light pollution essay introduction

Light Pollution

People all over the world are living under the nighttime glow of artificial light, and it is causing big problems for humans, wildlife, and the environment. There is a global movement to reduce light pollution, and everyone can help.

Conservation, Earth Science, Astronomy

Hong Kong Light Pollution

Boats, buildings, street lights, and even fireworks contribute to the light pollution in Victoria Harbor, Hong Kong. Light pollution can be detrimental to the health of people and animals in the area.

Photograph by Jodi Cobb

Most environmental pollution on Earth comes from humans and their inventions. Take, for example, the automobile or that miraculous human-made material, plastic . Today, automobile emissions are a major source of air pollution contributing to climate change, and plastics fill our ocean, creating a significant health hazard to marine animals.

And what about the electric lightbulb, thought to be one of the greatest human inventions of all time? Electric light can be a beautiful thing, guiding us home when the sun goes down, keeping us safe and making our homes cozy and bright. However, like carbon dioxide emissions and plastic , too much of a good thing has started to negatively impact the environment. Light pollution , the excessive or inappropriate use of outdoor artificial light, is affecting human health, wildlife behavior, and our ability to observe stars and other celestial objects.

That Earthly Sky Glow

Light pollution is a global issue. This became glaringly obvious when the World Atlas of Night Sky Brightness , a computer-generated map based on thousands of satellite photos, was published in 2016. Available online for viewing, the atlas shows how and where our globe is lit up at night. Vast areas of North America, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia are glowing with light, while only the most remote regions on Earth (Siberia, the Sahara, and the Amazon) are in total darkness. Some of the most light-polluted countries in the world are Singapore, Qatar, and Kuwait.

Sky glow is the brightening of the night sky, mostly over urban areas, due to the electric lights of cars, streetlamps, offices, factories, outdoor advertising, and buildings, turning night into day for people who work and play long after sunset.

People living in cities with high levels of sky glow have a hard time seeing more than a handful of stars at night. Astronomers are particularly concerned with sky glow pollution as it reduces their ability to view celestial objects.

More than 80 percent of the world’s population, and 99 percent of Americans and Europeans, live under sky glow. It sounds pretty, but sky glow caused by anthropogenic activities is one of the most pervasive forms of light pollution .

Is it Time to Get Up?

Artificial light can wreak havoc on natural body rhythms in both humans and animals. Nocturnal light interrupts sleep and confuses the circadian rhythm—the internal, twenty-four-hour clock that guides day and night activities and affects physiological processes in nearly all living organisms. One of these processes is the production of the hormone melatonin , which is released when it is dark and is inhibited when there is light present. An increased amount of light at night lowers melatonin production, which results in sleep deprivation, fatigue, headaches, stress, anxiety, and other health problems. Recent studies also show a connection between reduced melatonin levels and cancer. In fact, new scientific discoveries about the health effects of artificial light have convinced the American Medical Association (AMA) to support efforts to control light pollution and conduct research on the potential risks of exposure to light at night. Blue light, in particular, has been shown to reduce levels of melatonin in humans. Blue light is found in cell phones and other computer devices, as well as in light-emitting diodes (LEDs), the kinds of bulbs that have become popular at home and in industrial and city lighting due to their low cost and energy efficiency.

Animals are Lost and Confused, Too

Studies show that light pollution is also impacting animal behaviors, such as migration patterns , wake-sleep habits, and habitat formation. Because of light pollution , sea turtles and birds guided by moonlight during migration get confused, lose their way, and often die. Large numbers of insects, a primary food source for birds and other animals, are drawn to artificial lights and are instantly killed upon contact with light sources. Birds are also affected by this, and many cities have adopted a “Lights Out” program to turn off building lights during bird migration.

A study of blackbirds ( Turdus merula)  in Germany found that traffic noise and artificial night lighting causes birds in the city to become active earlier than birds in natural areas—waking and singing as much as five hours sooner than their country cousins. Even animals living under the sea may be affected by underwater artificial lighting. One study looked at how marine animals responded to brightly lit panels submerged under water off the coast of Wales. Fewer filter feeding animals, such as the sea squirt and sea bristle, made their homes near the lighted panels. This could mean that the light from oil rigs, passing ships, and harbors is altering marine ecosystems .

Even in places meant to provide protected natural habitats for wildlife, light pollution is making an impact. The National Park Service (NPS) has made maintaining a dark night sky a priority. The NPS Night Skies Team has been monitoring night sky brightness in some one hundred parks, and nearly every park showed at least some light pollution.

You Shouldn’t Need Sunglasses at Night

There are three other kinds of light pollution: glare, clutter, and light trespass. Glare is excessive brightness that can cause visual discomfort (for example, when driving). Clutter is bright, confusing, and excessive groupings of light sources (for example, Times Square in New York City, New York). Light trespass is when light extends into an area where it is not wanted or needed (like a streetlight illuminating a nearby bedroom window). Most outdoor lighting is poorly positioned, sending wasted electricity up into the sky.

Bring Back the Dark Sky

There are several organizations working to reduce light pollution. One of these is the U.S.-based International Dark Sky Association (IDA), formed in 1988 to preserve the natural night sky. IDA educates the public and certifies parks and other places that have worked to reduce their light emissions. In 2017, the IDA approved the first U.S. dark sky reserve. The massive Central Idaho Dark Sky Reserve, which clocks in at 3,667 square kilometers (1,416 square miles), joined eleven other dark sky reserves established around the world. As of December of 2018, IDA lists thirteen dark sky reserves on their site.

Stop Wasting Energy: Things We Can All Do

More people are taking action to reduce light pollution and bring back the natural night sky. Many states have adopted legislation to control outdoor lighting, and manufacturers have designed and produced high-efficiency light sources that save energy and reduce light pollution.

Individuals are urged to use outdoor lighting only when and where it is needed, to make sure outdoor lights are properly shielded and directing light down instead of up into the sky, and to close window blinds, shades, and curtains at night to keep light inside.

Instructional Links

Media credits.

The audio, illustrations, photos, and videos are credited beneath the media asset, except for promotional images, which generally link to another page that contains the media credit. The Rights Holder for media is the person or group credited.

Production Managers

Program specialists, last updated.

April 1, 2024

User Permissions

For information on user permissions, please read our Terms of Service. If you have questions about how to cite anything on our website in your project or classroom presentation, please contact your teacher. They will best know the preferred format. When you reach out to them, you will need the page title, URL, and the date you accessed the resource.

If a media asset is downloadable, a download button appears in the corner of the media viewer. If no button appears, you cannot download or save the media.

Text on this page is printable and can be used according to our Terms of Service .

Interactives

Any interactives on this page can only be played while you are visiting our website. You cannot download interactives.

Related Resources

• Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
• Climate Change
• Policy & Economics
• Biodiversity
• Conservation

Get focused newsletters especially designed to be concise and easy to digest

• ESSENTIAL BRIEFING 3 times weekly
• TOP STORY ROUNDUP Once a week
• MONTHLY OVERVIEW Once a month
• Enter your email *
• Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Explainer: What Is Light Pollution?

Although light pollution may not be as acute as other pollution like chemical or oil spillage that results in environmental destruction, light pollution is recognized as one of the most chronic environmental perturbations. With the emergence of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in the market, the energy cost of lighting has been drastically reduced compared to traditional incandescent light bulbs or even compacted fluorescent lamps. A growing number of studies reveal the alarming negative impact of light pollution on wildlife and human beings. Yet, the issue of light pollution is often overlooked. So, what is light pollution? How does light pollution alter behavior of wildlife and humans, and are there any current practices or solutions that help tackle light pollution?

What Is Light Pollution?

As defined by the International Dark-Sky Association, light pollution refers to any inappropriate or excessive use of artificial light , which affects humans, wildlife, and the climate. Light pollution can be in the form of glare, skyglow, light trespass, or clutter. The phenomenon of light pollution is a worldwide issue, where 80% of the world’s population currently lives in light polluted areas. A study found that satellite observable light emissions have increased by 49% in 2017 over the last 25 years, indicating a worsening trend of light pollution.

Effect of Light Pollution

Studies reveal the devastating ecological impact of animals dwelling in the natural environment. Artificial light is found to harm survivorship of newborn sea turtles hatching on the beach and disorient them from returning to the sea. Sea turtle hatchlings are known to have developed an instinct to follow light cues to orient themselves when they return to sea.  It is observed that beach light is highly attractive to hatchlings, causing them to move away from the sea. 

Another experimental study also discovered that hatchlings can be mis-oriented by artificial lights even in a water environment. Hatchlings suffering from light impacts spend a longer time in near or onshore environments, where nearby predators such as crabs on the beach, reef fishes and sharks in nearshore environments can have higher chances of preying on newborns . A separate study recognised a devastating impact of light pollution on clownfish, where no eggs hatched in the presence of artificial light at night (ALAN) resulting in reproductive failure.

Insects are also one of the most light-sensitive animals as evidence showed that ALAN affects a wide range of behaviour of insects including development, movement, foraging and reproductive success. Study compared the impact of streetlight with an artificially lit and unlit environment. Populations of the studied moth and caterpillar in two botanic environments were reduced by 33 % to 47%. It is also found that white light LEDs may have greater adverse impact than traditional sodium lamps, which may be potentially due to the wider light spectrum in LEDs. Artificial light in the natural environment may even interfere with ecological interactions among animals such as bats and insects. Most bats species exhibit light avoidance behaviour and some insect species are attracted to the light, which therefore changes bat’s foraging behaviour and predation risk of the prey.

Apart from wild animals, humans are found to be also vulnerable to light pollution. Light suppresses the secretion of melatonin, which is an essential hormone determining human’s circadian rhythms, also known as the biological clock. Nocturnal light exposure interferes with vital physiological processes including hormone secretion, cellular function as well as gene expression, which corresponds to greater risk of developing certain types of cancers and disease such as metabolic and mood disorders. On top of that, a study discovered that exposure to outdoor night-time light is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease. Given that city dwellers living in highly urbanised areas are more likely to be exposed to high levels of PM2.5 and nighttime traffic noise impact, added health risk is also observed in a combination of these three environmental hazards. 

You might also like: 15 Biggest Environmental Problems Of 2024

What Steps Could be Taken to Prevent Light Pollution?

Illumination at night serves a wide range purposes for living and even safety purposes, especially for night traffic, therefore it is practicable to remove all lights at nighttime. 

A guideline published by the Institutional of Lighting Professionals (ILP) helps lighting designers to reduce the amount of obtrusive light to the neighbourhood environment, which is embedded in green building certifications such as BREEAM in the UK and BEAM Plus in Hong Kong. The guideline defines the obtrusive light standards based on the Environmental Zones, where the zoning depends on the level of urbanisation of the site surroundings. More stringent requirements are imposed on regions originally with less brightness as well as in the Curfew period, where a further limitation is applied for late night (i.e. 11pm). Several parameters are also considered including upward light ratio for determining skyglow, light intrusion into windows, luminaire intensity estimating the light that lit outside the site, as well as building luminance providing a general picture of the district brightness. 

Green building design also promotes daylight access in an indoor built environment, which reduces the amount of lighting and is beneficial to both human health and economy. A study demonstrated that daylight helps cognitive performance and satisfaction which in turn enhance worker’s productivity and helps reduce lighting energy consumption.

Artificial light is undoubtedly one of the greatest inventions in human history. It plays an irreplaceable role for humanity’s economy, living and even aesthetic purposes. Given the increasing number of evidences demonstrating the adverse impact of light pollution, it is time for policymakers to implement measures for regulating artificial light for further deteriorating human health and the natural environment. 

About the Author

Fast Fashion and Its Environmental Impact

10 Companies Called Out For Greenwashing

10 Concerning Fast Fashion Waste Statistics

Hand-picked stories weekly or monthly. We promise, no spam!

Boost this article By donating us $100, $50 or subscribe to Boosting $10/month – we can get this article and others in front of tens of thousands of specially targeted readers. This targeted Boosting – helps us to reach wider audiences – aiming to convince the unconvinced, to inform the uninformed, to enlighten the dogmatic.

Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.

We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.

Brief introduction to this section that descibes Open Access especially from an IntechOpen perspective

Want to get in touch? Contact our London head office or media team here

Our team is growing all the time, so we’re always on the lookout for smart people who want to help us reshape the world of scientific publishing.

Home > Books > Light Pollution, Urbanization and Ecology

Introductory Chapter: Ecological Effects of Light Pollution - A Review

Submitted: 09 July 2021 Published: 30 March 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99648

Cite this chapter

There are two ways to cite this chapter:

From the Edited Volume

Light Pollution, Urbanization and Ecology

Edited by Levente Hufnagel

To purchase hard copies of this book, please contact the representative in India: CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. www.cbspd.com | [email protected]

Chapter metrics overview

239 Chapter Downloads

Impact of this chapter

Total Chapter Downloads on intechopen.com

Total Chapter Views on intechopen.com

Author Information

Levente hufnagel *.

• Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Ecotheology, John Wesley Theological College, Hungary

Ferenc Mics

• Department of Environmental Security, John Wesley Theological College, Hungary

*Address all correspondence to: [email protected]

1. Introduction

Ecologists have long studied the regulatory role of natural light in species interactions, but the effect of overnight electrical lighting was only recently studied. In the 20th century, the size of the area illuminated by artificial light and the intensity of the light increased rapidly, as did its impact on wild species, however, light trapping has also become important in scientific research [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. A distinction is made between astronomical light pollution, which obscures a clear night sky, and ecological light pollution, which modifies the natural light conditions of the environment. Adverse effects have been observed in a number of taxonomic groups, such as the extinction of migratory birds due to high, illuminated structures, or the orientation of hatching sea turtles is also disturbed by the light of surrounding settlements. The impact of artificial night light on animals is a new challenge for researchers and conservationists. Mankind has been looking for opportunities since prehistoric times to make the days longer and to be able to orientate themselves at night. In the pre-industrial era, they were able to be active in the dark by lighting wood or oil. The impact of this on wildlife was still very limited. After the discovery and spread of the electricity, it has changed natural day and night light conditions in an increasing part of the planet. The term light pollution has been used for years, but not in an ecological sense, but in the sense that celestial bodies are harder to observe because of the light from the lamps. The combined effect of many millions of terrestrial light sources causes the “skyglow” phenomenon, making the stars less visible to the human eye. We will continue to addres light pollution in ecological term, which affects the behavior of living things. Large areas are lit unnecessarily, which is a great waste. In the US alone, 3600 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity was produced in worth of 362 billion USD in 2018 [ 5 ]. About 30% of outdoor lighting is a waste because it is turned on even when it is not needed or is not directed to where it needs to be [ 6 ]. Verheijen [ 7 ] wrote about this phenomenon as “photopollution” first, suggesting that artificial light has a detrimental effect on wildlife. This embraces unusual light intensities and unexpected fluctuations. The source of light pollution is the phenomenon of “nightglow”, illuminated buildings, towers, street lighting, vehicles, oil rigs. They are all, more or less, disrupting the normal functioning of ecosystems, almost all over the planet today [ 8 ]. This harmful effect of anthropogenic activity on the ecosystem occurs almost everywhere on the inhabited continents, the only exception is Antarctica [ 9 ]. The highest light pollution is observed in temperate forests and the Mediterranean climate zones. The effect is least intensive in the Arctic tundra and alpine areas [ 10 ]. In the tropics, wildlife is particularly severely affected, as the length of the illuminated period varies little during the year [ 11 ]. In tropical zone, the species have evolved over the course of evolution to vary the length of days only minimally seasonally. Species living in the temperate zone have adapted to seasonal changes in the length of the day, which is also disturbed by artificial lighting and, through this, the behavior of the animals. At full moon the illumination is between 0.1–0.03 cd/m 2 and at new moon it is between 0.01–0.003 cd/m 2 , in case there is no light pollution [ 12 ]. Significant deviation from this values affects the physiology and behavior of both plants and animals, as well as the functioning of the entire ecosystem.

2. Light and ecology

Measuring the intensity and cycle of natural light is the first step in being able to determine the extent of pollution at a given location. The intensity, spectrum and period of the light may vary. Ecologists ideally measure the amount of photons per unit area per second. More often, however, light intensity is measured in lux, which expresses the intensity of light perceived by the human eye. In this case, the visible light to the human eye is measured primarily and less emphasis is placed on the invisible range. Since many animal can perceive light of a different wavelength than humans, it is worth measuring a wider range, because wavelengths out of range sensible to human eye can affect affect the behavior of animals [ 13 ]. The instruments are designated to be most sensitive in range that can be perceived by human eye, which makes the measurement more complicated [ 14 ]. For example, a light source may emit UV light that is not perceptible to the human eye, but some animals are attracted to UV source [ 15 ]. Orientation and disorientation are responses to changes in external lighting. Attraction and repulsion, on the other hand, are a response to the light source itself and its luminance [ 16 , 17 ]. Increased illumination prolongs the activity of species active during the day, or at dusk, because they are still able to orientate. Many diurnal species continue to forage by artificial light [ 18 ]. Therefore, the so-called “night light niche” have developed in cities, which is very beneficial to certain species as they can seek food for longer periods of time. This is, of course, detrimental to their prey species [ 19 ]. In the case of birds, territorial behavior, i.e. singing, also takes longer due to artificial light [ 20 ]. Continuous artificial lighting, however, causes disorientation in nocturnal animals. The best-known example is the disrupted migration of sea turtle hatchlings to the water They normally move away from the low, dark silhouttes, which is generally the surrounding vegetation, to reach the water as quickly as possible. Due to the light of the surrounding settlements, the plants have no shade or the direction of the shade changes. This confuses the little turtles and they loose direction. Females, preparing to lay eggs, can also be disturbed by the light from the villages [ 21 ]. Nocturnal animals have adapted to low light intensity, and they can be blinded by sudden strong light, making them disoriented. In some cases, the adaptation of the eye can take up to hours, during which the animal loses its ability to orient itself [ 22 ]. In the case of birds, the light source sometimes traps the animals, they do not leave the surrounds of illuminated structures. Birds may collide with each other, the lit-up building, or fall prey to predators [ 23 ]. In the case of insects, many taxa are known to be attracted to night light. Such as moths, veils, beetles, bugs, quails, mosquitoes, flies, buzzards, wasps and crickets. Attraction depends on the spectrum of light emitted [ 24 ]. In the case of non-flying arthropods, the reaction can be varied. Nocturnal species are often repelled by night light, trying to move away from it. Others prefer to take advantage of artificial light [ 25 ]. Some insects always show positive phototaxis as adaptive behavior, while others always show negative [ 26 , 27 ]. In some cases, phototaxis can be exploited to protect animals. For example, in the case of the American eel ( A. rostrata ), animals can be diverted to a detour route if a dam or power plant on the river prevents the migration [ 28 ].

Artificial light also affects reproduction. The calling sound of male frogs ( Physalaemus pustulosus ) changes around urban cities without increasing the risk of predation, as there are fewer predators due to light. For this reason, their reproduction is also more successful than in the case of individuals living far from the city [ 29 ]. The reproductive success of birds is also affected by artificial lighting, but here the effect is more negative. The brooding birds are disturbed in their sleep, resulting in a significant reduction in reproductive success [ 30 ]. Visual communication, both within and between species, is strongly influenced by the light of the lamps. Some animals use the chemical reaction of bioluminescence for communication. The best known example of this is the fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Due to the unnatural light intensity, their signals are less noticeable, so they are less able to make contact with their peers, and their chances of reproduction also deteriorate [ 31 ]. The coyote ( Canis latrans ) holds the team together at night with vocals and also signals the boundary of the territory with its voice. Due to the light of the settlements, the pattern of vocalization changes, it is most pronounced in the new moon, when it is otherwise darkest at night [ 32 ]. Vision plays a very important role in orientation, no wonder the changed light conditions also affect the behavior of the animals. This should also be taken into account in nature conservation, as some species may decline as a result of light pollution. For other species, the effect is positive, but from the point of view of community ecology, this effect may not be positive. The connection between the Physalaemus pustulosus frog and Corethrella spp. parasite midges is also affected by the lights of the lamps. The parasite is very sensitive to light pollution, so significantly fewer parasites can be observed near the settlements. The relationship between the parasite and the host species is further complicated by the fact that noise pollution also affects the abundance of the parasite [ 33 ]. A frog called Hyla squirrela feeds in the range of 10–5 lux and ceases to feed above 10–3 lux [ 34 ]. Bufo boreas feeds between 10 and 1 and 10–5 lux, while Ascaphus truei only feeds below 10–5 lux [ 35 ]. These species are not sympatric, they live in same area, niche separation occurs along the gradient of illumination, hence interspecific competition increases under the influence of artificial light. It is a well-known fact that the light of street lights attracts flying insects and insects attract bats [ 36 ]. But not all bats are attracted to light. How attractive a particular species finds the abundance of food provided by a lamp depends primarily on how fast it can fly. Slower-flying species are less likely to come to illuminated places because they have to compete with faster species there, and despite the increased food density, they would not be able to take more prey. Therefore, they prefer to avoid light and hunt in the dark [ 37 ]. So in competing communities, changed light conditions also change interspecific relationships. Some species benefit from a longer clear period because they can search for food for a longer period of time, but this also has disadvantages because predation risk also increases during food search [ 38 ]. Strong lighting makes rats more cautious, spends little time in the illuminated area, and their movement is also slowed near lamps, and the time spent searching for food is shortened [ 39 ]. During a full moon, the predation of marine zooplankton by fish increases because plankton congregate near the surface due to illumination. Due to artificial lighting, this event has become commonplace, greatly increasing the predation pressure from which fish benefit [ 40 ]. Yurk and Trites [ 41 ] observed that the hunting success of seals ( Phoca vitulina ) is significantly enhanced by coastal lights. So at the next trophic level, the proximity of settlements also increases the efficiency of hunting. But there is an counter-example. Indian peafowl ( Pavo cristatus ) becomes more alert and sleeps less when exposed to artificial light. This just reduces predation risk [ 42 ]. Species belonging to the families Geometridae, Noctuidae, and Notodontidae families have sensory organs that detect ultrasound and try to evade bats. Conversly, by the light of mercury vapor lamp they does not exhibit evasive behavior. They do not seem to respond to ultrasound in the area lit by mercury vapor lamp. They do not also react to ultrasound flying in natural daylight. They detect ultrasound during the day, but then the source of the sound does not pose a threat to them, because in light they mostly perceive the sound emitted by Orthoptera species, which does not pose a threat to them. The light of mercury vapor lamp is interpreted by the animals ‘nervous system as natural daylight and there is no danger of predation by bats. Therefore, they do not even try to avoid the source of ultrasound, significantly increasing the mortality rate and bat hunting success. It appears that in the light of led lamps that do not emit UV light, the evasive reaction is largely retained, and in the case of led lamp light, the powerdive maneuver is more often observed [ 43 ]. Altered animal behavior, as a spillover effect, endangers the functioning of the entire ecosystem in the long run. Good example is the diurnal drift of zooplankton. Zooplankton migrates vertically in the water body in a daily rhythm. They come close to the surface at night to feed and also follow the lunar cycle. Thus, they can avoid predation risk by fish [ 44 ]. Luarte et al. [ 45 ] during the study of zooplankton and invertebrate species found that artificial lighting reduced migration, and thus the time spent feeding. As a result, the size of the population has also decreased. Due to the decrease in predation pressure, the biomass of algae increased. Returning to the bats, the species that can fly slower do not gain anything from the food abundance caused by the light of the streetlamps due to the interspecific competition with faster species ( Lasiurus spp., Eptesicus spp., Nyctalus spp. and Pipistrellus spp.) Therefore they prefer to continue hunting in the dark ( Rhinolophus spp. Plecotus spp. and Myotis spp.) This leads to changes in community structure [ 46 ].

Sunlight is one of the most important abiotic factors that regulates plant development. During evolution, they developed a wide variety of receptors for the perception of light, which are used to obtain information about the amount, quality, seasonal changes, direction, length of illumination. Luarte et al. [ 45 ] during the study of zooplankton and invertebrate species found that artificial lighting reduced migration, and thus the time spent feeding. As a result, the size of the population has also decreased. Due to the decrease in predation pressure, the biomass of algae increased. Returning to the bats, the species that can fly slower do not gain anything from the food abundance caused by the light of the streetlamps due to the interspecific competition with faster species ( Lasiurus spp., Eptesicus spp., Nyctalus spp. and Pipistrellus spp.) Therefore they prefer to continue hunting in the dark ( Rhinolophus sp. Plecotus spp. and Myotis spp.) This leads to changes in community structure [ 46 ].

Sunlight is one of the most important abiotic factors that regulate plant development. During the evolution, many receptors have developed in them for the perception of light, with the help of which they obtain information about the amount, quality, seasonal changes, direction and length of illumination. This allows plants to adjust their biological clock and adapt life processes to optimal conditions. The mechanism that regulates the circadian rhythm is conserved and found almost throughout the kingdoms [ 47 ]. Plants utilize the energy of light during photosynthesis to produce organic matter. A wide variety of physiological processes, both light and dark, are required to coordinate regulatory processes. Light directs various plant physiological processes from seed germination to seed maturation [ 48 , 49 ]. Changes in daily, monthly, and annual cycles may result in a shift in phenological phases caused by artificial light. A good example of this is the study of Škvareninová et al. [ 50 ] who observed sycamore ( Acer pseudoplatanus ) and stag’s horn sumach ( Rhus typhina ) individuals in a park of Zvolen (Slovakia) between 2013 and 2016. On average, the autumn phenophase began 13–22 days later and lasted 6–9 days longer due to the light from the street lamps. As a result, however, they are more exposed to frost damage in late fall. French-Constant et al. [ 51 ] examined the phenology of urban trees’ spring bud bursting in the UK. The trees around the lamps ( Acer psuedoplatanus , Fagus sylvatica , Quercus robur , Fraxinus excelsior ) sprout up a week earlier than specimens away from the light source. But urban heat island also contributes to this, namely, phenomenon that the average temperature in cities is a little higher. Lamp light also affects leaf movement, stomatal condunctance, abaxial and adaxial cell elongation, cytoskeletal rearrangement, carbon dioxide uptake, hormone production and transport [ 52 ].

Another effect on plants is the reduction in the population size of pollinating insects, which is drastically decreased as a result of artificial light. Moths are important nocturnal pollinators, and due to the strong decline in their population, pollination fails often, so this indirect effect also threatens the healthy functioning of the ecosystem [ 53 ].

During the dark period, regeneration processes begin in plant cells to repair damages occur during the day. In this case, the normal physiological state is restored (Light-Independent Repair) [ 54 ]. Urban lighting makes it harder for plants to repair damage caused by oxidative stress. Ozone concentration in the air is also often high in cities due to pollution. Of course, ozone in high concentration also damages plant tissues, but the light pollution makes regeneration much more difficult for them [ 55 ]. Survival in a polluted urban environment is also made difficult for plants by abnormal lighting conditions (e.g. [ 56 ]).

• 1. Gimesi, L, Hufnagel, L. (2010): THE POSSIBILITIES OF BIODIVERSITY MONITORING BASED ON HUNGARIAN LIGHT TRAP NETWORKS - Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 8(3): 223-239
• 2. Nowinszky, L. (2004): NOCTURNAL ILLUMINATION AND NIGHT FLYING INSECTS- Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2(1): 17-52
• 3. Nowinszky, L, Puskás, J., Kúti, Zs. (2010): Light trapping as a dependent of Moonlight and clouds - Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 8(4): 301-312
• 4. Nowinszky, L, Puskás, J., Tar, K, Hufnagel, L, Ladányi, M. (2013): The dependence of normal and black light type trapping results upon the wingspan of moth species- Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 11(4): 593-610
• 5. EIA. (2018): Electric Sales, Revenue, and Average Price - Energy Information Administration. viewed on 28 january 2021. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/sales_revenue_p rice/
• 6. Tatro, K. (2020): Light Energy: Our Wasted Resource. – Consilience 22: 65-72
• 7. Verheijen, F.J. (1985): Photopollution: artificial light optic spatial control systems fail to cope with. Incidents, causations, remedies. – The Journal of Experimental Biology 44(1): 1-18
• 8. Li, X., Zhou, Y., Zhao, M. (2020): A harmonized global nighttime light dataset 1992-2018. – Scientific Data 7: 168
• 9. Bará, S., Lima, R.C., Zamorano, J. (2019): Monitoring Long-Term Trends in the Anthropogenic Night Sky Brightness. – Sustainability 11(11): 3070
• 10. Bennie, J., Duffy, J.P., Davies, T.W., Correa-Cano, M.E., Gaston, K.J. (2015): Global Trends in Exposure to Light Pollution in Natural Terrestrial Ecosystems. – Remote Sensing 7: 2715-2730
• 11. Brighenti, L.S., Staehr, P.A., Gagliardi, L.M., Brandão, L.P.M., Elias, E.C., de Mello, N.A.S.T., Barbosa, F.A.R., Bezerra-Neto, J.F. (2015): Seasonal Changes in Metabolic Rates of Two Tropical Lakes in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. – Ecosystems 18: 589-604
• 12. Sachsenweger, M., Sachsenweger, U. (2012): Stereoscopic acuity in ocular pursuit of moving objects: Dynamic stereoscopy and movement parallax: relevance to road safety and occupational medicine. – Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht
• 13. Donner, K., Zak, P., Viljanen, M., Lindström, M., Feldman, T., Ostrovsky, M. (2016): Eye spectral sensitivity in fresh- and brackish-water populations of three glacial-relict Mysis species (Crustacea): physiology and genetics of differential tuning. – Journal of Comparative physiology A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 202(4): 297-312
• 14. Schweikert, L.E., Fitak, R.R., Caves, E.M., Sutton, T.T., Johnsen, S. (2018): Spectral sensitivity in ray-finned fishes: diversity, ecology and shared descent. – Journal of Experimental Biology 221: jeb189761
• 15. Owens, A.C.S., Lewis, S.M. (2018): The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis. – Ecology and Evolution 8: 11337-11358
• 16. Gaston, K.J., Visser, M.E., Hölker, F. (2015): The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge. – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 370(1667): 20140133
• 17. Schroer, S., Hölker, F. (2016): Impact of Lighting on Flora and Fauna. – In: Karlicek, R., Sun, C.-C., Zissis, G., Ma, R. Handbook of Advanced Lighting Technology. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland
• 18. Leveau, L.M. (2020): Artificial Light at Night (ALAN) Is the Main Driver of Nocturnal Feral Pigeon ( Columba livia f. domestica ) Foraging in Urban Areas. – Animals (Basel). 10(4): 554
• 19. Zozaya, S.M., Alford, R.A., Schwarzkopf, L. (2015): Invasive house geckos are more willing to use artificial lights than are native geckos. – Austral Ecology 40(8): 982-987
• 20. Da Silva, A., Kempenaers, B. (2017): Singing from North to South: Latitudinal variation in timing of dawn singing under natural and artificial light conditions. – Journal of Animal Ecology 86(6): 1286-1297
• 21. Dimitriadis, C., Fournari-Konstantinidou, I., Sourbes, L., Koutsoubas, D., Mazaris, A.D. (2017): Reduction of sea turtle population recruitment caused by nightlight: Evidence from the Mediterranean region. – Ocean & Coastal Management 153: 108-115
• 22. Contín, M.A., Benedetto, M.M., Quinteros-Quintana, M.L., Guido, M.E. (2016): Light pollution: the possible consequences of excessive illumination on retina. – Eye 30(2): 255-263
• 23. Ronconi, R.A., Allard, K.A., Taylor, P.D. (2015): Bird interactions with offshore oil and gas platforms: Review of impacts and monitoring techniques. – Journal of Environmental Management 147: 34-45
• 24. Barroso, A., Haifig, I., Janei, V., da Silva, I., Dietrich, C., Costa-Leonardo, A.M. (2015): Effects of flickering light on the attraction of nocturnal insects. – Lighting Research & Technology 49(1): 1-11
• 25. Gomes, D.G.E. (2020): Orb-weaving spiders are fewer but larger and catch more prey in lit bridge panels from a natural artificial light experiment. – PeerJ 8:e8808
• 26. Okland, B. (2002): Canopy cover favours sporocarp-visiting beetles in spruce forest. – Norwegian Journal of Entomology 49: 29-39
• 27. Shimoda, M., Honda, K. (2013): Insect reactions to light and its applications to pest management. – Applied Entomology and Zoology 48(4)
• 28. Elvidge, C.K., Ford, M.I., Pratt, T.C., Smokorowski, K.E., Sills, Patrick, P.H., Cooke, S.J. (2018): Behavioural guidance of yellow-stage American eel Anguilla rostrata with a light-emitting diode device. – Endangered Species Research 35: 159-168
• 29. Halfwerk, W., Blaas, M., Kramer, L., Hijner, N., Trillo, P.A., Bernal, X.E., Page, R.A., Goutte, S., Ryan, M.J., Ellers, J. (2019): Adaptive changes in sexual signalling in response to urbanization. – Nature Ecology & Evolution 3: 374-380
• 30. Raap, T. (2018): Effects of artificial light at night on the behaviour and physiology of free-living songbirds. – PhD thesis, University of Antwerpen, Belgium
• 31. Lewis, S.M., Wong, C.H., Owens, A.C.S., Fallon, C., Jepsen, S., Thancharoen, A., Wu, C., De Cock, R., Novák, M., López-Palafox, T., Khoo, V., Reed, J.M. (2020): A Global Perspective on Firefly Extinction Threats. – BioScience 70(2): 157-167
• 32. Birnie-Gauvin, K., Peiman, K.S., Gallagher, A.J., de Bruijn, R., Cooke, S.J. (2016): Sublethal consequences of urban life for wild vertebrates. – Environmental Reviews 24(4): 416-425
• 33. McMahon, T.A., Rohr, J.R., Bernal, X.E. (2017): Light and noise pollution interact to disrupt interspecific interactions. – Ecology 98(5): 1290-1299
• 34. Buchanan, B.W. (1998): Low-illumination prey detection by squirrel treefrogs. – Journal of Herpetology 32: 270-274
• 35. Hailman, J.P. (1984): Bimodal nocturnal activity of the western toad ( Bufo boreas ) in relation to ambient illumination. – Copeia 1984: 283-290
• 36. Plummer, K., Hale, J., O'Callaghan, M., Sadler, J., Siriwardeni, G. (2016): Investigating the impact of street lighting changes on garden moth communities. – Journal of Urban Ecology 2(1): juw004
• 37. Stone, E.L., Harris, S., Jones, G. (2015): Impacts of artificial lighting on bats: a review of challenges and solutions. – Mammalian Biology 80: 213-219
• 38. Bennie, J., Davies, T.W., Cruse, D., Inger, R., Gaston, K.J. (2015): Cascading effects of artificial light at night: resource-mediated control of herbivores in a grassland ecosystem. – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370: 20140131
• 39. Farnworth, B., Meitern, R., Innes, J., Waas, J.R. (2019): Increasing predation risk with light reduces speed, exploration and visit duration of invasive ship rats ( Rattus rattus ). – Scientific Reports 9: 3739
• 40. Berge, J., Geoffroy, M., Daase, M., Cottier, F., Priou, P., Cohen, J.H., Johnsen, G., McKee, D., Kostakis, I., Renaud, P.E., Vogedes, D., Anderson, Last, K.S., Gauthier, S. (2020): Artificial light during the polar night disrupts Arctic fish and zooplankton behaviour down to 200 m depth. – Communications Biology 3: 102
• 41. Yurk, H., Trites, A.W. (2000): Experimental attempts to reduce predation by harbor seals on out-migrating juvenile salmonids. – Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 1360-1366
• 42. Yorzinski​, J.L., Chisholm, S., Byerley, S.D., Coy, J.R., Aziz, A., Wolf, J.A., Gnerlich, A.C. (2015): Artificial light pollution increases nocturnal vigilance in peahens. – PeerJ 3:e1174
• 43. Wakefield, A., Stone, E.L., Jones, G., Harris, S. (2015): Light-emitting diode street lights reduce last-ditch evasive manoeuvres by moths to bat echolocation calls. – Royal Society Open Science 2: 150291
• 44. Last, K.S., Hobbs, Berge, J., Brierley, A.S., Cottier, F. (2016): Moonlight Drives Ocean-Scale Mass Vertical Migration of Zooplankton during the Arctic Winter. – Current Biology 26: 1-8
• 45. Luarte, T., Bonta, C.C., Silva-Rodriguez, E.A., Quijon, P.A. Miranda, C., Farias, A.A., Duarte, C. (2016): Light pollution reduces activity, food consumption and growth rates in a sandy beach invertebrate. – Environmental Pollution 218: 1147-1153
• 46. Mathews, F., Roche, N., Aughney, T., Jones, N., Day, J., Baker, J., Langton, S. (2015): Barriers and benefits: implications of artificial night-lighting for the distribution of common bats in Britain and Ireland. – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370: 20140124
• 47. Andreani, T.S., Itoh, T.Q., Yildirim, E., Hwangbo, D.S., Allada, R. (2015): Genetics of circadian rhythms. – Sleep Medicine Clinics 10(4): 413-421
• 48. Sreenivasulu, N. (2017): Systems biology of seeds: deciphering the molecular mechanisms of seed storage, dormancy and onset of germination. – Plant Cell Reports 36(5): 633-635
• 49. van Gelderen, K., Kang, C., Pierik, R. (2017): Light Signaling, Root Development, and Plasticity. – Plant Physiology 176: 1049-1060
• 50. Škvareninová, J., Tuhárska, M., Škvarenina, J., Babálová, D., Slobodníková, L., Slobodník, B., Středová, H., Minďaš, J. (2017): Effects of light pollution on tree phenology in the urban environment. – Moravian Geographical Reports 25(4): 282-290
• 51. French-Constant, R.H., Somers-Yeates, R., Bennie, J., Economou, T., Hodgson, D., Spalding, A., McGregor, P.K. (2016): Light pollution is associated with earlier tree budburst across the United Kingdom. – Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283(1833): 20160813
• 52. Roni, Z.K., Islam, S., Shimasaki , K. (2017): Response of Eustoma Leaf Phenotype and Photosynthetic Performance to LED Light Quality. – Horticulturae 3(4): 50
• 53. MacGregor, C.J., Pocock, M.J.O., Fox, R., Evans, D.M. (2015): Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review. – Ecological Entomology 40(3): 187-198
• 54. Gill, S.S., Anjum, N.A., Gill, R., Jha, M., Tuteja, N. (2015): DNA Damage and Repair in Plants under Ultraviolet and Ionizing Radiations. – The Scientific World Journal Article ID 250158
• 55. Meravi, N., Prajapati, S.K. (2018): Effect street light pollution on the photosynthetic efficiency of different plants. – Biological Rhythm Research 51(1): 67-75
• 56. Yang, J, Duan, R. (2019): The effect of artificial illumination on postponing plant phenology – Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17(6):13289-13296

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

Published: 30 March 2022

By Rekha Sodani, Udit Nandan Mishra, Subhash Chand, ...

551 downloads

By László Nowinszky, Lionel Hill, János Puskás, Károl...

188 downloads

By Redhwan Al-Naggar and Lutfi Al-Maktari

359 downloads

Light pollution: A review of the scientific literature

Light pollution is the consequence of elevated lighting emitted by human-made artefacts to the lower atmosphere. Recently, there have been major advances in the assessment and mitigation of light pollution impacts on humans and the natural ecosystems. Severe negative impacts of light pollution have been highlighted while very few mitigation measures have been implemented. People (scientists, policymakers or stakeholders) interested in light pollution may not have a holistic perspective of the problem, and also there is a need for incorporating social and natural dimensions. Therefore, the main goal of this paper is to review the literature on light pollution using ISI Web of Science by paying attention to the (i) type of publication, year and journal; (ii) impacts on specific elements; (iii) location and (iv) methods used. Our results indicated that the elevated number of papers come from a diverse range of disciplines, methods, places and scales. It is clear that light pollution is getting enough attention from the scientific community but decisions on the implementation of mitigation measures are left with the stakeholders, ordinary inhabitants, policymakers and politicians. Nevertheless, light pollution is having impacts on the health of humans and the natural ecosystem as perceived by experts and inhabitants having divergent perspectives. Thus, light pollution is multifaceted but difficult to be faced, mitigated and not holistically understood. This review paper groups the total impacts of light pollution on the Earth presents some contradictory results, summarises mitigation measures, and provides specific future research directions.

• Related Documents

The Use of Embedded Context-Sensitive Attractors for Clinical Walking Test Guidance in Virtual Reality

Virtual reality is increasingly used in rehabilitation and can provide additional motivation when working toward therapeutic goals. However, a particular problem for patients regards their ability to plan routes in unfamiliar environments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how visual cues, namely embedded context-sensitive attractors, can guide attention and walking direction in VR, for clinical walking interventions. This study was designed using a butterfly as the embedded context-sensitive attractor, to guide participant locomotion around the clinical figure of eight walk test, to limit the use of verbal instructions. We investigated the effect of varying the number of attractors for figure of eight path following, and whether there are any negative impacts on perceived autonomy or workload. A total of 24 participants took part in the study and completed six attractor conditions in a counterbalanced order. They also experienced a control VE (no attractors) at the beginning and end of the protocol. Each VE condition lasted a duration of 1 min and manipulated the number of attractors to either singular or multiple alongside, the placement of turning markers (virtual trees) used to represent the cones used in clinical settings for the figure of eight walk test. Results suggested that embedded context-sensitive attractors can be used to guide walking direction, following a figure of eight in VR without impacting perceived autonomy, and workload. However, there appears to be a saturation point, with regards to effectiveness of attractors. Too few objects in a VE may reduce feelings of intrinsic motivation, and too many objects in a VE may reduce the effectiveness of attractors for guiding individuals along a figure of eight path. We conclude by indicating future research directions, for attractors and their use as a guide for walking direction.

Comprehensive Evaluation of Photovoltaic Solar Plants vs. Natural Ecosystems in Green Conflict Situations

This study aims to develop a comprehensive method for evaluating the environmental cost/benefits of photovoltaic (PV) solar plant installation versus conserving natural ecosystems. First, the positive and negative impacts of installing PV solar plants in regions with natural ecosystems are reviewed. For focus and quantification, climate change mitigation and economic benefit were considered as benefits, and the loss of carbon sinks and biodiversity as well as disaster risk were considered as negatives. These items were also integrated as external costs using a life-cycle assessment method, and a ratio of positive versus negative impacts (P/N ratio) was developed, as part of our evaluation. The method was applied to a case study in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan, where 361 large PV solar plants have been installed in areas that previously supported natural ecosystems. Prior to the PV installation, 25.5% of the plants were cleared from the natural ecosystem. Consequently, the annualized benefits (costs) for these Hyogo plants were estimated to be 101.16 (73.88) million USD, which yielded a P/N ratio of 1.37, indicating that their benefits outweighed their costs. An economic benefit was found to be one of the parameters that significantly influenced the P/N ratio.

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Automation, Robotics, Future of Work and Future of Humanity

The exponential advancement in artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, robotics, and automation are rapidly transforming industries and societies across the world. The way we work, the way we live, and the way we interact with others are expected to be transformed at a speed and scale beyond anything we have observed in human history. This new industrial revolution is expected, on one hand, to enhance and improve our lives and societies. On the other hand, it has the potential to cause major upheavals in our way of life and our societal norms. The window of opportunity to understand the impact of these technologies and to preempt their negative effects is closing rapidly. Humanity needs to be proactive, rather than reactive, in managing this new industrial revolution. This article looks at the promises, challenges, and future research directions of these transformative technologies. Not only are the technological aspects investigated, but behavioral, societal, policy, and governance issues are reviewed as well. This research contributes to the ongoing discussions and debates about AI, automation, machine learning, and robotics. It is hoped that this article will heighten awareness of the importance of understanding these disruptive technologies as a basis for formulating policies and regulations that can maximize the benefits of these advancements for humanity and, at the same time, curtail potential dangers and negative impacts.

Understanding ENSO Diversity

Abstract El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a naturally occurring mode of tropical Pacific variability, with global impacts on society and natural ecosystems. While it has long been known that El Niño events display a diverse range of amplitudes, triggers, spatial patterns, and life cycles, the realization that ENSO’s impacts can be highly sensitive to this event-to-event diversity is driving a renewed interest in the subject. This paper surveys our current state of knowledge of ENSO diversity, identifies key gaps in understanding, and outlines some promising future research directions.

Sustainability for competitiveness in firms – a systematic literature review

Purpose This paper aims to present a systematic review of the literature on sustainability for the competitiveness of firms to identify the state of the art, significant discussions and new research directions. Recently, due to the negative impacts that traditional and unsustainable practices of companies have caused the Planet (e.g. climate change, sanitary crisis), national and international research urgently calls for the assessment of sustainable practices in firms. However, progress seems slow due to a poor understanding of the necessary changes that companies must make in their specific reality. Competitiveness has remained as firms’ primary strategy to endure. Some have associated sustainability with an increment of costs, sometimes with a negative impact on its competitiveness. Sometimes generating oppositions from stakeholder and institutions regulations, it is important to explore how these behaviors and dynamics of this relationship between sustainability and competitiveness affect the pursued transition to sustainability. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review of the literature, which is a scientific tool, is used in this research. It allows reliably and accurately analyzing and constructing conclusions from a broad database. The search was leaked over the 10 years, from 2010 to 2019. As a basis, 182 scientific articles were identified and revised based on methodology selection criteria and 51 articles were revised in detail. Findings This paper identifies critical variables analyzed in the selected articles, sustainability strategies for competitiveness, strategies for sustainability, organizational aspects for sustainability and competitiveness, measurement of sustainability, models, moderating factors for sustainability and new future research directions. Originality/value This paper presents state of art about sustainability for competitiveness and identifying key themes and future research directions.

City Light or Star Bright: A Review of Urban Light Pollution, Impacts, and Planning Implications

Light pollution (LP) is a growing scourge in metropolitan areas yet is largely ignored by planners. It has negative impacts on the health of humans and of wildlife and threatens views of the night sky. This article reviews adverse impacts in multiple categories, highlights mitigation strategies, and makes the case for more engagement in planning scholarship and practice especially in the United States. Defining LP and balancing competing values in its mitigation are political acts, challenged by, among other things, lack of public awareness, the primacy of energy efficiency among factors in decision-making, and the association of more light with greater security.

Ostracizing targets of workplace sexual harassment before and after the #MeToo movement

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the connections between sexual harassment and ostracism both before and after the modern day #MeToo movement. It outlines how the birth of the #MeToo movement lessened the impact of ostracism, empowering victims to report their abusers. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides an overview of the ostracism literature, and discusses why ostracism has historically prevented individuals from disclosing workplace abuse. It also examines recent and historical cases of sexual harassment where ostracism has both inhibited targets of sexual harassment from reporting and harmed those who stood up for their right not to be harassed. Findings Both purposeful and non-purposeful ostracism have negative impacts on employees and organizations as a whole, and the fear of ostracism prevented many from disclosing harassment and abuse in the workplace. The #MeToo movement, by nature, is antithetical to ostracism by building community and freeing people to seek justice. This paper makes practical recommendations for organizations that wish to help prevent ostracism as a response to workplace sexual harassment disclosure. Research limitations/implications Both purposeful and non-purposeful ostracism have negative impacts on employees and organizations as a whole, and the fear of ostracism prevent many from disclosing harassment and abuse in the workplace. The #MeToo movement by nature is antithetical to ostracism, building community and freeing people to seek justice. This paper makes practical recommendations for organizations that wish to prevent ostracism as a response to workplace sexual harassment disclosure. Additionally, it provides future research directions to explore the empirical link between the disclosure of sexual harassment and ostracism. Originality/value This paper analyzes a crucial barrier to reporting sexual harassment. It both examines the consequences of ostracism and highlights how the threat of ostracism can be overcome through intentional organizational efforts.

Toward a Pluralistic Conception of Resilience

The concept of resilience occupies an increasingly prominent position within contemporary efforts to confront many of modernity's most pressing challenges, including global environmental change, famine, infrastructure, poverty, and terrorism, to name but a few. Received views of resilience span a broad conceptual and theoretical terrain, with a diverse range of application domains and settings. In this paper, we identify several foundational tenets --- dealing primarily with intent/intentionality and uncertainty --- that are seen to underlie a number of recent accounts of resilience, and we explore the implications of these tenets for ongoing attempts to articulate the rudiments of an overarching resilience paradigm. Firstly, we explore the complemental nature of risk and resilience, looking, initially, at the role that linearity assumptions play in numerous resilience frameworks found in the literature. We then explore the limitations of these assumptions for efforts directed at modeling risk and resilience in complex domains. These discussions are then used to motivate a pluralistic conception of resilience, drawing inspiration and content from a broad range of sources and empirical domains, including information, network, and decision theories. Secondly, we sketch the rudiments of a framework for engineered resilience, the primary focus of which is the exploration of the fundamental challenges that system design and system performance pose for resilience managers. The conception of engineered resilience set forth here also considers how challenges concerning time and predictability should factor explicitly into the formal schemes that are used to represent and model resilience. Finally, we conclude with a summary of our findings, and we provide a brief sketch of possible future research directions.

Biomechanics of oral implants: future research directions

School consultation research: methodological critique and future research directions, export citation format, share document.