how to test critical thinking

By continuing to use this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Find out more . Accept cookies

Critical Thinking test

By 123test team . Updated May 12, 2023

Customer reviews

This Critical Thinking test measures your ability to think critically and draw logical conclusions based on written information. Critical Thinking tests are often used in job assessments in the legal sector to assess a candidate's  analytical critical  thinking skills. A well known example of a critical thinking test is the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal .

Need more practice?

Score higher on your critical thinking test.

The test comprises of the following five sections with a total of 10 questions:

• Analysing Arguments
• Assumptions
• Interpreting Information

Instructions Critical Thinking test

Each question presents one or more paragraphs of text and a question about the information in the text. It's your job to figure out which of the options is the correct answer.

Below is a statement that is followed by an argument. You should consider this argument to be true. It is then up to you to determine whether the argument is strong or weak. Do not let your personal opinion about the statement play a role in your evaluation of the argument.

Statement: It would be good if people would eat vegetarian more often. Argument: No, because dairy also requires animals to be kept that will have to be eaten again later.

Is this a strong or weak argument?

Strong argument Weak argument

Statement: Germany should no longer use the euro as its currency Argument: No, because that means that the 10 billion Deutschmark that the introduction of the euro has cost is money thrown away.

Overfishing is the phenomenon that too much fish is caught in a certain area, which leads to the disappearance of the fish species in that area. This trend can only be reversed by means of catch reduction measures. These must therefore be introduced and enforced.

Assumption: The disappearance of fish species in areas of the oceans is undesirable.

Is the assumption made from the text?

Assumption is made Assumption is not made

As a company, we strive for satisfied customers. That's why from now on we're going to keep track of how quickly our help desk employees pick up the phone. Our goal is for that phone to ring for a maximum of 20 seconds.

Assumption: The company has tools or ways to measure how quickly help desk employees pick up the phone.

• All reptiles lay eggs
• All reptiles are vertebrates
• All snakes are reptiles
• All vertebrates have brains
• Some reptiles hatch their eggs themselves
• Most reptiles have two lungs
• Many snakes only have one lung
• Cobras are poisonous snakes
• All reptiles are animals

Conclusion: Some snakes hatch their eggs themselves.

Does the conclusion follow the statements?

Conclusion follows Conclusion does not follow

(Continue with the statements from question 5.)

Conclusion: Some animals that lay eggs only have one lung.

In the famous 1971 Stanford experiment, 24 normal, healthy male students were randomly assigned as 'guards' (12) or 'prisoners' (12). The guards were given a uniform and instructed to keep order, but not to use force. The prisoners were given prison uniforms. Soon after the start of the experiment, the guards made up all kinds of sentences for the prisoners. Insurgents were shot down with a fire extinguisher and public undressing or solitary confinement was also a punishment. The aggression of the guards became stronger as the experiment progressed. At one point, the abuses took place at night, because the guards thought that the researchers were not watching. It turned out that some guards also had fun treating the prisoners very cruelly. For example, prisoners got a bag over their heads and were chained to their ankles. Originally, the experiment would last 14 days. However, after six days the experiment was stopped.

The students who took part in the research did not expect to react the way they did in such a situation.

To what extent is this conclusion true, based on the given text?

True Probably true More information required Probably false False

(Continue with the text from 'Stanford experiment' in question 7.)

The results of the experiment support the claim that every young man (or at least some young men) is capable of turning into a sadist fairly quickly.

• A flag is a tribute to the nation and should therefore not be hung outside at night. Hoisting the flag therefore happens at sunrise, bringing it down at sunset. Only when a country flag is illuminated by spotlights on both sides, it may remain hanging after sunset. There is a simple rule of thumb for the time of bringing down the flag. This is the moment when there is no longer any visible difference between the individual colors of the flag.
• A flag may not touch the ground.
• On the Dutch flag, unless entitled to do so, no decorations or other additions should be made. Also the use of a flag purely for decoration should be avoided. However, flag cloth may be used for decoration - for example in the form of drapes.
• The orange pennant is only used on birthdays of members of the Royal House and on King's Day. The orange pennant should be as long or slightly longer than the diagonal of the flag.

Conclusion: One can assume that no Dutch flag will fly at government buildings at night, unless it is illuminated by spotlights on both sides.

Does the conclusion follow, based on the given text?

(Continue with the text from 'Dutch flag protocol' in question 9.)

Conclusion: If the protocol is followed, the orange pennant will always be longer than the horizontal bands/stripes of the flag.

Please answer the questions below. Not all questions are required but it will help us improve this test.

My educational level is

-- please select -- primary school high school college university PhD other

Spring Offer 2023

Seven comprehensive reports of career tests and iq tests with a whopping 70% discount..

Seven comprehensive reports of career tests and IQ tests with a whopping 70% discount:

• DISC Personality test
• Jung Personality test
• Big Five Personality test
• Work values test
• Competency test
• Classical IQ test
• Culture fair intelligence test

Het Werkboek Loopbaanbegeleiding helpt je de resultaten bij elkaar te brengen en een actieplan te maken.

Zijn je baan en je loopbaan belangrijk voor je?

With this unique offer, you get access to almost all the comprehensive products for one very competitive price.

Normally $84.00, now for $24.95

You will receive 7 ticket codes after purchase that you can use to start the tests from your personal account. This allows you to take the tests at your own pace and order.

• AON Hewitt G.A.T.E.
• PI Cognitive Assessment (PLI Test)
• Korn Ferry Leadership Assessment
• Berke Assessment
• Ergometrics
• Thomas International
• Predictive Index (PI)
• NEO Personality Inventory
• Leadership Assessment
• Gallup’s CliftonStrengths
• Sales Personality Tests
• Personality Management Tests
• Saville Wave
• McQuaig Word Survey
• Bell Personality Test
• Myers Briggs Personality Test
• DISC Personality Test
• Management SJT
• Supervisory SJT
• Administrative SJT
• Call Center SJT
• Customer Service SJT
• Firefighter SJT
• Numerical Reasoning Tests
• Verbal Reasoning Tests
• Logical Reasoning Tests
• Cognitive Ability Tests
• Technical Aptitude Tests
• Spatial Reasoning Tests
• Abstract Reasoning Test
• Deductive Reasoning Tests
• Inductive Reasoning Tests
• Mechanical Reasoning Tests
• Diagrammatic Reasoning Tests
• Fault Finding Aptitude Tests
• Mathematical Reasoning Tests
• Critical Thinking Tests
• Analytical Reasoning Tests
• Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test
• Criteria’s CCAT
• Matrigma Test
• Air Traffic Controller Test
• Administrative Assistant Exam
• Clerical Ability Exam
• School Secretary Tests
• State Trooper Exam
• Probation Officer Exam
• FBI Entrance Exam
• Office Assistant Exam
• Clerk Typist Test
• Police Records Clerk Exam
• Canada’s Public Service Exams
• Firefighter Exams
• Police Exams
• Army Aptitude Tests
• USPS Postal Exams
• Hiring Process by Professions

Select Page

Critical Thinking Test: Online Preparation & Free Practice Questions – 2024

• Information
• Free Example Questions

What Is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking is a form of decision making and reasoning using data and observations. Someone who is a strong critical thinker can find quality solutions efficiently and can evaluate issues objectively.

What Is a Critical Thinking Test?

Critical thinking tests provide companies valuable insight into the leadership, reasoning, and overall capabilities of candidates. Because strong critical thinking skills are highly sought after, the critical thinking test can be applicable to any field and discipline across multiple levels of expertise from recent graduate to executive. However, it is commonly administered to those applying for criminal justice and business-related occupations.

Job seekers with upcoming critical thinking tests will be evaluated on more than their ability to rationalize, critical thinking tests also measure the following subsets:

• Organizing & Planning
• Strategizing
• Decision Making
• Problem Solving

The format of the critical thinking uses hypothetical scenarios to assess candidates. The scenarios are typically relevant to the field you are interested in to assess your knowledge of the role. There will also be general questions concerning more basic issues or problems that commonly occur in a workplace environment.

The critical thinking test is multiple-choice with thirty minutes to complete the assessment. Candidates will receive a notification stating whether or not they passed within a week of completion.

How Is the Critical Thinking Test Scored?

The critical reasoning test is scored based on your raw score and your percentile in comparison with your norm group. It’s important to note that these will not be the same number.

A norm group is a collection of scores from individuals in your field at your level of experience. The percentile score is used to alert employers if you exceed, meet or miss the benchmark for the average expectations of candidates. You will be rated on a scale of one to one hundred with fifty consisting of the mean and median scores.

A raw score is simply the number of correct answers. The critical thinking test comprises your raw score based on the performance in the following areas:

• Recognizing Assumptions The candidate must be able to understand when a statement is made with no supporting evidence and how this can affect a decision. Further, candidates are asked to identify these discrepancies, whether they are stated explicitly or implicitly, and assess its relevance to the given scenario.
• Evaluating Arguments Candidates must evaluate arguments without considering inferences or being subjective. Beyond that, candidates must assess the supporting evidence, the structure of the argument and the degree of its influence. It is very important to dismiss emotions for this portion of the critical thinking test.
• Drawing Conclusions Drawing conclusions puts a large emphasis on reasoning. In this section, it’s important to assess all of the available evidence and data to form a plausible conclusion that accurately applies to all the given information. Employers also want to see candidates that will consider all possible solutions rather than making the evidence fit a desired narrative.

Employers will receive all of this information in a performance report construed by the assessment company. Employers will also be given insight into your overall potential, job knowledge, creativity and job performance per the report.

Where Will I Take a Critical Thinking Test?

Critical thinking tests are non-proctored online assessments that are typically sent via email after an initial screening. For some occupations, the company may ask that the candidate take the critical thinking test again on-site either before their final interview or during an assessment day. The most common test candidates are asked to take is the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) created by the popular assessment company, Pearson . This assessment company is on their third edition with new scoring and subsets described above. The WGCTA gained popularity because of its ability to assess a candidate’s potential alongside their aptitude. Another established assessment is the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery that contains sixty questions with a thirty-minute time limit. Both of the aforementioned critical thinking tests are multiple choice.

How to Prepare for the Critical Thinking Test?

The critical thinking test is difficult to study for because the test is designed to assess your bare knowledge and raw skills. In order to prepare successfully, it is important to focus on the areas of the test that you can equip yourself for. One aspect of the test that demands preparation is the time limit. Many candidates’ scores are negatively impacted because they skip or guess too many of the questions in an attempt to beat the clock. If you want to optimize your chances of achieving a good score, use online practice tests to acquaint yourself with the time constraint and the general theme of the questions. By utilizing the online practice tests, you can find the pace that works best for you. Another helpful way to prepare is running through sample questions. This way, you can warm-up your brain and gain an understanding of the expectations that both the test and the company have of you.

Free Sample Questions to Practice

• Look over her past quizzes to see what she missed.
• Set aside more time during the week to review the material for the quiz.
• Get to class on early Wednesday and briefly look over the chapters.
• Get a good night’s sleep.
• Parents should find an alternative way to get their kids to school next week.
• The premiums must be over-priced.
• Collective bargaining is no longer a feasible solution.
• Their employers are being unreasonable.
• People in Hawaii dislike living on an island.
• Colder climates induce more happiness than warmer climates.
• The high scores on the Alaska survey were produced by people who enjoy snow.
• People in Hawaii should move to Alaska.
• Jenny’s credit card was declined at the mall.
• Jenny’s bank keeps charging her $30 overdraft fees.
• Jenny’s check bounced when she attempted to purchase a new TV.
• Jenny spends more money than she makes.
• Lori has thirty cans of soda in a refrigerator in her garage and another fourteen sitting on the counter. Lori does not have anymore cans of soda. Therefore, Lori has 44 cans of soda.
• The accounting department loves math. My friend works in the accounting department. My friend loves math.
• Everyone southbound on the freeway yesterday was late to work. Jackie was southbound on the freeway. Jackie was late to work.
• Adrian lives in either Springfield, California, or Springfield, Illinois. If he lives in Illinois, then he is an American.

Aptitude Tests

• Aptitude Tests Guide
• Numerical Reasoning Test
• Verbal Reasoning Test
• Cognitive Ability Test
• Critical Thinking Test
• Logical Reasoning Test
• Spatial Reasoning Test
• Technical Aptitude Test
• Inductive Reasoning Test
• Analytical Reasoning Test
• Deductive Reasoning Test
• Mechanical Reasoning Test
• Non-Verbal Reasoning Tests
• Diagrammatic Reasoning Test
• Concentration Assessment Test
• Finance Reasoning Aptitude Test
• Fault Finding (Fault Diagnosis) Test
• Senior Management Aptitude Tests
• Error Checking Tests
• In-Basket Exercise

What Is Critical Thinking?

Who uses critical thinking tests and why, how to prepare for a critical thinking test in 2024, final thoughts, critical thinking tests (2024 guide).

Updated November 18, 2023

Critical thinking is the ability to scrutinize evidence using intellectual skills. Reflective skills are employed to reach clear, coherent and logical conclusions – rather than just accepting information as it is provided.

Critical thinking tests measure the candidate’s understanding of logical connections between ideas, the strength of an argument, alternate interpretations and the significance of a particular claim.

A major facet of critical thinking is the ability to separate facts from opinions and work against any subconscious bias.

In critical thinking tests, employers are looking for people who can think critically about information, showing they are open-minded, good problem-solvers and excellent decision-makers.

Critical thinking tests assess how well a candidate can analyze and reason when presented with specific information.

They are used as part of the application process in several industries, most commonly for professions where employees would need to use advanced judgment and analysis skills in decision-making.

For example:

Academic applications – In some instances, critical thinking tests are used to assess whether prospective students have the skills required to be successful in higher education.

Law – Critical thinking assessments are often used in the legal sector as part of the application process. In many law positions, facts are more important than opinion, subconscious bias or pre-existing ideas so an applicant needs to be skilled in critical thinking.

Finance – In financial institutions, decisions often need to be made based on facts rather than emotion or opinion. Judgments made in banking need to be skilled decisions based on logic and the strength of data and information – so to be successful, candidates need to demonstrate that they will not accept arguments and conclusions at face value.

Graduate roles – In some sectors, critical thinking tests are used in graduate recruitment because they are considered to be predictors of ability.

With several different tests available, suited to different industries, many top-level jobs are likely to include critical thinking assessments as part of the application process.

Critical Thinking Tests Explained

Critical thinking tests are usually presented in a similar format no matter who the publisher is. A paragraph of information and data is given, with a statement that is under scrutiny.

Multiple-choice answers are presented for each statement, and there may be more than one question about the same paragraph.

While each question is presented in the same way, different aspects of critical thinking are assessed throughout the test.

Assessing Assumptions

For this type of question, there may be something ‘taken for granted’ in the information provided – and it might not be explicitly stated.

The candidate needs to evaluate the scenario and conclude whether any assumptions are present. The statement below the scenario may or may not support the statement and the answer selection will be about whether the stated assumption is made or not made in the scenario.

Example Question for Assessing Assumptions

Practice Critical Thinking Test with JobTestPrep

The mainstream media presents information that is supported by the political party in power.

Assumption: The information that the mainstream media presents is always correct.

a) Assumption made b) Assumption not made

Determining Inferences

Following a paragraph of information containing evidence, you will be presented with an inference and need to assess whether the inference is absolutely true, possibly true, possibly false, absolutely false, or it is not possible to reach a decision.

An inference is a conclusion that can be reached based on logical reasoning from the information. Although all the evidence to support (or not support) the inference is included in the passage, it will not be obvious or explicitly stated, which makes the inference harder to conclude.

Example Question for Determining Inferences

It has been snowing all night and there is thick snow on the ground. Today’s weather is sunny and bright.

Inference: The snow will melt today.

a) Possibly true b) Absolutely true c) Possibly false d) Absolutely false e) Not possible to reach a decision

Making Deductions

For this type of question, the information presented will be a set of factual statements and the candidate will need to decide if the deduction applies or does not apply.

This logical thinking is a top-down exercise where all the information is provided and needs to be read in the order it is presented.

If statement A = B, does B = C? There should be no grey areas – it either does or does not follow.

Example Question for Making Deductions

All plants have leaves. All leaves are green.

Proposed deduction: All plants are green.

a) Deduction follows b) Deduction does not follow

If you need to prepare for a number of different employment tests and want to outsmart the competition, choose a Premium Membership from JobTestPrep . You will get access to three PrepPacks of your choice, from a database that covers all the major test providers and employers and tailored profession packs.

Get a Premium Package Now

Interpretation of Conclusions

Presented with information, the candidate needs to assess whether a given conclusion is correct based on the evidence provided.

For the purposes of the test, we need to believe that all the information provided in the paragraph is true, even if we have opinions about the correctness of the statement.

Example Question for Interpretation of Conclusions

When cooking a meal, one of the most important things to get right is the balance between major food groups. Satisfaction from a good meal comes from getting the most nutrition and can therefore be attributed to a wide variety of flavors, including vegetables, a good source of protein and carbohydrates. A balanced diet is about more than just everything in moderation and should be considered a scientific process with measuring of ingredients and efficient cooking methods.

Proposed conclusion: The best meals are those that are scientifically prepared.

a) Conclusion follows b) Conclusion does not follow

Evaluation of Arguments (Analysis of Arguments)

In this analysis section, the candidate is presented with a scenario and an argument that might be in favor of the scenario or against it.

The candidate needs to evaluate whether the argument itself is weak or strong. This needs to be based on the relevance to the scenario and whether it accurately addresses the question.

Example Question for Evaluation of Arguments

Should all drugs be made legal?

Proposed argument: No, all drugs are dangerous to everyone.

a) Argument is strong b) Argument is weak

Most Common Critical Thinking Tests in 2024

Watson glaser test.

Watson Glaser is the most commonly used test publisher for critical thinking assessments and is used by many industries.

When sitting a Watson Glaser test, your results will be compared against a sample group of over 1,500 test-takers who are considered representative of graduate-level candidates.

The test is usually 40 questions long, with 30 minutes to answer, but there is a longer version that asks 80 questions with a time limit of an hour.

Who Uses This Test?

The Watson Glaser Test is used in a wide variety of industries for different roles, especially in the legal and banking sectors. Some employers that use the Watson Glaser Test are:

• Bank of England
• Irwin Mitchell
• Simmons & Simmons

What Is the RED model?

The Watson Glaser Test is based on something called the ‘RED model’. The questions in the test are based on:

• Recognizing assumptions
• Evaluating arguments
• Drawing conclusions

The science behind the Watson Glaser Test shows that candidates who show strong critical thinking skills in these areas are more likely to perform well in roles where logical decisions and judgments have to be made.

Where to Take a Free Practice Test

Watson Glaser Tests have a specific layout and format. If you are going to be completing one of the assessments as part of your application, it’s best to practice questions that match the test format.

You can find Watson Glaser practice tests at JobTestPrep as well as a prep pack to give you all the tips, tricks and information you need to make the most of your practice time.

Take a Practice Watson Glaser Test

SHL Critical Reasoning Battery Test

The SHL Critical Reasoning Battery Test includes questions based on numerical, verbal and inductive reasoning. This test is usually used for managerial and supervisory roles, and can include mechanical comprehension if needed for the job role (usually in engineering or mechanical roles).

You can find out more on JobTestPrep’s SHL Critical Reasoning Battery pages .

Take a Practice SHL Test

The Graduate Management Admissions Test (GMAT) is an online adaptive test – using sophisticated algorithms to adjust the difficulty of the questions according to the answers already provided.

Questions include integrated, quantitative and verbal reasoning as well as an analytical writing assessment. The GMAT is widely used to predict performance in business or management programs in more than 1,700 universities and organizations.

Take a Practice GMAT

Preparation is key to success in any pre-employment assessment. While some people think critical reasoning is not a skill you can practice, there are some steps you can take to perform at your best.

Critical thinking tests are straightforward but not necessarily easy.

Step 1 . Consider Buying a Preparation Pack

If you can determine who the publisher is for the test you will take, it may be worthwhile investing in a prep pack from that particular publisher.

JobTestPrep offers prep packs for many major test publishers. These packs include realistic practice tests as well as study guides, tips and tricks to help you build your own question-solving strategies.

Step 2 . Use Practice Tests

Even if you decide not to purchase a prep pack, taking practice tests will help you focus on the areas where you need to improve to be successful.

It is important to find out the publisher of the test you will take because not all critical thinking tests are at the same level and they may not follow the same structure. Timings, answering methodologies and the number of questions will vary between publishers.

You can usually find out the test publisher before you take the assessment by asking the recruiter or searching online.

Step 3 . Practice Under Test Conditions

Critical thinking tests are timed. To give yourself the best chance of achieving a high score, you need to answer the questions quickly and efficiently.

Practicing under test conditions – including the time limit – will help you to understand how much time you need to spend on each question and will help you to develop efficient time management skills for the assessment.

Practicing under test conditions will also help you focus so you can make the most of the session.

Step 4 . Practice Abstract Reasoning

Abstract reasoning is a form of critical thinking that uses logic to form a conclusion. Some abstract reasoning tests are presented as word problems.

Practicing these is a good way to flex critical thinking muscles. You can find practice questions on the Psychometric Success website .

Step 5 . Practice Critical Thinking in Everyday Life

Reading widely, especially non-fiction, is a good way to practice your critical thinking skills in everyday life.

Newspaper articles, scientific or technical journals, and other sources of information present an opportunity to think about:

• The strength of arguments
• The perspective of the author
• Whether there are enough facts presented to draw the conclusion given
• Whether other conclusions could be drawn from the same information

Step 6 . Revise Logical Fallacies

Knowledge of logical fallacies will help you to judge the effectiveness of an argument. Fallacy describes ‘faulty reasoning’ in an argument and is often seen in hyperbole or opinion pieces in newspapers and magazines.

There are many types of fallacy that you might come across, such as:

• Strawman – An argument that doesn’t address the statement.
• False cause – An argument based on a connection that doesn’t exist.
• Ambiguity – An argument using a phrase that is unclear or that may have different meanings.
• Appeal to popularity – An argument that states it must be true because many people believe it.

There are many others, including red herrings, appeal to authority and false dichotomy. Learning these will help you to identify a weak argument.

Step 7 . Focus on Long-Term Practice

Cramming and panicking about a critical thinking assessment is rarely conducive to great performance.

If you are looking for a career in a sector where critical thinking skills are necessary, then long-term practice will have better results when you come to be assessed. Make critical thinking a part of life – so that every day can be a chance to practice recognizing assumptions.

Key Tips for Critical Thinking Test Success

Understand the format of the test and each question type.

Familiarity is important for any assessment, and in critical thinking tests, it is essential that you can recognize what the question is looking for. As mentioned above, this is usually one of the following:

• Assessing assumptions
• Determining inferences
• Making deductions
• Interpreting conclusions

Practice tests will help you become comfortable with the structure and format of the test, including ways to answer, and will also demonstrate what the question types look like.

Read Test Content Carefully

Taking time to read and understand the content provided in the question is important to ensure that you can answer correctly.

The information you need to determine the correct answer will be provided although it might not be explicitly stated. Careful reading is an important part of critical thinking.

Only Use the Information Provided

While some of the information provided in the critical thinking test might be related to the role you are applying for, or about something that you have existing knowledge of, you mustn't use this knowledge during the test.

A facet of critical thinking is avoiding subconscious bias and opinion, so only use the information that is provided to answer the question.

Look Out for Facts and Fallacies

Throughout the critical thinking test, look out for facts and fallacies in the information and arguments provided.

Identifying fallacies will help you decide if an argument is strong and will help you answer questions correctly.

Critical thinking tests are used as pre-employment assessments for jobs that require effective communication, good problem-solving and great decision-making, such as those in the legal sector and banking.

These tests assess the ability of candidates to question and scrutinize evidence, make logical connections between ideas, find alternative interpretations and decide on the strength of an argument.

All critical thinking tests are not the same, but they do have similar question types. Learning what these are and how to answer them will help you perform better. Practicing tests based on the specific publisher of your test will give you the best results.

You might also be interested in these other Psychometric Success articles:

Or explore the Aptitude Tests / Test Types sections.

Get 25% off all test packages.

Get 25% off all test packages!

Click below to get 25% off all test packages.

Critical Thinking Tests

• 228 questions

Critical thinking tests, sometimes known as critical reasoning tests, are often used by employers. They evaluate how a candidate makes logical deductions after scrutinising the evidence provided, while avoiding fallacies or non-factual opinions. Critical thinking tests can form part of an assessment day, or be used as a screening test before an interview.

What is a critical thinking test?

A critical thinking test assesses your ability to use a range of logical skills to evaluate given information and make a judgement. The test is presented in such a way that candidates are expected to quickly scrutinise the evidence presented and decide on the strength of the arguments.

Critical thinking tests show potential employers that you do not just accept data and can avoid subconscious bias and opinions – instead, you can find logical connections between ideas and find alternative interpretations.

This test is usually timed, so quick, clear, logical thinking will help candidates get the best marks. Critical thinking tests are designed to be challenging, and often used as part of the application process for upper-management-level roles.

What does critical thinking mean?

Critical thinking is the intellectual skill set that ensures you can process and consider information, challenge and analyse data, and then reach a conclusion that can be defended and justified.

In the most simple terms, critical reasoning skills will make sure that you are not simply accepting information at face value with little or no supporting evidence.

It also means that you are less likely to be swayed by ‘false news’ or opinions that cannot be backed with facts – which is important in high-level jobs that require logical thinking.

For more information about logical thinking, please see our article all about logical reasoning .

Which professions use critical thinking tests, and why?

Typically, critical thinking tests are taken as part of the application process for jobs that require advanced skills in judgement, analysis and decision making. The higher the position, the more likely that you will need to demonstrate reliable critical reasoning and good logic.

The legal sector is the main industry that uses critical thinking assessments – making decisions based on facts, without opinion and intuition, is vital in legal matters.

A candidate for a legal role needs to demonstrate their intellectual skills in problem-solving without pre-existing knowledge or subconscious bias – and the critical thinking test is a simple and effective way to screen candidates.

Another industry that uses critical thinking tests as part of the recruitment process is banking. In a similar way to the legal sector, those that work in banking are required to make decisions without allowing emotion, intuition or opinion to cloud coherent analysis and conclusions.

Critical thinking tests also sometimes comprise part of the recruitment assessment for graduate and management positions across numerous industries.

The format of the test: which skills are tested?

The test itself, no matter the publisher, is multiple choice.

As a rule, the questions present a paragraph of information for a scenario that may include numerical data. There will then be a statement and a number of possible answers.

The critical thinking test is timed, so decisions need to be made quickly and accurately; in most tests there is a little less than a minute for each question. Having experience of the test structure and what each question is looking for will make the experience smoother for you.

There are typically five separate sections in a critical thinking test, and each section may have multiple questions.

Inference questions assess your ability to judge whether a statement is true, false, or impossible to determine based on the given data and scenario. You usually have five possible answers: absolutely true, absolutely false, possibly true, possibly false, or not possible to determine.

Assumptions

In this section, you are being assessed on your ability to avoid taking things for granted. Each question gives a scenario including data, and you need to evaluate whether there are any assumptions present.

Here you are given a scenario and a number of deductions that may be applicable. You need to assess the given deductions to see which is the logical conclusion – does it follow?

Interpretation

In the interpretation stage, you need to read and analyse a paragraph of information, then interpret a set of possible conclusions, to see which one is correct. You are looking for the conclusion that follows beyond reasonable doubt.

Evaluation of Arguments

In this section, you are given a scenario and a set of arguments that can be for or against. You need to determine which are strong arguments and which are weak, in terms of the information that you have. This decision is made based on the way they address the scenario and how relevant they are to the content.

How best to prepare for a critical thinking test

The best way to prepare for any type of aptitude test is to practice, and critical thinking tests are no different.

Taking practice tests, as mentioned above, will give you confidence as it makes you better understand the structure, layout and timing of the real tests, so you can concentrate on the actual scenarios and questions.

Practice tests should be timed. This will help you get used to working through the scenarios and assessing the conclusions under time constraints – which is a good way to make sure that you perform quickly as well as accurately.

In some thinking skills assessments , a timer will be built in, but you might need to time yourself.

Consistent practice will also enable you to pinpoint any areas of the critical thinking test that require improvement. Our tests offer explanations for each answer, similar to the examples provided above.

Publishers of critical thinking tests

The watson glaser critical thinking test.

The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (W-GCTA) is the most popular and widely used critical thinking test. This test has been in development for 85 years and is published by TalentLens .

The W-GCTA is seen as a successful tool for assessing cognitive abilities, allowing recruiting managers to predict job success, find good managers and identify future leaders. It is available in multiple languages including English, French and Spanish.

The test itself can be used as part of an assessment day or as a screening assessment before an interview. It consists of 40 questions on the 5 sections mentioned above, and is timed at 30 minutes. Click here for more information on Watson Glaser tests .

SHL critical reasoning test

SHL is a major aptitude test publisher, which offers critical thinking as part of its testing battery for pre-employment checks.

SHL tests cover all kinds of behavioural and aptitude tests, from logic to inference, verbal to numerical – and with a number of test batteries available online, they are one of the most popular choices for recruiters.

Cornell critical thinking test

The Cornell critical thinking test was made to test students and first developed in 1985. It is an American system that helps teachers, parents and administrators to confidently predict future performance for college admission, gifted and advanced placement programs, and even career success.

Prepare yourself for leading employers

5 Example critical thinking practice questions with answers

In this section, you need to deduce whether the inferred statement is true, false or impossible to deduce.

The UK Government has published data that shows 82% of people under the age of 30 are not homeowners. A charity that helps homeless people has published data that shows 48% of people that are considered homeless are under 30.

The lack of affordable housing on the sales market is the reason so many under-30s are homeless.

• Definitely True
• Probably True
• Impossible to Deduce
• Probably False
• Definitely False

The information given does not infer the conclusion given, so it is impossible to deduce if the inference is correct – there is just not enough information to judge the inference as correct.

The removal of the five-substitution rule in British football will benefit clubs with a smaller roster.

Clubs with more money would prefer the five-substitute rule to continue.

• Assumption Made

Assumption Not Made

This is an example of a fallacy that could cause confusion for a candidate – it encourages you to bring in any pre-existing knowledge of football clubs.

It would be easy to assume the assumption has been made when you consider that the more money a club has, the more players they should have on the roster. However, the statement does not make the assumption that the clubs with more money would prefer to continue with the five-substitute rule.

All boys love football. Football is a sport, therefore:

• All boys love all sports
• Girls do not love football
• Boys are more likely to choose to play football than any other sport

In this section we are looking for the conclusion that follows the logic of the statement. In this example, we cannot deduce that girls do not love football, because there is not enough information to support that.

In the same way the conclusion that all boys love all sports does not follow – we are not given enough information to make that assumption. So, the conclusion that follows is 3: boys are more likely to choose football than any other sport because all boys like football.

The British Museum has a range of artefacts on display, including the largest privately owned collection of WWII weaponry.

There is a larger privately owned collection of WWII weaponry in the USA.

• Conclusion Follows

Conclusion Does Not Follow

The fact that the collection is in the British Museum does not make a difference to the fact it is the largest private collection – so there cannot be a larger collection elsewhere.

The Department for Education should lower standards in examinations to make it fairer for less able students.

• Yes – top grades are too hard for lower-income students
• No – less fortunate students are not capable of higher standards
• Yes – making the standards lower will benefit all students
• No – private school students will suffer if grade standards are lower
• The strongest argument is the right answer, not the one that you might personally believe.

In this case, we need to assess which argument is most relevant to the statement. Both 1 and 4 refer to students in particular situations, which isn’t relevant to the statement. The same can be said about 2, so the strongest argument is 3, since it is relevant and addresses the statement given.

Within two hours of practice I have improved my score from 50% correct to 88%.

Critical Thinking Tests FAQs

What are the basics of critical thinking.

In essence, critical thinking is the intellectual process of considering information on its merits, and reaching an analysis or conclusion from that information that can be defended and rationalised with evidence.

How do you know if you have good critical thinking skills?

You are likely to be someone with good critical thinking skills if you can build winning arguments; pick holes in someone’s theory if it’s inconsistent with known facts; reflect on the biases inherent in your own experiences and assumptions; and look at problems using a systematic methodology.

Hire better talent

At Neuroworx we help companies build perfect teams

Critical Thinking Tests Tips

The most important factor in your success will be practice. If you have taken some practice tests, not only will you start to recognise the way questions are worded and become familiar with what each question is looking for, you will also be able to find out whether there are any parts that you need extra practice with.

It is important to find out which test you will be taking, as some generic critical thinking practice tests might not help if you are taking specific publisher tests (see the section below).

2 Fact vs fallacy

Practice questions can also help you recognise the difference between fact and fallacy in the test. A fallacy is simply an error or something misleading in the scenario paragraph that encourages you to choose an invalid argument. This might be a presumption or a misconception, but if it isn’t spotted it can make finding the right answer impossible.

3 Ignore what you already know

There is no need for pre-existing knowledge to be brought into the test, so no research is needed. In fact, it is important that you ignore any subconscious bias when you are considering the questions – you need logic and facts to get the correct answer, not intuition or instinct.

4 Read everything carefully

Read all the given information thoroughly. This might sound straightforward, but knowing that the test is timed can encourage candidates to skip content and risk misunderstanding the content or miss crucial details.

During the test itself, you will receive instructions that will help you to understand what is being asked of you on each section. There is likely to be an example question and answer, so ensure you take the time to read them fully.

5 Stay aware of the time you've taken

This test is usually timed, so don’t spend too long on a question. If you feel it is going to take too much time, leave it and come back to it at the end (if you have time). Critical thinking tests are complex by design, so they do have quite generous time limits.

For further advice, check out our full set of tips for critical thinking tests .

Enjoy what you’ve read? Let others know!

• Share on whatsapp
• Share on linkedin
• Share on twitter
• Share on facebook
• Share via email

Try Critical Thinking Tests for Free

Watson glaser 01.

20 Questions | 20 Minutes

Watson Glaser 02

Watson glaser 03, improve your scores with our intelligent learning system, prepare for your watson glaser test.

Immediate access. Cancel anytime.

• 30 Numerical reasoning tests
• 30 Verbal reasoning tests
• 30 Diagrammatic reasoning tests
• 30 Situational judgement tests
• 34 Publisher packages e.g. Watson Glaser
• 252 Employer packages e.g. HSBC
• 29 Extra packages e.g Mechanical
• Dashboard performance tracking
• Full solutions and explanations
• Tips, tricks, guides and resources
• Access to free tests
• Basic performance tracking
• Solutions & explanations
• Tips and resources

Reviews of our Watson Glaser tests

What our customers say about our Watson Glaser tests

Jozef Bailey

United Kingdom

April 05, 2022

Doesn't cover all aspects of Watson-Glaser tests but useful

The WGCTA uses more categories to assess critical thinking, but this was useful for the inference section.

April 01, 2022

Just practicing for an interview

Good information and liked that it had a countdown clock, to give you that real feel in the test situation.

Jerico Kadhir

March 31, 2022

Aptitude test

It was OK, I didn't understand personally whether or not the "cannot say" option was acceptable or not in a lot of the questions, as it may have been a trick option.

Salvarina Viknesuari

March 15, 2022

I like the test because the platform is simple and engaging while the test itself is different than most of the Watson Glaser tests I've taken.

Alexis Sheridan

March 02, 2022

Some of the ratios were harder than I thought!

I like how clear the design and layout is - makes things very easy (even if the content itself is not!)

Cyril Lekgetho

February 17, 2022

Mental arithmetic

I enjoyed the fact that there were multiple questions pertaining to one passage of information, rather than multiple passages. However I would've appreciated a more varied question type.

Madupoju Manish

February 16, 2022

Analytics are the best questions

I like the test because of its time schedule. The way the questions are prepared makes it easy to crack the original test.

Chelsea Franklin

February 02, 2022

Interesting

I haven't done something like this for ages. Very good for the brain - although I certainly experienced some fog whilst doing it.

[email protected]

January 04, 2022

Population/exchange rates were the hardest

Great test as it felt a bit time pressured. Very different types of questions in terms of difficulty.

faezeh tavakoli

January 02, 2022

More attention to detail + be more time conscious

It was asking about daily stuff we all deal with, but as an assessment it's scrutinising how we approach these problems.

By using our website you agree with our Cookie Policy.

How it works

For Business

Join Mind Tools

Article • 8 min read

Critical Thinking

Developing the right mindset and skills.

By the Mind Tools Content Team

We make hundreds of decisions every day and, whether we realize it or not, we're all critical thinkers.

We use critical thinking each time we weigh up our options, prioritize our responsibilities, or think about the likely effects of our actions. It's a crucial skill that helps us to cut out misinformation and make wise decisions. The trouble is, we're not always very good at it!

In this article, we'll explore the key skills that you need to develop your critical thinking skills, and how to adopt a critical thinking mindset, so that you can make well-informed decisions.

What Is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking is the discipline of rigorously and skillfully using information, experience, observation, and reasoning to guide your decisions, actions, and beliefs. You'll need to actively question every step of your thinking process to do it well.

Collecting, analyzing and evaluating information is an important skill in life, and a highly valued asset in the workplace. People who score highly in critical thinking assessments are also rated by their managers as having good problem-solving skills, creativity, strong decision-making skills, and good overall performance. [1]

Key Critical Thinking Skills

Critical thinkers possess a set of key characteristics which help them to question information and their own thinking. Focus on the following areas to develop your critical thinking skills:

Being willing and able to explore alternative approaches and experimental ideas is crucial. Can you think through "what if" scenarios, create plausible options, and test out your theories? If not, you'll tend to write off ideas and options too soon, so you may miss the best answer to your situation.

To nurture your curiosity, stay up to date with facts and trends. You'll overlook important information if you allow yourself to become "blinkered," so always be open to new information.

But don't stop there! Look for opposing views or evidence to challenge your information, and seek clarification when things are unclear. This will help you to reassess your beliefs and make a well-informed decision later. Read our article, Opening Closed Minds , for more ways to stay receptive.

Logical Thinking

You must be skilled at reasoning and extending logic to come up with plausible options or outcomes.

It's also important to emphasize logic over emotion. Emotion can be motivating but it can also lead you to take hasty and unwise action, so control your emotions and be cautious in your judgments. Know when a conclusion is "fact" and when it is not. "Could-be-true" conclusions are based on assumptions and must be tested further. Read our article, Logical Fallacies , for help with this.

Use creative problem solving to balance cold logic. By thinking outside of the box you can identify new possible outcomes by using pieces of information that you already have.

Self-Awareness

Many of the decisions we make in life are subtly informed by our values and beliefs. These influences are called cognitive biases and it can be difficult to identify them in ourselves because they're often subconscious.

Practicing self-awareness will allow you to reflect on the beliefs you have and the choices you make. You'll then be better equipped to challenge your own thinking and make improved, unbiased decisions.

One particularly useful tool for critical thinking is the Ladder of Inference . It allows you to test and validate your thinking process, rather than jumping to poorly supported conclusions.

Developing a Critical Thinking Mindset

Combine the above skills with the right mindset so that you can make better decisions and adopt more effective courses of action. You can develop your critical thinking mindset by following this process:

Gather Information

First, collect data, opinions and facts on the issue that you need to solve. Draw on what you already know, and turn to new sources of information to help inform your understanding. Consider what gaps there are in your knowledge and seek to fill them. And look for information that challenges your assumptions and beliefs.

Be sure to verify the authority and authenticity of your sources. Not everything you read is true! Use this checklist to ensure that your information is valid:

• Are your information sources trustworthy ? (For example, well-respected authors, trusted colleagues or peers, recognized industry publications, websites, blogs, etc.)
• Is the information you have gathered up to date ?
• Has the information received any direct criticism ?
• Does the information have any errors or inaccuracies ?
• Is there any evidence to support or corroborate the information you have gathered?
• Is the information you have gathered subjective or biased in any way? (For example, is it based on opinion, rather than fact? Is any of the information you have gathered designed to promote a particular service or organization?)

If any information appears to be irrelevant or invalid, don't include it in your decision making. But don't omit information just because you disagree with it, or your final decision will be flawed and bias.

Now observe the information you have gathered, and interpret it. What are the key findings and main takeaways? What does the evidence point to? Start to build one or two possible arguments based on what you have found.

You'll need to look for the details within the mass of information, so use your powers of observation to identify any patterns or similarities. You can then analyze and extend these trends to make sensible predictions about the future.

To help you to sift through the multiple ideas and theories, it can be useful to group and order items according to their characteristics. From here, you can compare and contrast the different items. And once you've determined how similar or different things are from one another, Paired Comparison Analysis can help you to analyze them.

The final step involves challenging the information and rationalizing its arguments.

Apply the laws of reason (induction, deduction, analogy) to judge an argument and determine its merits. To do this, it's essential that you can determine the significance and validity of an argument to put it in the correct perspective. Take a look at our article, Rational Thinking , for more information about how to do this.

Once you have considered all of the arguments and options rationally, you can finally make an informed decision.

Afterward, take time to reflect on what you have learned and what you found challenging. Step back from the detail of your decision or problem, and look at the bigger picture. Record what you've learned from your observations and experience.

Critical thinking involves rigorously and skilfully using information, experience, observation, and reasoning to guide your decisions, actions and beliefs. It's a useful skill in the workplace and in life.

You'll need to be curious and creative to explore alternative possibilities, but rational to apply logic, and self-aware to identify when your beliefs could affect your decisions or actions.

You can demonstrate a high level of critical thinking by validating your information, analyzing its meaning, and finally evaluating the argument.

Critical Thinking Infographic

See Critical Thinking represented in our infographic: An Elementary Guide to Critical Thinking .

You've accessed 1 of your 2 free resources.

Get unlimited access

Discover more content

Book Insights

Extreme Teaming: Lessons in Complex, Cross-Sector Leadership

Amy Edmondson and Jean-François Harvey

Who's in the Room?: How Great Leaders Structure and Manage the Teams Around Them

Add comment

Comments (1)

priyanka ghogare

Team Management

Learn the key aspects of managing a team, from building and developing your team, to working with different types of teams, and troubleshooting common problems.

Sign-up to our newsletter

Subscribing to the Mind Tools newsletter will keep you up-to-date with our latest updates and newest resources.

Subscribe now

Business Skills

Personal Development

Leadership and Management

Member Extras

Most Popular

Newest Releases

SWOT Analysis

How to Build a Strong Culture in a Distributed Team

Mind Tools Store

About Mind Tools Content

Discover something new today

Top tips for delegating.

Delegate work to your team members effectively with these top tips

Ten Dos and Don'ts of Change Conversations

Tips for tackling discussions about change

How Emotionally Intelligent Are You?

Boosting Your People Skills

Self-Assessment

What's Your Leadership Style?

Learn About the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Way You Like to Lead

Recommended for you

Starting a new job: three tips for success.

Taking the stress out of settling in

Business Operations and Process Management

Strategy Tools

Customer Service

Business Ethics and Values

Handling Information and Data

Project Management

Knowledge Management

Self-Development and Goal Setting

Time Management

Presentation Skills

Learning Skills

Career Skills

Communication Skills

Negotiation, Persuasion and Influence

Working With Others

Difficult Conversations

Creativity Tools

Self-Management

Work-Life Balance

Stress Management and Wellbeing

Coaching and Mentoring

Change Management

Managing Conflict

Delegation and Empowerment

Performance Management

Leadership Skills

Developing Your Team

Talent Management

Problem Solving

Decision Making

Member Podcast

What is the Critical Thinking Test?

Critical thinking practice test, take a free practice critical thinking test, practice critical thinking test.

Updated November 16, 2023

The Critical Thinking Test is a comprehensive evaluation designed to assess individuals' cognitive capacities and analytical prowess.

This formal examination, often referred to as the critical thinking assessment, is a benchmark for those aiming to demonstrate their proficiency in discernment and problem-solving.

In addition, this evaluative tool meticulously gauges a range of skills, including logical reasoning, analytical thinking, and the ability to evaluate and synthesize information.

This article will embark on an exploration of the Critical Thinking Test, elucidating its intricacies and elucidating its paramount importance. We will dissect the essential skills it measures and clarify its significance in gauging one's intellectual aptitude.

We will examine examples of critical thinking questions, illuminating the challenging scenarios that candidates encounter prompting them to navigate the complexities of thought with finesse.

Before going ahead to take the critical thinking test, let's delve into the realm of preparation. This segment serves as a crucible for honing the skills assessed in the actual examination, offering candidates a chance to refine their analytical blades before facing the real challenge. Here are some skills that will help you with the critical thinking assessment: Logical Reasoning: The practice test meticulously evaluates your ability to deduce conclusions from given information, assess the validity of arguments, and recognize patterns in logic. Analytical Thinking: Prepare to dissect complex scenarios, identify key components, and synthesize information to draw insightful conclusions—a fundamental aspect of the critical thinking assessment. Problem-Solving Proficiency: Navigate through intricate problems that mirror real-world challenges, honing your capacity to approach issues systematically and derive effective solutions. What to Expect: The Critical Thinking Practice Test is crafted to mirror the format and complexity of the actual examination. Expect a series of scenarios, each accompanied by a set of questions that demand thoughtful analysis and logical deduction. These scenarios span diverse fields, from business and science to everyday scenarios, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of your critical thinking skills. Examples of Critical Thinking Questions Scenario: In a business context, analyze the potential impacts of a proposed strategy on both short-term profitability and long-term sustainability. Question: What factors would you consider in determining the viability of the proposed strategy, and how might it affect the company's overall success? Scenario: Evaluate conflicting scientific studies on a pressing environmental issue.

Question: Identify the key methodologies and data points in each study. How would you reconcile the disparities to form an informed, unbiased conclusion?

Why Practice Matters

Engaging in the Critical Thinking Practice Test familiarizes you with the test format and cultivates a mindset geared towards agile and astute reasoning. This preparatory phase allows you to refine your cognitive toolkit, ensuring you approach the assessment with confidence and finesse.

We'll navigate through specific examples as we proceed, offering insights into effective strategies for tackling critical thinking questions. Prepare to embark on a journey of intellectual sharpening, where each practice question refines your analytical prowess for the challenges ahead.

This is a practice critical thinking test.

The test consists of three questions . 

After you have answered all the questions, you will be shown the correct answers and given full explanations.

Make sure you read and fully understand each question before answering. Work quickly, but don't rush. You cannot afford to make mistakes on a real test .

If you get a question wrong, make sure you find out why and learn how to answer this type of question in the future. 

Six friends are seated in a restaurant across a rectangular table. There are three chairs on each side. Adam and Dorky do not have anyone sitting to their right and Clyde and Benjamin do not have anyone sitting to their left. Adam and Benjamin are not sitting on the same side of the table.

If Ethan is not sitting next to Dorky, who is seated immediately to the left of Felix?

You might also be interested in these other PRT articles:

• A Model for the National Assessment of Higher Order Thinking
• International Critical Thinking Essay Test
• Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts Test
• Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts Sample Test

Consequential Validity: Using Assessment to Drive Instruction

Translate this page from English...

*Machine translated pages not guaranteed for accuracy. Click Here for our professional translations.

Critical Thinking Testing and Assessment

The purpose of assessment in instruction is improvement. The purpose of assessing instruction for critical thinking is improving the teaching of discipline-based thinking (historical, biological, sociological, mathematical, etc.) It is to improve students’ abilities to think their way through content using disciplined skill in reasoning. The more particular we can be about what we want students to learn about critical thinking, the better we can devise instruction with that particular end in view.

The Foundation for Critical Thinking offers assessment instruments which share in the same general goal: to enable educators to gather evidence relevant to determining the extent to which instruction is teaching students to think critically (in the process of learning content). To this end, the Fellows of the Foundation recommend:

that academic institutions and units establish an oversight committee for critical thinking, and

that this oversight committee utilizes a combination of assessment instruments (the more the better) to generate incentives for faculty, by providing them with as much evidence as feasible of the actual state of instruction for critical thinking.

The following instruments are available to generate evidence relevant to critical thinking teaching and learning:

Course Evaluation Form : Provides evidence of whether, and to what extent, students perceive faculty as fostering critical thinking in instruction (course by course). Machine-scoreable.

Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts Test : Provides evidence of whether, and to what extent, students understand the fundamental concepts embedded in critical thinking (and hence tests student readiness to think critically). Machine-scoreable.

Critical Thinking Reading and Writing Test : Provides evidence of whether, and to what extent, students can read closely and write substantively (and hence tests students' abilities to read and write critically). Short-answer.

International Critical Thinking Essay Test : Provides evidence of whether, and to what extent, students are able to analyze and assess excerpts from textbooks or professional writing. Short-answer.

Commission Study Protocol for Interviewing Faculty Regarding Critical Thinking : Provides evidence of whether, and to what extent, critical thinking is being taught at a college or university. Can be adapted for high school. Based on the California Commission Study . Short-answer.

Protocol for Interviewing Faculty Regarding Critical Thinking : Provides evidence of whether, and to what extent, critical thinking is being taught at a college or university. Can be adapted for high school. Short-answer.

Protocol for Interviewing Students Regarding Critical Thinking : Provides evidence of whether, and to what extent, students are learning to think critically at a college or university. Can be adapted for high school). Short-answer. 

Criteria for Critical Thinking Assignments : Can be used by faculty in designing classroom assignments, or by administrators in assessing the extent to which faculty are fostering critical thinking.

Rubrics for Assessing Student Reasoning Abilities : A useful tool in assessing the extent to which students are reasoning well through course content.  

All of the above assessment instruments can be used as part of pre- and post-assessment strategies to gauge development over various time periods.

Consequential Validity

All of the above assessment instruments, when used appropriately and graded accurately, should lead to a high degree of consequential validity. In other words, the use of the instruments should cause teachers to teach in such a way as to foster critical thinking in their various subjects. In this light, for students to perform well on the various instruments, teachers will need to design instruction so that students can perform well on them. Students cannot become skilled in critical thinking without learning (first) the concepts and principles that underlie critical thinking and (second) applying them in a variety of forms of thinking: historical thinking, sociological thinking, biological thinking, etc. Students cannot become skilled in analyzing and assessing reasoning without practicing it. However, when they have routine practice in paraphrasing, summariz­ing, analyzing, and assessing, they will develop skills of mind requisite to the art of thinking well within any subject or discipline, not to mention thinking well within the various domains of human life.

For full copies of this and many other critical thinking articles, books, videos, and more, join us at the Center for Critical Thinking Community Online - the world's leading online community dedicated to critical thinking!   Also featuring interactive learning activities, study groups, and even a social media component, this learning platform will change your conception of intellectual development.

• Search Search Search …
• Search Search …

How to Prepare for a Critical Thinking Test: Effective Strategies and Tips

Preparing for a critical thinking test can be challenging, as it requires you to use your intellectual skills to critically analyze evidence and reach logical conclusions. Critical thinking tests, sometimes known as critical reasoning tests, are often used by employers to evaluate how a candidate makes logical deductions after scrutinizing the evidence provided, while avoiding fallacies or non-factual opinions.

Understanding the fundamentals of critical thinking tests and familiarizing yourself with the types of questions you may encounter can greatly improve your chances of success. Additionally, consistent practice, mastering the art of deduction, and learning how to evaluate evidence effectively will also help you perform well on a critical thinking test.

Key Takeaways

• Familiarize yourself with the fundamentals and types of questions in a critical thinking test.
• Practice regularly and hone your deduction and evidence evaluation skills.
• Understand the relevance and application of critical thinking tests in various sectors.

Understanding Critical Thinking

Critical thinking skills.

Critical thinking is the ability to scrutinize evidence using intellectual skills and reflective abilities to reach clear, coherent, and logical conclusions, rather than just accepting information as it is provided 1 . It involves a range of logical skills that are essential for effective decision-making and problem-solving. Some of the key critical thinking skills include:

• Analyzing and evaluating information : Breaking down complex ideas, evaluating the quality of the information, and determining the relevance of various pieces of information.
• Identifying arguments and assumptions : Recognizing the structure of an argument, identifying hidden assumptions, and evaluating the strength of the underlying premises.
• Logical reasoning : Applying rules of logic and reasoning to make valid inferences and deductions based on provided information.
• Creative problem-solving : Thinking out of the box and using non-conventional methods to find new solutions to problems.
• Open-mindedness : Being willing to consider alternative perspectives and approaches, and resisting confirmation bias by questioning your own beliefs and assumptions.

Strategies to Enhance Critical Thinking Ability

Developing strong critical thinking skills requires practice and active engagement. Here are a few strategies to enhance your critical thinking abilities:

• Question everything : Cultivate curiosity by asking questions about what you read, hear, and observe.
• Practice active listening : Pay attention to the speaker and try to understand their perspective.
• Be aware of cognitive biases : Familiarize yourself with common biases and consciously try to avoid them.
• Develop reflective thinking : Reflect on your thoughts, beliefs, and assumptions to understand how they shape your decisions and actions.
• Exercise your brain : Engage in activities that challenge your mind, such as solving puzzles, learning new skills, or reading widely.

By incorporating these strategies into your daily life, you can improve your critical thinking skills to better prepare for critical thinking tests and be more effective in decision-making and problem-solving scenarios.

• Psychometric Success – Critical Thinking Tests ↩

Fundamentals of Critical Thinking Test

Evaluation of arguments.

Critical thinking tests assess an individual’s ability to evaluate arguments from various perspectives. Candidates are often required to decipher underlying assumptions, identify logical inconsistencies, and draw accurate conclusions from the provided information. A well-prepared candidate can understand the evidence and draw logical and coherent conclusions, rejecting any false or misleading information.

Types of Critical Thinking Tests

There are different types of critical thinking tests available online, covering a range of question formats and testing methods. Some tests focus on analyzing written passages, while others present the information in diagrams or charts. Most tests evaluate an individual’s ability to:

• Identify, understand, and evaluate assumptions
• Draw inferences and determine the validity of conclusions
• Evaluate the strength and relevance of arguments

Regardless of the test format, candidates need to be familiar with the structure and know how to approach each question type effectively.

Importance of Critical Thinking Tests for Employers

For employers, critical thinking tests play a vital role in the application process. Employers use these tests to assess a candidate’s ability to scrutinize evidence, make logical deductions, and avoid fallacies or non-factual opinions. This evaluation is essential in deciding whether an individual is suitable for a role that requires complex decision-making, troubleshooting, or problem-solving skills.

Overall, the fundamentals of critical thinking tests revolve around the ability to evaluate arguments, understand various test types, and recognize their significance in the employment process. Aspiring candidates should sharpen their critical thinking skills and acquaint themselves with different question formats to excel in these tests.

Guidelines to Prepare for the Test

Assessing and recognizing assumptions.

Before taking a critical thinking test, it’s essential to understand the importance of recognizing underlying assumptions in various scenarios. An argument may seem valid on the surface, but assumptions that have not been justified can weaken it. To prepare, practice identifying assumptions by evaluating different arguments and assessing the logical connections between them. Recognizing assumptions is crucial for making logical decisions during the test.

Drawing Logical Conclusions

A critical component of critical thinking is drawing logical conclusions based on the information provided. To master this skill, begin with analyzing different scenarios and identifying the relevant details. This process involves making inferences and connecting multiple pieces of information to arrive at a sound conclusion. Engage in activities that challenge your interpretation and decision-making abilities, as these skills will be beneficial on assessment day.

Implementing Problem Solving Techniques

Problem solving is an integral part of critical thinking tests. To strengthen your problem-solving capabilities, start by working on various multiple-choice questions that require analytical thinking. Identify the best course of action and always consider the possible consequences. Additionally, practice working under a time limit to become more efficient and precise in your methods. Establishing a systematic approach to problem solving will greatly enhance your performance on the test.

Sharpening Deduction Skills

Deduction is the process of making specific conclusions based on general principles. To improve your deduction skills, practice working on exercises that involve multiple-choice questions and scenarios where you must draw logical connections. Focus on understanding the fundamental principles and reasoning behind each situation. This will enable you to make informed and logical decisions during the test.

In conclusion, enhancing your critical thinking skills requires diligent practice and an understanding of key principles. By following the guidelines above, you can confidently prepare for the test and emerge with a strong foundation in critical thinking.

Critical Thinking Tests in Different Sectors

Critical thinking in the legal sector.

In the legal sector, critical thinking tests play a significant role in assessing job applicants. One popular test used for this purpose is the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal . This test evaluates a candidate’s ability to think logically and analytically while avoiding subconscious biases.

Lawyers are often expected to efficiently analyze complex situations and make logical deductions based on the evidence they gather. This skill is invaluable for law professionals, which is why companies prefer administering critical thinking skill tests for hiring purposes.

Critical Thinking in the Banking Sector

The banking sector similarly places great importance on critical thinking abilities. SHL Critical Reasoning Battery is commonly utilized in the banking industry to assess candidates’ logical reasoning and decision-making skills. You can practice critical thinking tests here .

Banks need employees who can make well-founded decisions and effectively handle intricate financial scenarios. Assessing critical thinking skills during recruitment ensures that companies hire professionals with the ability to make rational choices and excel in their roles.

In both sectors, it is crucial for candidates to undergo critical thinking tests to demonstrate their ability to think logically and analytically, contributing to the overall success of the organization.

Relevant Psychometric Assessments

When preparing for a critical thinking test, it is important to familiarize yourself with relevant psychometric assessments that employers might use to evaluate your cognitive abilities. Two widely known assessments are the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery .

Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal

The Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal is a popular psychometric test that measures an individual’s ability to interpret, analyze, and evaluate information. This test helps employers assess a candidate’s critical thinking skills, which are essential for problem-solving and decision-making in various roles.

The Watson Glaser test covers five main areas:

• Recognition of assumptions
• Interpretation
• Evaluation of arguments

By understanding these categories and practicing relevant questions, you can effectively prepare for the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and showcase your ability to think critically.

SHL Critical Reasoning Battery

Another important test to be aware of is the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery . This assessment evaluates a candidate’s aptitude for logical reasoning and analysis, focusing on their ability to identify alternative interpretations and make well-informed decisions.

The SHL Critical Reasoning Battery typically includes three types of assessments:

• Verbal reasoning
• Numerical reasoning
• Inductive reasoning

Each type of assessment measures different cognitive abilities, making it necessary for candidates to practice and develop their skills in all three areas to perform well during the test.

In conclusion, preparing for a critical thinking test requires understanding the relevant psychometric assessments, such as the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery. By focusing on the specific categories and cognitive abilities assessed in these tests, you can improve your critical thinking skills and increase your chances of success in the recruitment process.

Approach to Sample Questions

Interpreting information.

When preparing for a critical thinking test, it is essential to practice interpreting information. This skill involves the ability to understand and analyze the given data in order to draw logical conclusions. To enhance your interpretation skills, consider different question formats as well as various types of data, such as charts, tables, and passages. By exposing yourself to diverse information, you’ll improve your capability to discern what is relevant and make informed decisions.

Evaluating Arguments

Another critical component of preparing for a critical thinking test is evaluating arguments. This process requires analyzing an argument’s structure, as well as its strengths and weaknesses. In particular, focus on the argument’s premises, conclusions, and underlying assumptions. In order to develop the necessary evaluation skills, practice dissecting various arguments and maintain a neutral, objective mindset. This will enable you to discern whether the argument is valid, sound, or flawed.

Recognizing Assumptions

Recognizing assumptions is a crucial aspect of critical thinking, as it involves identifying biases, values, and beliefs underlying the presented information. Make a habit of questioning assumptions and considering alternative viewpoints. As you practice recognizing assumptions, challenge yourself to consider counterarguments and explore different perspectives. Developing this skill will enable you to approach sample questions with a more open mind and balanced judgment.

Practice Tests

Taking practice tests is an invaluable method of preparing for critical thinking exams. Practice tests expose you to a variety of question types, allowing you to get a feel for the format and structure of the test. Furthermore, practice tests provide you with the opportunity to identify areas for improvement and monitor your progress. By dedicating time to practicing test questions and analyzing your results, you can enhance your critical reasoning skills and better prepare yourself for the actual exam.

Remember, your raw score will be compared to a norm group to determine your relative performance in higher education or employment settings. By following these guidelines for interpreting information, evaluating arguments, recognizing assumptions, and taking practice tests, you will be well-equipped to excel in critical thinking tests, demonstrating your ability to make sound judgments.

Preparing for a critical thinking test involves a combination of honing your intellectual and reflective skills. One key aspect is to practice regularly with different test assessments to familiarize yourself with the format and question types.

When working on test questions, focus on understanding the context and read the given information thoroughly. Be particularly attentive to the question’s phrasing, as misinterpretation could lead to incorrect answers. Remind yourself to be cautious of assumptions, and check for logical fallacies in both the presented information and your own thought process.

Develop a habit of staying organized and ensuring your reasoning is coherent. In cases where creative problem-solving is needed, balance cold logic with out-of-the-box thinking. Self-awareness and a neutral, clear mindset can significantly improve your critical thinking abilities .

Lastly, persistence and dedication are crucial in refining your critical thinking skills. Be prepared to invest time and effort into this process, and do not become disheartened if you face difficulties along the way. Remember to learn from your mistakes, adapt your strategies, and you will undoubtedly see progress in your critical thinking capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key elements to focus on while practicing.

To prepare for a critical thinking test effectively, it’s important to focus on a few key elements while practicing. These include evaluating arguments, assessing evidence, understanding the structure and logic of an argument, and ensuring that emotions or personal opinions do not influence conclusions. Along with these elements, improving one’s problem-solving skills is crucial for success in the test.

How can one improve problem-solving skills?

Improving problem-solving skills involves breaking down complex problems into manageable components, identifying the root cause of a problem, and developing a systematic approach to find the solution. Practicing brain-teasers, puzzles, and logical reasoning questions can help sharpen these skills, making it easier to tackle critical thinking problems on the test.

What are the best sources for critical thinking test samples?

The best sources for critical thinking test samples are reputable websites and platforms that offer practice tests and resources tailored to the specific critical thinking test format. Some examples include Psychometric Success , Practice Aptitude Tests , and Practice4Me . These platforms offer sample questions, tips, and techniques to help candidates familiarize themselves with the test format and content.

How essential is time management in critical thinking tests?

Time management is an important aspect of critical thinking tests, as candidates are often required to solve problems and analyze situations within a limited timeframe. Developing efficient time management skills can help test-takers allocate appropriate time for each question, avoid spending too long on a single problem, and ensure that they have enough time to complete the entire test.

What strategies can be employed to enhance logical reasoning?

To enhance logical reasoning capabilities, candidates can practice understanding relationships between different statements, identifying assumptions and premises, and deducing conclusions from given information. Engaging in activities such as solving puzzles, participating in debates, and analyzing deductive and inductive reasoning can also help to further develop logical reasoning skills.

How can one effectively analyze arguments during the test?

Analyzing arguments effectively during a critical thinking test involves evaluating the evidence presented, understanding the structure of the argument, determining the validity of the argument, and identifying potential fallacies or biased reasoning. To achieve this, test-takers should practice critically analyzing various types of arguments, focusing on the logical and evidentiary components, and maintaining a neutral and objective viewpoint throughout the process.

You may also like

What is historical thinking?

Historical thinking is something that more and more people are taking an interest in, but do you know what it really means? […]

Critical thinking and Cyber security (How to protect your personal information online)

Whenever a job vacancy in cyber security is posted, you will always see one of the job requirements as ‘critical thinking’. Honestly, […]

The Basics of Using Critical Thinking in Business

In the world of business, being precise and careful is highly recommended. However, how often do you respond too rashly to a […]

The Benefits of Associative Thinking for Creative and Innovative Minds

Associative thinking is a powerful tool that can be used to enhance creativity and innovation. It involves linking concepts from memory to […]

A Crash Course in Critical Thinking

What you need to know—and read—about one of the essential skills needed today..

Posted April 8, 2024 | Reviewed by Michelle Quirk

• In research for "A More Beautiful Question," I did a deep dive into the current crisis in critical thinking.
• Many people may think of themselves as critical thinkers, but they actually are not.
• Here is a series of questions you can ask yourself to try to ensure that you are thinking critically.

Conspiracy theories. Inability to distinguish facts from falsehoods. Widespread confusion about who and what to believe.

These are some of the hallmarks of the current crisis in critical thinking—which just might be the issue of our times. Because if people aren’t willing or able to think critically as they choose potential leaders, they’re apt to choose bad ones. And if they can’t judge whether the information they’re receiving is sound, they may follow faulty advice while ignoring recommendations that are science-based and solid (and perhaps life-saving).

Moreover, as a society, if we can’t think critically about the many serious challenges we face, it becomes more difficult to agree on what those challenges are—much less solve them.

On a personal level, critical thinking can enable you to make better everyday decisions. It can help you make sense of an increasingly complex and confusing world.

In the new expanded edition of my book A More Beautiful Question ( AMBQ ), I took a deep dive into critical thinking. Here are a few key things I learned.

First off, before you can get better at critical thinking, you should understand what it is. It’s not just about being a skeptic. When thinking critically, we are thoughtfully reasoning, evaluating, and making decisions based on evidence and logic. And—perhaps most important—while doing this, a critical thinker always strives to be open-minded and fair-minded . That’s not easy: It demands that you constantly question your assumptions and biases and that you always remain open to considering opposing views.

In today’s polarized environment, many people think of themselves as critical thinkers simply because they ask skeptical questions—often directed at, say, certain government policies or ideas espoused by those on the “other side” of the political divide. The problem is, they may not be asking these questions with an open mind or a willingness to fairly consider opposing views.

When people do this, they’re engaging in “weak-sense critical thinking”—a term popularized by the late Richard Paul, a co-founder of The Foundation for Critical Thinking . “Weak-sense critical thinking” means applying the tools and practices of critical thinking—questioning, investigating, evaluating—but with the sole purpose of confirming one’s own bias or serving an agenda.

In AMBQ , I lay out a series of questions you can ask yourself to try to ensure that you’re thinking critically. Here are some of the questions to consider:

• Why do I believe what I believe?
• Are my views based on evidence?
• Have I fairly and thoughtfully considered differing viewpoints?
• Am I truly open to changing my mind?

Of course, becoming a better critical thinker is not as simple as just asking yourself a few questions. Critical thinking is a habit of mind that must be developed and strengthened over time. In effect, you must train yourself to think in a manner that is more effortful, aware, grounded, and balanced.

For those interested in giving themselves a crash course in critical thinking—something I did myself, as I was working on my book—I thought it might be helpful to share a list of some of the books that have shaped my own thinking on this subject. As a self-interested author, I naturally would suggest that you start with the new 10th-anniversary edition of A More Beautiful Question , but beyond that, here are the top eight critical-thinking books I’d recommend.

The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark , by Carl Sagan

This book simply must top the list, because the late scientist and author Carl Sagan continues to be such a bright shining light in the critical thinking universe. Chapter 12 includes the details on Sagan’s famous “baloney detection kit,” a collection of lessons and tips on how to deal with bogus arguments and logical fallacies.

Clear Thinking: Turning Ordinary Moments Into Extraordinary Results , by Shane Parrish

The creator of the Farnham Street website and host of the “Knowledge Project” podcast explains how to contend with biases and unconscious reactions so you can make better everyday decisions. It contains insights from many of the brilliant thinkers Shane has studied.

Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World , by David Robert Grimes

A brilliant, comprehensive 2021 book on critical thinking that, to my mind, hasn’t received nearly enough attention . The scientist Grimes dissects bad thinking, shows why it persists, and offers the tools to defeat it.

Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know , by Adam Grant

Intellectual humility—being willing to admit that you might be wrong—is what this book is primarily about. But Adam, the renowned Wharton psychology professor and bestselling author, takes the reader on a mind-opening journey with colorful stories and characters.

Think Like a Detective: A Kid's Guide to Critical Thinking , by David Pakman

The popular YouTuber and podcast host Pakman—normally known for talking politics —has written a terrific primer on critical thinking for children. The illustrated book presents critical thinking as a “superpower” that enables kids to unlock mysteries and dig for truth. (I also recommend Pakman’s second kids’ book called Think Like a Scientist .)

Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters , by Steven Pinker

The Harvard psychology professor Pinker tackles conspiracy theories head-on but also explores concepts involving risk/reward, probability and randomness, and correlation/causation. And if that strikes you as daunting, be assured that Pinker makes it lively and accessible.

How Minds Change: The Surprising Science of Belief, Opinion and Persuasion , by David McRaney

David is a science writer who hosts the popular podcast “You Are Not So Smart” (and his ideas are featured in A More Beautiful Question ). His well-written book looks at ways you can actually get through to people who see the world very differently than you (hint: bludgeoning them with facts definitely won’t work).

A Healthy Democracy's Best Hope: Building the Critical Thinking Habit , by M Neil Browne and Chelsea Kulhanek

Neil Browne, author of the seminal Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking, has been a pioneer in presenting critical thinking as a question-based approach to making sense of the world around us. His newest book, co-authored with Chelsea Kulhanek, breaks down critical thinking into “11 explosive questions”—including the “priors question” (which challenges us to question assumptions), the “evidence question” (focusing on how to evaluate and weigh evidence), and the “humility question” (which reminds us that a critical thinker must be humble enough to consider the possibility of being wrong).

Warren Berger is a longtime journalist and author of A More Beautiful Question .

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Support Group
• International
• New Zealand
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Therapy Center NEW
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Understanding what emotional intelligence looks like and the steps needed to improve it could light a path to a more emotionally adept world.

• Coronavirus Disease 2019
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

Critical Thinking Test Practice ▷ Free Critical Reasoning Samples & Tips 2024

Start Preparing for Your Critical Thinking Test.  This page features a brief introduction, followed by question examples with detailed explanations, and a free test sample.

Table of Contents :

✻  What is a Critical Thinking Test ?

✻  Sample Questions

Related links

✻  Free Critical Thinking Practice Test

✻  Watson Glaser Practice Test

What Is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking, also known as critical reasoning, is the ability to assess a situation and consider/understand various perspectives, all while acknowledging, extracting and deciphering facts, opinions and assumptions. Critical thinking tests are a sub-type of aptitude exams  or psychometric tests used in pre-employment assessment for jobs reacquiring advanced analytical and learning skills.

The Skills You Will Be Tested On

Critical thinking tests can have 5 major sections or sub-tests that assess and measure a variety of aspects.

1) Inference

In this section, you are asked to draw conclusions from observed or supposed facts. You are presented with a short text containing a set of facts you should consider as true.

Below the text is a statement that could be inferred from the text. You need to make a judgement on whether this statement is valid or not, based on what you have read.

Furthermore, you are asked to evaluate whether the statement is true, probably true, there is insufficient data to determine, probably false, or false.

For example:  if a baby is crying and it is his feeding time, you may infer that the baby is hungry. However, the baby may be crying for other reasons—perhaps it is hot.

2) Recognising Assumptions

In this section, you are asked to recognise whether an assumption is justifiable or not.

Here you are given a statement followed by an assumption on that statement. You need to establish whether this assumption can be supported by the statement or not.

You are being tested on your ability to avoid taking things for granted that are not necessarily true. For example, you may say, "I’ll have the same job in three months," but you would be taking for granted the fact that your workplace won't make you redundant, or that you won’t decide to quit and explore various other possibilities.

You are asked to choose between the options of assumption made and assumption not made.

3) Deduction

This section tests your ability to weigh information and decide whether given conclusions are warranted.

You are presented with a statement of facts followed by a conclusion on what you have read. For example, you may be told, "Nobody in authority can avoid making uncomfortable decisions."

You must then decide whether a statement such as "All people must make uncomfortable decisions" is warranted from the first statement.

You need to assess whether the conclusion follows or the conclusion does not follow what is contained in the statement. You can read more about our  deductive logical thinking test  resources here. 

4) Interpretation

This section measures your ability to understand the weighing of different arguments on a particular question or issue.

You are given a short paragraph to read, which you are expected to take as true. This paragraph is followed by a suggested conclusion, for which you must decide if it follows beyond a reasonable doubt.

You have the choice of conclusion follows and conclusion does not follow.

5) Evaluation of Arguments

In this section you are asked to evaluate the strength of an argument.

You are given a question followed by an argument. The argument is considered to be true, but you must decide whether it is a strong or weak argument, i.e. whether it is both important and directly related to the question.

Create Your Custom Assessment Prep Kit

Job-seeking can be a long and frustrating process that can take months, involving several pre-employment tests or interviews. To guide you through it we offer a Premium Membership:

❶ Join our Premium Membership plan at 50% Discount.

❷ Select 3 PrepPacks of your choice from 100+ Packs. 

❸ Access your practice for 1/3/6 months.

Critical Thinking Question Examples

As there are various forms of critical thinking and critical reasoning, we've provided a number of critical thinking sample questions.

You can take our full Critical Thinking Sample Test to see more questions.

Argument Analysis Sample Question

Which of the following is true?

• Most of the people surveyed, whether they own pets or do not own pets, displayed outstanding interpersonal capacities.
• The adoption of a pet involves personal sacrifice and occasional inconvenience.
• People with high degrees of empathy are more likely to adopt pets than people with low degrees of empathy.
• Interpersonal capacities entail tuning in to all the little signals necessary to operate as a couple.
• A person's degree of empathy is highly correlated with his or her capacity for personal sacrifice.

The correct answer is C

Answer explanation: In a question of this type, the rule is very simple: the main conclusion of an argument is found either in the first or the last sentence. If, however, the main conclusion appears in the middle of an argument, it will begin with a signal word such as thus, therefore, or so. Regardless of where the main conclusion appears, the rest of the passage will give the reasons why the conclusion is true or should be adopted. The main conclusion in this passage is the last sentence, signaled by the words, 'This indicates that people who are especially empathetic are more likely to adopt a pet than people who are less empathetic'.

Argument Practice Sample Question

A: No. Differential bonuses have been found to create a hostile working environment, which leads to a decrease in the quality and quantity of products .

This argument is:

The correct answer is A (Strong)

Schema of the statement: Differential cash bonuses (productivity↑) → workplace↑

Explanation: This argument targets both the action and the consequences of the action on the object of the statement. It states that the action (implementing differential cash bonuses) has a negative effect on the workplace (a decrease in the quality and quantity of products). Therefore, it is an important argument, one that is relevant for the workplace. Note that this argument does not specifically target differential cash bonuses. Still, they are considered a sub-group of the subject of the argument (differential bonuses).

Interpretations Sample Question

Proposed assumption: Vicki and Bill encountered a personal battle because they couldn’t come to terms with their disease.

A. Conclusion follows

B. Conclusion does not follow

The correct answer is B (Conclusion does not follow)

It is plausible that the reason people who suffer from sleep apnoea encounter a personal battle is because of an inability to come to terms with this disease. However, since the passage does not provide an actual reason, you cannot reach this conclusion without reasonable doubt. 

The most common type of Critical Thinking Assessment is the Watson Glaser .

Difficult and time-pressured, the Watsong Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) takes a unique testing approach that breaks away from more traditional assessments. To see examples, check out our free Watson Glaser practice test .

Our expertly curated practice programme for the Watson Glaser will provide you with:

• A full-length diagnostic simulation
• Focused practice tests for the different test sections: inferences, assumptions, deductive reasoning, interpretations, and arguments.
• 3 additional full-length simulations
• Interactive tutorials

Or learn more about the Watson Glaser Test.

Critical Thinking Tests FAQs

What critical reasoning test am I most likely to take?

Very Likely the Watson-Glaser test

Another popular critical thinking assessment, Watson-Glaser is a well-established psychometric test produced by Pearson Assessments.

The Watson-Glaser test is used for two main purposes: job selection/talent management and academic evaluations. The Watson-Glaser test can be administered online or in-person.

For Watson Glaser practice questions,  click here !

What skills do critical reasoning test measure?

Critical Thinking can refer to various skills:

• Defining the problem
• Selecting the relevant information to solve the problem
• Recognising assumptions that are both written and implied in the text
• Creating hypotheses and selecting the most relevant and credible solutions
• Reaching valid conclusions and judging the validity of inferences

Pearson TalentLens condenses critical thinking into three major areas:

• R ecognise assumptions – the ability to notice and question assumptions, recognise information gaps or unfounded logic. Basically not taking anything for granted.
• E valuate arguments – the ability to analyse information objectively without letting your emotions affect your opinion.
• D raw conclusions – the ability to reach focused conclusions and inferences by considering diverse information, avoiding generalisations and disregarding information that is not available.

These are abilities that employers highly value in their employees, because they come into play in many stages of problem-solving and decision-making processes in the workplace, especially in business, management and law.

Why are critical thinking tests important to employers?

Critical thinking, or critical reasoning, is important to employers because they want to see that when dealing with an issue, you are able to make logical decisions without involving emotions.

Being able to look past emotions will help you to be open-minded, confident, and decisive—making your decisions more logical and sound.

What professions use critical thinking tests?

Below are some professions that use critical thinking tests and assessments during the hiring process as well as some positions that demand critical thinking and reasoning skills:

Preparation Packs for Critical Thinking & Critical Reasoning Assessmentsץ The Critical Thinking PrepPack™ provides you with the largest assembly of practice tests, study guides and tutorials. Our tests come complete with straightforward expert explanations and predictive score reports to let you know your skill level as well as your advancement. By using our materials you can significantly increase your potential within a few days and secure yourself better chances to get the job.

Don't Leave the Preparation to Your Competition

Continue Your Practice Now

Fill in the details of your test, and you will be redirected to the relevant page:

More on this topic

• Watson Glaser Practice Test
• Clifford Chance Watson Glaser
• Linklaters Watson Glaser
• Hogan Lovells Watson Glaser
• Watson Glaser & RANRA Practice Bundle

Since 1992, JobTestPrep has stood for true-to-original online test and assessment centre preparation. Our decades of experience make us a leading international provider of test training. Over one million customers have already used our products to prepare professionally for their recruitment tests.

• Arabic Site
• United States
• Terms & Conditions
• Refund Policy
• Affiliate Programme
• Higher Education
• Student Beans

• Table of Contents
• Random Entry
• Chronological
• Editorial Information
• About the SEP
• Editorial Board
• How to Cite the SEP
• Special Characters
• Advanced Tools
• Support the SEP
• PDFs for SEP Friends
• Make a Donation
• SEPIA for Libraries
• Back to Entry
• Entry Contents
• Entry Bibliography
• Academic Tools
• Friends PDF Preview
• Author and Citation Info
• Back to Top

Supplement to Critical Thinking

How can one assess, for purposes of instruction or research, the degree to which a person possesses the dispositions, skills and knowledge of a critical thinker?

In psychometrics, assessment instruments are judged according to their validity and reliability.

Roughly speaking, an instrument is valid if it measures accurately what it purports to measure, given standard conditions. More precisely, the degree of validity is “the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores for proposed uses of tests” (American Educational Research Association 2014: 11). In other words, a test is not valid or invalid in itself. Rather, validity is a property of an interpretation of a given score on a given test for a specified use. Determining the degree of validity of such an interpretation requires collection and integration of the relevant evidence, which may be based on test content, test takers’ response processes, a test’s internal structure, relationship of test scores to other variables, and consequences of the interpretation (American Educational Research Association 2014: 13–21). Criterion-related evidence consists of correlations between scores on the test and performance on another test of the same construct; its weight depends on how well supported is the assumption that the other test can be used as a criterion. Content-related evidence is evidence that the test covers the full range of abilities that it claims to test. Construct-related evidence is evidence that a correct answer reflects good performance of the kind being measured and an incorrect answer reflects poor performance.

An instrument is reliable if it consistently produces the same result, whether across different forms of the same test (parallel-forms reliability), across different items (internal consistency), across different administrations to the same person (test-retest reliability), or across ratings of the same answer by different people (inter-rater reliability). Internal consistency should be expected only if the instrument purports to measure a single undifferentiated construct, and thus should not be expected of a test that measures a suite of critical thinking dispositions or critical thinking abilities, assuming that some people are better in some of the respects measured than in others (for example, very willing to inquire but rather closed-minded). Otherwise, reliability is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of validity; a standard example of a reliable instrument that is not valid is a bathroom scale that consistently under-reports a person’s weight.

Assessing dispositions is difficult if one uses a multiple-choice format with known adverse consequences of a low score. It is pretty easy to tell what answer to the question “How open-minded are you?” will get the highest score and to give that answer, even if one knows that the answer is incorrect. If an item probes less directly for a critical thinking disposition, for example by asking how often the test taker pays close attention to views with which the test taker disagrees, the answer may differ from reality because of self-deception or simple lack of awareness of one’s personal thinking style, and its interpretation is problematic, even if factor analysis enables one to identify a distinct factor measured by a group of questions that includes this one (Ennis 1996). Nevertheless, Facione, Sánchez, and Facione (1994) used this approach to develop the California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory (CCTDI). They began with 225 statements expressive of a disposition towards or away from critical thinking (using the long list of dispositions in Facione 1990a), validated the statements with talk-aloud and conversational strategies in focus groups to determine whether people in the target population understood the items in the way intended, administered a pilot version of the test with 150 items, and eliminated items that failed to discriminate among test takers or were inversely correlated with overall results or added little refinement to overall scores (Facione 2000). They used item analysis and factor analysis to group the measured dispositions into seven broad constructs: open-mindedness, analyticity, cognitive maturity, truth-seeking, systematicity, inquisitiveness, and self-confidence (Facione, Sánchez, and Facione 1994). The resulting test consists of 75 agree-disagree statements and takes 20 minutes to administer. A repeated disturbing finding is that North American students taking the test tend to score low on the truth-seeking sub-scale (on which a low score results from agreeing to such statements as the following: “To get people to agree with me I would give any reason that worked”. “Everyone always argues from their own self-interest, including me”. “If there are four reasons in favor and one against, I’ll go with the four”.) Development of the CCTDI made it possible to test whether good critical thinking abilities and good critical thinking dispositions go together, in which case it might be enough to teach one without the other. Facione (2000) reports that administration of the CCTDI and the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) to almost 8,000 post-secondary students in the United States revealed a statistically significant but weak correlation between total scores on the two tests, and also between paired sub-scores from the two tests. The implication is that both abilities and dispositions need to be taught, that one cannot expect improvement in one to bring with it improvement in the other.

A more direct way of assessing critical thinking dispositions would be to see what people do when put in a situation where the dispositions would reveal themselves. Ennis (1996) reports promising initial work with guided open-ended opportunities to give evidence of dispositions, but no standardized test seems to have emerged from this work. There are however standardized aspect-specific tests of critical thinking dispositions. The Critical Problem Solving Scale (Berman et al. 2001: 518) takes as a measure of the disposition to suspend judgment the number of distinct good aspects attributed to an option judged to be the worst among those generated by the test taker. Stanovich, West and Toplak (2011: 800–810) list tests developed by cognitive psychologists of the following dispositions: resistance to miserly information processing, resistance to myside thinking, absence of irrelevant context effects in decision-making, actively open-minded thinking, valuing reason and truth, tendency to seek information, objective reasoning style, tendency to seek consistency, sense of self-efficacy, prudent discounting of the future, self-control skills, and emotional regulation.

It is easier to measure critical thinking skills or abilities than to measure dispositions. The following eight currently available standardized tests purport to measure them: the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (Watson & Glaser 1980a, 1980b, 1994), the Cornell Critical Thinking Tests Level X and Level Z (Ennis & Millman 1971; Ennis, Millman, & Tomko 1985, 2005), the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test (Ennis & Weir 1985), the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (Facione 1990b, 1992), the Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment (Halpern 2016), the Critical Thinking Assessment Test (Center for Assessment & Improvement of Learning 2017), the Collegiate Learning Assessment (Council for Aid to Education 2017), the HEIghten Critical Thinking Assessment (https://territorium.com/heighten/), and a suite of critical thinking assessments for different groups and purposes offered by Insight Assessment (https://www.insightassessment.com/products). The Critical Thinking Assessment Test (CAT) is unique among them in being designed for use by college faculty to help them improve their development of students’ critical thinking skills (Haynes et al. 2015; Haynes & Stein 2021). Also, for some years the United Kingdom body OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations) awarded AS and A Level certificates in critical thinking on the basis of an examination (OCR 2011). Many of these standardized tests have received scholarly evaluations at the hands of, among others, Ennis (1958), McPeck (1981), Norris and Ennis (1989), Fisher and Scriven (1997), Possin (2008, 2013a, 2013b, 2013c, 2014, 2020) and Hatcher and Possin (2021). Their evaluations provide a useful set of criteria that such tests ideally should meet, as does the description by Ennis (1984) of problems in testing for competence in critical thinking: the soundness of multiple-choice items, the clarity and soundness of instructions to test takers, the information and mental processing used in selecting an answer to a multiple-choice item, the role of background beliefs and ideological commitments in selecting an answer to a multiple-choice item, the tenability of a test’s underlying conception of critical thinking and its component abilities, the set of abilities that the test manual claims are covered by the test, the extent to which the test actually covers these abilities, the appropriateness of the weighting given to various abilities in the scoring system, the accuracy and intellectual honesty of the test manual, the interest of the test to the target population of test takers, the scope for guessing, the scope for choosing a keyed answer by being test-wise, precautions against cheating in the administration of the test, clarity and soundness of materials for training essay graders, inter-rater reliability in grading essays, and clarity and soundness of advance guidance to test takers on what is required in an essay. Rear (2019) has challenged the use of standardized tests of critical thinking as a way to measure educational outcomes, on the grounds that  they (1) fail to take into account disputes about conceptions of critical thinking, (2) are not completely valid or reliable, and (3) fail to evaluate skills used in real academic tasks. He proposes instead assessments based on discipline-specific content.

There are also aspect-specific standardized tests of critical thinking abilities. Stanovich, West and Toplak (2011: 800–810) list tests of probabilistic reasoning, insights into qualitative decision theory, knowledge of scientific reasoning, knowledge of rules of logical consistency and validity, and economic thinking. They also list instruments that probe for irrational thinking, such as superstitious thinking, belief in the superiority of intuition, over-reliance on folk wisdom and folk psychology, belief in “special” expertise, financial misconceptions, overestimation of one’s introspective powers, dysfunctional beliefs, and a notion of self that encourages egocentric processing. They regard these tests along with the previously mentioned tests of critical thinking dispositions as the building blocks for a comprehensive test of rationality, whose development (they write) may be logistically difficult and would require millions of dollars.

A superb example of assessment of an aspect of critical thinking ability is the Test on Appraising Observations (Norris & King 1983, 1985, 1990a, 1990b), which was designed for classroom administration to senior high school students. The test focuses entirely on the ability to appraise observation statements and in particular on the ability to determine in a specified context which of two statements there is more reason to believe. According to the test manual (Norris & King 1985, 1990b), a person’s score on the multiple-choice version of the test, which is the number of items that are answered correctly, can justifiably be given either a criterion-referenced or a norm-referenced interpretation.

On a criterion-referenced interpretation, those who do well on the test have a firm grasp of the principles for appraising observation statements, and those who do poorly have a weak grasp of them. This interpretation can be justified by the content of the test and the way it was developed, which incorporated a method of controlling for background beliefs articulated and defended by Norris (1985). Norris and King synthesized from judicial practice, psychological research and common-sense psychology 31 principles for appraising observation statements, in the form of empirical generalizations about tendencies, such as the principle that observation statements tend to be more believable than inferences based on them (Norris & King 1984). They constructed items in which exactly one of the 31 principles determined which of two statements was more believable. Using a carefully constructed protocol, they interviewed about 100 students who responded to these items in order to determine the thinking that led them to choose the answers they did (Norris & King 1984). In several iterations of the test, they adjusted items so that selection of the correct answer generally reflected good thinking and selection of an incorrect answer reflected poor thinking. Thus they have good evidence that good performance on the test is due to good thinking about observation statements and that poor performance is due to poor thinking about observation statements. Collectively, the 50 items on the final version of the test require application of 29 of the 31 principles for appraising observation statements, with 13 principles tested by one item, 12 by two items, three by three items, and one by four items. Thus there is comprehensive coverage of the principles for appraising observation statements. Fisher and Scriven (1997: 135–136) judge the items to be well worked and sound, with one exception. The test is clearly written at a grade 6 reading level, meaning that poor performance cannot be attributed to difficulties in reading comprehension by the intended adolescent test takers. The stories that frame the items are realistic, and are engaging enough to stimulate test takers’ interest. Thus the most plausible explanation of a given score on the test is that it reflects roughly the degree to which the test taker can apply principles for appraising observations in real situations. In other words, there is good justification of the proposed interpretation that those who do well on the test have a firm grasp of the principles for appraising observation statements and those who do poorly have a weak grasp of them.

To get norms for performance on the test, Norris and King arranged for seven groups of high school students in different types of communities and with different levels of academic ability to take the test. The test manual includes percentiles, means, and standard deviations for each of these seven groups. These norms allow teachers to compare the performance of their class on the test to that of a similar group of students.

Copyright © 2022 by David Hitchcock < hitchckd @ mcmaster . ca >

• Accessibility

Support SEP

Mirror sites.

View this site from another server:

• Info about mirror sites

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is copyright © 2023 by The Metaphysics Research Lab , Department of Philosophy, Stanford University

Library of Congress Catalog Data: ISSN 1095-5054

Critical Thinking Assessment: 4 Ways to Test Applicants

In the current age of information overload, critical thinking (CT) is a vital skill to sift fact from fiction. Fake news, scams, and disinformation can have a negative impact on individuals as well as businesses. Ultimately, those with finer CT skills can help to lead their team with logical thinking, evidence-based motivation, and smarter decisions.

Today, most roles require critical thinking skills. And understanding how to test and evaluate critical thinking skills can not only help to differentiate candidates but may even predict job performance .

This article will cover:

What is critical thinking?

• Critical thinking vs problem-solving
• 5 critical thinking sub-skills
• The importance of assessing critical thinking skills
• 4 ways to leverage critical thinking assessments

Critical thinking is the process of analyzing and evaluating information in a logical way. And though a valuable skill since as far back as the early philosophers’ era, it is just as vital today. For candidates to succeed in the digital economy , they need modern thinking skills that help them think critically.

Whether we realize it or not, we process tons of data and information on a daily basis. Everything from social media to online news, data from apps like Strava – and that’s on top of all the key metrics in relation to our professional role.

Without a shadow of a doubt, correctly interpreting information — and recognizing disinformation — is an essential skill in today’s workplace and everyday life. And that’s also why teaching critical thinking skills in education is so important to prepare the next generation for the challenges they will face in the modern workplace.

Critical thinking isn’t about being constantly negative or critical of everything. It’s about objectivity and having an open, inquisitive mind. To think critically is to analyze issues based on hard evidence (as opposed to personal opinions, biases, etc.) in order to build a thorough understanding of what’s really going on. And from this place of thorough understanding, you can make better decisions and solve problems more effectively. Bernard Marr | Source

Today, candidates with CT skills think and reason independently, question data, and use their findings to contribute actively to their team rather than passively taking in or accepting information as fact.

Why are critical thinking skills important?

In the workplace, those with strong CT skills no longer rely on their gut or instinct for their decisions. They’re able to problem-solve more effectively by analyzing situations systematically.

With these skills, they think objectively about information and other points of view and look for evidence to support their findings rather than simply accepting opinions or conclusions as facts.

When employees can turn critical thinking into a habit, it ultimately reduces personal bias and helps them be more open to their teammates’ suggestions — improving how teams collaborate and collectively solve problems.

Critical thinking vs. Problem solving – what’s the difference?

Let’s explore the difference between these two similar concepts in more detail.

Critical thinking is about processing and analyzing information to reach an objective, evidence-based conclusion. Let’s take a look at an example of critical thinking in action:

• A member of the team suggests using a new app they’ve heard about to automate and speed up candidate screening . Some like the idea, but others in the team share reasons why they don’t support the idea. So you visit the software website and look at the key features and benefits yourself, then you might look for reviews about it and ask your HR counterparts what they think of it. The reviews look promising, and a few of your fellow practitioners say it’s worked well for them. Next, you look into the costs compared to the solution your team is already using and calculate that the return on investment (ROI) is good. You arrive at the conclusion that it’d be worth testing the platform with the free trial version and recommend this to your team.

On the other hand, problem solving can involve many of the same skills as critical thinking, such as observing and evaluating. Still, it focuses on identifying business obstacles and coming up with solutions. So, let’s return to the example of the candidate screening software and see how it might work differently in the context of problem-solving :

• For weeks, the talent acquisition team has complained about how long it takes to screen candidates manually. One of the team members decides to look for a solution to their problem. They assess the team’s current processes and resources and how to best solve the issues. In their research, they discover the new candidate screening platform and test out its functionality for a few days. They feel it would benefit the team and suggest it at the next meeting. Great problem solving, HR leader!

What are the 5 sub-skills that make up critical thinking?

Now that we’ve established what CT is, let’s break it down into the 5 core sub-skills that make up a critical thinking mindset .

• Observation : Being observant of your environment is the first step to thinking critically. Observant employees can even identify a potential problem before it becomes a problem.
• Analysis : Once you’ve observed the issue or problem, you can begin to analyze its parts. It’s about asking questions, researching, and evaluating the findings objectively. This is an essential skill, especially for someone in a management role.
• Inference : Also known as construct validity, is about drawing a conclusion from limited information. To do this effectively may require in-depth knowledge of a field. Candidates with this skill can contribute a lot of value to a startup, for instance, where initially, there may be little data available for information processing.
• Communication : This pertains to expressing ideas and your reasoning clearly and persuasively, as well as actively listening to colleagues’ suggestions or viewpoints. When all members of a team or department can communicate and consider different perspectives, it helps tasks (and, well, everything) move along swiftly and smoothly.
• Problem solving : Once you begin implementing a chosen solution, you may still encounter teething problems. At that point, problem solving skills will help you decide on the best solution and how to overcome the obstacles to bring you closer to your goal.

What is a critical thinking assessment test?

Though there are a few different ways to assess critical thinking, such as the Collegiate Learning Assessment, one of the most well-known tests is the Watson Glaser™ Critical Thinking Appraisal .

Critical thinking tests, or critical reasoning tests, are psychometric tests used in recruitment at all levels, graduate, professional and managerial, but predominantly in the legal sector. However, it is not uncommon to find companies in other sectors using critical thinking tests as part of their selection process. This is an intense test, focusing primarily on your analytical, or critical thinking, skills. Source

These tests are usually timed and typically include multiple choice items, short answers or short scenario-based questions to assess students or prospective candidates. They test candidates’ ability to interpret data without bias, find logical links between information, and separate facts from false data .

But how do these tests measure critical thinking?

In addition to educational and psychological testing, many employers today use critical thinking tests to assess a person’s ability to question information — to ask What , Why , and How of the data. A standard critical thinking test breaks down this aptitude by examining the following 5 components:

• assumption – analyzing a scenario to determine if there are any assumptions made
• deduction – the ability to choose which deductions are logical
• evaluating evidence – in support of and against something
• inference – conclusions, drawn from observed facts
• interpretation – interpreting the accuracy of a stated conclusion (based on a scenario)

Why is it important to assess critical thinking skills during the recruitment process?

Critical thinking skills may be considered a soft skill , but it’s become a prerequisite in certain industries, like software, and for many roles. Marketing managers, project managers, accountants, and healthcare professionals, for example, all require a degree of CT skills to perform their roles.

The kinds of businesses that require critical thinking include technology , engineering , healthcare , the legal sector , scientific research, and education . These industries are typically very technical and rely on data . People working in these fields research and use data to draw logical conclusions that help them work smarter and more efficiently.

In the hiring process, test takers with good critical thinking skills stand out . Why? Because they are able to demonstrate their ability to collaborate, problem-solve, and manage pressure in a rational, logical manner. As a result, they’re more likely to make the right business decisions that boost efficiency and, ultimately, a business’s bottom line.

Examples of jobs that rely on critical thinking skills

Critical thinking is not rocket science, but it is an important skill when making decisions — especially when the correct answer is not obvious. Here are a few examples of job roles that rely on critical thinking dispositions:

• computer programmers or developers : may use critical thinking and other advanced skills in a variety of ways, from debugging code to analyzing the problem, finding potential causes, and coming up with suitable solutions. They also use CT when there is no clear roadmap to rely on, such as when building a new app or feature.
• criminologists : must have critical thinking abilities to observe criminal behavior objectively and to analyze the problem in such a way that they can be confident in the conclusions they present to the authorities.
• medical professionals : need to diagnose their patients’ condition through observation, communication, analysis and solving complex problems to decide on the best treatment.
• air traffic controllers: need a super clear, calm head to deal with their high-stress job. They observe traffic, communicate with pilots, and constantly problem-solve to avoid airplane collisions.
• legal professionals : use logic and reasoning to analyze various cases – even before deciding whether they’ll take on a case – and then use their excellent communication skills to sway people over to their reasoning in a trial setting.
• project managers : have to deal with a lot of moving parts at the same time. To successfully keep projects on time and budget, they continually observe and analyze the progress of project components, communicate continually with the team and external stakeholders and work to solve any problems that crop up.

What are the risks of not testing for critical thinking?

By not evaluating critical thinking beforehand, you may end up hiring candidates with poor CT skills. Especially when hiring business leaders and for key positions, this has the potential to wreak havoc on a business. Their inaccurate assumptions are more likely to lead to bad decisions , which could cost the company money .

Weak critical thinking can result in a number of issues for your organization and justifies the expense or added effort of asking your candidate to complete critical thinking tests in the hiring process. For example, poor CT skills may result in:

• making mistakes
• not being able to take action when needed
• working off false assumptions
• unnecessary strain on work relationships

4 ways to assess critical thinking skills in candidates

Now that we’ve seen how important it is for most candidates today to have strong critical thinking skills, let’s take a look at some of the assessment instruments the talent acquisition team can use.

#1 – A homework assignment

A homework assignment is a task that assesses whether test takers have the right skills for a role. If critical thinking is essential for a particular job, you could provide candidates with a homework assignment that specifically tests their ability to:

• accurately interpret relevant evidence
• reach logical conclusions
• judge information skeptically
• communicate their own viewpoint and others’ backed by facts

Tip : use Toggl Hire’s skills screening tests to easily filter out the good candidates first and speed up your hiring process.

#2 – Behavioral and situational interview questions

Ask the candidate to provide examples of situations when they used CT for solving problems or making a decision. This can provide insight into the candidate’s ability to analyze information and make informed decisions. For example:

Critical thinking example questions:

• Tell me about a time when you had to make a really difficult decision at work.
• What would you do in a situation where your manager made a mistake in a presentation or report?
• How would you respond if a colleague shared a new idea or solution with you?
• How do you evaluate the potential outcomes of different actions or decisions?
• Can you describe a situation where you had to think on your feet and come up with a creative solution to a problem?
• How do you ensure that your decision-making is based on relevant and accurate information?

#3 – Discuss the candidate’s critical thinking skills with their references

Additionally, the hiring manager can ask the candidate’s references about how the candidate demonstrated CT skills in the past.

• Can you recall a time when (the candidate) had to convince you to choose an alternative solution to a problem?
• Tell me about a time when (the candidate) had to solve a team disagreement regarding a project.

#4 – Critical thinking tests

Ask the candidate to complete a critical thinking test and score against critical thinking rubrics. You can then share feedback on their test scores with them and explore their willingness to improve their score, if necessary. Or compare their score to other applicants, and prioritize those with higher scores if the role truly requires a critical thinker.

Create your next critical thinking assessment with Toggl Hire

Assessing critical thinking skills is becoming a key component in the hiring process, especially for roles that require a particularly advanced skillset. Critical thinking is a sign of future performance. Candidates that clearly demonstrate these skills have a lot to offer companies, from better decision-making to more productive relationships and cost savings.

If your team needs help automating the screening process, and creating custom skills tests based on specific roles, try Toggl Hire’s skills test questions engine or the Custom Test Builder to create the exact questions you want from scratch.

Juste loves investigating through writing. A copywriter by trade, she spent the last ten years in startups, telling stories and building marketing teams. She works at Toggl Hire and writes about how businesses can recruit really great people.

Join 30,000+ subscribers getting the best tips on productivity, work management, hiring and more!

We promise we won't spam you and you can unsubscribe anytime.

You might also like...

Related to Talent Assessments

6 Meta Skills Candidates Need in 2024 to Work Well with AI

The 5 Types of Communication Styles in the Workplace & How to Identify Them

How to Hire a Financial Controller for Your Business

Take a peek at our most popular categories:

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Working with sources
• What Is Critical Thinking? | Definition & Examples

What Is Critical Thinking? | Definition & Examples

Published on May 30, 2022 by Eoghan Ryan . Revised on May 31, 2023.

Critical thinking is the ability to effectively analyze information and form a judgment .

To think critically, you must be aware of your own biases and assumptions when encountering information, and apply consistent standards when evaluating sources .

Critical thinking skills help you to:

• Identify credible sources
• Evaluate and respond to arguments
• Assess alternative viewpoints
• Test hypotheses against relevant criteria

Table of contents

Why is critical thinking important, critical thinking examples, how to think critically, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about critical thinking.

Critical thinking is important for making judgments about sources of information and forming your own arguments. It emphasizes a rational, objective, and self-aware approach that can help you to identify credible sources and strengthen your conclusions.

Critical thinking is important in all disciplines and throughout all stages of the research process . The types of evidence used in the sciences and in the humanities may differ, but critical thinking skills are relevant to both.

In academic writing , critical thinking can help you to determine whether a source:

• Is free from research bias
• Provides evidence to support its research findings
• Considers alternative viewpoints

Outside of academia, critical thinking goes hand in hand with information literacy to help you form opinions rationally and engage independently and critically with popular media.

Scribbr Citation Checker New

The AI-powered Citation Checker helps you avoid common mistakes such as:

• Missing commas and periods
• Incorrect usage of “et al.”
• Ampersands (&) in narrative citations
• Missing reference entries

Critical thinking can help you to identify reliable sources of information that you can cite in your research paper . It can also guide your own research methods and inform your own arguments.

Outside of academia, critical thinking can help you to be aware of both your own and others’ biases and assumptions.

Academic examples

However, when you compare the findings of the study with other current research, you determine that the results seem improbable. You analyze the paper again, consulting the sources it cites.

You notice that the research was funded by the pharmaceutical company that created the treatment. Because of this, you view its results skeptically and determine that more independent research is necessary to confirm or refute them. Example: Poor critical thinking in an academic context You’re researching a paper on the impact wireless technology has had on developing countries that previously did not have large-scale communications infrastructure. You read an article that seems to confirm your hypothesis: the impact is mainly positive. Rather than evaluating the research methodology, you accept the findings uncritically.

Nonacademic examples

However, you decide to compare this review article with consumer reviews on a different site. You find that these reviews are not as positive. Some customers have had problems installing the alarm, and some have noted that it activates for no apparent reason.

You revisit the original review article. You notice that the words “sponsored content” appear in small print under the article title. Based on this, you conclude that the review is advertising and is therefore not an unbiased source. Example: Poor critical thinking in a nonacademic context You support a candidate in an upcoming election. You visit an online news site affiliated with their political party and read an article that criticizes their opponent. The article claims that the opponent is inexperienced in politics. You accept this without evidence, because it fits your preconceptions about the opponent.

There is no single way to think critically. How you engage with information will depend on the type of source you’re using and the information you need.

However, you can engage with sources in a systematic and critical way by asking certain questions when you encounter information. Like the CRAAP test , these questions focus on the currency , relevance , authority , accuracy , and purpose of a source of information.

When encountering information, ask:

• Who is the author? Are they an expert in their field?
• What do they say? Is their argument clear? Can you summarize it?
• When did they say this? Is the source current?
• Where is the information published? Is it an academic article? Is it peer-reviewed ?
• Why did the author publish it? What is their motivation?
• How do they make their argument? Is it backed up by evidence? Does it rely on opinion, speculation, or appeals to emotion ? Do they address alternative arguments?

Critical thinking also involves being aware of your own biases, not only those of others. When you make an argument or draw your own conclusions, you can ask similar questions about your own writing:

• Am I only considering evidence that supports my preconceptions?
• Is my argument expressed clearly and backed up with credible sources?
• Would I be convinced by this argument coming from someone else?

If you want to know more about ChatGPT, AI tools , citation , and plagiarism , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• ChatGPT vs human editor
• ChatGPT citations
• Is ChatGPT trustworthy?
• Using ChatGPT for your studies
• What is ChatGPT?
• Chicago style
• Paraphrasing

 Plagiarism

• Types of plagiarism
• Self-plagiarism
• Avoiding plagiarism
• Academic integrity
• Consequences of plagiarism
• Common knowledge

The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing - try for free!

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.

Try for free

Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.

Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.

Critical thinking skills include the ability to:

You can assess information and arguments critically by asking certain questions about the source. You can use the CRAAP test , focusing on the currency , relevance , authority , accuracy , and purpose of a source of information.

Ask questions such as:

• Who is the author? Are they an expert?
• How do they make their argument? Is it backed up by evidence?

A credible source should pass the CRAAP test  and follow these guidelines:

• The information should be up to date and current.
• The author and publication should be a trusted authority on the subject you are researching.
• The sources the author cited should be easy to find, clear, and unbiased.
• For a web source, the URL and layout should signify that it is trustworthy.

Information literacy refers to a broad range of skills, including the ability to find, evaluate, and use sources of information effectively.

Being information literate means that you:

• Know how to find credible sources
• Use relevant sources to inform your research
• Understand what constitutes plagiarism
• Know how to cite your sources correctly

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search, interpret, and recall information in a way that aligns with our pre-existing values, opinions, or beliefs. It refers to the ability to recollect information best when it amplifies what we already believe. Relatedly, we tend to forget information that contradicts our opinions.

Although selective recall is a component of confirmation bias, it should not be confused with recall bias.

On the other hand, recall bias refers to the differences in the ability between study participants to recall past events when self-reporting is used. This difference in accuracy or completeness of recollection is not related to beliefs or opinions. Rather, recall bias relates to other factors, such as the length of the recall period, age, and the characteristics of the disease under investigation.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Ryan, E. (2023, May 31). What Is Critical Thinking? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/working-with-sources/critical-thinking/

Is this article helpful?

Eoghan Ryan

Other students also liked, student guide: information literacy | meaning & examples, what are credible sources & how to spot them | examples, applying the craap test & evaluating sources, unlimited academic ai-proofreading.

✔ Document error-free in 5minutes ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

• Practice Tests
• Predictive Index
• Firefighter
• Hogan Assessments
• Leadership Assessment
• GardaWorld Pre Board
• Criticall Dispatcher
• Ramsay Technician Course
• Watson-Glaser
• Cubiks Course
• NEO Personality Inventory
• Texas Success Initiative
• TSA Prep Booster™ Course
• TSA Practice Test
• TSA Written Skills Assessment
• TSA CBT X-Ray Object Recognition Test
• SHL Assessment Prep Course
• Practice Test & Answers
• SHL Practice Tests
• SHL Test Answers
• SHL Inductive Reasoning Test
• SHL Numerical Reasoning Test
• SHL Verbal Reasoning Test
• SHL Verify G+ Test
• SHL Mechanical Comprehension Test
• SHL Situational Judgment Test
• SHL OPQ Personality Test
• Predictive Index Test Behavioral & Cognitive Assessment Course
• Predictive Index Cognitive Assessment Course
• Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment Course
• Predictive Index Practice Test
• Predictive Index Results
• Caliper Course
• Caliper Test Prep With Real Practice Test
• USPS Postal Exam
• Postal Exam 474
• Postal Exam 475
• Postal Exam 476
• Postal Exam 477
• USPS Postal Exam Prep
• Pass the 2024 Postal Exam With Practice Tests
• Virtual Entry Assessment (VEA)
• General Police Prep Course
• Police Situational Judgement Test
• Police Psychological Exam Course
• EB Jacobs Law Enforcement Aptitude Battery
• Massachusetts State Police Exam
• Pennsylvania Police Exam
• Philadelphia Police Exam
• Nassau County Police Exam Course
• Suffolk County Police Exam
• CJBAT Study Guide
• Correctional Officer Exam
• DELPOE Police Exam
• Texas LEVEL Test With Expert Guides
• MTA Police Exam
• New York State Police Exam Prep Course
• PELLETB Course
• School Safety Agent Course
• Police Officer NYPD Exam
• Police Fitness Prep Course
• FBI Test Phase 1 (Special Agent Exam): Guide with Practice Test [2024]
• Police Test Preparation Suite
• Pass a Polygraph Test (Lie Detector): Expert Tips & Questions – 2024
• Firefighter Aptitude and Character Test
• Firefighter Psych Test
• FCTC Firefighter Prep Course
• NFSI Firefighter Prep Course
• FireTeam Prep Course
• FDNY Firefighter Prep Course
• Firefighter Test
• Master Course
• Hogan Assessments Master Course
• Personality Courses
• Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI)
• Hogan Development Survey (HDS)
• Hogan Motives, Values & Preferences Inventory (MVPI)
• Busines Reasoning Course
• Hogan Business Reasoning Inventory (HBRI)
• Leadership Assessment Test
• GardaWorld Pre Board Primer
• Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test II (BMCT-II) Success Prep Course
• Beat the 2024 BMCT With Industry Expert Guides & Realistic Practice Tests
• 911 Dispatcher Course
• Criticall Dispatcher Course
• Criticall Dispatcher Test
• CCAT Course
• Beat the 2024 Criteria Cognitive Aptitude Test & Guide & Free CCAT Practice Test
• Criteria Pre-employment Testing: Personality, Aptitude & Skill Tests
• CRITERIA COGNITIVE APTITUDE TEST
• Korn Ferry Course
• Ace the 2024 Korn Ferry Assessment With Practice Test & Expert Guides
• Ramsay Electrical Course
• Ramsay Maintenance Course
• Ramsay Mechanical Course
• Ramsay Multicraft Course
• Ramsay Electrical Practice Test
• Ramsay Maintenance Practice Test
• Ramsay Mechanical Practice Test
• Ramsay Multicraft Practice Test
• Ramsay Test Prep
• SIFT Practice Test & Study Guide
• Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Course
• Watson Glaser Test 2024: Free Practice Tests, Format, and 5 Sections Overview
• Take on the Watson Glaser and Secure your Future Career
• Beat the Watson Glaser and Upgrade Your Career
• Cubiks Test: Guide on all Test Types and Free Cubiks Practice Test
• Cubiks PAPI Test: Focus Areas and Test Format (2024)
• Cubiks Assessment Test to Start Working at KPMG
• Texas Success Initiative Course
• TSI Practice Test 2024: Math, Reading & Writing
• TSI Reading Practice Test: 15 Q&A with Explanations
• Pass our Free TSI Math Practice Test (2024 Update)
• Take our Free TSI Writing Practice Test (2024)
• How it Works

Critical Thinking Test: Sample Questions with Explanations (2024)

Employers value and seek candidates who demonstrate advanced critical thinking skills. They often administer critical thinking tests as part of their hiring process. Critical thinking tests can be very difficult for those who don’t prepare. A great way to start practicing is by taking our critical thinking free practice test.

What Does The Critical Thinking Test Include?

The Critical Thinking Test assesses your capacity to think critically and form logical conclusions when given written information. Critical thinking tests are generally used in job recruitment processes, in the legal sector. These tests measure the analytical critical thinking abilities of a candidate.

Why Is Critical Thinking Useful?

Critical thinking is put into action in various stages of decision-making and problem-solving tasks:

• Identify the problem
• Choose suitable information to find the solution
• Identify the assumptions that are implied and written in the text
• Form hypotheses and choose the most suitable and credible answers
• Form well-founded conclusions and determine the soundness of inferences

What is Watson Glaser Test and what Critical Thinking Skills it Measures?

The most common type of critical thinking test is the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (W-GCTA). Typically used by legal and financial organizations, as well as management businesses, a Watson Glaser test is created to assess candidates’ critical thinking skills.

The test consists of 10 questions to be answered in 10 minutes approx (although there is no timer on the test itself). Our test is slightly harder than the real thing, to make it sufficiently challenging practice.

You need to get 70% correct to pass the test. Don’t forget to first check out the test techniques section further down this page beforehand.

Questions          25

Pass percentage          70%.

The test is broken down into five central areas:

• Assumptions
• Interpretation

Critical Thinking Course

• 1 BONUS Interview Prep Video Guide Buy this Course: Get full access to all lessons, practice tests and guides.

The Five Critical Thinking Skills Explained

1. recognition of assumption.

You’ll be presented with a statement. The statement is then followed by several proposed assumptions. When answering, you must work out if an assumption was made or if an assumption was not made in the statement. An assumption is a proclamation that an individual takes for granted. This section of the tests measures your ability to withhold from forming assumptions about things that are not necessarily correct.

• 1: Assumption Made
• 2: Assumption Not Made

Although the passage does state that Charlie’s fundraising team is doing its best so that the charity event can meet its goal, nowhere did it state that their team is leading the event.

2. Evaluation of Arguments

You will be presented with an argument. You will then be asked to decide whether the argument is strong or weak. An argument is considered strong if it directly connects to the statement provided, and is believed to be significant.

No, participation awards should not be given in every competition because studies have shown that this would cause the participants to put in less effort because they will get a prize no matter what the outcome is.

• 1: Strong Argument
• 2: Weak Argument

This is a strong argument as it provides evidence as to why participation awards should not be given in every competition

3. Deductions

In deduction questions, you will need to form conclusions based solely on the information provided in the question and not based on your knowledge. You will be given a small passage of information and you will need to evaluate a list of deductions made based on that passage. If the conclusion cannot be formed for the information provided, then the conclusion does not follow. The answer must be entirely founded on the statements made and not on conclusions drawn from your knowledge.

In a surprise party for Donna, Edna arrived after Felix and Gary did. Kelly arrived before Felix and Gary did.

• 1: Conclusion Follows
• 2: Conclusion Does not Follow

For questions like this, jot down the clues to help you out. Use initials as a quick reference.

K | F&G | E

Looking at the simple diagram, “K”, which stands for “Kelly,” arrived before Edna “E” did. The answer is A.

4. Interpretation

In these questions, you are given a passage of information followed by a list of possible conclusions. You will need to interpret the information in the paragraph and determine whether or not each conclusion follows, based solely on the information given.

A number of students were given the following advice:

“The use of powerful words is a technique, which makes you a better writer. Your choice of words is very important in molding the way people interaction with the article. You should use powerful words to spice up your article. Power words should be used liberally to enhance the flavor of what you write! ”

In the fourth sentence, it is stated, “Power words should be used liberally to enhance the flavor of what you write!”

Thus, if you were to write an essay, using powerful words can give more flavor to it.

5. Inferences

An inference is a conclusion made from observed or supposed facts and details. It is information that is not apparent in the information provided but rather is extracted from it. In this section, you will be provided with a passage of information about a specific scene or event. A list of possible inferences will then be given, and you will need to decide if they are ‘true’, ‘false’, ‘possibly true’, ‘possibly false’, or whether it is not possible to say based on the information provided.

With the advancement of technology, the need for more infrastructure has never been higher. According to the plan of the current U.S. Administration, it aims to put a $1 trillion investment on improving infrastructure, a portion of which will include priority projects and technologies that can strengthen its economic competitiveness such as transportation, 5G wireless communication technology, rural broadband technologies, advanced manufacturing technologies, and even artificial intelligence.

It stated that it expects to work with Congress to develop a comprehensive infrastructure package, which is expected to have a budget of $200 billion for certain priorities.

• 2: Probably True
• 3: Not Enough Information
• 4: Probably False

Although it was mentioned in the passage that the U.S. government is to allocate $200 billion on certain priorities, it did not specify if these certain priorities were for ‘transportation, 5G wireless communication technology, rural broadband technologies, advanced manufacturing technologies, and artificial intelligence’ or if the aforementioned priorities will have a different allocation.

What we can be sure of, however, is that at least a portion of the $1 trillion infrastructure budget will be used on the mentioned priorities regardless, meaning that there is a chance that $200 billion will be used on those aforementioned areas.

Improve Your Score with Prepterminal’s Critical Thinking Course

The Critical Thinking test is difficult, but not impossible to overcome with practice. At PrepTerminal our psychometric test experts have developed a critical thinking preparatory test to provide you with the material you need to practice for your critical thinking test. Prepare with us to increase your chance of successfully overcoming this hurdle in the recruitment process.

Prepterminal’s preparatory critical thinking course features a structured study course along with critical thinking practice tests to help you improve your exam score. Our course includes video and text-based information presented in a clear and easy-to-understand manner so you can follow along at your own pace with ease.

Created by: Matt

Psychometric tutor, prepterminal test expert, 414 students, 4.7 , 73 reviews.

• Personality
• By Publisher
• Prep Access
• Articles & News
• For Employers

Critical Thinking Test

A Critical Thinking test, also known as a critical reasoning test, determines your ability to reason through an argument logically and make an objective decision. You may be required to assess a situation, recognize assumptions being made, create hypotheses, and evaluate arguments. What questions can I expect? Questions are very likely to be based on the Watson and Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal model, which contains five sections specially designed to find out how good an individual is at reasoning analytically and logically. The five sections are: Arguments: In the argument section you are tested on your ability to distinguish between arguments that are strong and arguments that are weak. For an argument to be strong, it must be both important and directly related to the question. An argument is weak if it is not directly related to the question, of minor importance, or it confuses correlation with causation (which is incorrectly assuming that just because two things are related, they are the cause of each other). Assumptions: An assumption is something we take for granted. People make many assumptions which may not necessarily be correct; being able to identify these is a key aspect of critical reasoning. An assumption question will include a statement and a number of assumptions. You are required to identify whether an assumption has been made or not. Deductions: In deduction questions you have to draw conclusions based on only the information given in the question and not your own knowledge. You will be provided with a small passage of information and you will need to evaluate a conclusion made based on that passage. If the conclusion cannot be drawn from the information given, then the conclusion does not follow. Interpretation: In these questions you are given a passage of information followed by a proposed conclusion. You are to regard the information you are given as true and decide whether the proposed conclusion logically and beyond doubt follows. Inferences: Inference is a conclusion drawn from supposed or observed facts. It is information that does not appear directly in the given information, but is drawn from it. If, for instance, we go to a public restroom and find the door locked, we will assume/make the inference that it is occupied. Where are Critical Thinking tests used? These tests are used in graduate, professional, and managerial recruitment. They are very common in the legal and banking sector.

Practice Critical Thinking Test

Try a free Critical Thinking Test. This test is a short practice test, the test contains 10 test questions and has a time limit of 6 minutes.

Would you like to improve your test score? Practice smart with a Test Prep Account.

Practice on 150 Critical Thinking questions and a total of 950 verbal aptitude questions with detailed description and score statistics.

The many features of a Test Prep Account:

• Preparation software developed under a didactic and methodical perspective
• High-quality practice test questions
• Clearly explained solutions
• Accessible on all devices
• Detailed score data and progression charts
• Reference scores to compare your performance against others
• Training Assistant
• Practice mode (feedback after every question and no time limit)

How to assess critical thinking skills in candidates

It’s not always easy to assess critical thinking skills, but there is a solution – a reliable critical thinking skills test.  It’s the ideal way to get accurate data on a candidate’s critical thinking skills as a whole, as well as a wide range of individual skill sets in your candidates. 

TestGorilla’s comprehensive critical thinking skills test can help you determine whether your candidates can evaluate complex challenges and solve problems using a critical thinking approach. Discover more about how to assess critical thinking skills below.

Table of contents

What does critical thinking mean, why candidates’ critical thinking abilities should align with your industry, assessing critical thinking skills with skills tests, what are the benefits of using a critical thinking skills assessment, use testgorilla’s critical thinking tests to hire with confidence.

Top critical thinking skills indicate that a candidate or employee will be able to gather all the information needed for a task or project, objectively assess data, and conclude how to complete tasks based on what they have learned from their research.

Although more information may appear to be useful when solving tasks, what’s essential is having the right facts and data; more can sometimes equal less in terms of deductive reasoning because some facts may be irrelevant in certain situations. As a result, critical thinking also entails filtering out irrelevant data.

Critical thinking skills are made up of a group of sub-skills that help candidates solve problems and complete tasks, such as research and analytical skills, assessing and interpreting information with critical judgment skills, sharing findings with excellent communication skills, and problem-solving skills in the workplace .

Using research and analytical skills to gather and conceptualize data

Candidates with exceptional critical thinking skills should first be able to gather the necessary information for the task at hand. This might include consulting various sources of information and conducting research on the project.

Assessing and evaluating information with critical judgment skills

To approach the task, candidates and employees will need to evaluate the information they’ve gathered using the appropriate approaches. 

Before taking any action, they should objectively evaluate the validity of the research they have gathered to ensure the data is reliable and accurate using objective, critical judgment skills.

For instance, before writing a blog post or article, content writers should evaluate the credibility of their sources, which helps them overcome the challenge of producing a factually accurate piece.

Using data inference to make complex decisions and make conclusions

Candidates and employees must also be able to recognize patterns, trends, or correlations in data to resolve complex problems and arrive at a conclusion. 

For example, learning from the meanings of qualitative or quantitative data related to the marketing funnel, or analyzing conversion or click-through rates to determine how to optimize a marketing strategy.

Sharing findings and receiving advice with communication skills

Employees must be able to communicate effectively to inform their colleagues of their findings when solving problems. This requires not only clear verbal communication skills but also the ability to listen and interpret the advice of colleagues when discussing the next steps needed to solve the problem.

For instance, if your software development team is looking for ways to fix and roll out a cloud license service, team members will need to share what they’ve learned about their clients and listen to other team members to fix the issues and make the service available.

Approaching the problem with problem-solving skills

To solve problems, candidates and employees will need problem-solving skills as part of their critical thinking mindset. This will include:

Breaking the problem down into smaller parts

Using analytical and critical thinking to solve the problem

Implementing the appropriate strategies to address each of the smaller issues

Since each industry requires different critical thinking sub-skills. The strongest candidates will have critical thinking abilities that are relevant to the industry in which they work. Your candidates should demonstrate that they have the necessary critical thinking sub-skills for the vacant position.

Here is a rundown of several industries and the critical thinking skills they require.

Accountant positions

Accounting candidates must have attention to detail to spot anomalies in figures, as well as critical thinking skills to interpret the story behind the numbers . 

They should also be able to use critical thinking and deductive reasoning to understand the causes of numerical anomalies and devise strategies to solve them.

Business analyst roles

Data inference and communication skills are two critical thinking sub-skills that business analysts should possess. Candidates for these positions should be able to make critical decisions and provide feedback to business leaders that can shape the future of the company.

They should also have critical judgment skills that allow them to make crucial decisions to improve the company’s performance.

Teaching and education jobs

Teachers and educators must be able to think critically to teach and mentor students.  If you’re hiring a teacher , can your candidates effectively handle the process of understanding your students’ learning styles, and can they come up with strategies to deliver and teach lessons that are easily understood?

The problem-solving sub-skill is also important in this field when dealing with behavioral issues in the classroom. Teachers will need to identify the cause of behavioral issues and implement methods to resolve and address them using critical thinking dispositions.

They may also be involved in teaching critical thinking skills or cognitive skills to their students, which necessitates a well-planned teaching strategy.

Legal roles

As stated in Lawyer Monthly , critical thinking for legal positions entails remaining objective when inferring case-related information and comparing the information you have with the facts of relevant cases. 

Legal cases also require more than just a recount of the facts related to the case. Candidates must be able to use critical thinking skills to evaluate the strengths of their arguments and present them persuasively and coherently to solve cases.

Software developer/engineer positions

Switchup emphasizes the importance of critical thinking skills for software developers , explaining that solving problems as they arise is made possible with critical thinking.

Two critical thinking sub-skills for software developers are excellent organizational and time management capabilities, as well as problem-solving abilities. 

Can your software developer candidate create successful software solutions using the data provided to them? Can they effectively communicate with their team members to efficiently resolve errors or bugs in their code? 

Marketing / SEO roles

Candidates for SEO positions must be able to conduct ongoing keyword searches and expand on keyword opportunities. Part of this involves researching keywords related to the articles produced by the marketing team and expanding on keyword clusters which also requires critical thinking.

Because you’ll need to look for several critical thinking sub-skills in candidates and employees, here are four steps you can take to assess them with critical thinking skills tests and make the process easier.

Choose from a selection of skills tests to create an assessment and assess your candidates’ critical thinking skills. These might include:

Problem-solving skills  

Communication skills  

Attention to detail

Part of a critical thinking assessment involves requesting candidates to decide on the validity of a conclusive statement by using a set of information and evidence. Look for candidates who recognize which conclusions are linked to the evidence, and which are not; those that can differentiate between these two have top critical thinking skills.

During a critical thinking skills assessment, candidates will be expected to deduce the strength and validity of a set of arguments. Can your candidates deduce which of the arguments adequately support the main statement, and which fail to do so?

Use the results of this part of the assessment and make comparisons between candidates to recognize which candidates have the best critical thinking skills.

How skilled are your candidates at evaluating assumptions? This is another way to assess critical thinking skills using a skills assessment. Candidates who can use deductive reasoning skills to deduce whether an assumption is true have the best critical thinking skills.

Use the results to generate interview questions and invite candidates to the next round.

There are four major advantages to using a critical thinking assessment to test a candidate’s or employee’s critical thinking ability:

Assess critical thinking skills to find out if candidates can enhance productivity

Critical thinking can make a difference in communication and, as a result, productivity in the workplace. For this reason, knowing which candidates have the required critical thinking skills that can boost productivity is crucial; it’s one reason why assessing critical thinking skills is beneficial to your business.

Evaluate critical thinking to learn if candidates can save your organization time

Can your candidates use critical thinking skills to save your organization time when completing a project or task? Assessing critical thinking skills is beneficial as it helps you find out if candidates or employees are capable of this. 

Assessing critical thinking skills with a timed critical thinking assessment is also beneficial as you’ll learn which candidates are the strongest for your organization. Candidates who can correctly solve these challenging deductive reasoning questions within a shorter time than others can potentially help your business save time.

Find out if a candidate’s critical thinking skills suit your business

Since you’ll find out if a candidate’s approach to critical thinking suits your organization by assessing their critical thinking skills, use a critical thinking assessment to help you achieve this for various roles – keep in mind that 75% of professions describe critical thinking as a required skill .

If you’re hiring for many different positions within your organization such as legal secretary roles or lawyer positions, and they all require critical thinking skills, analytical skills, or deductive reasoning abilities, a critical thinking skills test will rigorously test your candidates for each of these particular skills in your business. 

Bridge a critical thinking and analytical skills gap in your organization

The University of Massachusetts suggests that there is ample evidence that critical thinking can be taught , and assessing critical thinking skills can help with this. In the context of the workplace and skills testing, employers can use critical skills test results to assess the baseline of their employees’ critical thinking and analytical skills. 

They can then plan towards suitable training sessions to enhance their analytical and critical thinking skills, which is why assessing critical thinking skills is beneficial. 

For instance, to enhance critical thinking skills, teach your employees to:

Weigh up the pros and cons of a situation

Conduct the right research

Break down projects into smaller sections

Double-check a potential solution to a problem

There’s no denying that critical thinking tests can help you make better hiring decisions. However, keep in mind that there are several sub-skills to consider and that the specific role you’re hiring for will require a distinct set of critical thinking sub-skills.Critical thinking tests can assist you in hiring talent with the right critical thinking skills for your organization. Evaluating critical thinking doesn’t have to be complicated. Hire with confidence by checking out TestGorilla’s critical thinking tests and hire the best, faster and bias-free.

Related posts

40 Tableau interview questions to hire skilled data analysts and developers

Top 45 Spark interview questions to find the best data engineers

How to hire an outreach manager: Key strategies and tips

Hire the best candidates with TestGorilla

Create pre-employment assessments in minutes to screen candidates, save time, and hire the best talent.

Latest posts

The best advice in pre-employment testing, in your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

Hire the best. No bias. No stress.

Our screening tests identify the best candidates and make your hiring decisions faster, easier, and bias-free.

Free resources

This checklist covers key features you should look for when choosing a skills testing platform

This resource will help you develop an onboarding checklist for new hires.

How to assess your candidates' attention to detail.

Learn how to get human resources certified through HRCI or SHRM.

Learn how you can improve the level of talent at your company.

Learn how CapitalT reduced hiring bias with online skills assessments.

Learn how to make the resume process more efficient and more effective.

Improve your hiring strategy with these 7 critical recruitment metrics.

Learn how Sukhi decreased time spent reviewing resumes by 83%!

Hire more efficiently with these hacks that 99% of recruiters aren't using.

Make a business case for diversity and inclusion initiatives with this data.

Why Schools Need to Change Yes, We Can Define, Teach, and Assess Critical Thinking Skills

Jeff Heyck-Williams (He, His, Him) Director of the Two Rivers Learning Institute in Washington, DC

Today’s learners face an uncertain present and a rapidly changing future that demand far different skills and knowledge than were needed in the 20th century. We also know so much more about enabling deep, powerful learning than we ever did before. Our collective future depends on how well young people prepare for the challenges and opportunities of 21st-century life.

Critical thinking is a thing. We can define it; we can teach it; and we can assess it.

While the idea of teaching critical thinking has been bandied around in education circles since at least the time of John Dewey, it has taken greater prominence in the education debates with the advent of the term “21st century skills” and discussions of deeper learning. There is increasing agreement among education reformers that critical thinking is an essential ingredient for long-term success for all of our students.

However, there are still those in the education establishment and in the media who argue that critical thinking isn’t really a thing, or that these skills aren’t well defined and, even if they could be defined, they can’t be taught or assessed.

To those naysayers, I have to disagree. Critical thinking is a thing. We can define it; we can teach it; and we can assess it. In fact, as part of a multi-year Assessment for Learning Project , Two Rivers Public Charter School in Washington, D.C., has done just that.

Before I dive into what we have done, I want to acknowledge that some of the criticism has merit.

First, there are those that argue that critical thinking can only exist when students have a vast fund of knowledge. Meaning that a student cannot think critically if they don’t have something substantive about which to think. I agree. Students do need a robust foundation of core content knowledge to effectively think critically. Schools still have a responsibility for building students’ content knowledge.

However, I would argue that students don’t need to wait to think critically until after they have mastered some arbitrary amount of knowledge. They can start building critical thinking skills when they walk in the door. All students come to school with experience and knowledge which they can immediately think critically about. In fact, some of the thinking that they learn to do helps augment and solidify the discipline-specific academic knowledge that they are learning.

The second criticism is that critical thinking skills are always highly contextual. In this argument, the critics make the point that the types of thinking that students do in history is categorically different from the types of thinking students do in science or math. Thus, the idea of teaching broadly defined, content-neutral critical thinking skills is impossible. I agree that there are domain-specific thinking skills that students should learn in each discipline. However, I also believe that there are several generalizable skills that elementary school students can learn that have broad applicability to their academic and social lives. That is what we have done at Two Rivers.

Defining Critical Thinking Skills

We began this work by first defining what we mean by critical thinking. After a review of the literature and looking at the practice at other schools, we identified five constructs that encompass a set of broadly applicable skills: schema development and activation; effective reasoning; creativity and innovation; problem solving; and decision making.

We then created rubrics to provide a concrete vision of what each of these constructs look like in practice. Working with the Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity (SCALE) , we refined these rubrics to capture clear and discrete skills.

For example, we defined effective reasoning as the skill of creating an evidence-based claim: students need to construct a claim, identify relevant support, link their support to their claim, and identify possible questions or counter claims. Rubrics provide an explicit vision of the skill of effective reasoning for students and teachers. By breaking the rubrics down for different grade bands, we have been able not only to describe what reasoning is but also to delineate how the skills develop in students from preschool through 8th grade.

Before moving on, I want to freely acknowledge that in narrowly defining reasoning as the construction of evidence-based claims we have disregarded some elements of reasoning that students can and should learn. For example, the difference between constructing claims through deductive versus inductive means is not highlighted in our definition. However, by privileging a definition that has broad applicability across disciplines, we are able to gain traction in developing the roots of critical thinking. In this case, to formulate well-supported claims or arguments.

Teaching Critical Thinking Skills

The definitions of critical thinking constructs were only useful to us in as much as they translated into practical skills that teachers could teach and students could learn and use. Consequently, we have found that to teach a set of cognitive skills, we needed thinking routines that defined the regular application of these critical thinking and problem-solving skills across domains. Building on Harvard’s Project Zero Visible Thinking work, we have named routines aligned with each of our constructs.

For example, with the construct of effective reasoning, we aligned the Claim-Support-Question thinking routine to our rubric. Teachers then were able to teach students that whenever they were making an argument, the norm in the class was to use the routine in constructing their claim and support. The flexibility of the routine has allowed us to apply it from preschool through 8th grade and across disciplines from science to economics and from math to literacy.

Kathryn Mancino, a 5th grade teacher at Two Rivers, has deliberately taught three of our thinking routines to students using the anchor charts above. Her charts name the components of each routine and has a place for students to record when they’ve used it and what they have figured out about the routine. By using this structure with a chart that can be added to throughout the year, students see the routines as broadly applicable across disciplines and are able to refine their application over time.

Assessing Critical Thinking Skills

By defining specific constructs of critical thinking and building thinking routines that support their implementation in classrooms, we have operated under the assumption that students are developing skills that they will be able to transfer to other settings. However, we recognized both the importance and the challenge of gathering reliable data to confirm this.

With this in mind, we have developed a series of short performance tasks around novel discipline-neutral contexts in which students can apply the constructs of thinking. Through these tasks, we have been able to provide an opportunity for students to demonstrate their ability to transfer the types of thinking beyond the original classroom setting. Once again, we have worked with SCALE to define tasks where students easily access the content but where the cognitive lift requires them to demonstrate their thinking abilities.

These assessments demonstrate that it is possible to capture meaningful data on students’ critical thinking abilities. They are not intended to be high stakes accountability measures. Instead, they are designed to give students, teachers, and school leaders discrete formative data on hard to measure skills.

While it is clearly difficult, and we have not solved all of the challenges to scaling assessments of critical thinking, we can define, teach, and assess these skills . In fact, knowing how important they are for the economy of the future and our democracy, it is essential that we do.

Jeff Heyck-Williams (He, His, Him)

Director of the two rivers learning institute.

Jeff Heyck-Williams is the director of the Two Rivers Learning Institute and a founder of Two Rivers Public Charter School. He has led work around creating school-wide cultures of mathematics, developing assessments of critical thinking and problem-solving, and supporting project-based learning.

Read More About Why Schools Need to Change

Bring Your Vision for Student Success to Life with NGLC and Bravely

March 13, 2024

For Ethical AI, Listen to Teachers

Jason Wilmot

October 23, 2023

Turning School Libraries into Discipline Centers Is Not the Answer to Disruptive Classroom Behavior

Stephanie McGary

October 4, 2023

Classroom Q&A

With larry ferlazzo.

In this EdWeek blog, an experiment in knowledge-gathering, Ferlazzo will address readers’ questions on classroom management, ELL instruction, lesson planning, and other issues facing teachers. Send your questions to [email protected]. Read more from this blog.

Eight Instructional Strategies for Promoting Critical Thinking

• Share article

(This is the first post in a three-part series.)

The new question-of-the-week is:

What is critical thinking and how can we integrate it into the classroom?

This three-part series will explore what critical thinking is, if it can be specifically taught and, if so, how can teachers do so in their classrooms.

Today’s guests are Dara Laws Savage, Patrick Brown, Meg Riordan, Ph.D., and Dr. PJ Caposey. Dara, Patrick, and Meg were also guests on my 10-minute BAM! Radio Show . You can also find a list of, and links to, previous shows here.

You might also be interested in The Best Resources On Teaching & Learning Critical Thinking In The Classroom .

Current Events

Dara Laws Savage is an English teacher at the Early College High School at Delaware State University, where she serves as a teacher and instructional coach and lead mentor. Dara has been teaching for 25 years (career preparation, English, photography, yearbook, newspaper, and graphic design) and has presented nationally on project-based learning and technology integration:

There is so much going on right now and there is an overload of information for us to process. Did you ever stop to think how our students are processing current events? They see news feeds, hear news reports, and scan photos and posts, but are they truly thinking about what they are hearing and seeing?

I tell my students that my job is not to give them answers but to teach them how to think about what they read and hear. So what is critical thinking and how can we integrate it into the classroom? There are just as many definitions of critical thinking as there are people trying to define it. However, the Critical Think Consortium focuses on the tools to create a thinking-based classroom rather than a definition: “Shape the climate to support thinking, create opportunities for thinking, build capacity to think, provide guidance to inform thinking.” Using these four criteria and pairing them with current events, teachers easily create learning spaces that thrive on thinking and keep students engaged.

One successful technique I use is the FIRE Write. Students are given a quote, a paragraph, an excerpt, or a photo from the headlines. Students are asked to F ocus and respond to the selection for three minutes. Next, students are asked to I dentify a phrase or section of the photo and write for two minutes. Third, students are asked to R eframe their response around a specific word, phrase, or section within their previous selection. Finally, students E xchange their thoughts with a classmate. Within the exchange, students also talk about how the selection connects to what we are covering in class.

There was a controversial Pepsi ad in 2017 involving Kylie Jenner and a protest with a police presence. The imagery in the photo was strikingly similar to a photo that went viral with a young lady standing opposite a police line. Using that image from a current event engaged my students and gave them the opportunity to critically think about events of the time.

Here are the two photos and a student response:

F - Focus on both photos and respond for three minutes

In the first picture, you see a strong and courageous black female, bravely standing in front of two officers in protest. She is risking her life to do so. Iesha Evans is simply proving to the world she does NOT mean less because she is black … and yet officers are there to stop her. She did not step down. In the picture below, you see Kendall Jenner handing a police officer a Pepsi. Maybe this wouldn’t be a big deal, except this was Pepsi’s weak, pathetic, and outrageous excuse of a commercial that belittles the whole movement of people fighting for their lives.

I - Identify a word or phrase, underline it, then write about it for two minutes

A white, privileged female in place of a fighting black woman was asking for trouble. A struggle we are continuously fighting every day, and they make a mockery of it. “I know what will work! Here Mr. Police Officer! Drink some Pepsi!” As if. Pepsi made a fool of themselves, and now their already dwindling fan base continues to ever shrink smaller.

R - Reframe your thoughts by choosing a different word, then write about that for one minute

You don’t know privilege until it’s gone. You don’t know privilege while it’s there—but you can and will be made accountable and aware. Don’t use it for evil. You are not stupid. Use it to do something. Kendall could’ve NOT done the commercial. Kendall could’ve released another commercial standing behind a black woman. Anything!

Exchange - Remember to discuss how this connects to our school song project and our previous discussions?

This connects two ways - 1) We want to convey a strong message. Be powerful. Show who we are. And Pepsi definitely tried. … Which leads to the second connection. 2) Not mess up and offend anyone, as had the one alma mater had been linked to black minstrels. We want to be amazing, but we have to be smart and careful and make sure we include everyone who goes to our school and everyone who may go to our school.

As a final step, students read and annotate the full article and compare it to their initial response.

Using current events and critical-thinking strategies like FIRE writing helps create a learning space where thinking is the goal rather than a score on a multiple-choice assessment. Critical-thinking skills can cross over to any of students’ other courses and into life outside the classroom. After all, we as teachers want to help the whole student be successful, and critical thinking is an important part of navigating life after they leave our classrooms.

‘Before-Explore-Explain’

Patrick Brown is the executive director of STEM and CTE for the Fort Zumwalt school district in Missouri and an experienced educator and author :

Planning for critical thinking focuses on teaching the most crucial science concepts, practices, and logical-thinking skills as well as the best use of instructional time. One way to ensure that lessons maintain a focus on critical thinking is to focus on the instructional sequence used to teach.

Explore-before-explain teaching is all about promoting critical thinking for learners to better prepare students for the reality of their world. What having an explore-before-explain mindset means is that in our planning, we prioritize giving students firsthand experiences with data, allow students to construct evidence-based claims that focus on conceptual understanding, and challenge students to discuss and think about the why behind phenomena.

Just think of the critical thinking that has to occur for students to construct a scientific claim. 1) They need the opportunity to collect data, analyze it, and determine how to make sense of what the data may mean. 2) With data in hand, students can begin thinking about the validity and reliability of their experience and information collected. 3) They can consider what differences, if any, they might have if they completed the investigation again. 4) They can scrutinize outlying data points for they may be an artifact of a true difference that merits further exploration of a misstep in the procedure, measuring device, or measurement. All of these intellectual activities help them form more robust understanding and are evidence of their critical thinking.

In explore-before-explain teaching, all of these hard critical-thinking tasks come before teacher explanations of content. Whether we use discovery experiences, problem-based learning, and or inquiry-based activities, strategies that are geared toward helping students construct understanding promote critical thinking because students learn content by doing the practices valued in the field to generate knowledge.

An Issue of Equity

Meg Riordan, Ph.D., is the chief learning officer at The Possible Project, an out-of-school program that collaborates with youth to build entrepreneurial skills and mindsets and provides pathways to careers and long-term economic prosperity. She has been in the field of education for over 25 years as a middle and high school teacher, school coach, college professor, regional director of N.Y.C. Outward Bound Schools, and director of external research with EL Education:

Although critical thinking often defies straightforward definition, most in the education field agree it consists of several components: reasoning, problem-solving, and decisionmaking, plus analysis and evaluation of information, such that multiple sides of an issue can be explored. It also includes dispositions and “the willingness to apply critical-thinking principles, rather than fall back on existing unexamined beliefs, or simply believe what you’re told by authority figures.”

Despite variation in definitions, critical thinking is nonetheless promoted as an essential outcome of students’ learning—we want to see students and adults demonstrate it across all fields, professions, and in their personal lives. Yet there is simultaneously a rationing of opportunities in schools for students of color, students from under-resourced communities, and other historically marginalized groups to deeply learn and practice critical thinking.

For example, many of our most underserved students often spend class time filling out worksheets, promoting high compliance but low engagement, inquiry, critical thinking, or creation of new ideas. At a time in our world when college and careers are critical for participation in society and the global, knowledge-based economy, far too many students struggle within classrooms and schools that reinforce low-expectations and inequity.

If educators aim to prepare all students for an ever-evolving marketplace and develop skills that will be valued no matter what tomorrow’s jobs are, then we must move critical thinking to the forefront of classroom experiences. And educators must design learning to cultivate it.

So, what does that really look like?

Unpack and define critical thinking

To understand critical thinking, educators need to first unpack and define its components. What exactly are we looking for when we speak about reasoning or exploring multiple perspectives on an issue? How does problem-solving show up in English, math, science, art, or other disciplines—and how is it assessed? At Two Rivers, an EL Education school, the faculty identified five constructs of critical thinking, defined each, and created rubrics to generate a shared picture of quality for teachers and students. The rubrics were then adapted across grade levels to indicate students’ learning progressions.

At Avenues World School, critical thinking is one of the Avenues World Elements and is an enduring outcome embedded in students’ early experiences through 12th grade. For instance, a kindergarten student may be expected to “identify cause and effect in familiar contexts,” while an 8th grader should demonstrate the ability to “seek out sufficient evidence before accepting a claim as true,” “identify bias in claims and evidence,” and “reconsider strongly held points of view in light of new evidence.”

When faculty and students embrace a common vision of what critical thinking looks and sounds like and how it is assessed, educators can then explicitly design learning experiences that call for students to employ critical-thinking skills. This kind of work must occur across all schools and programs, especially those serving large numbers of students of color. As Linda Darling-Hammond asserts , “Schools that serve large numbers of students of color are least likely to offer the kind of curriculum needed to ... help students attain the [critical-thinking] skills needed in a knowledge work economy. ”

So, what can it look like to create those kinds of learning experiences?

Designing experiences for critical thinking

After defining a shared understanding of “what” critical thinking is and “how” it shows up across multiple disciplines and grade levels, it is essential to create learning experiences that impel students to cultivate, practice, and apply these skills. There are several levers that offer pathways for teachers to promote critical thinking in lessons:

1.Choose Compelling Topics: Keep it relevant

A key Common Core State Standard asks for students to “write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.” That might not sound exciting or culturally relevant. But a learning experience designed for a 12th grade humanities class engaged learners in a compelling topic— policing in America —to analyze and evaluate multiple texts (including primary sources) and share the reasoning for their perspectives through discussion and writing. Students grappled with ideas and their beliefs and employed deep critical-thinking skills to develop arguments for their claims. Embedding critical-thinking skills in curriculum that students care about and connect with can ignite powerful learning experiences.

2. Make Local Connections: Keep it real

At The Possible Project , an out-of-school-time program designed to promote entrepreneurial skills and mindsets, students in a recent summer online program (modified from in-person due to COVID-19) explored the impact of COVID-19 on their communities and local BIPOC-owned businesses. They learned interviewing skills through a partnership with Everyday Boston , conducted virtual interviews with entrepreneurs, evaluated information from their interviews and local data, and examined their previously held beliefs. They created blog posts and videos to reflect on their learning and consider how their mindsets had changed as a result of the experience. In this way, we can design powerful community-based learning and invite students into productive struggle with multiple perspectives.

3. Create Authentic Projects: Keep it rigorous

At Big Picture Learning schools, students engage in internship-based learning experiences as a central part of their schooling. Their school-based adviser and internship-based mentor support them in developing real-world projects that promote deeper learning and critical-thinking skills. Such authentic experiences teach “young people to be thinkers, to be curious, to get from curiosity to creation … and it helps students design a learning experience that answers their questions, [providing an] opportunity to communicate it to a larger audience—a major indicator of postsecondary success.” Even in a remote environment, we can design projects that ask more of students than rote memorization and that spark critical thinking.

Our call to action is this: As educators, we need to make opportunities for critical thinking available not only to the affluent or those fortunate enough to be placed in advanced courses. The tools are available, let’s use them. Let’s interrogate our current curriculum and design learning experiences that engage all students in real, relevant, and rigorous experiences that require critical thinking and prepare them for promising postsecondary pathways.

Critical Thinking & Student Engagement

Dr. PJ Caposey is an award-winning educator, keynote speaker, consultant, and author of seven books who currently serves as the superintendent of schools for the award-winning Meridian CUSD 223 in northwest Illinois. You can find PJ on most social-media platforms as MCUSDSupe:

When I start my keynote on student engagement, I invite two people up on stage and give them each five paper balls to shoot at a garbage can also conveniently placed on stage. Contestant One shoots their shot, and the audience gives approval. Four out of 5 is a heckuva score. Then just before Contestant Two shoots, I blindfold them and start moving the garbage can back and forth. I usually try to ensure that they can at least make one of their shots. Nobody is successful in this unfair environment.

I thank them and send them back to their seats and then explain that this little activity was akin to student engagement. While we all know we want student engagement, we are shooting at different targets. More importantly, for teachers, it is near impossible for them to hit a target that is moving and that they cannot see.

Within the world of education and particularly as educational leaders, we have failed to simplify what student engagement looks like, and it is impossible to define or articulate what student engagement looks like if we cannot clearly articulate what critical thinking is and looks like in a classroom. Because, simply, without critical thought, there is no engagement.

The good news here is that critical thought has been defined and placed into taxonomies for decades already. This is not something new and not something that needs to be redefined. I am a Bloom’s person, but there is nothing wrong with DOK or some of the other taxonomies, either. To be precise, I am a huge fan of Daggett’s Rigor and Relevance Framework. I have used that as a core element of my practice for years, and it has shaped who I am as an instructional leader.

So, in order to explain critical thought, a teacher or a leader must familiarize themselves with these tried and true taxonomies. Easy, right? Yes, sort of. The issue is not understanding what critical thought is; it is the ability to integrate it into the classrooms. In order to do so, there are a four key steps every educator must take.

• Integrating critical thought/rigor into a lesson does not happen by chance, it happens by design. Planning for critical thought and engagement is much different from planning for a traditional lesson. In order to plan for kids to think critically, you have to provide a base of knowledge and excellent prompts to allow them to explore their own thinking in order to analyze, evaluate, or synthesize information.
• SIDE NOTE – Bloom’s verbs are a great way to start when writing objectives, but true planning will take you deeper than this.

QUESTIONING

• If the questions and prompts given in a classroom have correct answers or if the teacher ends up answering their own questions, the lesson will lack critical thought and rigor.
• Script five questions forcing higher-order thought prior to every lesson. Experienced teachers may not feel they need this, but it helps to create an effective habit.
• If lessons are rigorous and assessments are not, students will do well on their assessments, and that may not be an accurate representation of the knowledge and skills they have mastered. If lessons are easy and assessments are rigorous, the exact opposite will happen. When deciding to increase critical thought, it must happen in all three phases of the game: planning, instruction, and assessment.

TALK TIME / CONTROL

• To increase rigor, the teacher must DO LESS. This feels counterintuitive but is accurate. Rigorous lessons involving tons of critical thought must allow for students to work on their own, collaborate with peers, and connect their ideas. This cannot happen in a silent room except for the teacher talking. In order to increase rigor, decrease talk time and become comfortable with less control. Asking questions and giving prompts that lead to no true correct answer also means less control. This is a tough ask for some teachers. Explained differently, if you assign one assignment and get 30 very similar products, you have most likely assigned a low-rigor recipe. If you assign one assignment and get multiple varied products, then the students have had a chance to think deeply, and you have successfully integrated critical thought into your classroom.

Thanks to Dara, Patrick, Meg, and PJ for their contributions!

Please feel free to leave a comment with your reactions to the topic or directly to anything that has been said in this post.

Consider contributing a question to be answered in a future post. You can send one to me at [email protected] . When you send it in, let me know if I can use your real name if it’s selected or if you’d prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

You can also contact me on Twitter at @Larryferlazzo .

Education Week has published a collection of posts from this blog, along with new material, in an e-book form. It’s titled Classroom Management Q&As: Expert Strategies for Teaching .

Just a reminder; you can subscribe and receive updates from this blog via email (The RSS feed for this blog, and for all Ed Week articles, has been changed by the new redesign—new ones won’t be available until February). And if you missed any of the highlights from the first nine years of this blog, you can see a categorized list below.

• This Year’s Most Popular Q&A Posts
• Race & Racism in Schools
• School Closures & the Coronavirus Crisis
• Classroom-Management Advice
• Best Ways to Begin the School Year
• Best Ways to End the School Year
• Student Motivation & Social-Emotional Learning
• Implementing the Common Core
• Facing Gender Challenges in Education
• Teaching Social Studies
• Cooperative & Collaborative Learning
• Using Tech in the Classroom
• Student Voices
• Parent Engagement in Schools
• Teaching English-Language Learners
• Reading Instruction
• Writing Instruction
• Education Policy Issues
• Differentiating Instruction
• Math Instruction
• Science Instruction
• Advice for New Teachers
• Author Interviews
• Entering the Teaching Profession
• The Inclusive Classroom
• Learning & the Brain
• Administrator Leadership
• Teacher Leadership
• Relationships in Schools
• Professional Development
• Instructional Strategies
• Best of Classroom Q&A
• Professional Collaboration
• Classroom Organization
• Mistakes in Education
• Project-Based Learning

I am also creating a Twitter list including all contributors to this column .

The opinions expressed in Classroom Q&A With Larry Ferlazzo are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Sign Up for EdWeek Update

Edweek top school jobs.

Sign Up & Sign In

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• Applying Critical Thinking
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

Critical thinking refers to deliberately scrutinizing and evaluating theories, concepts, or ideas using reasoned reflection and analysis. The act of thinking critically implies moving beyond simply understanding information, but rather, questioning its source, its production, and its presentation in order to expose potential bias or researcher subjectivity [i.e., being influenced by personal opinions and feelings rather than by external determinants ] . Applying critical thinking to investigating a research problem involves actively challenging assumptions and questioning the choices and potential motives underpinning how the author designed the study, conducted the research, and arrived at particular conclusions or recommended courses of action.

Mintz, Steven. "How the Word "Critical" Came to Signify the Leading Edge of Cultural Analysis." Higher Ed Gamma Blog , Inside Higher Ed, February 13, 2024; Van Merriënboer, Jeroen JG and Paul A. Kirschner. Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-component Instructional Design . New York: Routledge, 2017.

Thinking Critically

Applying Critical Thinking to Research and Writing

Professors like to use the term critical thinking; in fact, the idea of being a critical thinker permeates much of higher education writ large. In the classroom, the idea of thinking critically is often mentioned by professors when students ask how they should approach a research and writing assignment [other approaches your professor might mention include interdisciplinarity, comparative, gendered, global, etc.]. However, critical thinking is more than just an approach to research and writing. It is an acquired skill associated with becoming a complex learner capable of discerning important relationships among the elements of, as well as integrating multiple ways of understanding applied to, the research problem. Critical thinking is a lens through which you holistically interrogate a topic.

Given this, thinking critically encompasses a variety of inter-related connotations applied to writing a college-level research paper:

• Integrated and Multi-Dimensional . Critical thinking is not focused on any one element of research, but instead, is applied holistically throughout the process of identifying the research problem, reviewing the literature, applying methods of analysis, describing the results, discussing their implications, and, if appropriate, offering recommendations for further research. It permeates the entire research endeavor from contemplating what to write to proofreading the final product.
• Humanizes the Research . Thinking critically can help humanize what is being studied by extending the scope of the analysis beyond the traditional boundaries of prior research. This could have involved, for example, sampling homogeneous populations, considering only certain factors related to the investigation of a phenomenon, or limiting the way authors framed or contextualized their study. Critical thinking creates opportunities to incorporate the experiences of others into the research process, leading to a more inclusive and representative examination of the topic.
• Non-Linear . This refers to analyzing a research problem in ways that do not rely on sequential decision-making or rational forms of reasoning. Creative thinking relies on intuitive judgement, flexibility, and unconventional approaches to investigating complex phenomena in order to discover new insights, connections, and potential solutions . This involves going back and modifying your thinking as new evidence emerges , perhaps multiple times throughout the research process, and drawing conclusions from multiple perspectives.
• Normative . This is the idea that critical thinking can be used to challenge prior assumptions in ways that advocate for social justice, equity, and inclusion and which can lead to research having a more transformative and expansive impact. In this respect, critical thinking can be a method for breaking away from dominant culture norms so as to produce research outcomes that illuminate previously hidden aspects of exploitation and injustice.
• Power Dynamics . Research in the social and behavioral sciences often includes examining aspects of power and influence that shape social relations, organizations, institutions, and the production and maintenance of knowledge. This approach encompasses studying how power operates, how it can be acquired, and how power and influence can be maintained. Critical thinking can reveal how societal structures perpetuate power and influence in ways that marginalizes and oppresses certain groups or communities within the contexts of history , politics, economics, culture, and other factors.
• Reflection . A key aspect of critical thinking is practicing reflexivity; the act of turning ideas and concepts back onto yourself in order to reveal and clarify your own beliefs, assumptions, and perspectives. Being critically reflexive is important because it can reveal hidden biases you may have that could unintentionally influence how you interpret and validate information. The more reflexive you are, the better able and more comfortable you are about opening yourself up to new modes of understanding.
• Rigorous Questioning . Thinking critically is guided by asking questions that lead to addressing complex concepts, principles, theories, or problems more effectively and to help distinguish what is known from from what is not known [or that may be hidden]. In this way, critical thinking involves deliberately framing inquiries not just as research questions, but as a way to focus on systematic, disciplined,  in-depth questioning concerning the research problem and your positionality as a researcher.
• Social Change . An overarching goal of critical thinking applied to research and writing is to seek to identify and challenge sources of inequality, exploitation, oppression, and marinalization that contributes to maintaining the status quo within institutions of society. This can include entities, such as, schools, courts, businesses, government agencies, or religious centers, that have been created and maintained through certain ways of thinking within the dominant culture.

Although critical thinking permeates the entire research and writing process, it applies most directly to the literature review and discussion sections of your paper . In reviewing the literature, it is important to reflect upon specific aspects of a study, such as, determining if the research design effectively establishes cause and effect relationships or provides insight into explaining why certain phenomena do or do not occur, assessing whether the method of gathering data or information supports the objectives of the study, and evaluating if the assumptions used t o arrive at a specific conclusion are evidence-based and relevant to addressing the research problem. An assessment of whether a source is helpful to investigating the research problem also involves critically analyzing how the research challenges conventional approaches to investigations that perpetuate inequalities or hides the voices of others.

Critical thinking also applies to the discussion section of your paper because this is where you internalize the findings of your study and explain its significance. This involves more than summarizing findings and describing outcomes. It includes reflecting on their importance and providing reasoned explanations why your paper is important in filling a gap in the literature or expanding knowledge and understanding in ways that inform practice. Critical reflection helps you think introspectively about your own beliefs concerning the significance of the findings, but in ways that avoid biased judgment and decision making.

Behar-Horenstein, Linda S., and Lian Niu. “Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of College Teaching and Learning 8 (February 2011): 25-41; Bayou, Yemeserach and Tamene Kitila. "Exploring Instructors’ Beliefs about and Practices in Promoting Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Writing Classes." GIST–Education and Learning Research Journal 26 (2023): 123-154; Butcher, Charity. "Using In-class Writing to Promote Critical Thinking and Application of Course Concepts." Journal of Political Science Education 18 (2022): 3-21; Loseke, Donileen R. Methodological Thinking: Basic Principles of Social Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012; Mintz, Steven. "How the Word "Critical" Came to Signify the Leading Edge of Cultural Analysis." Higher Ed Gamma Blog , Inside Higher Ed, February 13, 2024; Hart, Claire et al. “Exploring Higher Education Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through Content Analysis.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 41 (September 2021): 100877; Lewis, Arthur and David Smith. "Defining Higher Order Thinking." Theory into Practice 32 (Summer 1993): 131-137; Sabrina, R., Emilda Sulasmi, and Mandra Saragih. "Student Critical Thinking Skills and Student Writing Ability: The Role of Teachers' Intellectual Skills and Student Learning." Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 17 (2022): 2493-2510. Suter, W. Newton. Introduction to Educational Research: A Critical Thinking Approach. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2012; Van Merriënboer, Jeroen JG and Paul A. Kirschner. Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-component Instructional Design. New York: Routledge, 2017; Vance, Charles M., et al. "Understanding and Measuring Linear–Nonlinear Thinking Style for Enhanced Management Education and Professional Practice." Academy of Management Learning and Education 6 (2007): 167-185; Yeh, Hui-Chin, Shih-hsien Yang, Jo Shan Fu, and Yen-Chen Shih. "Developing College Students’ Critical Thinking through Reflective Writing." Higher Education Research & Development 42 (2023): 244-259.

• << Previous: Academic Writing Style
• Next: Choosing a Title >>
• Last Updated: Apr 15, 2024 12:53 PM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Critical thinking definition

Critical thinking, as described by Oxford Languages, is the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement.

Active and skillful approach, evaluation, assessment, synthesis, and/or evaluation of information obtained from, or made by, observation, knowledge, reflection, acumen or conversation, as a guide to belief and action, requires the critical thinking process, which is why it's often used in education and academics.

Some even may view it as a backbone of modern thought.

However, it's a skill, and skills must be trained and encouraged to be used at its full potential.

People turn up to various approaches in improving their critical thinking, like:

• Developing technical and problem-solving skills
• Engaging in more active listening
• Actively questioning their assumptions and beliefs
• Seeking out more diversity of thought
• Opening up their curiosity in an intellectual way etc.

Is critical thinking useful in writing?

Critical thinking can help in planning your paper and making it more concise, but it's not obvious at first. We carefully pinpointed some the questions you should ask yourself when boosting critical thinking in writing:

• What information should be included?
• Which information resources should the author look to?
• What degree of technical knowledge should the report assume its audience has?
• What is the most effective way to show information?
• How should the report be organized?
• How should it be designed?
• What tone and level of language difficulty should the document have?

Usage of critical thinking comes down not only to the outline of your paper, it also begs the question: How can we use critical thinking solving problems in our writing's topic?

Let's say, you have a Powerpoint on how critical thinking can reduce poverty in the United States. You'll primarily have to define critical thinking for the viewers, as well as use a lot of critical thinking questions and synonyms to get them to be familiar with your methods and start the thinking process behind it.

Are there any services that can help me use more critical thinking?

We understand that it's difficult to learn how to use critical thinking more effectively in just one article, but our service is here to help.

We are a team specializing in writing essays and other assignments for college students and all other types of customers who need a helping hand in its making. We cover a great range of topics, offer perfect quality work, always deliver on time and aim to leave our customers completely satisfied with what they ordered.

The ordering process is fully online, and it goes as follows:

• Select the topic and the deadline of your essay.
• Provide us with any details, requirements, statements that should be emphasized or particular parts of the essay writing process you struggle with.
• Leave the email address, where your completed order will be sent to.
• Select your prefered payment type, sit back and relax!

With lots of experience on the market, professionally degreed essay writers , online 24/7 customer support and incredibly low prices, you won't find a service offering a better deal than ours.

StarsInsider

Ways to improve your critical thinking

Posted: March 26, 2024 | Last updated: March 26, 2024

Critical thinking is an essential skill for anyone who wishes to be successful in business. It is what allows us to analyze information properly to find appropriate solutions to problems. But it is also important to think critically in every day life; it helps us to filter out fake news, for example.

While most of us have a certain level of critical thinking capacity, there is often room for improvement. Check out this gallery for some tips on how to improve your critical thinking.

You may also like: Do you recognize these big TV stars from 10 years ago?

Understand the concept of critical thinking

Before you set about trying to build those critical thinking skills, it is important to first understand what exactly critical thinking is. Put simply, it is the ability to think about ideas and concepts in a critical way.

Follow us and access great exclusive content every day

It is the difference between accepting what you're told at face value and asking questions such as why you're being told that and what is the motivation of the speaker.

You may also like: Scottish landscapes that will take your breath away

Ask questions

It follows, then, that when learning to think critically it is important to ask questions. When you next read a report or listen to a presentation, try and ask as many questions as you can.

Although you run the risk of winding up the presenter, asking questions is in everyone's interest because it can help to expose weaknesses in logic and pave the way for a better solution to a problem.

You may also like: Laugh out loud: The best comedians in history

Question yourself

In addition to asking questions about the information in front of you, it is important also to question your own thoughts and actions on a regular basis.

Questioning yourself will help you identify behaviors that are unhelpful or self-defeating. All too often we continue with a certain behavior because it seems right, when in fact it is making things worse.

You may also like: The (often bizarre) foods historical figures loved

Pay attention to all incoming information

It is paramount that you pay attention to all information coming your way, whether or not it comes from a source or person you agree with.

People without critical thinking skills tend to tune out information that they don't want to hear, when in fact people we don't like nearly always have something useful to say.

You may also like: Funny celebrity moments: pranksters on the red carpet

Develop foresight

Good critical thinking always involves an element of foresight. Successful critical thinkers are able to use the information available to them to predict what will happen in the future.

However, foresight is not about clairvoyants and tarot cards. Instead it is about carefully considering all the possible consequences of a certain action.

You may also like: The dark side of Walt Disney

Reduce time-wasting

Critical thinking, like anything else, takes practice. It is therefore a good idea to rid your life of time-wasting activities, such as Netflix bingeing, so you have more time to practice.

That does not mean to say you shouldn't relax, however. In fact, the brain needs downtime in order to develop. Try and go for something more stimulating, though, like reading a book.

You may also like: Hit songs you didn't know were written by Prince

Plan your day

The more you practice critical thinking, the more easily it will come. In the beginning, however, it takes time. It is therefore important to maximize your time by planning carefully.

Prioritize your tasks and don't bite off more than you can chew. Make sure that you are allowing yourself enough time to really focus on each of your projects and consider them critically.

You may also like: Torture tracks: Songs that have been weaponized

Practice critical thinking in your daily life

Do not limit your critical thinking practice to office hours. While being able to think critically is a must if you want to be successful in business, it is also an important life skill in everyday life.

Next time you are choosing a book to read or watching the news, ask yourself what you want to gain from the book, or why that newsreader is emphasizing a particular story.

You may also like: Famous women who were demonized by the media

Keep a thought journal

Try to keep a record of difficult situations that arise and how you handle them. Writing down your thoughts on such situations will help you to reflect better on your own actions.

It may not be easy at first, but laying bare your reactions to a difficult situation will help you to identify and eliminate destructive behaviors and therefore solve problems more efficiently.

You may also like: Celebrities who were raised by single fathers

Check your ego

Having a big head can inhibit critical thinking since it makes it difficult to be objective when assessing a situation. However, being too altruistic doesn't help either.

Try to assign the same level of importance to both your needs and the needs of others. When analyzing a situation, try to focus on people's motivations; why do they want a certain outcome?

You may also like: Funniest sayings from around the world

Practice active listening

Active listening involves truly paying attention while someone else is talking, and not letting your eyes glaze over and your mind run off elsewhere.

Not only is it rude not to listen properly when someone is presenting, but you will miss important information and/or ideas that should be submitted to your own mental analysis.

You may also like: Bandmates who hated each other

Evaluate existing evidence

If you have a business problem to solve, the likelihood is that someone before you has solved a very similar if not identical issue. Make the most of past learnings to help you in the present.

Ask yourself whether you have encountered the issue before and, if not, speak to others. Use all the information available to you to find a successful solution.

You may also like: These celebrities live in surprisingly modest homes

Engage a mentor

Like many other things in life, critical thinking can be taught. If the tips in this gallery aren't enough, it may be an idea to find a mentor who can help you on your way to becoming a critical thinking expert.

A mentor may be able to frame critical thinking in such a way that it becomes more accessible and natural to you, and they may have resources for you to practice with.

You may also like: Bizarre jobs that no longer exist

Participate in team-building activities

Many team-building activities put on by companies have the aim of improving the critical thinking skills of employees.

Try not to let the thought of your next team-building session fill you with dread. Instead, see it as an opportunity to hone those critical thinking skills and give you a competitive advantage.

You may also like: Bizarre jobs within the British royal household

Take on a leadership role

If you're feeling confident, why not throw yourself in the deep end and volunteer to lead a project? Leaders are required to constantly think critically, meaning you'll have loads of practice.

And as we all know, practice makes perfect. So next time your boss asks for a volunteer to head a new initiative, why not take the plunge?

Sources: (Indeed) (Small Businessify)

See also: 30 fun virtual team building ideas

More for You

Trump Trial Starts With Judge Allowing Jury to Hear About Affair

This Is How Long You Can Leave Butter On the Counter, According to Land O'Lakes

McDonald's menu adds new takes on a fan-favorite sandwich

Taylor Swift Smashes Another Record

Kenny Smith's critique on player earnings in the modern NBA: "I see players today who have holes in their game but make $20 million"

35 People with Higher IQs Than Einstein

One of the best British spy dramas of all time is finally streaming on Netflix

Clarence Thomas inexplicably absent from Supreme Court

Tax Day deals 2024: Score discounts, freebies at Krispy Kreme, Hooters, Potbelly, more

I moved from California to Tennessee for my husband's job. We can finally save money, but it's been a major culture shock.

Explorer Reveals Ernest Shackleton's Perfectly Preserved 116 Year Old Hut In The Antarctic

Kate Martin attends WNBA draft to support Caitlin Clark, gets drafted by Las Vegas in second round

Country announces major plans to ban of gas-powered vehicles in sweeping new law: 'The evidence ... is clear'

28 Trivia Tidbits About Hidden Jokes and References in Pop Culture

Colorado House passes bill banning semiautomatic firearms

Scientists solved the 70-year-old mystery of an insect's invisibility coat that can manipulate light

Burger King's menu adds a new twist on a British classic

Supreme Court Justices Compare Bribes to Taking a Teacher to Cheesecake Factory

David Chang and Momofuku will no longer enforce 'chili crunch' trademark

USA Basketball Finalizes 2024 Paris Olympics Roster Headlined by LeBron James, Steph Curry

Exploring Factors That Support Pre-service Teachers’ Engagement in Learning Artificial Intelligence

• Research Article
• Open access
• Published: 12 April 2024

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Musa Adekunle Ayanwale   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7640-9898 1 ,
• Emmanuel Kwabena Frimpong 2 ,
• Oluwaseyi Aina Gbolade Opesemowo   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0242-7027 1 &
• Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5705-6684 2  

263 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly relevant, and students need to understand the concept. To design an effective AI program for schools, we need to find ways to expose students to AI knowledge, provide AI learning opportunities, and create engaging AI experiences. However, there is a lack of trained teachers who can facilitate students’ AI learning, so we need to focus on developing the capacity of pre-service teachers to teach AI. Since engagement is known to enhance learning, it is necessary to explore how pre-service teachers engage in learning AI. This study aimed to investigate pre-service teachers’ engagement with learning AI after a 4-week AI program at a university. Thirty-five participants took part in the study and reported their perception of engagement with learning AI on a 7-factor scale. The factors assessed in the survey included engagement (cognitive—critical thinking and creativity, behavioral, and social), attitude towards AI, anxiety towards AI, AI readiness, self-transcendent goals, and confidence in learning AI. We used a structural equation modeling approach to test the relationships in our hypothesized model using SmartPLS 4.0. The results of our study supported all our hypotheses, with attitude, anxiety, readiness, self-transcendent goals, and confidence being found to influence engagement. We discuss our findings and consider their implications for practice and policy.

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly relevant globally, integrated into various aspects of human life and sectors, including education (Long & Magerko, 2020 ). The growing importance of AI has led to a demand for its incorporation into school systems. While researchers, practitioners, and education policymakers have recognized the significance of teaching AI in K-12 systems (Ma et al., 2023, Touretzky et al., 2019), limited initiatives have been taken in the context of teacher education (Sanusi et al., 2022 ). Nevertheless, education stakeholders agree about the importance of AI education, as evidenced by the development of tools, curricula activities, and frameworks for effective implementation of AI as a subject or integrated throughout the curriculum (Casal-Otero et al., 2023 ; Mahipal et al., 2023 ; Sanusi, 2023 ). While these initiatives are crucial for promoting AI education in schools, focusing on teacher education is essential (Sanusi et al., 2023 ). Existing literature highlights a need for further work on teacher education programs for AI. Although there are a few initiatives for teacher education on AI, they are primarily conducted as professional development programs. However, to ensure the integration of AI within the K-12 system, future teachers must be prepared to facilitate AI, as it is now considered an essential skill for the future (Frimpong, 2022 ; Park et al., 2023 ).

As a new subject in schools and teacher education programs, learning AI requires new approaches to engage students with learning materials and activities. Engagement is crucial because studies have found a correlation between engagement and learning (Carroll et al., 2021 ; Fredricks et al., 2004 ; Poondej & Lerdpornkulrat, 2016 ). These studies suggest that more engaged students tend to have better learning outcomes. Bryson and Hand ( 2007 ) stated that engagement is key to student autonomy and improved learning overall. Given the importance of engagement, research has been conducted to understand how to increase students’ engagement in learning. For example, Kim et al. ( 2015 ) explored the use of robotics to promote STEM engagement in pre-service teachers, while Volet et al. ( 2019 ) examined engagement in collaborative science learning among pre-service teacher students. Although research on pre-service teachers and engagement in STEM learning continues to grow, there is currently a limited research on student engagement in AI education. Xia et al. ( 2022 ) discussed student engagement from the perspective of self-determination theory, but no study has investigated the factors that influence pre-service teachers’ engagement with AI. Therefore, this research aims to examine the factors that support students’ engagement with AI in the context of teacher education. The framework used in this research combines the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 2020 ) with other constructs, including engagement. By exploring the factors that support pre-service teachers’ engagement in learning AI, this study contributes to the limited literature on developing AI literacy within teacher education programs. The findings of this research will advance our knowledge of how to effectively engage students in learning AI.

To better understand the factors that impact student engagement with learning AI, we conducted an AI intervention for 35 pre-service teachers. We then collected their perspectives using a 7-factor scale, considering engagement (cognitive-critical thinking and creativity, behavioral, and social), intrinsic motivation, attitude towards AI, anxiety towards AI, AI readiness, self-transcendent goals, and confidence in learning AI. To analyze the participants’ data, we utilized SmartPLS 4.0 to perform a variance-based structural equation modeling and evaluate our proposed model. This study is organized as follows: first, we outline the aim of the study; then, we review related research, discuss the theoretical framework, and develop hypotheses in the “Review of Related Work” section. The “ Methodology ” section provides a detailed explanation of the data collection method, participants, and analytical approaches. In the “ Results ” section, we present the findings of the data analysis, followed by a discussion of the implications of the study in the “ Discussion ” section. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the study’s limitations and suggestions for future research.

Review of Related Work

In this section, we reviewed the related works and developed the study hypothesis. We specifically discussed the research that has explored pre-service teachers’ engagement within the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education context. We further explained the theoretical framework that inspired our research, highlighted why exploring engagement in learning AI is essential, and proposed a set of hypotheses based on Fig.  1 .

Research conceptual framework. Note: AT attitude towards AI, AN anxiety towards AI, AR AI readiness, SG self-transcendent goals, CL confidence in learning AI, ENG student engagement in the AI program, CECT cognitive engagement—critical thinking, CEC cognitive engagement—creativity, BESL behavioral engagement—self-directed learning, SOE social engagement

Engagement in the STEM Teacher Education Program

Engagement in STEM teacher education programs is crucial for improving student outcomes in STEM subjects. Research has shown that active engagement in STEM education leads to higher-order thinking skills, increased motivation, and improved achievement in learning activities (Kamarrudin et al., 2023 ). Engagement in STEM learning has been recognized as beneficial for preparing students to address real-world problems (Dong et al., 2019 ; Kim et al., 2015 ). Challenges in implementing integrated STEM curricula in schools due to the lack of teachers’ experience have also been reported in the literature (e.g., Hamad et al., 2022 ). Several studies (Aydeniz & Bilican, 2018 ; Dong et al., 2019 ) investigated the relationship among different variables and engagement. However, few empirical evidence exists on what predicts pre-service teachers’ engagement in STEM education programs.

Furthermore, there is a paucity of research that focuses on the factors that influence pre-service teachers’ engagement in learning AI. As AI is considered a STEM-related concept, this study aims to fill this gap by investigating the factors influencing pre-service teachers’ engagement in learning AI. Understanding these factors will provide valuable insights into how to effectively prepare pre-service teachers to integrate AI into their teaching practices. This study will also contribute to developing strategies and interventions to enhance pre-service teachers’ learning experiences in AI. In addition, findings from this study will have practical implications for teacher education programs and curriculum development. By identifying the specific factors such as attitude towards AI, anxiety towards AI, AI readiness, self-transcendent goals, and confidence in learning AI that influence pre-service teachers’ engagement in learning AI, pre-service teachers can tailor their pedagogical approach to meet their students’ needs and interests better. Ultimately, the goal is to equip pre-service teachers with the necessary knowledge and skills to integrate AI effectively into their classrooms, ensuring they are prepared adequately for the ever-evolving technological landscape of education.

Extensive research indicates the importance of engagement in learning (Fredricks et al., 2004 ; Tarantino et al., 2013 ). Student engagement has also been referred to as a crucial means of fostering and enhancing student learning (Renninger & Bachrach, 2015 ; Sanusi et al., 2023 ). Engagement is characterized by the behavioral intensity and emotional quality of a person’s active involvement in a task (Sun et al., 2019 ). Without engagement, meaningful learning remains elusive (Kim et al., 2015 ) and cannot accurately determine the extent to which a person has grasped a concept. Within the context of teacher education, particularly in STEM-related programs, we have identified literature that emphasizes the significance of engagement in promoting increased learning (Lange et al., 2022 ; Ryu et al., 2019 ). Previous research (e.g., Grimble, 2019 ; McClure et al., 2017 ) suggests that pre-service teachers’ engagement with learning materials fosters a deep mastery of the subject matter and effective pedagogical practices that can stimulate their students' interest in STEM.

Teacher education programs can equip pre-service teachers with the skills and knowledge necessary to cultivate STEM literacy in the next generation by immersing them in hands-on experiences, encouraging them to explore real-world applications, and supporting collaborative learning (Suryadi et al., 2023 ). In this way, pre-service teachers become more than just conveyors of information; they also foster curiosity, problem-solving, and innovation in their classrooms, cultivating a lifelong interest in STEM disciplines. Moreover, integrating STEM courses into teacher education programs helps pre-service teachers develop a growth mindset and adaptability (Griful-Freixenet et al., 2021 ; Jones et al., 2017 ; Rowston et al., 2020 ), both of which are necessary for navigating the ever-changing landscape of science and technology. Pre-service teachers’ engagement and learning of STEM subjects in teacher education programs are vital for their future performance in the classroom (Berisha & Vula, 2021; Bosica et al., 2021 ). These programs should emphasize acquiring topic knowledge and developing teaching practices that encourage students’ active participation. By implementing active participation in STEM education programs, pre-service teachers better understand STEM concepts and learn how to create dynamic and interactive learning environments (Billington, 2023 ; Yllana-Prieto et al., 2023 ). Exposure to various teaching methods (Bin Abdulrahman et al., 2021 ) and the integration of technology provide students with the necessary capabilities to meet the evolving needs of STEM education. Similarly, encouraging pre-service teachers’ engagement in STEM courses goes beyond the transfer of knowledge (Huang et al., 2022 ; Manasia et al., 2020 ). It instills a passion for these disciplines, inspires them to develop a growth mindset, and cultivates lifelong learners.

Berisha and Vula (2021) stated that the engagement and learning of pre-service teachers in STEM subjects are crucial for their professional development and the success of their future students. Teacher education programs strive to equip pre-service teachers with the knowledge and skills to effectively teach STEM subjects to their future students (Yang & Ball, 2022). It is important to foster their curiosity and enhance their problem-solving abilities. By actively engaging in STEM learning during these programs, educators become well-prepared to inspire the future of innovation and scientific discovery, ensuring a brighter future for STEM education. Encouraging pre-service teachers’ interest in and learning of STEM courses helps build their confidence and competence in making these subjects accessible and enjoyable for their future students. As pre-service teachers become more adept in using STEM teaching methods, they are better equipped to address the challenges and misconceptions that often discourage students from pursuing STEM careers (Akaygun & Aslan-Tutak, 2020; Çinar et al., 2016; Delello, 2014). Ultimately, the success of STEM teacher education programs hinges on their ability to instill a genuine passion for these subjects in pre-service teachers, while providing them with the knowledge and skills to inspire the next generation of problem-solvers, critical thinkers, and innovators.

Theoretical Background

This study is based on the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 2020 ) and incorporates other relevant constructs. In the field of AI education, this theory has primarily been used to examine the intentions of various stakeholders in terms of learning (Chai et al., 2020a , 2020b ; Sing et al., 2022 ) or teaching AI (Ayanwale & Sanusi, 2023; Ayanwale et al., 2022 ). These constructs have previously been used as predictors of behavioral intention. However, we have not found any studies that specifically utilize these constructs as predictors of engagement in the context of AI education, particularly in teacher education programs. Nonetheless, we briefly mention some instances where the variables examined in this study are related to engagement in similar fields.

Attitude Towards AI

In STEM programs, attitudes towards AI education play a crucial role in determining pre-service teachers’ readiness for the evolving educational landscape. A positive attitude towards AI encourages acceptance of its value as a tool to enhance STEM instruction (Papadakis et al., 2021 ), while negative attitudes can lead to resistance and limited adoption (Balakrishnan et al., 2021 ). Pre-service teachers must develop an open-minded attitude towards AI, enabling them to leverage its potential for personalized learning and innovative teaching. This will also ensure that AI becomes a valuable tool in their future STEM classrooms. The engagement of pre-service teachers in AI education is grounded in educational theories and pedagogical principles (Celik, 2023 ). Constructivist theories emphasize the significance of active engagement, collaboration, and hands-on experiences in learning (Kaufman, 1996 ). AI education for pre-service teachers aligns with these theories, advocating for immersive and experiential learning opportunities. Furthermore, the literature (Celik, 2023 ; Shelman, 1987; Yau et al., 2023 ) draws upon the principles of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), suggesting that effective AI education involves the integration of technological knowledge, pedagogical skills, and subject matter expertise. Theoretical perspectives often emphasize the importance of pre-service teachers developing a positive attitude (Opesemowo et al., 2022 ) and a deep understanding of AI concepts and their applications in educational settings. However, studies (Al Darayseh, 2023 ; Kelly et al., 2023 ; Zhang et al., 2023 ) have demonstrated that attitude is a critical factor that influences teachers’ acceptance or rejection of the use of AI. Some individuals hold a positive attitude towards AI technologies and recognize their potential, even if they do not fully comprehend the essence of these technologies (Yadrovskaia et al., 2023 ). Kaya et al. ( 2024 ) observed that personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographics significantly shape attitudes towards AI. The use of AI in the STEM context is an ongoing topic of public discourse, and there is a need for reliable measures to assess pre-service teachers' attitudes towards AI in STEM programs.

Anxiety Towards AI

Anxiety towards AI refers to the fear of using computers or technophobia, which is a term used to describe fear or aversion towards technology in general (Li & Huang, 2020 ; Wang & Wang, 2022 ). Various perspectives on anxiety towards AI and pre-service teachers’ education in STEM programs have been proposed. Some argue that anxiety towards AI stems from a lack of understanding and fear of the unknown (Hopcan et al., 2023 ; Zhan et al., 2023 ). They suggest that pre-service teachers can better understand and overcome their anxiety by receiving comprehensive education in AI technologies. Others believe that anxiety towards AI among pre-service teachers is justified because they feel threatened by AI advancements’ potential job market implications. Anxiety towards AI education in STEM programs can hinder pre-service teachers’ acceptance of technology-driven teaching techniques. This apprehension may stem from concerns about their technological skills or anxieties that AI may replace traditional instructional responsibilities. Pre-service instructors can build confidence in AI tools by addressing these concerns through training and assistance (Jones et al., 2017 ). It is crucial to foster an environment that encourages experimentation while highlighting the complementary role of AI in improving STEM education, reducing anxiety, and promoting its beneficial integration. Kaya et al. ( 2024 ) noted that anxiety about learning AI significantly predicted positive and negative attitudes towards AI. According to Terzi ( 2020 ) and Wang and Wang ( 2022 ), anxiety about learning AI is the fear of being unable to acquire specific knowledge and skills about AI. Several studies have been conducted on anxiety towards AI, but few or none has explored the engagement of pre-service teachers, as used in this study. The relationship between anxiety towards AI and pre-service teachers’ engagement with AI in STEM education is a crucial aspect that requires exploration. Pre-service teachers who experience anxiety towards AI may be less likely to embrace AI tools in their teaching practices (Chocarro et al., 2023 ; Wang et al., 2021). Therefore, we propose that anxiety towards AI can inversely affect student engagement in the AI program.

AI Readiness

AI readiness refers to the preparedness of pre-service teachers, individuals, organizations, and countries to adopt and utilize AI technologies effectively. It can be seen as the eagerness to use AI technological innovations (Garg & Kumar, 2017 ). The AI readiness of pre-service teachers in STEM programs demonstrates their willingness to use AI as an instructional resource. AI readiness entails technical proficiency and a proactive attitude towards incorporating AI technologies into instruction. It necessitates knowledge of AI-driven systems and a dedication to remaining current on AI breakthroughs. Educators who are well-prepared for the AI-infused future can exploit AI’s potential (Hsu et al., 2019 ) to improve STEM instruction, adapt to changing educational demands, and give students creative and individualized learning experiences. Several studies have explored AI readiness in different contexts. Xuan et al. ( 2023 ) conducted a survey to evaluate medical AI readiness among undergraduate medical students and found that most participants had moderate readiness. Palade and Carutasu ( 2021 ) emphasized the need for organizations to adopt AI technologies to keep up with innovation. They suggested that AI readiness adoption can be normalized under an existing model for digitization. Baguma et al. ( 2023 ) proposed an AI readiness index specifically tailored to the needs of African countries, highlighting dimensions such as vision, governance and ethics, digital capacity, and research and development. Taskiran ( 2023 ) reported that an AI course in the nursing curriculum positively affected students’ readiness for medical AI. These studies highlight the importance of assessing and enhancing AI readiness in various domains and contexts. Still, a drought of studies focused on the AI readiness of pre-service teachers to engage with STEM programs.

Self-transcendent Goals

Self-transcendent goals involve looking beyond oneself and adopting a larger perspective, including concern for others (Ge & Yang, 2023 ). Self-transcendence is a multifaceted psychological phenomenon that includes acts of kindness, philanthropy, and community service as individuals strive to go beyond their individual needs and desires to make a positive impact on the lives of others. It has been shown that self-transcendence is linked to mental health and nursing (Haugan et al., 2013 ; Nygren et al., 2005 ), spirituality (Bovero et al., 2023 ; Suliman et al., 2022 ), and performance in learning and motivation (Reeves et al., 2021 ; Yeager et al., 2014 ), social activism (Barton & Hart, 2023 ) among other fields. The self-transcendent aspirations of pre-service teachers in STEM programs encompass their desire to go beyond personal accomplishments (Naftzger, 2018 ) and contribute more significantly to the welfare of society through STEM education. These objectives frequently include instilling a love of STEM in their pupils, promoting diversity and inclusivity, and addressing real-world issues through STEM education (Okundaye et al., 2022 ). Embracing self-transcendent aspirations inspires pre-service teachers to consistently enhance their STEM topic knowledge, pedagogical abilities, and empathy, driving them to become inspirational educators who inspire future generations to engage profoundly with STEM and promote positive social change. With self-transcendence, pre-service teachers are motivated to continuously adapt and evolve their teaching practices, seeking innovative ways to integrate AI tools and resources into their lessons. By embracing the new trend of teaching and learning AI, pre-service teachers are preparing their students for the future and actively shaping the future of education. To the best of our knowledge, few studies (Ge & Yang, 2023 ; Sanusi et al., 2024a , 2024b ; Yeager et al., 2014 ) have been conducted to examine whether pre-service teachers with a self-transcendent goal for engaging AI are more motivated to learn AI.

Confidence in Learning AI

Pre-service teachers’ confidence in learning AI is a significant component of their readiness to integrate AI into STEM education (Roy et al., 2022 ). Confidence here refers to their belief in their ability to effectively learn AI-related knowledge and skills (Lin et al., 2023 ). When pre-service teachers feel confident in their ability to master AI, they are more likely to participate in AI-related professional development, investigate AI applications in their teaching practices, and adapt to the changing educational landscape. Building this confidence through professional development training is critical for equipping pre-service teachers to use AI as a beneficial resource for improving STEM instruction and preparing students for an AI-driven future. This study attempts to validate existing research (Sanusi et al., 2024a , 2024b ) by investigating whether confidence in learning AI influences student engagement in an AI program.

Engagement in AI Learning

Engagement sparks curiosity and motivates individuals to actively participate in and absorb new information. When learners are engaged, they are more likely to ask questions, seek additional resources, and apply the material to their own experiences. According to Martin ( 2012 ), motivation is the basis of engagement, so AI can be used as a tool to engage pre-service teachers in integrated STEM learning and teaching (Kim et al., 2015 ). Exploring engagement in AI learning is essential, as it establishes a relationship between engagement and learning. Since there are indications that students engaged in learning activities benefit from increased learning, it is imperative to explore this relationship. This investigation is crucial because AI learning is a new initiative, and strategies must be examined to effectively communicate the concepts to students and teachers. Based on the description by Fredricks et al. ( 2004 ), engagement is a multidimensional construct that encompasses behavior, emotion, and cognition. We will briefly describe each engagement type (in relation to AI learning) highlighted below.

Cognitive Engagement—Critical Thinking: Cognitive (Looking at the Focused Effort Students Give to What Is Being Taught)

Learning and mastering artificial intelligence (AI) require critical thinking (Benvenuti et al., 2023 ), particularly in cognitive engagement. The CE details how students process information (Schnitzler et al., 2021 ). AI requires deep cognitive engagement from learners because of its complex algorithms (Jaiswal & Arun, 2021 ), diverse applications, and ethical implications. Critical thinking in this context involves analyzing data sources for potential biases, evaluating the ethical implications of AI decisions, and challenging the assumptions that underpin AI decisions. Additionally, it requires learners to explore and evaluate different approaches and methods to solve real-world problems using AI techniques. Developing critical thinking skills with cognitive engagement helps individuals understand AI concepts and provides them with the tools to innovate effectively and navigate the rapidly changing AI landscape. In addition, cognitive engagement through critical thinking catalyzes innovation in the fast-expanding field of AI. Cognitive engagement and critical thinking are important aspects of pre-service teachers’ engagement in STEM education. Research has shown that active engagement in STEM education leads to higher-order thinking skills, increased motivation, and improved learning outcomes (Kamarrudin et al., 2023 ). In STEM education, pre-service teachers employ cognitive engagement via critical thinking skills to successfully teach STEM and achieve meaningful learning experiences for their students (HacioĞLu, 2021 ). Recently, Yıldız-Feyzioğlu and Kıran ( 2022 ) showed that collaborative group investigation (CGI) learning and self-efficacy have also been found to positively impact the critical thinking skills of pre-service science teachers. Therefore, cognitive engagement and critical thinking play a crucial role in pre-service teachers’ engagement in STEM education, leading to improved learning outcomes and the development of effective instructional strategies.

Cognitive Engagement—Creativity

Cognitive engagement via creativity is a dynamic and necessary part of learning AI. While AI is founded on mathematical and computational concepts, encouraging creativity in AI education is crucial for several reasons (Lin et al., 2023 ). Creativity enables students to conceive unique AI applications, leading to novel healthcare, economics, and entertainment solutions. Cognitive engagement for pre-service teachers in STEM education involves their continuous intellectual involvement, the design of stimulating instructional strategies, effective use of technology, and the promotion of a growth mindset (Kim et al., 2015 ). These cognitive aspects contribute to a dynamic and enriching STEM learning experience, preparing students to think critically, adapt to new challenges, and thrive in a knowledge-based society. Patar ( 2023 ) reveals that active engagement activities, such as exploration, sharing knowledge, and assessment, can enhance pre-service teachers’ cognitive engagement. Pre-service teachers should champion the integration of digital tools and resources to enhance the learning experience, providing students with opportunities to explore, experiment, and apply their cognitive skills in a technology-driven world. This integration also supports the development of digital literacy skills, which is essential for successful STEM disciplines. Whether cognitive engagement through creative thinking will significantly affect pre-service teachers in STEM education remains to be investigated.

Behavioral Engagement—Self-directed Learning: Behavioral (Measuring Attendance and Participation)

Behavior engagement refers to measuring academic performance and participation in educational activities (Bowden et al., 2021 ). It is critical to understand the discipline of AI, particularly in the context of self-directed learning (Nazari et al., 2021 ). Pre-service teachers must consider behavioral engagement as an important aspect of STEM education. When pre-service teachers actively engage students in hands-on activities, discussions, and problem-solving tasks, students are more likely to understand STEM concepts better. However, taking the initiative indicates a high level of behavioral engagement (Kim et al., 2015 ). STEM education differs from conventional teaching, which treats students as passive listeners. To implement STEM innovations in the classroom, teachers must design inquiry activities and learning contexts to engage students in authentic problem-solving (Dong et al., 2019 ). Kim et al. ( 2015 ) found that using technology (robotics) significantly impacted students’ behavioral engagement. Thus, this study supports behavioral engagement in STEM education for pre-service teachers.

Social Engagement

Social interaction can be referred to as social interaction, which is an essential component of learning (Okita, 2012 ). It entails working with peers, experts, and AI communities to exchange ideas, share knowledge, and get diverse viewpoints, ultimately improving the learning experience and driving creativity. Social engagement for pre-service teachers in STEM education involves building positive relationships within the school community, integrating collaborative learning experiences, actively participating in professional networks, and instilling a sense of social responsibility in students. These social aspects contribute to a holistic STEM education experience, fostering a collaborative and purpose-driven approach that prepares students for success in both academic and real-world STEM contexts. Ishmuradova et al. ( 2023 ) reported that pre-service science teachers have shown high awareness of social responsibility in human welfare, safety, and a sustainable environment. However, their awareness related to practice and participation is relatively low. To our knowledge, there is apparently no study on social engagement among pre-service teachers in STEM education.

Research Hypotheses

H1: Attitude towards AI will significantly positively influence student engagement in the AI program.

H2: Anxiety towards AI will significantly negatively influence student engagement in the AI program.

H3: AI readiness will significantly positively influence student engagement in the AI program.

H4: Self-transcendent goals will significantly positively influence student engagement in the AI program.

H5: Confidence in learning AI will significantly positively influence student engagement in the AI program.

Methodology

Research context and participants.

This study was conducted at a public university of education in Ghana, specifically focusing on the students enrolled in the Information Communication and Technology (ICT) Education program. It is important to note that the student teachers had not completed any courses in AI. As shown in Table  1 , 35 pre-service teachers participated in our research, with a majority being male and aged between 19 and 25 years. Most of the participants (57.1%) were in their second year of the teacher training program. For this research, we utilized a simple random sampling approach. We extended an invitation to all the students in the ICT department to participate in our study, and their involvement was based on informed consent. We also assured the participants of their anonymity and the ability to withdraw from the project at any time.

Data Collection Procedure

The data utilized for this study was gathered through an online survey shortly after a 4-week AI short course program organized between September and October 2022. The course was designed to expose pre-service teachers to AI knowledge and its ethical implications. The program is designed as an intervention of 2 h 30 min weekly, including assignments, and comprises four different learning sessions and five different topics. The topics include Introduction to AI and Ethical Dilemmas, Image Recognition, Algorithms and Bias, Convolution Neural Networks, k-Nearest Neighbor, and Decision Trees. We used different plugged and unplugged activities to demystify the topics to the study participants (Ma et al., 2023 ). We used AI tools like Google Teachable Machine (plugged activities) during the learning session, including a series of paper-based activities (unplugged) that support collaborative learning (Frimpong, Sanusi, Ayanwale, et al., n.d) After the sessions, the pre-service teachers filled out a survey to gather their perspectives about their learning.

Instrumentation

Our research instrument was adapted from different sources in the research literature (see “Appendix”). We modified some terms slightly to fit our research context. We adapted the items for engagement from the studies of Bowden et al. ( 2021 ), Reeve and Tseng ( 2011 ), and Sun et al. ( 2019 ). Confidence in learning AI scale was adapted from Xia et al. ( 2022 ). Finally, the scales for attitude towards AI, anxiety towards AI, AI readiness, and self-transcendent goals were derived from the study of Sanusi et al. ( 2023 ). A 6-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” was used to retrieve all the items’ responses. We decided to use a 6-point Likert scale since it provides opportunities for more choice and may measure the participants’ evaluation more accurately (Taherdoost, 2019 ).

Analytical Approach

In this study, we employed a variance-based structural equation modeling (VB-SEM) approach to assess our proposed model. This methodology allowed us to estimate both the measurement and structural models simultaneously. We chose VB-SEM over covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) due to its suitability for our study’s specific characteristics. These include dealing with small sample sizes, not having strict distribution requirements for the data, explaining variance, and managing a complex hierarchical component model. This complexity is evident in our study, which focuses on student engagement in the AI program (Benitez et al., 2020 ; Hair et al., 2014 ). To conduct our data analysis, we utilized SmartPLS software version 4.0.9.6 (Ringle et al., 2022 ). More so, various parameters were considered when estimating our model in partial least squares (PLS), including the use of the path weighting scheme as the estimation method, raw data for data metric, and default settings of the initial weight PLS-SEM algorithm (Hair et al., 2017 ). To validate our model, we employed the two-stage disjoint approach for higher-order constructs (Sarstedt et al., 2019 ) since the variable “engagement” is indeed a higher-order construct consisting of four lower-order constructs: cognitive engagement—critical thinking (CECT), cognitive engagement—creativity (CEC), behavioral engagement—self-directed learning (BESL), and social engagement (SOE).

In addition, our analysis process involved assessing the goodness of model fit for the measurement model, which was based on the saturated model, and for the structural model, which was based on the estimated model. We evaluated these models using various parameters, including the standardized residual mean square root (SRMR) and other fit indices like normed fit index (NFI), the distance of unweighted least squares (d ULS ), and the geodesic distance (d G ) to ensure adequate model fit (Benitez et al., 2020 ; Hair et al., 2017 ). In the evaluation of the measurement model, both first- and second-order constructs were examined for reliability and validity, looking at factors such as item factor loadings (FL ≥ 0.60), construct reliability (i.e., Cronbach alpha and composite reliability indices—CA ≥ 0.70; CR ≥ 0.70), convergent validity (average variance extracted—AVE ≥ 0.5), and discriminant validity (i.e., heterotrait-monotrait correlation—HTMT < 0.85 or HTMT < 0.90) (Ayanwale & Ndlovu, 2024 ; Hair et al., 2017, 2019, 2022; Henseler et al., 2015 ; Ringle et al., 2023 ; Sarstedt et al., 2019 ). Items with factor loadings below 0.60 and constructs with average variance extracted (AVE) below 0.50 were removed, and the models were subsequently refined. To test the hypotheses proposed in our study, we analyzed the relationships between constructs in the structural model using bootstrapping with 10,000 subsamples in PLS. We assessed the magnitude and statistical significance of direct effects to understand the relative importance of constructs in explaining others in the structural model (Amusa & Ayanwale, 2021 ; Hair et al., 2018 ; Hock et al., 2010 ; Ringle & Sarstedt, 2016 ). We also estimated the predictive power within the sample using the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), which should exceed 0.1 ( R 2  > 0.1), and the predictive power outside the sample through the PLSpredict ( Q 2 predict ) obtained by comparing the RMSE (root mean square error) or MAE (mean absolute error) values of all the indicators in the PLS-SEM analysis to those of the LM (linear model) benchmark. When most of these indicators yield lower RMSE or MAE values than the LM benchmark, it demonstrates a moderate level of predictive power. On the other hand, if only a minority of the indicators exhibit lower prediction errors compared to the LM benchmark, the model’s predictive capability is low. If none of the indicators shows lower prediction errors than the LM benchmark, the model lacks predictive power (Sanusi et al., 2023 ; Shmueli & Koppius, 2011 ; Shmueli et al., 2019 ).

This section presents the results of the analysis. Thus, Table  2 evaluates the overall model fit for the measurement and structural models. This analysis indicates that the SRMR value falls below the recommended threshold (SRMR < 0.08), and the SRMR, NFI, d ULS , and d G values are all below the 95% quantile (HI95) of their reference distribution. These findings collectively suggest that the measurement model demonstrates an acceptable fit, and there is empirical evidence supporting the validity of the estimated model (Molefi & Ayanwale, 2023 ; Quintana & Maxwell, 1999 ).

In the measurement model, we conducted an evaluation of reliability and validity for both the lower-order constructs (LOC) and higher-order constructs (HOC). The results, as depicted in Table  3 , indicate that the factor loadings for LOC range from 0.648 to 0.975, composite reliability (CR) values for LOC range from 0.826 to 0.980, Cronbach’s alpha (α) values for LOC range from 0.783 to 0.962, and average variance extracted (AVE) values for LOC range from 0.541 to 0.923. Furthermore, the factor loadings for HOC range from 0.784 to 0.846, with a CR value for HOC of 0.888, a Cronbach’s α value for HOC of 0.834, and an AVE value for HOC of 0.664.

Significantly, all these values surpass the recommended thresholds, signifying that the lower-order and higher-order constructs exhibit strong validity, reliability, and internal consistency. Additionally, we confirmed discriminant validity, as indicated in Table  4 , demonstrating that each reflective construct shows more robust associations with its indicators than any other construct within the PLS path model. In other words, the constructs are distinguishable from one another, with correlation values well below the suggested threshold. This underscores the effectiveness of the measurement model in establishing good discriminant validity (Ayanwale & Oladele, 2021 ; Hair et al., 2022 ).

The findings from the structural model are illustrated in Table  4 and Fig.  2 . Following the results, attitude towards AI has a significant positive effect on student engagement in the AI program ( β  = 0.262, t  = 3.814, p  < 0.05), supporting H1. Anxiety towards AI is found to exert a negative influence on student engagement in the AI program ( β  =  − 0.257, t  =  − 3.438, p  < 0.05), validating H2. AI readiness positively influences student engagement in the AI program ( β  = 0.265, t  = 4.420, p  < 0.05), so H3 is supported. Self-transcendent goals positively impact student engagement in the AI program (β = 0.232, t = 4.171, p < 0.05), thus supporting H4. At the same time, confidence in learning AI is positively associated with student engagement in the AI program ( β  = 0.386, t  = 6.037, p  < 0.05), supporting H5. Attitude towards AI, anxiety towards AI, AI readiness, self-transcendent goals, and confidence in learning AI jointly explain 63.1% of the variance in student engagement in the AI program. Hence, the model’s ability to explain variance within the sample is deemed adequate, as the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) values surpass the threshold of 0.10 (Ayanwale & Molefi, 2024 ; Falk & Miller, 1992 ; Molefi & Ayanwale, 2023 ).

Structural model result

In addition, the effect size ( f 2 ) was calculated to assess how much removing each exogenous variable from the model influences the model’s ability to explain variance. The f 2 values were interpreted according to Cohen ( 1988 )’s guidelines, which classify effect sizes as small ( f 2  >  = 0.02), medium ( f 2  ≥ 0.15), or large ( f 2  ≥ 0.35). The effect sizes for the different exogenous variables, as shown in Table  5 , revealed that AT ( f 2  = 0.292) had a substantial effect size. This means that removing variable AT from the model would significantly reduce the model’s ability to explain variance. Therefore, variable AT plays a crucial role in explaining variance in the model, and its inclusion is essential for an accurate model. Variable CL ( f 2  = 0.214) also had a notable effect size, indicating its substantial contribution to the model’s explanatory power. Its removal would significantly diminish the model’s capacity to explain variance. Also, AR ( f 2  = 0.179) had a moderate effect size. Removing variable AR would moderately decrease the model’s ability to explain the variance, underlining its importance in the model, and AN ( f 2  = 0.042) and SG ( f 2  = 0.031) had relatively smaller effect sizes. While these variables contribute to the model’s ability to explain the variance, their removal would have a minor impact on its overall performance. Prioritizing and retaining variables AT and CL are crucial to maintaining the model’s accuracy and explanatory power. Although not as influential as AT and CL, variable AR still plays a moderate role in explaining variance and should be retained in the analysis.

Furthermore, when examining the results of Q 2 predict (see Table  6 ), we noticed that all the metrics associated with the endogenous construct (student engagement in the AI program) exhibited lower values for RMSE (root mean square error) and MAE (mean absolute error) in comparison to a simple linear model benchmark that was based on the means of the indicators from the training sample. These metrics yielded Q 2 predict values that exceeded 0. This suggests that the indicators used in our PLS-SEM analysis produced fewer prediction errors when compared to the linear model benchmark, thereby indicating a strong predictive capability for our model.

While previous research has explored constructs such as AT, CL, AR, AN, and SG and their links to behavioral intention in the context of AI and education (Ayanwale et al., 2022 ; Chai et al., 2021, 2020a, 2020b), this study contributes to the existing literature by investigating how these constructs affect pre-service teacher engagement with AI. The novelty of this research lies in its examination of the relationship between these constructs and the engagement of pre-service teachers, addressing a gap in literature. This paper adopts a holistic approach to measuring pre-service teacher engagement in AI programs, which includes four dimensions: cognitive engagement (critical thinking and creativity), behavioral engagement (self-directed learning), and social engagement. Additionally, composite-based structural equation modeling is employed to unravel the intricate interrelationships among student engagement with AI learning, attitude towards AI, anxiety towards AI, self-transcendent goals, AI readiness, and confidence in learning AI.

The findings affirm the validity of all proposed hypotheses (H1–H5) as antecedents to pre-service teachers’ engagement with AI content. Collectively, these constructs account for 63.1% of the observed variance in teachers’ engagement with AI. Among the predictor variables, confidence in learning AI emerges as the most influential predictor of pre-service teachers’ engagement, followed by AI readiness, attitude towards AI, and self-transcendent goals. These findings resonate with the previous research (e.g., Ayanwale, 2023 ; Lin et al., 2023 ; Papadakis et al., 2021 ; Roy et al., 2022 ). Confidence in one’s ability to learn AI and use technology has been a recurring theme in technology adoption literature. Bandura’s theory (1977) underscores the significance of self-efficacy in adopting and effectively using new technologies. Thus, confidence in learning AI plays a pivotal role in driving engagement with AI activities. These findings align with Chen et al. ( 2018 ), which found that undergraduate students’ confidence in their ability to grasp AI significantly predicted their intention to learn AI. Consistent with our findings, Sun et al. ( 2019 ) asserted that confidence, as one of the intrinsic motivation components, significantly predicts students’ engagement in MOOC courses. When students perceive learning in MOOCs as enjoyable and are confident in their abilities, they are more motivated and engaged in their studies. Therefore, it is imperative to prioritize building confidence in pre-service teachers concerning their capacity to learn AI and to create supportive learning environments and practical training to enhance their engagement in AI programs.

As the second most influential variable, AI readiness has been identified as critical in enhancing student engagement in learning AI (Tang & Chen, 2018 ). While existing studies have primarily explored the relationship between AI readiness and intention (Ayanwale et al., 2022 ; Chai et al., 2020a , 2020b ), this study delves into how individuals’ preparedness and willingness to engage with and adapt to AI influence engagement with AI learning materials. It examines whether their comfort level with AI technology contributes to their active involvement in AI-related educational programs, including attendance, coursework engagement, and participation in AI-related projects (Dai et al., 2020 ; Hsu et al., 2019 ; Sun et al., 2019 ). The positive coefficient uncovered in our findings indicates that higher AI readiness positively correlates with increased engagement in learning AI. This suggests that pre-service teachers are more likely to engage in AI-related activities when they feel prepared and willing to embrace AI. Therefore, it emphasizes the importance of adequately preparing pre-service teachers to work with AI. AI readiness is critical in teacher training to enhance engagement and effectiveness in AI education.

In addition, previous research (Ayanwale et al., 2022 ; Kumar & Mantri, 2021 ; Weng et al., 2018 ) has consistently highlighted the significance of one’s attitude in predicting the intention to learn AI. Our study also observes a substantial positive relationship between a positive attitude towards AI and pre-service teacher engagement with AI. This finding aligns with the work of Papadakis et al. ( 2021 ), emphasizing that a positive attitude towards AI promotes its acceptance as a valuable tool for enhancing STEM instruction and increasing engagement. It further corroborates the findings of Kim and Park ( 2019 ), who reported that individuals with more positive attitudes towards AI were more likely to plan the use of AI-based technologies. Ayanwale ( 2023 ) and Ng and Chu ( 2021 ) also underscore the importance of a positive attitude, as students with such an attitude were more inclined to learn AI. Our results indicate that pre-service teachers are more likely to actively participate in AI-related educational activities when they view AI more favorably. This underscores the critical role of instilling positive attitudes and perceptions about AI in teacher training programs, urging educators and institutions to prioritize this aspect to enhance engagement with AI-related content.

We also examine the impact of self-transcendent goals, encompassing objectives beyond personal well-being. Our results reveal a significant positive coefficient, indicating that having self-transcendent goals positively correlates with pre-service teacher engagement in learning AI. This outcome aligns with the findings of Naftzger ( 2018 ) and Okundaye et al. ( 2022 ), who found that pre-service teachers in STEM programs often harbor aspirations to make a broader societal impact, transcending personal accomplishments. In practical terms, their engagement increases when teachers are motivated by goals benefiting their students, including the society. Therefore, emphasizing self-transcendent goals in pre-service teachers may enhance their commitment to AI-related education and its potential impact on students.

In addition to previous studies that explore the relationship between anxiety and intention (Ayanwale et al., 2022 ; Chai et al., 2020a , b ), our study delves into how self-perceived fear and discomfort concerning AI tools affect engagement in AI programs. The results support our hypothesis, showing a negative coefficient, indicating that anxiety towards AI is negatively associated with pre-service teacher engagement in learning AI. This finding resonates with the work of Katsarou (2021) and Kin (2020), which also found a significant negative relationship between anxiety and intention regarding AI. Jones et al. ( 2017 ) also note that apprehension might arise from concerns about technological skills or fears that AI might replace traditional instructional roles. To address this anxiety, pre-service instructors can build confidence in AI tools through training and support. Creating an environment that encourages experimentation and emphasizes AI’s complementary role in improving STEM education is crucial. Reducing anxiety and promoting AI’s beneficial integration is essential for encouraging engagement. While some scholars find anxiety less predictive of behavioral intention, our study suggests that anxiety towards AI significantly impacts pre-service teacher engagement with learning AI. This insight underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing AI-related anxiety among pre-service teachers. It highlights the need for strategies to reduce anxiety and enhance comfort with AI to promote engagement in AI education programs. Notably, while our study specifically targets pre-service teachers, we recognize the importance of exploring how these findings could be replicated across various academic disciplines. By discussing the relevance of our results to broader educational contexts, we provide insights into potential variations that might arise in different settings. This discussion facilitates a more comprehensive understanding of the generalizability and applicability of our findings.

Implication for Practice and Policy

Understanding the factors influencing pre-service teachers’ engagement with AI has significant implications for both educational practices and policy development. Based on this study’s findings, we recommend that educational institutions and policymakers prioritize integrating AI-related content within pre-service teacher education programs. This integration will facilitate the development of essential AI literacy and skills, equipping teachers to incorporate AI technologies into their teaching methods effectively. To ensure a well-rounded and practical approach, schools should offer opportunities for teachers to engage in ongoing professional development focused on AI. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of exposing pre-service teachers to various AI-powered teaching tools and methodologies. This exposure will empower them to create more engaging and personalized learning experiences for their students. Consequently, policies should encourage the adoption of AI tools that can cater to the unique needs of each student, fostering more inclusive and accommodating learning environments.

Furthermore, pre-service teachers must comprehend the ethical implications associated with AI technologies. They should be well-prepared to guide their students in the responsible utilization of AI. Policymakers can contribute by allocating school resources to acquire AI technologies and providing teachers with the necessary tools and training. This includes investments in AI software, hardware, and technical support to ensure teachers can effectively integrate AI into their classrooms. Robust policies should be established to safeguard student data when employing AI tools. Pre-service teachers should be well-versed in data privacy and security measures and adhere to regulations when incorporating AI technologies into their teaching practices.

Promoting cross-disciplinary learning that incorporates AI concepts is also crucial. Pre-service teachers should be primed to teach AI not only as a standalone subject but also as a complementary tool in various disciplines. Policies can foster collaboration among pre-service teachers, experienced educators, and AI experts. Such interactions can yield valuable insights and drive innovation in AI education. Encouraging pre-service teachers to engage in action research to assess the impact of AI on student learning and their teaching practices can be pivotal. This research can inform best practices and contribute to a growing knowledge of AI in education. On the policy front, both policymakers and educators should strive to ensure that AI resources and training are accessible to all, regardless of a student’s socioeconomic background or geographical location. This may entail initiatives aimed at bridging the digital divide and promoting equitable access to AI education. The policy framework should also account for ongoing support and professional development for teachers as AI technologies evolve. Teachers must possess the skills to adapt to changes and stay current with developments in AI in education. Also, our study offers practical recommendations for practitioners. Emphasizing the critical role of building confidence in pre-service teachers, enhancing AI readiness in teacher training, fostering positive attitudes towards AI, and incorporating self-transcendent goals, we provide actionable steps for educators and institutions. These recommendations offer a roadmap for creating supportive learning environments and practical training to enhance pre-service teacher engagement in AI programs.

Limitation and Future Work

Some limitations should be noted despite the valuable results this study generates. First, the selection of study participants is restricted to the ICT education department at a university in Ghana. Hence, it is necessary to consider subjects across different disciplines within the teacher education program as well as other regions to understand students’ engagement from a broader perspective. Second, our sample size may limit the generalizability of our results. Future research should consider a relatively large sample size across different contexts. Third, using only a quantitative approach limits the insight we may generate from students’ explanations during the learning process. To this end, a qualitative or mixed-method approach should be considered for triangulation purposes. Lastly, the AI program in this study spans over a few weeks. Future research should investigate student engagement across an academic session and a longitudinal study of the candidates.

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2 (4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Article   Google Scholar  

Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4 , 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132

Amusa, J. O., & Ayanwale, M. A. (2021). Partial least square modeling of personality traits and academic achievement in physics. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11 (2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.2.8.2021

Ayanwale, M. A. (2023). Evidence from Lesotho secondary schools on students’ intention to engage in artificial intelligence learning. In 2023 IEEE AFRICON , Nairobi, Kenya, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRICON55910.2023.10293644

Ayanwale, M. A., & Molefi, R. R. (2024). Exploring intention of undergraduate students to embrace chatbots: From the vantage point of Lesotho. International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education, 21 , 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00451-8

Ayanwale, M. A., Molefi, R. R., & Matsie, N. (2023). Modeling secondary school students’ attitudes toward TVET subjects using social cognitive and planned behavior theories. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8 (1), 100478.

Ayanwale, M. A., & Ndlovu, M. (2024). Investigating factors of students’ behavioral intentions to adopt chatbot technologies in higher education: Perspective from expanded diffusion theory of innovation. Computers in Human Behavior Report, 14 , 100396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100396

Ayanwale, M. A., & Oladele, J. I. (2021). Path modeling of online learning indicators and students’ satisfaction during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change , 15 (10), 521–541. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_15/Iss_10/151038_Ayanwale_2021_E1_R.pdf . Accessed 19 Oct 2023.

Ayanwale, M. A., & Sanusi, I. T. (2023). Perceptions of STEM vs. Non-STEM teachers toward teaching artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Africa Conference , Kenya, 16 , 933–937.  https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRICON55910.2023.10293455

Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3 , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099

Aydeniz, M., & Bilican, K. (2018). The impact of engagement in STEM activities on primary pre-service teachers’ conceptualization of STEM and knowledge of STEM pedagogy. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 4 (2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2018.46

Baguma, R., Mkoba, E., Nahabwe, M., Mubangizi, M. G., Amutorine, M., & Wanyama, D. (2023). Towards an artificial intelligence readiness index for Africa. In P. Ndayizigamiye, H. Twinomurinzi, B. Kalema, K. Bwalya, & M. Bembe, Digital-for-development: Enabling transformation, inclusion and sustainability through ICTs Cham, 23 (4), 234–258 .  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28472-4_18

Balakrishnan, J., Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., & Boy, F. (2021). Enablers and inhibitors of AI-powered voice assistants: A dual-factor approach by integrating the status quo bias and technology acceptance model. Information Systems Frontiers . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10203-y

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Barton, C., & Hart, R. (2023). The experience of self-transcendence in social activists. Behavioral Sciences, 13 (1), 66. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/13/1/66 . Accessed 13 Sept 2023.

Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57 (2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003

Benvenuti, M., Cangelosi, A., Weinberger, A., Mazzoni, E., Benassi, M., Barbaresi, M., & Orsoni, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence and human behavioral development: A perspective on new skills and competencies acquisition for the educational context. Computers in Human Behavior, 148 , 107903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107903

Billington, B. (2023). A case study: Exploring pre-service teachers’ readiness for teaching in K-12 online learning environments while enrolled in a University-based teacher preparation program [Ed.D., Drexel University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. United States -- Pennsylvania. 1–285. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/case-study-exploring-pre-service-teachers/docview/2854683389/se-2?accountid=13425

Bin Abdulrahman, K. A., Jumaa, M. I., Hanafy, S. M., Elkordy, E. A., Arafa, M. A., Ahmad, T., & Rasheed, S. (2021). Students’ perceptions and attitudes after exposure to three different instructional strategies in applied anatomy. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12 , 607–612. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S310147

Bosica, J., Pyper, J. S., & MacGregor, S. (2021). Incorporating problem-based learning in a secondary school mathematics pre-service teacher education course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102 , 103335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103335

Bovero, A., Pesce, S., Botto, R., Tesio, V., & Ghiggia, A. (2023). Self-transcendence: Association with spirituality in an Italian sample of terminal cancer patients. Behavioral Sciences, 13 (7), 559. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/13/7/559 . Accessed 26 Sept 2023.

Bowden, J. L. H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2021). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: A holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46 (6), 1207–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647

Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44 (4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748

Carroll, M., Lindsey, S., Chaparro, M., & Winslow, B. (2021). An applied model of learner engagement and strategies for increasing learner engagement in the modern educational environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 29 (5), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636083

Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10 (1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7

Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138 , 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468

Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 24 (3), 89–101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032858 . Accessed 14 Oct 2023.

Chai, C. S., Lin, P., & Jong, M. S. (2020). Factors influencing students’ behavioral intention to continue artificial intelligence learning. Conference proceedings of International Symposium on Educational Technology, Thailand, 8 , 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00040

Chai, C. S., Wang, X., & Xu, C. (2020b). An extended theory of planned behavior for modeling Chinese secondary school students’ intention to learn artificial intelligence. Mathematics, 8 (11), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112089

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Zou, W. (2018). The impact of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control on high school students’ intentions to study computer science. Education Sciences, 8 (2), 65.

Google Scholar  

Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Marcos-Matás, G. (2023). Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: A technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educational Studies, 49 (2), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Dai, Y., Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Guo, Y., & Qin, J. (2020). Promoting students’ well-being by developing their readiness for the artificial intelligence age. Sustainability, 12 (16), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166597

Dong, Y., Xu, C., Song, X., Fu, Q., Chai, C. S., & Huang, Y. (2019). Exploring the effects of contextual factors on in-service teachers’ engagement in STEM teaching. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28 (1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0407-0

Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling . University of Akron Press.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74 (1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Frimpong, E. K (2022).  Developing pre-service teachers’ artificial intelligence literacy  (Master's thesis, Itä-Suomen yliopisto).

Frimpong, E. K., Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Oyelere, S. S. (n.d) Assessing pre-service teachers’ needs for implementing artificial intelligence in teacher education. Computers in Human Behavior Reports.

Garg, A., & Kumar, J. (2017). Exploring customer satisfaction with university cafeteria food services. An empirical study of Temptation Restaurant at Taylor’s University, Malaysia. European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 8 (2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1515/ejthr-2017-0009

Ge, B. H., & Yang, F. (2023). Transcending the self to transcend suffering. Frontiers in Psychology, 14 , 1113965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1113965

Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., & Vantieghem, W. (2021). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs and practices about two inclusive frameworks: Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107 , 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103503

Grimble, T. (2019). Teacher professional development challenges for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A case study . University of Phoenix.

HacioĞLu, Y. (2021). The effect of STEM education on 21th century skills: Preservice science teachers’ evaluations. Journal of STEAM Education, 4 (2), 140–167.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2a ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31 (1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) . Sage.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, G. V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26 (2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hamad, S., Tairab, H., Wardat, Y., Rabbani, L., AlArabi, K., Yousif, M., . . . Stoica, G. (2022). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM: teacher perceptions and practice. Sustainability, 14 (6), 3594. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3594 . Accessed 23 Sept 2023.

Haugan, G., Hanssen, B., & Moksnes, U. K. (2013). Self-transcendence, nurse–patient interaction and the outcome of multidimensional well-being in cognitively intact nursing home patients. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27 (4), 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12000

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115–135.

Hock, C., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). Management of multi-purpose stadiums: Importance and performance measurement of service interfaces. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 14 (2/3), 188–207.

Hopcan, S., Türkmen, G., & Polat, E. (2023). Exploring the artificial intelligence anxiety and machine learning attitudes of teacher candidates. Education and Information Technologies . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12086-9

Hsu, H.-C.K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24 (3), 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w

Huang, B., Siu-Yung Jong, M., Tu, Y.-F., Hwang, G.-J., Chai, C. S., & Yi-Chao Jiang, M. (2022). Trends and exemplary practices of STEM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 189 , 104577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104577

Ishmuradova, I. I., Sazonova, T. V., Panova, S. A., Andryushchenko, I. S., Mashkin, N. A., & Zakharova, V. L. (2023). Examining pre-service science teachers’ perspectives on the social responsibility of scientists and engineers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19 (8), em315. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13457

Jaiswal, A., & Arun, C. J. (2021). Potential of artificial intelligence for transformation of the education system in India. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 17 (1), 142–158.

Jones, W. M., Smith, S., & Cohen, J. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about using maker activities in formal K-12 educational settings: A multi-institutional study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49 (3–4), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1318097

Kamarrudin, H., Talib, O., Kamarudin, N., & Ismail, N. (2023). Igniting active engagement in pre-service teachers in STEM education: A comprehensive systematic literature review. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8 (6), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i6.2342

Kaufman, D. (1996). Constructivist-based experiential learning in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 18 (2), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1996.10462832

Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O., & Demir Kaya, M. (2024). The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40 (2), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730

Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A Systematic Review. Telematics and Informatics, 77 , 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925

Kim, M., & Park, Y. (2019). The relationship between attitudes toward artificial intelligence and students’ intention to use it in education. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35 (13), 1223–1233.

Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91 , 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005

Kumar, A., & Mantri, A. (2021). Evaluating the attitude towards the intention to use the ARITE system for improving laboratory skills by engineering educators. Education and Information Technologies , 27 , 671–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10420-z

Lange, A. A., Robertson, L., Tian, Q., Nivens, R., & Price, J. (2022). The effects of an early childhood-elementary teacher preparation program in STEM on pre-service teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18 (12), em2197. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12698

Li, J., & Huang, J. S. (2020). Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory. Technology in Society, 63 , 101410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410

Lin, X.-F., Zhou, Y., Shen, W., Luo, G., Xian, X., & Pang, B. (2023). Modeling the structural relationships among Chinese secondary school students’ computational thinking efficacy in learning AI, AI literacy, and approaches to learning AI. Education and Information Technologies . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12029-4

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–16).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Ma, R., Sanusi, I. T, Mahipal, V., Gonzales, J., & Martin, F. (2023). Developing machine learning algorithm literacy with novel plugged and unplugged approaches.  Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education , 298–304.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569772

Mahipal, V., Ghosh, S. Sanusi, I. T., Ma, R., Gonzales, J. E., & Martin, F.G. (2023). DoodleIt: A novel tool and approach for teaching how CNNs perform image recognition. Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE ’23 ), January 30-February 3, 2023, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3576123.3576127

Manasia, L., Ianos, M. G., & Chicioreanu, T. D. (2020). Pre-service teacher preparedness for fostering education for sustainable development: An empirical analysis of central dimensions of teaching readiness. Sustainability, 12 (1), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010166

Martin, A. J. (2012). Part II commentary: Motivation and engagement: Conceptual, operational, and empirical clarity. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds .), Handbook of Research on Student Engagemen t, 5 , 303–311 Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_14

McClure, E. R., Guernsey, L., Clements, D. H., Bales, S. N., Nichols, J., Kendall-Taylor, N., & Levine, M. H. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. Joan Ganz Cooney center at sesame workshop. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574402 . Accessed 12 Sept 2023.

Molefi, R. R., & Ayanwale, M. A. (2023). Using composite structural equation modeling to examine high school teachers’ acceptance of e-learning after Covid-19. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences., 10 (1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v10i1.8837

Naftzger, N. J. (2018).  Exploring the role purpose-related experiences can play in supporting interest development in STEM [Ph.D., Northern Illinois University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. United States– Illinois, 1–351. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/exploring-role-purpose-related-experiencescan/docview/2183332528/se-2?accountid=13425

Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7 (5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014

Ng, T. K., & Chu, K. W. (2021). Motivating students to learn AI through social networking sites: A case study in Hong Kong. Online Learning, 25 (1), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2454

Nygren, B., Aléx, L., Jonsén, E., Gustafson, Y., Norberg, A., & Lundman, B. (2005). Resilience, sense of coherence, purpose in life and self-transcendence in relation to perceived physical and mental health among the oldest old. Aging & Mental Health, 9 (4), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360500114415

Okita, S. Y. (2012). Social interactions and learning. In Seel N. M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning , 23, 182–211. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1770

Okundaye, O., Natarajarathinam, M., Qiu, S., Kuttolamadom, M. A., Chu, S., & Quek, F. (2022). Making STEM real: The design of a making-production model for hands-on STEM learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47 (6), 1122–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2121685

Opesemowo, O., Obanisola, A., & Oluwatimilehin, T. (2022). From brick-and-mortar to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Osun state, Nigeria. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 8 (1), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v8i1.286

Palade, M., & Carutasu, G. (2021). Organizational readiness for artificial intelligence adoption. Transaction on Engineering and Management, 7 (1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102497

Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Attitudes towards the use of educational robotics: Exploring pre-service and in-service early childhood teacher profiles. Education Sciences , 11 (5), 204. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/5/204 . Accessed 7 Oct 2023.

Park, J., Teo, T. W., Teo, A., Chang, J., Huang, J. S., & Koo, S. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence into science lessons: Teachers’ experiences and views. International Journal of STEM Education, 10 (1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00454-3

Patar, K. (2023). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ engagement in Geogebra Applet-based task design in online learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2540 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106241

Poondej, C., & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2016). The development of gamified learning activities to increase student engagement in learning. Australian Educational Computing , 31 (2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1123845

Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27 (4), 485–527.

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36 (4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

Reeves, S. L., Henderson, M. D., Cohen, G. L., Steingut, R. R., Hirschi, Q., & Yeager, D. S. (2021). Psychological affordances help explain where a self-transcendent purpose intervention improves performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000246

Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50 (1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.999920

Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116 (9), 1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., and Becker, J.-M. (2022). “SmartPLS 4.” Oststeinbek: SmartPLS GmbH, http://www.smartpls.com . Accessed 15 Oct 2023.

Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles. Data in Brief, 48 , 109074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109074

Rowston, K., Bower, M., & Woodcock, S. (2020). The lived experiences of career-change pre-service teachers and the promise of meaningful technology pedagogy beliefs and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 25 (2), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10064-8

Roy, R., Babakerkhell, M. D., Mukherjee, S., Pal, D., & Funilkul, S. (2022). Evaluating the intention for the adoption of artificial intelligence-based robots in the university to educate the students. IEEE Access, 10 , 125666–125678. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3225555

Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., & Knobloch, N. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ experiences of STEM integration: Challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29 (3), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9

Sanusi, I. T. (2023). Machine Learning Education in the K–12 Context (Doctoral dissertation, Itä-Suomen yliopisto). https://www.uef.fi/en/article/doctoral-defence-of-ismaila-temitayo-sanusi-med-19122023-machine-learning-education-in-the-k-12 . Accessed 27 Oct 2023.

Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024a). Investigating the moderating effects of social good and confidence on teachers’ intention to prepare school students for artificial intelligence education. Education and Information Technologies, 29 (1), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12250-1

Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Tolorunleke, A. E. (2024b). Investigating pre-service teachers’ artificial intelligence perception from the perspective of planned behavior theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6 , 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202

Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., & Omidiora, J. O. (2022). Exploring teachers’ preconceptions of teaching machine learning in high school: A preliminary insight from Africa. Computers and Education Open, 3 , 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100072

Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., Vartiainen, H., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2023). Developing middle school students’ understanding of machine learning in an African school. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5 , 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100155

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Jr-Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27 (3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003

Schnitzler, K., Holzberger, D., & Seidel, T. (2021). All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36 , 627–652.

Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35 (3), 553–572.

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S. & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing , 12 (4), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Sing, C. C., Teo, T., Huang, F., Chiu, T. K. F., & Xing, W. (2022). Secondary school students’ intentions to learn AI: Testing moderation effects of readiness, social good and optimism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70 (3), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10111-1

Suliman, M., Ghani, N., Sohail, M., & Reed, P. G. (2022). Self-transcendence and spiritual well-being among stroke patients. Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat, 12 (1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2022.12.1.628

Sun, Y., Ni, L., Zhao, Y., Shen, X. L., & Wang, N. (2019). Understanding students’ engagement in MOOCs: An integration of self-determination theory and theory of relationship quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (6), 3156–3174.

Suryadi, A., Purwaningsih, E., Yuliati, L., & Koes-Handayanto, S. (2023). STEM teacher professional development in pre-service teacher education: A literature review. Waikato Journal of Education ,  28 (1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v28i1.1063

Taherdoost, H. (2019). What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design; review of different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/Likert scale. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 8 (1). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3588604 . Accessed 22 Oct 2023.

Tang, X., & Chen, Y. (2018). Fundamentals of artificial intelligence (p. 9787567575615). East China Normal University.

Tarantino, K., McDonough, J., & Hua, M. (2013). Effects of student engagement with social media on student learning: A review of literature. The Journal of Technology in Student Affairs, 1 (8), 1–8.

Taskiran, N. (2023). Effect of artificial intelligence course in nursing on students’ medical artificial intelligence readiness: A comparative quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educator, 48 (5), E147–E152. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001446

Terzi, R. (2020). An adaptation of artificial intelligence anxiety scale into Turkish: Reliability and validity study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7 (4), 1501–1515.

Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Breazeal, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). A Year in K–12 AI Education. AI Magazine, 40 (4), 88–90. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i4.5289

Volet, S., Jones, C., & Vauras, M. (2019). Attitude-, group-and activity-related differences in the quality of pre-service teacher students’ engagement in collaborative science learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 73 , 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.05.002

Wang, Y.-Y., & Wang, Y.-S. (2022). Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 30 (4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887

Weng, F., Yang, R. J., Ho, H. J., & Su, H. M. (2018). A TAM-based study of the attitude towards use intention of multimedia among School Teachers. Applied System Innovations, 1 (3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi1030036

Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K., Lee, M., Sanusi, I. T., Dai, Y., & Chai, C. S. (2022). A self-determination theory (SDT) design approach for inclusive and diverse artificial intelligence (AI) education. Computers & Education, 189 , 104582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104582

Xuan, P. Y., Fahumida, M. I. F., Hussain, M. I. A. N., Jayathilake, N. T., Khobragade, S., Soe, H. H. K., . . . Htay, M. N. N. (2023). Readiness towards artificial intelligence among undergraduate medical students in Malaysia. Education in Medicine Journal, 15 (2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2023.15.2.4

Yadrovskaia, M., Porksheyan, M., Petrova, A., Dudukalova, D., & Bulygin, Y. (2023). About the attitude towards artificial intelligence technologies. Proceedings of E3S Web of Conferences , 376 , 05025. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337605025

Yau, K. W., Chai, C. S., Chiu, T. K. F., Meng, H., King, I., & Yam, Y. (2023). A phenomenographic approach on teacher conceptions of teaching artificial intelligence (AI) in K-12 schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28 (1), 1041–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11161-x

Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M. D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107 (4), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037637

Yıldız-Feyzioğlu, E., & Kıran, R. (2022). Investigating the relationships between self-efficacy for argumentation and critical thinking skills. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33 (5), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1967568

Yllana-Prieto, F., González-Gómez, D., & Jeong, J. S. (2023). The escape room and breakout as an aid to learning STEM contents in primary schools: An examination of the development of pre-service teachers in Spain. Education, 3–13 , 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2163183

Zhan, E. S., Molina, M. D., Rheu, M., & Peng, W. (2023). What is there to fear? Understanding Multi-dimensional fear of AI from a technological affordance perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 10 , 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2261731

Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20 (1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7

Download references

Open access funding provided by University of Johannesburg.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Science and Technology Education, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa

Musa Adekunle Ayanwale & Oluwaseyi Aina Gbolade Opesemowo

School of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland

Emmanuel Kwabena Frimpong & Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Musa Adekunle Ayanwale .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Applications and services that use the latest AI technologies are much more convenient to use.

I prefer to use the most advanced AI technologies.

I am confident that AI technologies will follow my instructions.

I can use different software to support AI learning.

I can use appropriate hardware to support AI learning.

I have access to relevant content on AI.

I am confident that I can succeed if I work hard enough in learning AI.

I am certain that I can learn the basic concepts of AI.

I am certain that I can understand the most difficult AI resources.

I am certain that I can design AI applications.

Learning to understand all of the special functions associated with an AI technique/product makes me anxious.

Learning to use AI techniques/product makes me anxious.

Learning how an AI techniques/product works makes me anxious.

Learning to interact with an AI technique/product makes me anxious.

I look forward to using AI in my daily life.

I would like to use AI in my learning.

It is important that my future students learn AI.

It is important that my future students acquire the necessary abilities to take advantage of AI.

Self-Transcendent Goals

I wish to use my AI knowledge to serve others.

I wish I use AI to help people with physical and mental difficulties.

I wish I could design AI applications that can benefit people.

I am ready to learn design thinking to enhance my ability to use AI for helping others.

I want to learn AI knowledge to help me to have a positive impact on the world.

I want to master AI technologies to become a citizen who contributes to society.

Cognitive Engagement—Critical Thinking

In this AI course, I use different possible ways to complete the task.

In this AI course, I think the good and bad of different methods.

In this AI course, I provide different reasons and evidence for my opinions.

In this AI course, I consider different opinions to see which one makes more sense.

In this AI course, I generate many new ideas.

In this AI course, I create different solutions for a problem.

In this AI course, I suggest new ways of doing things.

In this AI course, I produce ideas that are likely to be useful.

Behavioral Engagement—Self-Directed Learning

In this AI course, I explore the online resources on my own.

In this AI course, I set goals to complete this AI class.

In this AI course, I think about different ways or methods I can use to improve my learning.

In this AI course, I adjust my learning method based on my learning progression.

In this AI course, my colleagues and I actively work together to learn new things.

In this AI course, my colleagues and I actively discuss different views we have about things we are learning.

In this AI course, my colleagues and I actively work together to complete tasks.

In this AI course, my colleagues and I actively share and explain our understanding.

In this AI course, my colleagues and I develop complex ideas.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Ayanwale, M.A., Frimpong, E.K., Opesemowo, O.A.G. et al. Exploring Factors That Support Pre-service Teachers’ Engagement in Learning Artificial Intelligence. Journal for STEM Educ Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00121-4

Download citation

Accepted : 25 March 2024

Published : 12 April 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00121-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Artificial intelligence
• Pre-service teachers
• Student engagement
• Self-transcendent goals
• School education
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research