hours that belong to families? An all-out ban on after-school assignments would be optimal. Short of that, we can at least sensibly agree on a cap limiting kids to a 40-hour workweek — and fewer hours for younger children.

Resistance even to this reasonable limit will be rife. Mike Miller, an English teacher at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Alexandria, Va., found this out firsthand when he spearheaded a homework committee to rethink the usual approach. He had read the education research and found a forgotten policy on the county books limiting homework to two hours a night, total, including all classes. “I thought it would be a slam dunk” to put the two-hour cap firmly in place, Miller said.

But immediately, people started balking. “There was a lot of fear in the community,” Miller said. “It’s like jumping off a high dive with your kids’ future. If we reduce homework to two hours or less, is my kid really going to be okay?” In the end, the committee only agreed to a homework ban over school breaks.

Miller’s response is a great model for us all. He decided to limit assignments in his own class to 20 minutes a night (the most allowed for a student with six classes to hit the two-hour max). His students didn’t suddenly fail. Their test scores remained stable. And they started using their more breathable schedule to do more creative, thoughtful work.

That’s the way we will get to a sane work schedule for kids: by simultaneously pursuing changes big and small. Even as we collaboratively press for policy changes at the district or individual school level, all teachers can act now, as individuals, to ease the strain on overworked kids.

As parents and students, we can also organize to make homework the exception rather than the rule. We can insist that every family, teacher and student be allowed to opt out of assignments without penalty to make room for important activities, and we can seek changes that shift practice exercises and assignments into the actual school day.

We’ll know our work is done only when Zak and every other child can clock out, eat dinner, sleep well and stay healthy — the very things needed to engage and learn deeply. That’s the basic standard the law applies to working adults. Let’s do the same for our kids.

Vicki Abeles is the author of the bestseller Beyond Measure: Rescuing an Overscheduled, Overtested, Underestimated Generation, and director and producer of the documentaries “ Race to Nowhere ” and “ Beyond Measure. ”

More Must-Reads From TIME

Biden’s Campaign Is In Trouble. Will the Turnaround Plan Work?
Why We're Spending So Much Money Now
The Financial Influencers Women Actually Want to Listen To
Breaker Sunny Choi Is Heading to Paris
The UAE Is on a Mission to Become an AI Power
Why TV Can’t Stop Making Silly Shows About Lady Journalists
The Case for Wearing Shoes in the House
Want Weekly Recs on What to Watch, Read, and More? Sign Up for Worth Your Time

No More Homework: 12 Reasons We Should Get Rid of It Completely

Last Updated: February 16, 2024 Fact Checked

This article was co-authored by wikiHow staff writer, Finn Kobler . Finn Kobler graduated from USC in 2022 with a BFA in Writing for Screen/Television. He is a two-time California State Champion and record holder in Original Prose/Poetry, a 2018 finalist for the Los Angeles Youth Poet Laureate, and he's written micro-budget films that have been screened in over 150 theaters nationwide. Growing up, Finn spent every summer helping his family's nonprofit arts program, Showdown Stage Company, empower people through accessible media. He hopes to continue that mission with his writing at wikiHow. There are 12 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 115,884 times. Learn more...

The amount of homework students are given has increased dramatically in the 21st century, which has sparked countless debates over homework’s overall value. While some have been adamant that homework is an essential part of a good education, it’s been proven that too much homework negatively affects students’ mood, classroom performance, and overall well-being. In addition, a heavy homework load can stress families and teachers. Here are 12 reasons why homework should be banned (or at least heavily reduced).

School is already a full-time job.

Students already spend approximately seven hours a day at school.

For years, teachers have followed the “10-minute rule” giving students roughly 10 minutes of homework per grade level. However, recent studies have shown students are completing 3+ hours of homework a night well before their senior years even begin. [2] X Trustworthy Source American Psychological Association Leading scientific and professional organization of licensed psychologists Go to source

Homework negatively affects students’ health.

Homework interferes with student’s opportunities to socialize.

Childhood and adolescence are extraordinary times for making friends.

Homework hinders students’ chances to learn new things.

Homework lowers students’ enthusiasm for school.

Homework makes the school feel like a chore.

Homework can lower academic performance.

Homework is unnecessary and counterproductive for high-performing students.

Homework cuts into family time.

Too much homework can cause family structures to collapse.

Homework is stressful for teachers.

Homework can also lead to burnout for teachers.

Homework is often irrelevant and punitive.

Students who don’t understand the lesson get no value from homework.

There are even studies that have shown homework in primary school has no correlation with classroom performance whatsoever. [9] X Research source

Homework encourages cheating.

Mandatory homework makes cheating feel like students’ only option.

Homework is inequitable.

Homework highlights the achievement gap between rich and poor students.

Other countries have banned homework with great results.

Countries like Finland have minimal homework and perform well academically.

There are even some U.S. schools that have adopted this approach with success. [13] X Research source

Community Q&A

↑ https://www.edutopia.org/no-proven-benefits
↑ https://www.apa.org/monitor/2016/03/homework
↑ https://healthier.stanfordchildrens.org/en/health-hazards-homework/
↑ https://teensneedsleep.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/galloway-nonacademic-effects-of-homework-in-privileged-high-performing-high-schools.pdf
↑ https://time.com/4466390/homework-debate-research/
↑ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220485.2022.2075506?role=tab&scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=vece20
↑ https://kappanonline.org/teacher-stress-balancing-demands-resources-mccarthy/
↑ https://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/ct-life-homework-pros-cons-20180807-story.html
↑ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294446/
↑ https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/homework-inequality-parents-schedules-grades/485174/
↑ https://www.bbc.com/news/education-37716005
↑ https://www.wsj.com/articles/no-homework-its-the-new-thing-in-u-s-schools-11544610600

About This Article

Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Did this article help you?

Featured Articles

Watch Articles

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Do Not Sell or Share My Info
Not Selling Info

Get all the best how-tos!

Temperature Check
The Stardust Inquests
Inside The Newsroom
Climate Crisis
International

'Why I believe homework should be banned', by one primary school student

As the discussion around state exams through the Covid-19 shutdown continues, a separate debate about the very need for homework itself rumbles on. Over the years, many have argued that homework for students in busy modern-day family structures is no longer workable.

This year, the Green Party sought to open a discussion about the banning of homework in future. Here, primary school pupil Misha McEnaney, a fifth class student from Dublin, outlines why he believes homework is more of a hindrance than a help.

IRISH CHILDREN SPEND around 274.5 hours on homework in a year. Is it a waste of time? Generally speaking, homework does not improve academic performance among children, although it may improve academic skills among older students especially lower-achieving kids. Homework also creates stress among students who could be doing other things.

I think it is a waste of time. Here’s why I think so.

Many students think homework is extremely boring and hard so it increases our stress levels. You might fight with your family or friends and that gives the impression you are angry and irritated when often it’s just because your homework is increasing your stress.

Also, a study by scholar Denise Pope at Stanford shows that out of 4,300 students at high-performance schools, 60% stated that their homework was their primary source of stress.

Movement is more important

I believe that homework eliminates time when you could be exercising, playing sports, carrying out hobbies, reading etc. So when your friends are playing outside or something exciting or important is happening you can’t go out because you’re stuck inside doing your homework.

Homework messes up your sleep cycles and it causes you to be more tired. After school when you’re tired from working you still have to do your homework, so you don’t deliver your full concentration and that makes your performance not as acceptable as it should be. This can cause your grade to go down and so that defeats the whole point of education to become better and smarter.

A study from teenink.com shows that students perform best in school when they receive 10–12 hours of sleep each night, while only 15% of teenagers in America reported themselves sleeping eight hours or more on school nights, according to the national sleep foundation of America. Sleep disruption is very bad for our health.

Teacher trust

If you’re completely booked up for the day doing sports or other activities you have no time to do your homework. Your teachers start to trust you less and less and this develops a bad view of you when it’s not entirely your fault.

It’s also repetitive so you’re doing the same work at school and there’s no effectiveness, it’s not going in. So all that homework becomes a waste because you have already completed it at school. You can also easily get distracted.

Homework takes away revision time for tests and that can affect the test scores. That develops a bad reputation for the student and for the school. The parents then assume that the teaching at the school is bad and they might move school. So the kid might lose friends and over time the school becomes less liked and popular.

All because there is too much homework.

Bad for the mood

If you don’t sleep enough it can cause mood swings which can affect students’ performance and relationships. To think we can stop all of this by just banning homework makes me wonder why schools still give out homework at all.

People who believe that homework should not be banned have reasonable points and arguments. They believe that doing homework at home can be better for the students and they would receive higher results.

They also think the parents of the students will have an idea of what type of work they are doing in the classroom, at what scale the student is doing their work and how the student is doing that work. There is absolutely no reason why parents shouldn’t know what the student’s work is like.

Some people believe that homework boosts interaction between a student and his or her teacher. Homework might develop their presentation skills. They believe that homework is “a remedy against weaknesses”. These can all be done at school. They believe it teaches the students responsibility because they have to make sure that they do their work and not lose it or destroy it.

They think the students learn much more new information as well as in school. So people think it teaches the students important life skills. They also think it keeps the students busy and entertained. I would argue that these should all be the responsibility of parents, not school.

A shift in the debate

The Green Party in Ireland has promised to explore the banning of homework for primary school children. They also vow to review primary and secondary schools curriculum “to meet the needs of the 21st century”. Catherine Martin, deputy leader of the Green Party, said that “the phasing out of homework is something that definitely should be explored”.

“This isn’t new, this has been on our policy for the past several years. And I think we really need to have a conversation on how best to develop the creative juices of our children, or really change how we do homework, homework could be, ‘go home and draw a picture of something that means a lot to you’,” she said.

“They’re so young, especially up to the age of seven or eight, it’s a conversation that we need to have”.

She used the example of Loreto Primary School in Rathfarnham, Dublin, which is currently trialling a “no-homework” programme for all classes except sixth. Ms Martin said that they had found the pilot scheme “amazing” and children were spending a lot more time with their families as a result.

Mental health considerations

Psychotherapist Mary McHugh believes that we are reducing children’s natural “curious, imaginative and creative” tendencies by “pressuring them to conform”.

“Our children from the age of three, are being trained to sit still and from five upwards, it’s expected that this is the norm.” McHugh also says that “stress is showing up at an alarming scale and we’re still applying more pressure academically younger and younger”.

Let’s look at Finland. In Finland, there is no homework in all schools. Finland agrees that there should be no homework because it increases stress, it wastes time etc. Finnish students regularly top the charts on global education metric systems.

Some 93% of Finnish students graduate from secondary school compared to 75% in the USA and 78% in Canada. About two in every three students in Finland go to college which is the highest rate in Europe. The students’ test scores dominate everyone else. These are the scores for the PISA test (Program for International Student Assessment) 2006. There are other reasons why Finland’s education system is so good but no homework is definitely an important one.

Homework increases stress levels among students. It replaces time for hobbies and sports. It messes up your sleep. It can’t always be done and that causes trouble. It’s repetitive. You can develop health problems from lack of sleep.

It takes away time for studying and also when you don’t get enough sleep you can get mood swings and that can affect performance and relationships. There are reasonable arguments for why people who believe that homework shouldn’t be banned are wrong.

We have seen that the Green Party also thinks that homework should be banned and that some schools have already trialled it. We have looked at Finland banning homework and we have seen the impact it has made compared to other countries. This is why I think homework should be banned, not just in my school but in all schools.

Misha McEnaney is a fifth class student at St Mary’s College, Rathmines, Dublin.

Making a difference

A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation..

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can make sure we can keep reliable, meaningful news open to everyone regardless of their ability to pay.

To embed this post, copy the code below on your site

600px wide <iframe width="600" height="460" frameborder="0" style="border:0px;" src="https://www.thejournal.ie/https://www.thejournal.ie/readme/homework-5086000-May2020/?embedpost=5086000&width=600&height=460" ></iframe>

400px wide <iframe width="600" height="460" frameborder="0" style="border:0px;" src="https://www.thejournal.ie/https://www.thejournal.ie/readme/homework-5086000-May2020/?embedpost=5086000&width=400&height=460" ></iframe>

300px wide <iframe width="600" height="460" frameborder="0" style="border:0px;" src="https://www.thejournal.ie/https://www.thejournal.ie/readme/homework-5086000-May2020/?embedpost=5086000&width=300&height=460" ></iframe>

Create an email alert based on the current article

Should homework be banned‪?‬ Audrey

Society & Culture
DEC 9, 2019

Book Project 2

A book project for school

NOV 7, 2019

Should homework be banned?

NOV 6, 2019

Book Review of "The Journal Of Wong Ming-Chnug

This is a book review .

Top Podcasts In Society & Culture

21 Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned

The homework debate has strong arguments on both sides. Commonly-cited reasons why homework should be banned include the idea that it is often counterproductive, stifles students’ creativity, and limits their freedom outside the classroom.

Students already have up to 7 hours of schoolwork to complete 5 days a week; adding more contributes to increased anxiety, burnout, and overall poor performance.

But arguments for homework include the fact it does increase student grades (Cooper, Robinson & Patall, 2006), it instils discipline, and it helps to reinforce what was learned into long-term memory.

The following are common arguments for banning homework – note that this is an article written to stimulate debate points on the topic, so it only presents one perspective. For the other side of the argument, it’s worth checking out my article on the 27 pros and cons of homework .

Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned

1. it contributes to increased anxiety.

If there’s one word that describes middle-school and high-school students, it’s anxiety. In my homework statistics article , I cite research showing that 74% of students cite homework as a source of stress.

They have so much to juggle, from the novelty of adolescence to the realization that they must soon start preparing for college and their life after (Pressman et al., 2015).

It’s a lot to manage, and adding homework that reduces their free time and makes them even more restricted is downright harmful. The natural outcome of this dogpile of pressure is anxiety, and many students often feel overwhelmed, both by the hours and hours of coursework in a day and the extensive homework they are assigned (Galloway, Conner & Pope, 2013).

Because teachers often don’t communicate with one another over curricula, major assignments can overlap such that students have to tackle numerous large projects at once, which contributes to severe anxiety over good grades.

In response to this, some students check out of school entirely, letting their academic future go to waste. While, of course, it’s not fair to strawman and say that homework is to blame for all these cases, it may indeed by a contributing factor.

2. It Offers Less Social Time

Homework cuts out free time. Children already spend the better part of their day learning in a school environment, and when they come home, they need to socialize.

Whether it’s family or friends, a social balance is important. Depending on the coursework they’re assigned, homework can detrimentally affect students’ social life, which feed back into more of our first gripe about homework: its anxiety-inducing nature.

Furthermore, social time is extremely important for children to grow up well-balanced and confident. If a child is highly intelligent (book smart) but lacks to social skills we might call street smarts , they may struggle in adulthood.

3. It Detracts from Play Time

Play is extremely important for children’s physical, social, and cognitive development . In fact, children naturally learn through play .

So, when children get home from school, they need a few hours to play. They’re actually learning when playing! If playing with friends, they’re learning social skills; but playing alone also stimulates creative and analytical thinking skills.

Play is also a different type of learning than the learning that commonly happens at school. So, allowing children to play at home gives their brain a break from ‘school learning’ and lets them learn through active and even relaxing methods.

4. It Discourages Physical Exercise and Contributes to Obesity

Exercise is an important part of life for everyone, but especially for children. Developing a positive self-image and disciplining oneself is an important skill to learn, one that becomes much more difficult when homework is in the picture.

Homework can demand a lot of attention that kids could be spending exercising or socializing. These two important life pursuits can be left by the wayside, leaving students feeling confused, depressed, and anxious about the future.

Physical exercise should be considered a key feature of a child’s holistic development. It helps keep children healthy, can reduce anxiety, and support healthy immune systems. It also helps with physical development such as supporting fine and gross motor skills .

In fact, some scholars (Ren et al., 2017) have even identified excessive homework as a contributing factor for childhood obesity.

5. It Disrupts Sleep Patterns

Everyone knows the trope of a college student staying up late to finish their homework or cram for a test.

While it would be unfair to credit homework exclusively for an unhealthy sleep schedule, the constant pressure to finish assignments on time often yields one of two results.

Students can either burn the midnight oil to make sure their homework is done, or they can check out of school entirely and ignore their academic interests. Neither is an acceptable way to live.

This point is particularly pertinent to teenagers. They are not lazy; teens need 12-13 hours of sleep every day because their bodies are changing so dramatically.

To pile additional homework on them that interferes with the circadian rhythm is not just unhelpful—it may be downright harmful (Yeo et al., 2020).

6. It Involves Less Guidance

If there’s one thing that’s beneficial about the in-person learning experience, it’s the ability to raise one’s hand and let the teacher know when something is unclear or difficult to understand.

That handheld process isn’t available for homework; in fact, homework matters little in the grand scheme of learning. It’s just busywork that’s supposed to help students consolidate their knowledge.

In reality, homework becomes something that students resent and can fill them with feelings of frustration—something that would be much more readily addressed if the same content was covered in-person with a teacher to guide the student through the assignment.

7. It’s Regularly Rote Learning

In most subjects, homework isn’t reflective of the skills students need to learn to thrive in the workforce. Instead, it often simply involves rote learning (repetition of tasks) that is not seen as the best way to learn.

A main goal of education is to train up vocational professionals with defined skills. But more often than not, homework winds up as a bland set of word problems that have no basis in the real world.

Walking through real-world examples under the guidance of a teacher is much more beneficial to student learning.

8. It Can Detract from a Love of Learning

If you know what it’s like to doze off during a boring class or meeting, then you can relate to the difficulty students have paying attention in class.

That motivation starts to dwindle when students must complete assignments on their own time, often under immense pressure.

It’s not a healthy way to inspire kids to learn about different subjects and develop a love of learning.

Students already need to sit through hours and hours of class on end in-person. This learning time should be used more effectively to eliminate the need for home.

When children finally get out of class at the end of the day, they need to socialize and exercise, not spend even longer staring at a book to complete a bunch of unhelpful practice questions.

9. It Convolutes the Subject

Another important consideration about homework is that it can often be counterproductive.

That’s because teachers don’t always use the full curriculum material for their teaching, and they may choose to develop their own homework rather than to use the resources offered by the curriculum provider.

This homework can often be off-subject, extremely niche, or unhelpful in explaining a subject that students are studying.

Students who don’t understand a subject and don’t have resources to rely on will eventually give up. That risk becomes even more prevalent when you factor in the scope, complexity, and type of assignment.

Students need to be taught in a safe environment where they can feel free to ask questions and learn at their own pace. Of course, there’s no fairytale way to perfect this ideal, but what is clear is that homework is not beneficial to the learning environment for many students.

10. It’s Not What Kids Want

Lastly, homework should be banned because it’s generally not what students want. From elementary to college level, most students harbor some sort of resentment towards homework.

It might be easy to dismiss this to say that the students “aren’t living in the real world.” The truth of the matter is that the real world is a lot more nuanced, creative, and diverse than the repetitive, broad, and often stagnant homework.

It’s easy to understand why most students wish that more time in school had been spent on learning how to live rather than trying to figure out how many apples Johnny had. Subjects like car maintenance, entrepreneurship, computer skills, socialization, networking, tax filing, finances, and survival are touched on at best and ignored at worst.

It’s not enough for students to be able to regurgitate information on a piece of paper; in the end, the education system should teach them how to be self-sufficient, something that might be much easier to do if resources were divested from homework and poured into more beneficial subject material.

Consider these 11 Additional Reasons

Decreases time with parents – Homework may prevent parents and children from spending quality time together.
Hidden costs – Families often feel pressure to purchase internet and other resources to help their children to complete their homework.
Is inequitable – some children have parents to help them while others don’t. Similarly, some children have internet access to help while others don’t (see: Kralovec & Buell, 2001).
Easy to cheat – Unsupervised homework time makes it easy for children to simply cheat on their work so they can get on with play time!
Lack of downtime – Children need time where they aren’t doing anything. Time that is unstructured helps them to develop hobbies and interests .
Detracts from reading – Children could be spending their time reading books and developing their imaginations rather than working on repetitive homework tasks.
Take up parental time – Parents, who have just spent all day working, are increasingly expected to spend their time doing ‘teaching’ with their children at home.
Discourages club membership – If children are too busy with homework, they may not be able to join clubs and sporting groups that can help them make friends and develop extracurricular skills.
Makes it hard for college students to make a living – In college, where homework is extensive, students often can’t juggle homework with their weekend and night-time jobs. As a result, it pushes them further into student poverty.
Contributes to poor work-life culture – From early ages, we’re sending a message to children that they should take their work home with them. This can spill over into the workplace, where they’ll be expected to continue working for their company even after the workday ends.
Can reinforce faulty learning – When children learn in isolation during homework time, they may end up practicing their work completely wrong! They need intermittent support to make sure their practice is taking them down the right path.

Students may need to demonstrate their understanding of a topic to progress; that, at least, is a reflection of the real world. What’s not helpful is when students are peppered day and night with information that they need to regurgitate on a piece of paper.

For positive outcomes to come from homework, parents and teachers need to work together. It depends a lot on the type of homework provided as well as the age of the student and the need to balance homework with time to do other things in your life.

Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of educational research , 76 (1), 1-62.

Galloway, M., Conner, J., & Pope, D. (2013). Nonacademic effects of homework in privileged, high-performing high schools. The journal of experimental education , 81 (4), 490-510. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.745469

Kralovec, E., & Buell, J. (2001). The end of homework: How homework disrupts families, overburdens children, and limits learning . Beacon Press.

Pressman, R. M., Sugarman, D. B., Nemon, M. L., Desjarlais, J., Owens, J. A., & Schettini-Evans, A. (2015). Homework and family stress: With consideration of parents’ self confidence, educational level, and cultural background. The American Journal of Family Therapy , 43 (4), 297-313. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2015.1061407

Ren, H., Zhou, Z., Liu, W., Wang, X., & Yin, Z. (2017). Excessive homework, inadequate sleep, physical inactivity and screen viewing time are major contributors to high paediatric obesity. Acta Paediatrica , 106 (1), 120-127. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13640

Yeo, S. C., Tan, J., Lo, J. C., Chee, M. W., & Gooley, J. J. (2020). Associations of time spent on homework or studying with nocturnal sleep behavior and depression symptoms in adolescents from Singapore. Sleep Health , 6 (6), 758-766. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2020.04.011

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 5 Top Tips for Succeeding at University
Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 50 Durable Goods Examples
Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 100 Consumer Goods Examples
Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 30 Globalization Pros and Cons

5 thoughts on “21 Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned”

very helpful website thanks

my topic on publics speaking is on banning homework it really helps

Very helpful cheers mate

This really helped my debate team

It is very helpful for me.

Why (Most) Homework Should Be Banned

The 30-minute rule is there to justify giving a lot of homework

Anthony Malcolm ‘23 , Staff Writer December 8, 2022

There are plenty of reasons why (most) homework should be banned. I’ll start out with some general facts and look at homework in general, then go into some detail about our school.

Stanford conducted a study surveying over 4,300 students in 10 high performing high schools in California. More than 70% of the students said they were “often or always stressed over schoolwork,” with 56% claiming that homework was the main stressor. But here’s the kicker: Less than 1% said homework was not a stressor.

The researchers then asked the students if they had exhibited symptoms of stress like headaches, exhaustion, sleep deprivation, weight loss, and stomach problems. More than 80% of the students reported at least one stress related symptom recently and 44% claimed they experienced 3 or more symptoms. The study also found that students who spend a lot of time working on homework experience more stress, physical health problems, and a lack of balance in their lives. The study claimed that any more than 2 hours of homework per night was counterproductive, and that the students who spent too much time on homework were more likely to not participate in activities and hobbies, and stop seeing friends and family.

A smaller NYU study claimed that students at elite high schools are susceptible to chronic stress, emotional exhaustion, and alcohol and drug abuse. About half of the students said they received at least 3 hours of homework a night on top of being pressured to take college level classes and participate in extracurricular activities (sound familiar?). The study claims that many of the students felt they were being worked as hard as adults, and they said that their workload seemed inappropriate for their development level. The study reported that the students felt that they had little time for relaxing and hobbies. More than two thirds of students said they used alcohol or drugs, primarily marijuana, to cope with the stress.

Back to the Stanford study for a second; many of the students claimed that the homework was “pointless” or “mindless.” The study argues that homework should have a purpose and benefit, which should be to cultivate learning. One of the main reasons is that school feels like a full-time job at this point. We, as in BC High students, are in school from 8:25 till 2:40; most of us have some sort of extracurricular activity on top of that, and most of us have significant commutes, which means we are getting home much later. On top of a rigorous day at school, an afterschool activity, and a commute, we have to deal with a varying amount of homework every night. Sometimes it is 2 hours, sometimes 3, sometimes even 4. I will give you an example of a day in my life last year to provide a specific example, because we are not a one size fits all community.

I live in Middleboro and Bridgewater, so I ride the train to school which takes 50 minutes to an hour. A spring day last year would start by waking up at 5:30 and then leaving my house to get to the train at 6:30-6:35, getting on the train at 6:50, getting off the train at 7:50, and arriving at the school before classes started at 8:20. I would go through the school day and stay after for track practice. After track, I would most likely get on the train at 5:00 and get home at 6:15. I would eat dinner, shower, and then start my homework around 7:30-8, and usually I would finish somewhere between 10:30ish to 11:30ish. Can you see how that can be misconstrued as a full-time job?

Some of you might be thinking (especially any teacher reading this), why didn’t you use the 30-minute rule? Well, because most (and I mean MOST) of the time the 30-minute rule is an ineffective rule that justifies giving students a lot of homework. If you use the 30-minute rule and don’t finish a homework assignment, it still has to be completed sometime, and you’ll be behind in class. It is only effective when a teacher plans for the 30-minute rule and tells you to stop at 30 minutes to get an idea of how long an assignment takes their students. The 30-minute rule is there to justify giving a lot of homework because if you say in class that the homework took a long time, you will probably be told about the 30-minute rule. But if you used the 30-minute rule, you would have an unfinished homework assignment which means, depending on the class, you would be lost and behind, and you would still have to do it at some point. If you should have to justify giving a lot of homework, then it is probably too much.

Parker, Clifton B. “Stanford Research Shows Pitfalls of Homework.” Stanford University , 10 Mar. 2014, http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/march/too-much-homework-031014.html .

Communications, NYU Web. NYU Study Examines Top High School Students’ Stress and Coping Mechanisms . http://www.nyu.edu/content/nyu/en/about/news-publications/news/2015/august/nyu

-study-examines-top-high-school-students-stress-and-coping-mechanisms .

Sex Scene Discourse

Why Can’t You Get into College?

Behind the Commencement Speaker Selection Process

Be Worried?

Is the House System worth it?

Why JUG will Never Change

Should Parents Check Our Phones?

Hoodies in BC High?

Toll Booths: A Rebuttal

Why Do We Chase Success?

The Eyes and Ears of BC High.

Comments (0)

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Why Homework Should not be Banned to Children?

A mother guiding her son to read his homework

Get the SBS Audio app

Other ways to listen, more and more australian schools are banning homework. and a decision to stop homework at leichhardts kegworth public school has sparked a debate among inner west sydney parents about whether the policy will help pupils in the long run. image: a mother guiding her son to read his homework (a. violata), recommended for you.

Once 'distant' from her faith, Madz says motherhood brought her back into the fold

'It's extremely painful that you're both gone': Filipino couple who died in WA remembered by their loved ones

Filipino-Australian community in Broome, WA rallying behind singer Amy Reeves in her Australian Idol quest

Some temporary visa holders are eligible for Medicare. Here's which subclasses are and the enrolment process

An international student was diagnosed with stage 3 cancer. Now, he is a fitness teacher

'Always dream big': Fil-Aussie basketball team sets sights high for 2024 NBTC tournament in Manila

Biko, but make it bush tucker

A journey of self-healing: Former teacher discovers her brand essence in self-affirmation necklaces

Latest podcast episodes.

Hybrid housing a possible solution for youth homelessness

The government will maintain the emissions reduction target at 26-28 per cent.

ACEN and Yindjibarndi people collaborate on Australia's largest Indigenous-led renewable energy initiative

SBS News in Filipino, Monday 25 March 2024

Trending Ngayon: Amy Reeves, Lenka vs Shaira, Belle Mariano

Trending Ngayon: Australian Idol's Amy Reeves, Lenka vs Shaira, Billboard PH Women in Music awards

SBS News in Filipino

Why Homework Should Be Banned? [6 Reasons]

The arguments opposing and supporting homework have always been there. Whether homework actually solves a purpose is still in research.

But homework stressing out the students to the extent of hating school and education is not a myth. With increasing competition, students are getting more and more homework every night than they used to get 5 years ago. Nowadays a sincere school student needs 2 hours of extra work after school to just keep up with the homework.

Today, we will discuss why homework should be banned and as it isn’t going to be considered soon, websites to cheat on homework is the way to go. It’s also noted that parents get anxious and develop stress if children are subjected to homework that isn’t in sync with their development level.

No one complains when a university student pulls out an all-nighter, as they have reached the level of maturity where it’s suitable. But 25-30 minutes of homework every night is enough to drive a kindergarten student insane with stress and anxiety.

Why Homework Should Be Banned?

Too much homework.

You wouldn’t find me advocating to ban homework altogether. You might even find me encouraging you to keep doing some of the homework that you are getting. But schools have adapted to a culture , where more homework is considered better. Especially in the case of high achieving societies, where children are expected to do well by the parents and the school is developing depression and anxiety-related symptoms that have directly been associated with increasing homework in junior and senior high school.

A general rule of thumb is to have 10 minutes of homework every increasing grade. With that reference, a first standard child should get 10 minutes of homework, while a high school senior is expected to get 2 hours of homework a night, and a kindergarten student, none.

I, personally, think it is a failure of the schools. Schools are pushing parents to teach their children through an awful amount of homework, which is only working as an advertisement for the institution, and not much progress is being made to the child’s academics.

Overworking

Schooling is a full-time job. The whole academic life of a student is a long term project. Just as you don’t expect to work beyond the decided hours, students should also not be forced to do school work outside the designated hours, including the homework. Yes, homework may be important, but forcing a child to overwork only contributes to their hatred towards school and education, as research suggests.

Family Stress, what about family stress? Parents without a college degree are more prone to accept the level of homework given to their child and in most cases are just hesitant to talk to the school about this because of their lack of higher formal education. Most of the parents who participated in this research have already started to develop stress-related family issues like separation and divorce.

Most of the parents with higher formal education just tell their children to avoid doing homework deliberately and engage them in more physical and mental afterschool activities.

Mental Stress with No Extra Benefits:

Homework over the 10 minutes per grade level doesn’t even work. It has no added benefit to your child’s academics. The only thing surplus homework contributes to is early depressive symptoms in children and their parents.

According to a Stanford University Study, 56% of students of various grades have regarded homework as ‘stressful’, and only 1% of the students don’t consider homework as a major source of stress.

Why have homework when it doesn’t even function beyond a certain point? Beats me. A student, grinding his way up in school and then again at home doesn’t sit well in parallel with the researchers either. Burnout is what they experience when subjected to a massive amount of homework, following the development of stress-related symptoms like tiredness, sleep deprivation, headache, and weight loss.

When research was conducted among 10 top-performing high schools and more than 4000 high schoolers, 80, yes, 80% of the students admitted to having at least one stress-related symptom during the past month, and 44% admitted to having more than three.

Disrupted Sleep

Students go through daily disrupted sleep cycles due to the massive amount of homework they have been given regularly. Not just with the sheer pressure of completing an assignment, more younger students are losing their sleep over the anxiety of being given more homework the next day or not being able to submit the remaining one.

A healthy sleep cycle is the single most critical thing in a child’s life to improve mental and physical health and not being provided enough is causing them to lose their quality of life.

Unethical Expectations:

Teachers often hand over homework that is way over a child’s ability to perform. They expect the parents to function better for their children and assist them with the homework. Which frequently often fails to derive the intended results.

Parents find themselves in a stressful competitive environment and often start to blame the student for failing to satisfy the unethical expectations of their school and parents.

In that scenario, students start to lose their self-confidence and perform worse in exams than intended. Which makes the parents blame more on themselves and their child, and the cycle goes on.

Loss of Social Life

Students prioritize homework over other social aspects. They lose the ability to communicate effectively, they start making fewer friends, they start losing their cognitive abilities to sing, dance, and paint, they start neglecting their sleep, food, family time, and pets. In the long term, they stop functioning as responsible adults and stop growing in physical and mental aspects prematurely.

If you are a student reading this, remember to not let your homework disrupt your normal life as a human. 8 hours of school in addition to 2 hours of homework is not what you only want to do with your life. If you have hobbies, be mindful to take care of those today.

If you are a parent, I congratulate you to take the first step. Talk to your school counsellor and your child if you think the homework they are getting is abusive.

How to Prioritize College Assignments [13 Tips]
How to Be a Good Student Leader
How To Incorporate Values in Students [39 Tips]
6 Tips for Business and Finance Students at Business School
Impact of Experiential Learning on International Students
20+ Best Books That Every College Student Must Read
Why Grading Is Important in Schools? 5 Major Reasons
Top Most Common Problems First-Year Students Face
How Your Pet Can Improve Your Studying Routine
Speaking: Styles, Purpose, Strategies
Student Routine: A Day In The Life Of A College Student
10 Reasons to Use Khan Academy
Delinquency and IQ in Criminal Behavior
Praxis Prep: Expert Strategies For Special Education Exam Success
How Golden Visas Can Help Students Pursue their Dreams in Europe?

8 Reasons Why Homework Shouldn’t be Banned

Are you wondering Why homework should not get banned? Many parents think homework is a waste of time, but there are many reasons why homework should not be Banned. Homework has a lot of benifits that many people do not know. Let us see what experts have to say about this concern.

Table of Contents

Here are five reasons why homework shouldn’t be banned

1. retention of class learning.

Students need to practice what they learn. If they do not practice, then they will forget what they learned.

This is a common problem: Children often get busy with their gadgets and play once at home. As a result, the learning in school starts fading. Homework gives the students a good revision and can refresh the teaching in the comfort of their Home.

Homework was invented for this reason by Roberto Nevilis, an Italian teacher who is considered the inventor of Homework. As a teacher, Nevilis found that his teachings lost meaning when students were taken away from the class and back home. Anguished that his students failed to overtake their peers despite their actions and efforts, he chose to use a different technique. So Homework was invented.

2. Scorecard for Teachers

Homework gives teachers insight into how well their students understand concepts. The seriousness of a child is determined by how much time and effort he dedicates to his homework. Is he focused or very casual with the task given?

The teacher would tailor their teaching based on the output that comes only from homework. It also helps the teacher to understand which student in the class needs more attention and guidance.

3. Focused Learning at Home

Homework allows students to work at their own pace. The classroom may not give you adequate time or attention to understand all the concepts and learning imparted among many students.

The classroom is a common environment when learning is standardized to suit a general audience in school. Going back home and looking at the same learning gives the child time to understand and pickup up the concepts of the topic.

Children can dwell more on the topic and do more research once at Home, as they have access to parents and other friends, which is impossible in the classroom setup. Taking extra classes or tuition is also a form of Lesson.

4. Get deeper learning

Homework provides opportunities for students to apply what they’ve learned. A student can check out library or internet resources or perform practical tasks at Home. This is an opportunity for students to get more insight into the topic learned in a classroom.

Students can even look up Youtube for videos on relevant topics. It is quite possible that student has not understood the lesson from the school teacher but may understand it better when taught by listening to many teachers on Youtube.

This time may create more doubts or questions, which the student can go back to school and ask the teacher. It will facilitate more interactive learning versus just simple theory.

5. Self Discipline

Homework can help students build self-discipline. This is the best way to prepare the child for life. Classroom learning and self-practice or homework will help the child be responsible and form discipline in life. This will help them to take up any responsibility in the future.

Discipline will put things in perspective and drive the child in a systemic approach to learning and life. This will also positively affect their mental health .

6. Homework gives teachers insight into how students learn best

Teachers need to understand how students learn so they can help them with their homework. They also need to ensure students do not fall behind because of missed assignments. To accomplish these goals, teachers must first determine how students learn best.

There are several ways to do this. One method is to observe students while they work on homework. Another option is to ask students to write their thoughts about how they learn best. A third option is questionnaires to find out how students learn best.

Once teachers have determined how students learn best, they can decide whether homework should be banned. If homework is banned, teachers should provide alternative activities such as reading books, playing games, watching movies, etc.

7. Homework allows parents to see how their children are doing at school

Parents often worry when their child starts school. They wonder what will happen to their child’s grades and test scores. However, research shows that homework does not affect student performance.

Students who complete more homework tend to perform better than those who do less homework. This is true even among students who struggle academically.

8. Homework provides a sense of accomplishment

In addition to helping students learn, homework also gives them a sense of accomplishment. Research has shown that children who feel good about themselves are more likely to succeed in school.

Students need to practice what they learn

Students should be allowed to complete homework assignments as often as possible. This will enable them to practice what they have learned. However, there are times when homework should be banned. These situations include:

When the student has been disruptive during class.
When the teacher feels that the assignment is too difficult.
When the teacher feels the student does not care about learning.
When the teacher feels it would be better to spend more time teaching than doing homework.
When the teacher feels they cannot give enough individual attention to each student.

Do you want to learn more exciting facts about Homework and would like to know who invented homework and why? Read Here.

Cookie banner

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from. To learn more or opt-out, read our Cookie Policy . Please also read our Privacy Notice and Terms of Use , which became effective December 20, 2019.

By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies.

Follow The Ringer online:

Follow The Ringer on Twitter
Follow The Ringer on Instagram
Follow The Ringer on Youtube

Filed under:

Five Big Questions About MLB’s Investigation Into Shohei Ohtani and His Interpreter

The newest Dodgers star and his longtime interpreter, Ippei Mizuhara, are at the center of an investigation into sports gambling debts and what Ohtani’s attorneys are calling “massive theft.” What do we know? Why has the story changed so much already? And what could come next?

Share this story

Share this on Facebook
Share this on Twitter
Share All sharing options

Share All sharing options for: Five Big Questions About MLB’s Investigation Into Shohei Ohtani and His Interpreter

Before this week, the worst one could say about Shohei Ohtani’s financial judgment was that he’d hawked FTX . His sole connection to shaky collateral was a twice-repaired UCL, and his only known ties to bookmaking operations were the biographies about him . The darkest secrets he was known to have hidden were his nuptials and the name of his dog.

Ohtani, Major League Baseball’s two-way player and singular sensation, had hogged center stage all offseason, occasionally commanding the crossover, mainstream attention that makes him the quasar at the heart of the game’s galaxy. He became the only player in baseball history to win a second unanimous MVP award; he signed a record-setting $700 million contract with the Los Angeles Dodgers after a free agent sweepstakes that sent fans in multiple countries on flights of fancy ; he formed a family and hard-launched it to the intense delight and/or heartbreak of his global stan base. On Wednesday, Ohtani hard-launched two hits on Opening Day after receiving a rock-star—OK, K-pop-star—reception in Seoul, the site of MLB’s season-opening series.

And then, just as spring started, the winter of Ohtani content turned to discontent. Following that first game, the Los Angeles Times and ESPN reported that Ohtani’s attorney had said that the newly debuted Dodger was “the victim of a massive theft.” The alleged thief was Ohtani’s longtime interpreter and close confidant, Ippei Mizuhara. At least $4.5 million was wired from Ohtani’s bank account to an associate of Mathew Bowyer , a bookmaker in California who’s under federal investigation because sports betting is illegal in the state. However, virtually all the other details—including who wired the money and why—are much murkier.

By contrast, the stakes couldn’t be clearer: nothing less than the career and reputation of baseball’s best, highest-paid, and most famous player, not to mention the sport’s perceived integrity in an era of ever-tightening ties between sports leagues and sportsbooks.

In response to reporters’ inquiries, Ohtani’s spokesman and Mizuhara first told one story (that Ohtani had helped pay off Mizuhara’s massive sports gambling debts), then switched to a second story that directly contradicted the first (that Ohtani had no knowledge of the debts and hadn’t transferred the funds). The flip-flop fueled conversations and conspiracy theories, fanned further by Mizuhara’s firing and replacement , an ESPN report that Ohtani’s representatives had contacted unspecified law enforcement authorities to request an investigation, and a subsequent AP report that Mizuhara and Bowyer (but not Ohtani) are under criminal investigation by the IRS. On Friday evening, MLB announced that its department of investigations has initiated a “formal process investigating the matter.”

To borrow a phrase from last year’s ESPN-produced documentary about Ohtani, we’ve gone beyond the dream . There’s no way for this story to have a happy ending, but the sadness of the denouement depends on details we don’t have. That lack of clarity makes for a vast possibility space in which some outcomes seem more likely than others but few are off the table entirely. Ohtani could be a deceptive degenerate, or he could be blameless, legally and/or ethically. He could be in big trouble—with both baseball and the law—or in no trouble at all. And MLB could have a huge scandal on its hands or one that will be easily dismissed, if not as easily forgotten.

Broadly speaking, there are three conceivable possibilities: that Ohtani knew and did nothing, and Ippei orchestrated everything; that Ohtani wasn’t the bettor, but he did knowingly send the money to pay off his friend’s debts; or that Ohtani placed the bets himself, in which case Mizuhara is merely a fall guy (whether willing or otherwise). Each potential explanation carries different consequences and spurs its own set of questions, which we’ll explore.

In January, I asked and answered 17 questions about Ohtani’s deal with the Dodgers. Today I’ll confine myself to five high-level mysteries about the mess he’s enmeshed in. Elusive as the answers seem, they will surface—and when they do, they’ll determine the course this uncharacteristically unsavory Ohtani news cycle takes.

1. Were any bets placed on baseball?

Nothing matters more than this. If the answer is yes, then there are realistic scenarios in which Ohtani would face stiff discipline, up to and including a lifetime ban from MLB. If the answer is no, then the worst-case outcomes for Ohtani would be taken off the table, and he might well emerge from the situation without suffering any punishment.

That stark disparity stems from major league Rule 21 , which lays out the penalties for players, umpires, and team or league officials or employees who place improper bets. Rule 21(d)(1) states that players and employees who bet on a game in which they aren’t involved face a one-year suspension. Rule 21(d)(2) warns that those who bet on a game in which they are involved shall be banned permanently. (You may have heard of Shoeless Joe Jackson and Pete Rose.)

Admittedly, non-baseball bets wouldn’t be out of the reach of the long arm of commissioner Rob Manfred (let alone of Uncle Sam). MLB players and personnel are allowed to bet on other sports, provided that those bets are placed legally. But any bets with Bowyer couldn’t have been because sports betting is still illegal in California. Thus, whoever placed these bets would still be subject to Rule 21(d)(3), which specifies that an applicable person who places a bet with an illegal bookmaker or their associate “shall be subject to such penalty as the Commissioner deems appropriate in light of the facts and circumstances of the conduct.”

Rule 21 also includes a blanket “other misconduct” clause, which says that “any and all other acts, transactions, practices or conduct not to be in the best interests of Baseball are prohibited and shall be subject to such penalties, including permanent ineligibility, as the facts in the particular case may warrant.”

In other words: The commissioner has a lot of leeway to handle the situation as he sees fit. That’s the thing, though: If either Mizuhara or Ohtani did bet on baseball, that leeway goes away. The facts and circumstances are immaterial; it’s an automatic ejection, as with telling an umpire that they’re horseshit . If neither bet on baseball, extenuating circumstances count, and the commissioner can be lenient.

As of now, there’s no evidence that the alleged bets with Bowyer’s operation were related to baseball. ESPN has cited “multiple sources,” including Mizuhara, who’ve insisted that none of the bets were on baseball: “I never bet on baseball,” Ippei told ESPN. “That’s 100 percent. I knew that rule.” The bets, he said, were placed on international soccer, the NBA, the NFL, and college football. That may be true, but Mizuhara’s version of events can’t be taken at face value. (Neither, evidently , can every declaration in his public bio.) If he was a compulsive gambler facing steep debts, it might have been hard for him to resist using his inside info on baseball’s best player. Which is why it’s imperative that MLB gets to the bottom of this question.

2. What’s with the conflicting stories?

The strangest aspect of this story is the about-face by both Mizuhara and Ohtani’s spokesman between Tuesday and Wednesday. Remember, both said on Tuesday that Ohtani had made the payments to settle Ippei’s debt. According to the timeline published Friday at ESPN—the darkest timeline , save for any timeline that includes bets being placed on baseball—the spokesman quoted Ohtani as saying, “Yeah, I sent several large payments. That’s the maximum amount I could send.” Mizuhara corroborated that tale, telling ESPN, “I explained my situation, and obviously he wasn’t happy about it, but he said he would help me.” (Mizuhara added that Ohtani didn’t know or ask about the legality—or lack thereof—of the payments and that “I don’t think either of us thought about that at the time at all.”)

On Wednesday, both Mizuhara and the spokesman disavowed those previous statements. “Ippei was lying,” the spokesman said. “Shohei didn’t know.” Ippei then corroborated that tale, and Ohtani’s attorneys pivoted to providing an account of “massive theft.” What the hell happened here, and what did Sho know ?

Well, it is illegal to wire money to an illegal bookmaking operation, even if it’s to do a solid for a friend, not to place bets for oneself. Perhaps the lawyers stepped in to point out that having copped to that crime put their client at risk, and they advised shifting the story to one that would exonerate him. (Maybe someone should’ve consulted them sooner.)

If this is what happened, other aspects wouldn’t add up. Would Ohtani have turned on his bestie so suddenly? Would Ippei go along with a worked shoot that painted him not just as a guy with a gambling problem who unknowingly placed illegal bets, but as someone who also stole millions of dollars to cover the resulting debts? If not, wouldn’t that story probably be exposed as fiction? And in that case, wouldn’t the cover-up be worse than the crime?

No one would think less of Ohtani for using his wealth to bail out a desperate friend—hell, few people would think less of Ohtani for actually betting on non-baseball sports, which is legal in most of the country. But attempting to throw that friend under the bus would be a different matter.

Plus, Ohtani might not even get in trouble for trying to be a Good Samaritan. Yes, in that scenario he would’ve broken the law, but as The Athletic noted , “The government generally goes after bookmakers, not bettors”—and Ohtani wouldn’t even have been a bettor. The consequences for falsely reporting a “massive theft” would probably be way worse.

Then there’s another obvious question: Could Mizuhara have sent $4.5 million or more without Ohtani’s knowledge? That doesn’t sound easy , but it isn’t impossible. For one thing, the payments were broken into $500,000 installments, which may have prompted less scrutiny from the bank, especially with a wealthy, reputable client like Ohtani. Ohtani has never seemed primarily motivated by maximizing his nest egg; he passed up (or delayed) a huge payday by leaving Nippon Professional Baseball for MLB when international signing rules limited him to the major league minimum. Between his salary and his endorsements, Ohtani made $65 million last year and is in line to make slightly more in 2024, not counting the hundreds of millions he has coming to him in (potentially tax-free) deferred dollars down the road. How closely do we think he’s been monitoring his balance?

What’s more, Ohtani may have given great latitude in his personal life and financial matters to Ippei, whom he met in 2013 when Ohtani was an 18-year-old rookie for the Nippon-Ham Fighters. Ohtani has been wealthy, well-known, and single-mindedly devoted to baseball since he was a teenager; it’s not unreasonable to think that he delegated more to Ippei than was wise. (Never underestimate how oblivious kids and the rich can be about money.)

Ippei wasn’t just Ohtani’s longtime interpreter, though that alone is a fairly intimate role; he also drove Ohtani around , played and practiced with him, went out to eat with him, and so on. The two were constant companions: Ippei, who is 10 years older, described himself and Ohtani to ESPN as “brothers” and said he spent more time with Ohtani than with his own wife. Two team changes, a move between countries and continents, and a pandemic couldn’t keep them apart. Only this scandal could separate them.

Another common objection to the “Ippei acted alone” theory of the case is the size of his debt: Why would a bookie allow an interpreter who was making at most roughly $500,000 a year to rack up many multiples of that in debt? I’ve never been a bookie, but the potential for extortion could’ve crossed Bowyer’s mind. One ESPN story suggests that the name on the wire transfers might have had value: “Bowyer allowed people to believe Ohtani was a client in order to boost business.” Bowyer’s own attorney has attributed her client’s largesse to the fact that Ippei was Ohtani’s best friend. And if Ippei said that Ohtani would make him whole, those periodic payments would have bolstered his story. Plus, which seems more plausible: that Bowyer extended Ippei a large line of credit, or that Ohtani placed the bets but didn’t cover his losses and thus racked up some massive debts?

On Thursday, Ohtani’s reps advanced an explanation for the story switcheroo, which ESPN recounted: “As Ohtani’s handlers tried to determine what had happened, they initially relied solely on Mizuhara, who continued to translate for Ohtani.” Friday’s more detailed account offered further insight into what seems to have been an unbelievably bungled response to a serious situation. The rep who initially confirmed Mizuhara’s account was a crisis-communications spokesman who had just been hired and who was communicating with ESPN even as the spokesman was still “getting up to speed on information from the Ohtani camp”—meaning Mizuhara, evidently. Is the point of hiring a crisis-communications spokesman to make the crisis … worse? That the spokesman and, seemingly, Ohtani’s agent Nez Balelo were communicating with Ohtani via Mizuhara—assuming Ohtani was even involved—despite Mizuhara ostensibly being the cause of the crisis is confounding enough. That they then arranged for Mizuhara to speak to ESPN for 90 minutes without a lawyer present is mind-boggling. Great job defusing the situation, fellas! Truly, top men .

Ippei told ESPN’s Tisha Thompson that he never purposely misinformed Ohtani while fielding inquiries from ESPN. Even if that’s true, perhaps he didn’t inform Ohtani at all, which is what Ohtani’s reps now claim. (Though Ohtani typically—but not always —communicates through Ippei in public settings, he is, by many accounts, proficient enough in English that it seems unlikely that his interpreter could completely mistranslate his words in his presence without Ohtani noticing.) If Ippei was withholding and fabricating throughout the exchange, it’s unclear how he thought he would get away with that indefinitely—crime doesn’t Ippei—but perhaps he was in panic mode and simply trying to buy time. If so, time ran out after the Dodgers game on Wednesday, when team owner Mark Walter told the players that a negative story was coming, Ippei addressed the clubhouse to apologize and disclose his gambling addiction, and Dodgers president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman stood up and said that Ohtani had helped pay Ippei’s debts.

According to Ohtani’s camp—minus Mizuhara, a little too late—Ohtani didn’t realize what was happening until a new interpreter was brought in during the postgame clubhouse meeting. While traveling back to the hotel, Ohtani told his reps that he “didn’t recognize Mizuhara’s version of the events.” Shortly after that, the reps said, Ohtani discovered money missing from his account. “He didn’t know what the fuck was going on,” the spokesman told ESPN. Neither did the spokesman, it seems. At the very least, it sounds as if Ohtani and his team were entirely too lax and gullible. But then, that would tend to support the idea that they all trusted Ippei implicitly, which could lend credence to the notion that Ippei had the authority and autonomy to betray his “brother.”

Reality gets messy, and the truth could be a blend of both stories. Maybe Ohtani made some of the payments, but Mizuhara made more without his knowledge. Or maybe Ohtani made all of the payments but did so under false pretenses, such that his lawyers could assert that Mizuhara scammed him.

And while we can’t rule out the “Ohtani as criminal mastermind” theory, it certainly doesn’t seem likely that Ohtani is secretly a gambling addict. ESPN’s report mentions that “multiple sources, including Mizuhara, [said] that Ohtani does not gamble,” which is backed up by Bowyer’s lawyer’s statement that Bowyer “never met or spoke with Shohei Ohtani,” as well as Ohtani’s former teammates’ contention to Angels beat writer Jeff Fletcher that Ohtani “never paid attention to other sports.” But people dealing with addiction often get good at hiding it, even from their friends and relatives. And a month ago, it didn’t seem likely that Ohtani was secretly in a long-term relationship and about to announce he was married. Watching someone play baseball doesn’t mean we really know them. Prior to this week, Ohtani had a pretty unimpeachable reputation on a personal level, but that’s partly because he’s so private that there was little to impeach.

The tragic thing is that the more exculpatory the truth is for Ohtani, the more manipulative it would mean Mizuhara was. Which means that the only way for Ohtani to face no legal liability or discipline from the league is for his friend and brother to have totally taken advantage of him. Maybe he’d make that trade, but it’s bound to be a painful one. We’ve seen Ohtani play through—and excel despite —the distress of impending serious surgery. But it’s one thing to lose a ligament and another to lose a friend. The best-case outcome for MLB is that an addiction costs Ippei his livelihood and robs him and Ohtani of a cherished relationship. (The breakup feels real; Shohei has scrubbed Ippei from his Instagram .) That would hardly be something to celebrate.

3. Will Manfred and MLB give Ohtani preferential treatment?

Not if they want to maintain credibility in staying on top of the potential ill effects of the league’s embrace of betting. Ohtani is MLB’s golden goose, the last player Manfred would want to miss time or have his character tarnished. The league has already rewritten the rules on the field to accommodate Ohtani. That’s all the more reason to treat him the same off the field as anyone else.

That’s not to say that the league should go out of its way to make an example of Ohtani. In 2015, Marlins pitcher Jarred Cosart was found to have placed illegal non-baseball bets. Manfred fined him and moved on, and everyone forgot about it until we started searching for precedents for the current controversy. If Ohtani didn’t do anything worse than Cosart, he shouldn’t suffer a harsher fate.

However, there would be a price to pay for any appearance of favoritism. ESPN first approached MLB about this story on Sunday evening (Monday morning in Seoul). On Thursday, The Athletic reported that Ohtani was “not currently facing discipline” and that he was “not believed to be under active investigation by the league.” On Friday morning, a league spokesperson said MLB was “looking into” the matter and “gathering information.” “Gathering information” isn’t so different from “investigating,” but the lack of an official inquiry—and the Friday evening form the eventual announcement took— invited criticism .

We can make some allowances for the timing—Manfred and the Dodgers were traveling to and from Seoul—and it’s generally better to slow down before acting than to jump the gun the way Ohtani’s PR people did. But the backlash to the merest hint that MLB might be failing to do its due diligence illustrates the importance of the appearance of propriety. The more rigorous MLB seems to be, the less likely it is that some Michael Jordan – esque stain will stick to Ohtani even in the event that he did nothing wrong. Some people still believe that Houston Astros second baseman José Altuve was wearing a buzzer in 2017; Manfred is well aware of what happens when fans believe players got off too easy.

The 2017 Astros actually did steal signs illegally, though. As of yet, there’s no proof that Ohtani broke any rules or laws, let alone compromised the sport’s competitive integrity.

4. Will this scandal inspire a larger sports gambling reckoning?

Nah. Sports leagues have been in bed with sportsbooks for years now, and they’re burrowing deeper under the blankets by the day . (Sports media is widely sponsored by sportsbooks, too.) Unless somebody is found to have bet on baseball—which, we must stress once more, hasn’t been alleged—this likely won’t morph into an extinction-level scandal that forces serious self-reflection. Still, you can dodge potentially hazardous asteroids for only so many centuries before one of them moves from close call to collision course.

March is Problem Gambling Awareness Month , so this story is certainly doing its part. The publicity surrounding Ohtani could make this case a useful stalking horse for those in favor of regulating sports gambling marketing . Conveniently for MLB, though, this situation revolved around illegal betting, not the kind that could ensnare an official league partner (though Mizuhara said he had previously bet on DraftKings, which does have a relationship with the league). Manfred could even use this situation to stigmatize unsanctioned bookmaking and praise the virtues of gambling legally . After all, if wagering were legal in California, nobody would have had to be in business with Bowyer.

Plenty of gamblers have legally ruined their lives; it can come with the habit. Nor need we look beyond baseball ( or the NFL ) to find cautionary stories that started on solid legal ground. If Ippei—who was raised in California but said he didn’t know that wagering was illegal there—succumbed to a severe gambling problem, he’s one of a growing number of people in the U.S. who are suffering from the same vice. That doesn’t mean we’ll get game-fixing again at the big league level, but it does suggest that Ohtani, like LeBron before him , won’t be the last star caught up in something similarly unseemly.

5. When will we actually get some answers?

Fittingly enough, we don’t know. According to ESPN’s T.J. Quinn, MLB will try to arrange interviews with all relevant parties, but it can’t compel Ippei’s participation now that he no longer works for a team. (Too bad MLB didn’t interview him on Tuesday or Wednesday, when he was all too eager to talk.) Ohtani, too, could decline to cooperate, a right afforded to members of the MLBPA. Or, per Quinn, he could “invoke his right, under an interpretation of arbitration precedent, to refuse cooperation because of a criminal investigation that’s already underway” (though he’s not known to be the subject of any criminal investigation and doesn’t seem likely to be targeted).

MLB’s paid administrative leave policy, which Trevor Bauer and Julio Urías were placed on during their days with the Dodgers, applies only to players who are being investigated for violations of the joint domestic violence, sexual assault, and child abuse policy. Ohtani hasn’t even been accused of dealing directly with Bowyer, to say nothing of betting on baseball. Thus, the expectation is that he’ll remain on the active roster and continue to play as the process plays out.

That’s probably going to be weird for a while. On Wednesday, the Dodgers released a boilerplate statement . Before Thursday’s game, manager Dave Roberts—the only member of the organization who talked to the press— said , “I’m not going to talk about it.” Team president Stan Kasten declined to comment, and Friedman remarked, “There’s nothing to say. Literally nothing to say.” Ohtani didn’t answer questions after the game.

The Dodgers will return to playing exhibition games in Arizona on Sunday, in advance of Thursday’s resumption of their regular season. It may be harder to duck questions at home than it was 6,000 miles away, and while this week’s events made clear that we can’t anticipate what Ohtani’s handlers will do, it wouldn’t be surprising for him to remain mum on the matter until MLB’s investigation concludes. In the meantime, his reps (and, separately, Ippei’s) will likely comb through records to document whatever access the interpreter may have had to Ohtani’s accounts, the circumstances in which the payments were made, and any relevant communications between the two. The public may have to be patient—the wheels of justice sometimes turn slowly at MLB, though they’re grinding faster at the IRS these days—but this doesn’t seem like a case where we’ll never know what happened.

I don’t have hard-and-fast beliefs about any of this because we don’t know enough to draw conclusions. Granted, who wouldn’t want the most talented, dynamic, and seemingly likable player the sport has seen in years to stay clean? (Well, maybe some Giants fans.) Without Ohtani, what would I write and talk about ? But the inner-fan impulse to cry “Say it ain’t Sho” isn’t a reason not to follow the wire transfers where they lead, without fear or favor. My mental New York Times needle has been pinging among multiple outcomes, though it seems to have settled on “this is more likely to blow over than to blow up.” (Any more than it’s blown up already, that is.) But Ohtani plus anything is a formula for a frenzy, and unless he’s conclusively cleared, this story won’t die down—which isn’t the way Manfred wants to steal headlines from March Madness as a new MLB season starts.

Up until now, the news about Ohtani has almost always been blissful, except when he’s blown out his elbow. (In Japan, he’s known as “the perfect person.”) Now, we’re learning what it looks like when Ohtani’s celebrity backfires. The 29-year-old’s UCL issues have jeopardized his future on the mound, but they don’t endanger his hitting. Maybe by default, then, the specter of bad sports betting behavior poses a greater existential threat—however remote—to his future on the field. The next time he fails to silence the skeptics will be the first, but the hurdle he’s facing is unprecedented: the kind he can’t overcome with swings or sweepers.

Next Up In MLB

Knicks eye the third seed, yankees and mets prep for opening day, and coach o’toole talks sweet 16.

NCAA Tournament Update, NBA Play of the Day, and 2024 MLB Best Bets
Is Joe Mazzulla Underrated? Plus, the Red Sox Rotation Is Set.
LeBron James Is a Podcaster, the Shohei Ohtani Affair, and Covering the Royals With Jay Caspian Kang and Ellie Hall
Opening-Round Best Bets, MLB Home Run Leader, Sharp Tank
Mets Sign J.D. Martinez, Mike Williams to the Jets, and Jorge Posada Looks Back at the ‘90s Yankees

Sign up for the The Ringer Newsletter

Thanks for signing up.

Check your inbox for a welcome email.

Oops. Something went wrong. Please enter a valid email and try again.

The ‘3 Body Problem’ Exit Survey

Time to discuss Sophons, wallfacers, and whether the creators of ‘Game of Thrones’ have made another hit

‘OSP’ Round 2 Rapid Reactions: Big-Picture Stuff, Conference Beefs, and More With J. Kyle Mann

Tate and Kyle react to all the best (and worst) moments from Round 2 of the NCAA tournament

Anthony Edwards and the Mindless Quest to Find the “Next Jordan”

Are we really doing this again? Have we not learned our lesson? Yes, Edwards might look and fly like Mike, but we should know better than to compare him to the GOAT.

People come out to Vote in the Georgia Primary

Greg Bluestein on Fani Willis, Biden, and Trump’s Early Outlook in Georgia

Bakari Sellers is joined by Atlanta Journal-Constitution political reporter Greg Bluestein to talk the latest in the 2024 presidential race

JJ recaps the opening weekend of the 2024 NCAA men’s tournament, then talks Yankees, Mets, Knicks, and more

NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament - Second Round - Northwestern v UConn

“Blame the White Sox for Hip-Hop”

Jason discusses the second round of March Madness games, the Kim Mulkey press conference, and the end of Northwestern’s season

20 Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned

Post author By admin
September 19, 2022

Colleges and schools give a lot of homework to students. Students often do it incorrectly because they don’t have enough information and knowledge. Sometimes students get new and unknown tasks to complete. Even at home, students are unable to find anyone to assist.

These types of practices make things worse. Facts are overwhelming nowadays, which is one of the reasons why homework should be banned. Today’s parents are too busy with their responsibilities to run their families effectively. They are frequently unable to teach their students about the subjects.

These factors leave a student alone to gather knowledge and do homework. When these students return to school the next day, their teachers may punish or scold them for their poor presentation.

Table of Contents

Why Homework Should Be Banned

We can’t say that homework is not important, homework also has its importance , but that does not mean that it is too necessary. It creates many types of problems for students and their parents, which is why people demand to ban homework.

These are some of the reasons why homework should be banned -:

Homework Restricts A Student’s Freedom

No Time For Exercises
No Time To Play Outdoor Games

Often Breaks Students’ Confidence

Homework doing not an achievement, most homework creates bad habits, less time to spend with family members, conflict with parents, downtime at home, negative impact on tests, writing has different effects, extra challenges, homework causes depression, homework provides no real benefit, too much homework means not enough time for yourself, school is a full-time job, no real impact on performance, irrelevant content.

In most cases, children do not want to get up early in the morning. When they sleep for long periods and wake up late in the morning, they feel more relaxed and energetic. The best time for students to spend more time in bed is during the holidays. If kids are assigned homework during the holidays, it becomes a painful task. Students must finish assignments on time, regardless of the consequences. In any case, they must study every day. This is the first reason why homework should be banned.

No Time For Exercises

Exercises are suitable for people of all ages. Persons of any age group can do activities. Students go to school, spend hours there, and then return home. They don’t have a lot of time to become fresh and eat. Most students go to their rooms to rest before beginning to work on their homework. They are busy doing school homework at home during the week and on weekends. This is the second reason why homework should be banned.

No Time To Play Outdoor Games

More students take part in home activities these days. Students do not have enough free time to participate in sports. They’re on their way out the door to finish their homework. Parents have been unable to discover a solution to this problem. They have all of these headaches and are exhausted. The clock runs its way, and by the time they’ve finished, it’s bedtime. This is the third reason why homework should be banned.

Homework cannot be achieved without the use of the tool. Nobody can judge a student’s ability just on their homework. Many students are unfamiliar with the topic and how to complete it correctly. If you provide incorrect information, you will be misusing the concepts you are familiar with. Facts are overpowering, which is why homework should be banned.

Suppose many students do it incorrectly and that several teachers make fun of them in class. Because of uncultured experts, it occurs in many schools. Such activities will break students’ confidence. Regardless, teachers should assist students in gaining a thorough comprehension of concepts and showing how to apply them to the subject. This is the fourth reason why homework should be banned.

Students who complete homework according to a teacher’s instructions will not succeed. If you spend all of your time studying and working hard on your lesson, you will not have enough time to do other tasks. It becomes boring for you. It has the potential to impact the causal relationship with others. Doing homework is not a learning process. Students treat homework as though it were a competition with their classmates. This is the fifth reason why homework should be banned.

If a student continues to work on homework, additional study time for another topic will be added to the stack. You will be unable to study and read due to a lack of time. Many students treat homework as though it were a daily task. Homework rarely motivates students. They have no idea what the topic is and finish it without any motivation. This is why homework should be banned because it is discouraging. This is the sixth reason why homework should be banned.

A student’s hours are consumed by their homework load. For a child to grasp the relationships between different persons, family time is crucial when they are young. It reduces the amount of time that children must spend with their families. It helps form social bonds and teaches them how to live in society. This is the seventh reason why homework should be banned.

Students frequently refuse to do homework or study. They are exhausted and wish to rest. This might lead to a disagreement between children and their parents. Parents never want to scold their children, but situations force them to do so. This is the eighth reason why homework should be banned.

Homework Can Encourage Cheating

When students have a large amount of work to complete in a short amount of time, they copy from other students. This attempt to duplicate leads to them learning how to cheat effectively such that teachers are unable to differentiate between the two works. If a teacher finds both works similar, they may punish both. With the availability of generative AI writing tools like ChatGPT that assist in making interactive brochures and other homework related tasks. This can get students into a lot of trouble with writing assignments being detected by an accurate AI content detector . This is why homework should be banned. This is the ninth reason why homework should be banned.

Also Read -: Best Homework Songs to Listen

After 8 hours in class, 2 hours of homework is a punishment. Professors should provide students with more unscheduled time. Going outside, hanging out with friends, joining hobby organizations, supporting parents, and, yes, watching TV and playing video games all make children feel like kids. This is the tenth reason why homework should be banned.

One of the main reasons homework should be banned is that many teachers cannot provide all the information needed to finish the lesson during class. Parents also can’t help their children with all tasks. The friends of students lack the experience to assist them. Online assignment companies are the options for them. They only can help students with their homework of any level. This is the eleventh reason why homework should be banned.

Even though students understand the subject, the lack of writing or research skills can cause them to fail the entire course, and many teachers do nothing to help them. This is the twelth reason why homework should be banned.

It is challenging for students who juggle their business schedules with activities after classes, internships, and part-time jobs to keep up. They are exhausted at the end of the day. This is the thirteen reason why homework should be banned.

Having too much homework can negatively affect students’ mental and physical health. Five-six per cent of students say their homework is the primary source of stress and exhaustion, according to a Stanford University study. Lack of sleep, headaches, and weight loss can result from too much homework. This is the fourteen reason why homework should be banned.

Many teachers believe that students will become better and remember more if they give them more homework. However, this is not always the case, as more homework results in students not learning. Students are being pushed into a corner of stress by homework instead of using it as a tool to encourage them to learn more.

A lot of homework negatively impacts academic performance. Although homework can contribute to higher grades, it mostly has diminishing returns. This is the fifteen reasons why homework should be banned.

Too Much Homework Means Not Enough Time For Yourself

Students who spend too much time on homework fail to develop their life skills and developmental needs. A student who has too much homework is more likely to avoid participating in activities outside of school, such as sports, music, etc.

Additionally, if students spend all their time doing homework, they may not develop essential life skills, such as independence, cooking skills, time management, or social skills.

Most students feel forced to prioritize their homework over discovering and developing other skills and talents. By not having homework, they could spend more time on their interests, such as dancing, video gaming, and painting, thus fitting into society as they grow older. This is the sixteen reason why homework should be banned.

For most kids in Taiwan, school begins at 8 a.m. and ends at 5 p.m. or later. Each day, kids put in about 9 hours of work into their education. Students do extracurricular activities to compete and survive in society, such as attending cram school, learning musical instruments, and participating in sports. They quickly spend more than 10 hours a day engaged in school-related activities. This is the seventeenth reason why homework should be banned.

In 4 hours of weekly home-taken assignments, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) discovered that spending more time on education has no effect on productivity. This is the eighteen reason why homework should be banned.

If homework has nothing to do with the topic or subject being studied, it should be banned. It’s unethical to assign homework that students haven’t completed in class and expect good grades. This is the nineteen reason why homework should be banned.

Also read : Is Homework Illegal AnyWhere?

20 Other Reasons about Why Homework Should be Banned

These are the 20 reasons because of why homework should be banned:

Waste time of Students
It affects the physical health of students
It affects the mental health of students
Homework does not provide practical knowledge
Homework creates the habit of Procrastination in children
Because of homework children starts hating study
It forces children to work like a robot
Homework is boring
Does not help that much in study
It creates the habit of memorizing concepts in the students
Children start thinking of their parents and teachers as a villain
Homework creates pressure on the students
No time left for students to learn something new
Homework repeats the already taught concepts of school
The teacher gives a lot of homework to students
It increases the daily tasks of the students
Another burden on the students
No family time left for the students
It makes students feel like a puppet
Students lose their confidence if they fail to do their homework.

List Of The Pros Of Banning Homework

Homework Does Not Improve Student Academic Performance.

The reality of homework for modern students is that we don’t know if assigning an extra task outside of class is helpful. Each study contains several flaws, resulting in unreliable data & Students also search for someone to do their homework online. Some research suggests that students in secondary schools or higher can benefit from little homework; banning it for younger students may make sense for their learning experience.

Banning Homework Can Reduce Burnout Among Students.

Today, teachers are paying more attention to homework stress in the classroom. Over 25% of grade school professors say that they have seen students stressed out by homework. When students are dealing with the impact of homework, it can have a tremendous negative impact.

It Can Help You Spend More Time With Your Family.

Homework creates a noticeable disruption to family connections. It not only cuts down on time spent with family, but it also reduces the opportunities for parents to teach their values and talents to their children. Over half of North American parents say they’ve had a significant disagreement with their children about schoolwork in the last month. Homework is identified as the leading source of trouble in one-third of families.

It Can Reduce The Negative Impact Of Homework On The Student’s Health.

When students fail to complete a homework assignment on time, they suffer mental distress. When the outcome occurs, assumptions are frequently made about the student’s time management skills, but the reasons are usually more complex. It may be too challenging, tedious, or uninteresting, or there may be insufficient time in the day to finish the task. When students fail in this area, it can lead to serious mental health problems. It can discourage a desire to learn in students. Some people believe they are intellectual failures who will never live a good life.

Why Homework is good

Here are a few reasons why homework is good .

Increase Memory Power.
Enhances Concentration.
Homework Strengthens Problem-Solving.
Helps in Developing Analytical Skills.
Discipline Skills.

Also read : Who Invented Homework And Why? Best Facts You Should Know

List Of The Cons Of Banning Homework

Homework can assist parents and educators in determining a child’s learning skills..

Many children develop a self-defense strategy that helps them fit in with the other students in their class. This procedure allows them to hide learning problems that may be hindering their academic achievement. Because children cannot hide their learning problems while working one-on-one with their parents on specific subjects, homework allows teachers and parents to uncover this problem. By banning homework, you’re removing half of the opportunity to spot possible issues right away.

It Teaches Students How To Manage Their Time Effectively.

As people get older, they recognize that time is a limited resource. To increase productivity, it is critical to managing time wisely. Homework is an excellent technique to encourage the development of abilities in children as early as school. The trick is to keep the time allocated for work to a minimum. Students should spend 10 minutes on schoolwork and plan their schedules accordingly. If a student is having trouble creating a program, the family should provide them with the opportunity to do so.

Homework Allows Parents To Participate In Their Children’s Education.

Parents must be aware of what their children are learning in school. Even when a parent inquires about their children’s learning, the response is more generic than precise. Parents will see and experience their children’s growth in what they are doing while they are at school throughout the day if work is sent home from the classroom. Parents can readily participate in the learning process to reinforce their children’s essential concepts every day.

Is Homework Good or Bad?

What are your thoughts on whether is homework good or bad ? It is essential to consult with students and their parents. Parents work hard to keep track of their children’s progress in every field. When it comes to family tours and celebrations, homework becomes a source of frustration. The majority of homework takes up a child’s spare time. To live, it’s not enough to breathe. More is required for a student to have a happy childhood and grow peacefully. It would help if you understood why homework should be banned.

Another point to consider is that homework is not an after-school activity. Parents provide tutors for their children who are having difficulty with their homework. This keeps a student occupied during their free time. Many parents choose to send their children to boarding schools. You should be aware of your child’s activities and achievements. It is a source of worry about whether homework is harmful or beneficial to students. It is something that parents and teachers should seriously consider.

Should We Get Rid of Homework?

Homework is a big topic, and some people wonder if we should get rid of it. Homework is when teachers give you work to do at home, like math problems, reading, or projects. Some people think it’s a good way to practice what you learned in school, but others say it’s not so great.

People who want to get rid of homework say it can be too much. It can take up a lot of your free time, leaving less time to play and relax. Some kids also feel stressed and worried about getting their homework done. They might even need help from their parents, and that can be tough if their parents are busy too.

But not everyone agrees. Some think homework helps you learn better. It can reinforce what you learn in class and make you more responsible. You can also get extra practice, which might make you better at things like math or reading.

In this blog, we have discussed why homework should be banned and the pros and cons of banning homework. I hope you have understood why homework should be banned easily.

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

What are the negative effects of too much homework.

Overburdening students with homework can lead to stress, worry, despair, physical illnesses, and even lower exam scores.

How much homework is appropriate for high schoolers?

Students in high school are capable of handling additional schoolwork. According to the 10-minute rule per grade, freshmen should have no more than 90 minutes of homework, and seniors should have no more than 2 hours.

Why does homework exist?

Homework helps teachers determine how well the lessons are being understood by their students.

australia (2)
duolingo (13)
Education (264)
General (58)
How To (16)
IELTS (127)
Latest Updates (162)
Malta Visa (6)
Permanent residency (1)
Programming (31)
Scholarship (1)
Sponsored (4)
Study Abroad (187)
Technology (12)
work permit (8)

Chuck Schumer on His Campaign to Oust Israel’s Leader

The senate majority leader, chuck schumer, explains why he decided to speak out against benjamin netanyahu, the israeli prime minister..

Hosted by Michael Barbaro

Featuring Annie Karni

Produced by Will Reid and Michael Simon Johnson

With Eric Krupke

Edited by Marc Georges and Paige Cowett

Original music by Dan Powell and Marion Lozano

Engineered by Alyssa Moxley

Listen and follow The Daily Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music

In a pointed speech from the Senate floor this month, the majority leader, Chuck Schumer, called for Israel to hold a new election and for voters to oust the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Soon after, Annie Karni, a congressional correspondent for the Times, sat down with Mr. Schumer to understand why he did it.

On today’s episode

Annie Karni , a congressional correspondent for The New York Times.

Chuck Schumer is wearing a suit and glasses. He looks off in the distance with a stern look on his face.

Background reading

Mr. Schumer, America’s highest-ranking Jewish elected official, said he felt obligated to call for new leadership in Israel .

His speech was the latest reflection of the growing dissatisfaction among Democrats with Israel’s conduct of the war in Gaza.

There are a lot of ways to listen to The Daily. Here’s how.

We aim to make transcripts available the next workday after an episode’s publication. You can find them at the top of the page.

The Daily is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Chris Wood, Jessica Cheung, Stella Tan, Alexandra Leigh Young, Lisa Chow, Eric Krupke, Marc Georges, Luke Vander Ploeg, M.J. Davis Lin, Dan Powell, Sydney Harper, Mike Benoist, Liz O. Baylen, Asthaa Chaturvedi, Rachelle Bonja, Diana Nguyen, Marion Lozano, Corey Schreppel, Rob Szypko, Elisheba Ittoop, Mooj Zadie, Patricia Willens, Rowan Niemisto, Jody Becker, Rikki Novetsky, John Ketchum, Nina Feldman, Will Reid, Carlos Prieto, Ben Calhoun, Susan Lee, Lexie Diao, Mary Wilson, Alex Stern, Dan Farrell, Sophia Lanman, Shannon Lin, Diane Wong, Devon Taylor, Alyssa Moxley, Summer Thomad, Olivia Natt, Daniel Ramirez and Brendan Klinkenberg.

Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly. Special thanks to Sam Dolnick, Paula Szuchman, Lisa Tobin, Larissa Anderson, Julia Simon, Sofia Milan, Mahima Chablani, Elizabeth Davis-Moorer, Jeffrey Miranda, Renan Borelli, Maddy Masiello, Isabella Anderson and Nina Lassam.

Annie Karni is a congressional correspondent for The Times. She writes features and profiles, with a recent focus on House Republican leadership. More about Annie Karni

IMAGES

15 Major Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned
Major 20 Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned
15+ Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned
Best 20 Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned
Top 20 Reasons Why Homework Should Not Be Banned
9 Major Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned

COMMENTS

‎The Dailey Dose: Why Homework Should be Banned
This podcast episode is about why I believe homework should be banned. ‎Show The Dailey Dose, Ep Why Homework Should be Banned - Andrew Kim - 26 Feb 2024 Exit
Is it time to get rid of homework? Mental health experts weigh in
Emmy Kang, mental health counselor at Humantold , says studies have shown heavy workloads can be "detrimental" for students and cause a "big impact on their mental, physical and emotional health ...
Homework Pros and Cons
From dioramas to book reports, from algebraic word problems to research projects, whether students should be given homework, as well as the type and amount of homework, has been debated for over a century. []While we are unsure who invented homework, we do know that the word "homework" dates back to ancient Rome. Pliny the Younger asked his followers to practice their speeches at home.
25 Reasons Homework Should Be Banned (Busywork Arguments)
Excessive workload. The issue of excessive workload is a common complaint among students. Spending several hours on homework after a full school day can be mentally and physically draining. This workload can lead to burnout, decreased motivation, and negative attitudes toward school and learning.
Should We Get Rid of Homework?
A defense of rote practice through homework might seem revanchist at this moment, but if we truly believe that schools should teach children lessons that fall outside the meritocracy, I can't ...
Why does homework exist?
Nobody knows what the point of homework is. The homework wars are back. As the Covid-19 pandemic began and students logged into their remote classrooms, all work, in effect, became homework. But ...
Should Schools Ban Homework?
Bans proposed and implemented in the U.S. and abroad. The struggle of whether or not to assign homework is not a new one. In 2017, a Florida superintendent banned homework for elementary schools in the entire district, with one very important exception: reading at home. The United States isn't the only country to question the benefits of ...
Should homework be banned?
The podcast asks questions like should homework be banned, is envy even a bad thing, and how do you win an argument with a parent? ... Season 17 has been released in full just in time for the school holidays, and this season of the ABC podcast will help get the kids thinking about pop culture, technology and the future.
Should we ban homework?
Molly and Carl find out whether teachers should be allowed to give you work to do outside of school time. Brain Trust — Casuarina Street Primary School, Katherine: Bruno, Leilani, Eloise Lawson ...
Should homework be banned?
Social media has sparked into life about whether children should be given homework - should students be freed from this daily chore? Dr Gerald Letendre, a professor of education at Pennsylvania State University, investigates.
Are You Down With or Done With Homework?
These days, nightly homework is a given in American schools, writes Kohn. "Homework isn't limited to those occasions when it seems appropriate and important. Most teachers and administrators aren't saying, 'It may be useful to do this particular project at home,'" he writes. "Rather, the point of departure seems to be, 'We've decided ahead of ...
Why Homework Should Be Banned From Schools
American high school students, in fact, do more homework each week than their peers in the average country in the OECD, a 2014 report found. It's time for an uprising. Already, small rebellions ...
12 Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned
Students spending all this time on homework limits meaningful interactions with family members, stifling those relationships. Parents are also more likely to excuse students from household chores when they have excessive schoolwork, making the home feel less like a team and increasing tension around the house. [7] 8.
Is homework a necessary evil?
Beyond that point, kids don't absorb much useful information, Cooper says. In fact, too much homework can do more harm than good. Researchers have cited drawbacks, including boredom and burnout toward academic material, less time for family and extracurricular activities, lack of sleep and increased stress.
'Why I believe homework should be banned', by one primary school student
They believe that homework is "a remedy against weaknesses". These can all be done at school. They believe it teaches the students responsibility because they have to make sure that they do ...
‎Should homework be banned? on Apple Podcasts
‎Society & Culture · 2019
21 Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned (2024)
Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned. 1. It Contributes to Increased Anxiety. If there's one word that describes middle-school and high-school students, it's anxiety. In my homework statistics article, I cite research showing that 74% of students cite homework as a source of stress.
Why (Most) Homework Should Be Banned
There are plenty of reasons why (most) homework should be banned. I'll start out with some general facts and look at homework in general, then go into some detail about our school. Stanford conducted a study surveying over 4,300 students in 10 high performing high schools in California. More than 70% of the students said they were "often or ...
Should homework be banned?
In this episode of the Play on Words podcast, Beth talks all about play — playing for big kids, playing in the school day, how to set up play for babies, and more. ... Should homework be banned? elementary. Mar 1. Written By Kelly Etz . Does play really matter with Lizzie Assa, play expert, parenting strategist and creator of The Workspace ...
Why Homework Should not be Banned to Children?
And a decision to stop homework at Leichhardts Kegworth Public School has sparked a debate among inner west Sydney parents about whether the policy will help pupils in the long run. Image: A ...
Why Homework Should Be Banned? [6 Reasons]
Why Homework Should Be Banned? [6 Reasons] The arguments opposing and supporting homework have always been there. Whether homework actually solves a purpose is still in research. But homework stressing out the students to the extent of hating school and education is not a myth. With increasing competition, students are getting more and more ...
8 Reasons Why Homework Shouldn't be Banned
5. Self Discipline. 6. Homework gives teachers insight into how students learn best. 7. Homework allows parents to see how their children are doing at school. 8. Homework provides a sense of accomplishment. Students need to practice what they learn.
The Sunday Read: 'Sure, It Won an Oscar. But Is It Criterion?'
Listen and follow The Daily Apple Podcasts | Spotify. In October 2022, amid a flurry of media appearances promoting their film "Tàr," the director Todd Field and the star Cate Blanchett made ...
Five Questions on MLB's Investigation Into Shohei Ohtani, Interpreter
Rule 21(d)(2) warns that those who bet on a game in which they are involved shall be banned permanently. (You may have heard of Shoeless Joe Jackson and Pete Rose.) (You may have heard of Shoeless ...
20 Reasons Why Homework Should Be Banned
These are some of the reasons why homework should be banned -: Homework Restricts A Student's Freedom. No Time For Exercises. No Time To Play Outdoor Games. Often Breaks Students' Confidence. Homework Doing Not An Achievement. Most Homework Creates Bad Habits. Less Time To Spend With Family Members.
The Caitlin Clark Phenomenon
This transcript was created using speech recognition software. While it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. Please review the episode audio before quoting from this ...
Chuck Schumer on His Campaign to Oust Israel's Leader
The Senate majority leader, Chuck Schumer, explains why he decided to speak out against Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister.

Is it time to get rid of homework? Mental health experts weigh in.

The pandemic made the conversation around homework more crucial

'Get organized' ahead of back-to-school

25 Reasons Homework Should Be Banned (Busywork Arguments)

Examples of Homework

Lack of proven benefits

Increased stress

Limited family time

Reduced physical activity

Negative impact on sleep

Reduced creativity and independent thinking

Diminished interest in learning

Inability to pursue personal interests

Excessive workload

Limited time for reflection

Increased pressure on young children

Lack of alignment with real-world skills

Loss of motivation

Disruption of work-life balance

Impact on mental health

Limited time for self-care

Decreased family involvement

Reinforcement of inequalities

Reduced time for play and creativity

Increased cheating and academic dishonesty

Strained teacher-student relationships

Negative impact on family dynamics

Cultural and individual differences

Encouragement of surface-level learning

Related posts:

About The Author

Free Personality Test

Free Memory Test

Free IQ Test

Psychology Resources

Psychology Tests

Nobody knows what the point of homework is

Share this story

Share All sharing options for: Nobody knows what the point of homework is

There’s no consensus on whether homework works

Canceling homework might not do anything for the achievement gap

Not all homework is created equal

Cutting homework has to be part of a larger strategy

Can we protect and profit from the oceans?

Should We Ban Homework?

Bans proposed and implemented in the U.S. and abroad

Refocus on mental health and educate the “whole child”

Research supports a ban for elementary schools

Parents push back, too

Of course, homework has its defenders, especially in the upper grades

You Might Also Like

Schools Are Facing a Teen Sleep Epidemic

Should we ban homework?

Classroom Resources: teachers, explore the diverse themes and subjects covered

Discover more podcasts

Are You Down With or Done With Homework?

The debate over how much schoolwork students should be doing at home has flared again, with one side saying it's too much, the other side saying in our competitive world, it's just not enough.

Homework Policy Still Going Strong

Ed. Magazine

Related Articles

Commencement Marshal Sarah Fiarman: The Principal of the Matter

Making Math “Almost Fun”

Lessons Learned: Zid Mancenido, Ph.D.'22

Why I Think All Schools Should Abolish Homework

More from TIME

More Must-Reads From TIME

You May Also Like

No More Homework: 12 Reasons We Should Get Rid of It Completely

School is already a full-time job.

Homework negatively affects students’ health.

Homework interferes with student’s opportunities to socialize.

Homework hinders students’ chances to learn new things.

Homework lowers students’ enthusiasm for school.

Homework can lower academic performance.

Homework cuts into family time.

Homework is stressful for teachers.

Homework is often irrelevant and punitive.

Homework encourages cheating.

Homework is inequitable.

Other countries have banned homework with great results.