theses and research articles

• Interesting
• Scholarships
• UGC-CARE Journals

11 Differences Between a Thesis and an Article

Table of contents

Differences between a thesis and an article, what is the difference between thesis and dissertation, what is the difference between sci, scie and esci journals, how to become an academic journal reviewer|step by step guide.

Journal article and thesis are two important formats of reports in academia. There are certain differences between the thesis and article. The aim of the thesis is totally different from a journal article. Being a researcher , understanding the differences between both kind of academic writing is very essential.

Courtesy: Elsevier.com

Hope, this article helps you to distinguish the difference between a thesis and an article.

• Difference between
• Peer Reviewed Journals

Publish in Nature Journal: A Step-by-Step Guide for Researchers

Quad fellowship for master’s and doctoral students, 14 websites to download research paper for free – 2024.

Really it is very very important for a Researcher. Without knowledge of writing an article and thesis research is a dilemma .It is fruitless. Many Many Thanks for your Support in this regard.

[…] 11 Differences Between a Thesis and an Article […]

[…] Also Read: 11 Differences Between a Thesis and an Article | iLovePhD […]

LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Email Subscription

iLovePhD is a research education website to know updated research-related information. It helps researchers to find top journals for publishing research articles and get an easy manual for research tools. The main aim of this website is to help Ph.D. scholars who are working in various domains to get more valuable ideas to carry out their research. Learn the current groundbreaking research activities around the world, love the process of getting a Ph.D.

WhatsApp Channel

Join iLovePhD WhatsApp Channel Now!

Contact us: [email protected]

Copyright © 2019-2024 - iLovePhD

• Artificial intelligence

ARDA Conference

ARDA helps students and research scholars in attending conferences and journal publication

Home » Article Writing Services » Difference Between Thesis and Research Article

Difference Between Thesis and Research Article

Thesis writing

The word dissertation is derived from the Latin word dissertation, which means “path”. In some countries, dissertations are also referred to as a thesis. According to the Oxford Dictionary, dissertations can also be defined as long essays on a particular subject or topic written especially for a college degree. Thesis writing can vary in scope, length, and nature, but the main aim and objective remain the same.

Research Article

A Research Article , on the other hand, could be defined as any original and non-plagiarism research. The term ‘research’ refers to the repetition of the search (examination). Repetitive research in various directions to prove the central question of the thesis is generally called ‘research’. A research article will usually, if not always, include the central question of the thesis. There are generally two types of research papers, one being qualitative and the other quantitative.

Differences Between Thesis & Research Article – In Truest Academic Sense

• A thesis is all about a single scholarly statement, and sometimes maybe it’s a summary. The existence of a thesis opens up avenues of inquiry into an infinity of speculative possibilities such as antitheses.
• While the thesis question opens up the limits of these varying possibilities, the primary focus of inquiry persists, remaining unchanged .
• A research article consists of both speculative variables (the majority of which are nullified) and constants that aim to prove the central question of the thesis or the major objective of the research.
• In its purest form, the question that a thesis hopes to answer has a sort of legality in which the outcome warrants the means potentially. Article writing involves explaining the central thesis and constitutes a process of methodological demonstration of this assertion.

Quantitative and qualitative disciplines implement this methodology in various ways depending on the provisions of that particular field. ARDA conference portal helps in writing research articles and thesis writing.

Primary Differences Between Thesis & Research Paper

There are numerous contrasts between a thesis and a research article. Some of these are major differences, while others are more nuanced or subtle. The differences described here come from classical European Enlightenment thought. There are many relevant and alternative defining paradigms and therefore, differences. While only the classicist strain will be explained here, other modes of definitions, differences and similarities will also be presented.

Primary Focus

A thesis is concerned with the central question or statement of a scientific hypothesis that results in further investigation, while a research paper is concerned with proving that central argument.

• The thesis concerns both the possibilities through the formation of numerous antitheses and the end of all the possibilities by the cancellation of all these antitheses.
• The research paper is all about proving the central statement of the thesis and accumulating proof and data to validate the same, investigating other possibilities and invalidating them and presenting speculation on prospective options for the question, which is the central part of the thesis.
• To be accurate, the research paper is all about explaining and proving the thesis.

Length Of The Argument

• The thesis is usually formed by the in-depth original reflection that puts forward a proposition or statement, but the research paper requires a tenacious resilience on the part of the researcher to prove the primary inquisition.
• The latter is a lengthy, drawn-out process in which there is the gathering of evidence, the lifting and cancellation of various other possibilities and the application of theories and evidence to the central question of research. All of this is done to prove the thesis.
• The research paper could be called an elaboration and augmentation of the primary thesis.

Problem Statement

• The term ‘thesis’ is often used in place of the term ‘research article’. This is, however, a rhetorical discrepancy in which a part is substituted for a whole.
• A thesis statement is generally part of the research paper and not the other way around.
• A thesis statement does not include the methodology. A research article illustrates this methodology and offers insight into whether it is of the quantitative or qualitative sort.
• A thesis statement is an end in itself. A research article, meanwhile, although intended to expose and explain the thesis, clearly opens up all the avenues of research that the online thesis statement holds in potentia.
• If the vast majority of these lines are canceled and proven to be “incorrect”, there are few possibilities that still refuse to go away.
• These could, in the future, go into the formation of alternative discursive structures in which the central question of the thesis is no longer valid.
• The research article seen in its “flow”, is also the end of the central thesis statement. Nevertheless, it is generally rich in theoretical and empirical information and detail.
• The thesis statement addresses a single question, while the research article raises several questions, albeit related to the central theme. Some of these questions are canceled and others remain the indicators of alternative discourse.

A research article usually consists of the thesis, but this is not always the case. The research article may be on the part of the thesis question and may have stand-alone validity. Are you confused about your research article writing and journals ? Inquiry or Comment us below we help in article writing services .

3 Replies to “Difference Between Thesis and Research Article”

I’m looking to have my dissertation published in a journal, however, I need help with writing a research article and wish to know if you can help.

Thanks for your inquiry. Our concerned coordinator will contact you shortly. Do check your spam folder if it doesn’t arrive in your inbox.

Fruitful information

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

WhatsApp us

• Enroll & Pay

OATD.org provides open access graduate theses and dissertations published around the world. Metadata (information about the theses) comes from over 1100 colleges, universities, and research institutions. OATD currently indexes 6,654,285 theses and dissertations.

• Hirsh Health Sciences
• Webster Veterinary

Guide to Scholarly Articles

• What is a Scholarly Article?
• Scholarly vs. Popular vs. Trade Articles

Types of Scholarly Articles

Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods articles, why does this matter.

• Anatomy of Scholarly Articles
• Tips for Reading Scholarly Articles

Scholarly articles come in many different formats each with their own function in the scholarly conversation. The following are a few of the major types of scholarly articles you are likely to encounter as you become a part of the conversation. Identifying the different types of scholarly articles and knowing their function will help you become a better researcher.

Original/Empirical Studies

• Note: Empirical studies can be subdivided into qualitative studies, quantitative studies, or mixed methods studies. See below for more information  
• Usefulness for research:  Empirical studies are useful because they provide current original research on a topic which may contain a hypothesis or interpretation to advance or to disprove. 

Literature Reviews

• Distinguishing characteristic:  Literature reviews survey and analyze a clearly delaminated body of scholarly literature.  
• Usefulness for research: Literature reviews are useful as a way to quickly get up to date on a particular topic of research.

Theoretical Articles

• Distinguishing characteristic:  Theoretical articles draw on existing scholarship to improve upon or offer a new theoretical perspective on a given topic.
• Usefulness for research:  Theoretical articles are useful because they provide a theoretical framework you can apply to your own research.

Methodological Articles

• Distinguishing characteristic:  Methodological articles draw on existing scholarship to improve or offer new methodologies for exploring a given topic.
• Usefulness for research:  Methodological articles are useful because they provide a methodologies you can apply to your own research.

Case Studies

• Distinguishing characteristic:  Case studies focus on individual examples or instances of a phenomenon to illustrate a research problem or a a solution to a research problem.
• Usefulness for research:  Case studies are useful because they provide information about a research problem or data for analysis.

Book Reviews

• Distinguishing characteristic:  Book reviews provide summaries and evaluations of individual books.
• Usefulness for research:  Book reviews are useful because they provide summaries and evaluations of individual books relevant to your research.

Adapted from the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association : the official guide to APA style. (Sixth edition.). (2013). American Psychological Association.

Qualitative articles  ask "why" questions where as  quantitative  articles  ask "how many/how much?" questions. These approaches are are not mutually exclusive. In fact, many articles combine the two in a  mixed-methods  approach. 

We can think of these different kinds of scholarly articles as different tools designed for different tasks. What research task do you need to accomplish? Do you need to get up to date on a give topic? Find a literature review. Do you need to find a hypothesis to test or to extend? Find an empirical study. Do you need to explore methodologies? Find a methodological article.

• << Previous: Scholarly vs. Popular vs. Trade Articles
• Next: Anatomy of Scholarly Articles >>
• Last Updated: Aug 23, 2023 8:53 AM
• URL: https://researchguides.library.tufts.edu/scholarly-articles

• Privacy Policy

Buy Me a Coffee

Home » Thesis – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

Thesis – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

Table of contents.

Definition:

Thesis is a scholarly document that presents a student’s original research and findings on a particular topic or question. It is usually written as a requirement for a graduate degree program and is intended to demonstrate the student’s mastery of the subject matter and their ability to conduct independent research.

History of Thesis

The concept of a thesis can be traced back to ancient Greece, where it was used as a way for students to demonstrate their knowledge of a particular subject. However, the modern form of the thesis as a scholarly document used to earn a degree is a relatively recent development.

The origin of the modern thesis can be traced back to medieval universities in Europe. During this time, students were required to present a “disputation” in which they would defend a particular thesis in front of their peers and faculty members. These disputations served as a way to demonstrate the student’s mastery of the subject matter and were often the final requirement for earning a degree.

In the 17th century, the concept of the thesis was formalized further with the creation of the modern research university. Students were now required to complete a research project and present their findings in a written document, which would serve as the basis for their degree.

The modern thesis as we know it today has evolved over time, with different disciplines and institutions adopting their own standards and formats. However, the basic elements of a thesis – original research, a clear research question, a thorough review of the literature, and a well-argued conclusion – remain the same.

Structure of Thesis

The structure of a thesis may vary slightly depending on the specific requirements of the institution, department, or field of study, but generally, it follows a specific format.

Here’s a breakdown of the structure of a thesis:

This is the first page of the thesis that includes the title of the thesis, the name of the author, the name of the institution, the department, the date, and any other relevant information required by the institution.

This is a brief summary of the thesis that provides an overview of the research question, methodology, findings, and conclusions.

This page provides a list of all the chapters and sections in the thesis and their page numbers.

Introduction

This chapter provides an overview of the research question, the context of the research, and the purpose of the study. The introduction should also outline the methodology and the scope of the research.

Literature Review

This chapter provides a critical analysis of the relevant literature on the research topic. It should demonstrate the gap in the existing knowledge and justify the need for the research.

Methodology

This chapter provides a detailed description of the research methods used to gather and analyze data. It should explain the research design, the sampling method, data collection techniques, and data analysis procedures.

This chapter presents the findings of the research. It should include tables, graphs, and charts to illustrate the results.

This chapter interprets the results and relates them to the research question. It should explain the significance of the findings and their implications for the research topic.

This chapter summarizes the key findings and the main conclusions of the research. It should also provide recommendations for future research.

This section provides a list of all the sources cited in the thesis. The citation style may vary depending on the requirements of the institution or the field of study.

This section includes any additional material that supports the research, such as raw data, survey questionnaires, or other relevant documents.

How to write Thesis

Here are some steps to help you write a thesis:

• Choose a Topic: The first step in writing a thesis is to choose a topic that interests you and is relevant to your field of study. You should also consider the scope of the topic and the availability of resources for research.
• Develop a Research Question: Once you have chosen a topic, you need to develop a research question that you will answer in your thesis. The research question should be specific, clear, and feasible.
• Conduct a Literature Review: Before you start your research, you need to conduct a literature review to identify the existing knowledge and gaps in the field. This will help you refine your research question and develop a research methodology.
• Develop a Research Methodology: Once you have refined your research question, you need to develop a research methodology that includes the research design, data collection methods, and data analysis procedures.
• Collect and Analyze Data: After developing your research methodology, you need to collect and analyze data. This may involve conducting surveys, interviews, experiments, or analyzing existing data.
• Write the Thesis: Once you have analyzed the data, you need to write the thesis. The thesis should follow a specific structure that includes an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, and references.
• Edit and Proofread: After completing the thesis, you need to edit and proofread it carefully. You should also have someone else review it to ensure that it is clear, concise, and free of errors.
• Submit the Thesis: Finally, you need to submit the thesis to your academic advisor or committee for review and evaluation.

Example of Thesis

Example of Thesis template for Students:

Title of Thesis

Table of Contents:

Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter 2: Literature Review

Chapter 3: Research Methodology

Chapter 4: Results

Chapter 5: Discussion

Chapter 6: Conclusion

References:

Appendices:

Note: That’s just a basic template, but it should give you an idea of the structure and content that a typical thesis might include. Be sure to consult with your department or supervisor for any specific formatting requirements they may have. Good luck with your thesis!

Application of Thesis

Thesis is an important academic document that serves several purposes. Here are some of the applications of thesis:

• Academic Requirement: A thesis is a requirement for many academic programs, especially at the graduate level. It is an essential component of the evaluation process and demonstrates the student’s ability to conduct original research and contribute to the knowledge in their field.
• Career Advancement: A thesis can also help in career advancement. Employers often value candidates who have completed a thesis as it demonstrates their research skills, critical thinking abilities, and their dedication to their field of study.
• Publication : A thesis can serve as a basis for future publications in academic journals, books, or conference proceedings. It provides the researcher with an opportunity to present their research to a wider audience and contribute to the body of knowledge in their field.
• Personal Development: Writing a thesis is a challenging task that requires time, dedication, and perseverance. It provides the student with an opportunity to develop critical thinking, research, and writing skills that are essential for their personal and professional development.
• Impact on Society: The findings of a thesis can have an impact on society by addressing important issues, providing insights into complex problems, and contributing to the development of policies and practices.

Purpose of Thesis

The purpose of a thesis is to present original research findings in a clear and organized manner. It is a formal document that demonstrates a student’s ability to conduct independent research and contribute to the knowledge in their field of study. The primary purposes of a thesis are:

• To Contribute to Knowledge: The main purpose of a thesis is to contribute to the knowledge in a particular field of study. By conducting original research and presenting their findings, the student adds new insights and perspectives to the existing body of knowledge.
• To Demonstrate Research Skills: A thesis is an opportunity for the student to demonstrate their research skills. This includes the ability to formulate a research question, design a research methodology, collect and analyze data, and draw conclusions based on their findings.
• To Develop Critical Thinking: Writing a thesis requires critical thinking and analysis. The student must evaluate existing literature and identify gaps in the field, as well as develop and defend their own ideas.
• To Provide Evidence of Competence : A thesis provides evidence of the student’s competence in their field of study. It demonstrates their ability to apply theoretical concepts to real-world problems, and their ability to communicate their ideas effectively.
• To Facilitate Career Advancement : Completing a thesis can help the student advance their career by demonstrating their research skills and dedication to their field of study. It can also provide a basis for future publications, presentations, or research projects.

When to Write Thesis

The timing for writing a thesis depends on the specific requirements of the academic program or institution. In most cases, the opportunity to write a thesis is typically offered at the graduate level, but there may be exceptions.

Generally, students should plan to write their thesis during the final year of their graduate program. This allows sufficient time for conducting research, analyzing data, and writing the thesis. It is important to start planning the thesis early and to identify a research topic and research advisor as soon as possible.

In some cases, students may be able to write a thesis as part of an undergraduate program or as an independent research project outside of an academic program. In such cases, it is important to consult with faculty advisors or mentors to ensure that the research is appropriately designed and executed.

It is important to note that the process of writing a thesis can be time-consuming and requires a significant amount of effort and dedication. It is important to plan accordingly and to allocate sufficient time for conducting research, analyzing data, and writing the thesis.

Characteristics of Thesis

The characteristics of a thesis vary depending on the specific academic program or institution. However, some general characteristics of a thesis include:

• Originality : A thesis should present original research findings or insights. It should demonstrate the student’s ability to conduct independent research and contribute to the knowledge in their field of study.
• Clarity : A thesis should be clear and concise. It should present the research question, methodology, findings, and conclusions in a logical and organized manner. It should also be well-written, with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
• Research-Based: A thesis should be based on rigorous research, which involves collecting and analyzing data from various sources. The research should be well-designed, with appropriate research methods and techniques.
• Evidence-Based : A thesis should be based on evidence, which means that all claims made in the thesis should be supported by data or literature. The evidence should be properly cited using appropriate citation styles.
• Critical Thinking: A thesis should demonstrate the student’s ability to critically analyze and evaluate information. It should present the student’s own ideas and arguments, and engage with existing literature in the field.
• Academic Style : A thesis should adhere to the conventions of academic writing. It should be well-structured, with clear headings and subheadings, and should use appropriate academic language.

Advantages of Thesis

There are several advantages to writing a thesis, including:

• Development of Research Skills: Writing a thesis requires extensive research and analytical skills. It helps to develop the student’s research skills, including the ability to formulate research questions, design and execute research methodologies, collect and analyze data, and draw conclusions based on their findings.
• Contribution to Knowledge: Writing a thesis provides an opportunity for the student to contribute to the knowledge in their field of study. By conducting original research, they can add new insights and perspectives to the existing body of knowledge.
• Preparation for Future Research: Completing a thesis prepares the student for future research projects. It provides them with the necessary skills to design and execute research methodologies, analyze data, and draw conclusions based on their findings.
• Career Advancement: Writing a thesis can help to advance the student’s career. It demonstrates their research skills and dedication to their field of study, and provides a basis for future publications, presentations, or research projects.
• Personal Growth: Completing a thesis can be a challenging and rewarding experience. It requires dedication, hard work, and perseverance. It can help the student to develop self-confidence, independence, and a sense of accomplishment.

Limitations of Thesis

There are also some limitations to writing a thesis, including:

• Time and Resources: Writing a thesis requires a significant amount of time and resources. It can be a time-consuming and expensive process, as it may involve conducting original research, analyzing data, and producing a lengthy document.
• Narrow Focus: A thesis is typically focused on a specific research question or topic, which may limit the student’s exposure to other areas within their field of study.
• Limited Audience: A thesis is usually only read by a small number of people, such as the student’s thesis advisor and committee members. This limits the potential impact of the research findings.
• Lack of Real-World Application : Some thesis topics may be highly theoretical or academic in nature, which may limit their practical application in the real world.
• Pressure and Stress : Writing a thesis can be a stressful and pressure-filled experience, as it may involve meeting strict deadlines, conducting original research, and producing a high-quality document.
• Potential for Isolation: Writing a thesis can be a solitary experience, as the student may spend a significant amount of time working independently on their research and writing.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Thesis Outline – Example, Template and Writing...

Research Paper Conclusion – Writing Guide and...

Appendices – Writing Guide, Types and Examples

Research Report – Example, Writing Guide and...

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Scope of the Research – Writing Guide and...

What is a Master’s Thesis: A Guide for Students 

A master’s thesis is an academic research output that is expected to showcase a student’s competence in a higher level of research as compared to an undergraduate one. The primary objective of a master’s thesis is to assess a student on the depth of their understanding, knowledge, and competence on the subject of their choice. It provides a scholarly and research foundation for students to build on if they are interested in pursuing higher academic degrees and professional work. 

Benefits of Writing a Master’s Thesis  

Undertaking a master’s thesis program enhances your career and academic prospects. In the academic sphere, those who have completed a master’s thesis program are in a more advantageous position when they seek admission to a PhD program. Research-focused disciplines, in particular, usually favour students who have completed their master’s thesis. Opting for a master’s thesis program also gives researchers the opportunity to pursue their interest area through study and research. Further, through the process of thesis writing, students also develop their skills in writing, putting forth an informed argument and developing research questions. A well-developed thesis can also be published as a research paper in peer-reviewed journals, thereby enhancing future academic and career prospects.  

Thesis Masters and Non-thesis Masters Program: Differences   

It is critical to note that all master’s programs do not have a thesis requirement. At the same time, some programs allow students to choose between a thesis and a non-thesis master’s program. In a thesis Master’s program, you are required to prepare a comprehensive scholarly paper under the advice of a faculty member that demonstrates the knowledge, skills, and critical thinking that you have developed during the program. Hence, it is a mandatory requirement for the completion of your degree. However, in a non-thesis master’s program, you are not expected to write a thesis. You are nevertheless required to take additional classes and, by the end of the program, complete a Capstone project, a comprehensive exam, or a summary project. 

Master’s thesis and PhD Dissertation: Differences  

A Master’s thesis is very different from a PhD dissertation, though often, the words thesis and dissertation are used interchangeably not only by students but also by the wider academic community and publishers.   

• A PhD dissertation is an original research by the doctoral candidate that contributes something new to the existing body of knowledge in the field, such as new theories and information. This should not have been published previously. In contrast, a master’s thesis is a scholarly paper that involves original testing of ideas and demonstrates the knowledge and skills the student has acquired and built during the master’s program.  
• A master’s thesis deals or engages more with existing research or secondary knowledge, though depending on the subject, there can be research of primary sources as well. Here, the student certainly has to bring in their critical and analytical skills. The sources of data will generally be research papers, scholarly books, journal articles, government reports, statistics, and so on. However, in a PhD dissertation, the focus is on generating new and novel data, resulting in an original piece of work that external subject experts will evaluate. Hence, apart from the sources of data mentioned for the Master’s thesis, the significant component of sources of data for PhD dissertation will be generated from interviews, focus groups, surveys, laboratory experiments and so on. 
• A master’s thesis is presented at the end of the master’s program, which is about one or two years. The thesis is a critical part of completing the degree. A PhD dissertation takes a considerable amount of time, ranging from 4 to 7 years. By this time, the candidate should have completed, apart from their dissertation, other requirements such as fulfilling a set of coursework, attending seminars/ conferences, presenting papers at seminars and publishing papers in peer-reviewed journals. 
• The master’s thesis is completed and submitted at the end of the master’s program. The PhD dissertation is presented to earn the PhD degree. 
• Another major difference between the two is the length. While a master’s thesis may be between 50 and 100 pages, the Ph.D. dissertation is more detailed, in-depth, and comprehensive, with a length of up to 400 pages. 

While all Master’s programs do not have a thesis requirement, completing a thesis provides a scholarly and research foundation for students to pursue higher academic degrees and professional work. A master’s thesis program can be a valuable experience for students interested in pursuing higher academic degrees and professional work in research-focused disciplines.

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.   

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed.  Try for free or  upgrade to Paperpal Prime   starting at US$19 a month  to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.   Experience the future of academic writing –  Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!    

Related Reads:

• How to Make Your Thesis Supervision Work for You
• Research Outlines: How to Write An Introduction Section in Minutes with Paperpal Copilot
• How to Paraphrase Research Papers Effectively
• What is a Literature Review? How to Write It (with Examples)

Authorship in Academia: Ghost, Guest, and Gift Authorship

Quillbot review: features, pricing, and free alternatives, you may also like, how to write an essay introduction (with examples)..., similarity checks: the author’s guide to plagiarism and..., should you use ai tools like chatgpt for..., what are the benefits of generative ai for..., how to avoid plagiarism tips and advice for..., plagiarism checkers vs. ai content detection: navigating the..., plagiarism prevention: why you need a plagiarism check..., how long should a chapter be, how to cite social media sources in academic writing , what is a literature review how to write....

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Dissertation

How to Write a Thesis or Dissertation Introduction

Published on September 7, 2022 by Tegan George and Shona McCombes. Revised on November 21, 2023.

The introduction is the first section of your thesis or dissertation , appearing right after the table of contents . Your introduction draws your reader in, setting the stage for your research with a clear focus, purpose, and direction on a relevant topic .

Your introduction should include:

• Your topic, in context: what does your reader need to know to understand your thesis dissertation?
• Your focus and scope: what specific aspect of the topic will you address?
• The relevance of your research: how does your work fit into existing studies on your topic?
• Your questions and objectives: what does your research aim to find out, and how?
• An overview of your structure: what does each section contribute to the overall aim?

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

How to start your introduction, topic and context, focus and scope, relevance and importance, questions and objectives, overview of the structure, thesis introduction example, introduction checklist, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about introductions.

Although your introduction kicks off your dissertation, it doesn’t have to be the first thing you write — in fact, it’s often one of the very last parts to be completed (just before your abstract ).

It’s a good idea to write a rough draft of your introduction as you begin your research, to help guide you. If you wrote a research proposal , consider using this as a template, as it contains many of the same elements. However, be sure to revise your introduction throughout the writing process, making sure it matches the content of your ensuing sections.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Begin by introducing your dissertation topic and giving any necessary background information. It’s important to contextualize your research and generate interest. Aim to show why your topic is timely or important. You may want to mention a relevant news item, academic debate, or practical problem.

After a brief introduction to your general area of interest, narrow your focus and define the scope of your research.

You can narrow this down in many ways, such as by:

• Geographical area
• Time period
• Demographics or communities
• Themes or aspects of the topic

It’s essential to share your motivation for doing this research, as well as how it relates to existing work on your topic. Further, you should also mention what new insights you expect it will contribute.

Start by giving a brief overview of the current state of research. You should definitely cite the most relevant literature, but remember that you will conduct a more in-depth survey of relevant sources in the literature review section, so there’s no need to go too in-depth in the introduction.

Depending on your field, the importance of your research might focus on its practical application (e.g., in policy or management) or on advancing scholarly understanding of the topic (e.g., by developing theories or adding new empirical data). In many cases, it will do both.

Ultimately, your introduction should explain how your thesis or dissertation:

• Helps solve a practical or theoretical problem
• Addresses a gap in the literature
• Builds on existing research
• Proposes a new understanding of your topic

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

Perhaps the most important part of your introduction is your questions and objectives, as it sets up the expectations for the rest of your thesis or dissertation. How you formulate your research questions and research objectives will depend on your discipline, topic, and focus, but you should always clearly state the central aim of your research.

If your research aims to test hypotheses , you can formulate them here. Your introduction is also a good place for a conceptual framework that suggests relationships between variables .

• Conduct surveys to collect data on students’ levels of knowledge, understanding, and positive/negative perceptions of government policy.
• Determine whether attitudes to climate policy are associated with variables such as age, gender, region, and social class.
• Conduct interviews to gain qualitative insights into students’ perspectives and actions in relation to climate policy.

To help guide your reader, end your introduction with an outline  of the structure of the thesis or dissertation to follow. Share a brief summary of each chapter, clearly showing how each contributes to your central aims. However, be careful to keep this overview concise: 1-2 sentences should be enough.

I. Introduction

Human language consists of a set of vowels and consonants which are combined to form words. During the speech production process, thoughts are converted into spoken utterances to convey a message. The appropriate words and their meanings are selected in the mental lexicon (Dell & Burger, 1997). This pre-verbal message is then grammatically coded, during which a syntactic representation of the utterance is built.

Speech, language, and voice disorders affect the vocal cords, nerves, muscles, and brain structures, which result in a distorted language reception or speech production (Sataloff & Hawkshaw, 2014). The symptoms vary from adding superfluous words and taking pauses to hoarseness of the voice, depending on the type of disorder (Dodd, 2005). However, distortions of the speech may also occur as a result of a disease that seems unrelated to speech, such as multiple sclerosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

This study aims to determine which acoustic parameters are suitable for the automatic detection of exacerbations in patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by investigating which aspects of speech differ between COPD patients and healthy speakers and which aspects differ between COPD patients in exacerbation and stable COPD patients.

Checklist: Introduction

I have introduced my research topic in an engaging way.

I have provided necessary context to help the reader understand my topic.

I have clearly specified the focus of my research.

I have shown the relevance and importance of the dissertation topic .

I have clearly stated the problem or question that my research addresses.

I have outlined the specific objectives of the research .

I have provided an overview of the dissertation’s structure .

You've written a strong introduction for your thesis or dissertation. Use the other checklists to continue improving your dissertation.

If you want to know more about AI for academic writing, AI tools, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

Research bias

• Survivorship bias
• Self-serving bias
• Availability heuristic
• Halo effect
• Hindsight bias
• Deep learning
• Generative AI
• Machine learning
• Reinforcement learning
• Supervised vs. unsupervised learning

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:

• A hook to catch the reader’s interest
• Relevant background on the topic
• Details of your research problem

and your problem statement

• A thesis statement or research question
• Sometimes an overview of the paper

Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.

This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .

Research objectives describe what you intend your research project to accomplish.

They summarize the approach and purpose of the project and help to focus your research.

Your objectives should appear in the introduction of your research paper , at the end of your problem statement .

Scope of research is determined at the beginning of your research process , prior to the data collection stage. Sometimes called “scope of study,” your scope delineates what will and will not be covered in your project. It helps you focus your work and your time, ensuring that you’ll be able to achieve your goals and outcomes.

Defining a scope can be very useful in any research project, from a research proposal to a thesis or dissertation . A scope is needed for all types of research: quantitative , qualitative , and mixed methods .

To define your scope of research, consider the following:

• Budget constraints or any specifics of grant funding
• Your proposed timeline and duration
• Specifics about your population of study, your proposed sample size , and the research methodology you’ll pursue
• Any inclusion and exclusion criteria
• Any anticipated control , extraneous , or confounding variables that could bias your research if not accounted for properly.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

George, T. & McCombes, S. (2023, November 21). How to Write a Thesis or Dissertation Introduction. Scribbr. Retrieved March 20, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/introduction-structure/

Is this article helpful?

Tegan George

Other students also liked, how to choose a dissertation topic | 8 steps to follow, how to write an abstract | steps & examples, unlimited academic ai-proofreading.

✔ Document error-free in 5minutes ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Home » Education » What is the Difference Between Thesis and Research Paper

What is the Difference Between Thesis and Research Paper

The main difference between thesis and research paper is that thesis is a long academic paper that typically serves as the final project for a university degree, while research paper is a piece of academic writing on a particular topic.

In brief, both thesis and research paper are types of academic writing students need to complete in their academic life. While there are many similarities between the two, including the use of academic writing and structure, they are not the same. 

Key Areas Covered

1.  What is a Thesis       – Definition, Features 2.  What is a Research Paper      – Definition, Features 3.  Difference Between Thesis and Research Paper     – Comparison of Key Differences

What is a Thesis

A thesis is a long paper that typically serves as the final project for a university degree. Submitting a thesis is generally required for completing undergraduate honours, masters , and  doctoral degrees . The theses are very long and may contain hundreds of pages. They are also scholarly in nature and allows students to contribute valuable research in their field of study.

Moreover, a major part of a thesis work involves research and writing. It generally has advanced  research design  and analysis. When writing a thesis, the students will have to prove or disapprove a  hypothesis , and their conclusions have to be backed by extensive research and an insightful, learned description of how they got to that conclusion. In some degree programs, students also have to perform an oral defence of the thesis paper in front of a panel of experts.

Components of a Thesis

These are the components you will usually find in a thesis paper.

• Title Page                       
• Abstract           
• Table of Contents           
• List of Figures
• List of Tables           
• Introduction           
• Methods           
• Discussion             
• Conclusions
• Recommendations           
• Acknowledgements
• References             

What is a Research Paper

A research paper is a type of academic writing that involves research, source evaluation, critical thinking, organization, and composition. Moreover, through a research paper, students can explore, interpret, and evaluate sources related to a particular topic. In fact, primary and secondary sources are very important components of a research paper. But it’s important to note that a research paper is not just a summary of a topic using primary and secondary sources. It’s not just an opinion essay or an expository essay that contains the writer’s opinions and views, either. A research paper is a type of writing that requires evaluating different sources and interpreting the information of these sources through one’s own lens. Furthermore, the main purpose of this type of writing is to offer a unique perspective on a topic analyzing and evaluating what others have already said about it.

In addition, there are different types of research papers. Argumentative research papers and analytical research papers are two of the main types of research papers.

Difference Between Thesis and Research Paper

A thesis or dissertation is a long academic paper that typically serves as the final project for a university degree while a research paper is a type of academic writing that involves research, source evaluation, critical thinking, organization, and composition.

In an Academic Context

In an academic context, students may be required to write research papers for assignments and homework, but a thesis is usually the final project.

A thesis tends to be longer than a research paper; in fact, a thesis can take many months, sometimes years, to complete.

Supervision

The thesis is written under the supervision of one or more academic supervisors whereas research papers usually do not have supervisors.

Students have to complete a thesis in order to complete their degree, whereas students write research papers to expand their knowledge.

In brief, the main difference between thesis and research paper is that thesis is a long research paper that typically serves as the final project for a university degree, while a research paper is a piece of academic writing on a particular topic. Moreover, in an academic context, students may be required to write research papers for assignments and homework. But the thesis is usually the final project.

1. Stute, Martin. “ How to Write Your Thesis .” Columbia University. 2. “ Genre and the Research Paper .” Purdue Writing Lab.

Image Courtesy:

1. “ Research Paper ” (CC BY-SA 3.0) By Nick Youngson via Alpha Stock Images 

About the Author: Hasa

Hasanthi is a seasoned content writer and editor with over 8 years of experience. Armed with a BA degree in English and a knack for digital marketing, she explores her passions for literature, history, culture, and food through her engaging and informative writing.

​You May Also Like These

Leave a reply cancel reply.

• Proceedings Proposal
• Abstract Book Proposal
• Conference Issue Proposal
• Publication Newsletters & Alerts

Thesis vs Journal Article: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the world of academia, two prominent forms of scholarly writing are the Thesis and the Journal Article . While both contribute to the advancement of knowledge and showcase research skills, they have distinct characteristics and serve different purposes. Understanding the differences between a thesis and a journal article is crucial for researchers, scholars, and students. In this article, we will provide a detailed and insightful comparison of these two forms of academic writing, examining their purpose, structure, audience, and publication process.

A thesis serves as a comprehensive demonstration of a student’s ability to conduct independent research, analyze data, and contribute original insights to their field of study. Its primary purpose is to fulfill the requirements for the completion of a degree, whether it be a master’s or a doctoral program. A thesis delves deep into a specific research problem, addressing gaps in existing knowledge and making a unique contribution to the field.

On the other hand, a journal article focuses on the dissemination of research findings to the wider academic community. Its purpose is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge, engage in scholarly discourse, and facilitate further research. Journal articles are typically more specific in scope, targeting a particular research question or hypothesis, and highlighting the significance of the findings within the context of the field.

Thesis and journal articles follow different structures to fulfill their respective purposes.

A thesis typically consists of several chapters, including an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. These chapters are interconnected, forming a cohesive narrative that showcases the student’s research journey. Additionally, a thesis may include supplementary sections such as an abstract, acknowledgments, and appendices. The structure of a thesis allows for an extensive exploration of the research problem, thorough analysis of the findings, and comprehensive discussion of their implications.

In contrast, a journal article adheres to a more concise and standardized structure. It typically includes an abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. Journal articles are focused and aim to present the research in a clear and concise manner within the limited word count set by the target journal. The structure of a journal article emphasizes brevity, with a specific focus on the key findings and their implications.

Audience and Publication

Theses and journal articles differ in their target audience and publication process.

Theses are primarily intended for academic evaluation and examination. They are typically assessed by a committee of professors or experts in the field. Theses contribute to the existing body of knowledge within a specific discipline, but they are not usually published in academic journals. While some theses may be made available through institutional repositories, their primary audience is the academic community within the student’s institution.

Journal articles, on the other hand, target a broader audience of researchers, scholars, and practitioners in the field. They undergo a rigorous peer-review process, where experts in the field assess the quality, validity, and contribution of the research. Successful publication in a reputable journal allows researchers to share their findings with the wider academic community, receive feedback, and contribute to ongoing scholarly discussions.

Length and Depth

Another significant difference between theses and journal articles lies in their length and depth.

Theses are typically longer and more extensive in terms of content. They require students to conduct comprehensive research, provide detailed literature reviews, and present thorough analyses. The length of a thesis can vary depending on the field and degree level, ranging from tens to hundreds of pages. This length allows for an in-depth exploration of the research problem and the incorporation of relevant theoretical frameworks and methodologies.

Journal articles, on the other hand, are generally shorter and more concise. They aim to present the research findings within the constraints of the target journal’s word count limitations. Journal articles can range from a few thousand words to around 8,000 words, depending on the journal’s requirements. The brevity of journal articles necessitates clear and focused writing, emphasizing the key findings, their interpretation, and their implications for the field. While the depth of analysis may be more limited compared to a thesis, journal articles are expected to provide sufficient information for other researchers to understand and build upon the presented research.

Citation and Referencing

Both theses and journal articles require accurate and comprehensive referencing to acknowledge the contributions of other researchers and provide credibility to the work.

In the case of theses, referencing is typically more extensive, as they involve comprehensive literature reviews and incorporate a broader range of sources. Theses follow specific citation styles, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago, as per the guidelines provided by the institution or department.

Journal articles also adhere to specific citation styles determined by the target journal. However, the referencing in journal articles tends to be more focused on the specific literature and studies directly relevant to the research question at hand. The emphasis is on providing adequate support for the key arguments and findings presented in the article.

The thesis and the journal article are distinct forms of academic writing, each with its own purpose, structure, audience, and publication process.

Theses demonstrate a student’s research capabilities and contribute original insights to their field of study. They are comprehensive in scope, consisting of several chapters that explore the research problem in depth. Theses are primarily evaluated by academic committees and are not typically published in academic journals.

Journal articles, on the other hand, aim to disseminate research findings to the wider academic community. They focus on specific research questions and contribute to existing knowledge. Journal articles follow a concise and standardized structure, adhering to the guidelines of the target journal. They undergo rigorous peer review and are published in reputable journals to reach a broader audience.

Understanding the distinctions between theses and journal articles enables researchers, scholars, and students to approach each form of writing with the appropriate structure, depth, and style required for their intended purpose and audience. Both theses and journal articles play vital roles in advancing knowledge and fostering academic discourse within their respective fields.

Call for Book Chapter on Breast Cancer

Publish Proceedings

In-text Citation: Referencing Guide

APA Referencing Style: A Quick Guide

IEEE Referencing Style: A Quick Guide

• Publish with AIJR
• Journal Word Template
• Paper Publishing Process
• Editorial Screening Process
• Ethics for Authors
• Guest Posting Blog
• Submit Proceedings Proposal
• Submit Abstract Book Proposal
• Submit Conference Issue Proposal
• Proceedings vs Book of Abstracts
• Proceedings vs Special Issue

Privacy Overview

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Front Psychol

Challenges of Writing Theses and Dissertations in an EFL Context: Genre and Move Analysis of Abstracts Written by Turkish M.A. and Ph.D. Students

Serdar sükan.

1 Department of Modern Languages, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Turkey

Behbood Mohammadzadeh

2 ELT Department, Faculty of Education, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Turkey

Associated Data

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Writing a thesis or dissertation is a challenging procedure as it is one of the requirements of getting a graduate and postgraduate diploma. Writing an abstract like other parts of a thesis or dissertation has its criterion. For this reason, due to globalism, those abstracts written by non-native English speakers may lack some of the features of the abstract genre and move that must be included. This study examines the moves of M.A. and Ph.D. abstracts written by Turkish students between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University. The data consisted of 50 abstracts chosen randomly from the ELT department. For the analysis, Hyland’s five-move model has been used. The study results reveal that 40 abstracts did not follow the five moves that Hyland has put forward. Moreover, it can be stated that the absence of some moves in the abstracts may cause restraint for readers to comprehend these studies in terms of communicative purposes.

Introduction

In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of students willing to get a diploma in their postgraduate fields. Thus, it became necessary to conduct research on the written abstracts as they are considered the essential section of the written theses that will give the reader an idea of the value of the whole dissertation. Hence, to draw attention to its importance and highlight the features that must be included in them, abstract analysis becomes more significant at this point. Especially for those writing their M.A. or Ph.D. abstracts, to guide them on what is needed. Any abstract that is going to be written needs systematic and organized work. The absence of these may lead to comprehension problems and may cause less attention. Poorly written abstracts can have unwanted results and may not receive enough credit or be read. To avoid this, what is expected is that a writer should have all the necessary skills to write good abstracts, which should be seen or understood from the moment one looks at the study. Genres and moves should be included and defined so that every reader understands each step clearly without reading the whole research. Genre is a literary term, and genre analysis is a sort of discourse done to check the reliability of communicative purposes. So, it includes an analysis of the style and text. Abstracts as genres have become a key tool for investigators because they offer them a chance to choose the appropriate study for their investigation ( Chen and Su, 2011 ; Yelland, 2011 ; Piqué-Noguera, 2012 ; Paré, 2017 ; Abdollahpour and Gholami, 2019 ; Anderson et al., 2021 ; Yu, 2021 ).

Moreover, genre referring to abstracts means socially known ways of using language. This is because writing practise is done to give the reader a chance to interpret what the reader could be expected based on what they have read in earlier texts ( Hyland, 2007 ). As Kaya and Yağız (2020) state, publishing research articles in English is the main aspect of academic life. Therefore, writing is a challenging job, and surviving in the academic world is demanding. Thus, it needs to be of good quality with all the features. However, if the writer has no awareness of what is required for writing and how to make it more interesting for the readers, the text written can turn into a disappointment. Belcher (2009) states that the abstract is an important part of work because it gives readers an idea of what it contains and whether it is worth reading. To put it simply, an abstract acts as a communication tool revealing the importance of the article and indicating whether reading the article will enrich scholars. Tanko (2017) claims that abstracts are the key tools to declare the outcomes researchers have found in their studies. Moreover, Salager-Meyer (1994) and Hartley (2003) define the abstract as the core of the article and the first part that encounters the readers of the article. For this reason, Hartley and Betts (2009) highlight the importance of abstracts by pointing out the fact that a well-written abstract increases the possibility of being read if it gives enough information about the article.

This study investigates and analyzes the M.A. and Ph.D. students’ theses abstracts written by EFL Turkish students in the ELT department. As we all know, abstracts are a very significant part of articles, and they are the main part of transferring and reporting the writer’s view. The major concern of this issue is probably the poor writing skills of students’. Since the demand for writing abstracts is increasing, it has become more important to focus on the structure of the information, make discourse and do a genre analysis. Therefore, problems that lie beneath this topic will be examined, analyzed, and solved.

This study aims to analyze how M.A. and Ph.D. students at Cyprus International University (CIU) write their thesis abstracts using a genre-based approach and Hyland’s framework for abstract analysis (2000). Specifically, the study aims to classify the patterns of the moves employed in the abstracts of CIU M.A. and Ph.D. theses, identify the obligatory and optional moves in the research abstracts, and determine the linguistic features, specifically the tense of the verb and the voice of the verb. Furthermore, it aims to classify the pattern of the rhetorical moves employed in the theses abstracts and determine the linguistic features used by the researchers regarding the following: (a) tense of the verb and (b) voice of the verb. The following research questions will be answered through the present study:

• (1) What are the genre-specific rhetorical features of the abstract sections of M.A. and Ph.D. theses written between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University?
• (2) What types of moves are there in the abstract sections of M.A. and Ph.D. theses written between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University?
• (3) What are the obligatory, conventional, and optional moves identified in the abstract sections of M.A. and Ph.D. theses written between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University?
• (4) What are the linguistic features of the abstract sections of M.A. and Ph.D. theses written between the 2009 and 2019 academic years on foreign language education at Cyprus International University?

Theoretical Framework

Abstracts are the most important parts of research reports as they determine the value of the whole manuscript. Therefore, as Male (2018 : 24) states, “abstracts categorized as an academically written genre containing the rhetorical structure or moves”. Writing abstracts can be more challenging than writing the whole report for students or academicians since it requires an awareness of steps or organization. Furthermore, it has to be written systematically and in good organization. According to Othman (2011) , effective abstract writing can be ascribed to many factors. One of the aspects written is organization. Abstracts are important for the growth and prosperity of academics in all fields.

Considering the fact that the English language has become an international language used worldwide, it may carry some obstacles within itself for non-native speakers when they are writing their reports. Especially, when they want to convey their thoughts. This could be one of the reasons Hyland (2016) has pointed out why non-native speakers go through difficulties as the linguistic norms of the target language are different from their mother tongue. Similarly, Brown (2000) has stated that not only writing is a complicated activity but also one needs to have the full competencies.

According to Ren and Li (2011) , genre analysis has to be done to be able to write well or to overcome the challenges of academic writing. For this reason, Al-Zubaidi (2012) , recommended that second language learners’ should receive extra help in comprehending the content, building academic language, and incorporating language skills. Furthermore, Zhu (2004) ; Tardy (2005) , and Tas (2008) pointed out that in the process of writing academic manuscripts, appropriate style should be given in a discoursal environment. To overcome the writing difficulties in the native language and to develop effective academic writing skills studying the genre, analysis is the best.

Due to the fact that examiners or readers are very busy doing their work, most of them limit their search, and they want to know from the first glance whether the manuscript is worth reading or not ( Alhuqbani, 2013 ). For this reason, according to Kossasih (2018) , four reasons make abstracts play a vital role in articles. The first reason is, it gives information that can be easily read or seen. The second reason is that it can guide readers or provide them with a clue as to whether they will finish reading the whole content or not. Third, it gives an outline for readers. Fourth, it offers a summary of the most important ideas and thoughts. According to Walter (2008) , abstract means, “a shortened form of a speech, article, book, etc., giving only the most important facts or ideas.” Bhatia (1993) defined it as “a description or factual summary of the much longer report, and is meant to give the reader an exact and concise knowledge of the full article.”

Moreover, Martín-Martín (2005 : 20) claims that abstracts are written: “to provide the summary of the content of the accompanying article”. Consequently, they all suggest that research article writers should use a series of rhetorical strategies or move structures, and accordingly, there are some popular generic structures to mention. One of them is Bhatia (1993) , suggesting four-move generic structures of abstracts: (1) introducing the purpose, (2) describing the method, (3) summarizing the result, and (4) presenting the conclusion. Another one is proposed by Hyland (2004) , which has a five-move generic structure such as introduction, purpose, method, product, and conclusion moves. In parallel with these, Santos (1996) and Swales and Feak (2004) proposed a five-move generic structure that include (1) background, (2) aim, (3) method, (4) results, and (5) conclusion moves.

According to Kossasih (2018) , the abstract can be contemplated as a genre. Eggins maintains that “Genre is a staged, goal-oriented purposeful activity in which speakers or writers engage as members of our culture. Thus, recognizing the genre of a text has an important role in identifying ways in which a particular text is similar to, reminiscent of, other texts circulating in the culture” ( Eggins, 2004 : 45). Hence, if the genre of the text cannot be identified, it can be seen as problematic. According to Niu (2013) , the genre is a literary term, and genre analysis is a type of discourse that is believed to be done to check the consistency of communicative purposes. Therefore, it involves stylistic text analysis. Abstracts as genres have become an indispensable tool for researchers because it provides them with a chance to select the right article for their research ( Piqué-Noguera, 2012 ).

In 1990, Swales identified genre analysis as parts that constitute moves and linguistic features such as tense, reporting verbs, and the lexical frequency that help writers write a certain text. Thus, it focuses on ideas and meaning and has a sequence of moves that involves communicative function in each move. Therefore, according to his description and identification, all research articles should first identify the topic, then give a review of the previously written articles as the next move, and detect what is not present in the research reports written earlier as a second move, and state the outline of the goals of the study that has been carried out by writing a summary of the outcomes and stating the results as the last move ( Upton and Connor, 2001 ). In line with Upton and Connor (2001) , Ding describes the word move as, “A functional unit in a text, being related to the overall task, which is used to identify the textual regularities in certain genres of writing” ( Ding, 2007 , 20). Having read many articles on the topic, it has been noticed that many experts have defined the term “move analysis” differently. Yelland (2011: 12) defines move analysis as a “piece of text that is evident in the unified functional meaning of a sentence or group of sentences”. Swales (2004) defines it as a shaper of the overall communicative purpose and the rhetorical structure of the genre. El-Dakhs (2018) explains each move as steps. Moreover, some models have been put forward by Bhatia (1993) ; Santos (1996) , and Hyland (2000) . In Bhatia’s version, four moves have been explained, namely, introduction, method, results, and discussion, and this model has been named the IMRD model. In Santos (1996) suggested a new model and put forward five moves, namely, situating the research, presenting the research, describing the methodology, summarizing the findings, and discussing the findings. Finally, in 2000, Hyland gave the final version of the model of moves, which can be detected as similar to Santos’s model because Hyland’s version also included five moves and introduction, purpose, method, product, and conclusion made up the model. Figure 1 demonstrates the three different models that have been explained.

Research article abstracts move models ( El-Dakhs, 2018 ).

According to Can et al. (2016) , moves can be explained or defined as methods that can be used as a guide for the organizing the text to be written. Therefore, all these studies that have been carried out with the aim of evaluating the language of thesis abstracts are to offer different ways and methods of organizing and controlling the language of second language learners’ to prevent discrepancies for communicative purposes. Furthermore, Kanoksilapatham (2007) stated that the move analysis helps the information to be arranged and identifies the type of information that should be included in the text.

This study employs Hyland’s five-move model, examining the moves in thesis abstracts by CIU students. The results of this study can help non-native speakers in writing their abstracts and can contribute to the enrichment of literature in regards to the structure of moves. Moreover, the results are expected to provide deep insight for academicians to improve their writing skills in their future studies.

This study adopts a content analysis method to examine the rhetorical structure of English thesis abstracts. The corpus is the analysis of a total of 50 bachelor theses abstracts at Cyprus International University. The students were selected randomly. The analysis of thesis abstracts involves examining Hyland’s five-move models, which consist of introduction, purpose, method, product, and conclusion.

As shown in Table 1 , Hyland (2000) presents all five moves and their functions. We examined all moves and their functions sequentially in our analysis.

Hyland’s (2000) move model.

To examine abstracts more easily, all 50 abstracts were numbered separately. Hyland’s (2000) model was employed for the analysis. The reason for choosing this model is the fact that it includes five moves, namely, introduction, purpose, methods, product, and conclusion, and his model was used widely in many other research studies. Hyland’s model has been accepted as the most influential in addressing the rhetorical moves in abstracts compared to other suggested models by Santo and Bhatia. In the analysis of move, identification, occurrence, patterns, and the use of tense and voice of moves were also examined. Moreover, the analysis was based on the content or function of the text, and the frequency was used to classify the number of move occurrences in the abstracts. The frequency of occurrence was first recorded and then noted in the tables.

Table 2 lists the frequency of moves found in the abstracts, and as it can be seen from the table, purpose and method have the highest percentages, and conclusion has the lowest percentage. It also shows that only (20%) of these abstracts include complete Hyland’s five moves which are: introduction, purpose, method, product, and conclusion. It has been noticed that most English thesis abstracts (70%) comprised only four rhetorical moves with the absence of a conclusion move. It can be said that all abstracts did not have the conclusion move. The absence of some rhetorical moves in English thesis abstracts may cause communication problems with the readers. Moreover, the readers may have difficulty comprehending the text, and may fail to read it further. This may be a drawback for researchers if their research is not read and recognized in the academic community.

The frequency of moves found in the abstracts.

In Table 3 , the results for tense verb frequency in each move in the abstracts are presented. According to the results obtained, it can be seen that most of the moves in thesis abstracts were written in the present tense. The results showed that the present tense was used more than the past tense in the introduction, purpose, and conclusion in English abstracts. However, the past tense was used more with higher percentages in method and product move. It can also be seen that the future tense was only used in the conclusion move with a low percentage (12%), and it cannot be seen in the other moves.

Verb tense frequency in each move in the abstracts.

In Table 4 , the findings showed that the active voice was preferred in the introduction, purpose, product, and conclusion moves. Nevertheless, the passive voice was used in the method move with a higher percentage compared to the active voice. Furthermore, it is possible to say that a mixture of active and passive voices was used in all moves in the analyzed abstracts.

The voice used in the analyzed abstracts.

In the identification process of move analysis, the belief in rhetorical function was vital for the analysis of RA abstracts to investigate move frequency, move pattern, and the use of tense and voice. To ensure the reliability of this research, coding was used. The Kanoksilapatham’s (2015) criterion for the classification of the frequency of occurrence of each move was employed as the cut-off point.

As shown in Table 1 , all five moves related to Hyland’s (2000) model have been presented. In Table 2 , the frequency of each move differed slightly. The purpose move has been found to have the highest frequency and percentage (96%), followed by the method (92%), product (88%), introduction (74%), and conclusion moves (50%). According to the data obtained, the conclusion move with the least frequency and percentage was an optional move as it was not mentioned in most abstracts. Many researchers preferred not to include this move in their abstracts as this showed they did not give enough importance to it. However, the purpose, method, and product moves were similar in their frequency, but the introduction and conclusion moves seemed to be different, with the least occurring frequency and having the least percentages. The purpose move was the most dominant in all the abstracts that have been examined in this study. The high frequency found in the moves of purpose, method, and product implies that the researchers were aware of the importance of these three moves, whereas the least frequency found in the introduction and conclusion moves demonstrates that some researchers were not aware of the importance of establishing the context of the manuscript and motivating the research or discussion and interpreting or extending the results beyond the scope of the manuscript, drawing inferences, pointing to applications, or suggesting wider implications. The writers had a tendency to begin their abstracts with a purpose move and end the abstracts without drawing references to the field by providing no further suggestions on how to improve their studies in the future. This finding indicates that the writers of this corpus regard the background, method, and significance of the study as more important. Since there is no previously written similar research on this issue, this can be interpreted as the writers’ are lacking rhetorical knowledge on the other two moves (introduction and conclusion), or perhaps they do not attach any importance to mentioning them.

As shown in Table 3 , the most frequent verb tense in all the five moves was the present tense. However, the most frequent pattern can be seen in the purpose move with a percentage of 90%. Only in the method move past tense was more frequent with a percentage of 87%. The most frequent patterns were in introduction move (a) Pr-P, purpose move (b) Pr-P, method move (c) P-Pr, product move (d) P-Pr, and conclusion move (e) P-Pr-F. It can be seen that the present voice was the most frequently preferred structure, and only in the conclusion move, the future tense was preferred only in three abstracts among 50 manuscripts to give further implications on the study. According to Table 3 , in the introduction, purpose and conclusion moves present tense was used more frequently and to categorize this present simple and present continuous, and present perfect tenses were the most frequently seen. In the product move, the use of past tense was seen to be more than the present tense. Finally, in the conclusion move, from the findings, it can be understood that all tenses are used, including past, present, and future, however, the further findings reflect that the present tense was used more, followed by past and future tense. The differences in tenses usage and their frequency were in the method and product moves. There was no future tense used in the other moves, while 12% of the ELT abstracts were written in the future form. For the method move, only 13% of the abstracts were written in the present form, while 87% were written in the past tense. Thus, we can say that the most frequent tense used in most moves was present simple, while the past tense was the second most frequent and the future tense was found to be the least frequent in three abstracts only to present the conclusion move. However, other previous studies by Zhang et al. (2012) and Suntara and Usaha (2013) stated that the most dominant tense was the past tense in the studies they have carried out.

When our study is compared with other studies by Tseng (2011) and Alhuqbani (2013) , it has been found that they both included the same similarities and differences in tenses usage. This means that in the introduction, purpose, and conclusion moves, they tended to use the present simple tense, whereas in our study, introduction, purpose, product, and conclusion moves present tense was mostly used, but the method and product moves were different in the tense usage because past tense was used more which is similar to Alhuqbani’s and Tseng’s findings. Tseng found that in method and product moves, past tense usage was more dominant, which is similar to our findings. However, Zhang et al. (2012) suggested that in their findings, present tense was not seen in the method move in the abstracts he examined. This implies that there are variations in the methodology part of the writings of research manuscripts’ abstracts.

In Table 4 , the findings showed that in general, active voice usage was mostly used in all moves. Especially, in the purpose move, the active voice was used by 90% with the highest percentage, while the passive voice was used by 10%. The second most frequent choice was a mixture of active and passive voices that occurred in the method move. This was similar to Zhang et al. (2012) findings, which stated that active voice was more frequent than passive voice. On the contrary, Tu and Wang (2013) revealed that passive voice was the most frequently used in the RA abstracts they have examined. Moreover, Hanidar (2016) also mentioned that writers prefer to use the passive form more when they are presenting the procedure of their research and stating their findings. Nevertheless, in our findings, a combination of the active and passive voices was used, which indicates that most writers tend to develop their abstracts directly rather than using an indirect style. Only in the product move, the passive voice seem to be the least frequent with the lowest percentage (7%).

Although there have been a lot of studies conducted on abstract writing by both native and non-native speakers of English, my research is different from the previous studies due to the fact that only abstracts written by Turkish students were analyzed. The reason for conducting this research only on Turkish students is to identify strengths and weaknesses in the moves of the abstracts, as there is a wealth of literature available on native students. We believe that this study will contribute to the field, improve the current literature on the topic, and provide a significant step by examining the rhetorical structure of Turkish abstracts within the framework of Hyland’s (2000) five-move pattern. The findings of a study conducted by Çandarlı (2012) showed that all abstracts include the introduction move. The reason for this could be the move pattern he followed (IMRC), in which the purpose move had to be stated in the introduction move. In the study carried out by Al-Khasawneh (2017) , it was found that in the examined abstracts by native and non-native speakers of English, three moves (introduction, purpose, and product) were available, which implies that both abstract writers are aware of the importance of the moves in their abstracts. However, the only difference was detected in the abstracts of native writers because they included introduction and conclusion moves more than the non-natives. It is believed that this study can help students and novice writers, especially those from non-English backgrounds to facilitate their successful acculturation into their disciplinary community. Another study conducted by Çakır and Fidan (2015) is believed to raise students’ awareness and help them choose suitable moves to fulfill their aims. Moreover, it is believed that their study will have important implications for the future. The findings of a study done by Kaya and Yağız (2020) are assumed to help authors in this field be familiar with abstract writing conventions. Also, the results are believed to benefit the production of academic writing materials for scholars and academic writing courses. Since it is a comparative study, the results would help non-natives be aware of the conventions of academic writing and guide them throughout the process involved in global research. However, the results of Ashofteh et al. (2020) demonstrate that non-native speakers use more hedges and are more tentative in their abstracts which shows that they leave more space for opposing views in their claims. Furthermore, Saidi and Khazaei’s (2021) study is believed to be used in teaching academic writing to graduate students in English for academic purposes and to help them present their findings globally.

Generally, the authors’ aim in conducting research in this field is that they believe it will be beneficial for beginner writers. The suggestions and recommendations and the findings of the results will guide them to produce better academic reports by following the rules to develop writing skills. In this regard, it would be appropriate to say that this research is expected to provide similar pedagogical implications.

This study has been carried out to investigate the rhetorical structure of English RA abstracts in ELT theses. Five moves have been identified and analyzed. The present tense and active voice were the most chosen and frequently occurring. As a result of this, the past tense, present perfect tense, and passive voice were seldomly used. Moreover, the findings of this study are presented in a descriptive style since all the results are discussed. For this reason, the authors who will be writing manuscripts in the field of English language teaching should consider these findings and develop their abstracts accordingly. The benefit of this study would be to apply what is useful and needed for the implementation of pedagogical practice. Writing abstracts can be helpful for the development of teaching materials and thesis manuscripts, and with the correct guidance, non-native writers or graduate students who are in the process of developing their careers can be helped to solve their writing problems and organize their work in five moves. Moreover, these five moves would help the development of English abstracts for conference presentations or publications. It is believed that once writers gain a full understanding of grammatical and rhetorical features, they will be able to write their abstracts more effectively. Furthermore, the findings regarding the tense and voice usage presented in this study would be a guide to offer the limitations and drawbacks when writing abstracts. Thus, these restrictions should be considered when carrying out move analysis studies in the future. Peacock (2002) claims that move structures should be taught to non-native speakers and novice writers to help them to be able to write the abstract sections of their research correctly. However, this study is limited since it only focuses on one section, which is abstracts. Likely, another limitation of this study could be the small sample size due to its restriction to 50 abstracts, with the result that it can be generalized to all ELT thesis abstracts. Future studies can focus on the large scale of samples, considering all the suggestions and recommendations made in this research.

Data Availability Statement

Author contributions.

SS and BM contributed equally to the manuscript generation, writing process, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

• Abdollahpour Z., Gholami J. (2019). Embodiment of rhetorical moves in lexical bundles in abstracts of the medical sciences. S. Afr. Linguist. Appl. Lang. Stud. 37 339–360. 10.2989/16073614.2019.1692681 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Alhuqbani M. N. (2013). Genre-based analysis of Arabic research article abstracts across four disciplines. J. Educ. Soc. Res. 3 371–382. 10.5901/jesr.2013.v4n3p371 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Al-Khasawneh F. M. (2017). A genre analysis of research article abstracts written by native and non-native speakers of English. J. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Res. 4 1–13. [ Google Scholar ]
• Al-Zubaidi K. O. (2012). Academic writing of Arab postgraduate students: discussing the main language issues. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 66 46–52. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.246 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Anderson T., Saunders G., Alexander I. (2021). Alternative dissertation formats in education based doctorates. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 41 593–612. 10.1080/07294360.2020.1867513 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ashofteh Z., Elahi Shirvan M., Golparvar S. E. (2020). The move structure of abstracts in applied linguistics research articles in light of the distribution and functions of metadiscourse markers. J. Lang. Linguist. Stud. 16 2077–2096. 10.17263/jlls.851035 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Belcher W. L. (2009). Writing Your Journal Article in 12 Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bhatia V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brown H. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching , 4th Edn. New York, NY: Longman. [ Google Scholar ]
• Çakır H., Fidan Ö. (2015). “ A contrastive study of the rhetorical structure of Turkish and English research article abstracts ,” in Ankara Papers in Turkish and Turkic Linguistics , eds Zeyrek D., Sagin Simsek C., Atas U., Rehbein J. (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag; ), 367–378. 10.2307/j.ctvc770nr.36 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Can S., Karabacak E., Qin J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications 4 : 23 . 10.3390/publications4030023 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Çandarlı D. (2012). A cross-cultural investigation of English and Turkish research article abstracts in educational sciences. Stud. About Lang. 20 12–17. 10.5755/j01.sal.0.20.1770 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen Y., Su S. (2011). A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT J. 6 184–192. 10.1093/elt/ccr061 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ding H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. Engl. Specif. Purp. 26 368–392. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Eggins S. (2004). Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics , 2nd Edn. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. [ Google Scholar ]
• El-Dakhs D. A. S. (2018). Comparative genre analysis of research article abstracts in more and less prestigious journals: linguistics journals in focus. Res. Lang. 16 47–63. 10.2478/rela-2018-0002 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hanidar S. (2016). Rhetorical patterns, verb tenses, and voice in cross disciplinary research article abstracts. Humaniora 28 12–27. 10.22146/jh.v28i1.11410 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hartley J. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology: the case for structure. Sci. Commun. 24 366–379. 10.1177/1075547002250301 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hartley J., Betts L. (2009). Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60 2010–2018. 10.1002/asi.21102 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hyland K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hyland K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.23927 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hyland K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. J. Second Lang. Writ. 16 148–164. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hyland K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. J. Second Lang. Writ. 31 58–69. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kanoksilapatham B. (2007). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. Engl. Specif. Purp. 24 269–292. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kanoksilapatham B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterising structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. Engl. Specif. Purp. 37 74–86. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kaya F., Yağız O. (2020). Move analysis of research article abstracts in the field of ELT: a comparative study. J. Lang. Linguist. Stud. 16 390–404. 10.17263/jlls.712854 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kossasih F. R. (2018). A genre analysis of thesis abstracts at a State University in Banten. Lingua Cult. 12 9–14. 10.21512/lc.v12i1.1963 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Male H. (2018). A structural move analysis of abstracts in undergraduate theses: a case study at Universitas Kristen Indonesia. KnE Soc. Sci. 3 284–294. 10.18502/kss.v3i9.2690 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martín-Martín P. (2005). The Rhetoric of the Abstract in English and Spanish Scientific Discourse: A Crosscultural Genre-Analytic Approach , Vol. 21 . Bern: Peter Lang. [ Google Scholar ]
• Niu G. (2013). “ A genre analysis of Chinese and English abstracts of academic journal articles: a parallel-corpus-based study ,” in Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science , Vol. 8229 eds Liu P., Su Q. (Berlin: Springer; ), 603–616. 10.1007/978-3-642-45185-0_63 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Othman A. (2011). Genre Analysis: An Investigation of MA Dissertation Abstracts. Ph.D. dissertation. Wad Madani: University of Gezira. [ Google Scholar ]
• Paré A. (2017). Re-thinking the dissertation and doctoral supervision/reflexiones sobre la tesis doctoral y su supervisión. Infanc. Aprendizaje 40 407–428. 10.1080/02103702.2017.1341102 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Peacock M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System 30 479–497. 10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Piqué-Noguera C. (2012). Writing business research article abstracts: a genre approach. Iberica 24 211–232. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ren H., Li Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language theses. Engl. Lang. Teach. 4 162–166. 10.5539/elt.v4n1p162 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Saidi M., Khazaei Z. (2021). Genre analysis of research article abstracts in applied linguistics: exploring sub-disciplinary variations. Int. J. Engl. Lang. Transl. Stud. 9 34–40. 10.1155/2021/3578179 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Salager-Meyer F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English 13 149–171. 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Santos M. B. D. (1996). The textual organisation of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text 16 481–499. 10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Suntara W., Usaha S. (2013). Research article abstracts in two related disciplines: rhetorical variation between linguistics and applied linguistics. Engl. Lang. Teach. 6 84–99. 10.5539/elt.v6n2p84 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Swales J. (2004). Research Genres Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Swales J. M., Feak C. B. (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills , Vol. 1 . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tanko G. (2017). Literary research article abstracts: an analysis of rhetorical. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 27 42–55. 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tardy C. M. (2005). “It’s like a story” rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 4 325–338. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.005 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tas E. E. I. (2008). A Corpus-Based Analysis of Genre-Specific Discourse of Research: The PhD thesis and the Research Article in ELT . Doctoral dissertation. Çankaya: Middle East Technical University. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tseng F. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tenses of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. Int. J. Engl. Linguist. 1 27–39. 10.5539/ijel.v1n2p27 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tu P. N., Wang S. P. (2013). “ Corpus-based research on tense analysis and rhetorical structure in journal article abstracts ,” in Paper Presented at the 27th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC 27) (Taipei: National Chengchi University; ). [ Google Scholar ]
• Upton T., Connor U. (2001). Using computerised corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. Engl. Specif. Purp. 20 313–329. 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00022-3 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Walter E. (2008). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary Hardback with CD-ROM for Windows and Mac Klett Edition. Deutchland: Ernst Klett Sprachen. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yelland C. (2011). A genre and move analysis of written feedback in higher education. Lang. Lit. 20 218–235. 10.1177/0963947011413563 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yu S. (2021). Giving genre-based peer feedback in academic writing: sources of knowledge and skills, difficulties and challenges. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 46 36–53. 10.1080/02602938.2020.1742872 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang B., Thuc Q. B. T., Pramoolsook I. (2012). Moves and linguistic realisations: English research article abstracts by Vietnamese agricultural researchers. Asian ESP J. 8 126–149. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhu W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. J. Second Lang. Writ. 13 29–48. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

File(s) under embargo

until file(s) become available

Reading Gaps and Writing Distances: Toward a Narratology of the Short Story Cycle

Principal supervisor, additional supervisor 1, year of award, department, school or centre, degree type, campus location, usage metrics.

• Creative writing (incl. scriptwriting)
• Literary theory
• Literary studies not elsewhere classified

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• 04 March 2024
• Clarification 05 March 2024

Millions of research papers at risk of disappearing from the Internet

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

You have full access to this article via your institution.

A study identified more than two million articles that did not appear in a major digital archive, despite having an active DOI. Credit: Anna Berkut/Alamy

More than one-quarter of scholarly articles are not being properly archived and preserved, a study of more than seven million digital publications suggests. The findings, published in the Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication on 24 January 1 , indicate that systems to preserve papers online have failed to keep pace with the growth of research output.

“Our entire epistemology of science and research relies on the chain of footnotes,” explains author Martin Eve, a researcher in literature, technology and publishing at Birkbeck, University of London. “If you can’t verify what someone else has said at some other point, you’re just trusting to blind faith for artefacts that you can no longer read yourself.”

Eve, who is also involved in research and development at digital-infrastructure organization Crossref, checked whether 7,438,037 works labelled with digital object identifiers (DOIs) are held in archives. DOIs — which consist of a string of numbers, letters and symbols — are unique fingerprints used to identify and link to specific publications, such as scholarly articles and official reports. Crossref is the largest DOI registration agency, allocating the identifiers to about 20,000 members, including publishers, museums and other institutions.

The sample of DOIs included in the study was made up of a random selection of up to 1,000 registered to each member organization. Twenty-eight per cent of these works — more than two million articles — did not appear in a major digital archive, despite having an active DOI. Only 58% of the DOIs referenced works that had been stored in at least one archive. The other 14% were excluded from the study because they were published too recently, were not journal articles or did not have an identifiable source.

Preservation challenge

Eve notes that the study has limitations: namely that it tracked only articles with DOIs, and that it did not search every digital repository for articles (he did not check whether items with a DOI were stored in institutional repositories, for example).

Nevertheless, preservation specialists have welcomed the analysis. “It’s been hard to know the real extent of the digital preservation challenge faced by e-journals,” says William Kilbride, managing director of the Digital Preservation Coalition, headquartered in York, UK. The coalition publishes a handbook detailing good preservation practice.

“Many people have the blind assumption that if you have a DOI, it’s there forever,” says Mikael Laakso, who studies scholarly publishing at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki. “But that doesn’t mean that the link will always work.” In 2021, Laakso and his colleagues reported 2 that more than 170 open-access journals had disappeared from the Internet between 2000 and 2019.

Kate Wittenberg, managing director of the digital archiving service Portico in New York City, warns that small publishers are at higher risk of failing to preserve articles than are large ones. “It costs money to preserve content,” she says, adding that archiving involves infrastructure, technology and expertise that many smaller organizations do not have access to.

Eve’s study suggests some measures that could improve digital preservation, including stronger requirements at DOI registration agencies and better education and awareness of the issue among publishers and researchers.

“Everybody thinks of the immediate gains they might get from having a paper out somewhere, but we really should be thinking about the long-term sustainability of the research ecosystem,” Eve says. “After you’ve been dead for 100 years, are people going to be able to get access to the things you’ve worked on?”

Nature 627 , 256 (2024)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00616-5

Updates & Corrections

Clarification 05 March 2024 : The headline of this story has been edited to reflect the fact that some of these papers have not entirely disappeared from the Internet. Rather, many papers are still accessible but have not been properly archived.

Eve, M. P. J. Libr. Sch. Commun. 12 , eP16288 (2024).

Article   Google Scholar  

Laakso, M., Matthias, L. & Jahn, N. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 72 , 1099–1112 (2021).

Download references

Reprints and permissions

• Information technology
• Scientific community

AI image generators often give racist and sexist results: can they be fixed?

News Feature 19 MAR 24

Why scientists trust AI too much — and what to do about it

Editorial 06 MAR 24

Gender bias is more exaggerated in online images than in text

News & Views 14 FEB 24

Is AI ready to mass-produce lay summaries of research articles?

Nature Index 20 MAR 24

‘Woah, this is affecting me’: why I’m fighting racial inequality in prostate-cancer research

Career Q&A 20 MAR 24

Are we in the Anthropocene yet?

Editorial 20 MAR 24

Peer-replication model aims to address science’s ‘reproducibility crisis’

Nature Index 13 MAR 24

Numbers highlight US dominance in clinical research

Postdoctoral Associate

Our laboratory at the Washington University in St. Louis is seeking a postdoctoral experimental biologist to study urogenital diseases and cancer.

Saint Louis, Missouri

Washington University School of Medicine Department of Medicine

Recruitment of Global Talent at the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IOZ, CAS)

The Institute of Zoology (IOZ), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), is seeking global talents around the world.

Beijing, China

Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IOZ, CAS)

Postdoctoral Fellow-Proteomics/Mass Spectrometry

Location: Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA Department: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Tulane University School of Med...

New Orleans, Louisiana

Tulane University School of Medicine (SOM)

Open Faculty Position in Mathematical and Information Security

We are now seeking outstanding candidates in all areas of mathematics and information security.

Dongguan, Guangdong, China

GREAT BAY INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY： Institute of Mathematical and Information Security

Faculty Positions in Bioscience and Biomedical Engineering (BSBE) Thrust, Systems Hub, HKUST (GZ)

Tenure-track and tenured faculty positions at all ranks (Assistant Professor/Associate Professor/Professor)

The university is situated in the heart of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area, a highly active and vibrant region in the world.

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Physics Ph.D. candidate wins 2024 Three Minute Thesis competition

By | Katya Hrichak , Cornell University Graduate School

“I want you to remember a time when you were in a setting where you felt like you didn’t belong. I want you to remember how you felt in that setting, maybe isolated or out of place, and how much you felt like you wanted to continue going back to that setting—probably not much. These feelings are all too familiar for undergraduate women pursuing their studies in science, and in physics specifically,” began Meagan Sundstrom, a doctoral candidate in physics at the ninth annual Cornell University Three Minute Thesis (3MT) competition.

Alongside seven other finalists, Sundstrom presented her dissertation research in just three minutes on March 20 to a panel of judges and an audience from across campus while additional friends, family, advisors, and lab mates watched online. In the first in-person Cornell 3MT since 2019, presentations were judged by how clearly and compellingly students summarized their research to a general audience, using only one static slide.

Sundstrom’s presentation, “Recognizing and Removing Barriers for Women in Physics,” earned her first place and $1,500. Second place and $1,000 was awarded to information science doctoral student Sterling Williams-Ceci for her presentation, “AI Helps us Write – but at What Cost?”

After nearly 60 in-person and 70 virtual audience members cast their ballots, votes were tallied and the People’s Choice Award and $250 were presented to biomedical and biological sciences doctoral candidate Sharada Gopal for her presentation, “Worming Our Way to a Longer Life.”

This year’s judges included Jane Bunker, director of Cornell University Press; Joe Ellis, director of online degree program development at eCornell; David Lodge, the Francis J. DiSalvo Director of the Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability; and Bob Riter, patient advocate for the Cornell Community Cancer Partnership. Organization of the competition and coaching of presenters was provided by the Graduate School Office of Career and Professional Development.

“As grad students, there are a lot of opportunities to give your elevator pitch at conferences and more professional settings to more senior people in your field, and I thought this would be a really cool opportunity for me to try to tailor that pitch to a more general audience—how would I describe my research to my family and friends?—so that was fun,” said Sundstrom.

Being able to “zoom out” and view her topic from a different perspective was also helpful for Sundstrom, who is currently writing her dissertation and appreciates having both formulated a storyline and thought about the broader impacts of her work.

Williams-Ceci similarly enjoyed the chance to speak to a different type of audience than she is used to addressing.

“I hadn’t really had an opportunity in grad school to try communicating to a broad audience, it’s always just to my lab, so I wanted to practice having a chance to really tell a story and not just go through the slides,” she said. “It really helped me know for a fact that I can tell a convincing story about a project that I’ve done.”

Gopal shared that the 3MT was a fun way to combine her longtime artistic interests with her science.

“It seemed like such a fun event. I did a lot of theatre in college so I thought, ‘What can I do artistically here?’ and this seemed like a good mix of my scientific interest and my artistic theatre interests,” she said, adding that she also benefitted from looking at the bigger picture of her work and its impacts.

The 3MT competition was first held in 2008 at the University of Queensland and has since been adopted by over 900 universities in over 85 countries. 3MT challenges research degree students to present a compelling story on their dissertation or thesis and its significance in just three minutes, in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience.

Cornell’s Graduate School first hosted a 3MT competition in 2015 and the event has grown steadily since that time. As the winner of Cornell’s competition, Sundstrom will now go on to compete in northeast regional competitions.

“Our Three Minute Thesis final round is a highlight of the year for those of us in the Graduate School—literally we talk about it all year long,” said Kathryn J. Boor, dean of the Graduate School and vice provost for graduate education. “We look forward to it because it’s just plain fun, and it’s an opportunity for us to watch and learn from our accomplished and creative graduate researchers.”

“I could not possibly be more proud of the work we saw,” she said.

Read the story on the Cornell University Graduate School website.

More News from A&S

Nicholas Kiefer, economist and ‘towering intellect,’ dies at 73

Mars Sample Return a top scientific priority, Lunine testifies

Talk by Italian author on his writing and his papers donated to the library, March 26

Astronomy mourns Mary Mulvanerton, ‘amazing problem-solver’

Asian Literature, Religion, and Culture Ph.D. Candidate Wins Three Minute Thesis Competition

Graduate School

By | Katya Hrichak , Cornell University Graduate School

“So, this is a coin from 12th century Sri Lanka. And, like many coins, it’s inscribed with the name of the monarch who commissioned it,” began Bruno Shirley, a doctoral candidate in Asian literature, religion, and culture at the seventh annual Cornell University Three Minute Thesis (3MT) competition.

Alongside seven other finalists, Shirley presented his dissertation research in just three minutes to a panel of judges and a virtual audience from across campus and around the world. Presentations were judged by how clearly and compellingly students summarized their research to a general audience, using only one static slide.

His presentation, “ Constructing Buddhist kingship in medieval Sri Lanka ,” earned him first place and $1,500. Second place and $1,000 was awarded to physics doctoral candidate Vaibhav Sharma for his presentation, “ What happens when atoms colder than outer space are spun around? ”

After nearly 100 audience members cast their ballots, votes were tallied and the People’s Choice Award and $250 were presented to plant pathology and plant-microbe biology doctoral candidate Juliana González-Tobón for her presentation, “Can bacteria smell their food?”

For Shirley, whose fieldwork plans were disrupted by the pandemic, entering the 3MT enabled him to reengage with his dissertation research.

“These three-minute talks are more than just elevator pitches; the process helped me to really hone-in on what’s most important in my dissertation topic,” he said. “It’s so easy to lose sight of the woods for the trees when we’re deep into dissertation-land, and this was a valuable opportunity to step back and re-orient.”

Sharma, while enthusiastic about his research, struggled to articulate it clearly and compellingly to friends and family in the past. Through the 3MT, he learned valuable skills about concisely summarizing his complex research.

“Before 3MT, I didn’t believe I could talk about my research in just three minutes. The 3MT preparation stage was an eye-opener for me, and I realized the value of each and every sentence. There was no benefit to adding a single ‘filler’ or useless word. I learned how to cut down on verbosity and explain even difficult concepts in brief and easy to understand language. It will help me in the long run if I write shorter and better papers,” he said. “And now if anyone asks me about my research, I can just give them the link to my 3MT video.”

González-Tobón wanted to enter the 3MT since she began her doctoral program and appreciated that this year’s virtual platform allowed for a larger audience.

“It was a great opportunity to invite friends and family from around the world. As an international student, being able to invite everyone felt fantastic and was so heart-warming!” she said. “Also, since the finalists were both international and domestic and from several different research areas, it was amazing to see how diverse this community is and how different our expertise areas are.”

The 3MT competition was first held in 2008 at the University of Queensland and has since been adopted by over 900 universities in over 85 countries. 3MT challenges research degree students to present a compelling story on their dissertation or thesis and its significance in just three minutes, in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience.

Cornell’s Graduate School first hosted a 3MT competition in 2015 and the event has grown steadily since that time. Cornell’s winner will go on to compete in the Northeastern Association of Graduate Schools 3MT competition in late April.

“We are so proud of each and every one of our finalists,” said Jan Allen, associate dean for academic and student affairs. “They not only gave excellent presentations, but learned important skills about research communication in the process that will benefit them as they graduate and move into new roles.”

Cornell’s seventh 3MT final round competition was held on March 22, 2022, at 4:00 p.m. on Zoom.

Read the story on the Cornell University Graduate School website.

More News from A&S

Nicholas Kiefer, economist and ‘towering intellect,’ dies at 73

Physics Ph.D. candidate wins 2024 Three Minute Thesis competition

Mars Sample Return a top scientific priority, Lunine testifies

Talk by Italian author on his writing and his papers donated to the library, March 26

• Announcements
• In The News

Thursday, March 21, 2024

Davis College doctoral student wins second place at national pitch competition

Sindupa De Silva, doctoral student from the Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design, showed his savvy research communications skills at the Three-Minute Thesis Regional Competition in Greenville, South Carolina, by winning second place.

As the 2023 WVU 3MT Competition winner, De Silva represented WVU at the annual Conference of Southern Graduate Schools by participating in a two-day competition against 60 contestants who were all 3MT competition winners from East Coast schools.

The internationally renowned 3MT competition, founded by the University of Queensland in Australia, challenges doctoral students to present their dissertation research in just three minutes using a single PowerPoint slide. 

De Silva’s presentation, “Human Land-Use Practices and Their Impacts on Nature’s Kidneys,” focuses on how 30% of the world’s population — 2.2 billion people — do not have access to clean water, and how protecting wetland ecosystems globally can help protect the availability of clean water.

Betty Mei, program director for graduate student success in the Office of Graduate Education and Life , helped coach De Silva to perfect his pitch performance.

“It was my pleasure working with Sindupa ahead of the regional competition,” Mei said. “Competing with 3MT winners from over 60 universities is no easy task. I am so proud of Sindupa for giving his best performance yet to garner a second-place award.”

De Silva plans to continue pitching his research dissertation. Next up, he will compete at the Council of Graduate Schools Annual Conference’s 3MT competition in St. Louis later this fall. 

WVU holds the annual competition during Graduate Student Appreciation Week. This year, 10 finalists will compete for cash prizes beginning at 6 p.m. April 3 in the Mountainlair Ballrooms. The public is invited to attend the event and cast votes for their favorite presentation for the People’s Choice Award. 

For questions, contact Mei at [email protected].

News & Events

View the contact page for more contact and location information

Eight compete in Trinity’s Three-Minute Thesis competition final

Posted on: 22 March 2024

Eight speakers competed in the final event, which requires researchers to present their research, armed with just one slide, in a manner that makes sense to a non-specialist audience, and within a fixed time limit of three minutes.  

Rosie Giglia (below) from the School of Medicine was this week named the winner of Trinity’s annual Three-Minute Thesis competition, for a presentation about her research into Multiple Sclerosis. 

The runner-up at the event involving graduate research students from all faculties was Lamya Al Shuhaimi, from the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, whose presentation was called: Enhancing Prescribing in Older Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. The People’s Choice award also went to Lamya Al Shuhaimi.  

In this time speakers must explain in an engaging manner the purpose of the research, outline what actions they took and the impact of their findings.  

Originally developed by the University of Queensland, the event is designed to support graduate research students in their development as confident research communicators.  

The judges at the final event were Dean of Graduate Studies Martine Smith, Prof. Brian Broderick and University Spokesperson Catherine O’Mahony. 

As chair of the judging panel, Prof. Brian Broderick paid tribute to all the finalists (pictured below) for the extraordinarily high standard of their work. 

In 2023, the winner of the Trinity Three-Minute Thesis event, Lianne Shanley, also won the first national Three-Minute Thesis competition. 

The competitors and their topics were as follows: 

Wai Qian Tham , School of Engineering: Enhanced Daylighting in Buildings for Occupants’ Health 

Lamya Al Shuhaimi , School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences: Enhancing Prescribing in Older Adults with Intellectual Disabilities 

Clíodhna Daly , School of Biochemistry and Immunology: MRSA and the Host, An Encounter to Remember 

Anna Rosická , School of Psychology: Neureka! Brain Health Research in Your Pocket 

Rosie Giglia , School of Medicine: Unravelling Cognitive Dysfunction: Crafting New Tools for Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis 

Mark Lyons , School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences: From Sword to Scalpel - Development of Orellanine as a Treatment for Kidney Cancer 

Sharon Chi Tak Lee , School of Psychology: Get it Right, From the Get-Go: A Digital Revolution in Precision Psychiatry 

Stephen Huws , School of Religion, Theology, and Peace Studies: Through the Stained Glass: How Art Illuminates Our Heritage. 

Media Contact:

Catherine O’Mahony | Media Relations | [email protected]

• Graduate Programs
• Undergraduate Programs
• Schedule a tour
• Strategic Research Areas
• Research Groups, Centers and Labs
• Undergraduate Research Opportunities
• Executive Leadership
• Administrative Staff
• Faculty Awards and Honors
• Resources and Groups for ECE Women
• ECE Advisory Council
• ECE Connections
• Giving Opportunities
• Ways to Give
• Academic Support
• Financial Support
• Mental Health Resources
• Experience and Employment
• Undergraduate Services
• Graduate Services and Activities

Cong Chen and Zeki Hayran receive 2024 ECE Outstanding Ph.D. Thesis Research Award

Cong Chen and Zeki Hayran are the winners of this year's ECE Outstanding Ph.D. Thesis Research Award. The annual award is given to graduating Ph.D. students from the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) based on the significance of their doctoral research. 

Chen’s research aims to drive the global energy transition toward a carbon-neutral future, which relies on the large-scale integration of renewables and electrification across transportation, civil infrastructure, and industrial manufacturing sectors. Her thesis addresses two challenges of energy transition: (i) the aggregation of small but vast distributed energy resources (e.g., rooftop solar and electric vehicles) to balance global energy demand and supply under the recent landmark ruling of the Federal Energy Regulatory Agency; (ii) the integration of battery resources for reliability, resilience, and economic efficiency of future power grids with high penetration of stochastic renewable energy.

“It’s my great honor to receive the ECE Outstanding Ph.D. Thesis Award, a profound encouragement for me to continue my exciting and challenging research journey. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supportive and inspiring advisor Lang Tong , my coauthors, my labmates from Digital Energy and Power Systems Group , my family, and my friends,” said Chen.

Hayran’s research focuses on metamaterials—materials engineered to possess specific optical properties—that vary over time. Historically, metamaterials had properties that varied only in space. Hayran’s work has demonstrated that by incorporating time as an additional degree of freedom, not only do many interesting physical phenomena emerge, but we can also surpass conventional performance limits for many applications. This opens the door to advancing next-generation photonic and electromagnetic systems with low-energy consumption and superior performance and capabilities.

“I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Francesco Monticone for his invaluable mentoring and guidance throughout my Ph.D. journey. Being recognized with this award is a true honor. It symbolizes not only the culmination of years of dedication and hard work but also the support and guidance I have received from mentors, peers, and collaborators. This accolade marks a significant milestone in my academic career and fuels my commitment to continue pursuing innovative research, aiming to contribute further to our collective understanding and advancement in the field,” said Hayran.

The ECE Graduate Committee reviews award nominations and the director of graduate studies oversees the process. In addition to a cash prize, the winner(s) will be presented with an engraved plaque near the end of the semester.

Other Articles of Interest

Center for technology licensing program continues to fund early-stage cornell lab innovations.

Eight projects have been selected from the Fall 2023 application cycle to receive Ignite Innovation Acceleration grants. The grants are designed to help project teams pursue licensing, form startups... Read more about Center for Technology Licensing program continues to fund early-stage Cornell lab innovations

High bandwidth means smart signal timing; spiral waveguides are here to help

Using 3-D stacks of reflectors on microchips could triple data rates of wireless links to help speed development of 6G communications, a new study finds. Most current wireless communications... Read more about High bandwidth means smart signal timing; spiral waveguides are here to help

Creating a remote sensor to detect health troubles

The device could be particularly helpful for patients with geriatric heart failure and other serious conditions. Read more about Creating a remote sensor to detect health troubles