polyu thesis submission

Quick Access

• Research Postgraduate Studies
• Research at PolyU
• Study at PolyU
• HK PhD Fellowship Scheme
• The Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme under the Research Grants Council
• PolyU A to Z
• Alumni Affairs Office
• Academic Registry
• Finance Office
• Information Technology Services
• Pao Yue-Kong Library
• Research and Innovation Office
• Student Affairs Office
• University Health Services

Prospective Students

• How to Apply for Research Studies
• Admission Requirements
• Find a Supervisor
• Fellowship & Scholarship Schemes
• The Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme
• PolyU Sports Scholarship Scheme for RPg Students
• Dual PhD Degree Programmes
• Collaborative PhD Training Programmes
• Research Student Attachment Programme – Incoming
• Research Postgraduate Studies Booklet
• Words from Graduates
• Current Students
• List of Research Postgraduate Subjects
• Awards Grants and Scholarships
• PolyU PhD Scholars International Collaborative Research Fellowship (ICRF)
• Resources for Skills Enhancement
• Notices to Students
• Useful Information for New Research Postgraduate Students
• Academic Integrity
• Online Systems
• Equal Semester/Term
• Academic Calendar
• Graduation Requirements
• Research Postgraduate Student Handbook
• Forms for Students
• Tuition Fees and Other Fees
• Research Student Attachment Programme – Outgoing

Undergraduate Research

• Message from PolyU President
• Funding Schemes for CURI Students
• Application for Two-Year URIS 2024/25
• Potential Supervisor List
• Approved Project Lists 2021 - 2023
• Best URIS Research Project Award 2023
• URIS Handbook and Forms
• About CURI RC
• UG Summer Research Abroad Sponsorship (USRA)
• Congregation Matters
• Award and Parchment
• Electronic Certifications – Award Parchments and Transcript of Studies
• Forms for Graduates
• Online System for Congregation Matters
• Guidelines and Regulations for Research Postgraduate Studies
• RPg Admission Information
• HKPFS 2024-25
• Promotion Resources for HKPFS
• Sharing Session on HKPFS Promotion & Recruitment
• UPSF System
• Joint PhD Supervision Scheme with Chinese Mainland Universities
• PolyU-A*STAR Joint PhD Supervision Programme
• Guidelines on Research Student Attachment Programme (RSAP)
• Faculty Research Committee / School Board
• Departmental / School Research Committee
• Checklists for RPg Student-Related Processes

News and Events

• GS Newsletter
• International Research Summer School 2024
• Outstanding Research Postgraduate Alumni Award 2024
• PolyU PhD Info Week 2023
• PolyU Research Student Conference (PRSC) 2023
• PhD Thesis Award 2023
• Best Research Postgraduate Student of the Year 2023
• Enrichment Activities
• Distinguished Speaker Series
• Message from Dean
• Vision and Mission
• Advisory Committee
• GS Ambassador Programme
• Contacts by Functions

Credit/Coursework Requirements

You can book the RLSA test session via ELC’s booking system : https://elc.polyu.edu.hk/booking/rlsa.php .

Please take the RLSA in your first semester of study at PolyU and enrol in the English enhancement subject(s) only after obtaining the result of the RLSA as informed by ELC.

The coursework requirements of individual programmes may vary. You should check with your department or refer to the programme document for individual programme requirements. Approval from your Chief Supervisor must be sought before taking any subjects. For general coursework requirements, please see here . The GPA requirement and calculation of the qualifying GPA can be found here .

Confirmation of Registration

You have to confirm your registration before the deadline as stipulated here . 

The detailed procedures and regulations governing the confirmation of registration can be found here .

Transfer of Registration between MPhil and PhD

You can apply for transfer between MPhil and PhD degrees subject to certain conditions. For details, please see  here .

Changing your Mode of Study

You can apply to change your study mode by completing form GSB/45 . Depending on the time of application, your periods of study may remain unchanged, shortened or extended on a pro-rata basis. Detailed information can be found  here .

Student Development

Research student attachment programme.

Successful incoming applicants will receive payment by cheque. Subsequently, the student shall pick up the cheques from the GS on a monthly basis until his/her departure from Hong Kong or until the funding is exhausted.

Thesis Submission, Oral Examination and Graduation

Student financial matters, research equipment resources and facilities, other general enquiries.

For RPg students admitted from the 2018/19 cohort onwards, please approach the AR for a letter in support of your application.

For RPg students admitted on or before the 2017/18 cohort, please approach the GS. Detailed information can be found here .

Last updated: 21 Dec 2022

We use Cookies to give you a better experience on our website. By continuing to browse the site without changing your privacy settings, you are consenting to our use of Cookies. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy Statement .

Your browser is not the latest version. If you continue to browse our website, Some pages may not function properly. You are recommended to upgrade to a newer version or switch to a different browser. A list of the web browsers that we support can be found here

What are you looking for?

Popular Search

• Research studies

Guidelines for Confirmation Report Writing

All PhD students are required to submit a Confirmation Report, which is also called a Thesis Proposal, a Research Proposal or a Qualifying Report, within the first 18-24 months after registration. This document provides information about preparing this report and the basic elements that should be included in it. As the requirements for the content, format and length of a proposal vary across disciplines and departments, you are advised to consult your supervisor before you start working on your proposal.

What is the purpose of a confirmation report?

The main purpose of the report is to provide a clear and carefully prepared outline of the proposed research and explain it regarding its focus and the specific methodological approach. It allows you to establish the validity of the research topic for a PhD dissertation and enables your department to determine whether your proposed methods will yield results and understandings worthy of a doctoral thesis. As your research is still at a preliminary stage, the individual sections in your research plan will not be as comprehensive as in your thesis. However, your report is expected to follow the basic structure of a thesis and generally expected to include the following sections:

Abstract Introduction Literature Review Methods Preliminary Results and Analysis Significance and Implications Future Plan References

The following paragraphs of this document briefly outline the content of the main sections of a confirmation report.

The Abstract is expected to provide a clear and concise summary of the proposed research and include brief statements summarising the content of the sections in the report. It should include enough information to allow the supervisor and members of the examining panel to make preliminary judgements on the significance of the study and its validity for a PhD thesis. The completeness of this section depends on the progress of your study at the time of submission. You may have obtained preliminary results or may be in the stage of finalising the research design. If you have not progressed to this stage, you should elaborate the feasibility of the study and state the results you expect to obtain. This section should not include any references or footnotes.

Introduction

The Introduction to your Confirmation Report is expected to provide the reader with a good understanding of the study, its theoretical basis and objectives. You will need to introduce your research topic, explain its significance and situate it within a concise yet purposeful review of current research in the field relevant to the research topic. The main purpose of reviewing the literature in your Introduction is to identify the research gap that your proposed research intends to address. An exhaustive Literature Review is presented in a separate section following this concise overview of current research.

You should outline how the proposed research addresses the research gap, outline the main aims and objectives of your proposed research, research questions or hypotheses if any, and justify how the methods adopted will enable you to realise these objectives. You should conclude this section with an overview of the organisation of the different sections of the report.

Literature Review

In a Confirmation Report, the main objectives of the Literature Review are to:

• identify the central focus and the main themes of the proposed research;
• demonstrate an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of the research topic;
• establish the context for your proposed research.

To write an effective Literature Review, you should not merely refer to existing research; you need to present a carefully crafted research story which critically evaluates and integrates existing theoretical perspectives and findings to identify aspects of the topic that have yet not been investigated, and justifies the research as an attempt to fill the gap in current research the review has identified. You are also expected to justify your methodological approach to the research, indicate how it will address its objectives and allow you to answer your research questions. Your review of the literature could either be part of the Introduction or be presented as a separate chapter, depending on the extent and depth of your discussion and the nature of your research. Commonly noted shortcomings of literature reviews in Confirmation Reports are:

• a lack of organisation and structure;
• a lack of focus and coherence;
• omission of references to influential research;
• citing irrelevant and unimportant references.

This section of your report introduces the proposed methodology and methods adopted. You are expected to describe your methods and measures in detail, justify their selection and establish their validity in terms of achieving the aims of the research. You should describe the experiment(s), your calculations and data analysis in a systematic and in-depth manner, and explain your research design. It is also important to explicitly state the reliability and validity of your measures and how they are relevant to your research questions and objectives. All procedures selected must be explained and justified to allow your supervisor to assess the feasibility and generalisability of your research design, the validity of its expected results and the significance of the study for a doctoral thesis.

You should state your hypotheses, propositions, or research questions clearly, and show how they link to existing theory and literature. You also need to defend your proposed methods and demonstrate that they are achievable and worthy of doctoral research. This is even more important if your research has not yielded preliminary results and is still at the design stage, as it will inform the reader about what you intend to do for your proposed research and how you will proceed to achieve your objectives. The length and organisation of this section can vary depending on how the study is designed. Alternative headings for this section could include:

• Methodology
• Experimental Design
• Materials and Methods
• System Model and Problem Formulation

As there is considerable variation across disciplines and universities regarding the requirements for this section, you should refer to your departmental guidelines and consult your supervisor for clarification about how it should be developed.

• Preliminary Results and Analysis

This section of your report is a critical indicator of the validity of the research design and methods adopted in terms of achieving the research objectives. It establishes your progress towards completing your doctoral research and the significance and originality of the contribution of the study to the field of study.

You are expected to synthesise the key preliminary results which you have obtained by following the procedures outlined in the Methods section. You should present these results clearly and logically using accurate and clearly labelled graphs, tables and figures and analyse them to establish how they are derived from the procedures described in the Methods section. This chapter may be entitled:

• Results and Analysis
• Preliminary Results and Discussion
• Simulation Results
• Experimental Results
• Possible Outcomes

Significance and Implications in Confirmation Reports

In this section of your Confirmation Report, you are expected to establish the significance of the research in both practical and theoretical terms, and outline your initial understanding of how you expect the preliminary results to answer the research questions. This discussion is significant in that it will demonstrate the originality of the research and establish its contribution to the field, and validate the worth of the research for a doctoral thesis.

This section mainly demonstrates what the results mean and identifies their significance particularly in terms of addressing the research objectives. You should hence avoid merely repeating the results and briefly commenting on them. Given the preliminary stage of your research, this section will be quite short. However, you should outline the implications for theory and practice and, if possible, identify limitations of the research methods adopted or difficulties posed by your preliminary results. If you have identified any perceived limitations, you should discuss proposed modifications you intend to make to your research design to demonstrate an in-depth awareness of available methods and how you will proceed to overcome the limitations.

In general, this section includes:

• a brief statement of the overall aims of the study and a summary of the key results;
• an interpretation of the results in terms of their implications and the significance of the study;
• an identification of the limitations of the preliminary results obtained and proposed changes to the research design in response to the limitations identified.

Consider the following questions when developing this section:

• What are the most significant findings from your preliminary results?
• To what extent do your preliminary results contribute towards expected outcomes of the study?
• What generalisations can be made following your preliminary results?
• Are there any possible limitations of your research design and/or your preliminary results, and how might they impact your research?

As you are at a preliminary stage of your PhD study, your discussion will be tentative and you should avoid making strong, conclusive comments.

Future Plan

In this section, you are expected to outline your plan for the remaining part of your candidature. You should include a timeline for your study stating the estimated completion date for each stage of your research and the expected date of submission.

The list of references should include all sources cited in the thesis. You will need to confer with your supervisor or consult departmental guidelines about the format appropriate for your discipline.

Important points to remember:

• Your confirmation document should provide all information required in a concise yet comprehensive and logical manner. Its expected length is normally between 50-70 pages.
• For clarification about the content and structure of your report, confer with your supervisor.
• In terms of language use in your report, follow academic writing conventions and disciplinary conventions, especially with the use of tenses, voice (active or passive) and the use of the first person plural form ‘we’. You should also be more tentative (i.e. less assertive), especially when interpreting your results and discussing their significance.
• For more information about the content, structure and language use conventions to follow when preparing your confirmation report, you may refer to this link: http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk

• The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
• Guides & Tutorials

Citation & Avoiding Plagiarism

• Plagiarism Checking Tools
• Plagiarism & Academic Integrity
• Generative AI & Plagiarism
• Citation Guides by Subjects

Available Plagiarism Checking Tools

Student faqs on plagiarism checking.

• Build-in Citation Tools
• Reference Management Tools This link opens in a new window
• Library Workshops & Courses

Need Help? Contact Us!

Text similarity checking tools can assist in detecting potential plagiarism. Each tool will check against a collection of papers and webpages from their underlying database. Different tools may serve different purposes and audiences. PolyU has subscribed to  Turnitin for checking student works and VeriGuide for checking academic papers and grants applications.

Here is a quick comparison of available plagiarism checking tools: 

Apart from these, some online plagiarism checking tools and AI detector tools are listed here. Do check with your instructor or supervisor if it is acceptable to use any of the tools to check your work.

Plagiarism checking tools

• Viper Plagiarism Checker
• Dupli Checker

AI detector tools

• Content at Scale AI Detector
• AI Text Classifier 
• Writers AI Content Detector

1. How can I create an account in Turnitin?

As a student, you will not be able to create an account -  your instructor will create a Turnitin assignment link for you  to submit your assignment. The link will be available on the course page in Learn@PolyU(理學網). 

2. How can I check similarity for my thesis in Turnitin?

You may check the similarity rate for your thesis in Turnitin, but you will need to seek your supervisor's help to create a Turnitin assignment for you . The link can be embedded in a course that is designated for checking students' works. For technical details, please check with ITS Blackboard Support at 2766 5900 or through IT Online ServiceDesk .

3. How can I check similarity for my journal article in Turnitin?

Turnitin is mainly for checking student assignments. To check journal articles, VeriGuide will be a better choice since it covers scholarly journal articles and free internet resources. Since VeriGuide is limited to PolyU academic staff only, please seek your supervisor's help to have your article (most likely co-authored with your supervisor) checked on VeriGuide. Alternatively, you may also subscribe iThenticate and check your work there. 

4. What % of similarity is safe?

There’s no official answer. All plagiarism checking tools are text-matching tools and are not able to determine intent. They do not grade paper for instructors; instead, instructors will judge the paper based on information provided in the similarity report.

Always focus on making sure proper acknowledgment is made instead of reducing the text similarity!

5. Can I resubmit my work to get a new similarity report?

It depends on whether resubmission has been enabled by your instructor. If resubmission is enabled, you will need to wait 24 hours to get a new similarity report on any resubmission. For details please refer to  Quick Student Guide to Using Turnitin with LEARN@PolyU .

6. I resubmitted my work to another Turnitin assignment and received a very high similarity index. What should I do?

First of all, it is not ethical to submit the same work to two different assignments. If you wish to check the similarity of a revised version, you need to resubmit via the same Turnitin assignment portal. 

If you have submitted the work to two different assignments and wish to keep the latest submission, you may seek your instructor's help to delete the original submission from their database. Your instructor should contact the Turnitin administrator (which is ITS) and provide them with the class ID, paper ID, and the assignment name. ITS colleagues will then request Turnitin Support Team to remove the submission. More information can be read here .

7. Can I exclude references in the similarity report?

You may exclude references by applying a filter “ Exclude Bibliography ”. Steps can be found here . Most likely this will result in a lower similarity percentage. The similarity report will indicate the filters you have applied. 

Do check with your instructor if this is acceptable for the assignment!

• << Previous: Citation Guides by Subjects
• Next: Build-in Citation Tools >>
• Last Updated: Apr 3, 2024 11:46 AM
• URL: https://libguides.lb.polyu.edu.hk/academic-integrity

• Help & FAQ

School of Design

• The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
• Phone 2766 5454
• Email [email protected]
• Website https://www.sd.polyu.edu.hk

Student theses

• Title (descending)

Search results

Adventurous homemaking: exploring collaborations toward agroecological probabilities.

Student thesis : PhD

A Framework of Culture-based Innovation for the Protection and Development of Intangible Cultural Heritages for Design with Focus on Yanchuan Patchwork

Supervisor: de Bont, C. J. P. M. (Chief supervisor) & Wei, H. (Co-supervisor)

An analytical study of motivation for creative workers in China's creative industries

Supervisor: Ma, C. F. H. (Chief supervisor) & Ng, M. Y. S. (Co-supervisor)

An exploration on the roles of design to create shared value as an integrative social and business innovation process

Supervisor: Liu, X. (Chief supervisor), de Bont, C. J. P. M. (Co-supervisor) & Gutierrez, L. (Co-supervisor)

Business Incubation Process for Design Start-ups: Case Studies on Government-based and University-based Business Incubators in Hong Kong

Supervisor: Liu, X. (Chief supervisor) & Ng, M. Y. S. (Co-supervisor)

Design for Technology-Mediated Memorable and Meaningful Tourism Experiences: A Strengths-Based Approach

Supervisor: Chow, K. N. (Chief supervisor), de Bont, C. J. P. M. (External person) (Chief supervisor) & Hekkert, P. (External person) (Chief supervisor)

Experiencing stories through artifacts: An authoring model for tangible narratives

Supervisor: Wei, H. (Chief supervisor) & Ng, M. Y. S. (Co-supervisor)

Finding the Found - Critically locating contextually-reflective photographs

Supervisor: Oh, J. (Chief supervisor) & Gutierrez, L. (Co-supervisor)

Morphologies of resilience: Towards an approach to the study of urban spatial resilience

Supervisor: Bruyns, G. (Chief supervisor) & Higgins, C. D. (Co-supervisor)

Practice of Invitation: Art and Meaningful Participatio

Student thesis : MPhil

Responsible social media: Development and evaluation of key guiding principles

Supervisor: Wei, H. (Chief supervisor) & Chow, K. N. (Co-supervisor)

Towards a comprehensive and integrated framework that serves as a basis to describe, stimulate and analyze innovation in intelligent products

Supervisor: Liu, X. (Co-supervisor) & de Bont, C. J. P. M. (Chief supervisor)

“A Touch of Classical Chinese Poetry: Enriching Interactive Everyday Products with Poetic Metaphor”

Supervisor: Chow, K. N. (Co-supervisor)

“Design Museums in a “City of Design” in China”

Supervisor: Bruyns, G. (Co-supervisor)

“The Production of the Visual Images of Tibet: A Semiotic and Contextual Study”

Quick Access

• Course Resource List
• Library Online Courses
• New Additions
• Newsletter & e-Bulletin
• Suggest a Purchase
• Support During Online Teaching/Learning
• Digital Collections Portal
• Open Educational Resources (OER)
• Outstanding Work by Students (OWS)
• PolyU Institutional Research Archive (PIRA)
• MakerMindset@i-Space
• Library Extension and Revitalisation (LER) Project

• Databases A-Z

Dissertations & Theses @ Hong Kong Polytechnic University (via ProQuest)

Dissertations & Theses @ Hong Kong Polytechnic University (via ProQuest) provides full-text access to PolyU dissertations and theses from 1998-2013. Dissertations and theses after 2014 are available at PolyU Electronic Theses (Master and PhD) .

• Dissertations & Theses

Important Notes:

• Users should not use Virtual Private Network (VPN) service when accessing e-resources from off campus. This may trigger suspension of user's account.
• For security reason, you are advised to change NetPassword regularly via IdPortal and follow the password rules . Please visit the ITS website for details.

Copyright Warning

Unfair use of copyright works or violation of license agreements may result in the termination of access to e-resources for the entire University community.  Activities including, but not limited to, excessive/systematic downloading or access via robotic tools are strictly prohibited.  Legal action will be taken by the copyright owner. The Library will suspend users' off-campus access to all e-resources who have committed excess download. [More information]

讀者濫用版權作品或違反版權合約，版權人將會採取法律行動，並停止大學全體師生使用電子資源。被嚴禁的行為包括(但不僅限於)：大量或有系統性的下載及透過自動化工具進入電子資源. 違者會被暫停所有電子資源之遠程接收. [詳情]

• Beyond PolyU (HKALL + Interlibrary Loan)
• PolyU Reads
• Audios & Videos
• Google Scholar@PolyU
• Outstanding Work by Students
• Cheng Kok-kong’s Lyric Manuscript
• Rare Books on China and East Asia
• Exam Papers
• Thematic Collection
• Guides & Tutorials
• Library Workshops
• Research Consultation
• Faculty Librarians
• Citation Search Service
• Citation & Avoiding Plagiarism
• Reuse Copyright Materials
• Research Data Management
• EndNote & Others
• Researchers@Library
• Research Impact
• Researcher Profiles
• Open Access & APC Waivers
• ORCID-Scopus@PolyU
• DS Workstations & Software
• Online Tools
• Digitisation Services
• Digital Humanities Projects

Teaching & Learning

• Recommend Course Readings & Reserve Books
• Create a Resource List in Learn@PolyU
• Contact Librarians
• PolyU Open Educational Resources Portal
• InfoLit for U (MOOC)
• Using Copyright Materials
• Course Programmes
• Library Orientation
• Request a Workshop

Using the Library

• Collection Development Policy
• NetID & NetPassword
• Loan Privileges
• Renew & Request
• Interlibrary Loan
• JULAC Library Card
• Computers, Laptops & Tablets
• Printing, Scanning & Copying
• i-Space Facilities
• Battery Charging
• Wi-Fi Services
• Quiet & Group Study Spaces
• Academic Presentation Spaces
• 24-Hour Study Centre
• Studios@Library
• Special Equipment Room
• Enquiries & Suggestions
• Request a Library Tour
• Apply a Library Card

User Privileges

• Undergraduate Students
• Postgraduate Students
• Students with Special Educational Needs
• Academic, Research & Administrative Staff
• General Staff
• Retired Academic Staff
• Retired General Staff
• PolyU CPCE Students (SPEED/HKCC)
• JULAC Users
• Access to Library
• Access to e-resources
• Borrowing & Return
• Computing Facilities
• Vision, Mission & Strategic Plan
• Facts & Figures
• Collection Development
• Newsletter & e-Bulletin
• 360 Virtual Library Tour
• Privacy Statement
• Library Regulations
• Conduct of Library Users
• Library Food & Drink Policy
• Electronic Resources Copyright Warning
• Donation of Books & Print Materials
• Honour with Books
• Staff Directory

We use Cookies to give you a better experience on our website. By continuing to browse the site without changing your privacy settings, you are consenting to our use of Cookies. For more information, please see our Privacy Statement .

Site Search

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback.

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly.

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation .

• Notifications

• myPNW Login
• Brightspace Login
• PNW Calendar
• Scholarships
• Tuition and Fees

« All Events

Last Day to Submit Approved Thesis (Approved by West Lafayette) – May 2024 Graduate Student Candidates

May 2024 Graduate Student Candidates, the last day to submit your approved thesis (approved by West Lafayette) is Friday, May 3, 2024.

To request a disability-related accommodation, please contact the Office of Institutional Equity at [email protected] or (219) 989-2163 five days prior to the event.

• Google Calendar
• Outlook 365
• Outlook Live