five misunderstandings about case study research. qualitative inquiry

• Help & FAQ

Five misunderstandings about case-study research

• Transport and Logistics

Research output : Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

• Geen BTA classificatie

T1 - Five misunderstandings about case-study research

AU - Flyvbjerg, B

KW - Geen BTA classificatie

M3 - Article

SN - 1077-8004

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

Help | Advanced Search

Quantitative Finance > General Finance

Title: five misunderstandings about case-study research.

Abstract: This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (1) Theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (2) One cannot generalize from a single case, therefore the single case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (3) The case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, while other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (4) The case study contains a bias toward verification; and (5) It is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. The article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and that a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of more good case studies.

Submission history

Access paper:.

• Other Formats

References & Citations

• Google Scholar
• Semantic Scholar

BibTeX formatted citation

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, data and media associated with this article, recommenders and search tools.

• Institution

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

B. Flyvbjerg

Apr 1, 2006

Influential Citations

Quality indicators

Qualitative Inquiry

Key Takeaway : Case-study research can contribute to scientific development and strengthen social science by addressing common misconceptions.

This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.

Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

• Institut for Bæredygtighed og Planlægning

Publikation : Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Adgang til dokumentet

• 10.1177/1077800405284363
• BF Qualitative Inquiry 2006 vol 12 no 2 April pp 219-245 Forlagets udgivne version, 125 KB

Fingeraftryk

• Case Study Nursing and Health Professions 100%
• Knowledge Social Sciences 33%
• Moral Concepts Social Sciences 33%
• Scientific Development Social Sciences 16%
• Social Sciences Social Sciences 16%
• Scientific Discipline Social Sciences 16%
• Theory Building Social Sciences 16%
• Bias Social Sciences 16%

Citationsformater

T1 - Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

AU - Flyvbjerg, Bent

N2 - This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.

AB - This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.

U2 - 10.1177/1077800405284363

DO - 10.1177/1077800405284363

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1077-8004

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research

2006, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 219-245

This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.

Related Papers

David Arellano-Gault

Veritas: The Academic Journal of St Clements Education Group

Mohamed A Eno , abderrazak dammak

Case studies have been subjected to both positive attributes and negative criticisms. Accordingly, there has been a growing academic discussion and debate about the usability of the case study with regard to its reliability. It has been accused of being a less rigorous, undependable, and ungeneralizable research method. The condemnation has led scholars and professionals among the researcher community to raise viewpoints that represent different schools of thought. Each school demonstrated its perception regarding the debate, of course with some concern. Whereas a section of researchers or scholars encourages the method as a useful approach, the other emphasizes its argument based on, among other things, what they call ‘lack of reliability’ of the case study, particularly external validity – whether a study carried out in the approach could indeed be generalized.

Edgar Ojeda

Teachers College Record

Lesley Bartlett

In this research note, the authors show that the case study methodological literature does not reflect the divergent epistemologies that inform case studies or the iterative nature of non-positivist research. Authors then describe four ways to address existing limitations of the case study methods literature to create a more promising approach, which they call the comparative case study approach.

Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics

Attilia Ruzzene

Melina Ocampo González

● Abstract This paper analyses the case study research methodology to answer the question about how fruitful is this method and whether or not it is worthy to be applied in social sciences. The case study method has been questioned and criticised along the history by some methodologists; others have defended it. The authors concluded that the case study method is generally criticized because it is arguably misunderstood. They recommend to researchers to follow a framework or pre-specified procedures to avoid false hypotheses and generalize from relative and ambiguous conclusions.

rizwan gujjar

IOSR Journals publish within 3 days

Abstract: A Case Study is one of the most popular and widely used methods in social research. Though case studies primarily involve qualitative research techniques, they can also make use of quantitative methods, thus, providing a fascinating turf for the interplay of both qualitative and quantitative methods in carrying out a social research. This paper is an attempt to study and examine the primary attributes of a case-study method and its potential for generating authoritative knowledge. Some of the major dimensions of a case study being reviewed and dealt with in this paper include –a) the debates surrounding the enunciation of precise definitions and key characteristics of a case study method b) the types of researches where case studies can be most aptly employed c) the relative utility and merits/demerits of case studies vis-à-vis other methods of qualitative research d) the issues of reliability and validity of a case study method and e) the seemingly unending debate surrounding the role of a case study in effecting broader generalizations and its future promise. Keywords: case study protocol, generalization, reliability, replication, research design.

Khullar Junior

Although case study methods remain a controversial approach to data collection, they are widely recognised in many social science studies especially when in-depth explanations of a social behaviour are sought after. This article, therefore, discusses several aspects of case studies as a research method. These include the design and categories of case studies and how their robustness can be achieved. It also explores on the advantages and disadvantages of case study as a research method.

Ali Haj Aghapour

Case-study as a qualitative research is a strongly debatable research strategy among all academicians and particularly practitioners. Therefore, in order to provide some upto-date insights into this controversial issue, the current paper seeks to investigate and document some aspects of case-study research. In fact, after reviewing some literatures in order to define, clarify and classify case-study research, the paper tries to consider and trade-off this qualitative strategy from different philosophical perspectives and approaches. Then, by relying on some recently outstanding papers and other highly recognized written resources, the paper gets into the appropriateness of casestudy including Generalizability, Validity, Construct validity, Internal validity and Reliability. Next, the role of case-study to build a social theory is investigated that leads to preset a step-bystep process to achieve this visionary goal. At the end, a brief comparison between case-study, as a common representative of qualitative research, and survey, an indicator of opposite view, is done. This paper contributes to research method’s development used by scholars looking to establish a case research by improving the level of understanding regarding the discussed issues. Index Terms- case-study appropriateness, case-study classification, case-study approaches.

RELATED PAPERS

Plant and Soil

Otto Heinemeyer

Laura Scrano

Applicable Analysis

Physical Review D

C. Pagliarone

The Qualitative Report

Diane Scotland-Coogan, LCSW

Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education

Bob Adamson

yann orlarey

Alzheimer's & Dementia

Jia-jyun Dong

Clinical and experimental rheumatology

Gerard Espinosa

Procedia Computer Science

Luca Zagarella

Journal of Trauma & Treatment

mahmoud khairy

Odd Erik Nygård

Rudy Buchheit

Karen Ovide

Computers and Composition

Dwedor Morais Ford, PhD

Jerry Kulah

RePEc: Research Papers in Economics

Lucie Laliberte

Giorgi Melikidze

Sapienza Organizacional

annelin diaz

Lingvisticae Investigationes

Raul Aranovich

USC毕业证书 南加大学位证

REY LUIS ARAUJO CASTILLO

AMEA Sosial Elmlər, №2

Tofiq Najafli

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024