deed of assignment vs contract

Deed of Assignment: Everything You Need to Know

A deed of assignment refers to a legal document that records the transfer of ownership of a real estate property from one party to another. 3 min read updated on January 01, 2024

Updated October 8,2020:

A deed of assignment refers to a legal document that records the transfer of ownership of a real estate property from one party to another. It states that a specific piece of property will belong to the assignee and no longer belong to the assignor starting from a specified date. In order to be valid, a deed of assignment must contain certain types of information and meet a number of requirements.

What Is an Assignment?

An assignment is similar to an outright transfer, but it is slightly different. It takes place when one of two parties who have entered into a contract decides to transfer all of his or her rights and obligations to a third party and completely remove himself or herself from the contract.

Also called the assignee, the third party effectively replaces the former contracting party and consequently assumes all of his or her rights and obligations. Unless it is stated in the original contract, both parties to the initial contract are typically required to express approval of an assignment before it can occur. When you sell a piece of property, you are making an assignment of it to the buyer through the paperwork you sign at closing.

What Is a Deed of Assignment?

A deed of assignment refers to a legal document that facilitates the legal transfer of ownership of real estate property. It is an important document that must be securely stored at all times, especially in the case of real estate.

In general, this document can be described as a document that is drafted and signed to promise or guarantee the transfer of ownership of a real estate property on a specified date. In other words, it serves as the evidence of the transfer of ownership of the property, with the stipulation that there is a certain timeframe in which actual ownership will begin.

The deed of assignment is the main document between the seller and buyer that proves ownership in favor of the seller. The party who is transferring his or her rights to the property is known as the “assignor,” while the party who is receiving the rights is called the “assignee.”

A deed of assignment is required in many different situations, the most common of which is the transfer of ownership of a property. For example, a developer of a new house has to sign a deed of assignment with a buyer, stating that the house will belong to him or her on a certain date. Nevertheless, the buyer may want to sell the house to someone else in the future, which will also require the signing of a deed of assignment.

This document is necessary because it serves as a temporary title deed in the event that the actual title deed for the house has not been issued. For every piece of property that will be sold before the issuance of a title deed, a deed of assignment will be required.

Requirements for a Deed of Assignment

In order to be legally enforceable, an absolute sale deed must provide a clear description of the property being transferred, such as its address or other information that distinguishes it from other properties. In addition, it must clearly identify the buyer and seller and state the date when the transfer will become legally effective, the purchase price, and other relevant information.

In today's real estate transactions, contracting parties usually use an ancillary real estate sale contract in an attempt to cram all the required information into a deed. Nonetheless, the information found in the contract must be referenced by the deed.

Information to Include in a Deed of Assignment

• Names of parties to the agreement
• Addresses of the parties and how they are binding on the parties' successors, friends, and other people who represent them in any capacity
• History of the property being transferred, from the time it was first acquired to the time it is about to be sold
• Agreed price of the property
• Size and description of the property
• Promises or covenants the parties will undertake to execute the deed
• Signatures of the parties
• Section for the Governors Consent or Commissioner of Oaths to sign and verify the agreement

If you need help understanding, drafting, or signing a deed of assignment, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

• Define a Deed
• Contract for Deed California
• Contract for Deed in Texas
• Assignment Law
• Deed Contract Agreement
• Assignment Of Contracts
• Legal Assignment
• Deed vs Agreement
• Assignment Legal Definition
• Contract for a Deed

• Building and Construction Law
• Commercial and Business Law
• Planning and Environment
• Sydney CBD and Greater Sydney

Deed of Assignment or Deed of Novation: Key Differences and Legal Implications of Novation and Assignment Contracts

Call: 02 9994 0345, speak to a lawyer today.

• March 13, 2024
• Building and Construction Contracts , Building and Construction Law , Commercial and Business Case Law and Legislation

Novation and assignment stand out as pivotal processes for the transfer of contractual rights and obligations. These legal concepts allow a party to the contract to adapt to changing circumstances, ensuring that business arrangements remain relevant and effective. This article explores the nuances of novation and assignment, shedding light on their distinct legal implications, procedures, and practical applications. Whether you’re a business owner navigating the transfer of service contracts, or an individual looking to understand your rights and responsibilities in a contractual relationship, or a key stakeholder in a construction contract, this guide will equip you with the essential knowledge to navigate these complex legal processes.

Table of Contents

• What is a Deed of Novation? 
• What is a Deed of Assignment? 

Key Differences Between Novation and Assignment Deeds

Need a deed of novation or assignment key factors to consider, selecting the right assignment clause for your contract – helping you make the right choice, what is a deed of novation.

Novation is a legal process that allows a new party to a contract to take the place of an original party in a contract, thereby transferring both the responsibilities and benefits under the contract to a third party. In common law, transferring contractual obligations through novation requires the agreement of all original parties involved in the contract, as well as the new party. This is because novation effectively terminates the original contract and establishes a new one.

A novation clause typically specifies that a contract cannot be novated without the written consent of the current parties. The inclusion of such a clause aims to preclude the possibility of novation based on verbal consent or inferred from the actions of a continuing party. Nevertheless, courts will assess the actual events that transpired, and a novation clause may not always be enforceable. It’s possible for a novation clause to allow for future novation by one party acting alone to a party of their choosing. Courts will enforce a novation carried out in this manner if it is sanctioned by the correct interpretation of the original contract.

Novation is frequently encountered in business and contract law, offering a means for parties to transfer their contractual rights and duties to another, which can be useful if the original party cannot meet their obligations or wishes to transfer their contract rights. For novation to occur, there must be unanimous consent for the substitution of the new party for the original one, necessitating a three-way agreement among the original party, the new party, and the remaining contract party. Moreover, the novation agreement must be documented in writing and signed by all involved parties. Understanding novation is essential in the realms of contracts and business dealings, as it provides a way for parties to delegate their contractual rights and responsibilities while freeing themselves from the original agreement.

What is a Deed of Assignment?

A deed of assignment is a legal document that facilitates the transfer of a specific right or benefit from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This process allows the assignee to step into the assignor’s position, taking over both the rights and obligations under the original contract. In construction, this might occur when a main contractor assigns rights under a subcontract to the employer, allowing the employer to enforce specific subcontractor duties directly if the contractor fails.

Key aspects of an assignment include:

• Continuation of the Original Contract: The initial agreement remains valid and enforceable, despite the transfer of rights or benefits.
• Assumption of Rights and Obligations: The assignee assumes the role of the assignor, adopting all associated rights and responsibilities as outlined in the original contract.
• Requirement for Written Form: The assignment must be documented in writing, signed by the assignor, and officially communicated to the obligor (the party obligated under the contract).
• Subject to Terms and Law: The ability to assign rights or benefits is governed by the specific terms of the contract and relevant legal statutes.

At common law, parties generally have the right to assign their contractual rights without needing consent from the other party involved in the contract. However, this does not apply if the rights are inherently personal or if the contract includes an assignment clause that restricts or modifies this general right. Many contracts contain a provision requiring the consent of the other party for an assignment to occur, ensuring that rights are not transferred without the other party’s knowledge.

Once an assignment of rights is made, the assignee gains the right to benefit from the contract and can initiate legal proceedings to enforce these rights. This enforcement can be done either independently or alongside the assignor, depending on whether the assignment is legal or equitable. It’s important to note that while rights under the contract can be assigned, the contractual obligations or burdens cannot be transferred in this manner. Therefore, the assignor remains liable for any obligations under the contract that are not yet fulfilled at the time of the assignment.

Choosing Between Assignment and Novation in a Construction Contract

Choosing between a deed of novation and an assignment agreement depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the parties involved in a contract. Both options serve to transfer rights and obligations but in fundamentally different ways, each with its own legal implications, risks, and benefits. Understanding these differences and considering various factors can help in making an informed decision that aligns with your goals.

The choice between assignment and novation in a construction project scenario, where, for instance, an employer wishes to engage a subcontractor directly due to loss of confidence in the main contractor, hinges on several factors. These are:

• Nature of the Contract:  The type of contract you’re dealing with (e.g., service, sales) can influence which option is more suitable. For instance, novation might be preferred for service contracts where obligations are personal and specific to the original parties.
• Parties Involved: Consent is a key factor. Novation requires the agreement of all original and new parties, making it a viable option only when such consent is attainable. Assignment might be more feasible if obtaining consent from all parties poses a challenge.
• Complexity of the Transaction: For transactions involving multiple parties and obligations, novation could be more appropriate as it ensures a clean transfer of all rights and obligations. Assignment might leave the original party with ongoing responsibilities.
• Time and Cost: Consider the practical aspects, such as the time and financial cost associated with each option. Novation typically involves more complex legal processes and might be more time-consuming and costly than an assignment.

If the intention is merely to transfer the rights of the subcontractor’s work to the employer without altering the subcontractor’s obligations under a contract, an assignment might suffice. However, if the goal is to completely transfer the main contractor’s contractual role and obligations to the employer or another entity, novation would be necessary, ensuring that all parties consent to this new arrangement and the original contractor is released from their obligations.

The legal interpretations and court decisions highlight the importance of the document’s substance over its label. Even if a document is titled a “Deed of Assignment,” it could function as a novation if it transfers obligations and responsibilities and involves the consent of all parties. The key is to clearly understand and define the objective behind changing the contractual relationships and to use a deed — assignment or novation — that best achieves the desired legal and practical outcomes, ensuring the continuity and successful completion of the construction project.

Understanding the distinction between assignment deeds and novation deeds is crucial for anyone involved in contractual agreements. Novation offers a clean slate by transferring both rights and obligations to a new party, requiring the consent of all involved. Assignment, conversely, allows for the transfer of contractual benefits without altering the original contract’s obligations. Each method serves different strategic purposes, from simplifying transitions to preserving original contractual duties. The choice between novation and assignment hinges on specific legal, financial, and practical considerations unique to each situation. At PBL Law Group, we specialise in providing comprehensive legal advice and support in contract law. Our team is dedicated to helping clients understand their options and make informed decisions that align with their legal and business objectives. Let’s discuss!

Authored by

Director lawyer, talk to a lawyer today, speak to us now on, 02 9994 0345, or request a consultation., we respond within 24 hours., from our experience, expert insights that matter to you.

Family Limited Partnership (FLP) for International Estate Planning

Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs) offer a strategic approach for families looking to manage substantial assets, providing avenues for wealth preservation,

How to Use Life Insurance for International Estate Planning: A Comprehensive Guide

Life insurance stands as an important tool for estate planning, offering not only peace of mind but also a strategic

Choosing the Right Vehicle for International Estate Planning: A Guide to International Estate Planning Tools

When planning how to manage and pass on your estate, picking the right strategy is crucial. This choice involves looking

Get Help Today

Request a consultation.

Use the form to request a consultation with one of our expert lawyers.

We will contact you within 24 hours.

Or Speak to us now on

[email protected]

Sydney Office

Level 57 / 25, Martin Place, Sydney NSW 2000

Central Coast Office

Suite 119 / 159, Mann Street, Gosford NSW 2250

Coffs Harbour Office

Level 1 / 9 Park Ave, Coffs Harbour NSW 2450

• Copyright © 2024 PBL Law Group. All Rights Reserved

Website by Commersion Legal

Raea is Managing Director and Principal Lawyer for PBl Law Group. Raea assists clients with major projects, property developments, construction and strata law.

He has worked in Western Australia and Queensland assisting with expansion projects in the energy and resource sector and now predominately advises clients in Strata and Community Association matters.

He is a member of the Australian College of Strata Lawyers where majority of his work is advising developers and owners corporations with dispute related minor and major defects, strata governance and common property litigation. He is proficient at leading negotiations and meetings.

Raea has a particular interest in the commercial aspect of any dispute and always tries to weigh up the risk, reward and benefit of legal proceedings at each different stage.

Raea enjoys all forms of competitive sport, including Crossfit and actively participates in Triathlons, representing Australia as an age group athlete. He was a member of Red Head Surf Lifesaving club.

• Construction & Major Projects
• Planning & Environment Law
• +1-206-156 2849
• [email protected]

• Now Trending:
• UNDERSTANDING TENANCIES ...
• THE SENIOR PARTNER OF PR...
• Dr. Prince O. Williams-J...
• How To Pick The Right Ho...

DEED OF ASSIGNMENT: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW.

A Deed of Assignment refers to a legal document in which an assignor states his willingness to assign the ownership of his property to the assignee. The Deed of Assignment is required to effect a transfer of property and to show the legal right to possess it. It is always a subject of debate whether Deed of Assignment is a contract; a Deed of Assignment is actually a contract where the owner (the “assignor”) transfers ownership over certain property to another person (the “assignee”) by way of assignment. As a result of the assignment, the assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and assumes all the rights and obligations pertaining to the property.

In Nigeria, a Deed of Assignment is one of the legal documents that transfer authentic legal ownership in a property. There are several other documents like a deed of gifts, Assent, etc. However, this article focuses on the deed of assignment.

It is the written proof of ownership that stipulates the kind of rights or interests being transferred to the buyer which is a legal interest.

Read Also: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRANSFER OF PROPERTY THROUGH WILLS AND DEED OF GIFT

CONTENTS OF A DEED OF ASSIGNMENT

Content of a Deed of Assignment matters a lot to the transaction and special skill is needed for a hitch-free transaction. The contents of a deed of assignment can be divided into 3 namely; the introductory part, the second (usually the operative part), and the concluding part.

• THE INTRODUCTORY PART: This part enumerates the preliminary matters such as the commencement date, parties in the transaction, and recitals. The parties mentioned in the deed must be legal persons which can consist of natural persons and entities with corporate personality, the name, address, and status of the parties must be included. The proper descriptions of the parties are the assignor (seller) and assignee (buyer). The Recitals give the material facts constituting the background to the current transaction in chronological order.
• THE SECOND PART (USUALLY THE OPERATIVE PART): This is the part where the interest or title in the property is actually transferred from the assignor to the assignee. It is more like the engine room of the deed of assignment. The operative part usually starts with testatum and it provides for other important clauses such as the consideration (price) of the property, the accepted receipt by the assignor, the description of the property, and the terms and conditions of the transaction.
• The testimonium : this shows that all the parties are involved in the execution of the deed.
• Execution : this means signing. The capacity of the parties (either individual, corporate bodies, illiterates) is of great essence in the mode of execution.  It is important to note that the type of parties involved determines how they will sign. Example 2 directors or a director/secretary will sign if a company is involved. In the same way, if an association, couple, individual, illiterate, family land (omonile), firm, unregistered association, etc. is involved the format of signature would be different.
• Attestation : this refers to the witnessing of the execution of the deed by witnesses.

For a Deed of Assignment to be effective, it must include a column for the Governor of the state or a representative of the Government where the property is, to sign/consent to the transaction. By virtue of Sec. 22 of the Land Use Act, and Sec. 10 Land Instrument Registration Law, the Governor must consent to the transaction.

Do you have any further questions? feel free to call Ibejulekkilawyer on 08034869295 or send a mail to [email protected] and we shall respond accordingly.

Disclaimer: The above is for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Ibejulekkilawyer.com (blog) shall not be liable to any person(s) for any damage or liability arising whatsoever following the reliance of the information contained herein. Consult us or your legal practitioner for legal advice.

Only 22% of poorest Nigerian households have electricity access –World Bank

Related Posts

In the realm of intellectual property, a Deed of Assignment is a formal legal document used to transfer all rights, title, and interest in intellectual property from the assignor (original owner) to the assignee (new owner). This is crucial for the correct transfer of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and other IP rights. The deed typically requires specific legal formalities, sometimes notarization, to ensure it is legally enforceable.

To be legally effective a deed of assignment must contain:

• Title of the Document : It should clearly be labeled as a "Deed of Assignment" to identify the nature of the document.
• Date : The date on which the deed is executed should be clearly mentioned.
• Parties Involved : Full names and addresses of both the assignor (the party transferring the rights) and the assignee (the party receiving the rights). This identifies the parties to the agreement.
• Recitals : This section provides the background of the transaction. It typically includes details about the ownership of the assignor and the intention behind the assignment.
• Definition and Interpretation : Any terms used within the deed that have specific meanings should be clearly defined in this section.
• Description of the Property or Rights : A detailed description of the property or rights being assigned. For intellectual property, this would include details like patent numbers, trademark registrations , or descriptions of the copyrighted material.
• Terms of Assignment : This should include the extent of the rights being transferred, any conditions or limitations on the assignment, and any obligations the assignor or assignee must fulfill as part of the agreement.
• Warranties and Representations : The assignor typically makes certain warranties regarding their ownership of the property and the absence of encumbrances or third-party claims against it.
• Governing Law : The deed should specify which jurisdiction's laws govern the interpretation and enforcement of the agreement.
• Execution and Witnesses : The deed must be signed by both parties, and depending on jurisdictional requirements, it may also need to be witnessed and possibly notarized.
• Schedules or Annexures : If there are detailed lists or descriptions (like a list of patent numbers or property descriptions), these are often attached as schedules to the main body of the deed.

Letter of Assignment (for Trademarks and Patents)

This is a less formal document compared to the Deed of Assignment and is often used to record the assignment of rights or licensing of intellectual property on a temporary or limited basis. While it can outline the terms of the assignment, it may not be sufficient for the full transfer of legal title of IP rights. It's more commonly used in situations like assigning the rights to use a copyrighted work or a trademark license.

For example, company X allows company Y to use their trademark for specific products in a specific country for a specific period.  

At the same time, company X can use a Letter of Assignment to transfer a trademark to someone. In this case, it will be similar to the Deed of Assignment. 

Intellectual Property Sales Agreement

An IP Sales Agreement is a detailed contract that stipulates the terms and conditions of the sale of intellectual property. It covers aspects such as the specific rights being sold, payment terms, warranties regarding the ownership and validity of the IP, and any limitations or conditions on the use of the IP. This document is essential in transactions involving the sale of IP assets.

However, clients usually prefer to keep this document confidential and prepare special deeds of assignment or letter of assignment for different countries.

IP Transfer Declaration

In the context of intellectual property, a Declaration is often used to assert ownership or the originality of an IP asset. For example, inventors may use declarations in patent applications to declare their invention is original, or authors may use it to assert copyright ownership. It's a formal statement, sometimes required by IP offices or courts.

When assigning a trademark, the Declaration can be a valid document to function as a proof of the transfer. For example, a director of company X declares that the company had sold its Intellectual Property to company Y. 

Merger Document

When companies or entities with significant IP assets merge, an IP Merger Document is used. This document outlines how the intellectual property owned by the merging entities will be combined or managed. It includes details about the transfer, integration, or handling of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and any other intellectual property affected by the merger.

In all these cases, the precise drafting of documents is critical to ensure that IP rights are adequately protected and transferred. Legal advice is often necessary to navigate the complexities of intellectual property laws.

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy .

• assignments basic law

Assignments: The Basic Law

The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.

As with many terms commonly used, people are familiar with the term but often are not aware or fully aware of what the terms entail. The concept of assignment of rights and obligations is one of those simple concepts with wide ranging ramifications in the contractual and business context and the law imposes severe restrictions on the validity and effect of assignment in many instances. Clear contractual provisions concerning assignments and rights should be in every document and structure created and this article will outline why such drafting is essential for the creation of appropriate and effective contracts and structures.

The reader should first read the article on Limited Liability Entities in the United States and Contracts since the information in those articles will be assumed in this article.

Basic Definitions and Concepts:

An assignment is the transfer of rights held by one party called the “assignor” to another party called the “assignee.” The legal nature of the assignment and the contractual terms of the agreement between the parties determines some additional rights and liabilities that accompany the assignment. The assignment of rights under a contract usually completely transfers the rights to the assignee to receive the benefits accruing under the contract. Ordinarily, the term assignment is limited to the transfer of rights that are intangible, like contractual rights and rights connected with property. Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court , 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).

An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the underlying contract or lease. Where assignments are permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract but may merely assign the rights at that time. However, an assignment cannot have any adverse effect on the duties of the other party to the contract, nor can it diminish the chance of the other party receiving complete performance. The assignor normally remains liable unless there is an agreement to the contrary by the other party to the contract.

The effect of a valid assignment is to remove privity between the assignor and the obligor and create privity between the obligor and the assignee. Privity is usually defined as a direct and immediate contractual relationship. See Merchants case above.

Further, for the assignment to be effective in most jurisdictions, it must occur in the present. One does not normally assign a future right; the assignment vests immediate rights and obligations.

No specific language is required to create an assignment so long as the assignor makes clear his/her intent to assign identified contractual rights to the assignee. Since expensive litigation can erupt from ambiguous or vague language, obtaining the correct verbiage is vital. An agreement must manifest the intent to transfer rights and can either be oral or in writing and the rights assigned must be certain.

Note that an assignment of an interest is the transfer of some identifiable property, claim, or right from the assignor to the assignee. The assignment operates to transfer to the assignee all of the rights, title, or interest of the assignor in the thing assigned. A transfer of all rights, title, and interests conveys everything that the assignor owned in the thing assigned and the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor. Knott v. McDonald’s Corp ., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997)

The parties must intend to effectuate an assignment at the time of the transfer, although no particular language or procedure is necessary. As long ago as the case of National Reserve Co. v. Metropolitan Trust Co ., 17 Cal. 2d 827 (Cal. 1941), the court held that in determining what rights or interests pass under an assignment, the intention of the parties as manifested in the instrument is controlling.

The intent of the parties to an assignment is a question of fact to be derived not only from the instrument executed by the parties but also from the surrounding circumstances. When there is no writing to evidence the intention to transfer some identifiable property, claim, or right, it is necessary to scrutinize the surrounding circumstances and parties’ acts to ascertain their intentions. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998)

The general rule applicable to assignments of choses in action is that an assignment, unless there is a contract to the contrary, carries with it all securities held by the assignor as collateral to the claim and all rights incidental thereto and vests in the assignee the equitable title to such collateral securities and incidental rights. An unqualified assignment of a contract or chose in action, however, with no indication of the intent of the parties, vests in the assignee the assigned contract or chose and all rights and remedies incidental thereto.

More examples: In Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs ., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998), the court held that the assignee of a party to a subordination agreement is entitled to the benefits and is subject to the burdens of the agreement. In Florida E. C. R. Co. v. Eno , 99 Fla. 887 (Fla. 1930), the court held that the mere assignment of all sums due in and of itself creates no different or other liability of the owner to the assignee than that which existed from the owner to the assignor.

And note that even though an assignment vests in the assignee all rights, remedies, and contingent benefits which are incidental to the thing assigned, those which are personal to the assignor and for his sole benefit are not assigned. Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc ., 519 N.E.2d 153, 158 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988). Thus, if the underlying agreement provides that a service can only be provided to X, X cannot assign that right to Y.

Novation Compared to Assignment:

Although the difference between a novation and an assignment may appear narrow, it is an essential one. “Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party.” In a novation, a third party successfully substitutes the original party as a party to the contract. “When a contract is novated, the other contracting party must be left in the same position he was in prior to the novation being made.”

A sublease is the transfer when a tenant retains some right of reentry onto the leased premises. However, if the tenant transfers the entire leasehold estate, retaining no right of reentry or other reversionary interest, then the transfer is an assignment. The assignor is normally also removed from liability to the landlord only if the landlord consents or allowed that right in the lease. In a sublease, the original tenant is not released from the obligations of the original lease.

Equitable Assignments:

An equitable assignment is one in which one has a future interest and is not valid at law but valid in a court of equity. In National Bank of Republic v. United Sec. Life Ins. & Trust Co. , 17 App. D.C. 112 (D.C. Cir. 1900), the court held that to constitute an equitable assignment of a chose in action, the following has to occur generally: anything said written or done, in pursuance of an agreement and for valuable consideration, or in consideration of an antecedent debt, to place a chose in action or fund out of the control of the owner, and appropriate it to or in favor of another person, amounts to an equitable assignment. Thus, an agreement, between a debtor and a creditor, that the debt shall be paid out of a specific fund going to the debtor may operate as an equitable assignment.

In Egyptian Navigation Co. v. Baker Invs. Corp. , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30804 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2008), the court stated that an equitable assignment occurs under English law when an assignor, with an intent to transfer his/her right to a chose in action, informs the assignee about the right so transferred.

An executory agreement or a declaration of trust are also equitable assignments if unenforceable as assignments by a court of law but enforceable by a court of equity exercising sound discretion according to the circumstances of the case. Since California combines courts of equity and courts of law, the same court would hear arguments as to whether an equitable assignment had occurred. Quite often, such relief is granted to avoid fraud or unjust enrichment.

Note that obtaining an assignment through fraudulent means invalidates the assignment. Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. It vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments. Walker v. Rich , 79 Cal. App. 139 (Cal. App. 1926). If an assignment is made with the fraudulent intent to delay, hinder, and defraud creditors, then it is void as fraudulent in fact. See our article on Transfers to Defraud Creditors .

But note that the motives that prompted an assignor to make the transfer will be considered as immaterial and will constitute no defense to an action by the assignee, if an assignment is considered as valid in all other respects.

Enforceability of Assignments:

Whether a right under a contract is capable of being transferred is determined by the law of the place where the contract was entered into. The validity and effect of an assignment is determined by the law of the place of assignment. The validity of an assignment of a contractual right is governed by the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the assignment and the parties.

In some jurisdictions, the traditional conflict of laws rules governing assignments has been rejected and the law of the place having the most significant contacts with the assignment applies. In Downs v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co ., 14 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1964), a wife and her husband separated and the wife obtained a judgment of separation from the husband in New York. The judgment required the husband to pay a certain yearly sum to the wife. The husband assigned 50 percent of his future salary, wages, and earnings to the wife. The agreement authorized the employer to make such payments to the wife.

After the husband moved from New York, the wife learned that he was employed by an employer in Massachusetts. She sent the proper notice and demanded payment under the agreement. The employer refused and the wife brought an action for enforcement. The court observed that Massachusetts did not prohibit assignment of the husband’s wages. Moreover, Massachusetts law was not controlling because New York had the most significant relationship with the assignment. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the wife.

Therefore, the validity of an assignment is determined by looking to the law of the forum with the most significant relationship to the assignment itself. To determine the applicable law of assignments, the court must look to the law of the state which is most significantly related to the principal issue before it.

Assignment of Contractual Rights:

Generally, the law allows the assignment of a contractual right unless the substitution of rights would materially change the duty of the obligor, materially increase the burden or risk imposed on the obligor by the contract, materially impair the chance of obtaining return performance, or materially reduce the value of the performance to the obligor. Restat 2d of Contracts, § 317(2)(a). This presumes that the underlying agreement is silent on the right to assign.

If the contract specifically precludes assignment, the contractual right is not assignable. Whether a contract is assignable is a matter of contractual intent and one must look to the language used by the parties to discern that intent.

In the absence of an express provision to the contrary, the rights and duties under a bilateral executory contract that does not involve personal skill, trust, or confidence may be assigned without the consent of the other party. But note that an assignment is invalid if it would materially alter the other party’s duties and responsibilities. Once an assignment is effective, the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor and assumes all of assignor’s rights. Hence, after a valid assignment, the assignor’s right to performance is extinguished, transferred to assignee, and the assignee possesses the same rights, benefits, and remedies assignor once possessed. Robert Lamb Hart Planners & Architects v. Evergreen, Ltd. , 787 F. Supp. 753 (S.D. Ohio 1992).

On the other hand, an assignee’s right against the obligor is subject to “all of the limitations of the assignor’s right, all defenses thereto, and all set-offs and counterclaims which would have been available against the assignor had there been no assignment, provided that these defenses and set-offs are based on facts existing at the time of the assignment.” See Robert Lamb , case, above.

The power of the contract to restrict assignment is broad. Usually, contractual provisions that restrict assignment of the contract without the consent of the obligor are valid and enforceable, even when there is statutory authorization for the assignment. The restriction of the power to assign is often ineffective unless the restriction is expressly and precisely stated. Anti-assignment clauses are effective only if they contain clear, unambiguous language of prohibition. Anti-assignment clauses protect only the obligor and do not affect the transaction between the assignee and assignor.

Usually, a prohibition against the assignment of a contract does not prevent an assignment of the right to receive payments due, unless circumstances indicate the contrary. Moreover, the contracting parties cannot, by a mere non-assignment provision, prevent the effectual alienation of the right to money which becomes due under the contract.

A contract provision prohibiting or restricting an assignment may be waived, or a party may so act as to be estopped from objecting to the assignment, such as by effectively ratifying the assignment. The power to void an assignment made in violation of an anti-assignment clause may be waived either before or after the assignment. See our article on Contracts.

Noncompete Clauses and Assignments:

Of critical import to most buyers of businesses is the ability to ensure that key employees of the business being purchased cannot start a competing company. Some states strictly limit such clauses, some do allow them. California does restrict noncompete clauses, only allowing them under certain circumstances. A common question in those states that do allow them is whether such rights can be assigned to a new party, such as the buyer of the buyer.

A covenant not to compete, also called a non-competitive clause, is a formal agreement prohibiting one party from performing similar work or business within a designated area for a specified amount of time. This type of clause is generally included in contracts between employer and employee and contracts between buyer and seller of a business.

Many workers sign a covenant not to compete as part of the paperwork required for employment. It may be a separate document similar to a non-disclosure agreement, or buried within a number of other clauses in a contract. A covenant not to compete is generally legal and enforceable, although there are some exceptions and restrictions.

Whenever a company recruits skilled employees, it invests a significant amount of time and training. For example, it often takes years before a research chemist or a design engineer develops a workable knowledge of a company’s product line, including trade secrets and highly sensitive information. Once an employee gains this knowledge and experience, however, all sorts of things can happen. The employee could work for the company until retirement, accept a better offer from a competing company or start up his or her own business.

A covenant not to compete may cover a number of potential issues between employers and former employees. Many companies spend years developing a local base of customers or clients. It is important that this customer base not fall into the hands of local competitors. When an employee signs a covenant not to compete, he or she usually agrees not to use insider knowledge of the company’s customer base to disadvantage the company. The covenant not to compete often defines a broad geographical area considered off-limits to former employees, possibly tens or hundreds of miles.

Another area of concern covered by a covenant not to compete is a potential ‘brain drain’. Some high-level former employees may seek to recruit others from the same company to create new competition. Retention of employees, especially those with unique skills or proprietary knowledge, is vital for most companies, so a covenant not to compete may spell out definite restrictions on the hiring or recruiting of employees.

A covenant not to compete may also define a specific amount of time before a former employee can seek employment in a similar field. Many companies offer a substantial severance package to make sure former employees are financially solvent until the terms of the covenant not to compete have been met.

Because the use of a covenant not to compete can be controversial, a handful of states, including California, have largely banned this type of contractual language. The legal enforcement of these agreements falls on individual states, and many have sided with the employee during arbitration or litigation. A covenant not to compete must be reasonable and specific, with defined time periods and coverage areas. If the agreement gives the company too much power over former employees or is ambiguous, state courts may declare it to be overbroad and therefore unenforceable. In such case, the employee would be free to pursue any employment opportunity, including working for a direct competitor or starting up a new company of his or her own.

It has been held that an employee’s covenant not to compete is assignable where one business is transferred to another, that a merger does not constitute an assignment of a covenant not to compete, and that a covenant not to compete is enforceable by a successor to the employer where the assignment does not create an added burden of employment or other disadvantage to the employee. However, in some states such as Hawaii, it has also been held that a covenant not to compete is not assignable and under various statutes for various reasons that such covenants are not enforceable against an employee by a successor to the employer. Hawaii v. Gannett Pac. Corp. , 99 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Haw. 1999)

It is vital to obtain the relevant law of the applicable state before drafting or attempting to enforce assignment rights in this particular area.

Conclusion:

In the current business world of fast changing structures, agreements, employees and projects, the ability to assign rights and obligations is essential to allow flexibility and adjustment to new situations. Conversely, the ability to hold a contracting party into the deal may be essential for the future of a party. Thus, the law of assignments and the restriction on same is a critical aspect of every agreement and every structure. This basic provision is often glanced at by the contracting parties, or scribbled into the deal at the last minute but can easily become the most vital part of the transaction.

As an example, one client of ours came into the office outraged that his co venturer on a sizable exporting agreement, who had excellent connections in Brazil, had elected to pursue another venture instead and assigned the agreement to a party unknown to our client and without the business contacts our client considered vital. When we examined the handwritten agreement our client had drafted in a restaurant in Sao Paolo, we discovered there was no restriction on assignment whatsoever…our client had not even considered that right when drafting the agreement after a full day of work.

One choses who one does business with carefully…to ensure that one’s choice remains the party on the other side of the contract, one must master the ability to negotiate proper assignment provisions.

Founded in 1939, our law firm combines the ability to represent clients in domestic or international matters with the personal interaction with clients that is traditional to a long established law firm.

Read more about our firm

© 2024, Stimmel, Stimmel & Roeser, All rights reserved  | Terms of Use | Site by Bay Design

100 Harris St, Pyrmont

24/7 Customer Support

You can call us 24/7 for urgent matters

Deed of Assignment vs Novation: A Comprehensive Guide

Home > Uncategorized > Deed of Assignment vs Novation: A Comprehensive Guide

• April 17, 2023

Deed of assignment and novation are two legal tools used to transfer contractual rights and obligations from one party to another. While both serve similar purposes, they differ in their implications and the extent of the transfer of rights and obligations. In this comprehensive guide, we will explore the key differences between the deeds of assignment and novation and provide insights into their respective uses.

Table of Contents

Deed of assignment and novation.

In the world of legal contracts, there are various tools available to transfer rights and obligations from one party to another. Two commonly used tools are deeds of assignment and novation. Both legal tools allow parties to transfer rights and obligations under a contract, but there are some differences between them.

A deed of assignment is a legal document that transfers the rights and obligations of one party to another party. It is often used in situations where one party wants to transfer its rights or obligations under a contract to another party without changing any other terms of the original contract. For example, if a homeowner wants to transfer their rights and obligations under a construction contract to a new contractor, they can use a deed of assignment to do so.

On the other hand, novation is a legal mechanism that allows parties to transfer both the rights and obligations of one party to another, and simultaneously replace one party in the original contract with a new party. In other words, novation replaces one party to the contract with another party, whereas a deed of assignment does not replace any party to the contract.

Novation is commonly used in situations where there is a change in ownership of a business or where a contractor wants to transfer its contractual obligations to a subcontractor. The novation process involves three parties: the original parties to the contract, the incoming party who will take over the obligations, and the outgoing party who will be released from their obligations.

In the following sections, we will delve deeper into the differences between the deeds of assignment and novation and explain how each legal tool works in practice.

Differences Between Deed of Assignment and Novation

When it comes to transferring rights and obligations under a contract, two legal tools commonly used are deeds of assignment and novation. Although both mechanisms involve the transfer of rights and obligations, they differ in various aspects, including the impact on the original contract and the consent required from the involved parties.

Rights and Obligations

Under a deed of assignment, the assignor transfers their rights and obligations to the assignee, but the original contract remains in force. In contrast, novation involves the creation of a new contract in which the original contract is extinguished, and a new contract is formed between the transferor, the transferee, and the obligor.

Original Contract

A deed of assignment does not affect the original contract between the assignor and the obligor, and the obligor must still perform their obligations to the assignee. In contrast, novation extinguishes the original contract, and the obligor’s obligations are owed to the transferee under the new contract.

New Contract or Deed

A deed of assignment does not require the creation of a new contract or deed, as the original contract remains in force. However, novation requires the creation of a new contract or deed, as the original contract is extinguished.

Consent Requirements

For a deed of assignment to be effective, the assignor must provide notice of the assignment to the obligor, but the obligor’s consent is not required. In contrast, novation requires the consent of all parties involved, including the transferor, the transferee, and the obligor.

It is crucial to understand the differences between a deed of assignment and a novation to choose the appropriate legal tool for transferring rights and obligations. Consider seeking legal advice before deciding which mechanism to use.

Novation in Detail

Novation is a legal process that transfers rights and obligations from one party to another. It differs from a deed of assignment in that it involves the substitution of a new party for an original party, rather than just the transfer of rights.

How a Novation Works

Novation requires the consent of all parties involved, including the new party that is taking on the rights and obligations. The process involves the following steps:

• Agreement: The parties involved must agree to the novation and the terms of the new arrangement.
• Documentation: A novation agreement must be drafted and signed by all parties involved.
• Communication: All relevant parties, such as banks or insurers, must be informed of the novation and give their consent.
• Implementation: The novation takes effect once all parties have signed the agreement and the necessary documentation has been completed.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Novation

There are several advantages to using novation in various situations, such as:

• It allows for the substitution of parties without the need for a new contract.
• It can simplify complex contractual arrangements.
• It can allow for a transfer of obligations to a party better equipped to fulfil them.

However, novation also has some potential drawbacks, such as:

• It requires the consent of all parties involved, which can be difficult to obtain.
• It can result in the loss of important rights or benefits for the original party.
• It can be more expensive and time-consuming than other legal tools.

Examples of Novation

Examples of novation include:

• When a new contractor takes over a construction project from the original contractor, assuming all the rights and obligations under the original contract.
• A subcontractor is working on a construction project for a main contractor. The subcontractor wants to assign the contract to another subcontractor due to financial difficulties. The main contractor agrees to novate the contract to the new subcontractor, who then takes over the subcontractor’s obligations and responsibilities.
• An engineering firm is contracted by a city to design and construct a new road. The engineering firm decides to sell the design and construction contract to another firm. The city agrees to novate the contract to the new firm so that the new firm can complete the project.
• A supplier has a contract with a contractor to supply building materials for a construction project. The supplier decides to sell the business to another company. The contractor agrees to novate the contract to the new company so that the new company can fulfil the supplier’s obligations under the contract.

Assignment in Detail

When a party to a contract transfers their rights and obligations to a third party, this is referred to as an assignment. The process of assignment is less complex than that of novation, as it does not require the formation of a new contract. Instead, a contract that already exists between two parties is simply transferred to a third party. Here are some details of the assignment:

How an Assignment Works

The process of assignment generally involves the following steps:

• The original parties to the contract must agree to the assignment.
• The assignor (the party transferring their rights and obligations) must provide written notice of the assignment to the other party.
• The assignee (the third party taking over the rights and obligations) must accept the assignment in writing.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Assignment

Like novation, assignment has its advantages and disadvantages. Some of the benefits of using assignment include:

• Flexibility: Assignment is a more flexible process than novation, as it doesn’t require the formation of a new contract.
• Simplicity: The process of assignment is less complex and less time-consuming than that of novation.

However, there are also some disadvantages to using assignment:

• No release from liability: Unlike novation, assignment does not release the assignor from their obligations under the original contract.
• Lack of control: The original party to the contract may be concerned about losing control over who they are dealing with if an assignment takes place.

Examples of Assignment

Here are some examples of assignments in the construction industry:

• A subcontractor assigns their right to receive payment for their work to a third party, such as a lender, to secure a loan.
• A contractor assigns their right to receive payment from the owner to a supplier or vendor to pay for materials or equipment used in the project.
• A developer assigns their right to receive payments from buyers of individual units in a development to a lender to secure financing for the project.
• A contractor assigns their right to receive payment from the owner to a joint venture partner to share the risk and reward of the project.
• An owner assigns their right to receive payments from a contractor to a surety to secure a performance bond for the project.

No Assignment Clauses in Construction Contracts

No assignment clauses are common in construction contracts and can have significant implications for both parties involved. These clauses prevent the transfer of rights or obligations to a third party without prior consent from the other party. In the context of construction contracts, the party with the most interest in such clauses is the Principal, who is usually the owner of the project.

Purpose of No Assignment Clauses

There are several reasons why Principals include no assignment clauses in construction contracts. These include:

• Maintaining control: By preventing the assignment of rights and obligations, the Principal maintains control over the project and ensures that all decisions and actions are made by the original contracting parties.
• Protecting interests: No assignment clauses can help protect the Principal’s interests by preventing the transfer of obligations to a third party who may not have the same level of expertise or resources as the original party.
• Avoiding conflicts: No assignment clauses can prevent conflicts that may arise from a change in the parties involved in the contract.

How to Negotiate a No Assignment Clause

If a Principal wishes to include a no assignment clause in a construction contract, they should be prepared to negotiate this with the other party. Here are some tips for negotiating a no assignment clause:

• Be clear about the reasons for the clause: The Principal should explain their reasons for including the no assignment clause and how it will benefit both parties.
• Consider exceptions: The Principal should consider including exceptions to the no assignment clause, such as allowing assignment with prior written consent or in the event of a sale of the business.
• Be reasonable: The Principal should ensure that the no assignment clause is reasonable and does not unfairly restrict the other party’s ability to conduct their business.
• Seek legal advice: Both parties should seek legal advice before finalising the contract to ensure that the no assignment clause is enforceable and does not contravene any laws or regulations.

No assignment clauses are an important consideration in construction contracts and should be negotiated carefully to protect the interests of all parties involved.

In conclusion, both deeds of assignment and novation are important legal tools that allow for the transfer of rights and obligations in a contract. However, they differ in terms of the impact on the original contract, the need for a new contract or deed, and the consent requirements of involved parties. It is important to carefully consider the specific circumstances and objectives of the parties involved before choosing the appropriate legal tool.

In the case of construction contracts, no assignment clauses play a crucial role in protecting the interests of Principals. They ensure that the Principal has control over who performs the works and avoids having to work with an unknown or untested contractor. Principals must understand the purpose of no assignment clauses and negotiate them carefully to ensure that their interests are protected.

Ultimately, seeking legal advice is recommended when deciding which legal tool to use or negotiating the terms of a contract. A lawyer can provide guidance on the best course of action and ensure that the parties involved are aware of their rights and obligations.

Related Articles

Diving into the world of construction as an owner-builder in NSW is akin to setting sail on an adventurous voyage. It’s a journey filled with the promise of personalising your dream home from the ground up. Yet, like any grand expedition, it comes with its fair share of challenges and risks. Foremost among these is navigating the often complex process of filing insurance claims. Whether you’re at the helm of your first build or you’re a seasoned constructor of bespoke homes, understanding the intricacies of insurance claims for owner builders is paramount. This guide aims to demystify the process, ensuring you’re well-equipped to safeguard your project against unforeseen events.

Embarking on a construction project as an owner-builder in New South Wales (NSW) is a thrilling journey that promises not only the joy of crafting your dream home but also introduces a complex maze of responsibilities and risks. At the heart of navigating this adventure safely is securing the right insurance. Understanding and choosing from the myriad of owner builder insurance options available can be daunting, yet it’s fundamental to protecting your project, your future home, and yourself. This article aims to demystify the insurance landscape, offering a comparative analysis of the various insurance options in NSW, ensuring you’re well-equipped to make informed decisions.

Embarking on a journey as an owner builder in NSW is both an exciting and daunting endeavour. It’s a path that offers the freedom to create and manage your own construction project, but it also comes with a significant financial commitment. Fortunately, the NSW Government provides a lifeline through various grants and subsidies, designed to lighten the financial load and support your building dreams. This guide delves into the financial assistance available for owner builders in NSW, ensuring your project not only starts on solid ground but also reaches completion with success.

Send us a message. We’d love to hear from you.​

If you’re a homeowner in New South Wales, it’s crucial to understand Construction Law to protect your investment. This ultimate guide to Construction Law is specifically designed to provide homeowners with essential insights into the legal landscape of home building in NSW.

Send us a message. We'd love to hear from you.​

You can be confident that you are getting the right legal advice., working hours.

   • 8am - 8pm Monday to Friday    • Phone until 18:00 hrs    • Friday - 8:00-18:00

Our Address Location

   • 100 Harris St, Pyrmont, NSW 2009, Australia    • You can contact us 24/7 for urgent matters    • Email: [email protected]

Construction Lawyers Sydney  |  Contract Lawyers Sydney

Thank you for downloading our Free Letter Template. We hope it helps you with your project!

ADVOCATES & SOLICITO RS  I COMPANY SECRETARY

+ 03 - 78779758

+6012-6582798

• Aug 21, 2023

Deed of Assignment v Deed of Novation - When and how to use them

Updated: Aug 26, 2023

Regarding the transfer of rights and obligations within a contract, two frequently employed legal methods are deeds of assignment novation. Even though both approaches encompass the transfer of rights and responsibilities, they contrast in several ways, such as their effects on the original contract and the requirement of the necessary consent by the parties involved.

Rights and Obligations

In the context of a deed of assignment, the assignor transfers its rights and responsibilities to the assignee, while the initial contract remains valid. Conversely, novation entails establishing a fresh agreement that replaces the original one, forming a new agreement involving the transferor, transferee, and obligor.

Requirement of Consent

To ensure the validity of an assignment deed, the assignor needs to notify the obligor about the assignment, although the obligor’s consent isn't necessary. Conversely, novation demands agreement from all parties—transferor, transferee, and obligor.

Novation in detail

How it works

Novation mandates the approval of every party engaged, including the fresh entrant adopting the responsibilities and rights. The procedure encompasses these stages:

Agreement: All involved parties need to reach a consensus on the novation's terms and the new setup.

Paperwork: A novation agreement needs preparation and endorsement from all parties concerned.

Notification/approvals: All pertinent entities, such as financial institutions or insurers, must be informed of the novation and provide their consent/approval.

Execution: The novation becomes operational once all parties have inked the agreement and the requisite paperwork is finalized.

Novation in action:

· When a fresh contractor assumes control of a construction venture from the original contractor, taking on all the rights and duties specified in the initial agreement.

· In the context of a construction project, if a subcontractor, grappling with financial issues, intends to transfer their responsibilities to another subcontractor, the primary contractor can agree to novate the contract. This process allows the new subcontractor to inherit the obligations and commitments of the original subcontractor.

· An engineering company, commissioned by a municipality to design and build a new road, decides to sell the design and construction contract to another firm. The municipality approves a novation, permitting the new firm to take over the contract and conclude the project

· If a supplier holding a contract with a contractor to deliver construction materials opts to sell their business to another entity, the contractor can consent to a novation. This facilitates the transition of the contract to the new company, ensuring the new entity fulfills the supplier's duties as stipulated in the contract.

Assignment in detail

How an assignment works

The typical procedure for assignment includes these stages:

The initial contracting parties need to reach a consensus on the assignment.

The assignor (the entity transferring rights and obligations) is required to formally inform the other party in writing about the assignment.(typically)

The assignee (the new party assuming rights and obligations) must acknowledge the assignment in written form. (again, typically)

Assignment in action

· A subcontractor transfers their entitlement to payment for their services to a third party, often a lender, as collateral for a loan.

· A contractor delegates their right to receive payment from the project owner to a supplier or vendor, aiming to settle expenses for materials or equipment utilized in the undertaking.

· A property developer relinquishes their right to collect payments from buyers of individual units within a development to a lender, thereby obtaining financing for the venture.

· A contractor relinquishes their right to receive payment from the owner and assigns it to a joint venture partner, distributing the risk and reward of the project.

Grasping the distinctions between assignment deeds and novation is vital for selecting the right method of transferring rights and responsibilities. Prior to making a decision, it's advisable to consult legal experts for guidance on which approach to adopt.

Let's Chat

If you need help in further understanding the distinction between assignment and novation, or require some assistance in transferring certain rights and obligations, feel free to contact us to schedule a complementary consultation.

• law, articles, contract
• legal, articles, business law, comp

Recent Posts

Understanding Legal Retainers in Malaysia: A Comprehensive Guide by Rajvin Gill & Co.

An Overview of Foreign Investment Laws and Policies in Malaysia

What we do: Commercial Law Advisory in Malaysia

Comentarios

UK: Contracts: The Critical Difference Between Assignment and Novation

Introduction.

An assignment of rights under a contract is normally restricted to the benefit of the contract. Where a party wishes to transfer both the benefit and burden of the contract this generally needs to be done by way of a novation. The distinction between assignment and novation was addressed recently in the case of Davies v Jones (2009), whereby the court considered whether a deed of assignment of the rights under a contract could also transfer a positive contractual obligation, which in this instance included the obligation to pay.

Mr Jones (the first defendant) contracted to sell Lidl (the second defendant) a freehold property (the "Lidl Contract"). At that time, the freehold was vested in the claimants as trustees of a retired benefit scheme. Mr Jones contracted to buy the land from the claimants (the " Trustee Contract") and assigned his right, title and interest to the Trustee Contract to Lidl by way of a deed of assignment.

Clause 18 of the Trustee Contract permitted Mr Jones, as purchaser, to retain £100,000 from the purchase monies payable to the claimants until the outstanding works (ground clearance and site preparation) had been completed. Following completion of the works Mr Jones was entitled to retain one half of the proper costs from the retention and release the balance to the claimants. There was a similar clause in the Lidl Contract, which allowed Lidl to retain the proper costs from the retention. Importantly, although similar, under the Lidl Contract Lidl was entitled to retain the whole cost of carrying out the works as against only half in the Trustee Contract.

Lidl retained the sum of £100,000 from the money due by Mr Jones to the claimants on completion of the contract. Once the works were completed Mr Jones failed to pay the claimant the retention monies claiming that the proper cost of the works was over £200,000.

The claimants argued that the benefits granted by way of the assignment were conditional on Lidl performing Mr Jones' obligations under the Trustee Contract. Therefore, the question considered by the court was whether Lidl was bound to observe the terms of the Trustee Contract and in particular clause 18, given that benefit of the contract had been assigned to them.

The court held that the benefit which passed to Lidl by way of the deed of assignment did not require Lidl to perform the obligations of Mr Jones under the Trustee Contract. The assignment did not impose any burden on Lidl. The only person who clause 18 of the Trustee Contract was binding on was Mr Jones. The transfer to Lidl could not impose on Lidl the obligation to perform Mr Jones' obligations and these therefore remained with Mr Jones. This reaffirms the principle that when you take an assignment of a contract, you don't take on the burden (except in limited circumstances where enjoyment of the benefit is conditional on complying with some formality). Therefore, if an owner assigns a building contract to a purchaser of land and the building is still under construction, the obligation to pay the contractor remains with the original owner and does not pass to the new owner.

Assignment and novation in the Construction Industry

Both assignment and novation are common within the construction industry and careful consideration is required as to which mechanism is suitable. Assignments are frequently used in relation to collateral warranties, whereby the benefit of a contract is transferred to a third party. Likewise, an assignment of rights to a third party with an interest in a project may be suitable when the Employer still needs to fulfil certain obligations under the contract, for example, where works are still in progress. A novation is appropriate where the original contracting party wants the obligations under the contract to rest with a third party. This is commonly seen in a design and build scenario whereby the Employer novates the consultants' contracts to the Contractor, so that the benefit and burden of the appointments are transferred, and the Employer benefits from a single point of responsibility in the form of the Contractor.

If the intention is that the assignee is to accept both the benefit and burden of a contract, it is not normally sufficient to rely on a deed of assignment, as the burden of the contract remains with the assignor. In these instances a novation would be a preferable method of transferring obligations, and this allows for both the benefit and burden to be transferred to the new party and leaves no residual liability with the transferor.

Reference: Davies v Jones [2009] EWCA Civ 1164 .

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 07/06/2010.

  © Mondaq® Ltd 1994 - 2024. All Rights Reserved .

Login to Mondaq.com

Password Passwords are Case Sensitive

Forgot your password?

Why Register with Mondaq

Free, unlimited access to more than half a million articles (one-article limit removed) from the diverse perspectives of 5,000 leading law, accountancy and advisory firms

Articles tailored to your interests and optional alerts about important changes

Receive priority invitations to relevant webinars and events

You’ll only need to do it once, and readership information is just for authors and is never sold to third parties.

Your Organisation

We need this to enable us to match you with other users from the same organisation. It is also part of the information that we share to our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

• Insights & events

Assigning debts and other contractual claims - not as easy as first thought

Harking back to law school, we had a thirst for new black letter law. Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925 kindly obliged. This lays down the conditions which need to be satisfied for an effective legal assignment of a chose in action (such as a debt). We won’t bore you with the detail, but suffice to say that what’s important is that a legal assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor, must be absolute (i.e. no conditions attached) and crucially that written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

When assigning debts, it’s worth remembering that you can’t legally assign part of a debt – any attempt to do so will take effect as an equitable assignment. The main practical difference between a legal and an equitable assignment is that the assignor will need to be joined in any legal proceedings in relation to the assigned debt (e.g. an attempt to recover that part of the debt).

Recent cases which tell another story

Why bother telling you the above?  Aside from our delight in remembering the joys of debating the merits of legal and equitable assignments (ehem), it’s worth revisiting our textbooks in the context of three recent cases. Although at first blush the statutory conditions for a legal assignment seem quite straightforward, attempts to assign contractual claims such as debts continue to throw up legal disputes:

• In  Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp Europe Ltd v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV) [2019] EWHC 2250 (Comm),  the High Court held that a performance bond issued under a construction contract was not effectively assigned despite the surety acknowledging a notice of assignment of the bond. Sadly, the notice of assignment failed to meet the requirements under the bond instrument that the assignee confirm its acceptance of a provision in the bond that required the employer to repay the surety in the event of an overpayment. This case highlights the importance of ensuring any purported assignment meets any conditions stipulated in the underlying documents.
• In  Promontoria (Henrico) Ltd v Melton [2019] EWHC 2243 (Ch) (26 June 2019) , the High Court held that an assignment of a facility agreement and legal charges was valid, even though the debt assigned had to be identified by considering external evidence. The deed of assignment in question listed the assets subject to assignment, but was illegible to the extent that the debtor’s name could not be deciphered. The court got comfortable that there had been an effective assignment, given the following factors: (i) the lender had notified the borrower of its intention to assign the loan to the assignee; (ii) following the assignment, the lender had made no demand for repayment; (iii) a manager of the assignee had given a statement that the loan had been assigned and the borrower had accepted in evidence that he was aware of the assignment. Fortunately for the assignee, a second notice of assignment - which was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment - did not invalidate the earlier assignment, which was found to be effective. The court took a practical and commercial view of the circumstances, although we recommend ensuring that your assignment documents clearly reflect what the parties intend!
• Finally, in Nicoll v Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch),  the High Court held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the effective date of assignment stated in the notice could not be verified by the debtor. The case concerned a debt assigned by the Co-op Bank to Promontoria and a joint notice given by assignor and assignee to the debtor that the debt had been assigned “on and with effect from 29 July 2016”. A subsequent statutory demand served by Promontoria on the debtor for the outstanding sums was disputed on the basis that the notice of assignment was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment. Whilst accepting that the documentation was incapable of verifying with certainty the date of assignment, the Court held that the joint notice clearly showed that both parties had agreed that an assignment had taken place and was valid. This decision suggests that mistakes as to the date of assignment in a notice of assignment may not necessarily be fatal, if it is otherwise clear that the debt has been assigned.

The conclusion from the above? Maybe it’s not quite as easy as first thought to get an assignment right. Make sure you follow all of the conditions for a legal assignment according to the underlying contract and ensure your assignment documentation is clear.

Contact our experts for further advice

Search our site

Understanding a deed of assignment for intellectual property

A deed of transfer is used to change the ownership of intellectual property, a common occurrence in business. Explore how and when to use one.

Find out more about intellectual property basics

by   Brette Sember, J.D.

Brette is a former attorney and has been a writer and editor for more than 25 years. She is the author of more than 4...

Read more...

Updated on: November 24, 2023 · 3min read

Understanding intellectual property in business

How to transfer intellectual property rights in business, what to include in a deed of assignment, registering new ownership, restrictions on intellectual property transfers.

Most companies have intellectual property as part of their assets, including software, product design, or copyright to white papers. Buying or selling such property is done using a document called a deed of assignment.

A large part of what a business consists of may be tied to intellectual property . It's easy to see physical property a company owns, such as a building, office furniture, or inventory, but intellectual property can be more challenging to identify.

Most businesses have intellectual property, or works created by human minds or, in some cases, by computers. Some examples of intellectual property include architectural drawings, ad campaigns, company or product names, inventions, and source code.

Examples of when transfers of intellectual property might happen include when a company is buying another company, when you are setting up an LLC and want to transfer your intellectual property into the company, or when a business buys product rights from another company or individual.

A deed of assignment can be done in one transaction, instead of one transaction for each item of intellectual property, by transferring all ownership rights of all intellectual property detailed in the deed. The document is signed by both the buyer and seller. No payment is required for it to be valid.

A deed of assignment must be in writing and should include:

• The names and addresses of the assignor and assignee
• A description of the program or product for which the rights are being transferred
• A statement that all intellectual property rights to the property are being transferred
• Signatures of the parties and the date of the agreement execution

The deed could also include the following sections, where applicable:

• Consideration, or payment, to be made to the original owner.
• Warranties, or promises that the intellectual property rights being assigned don't infringe on anyone else's intellectual property rights . For example, in a deed regarding the transfer of a copyright, this section could state that the copyrighted work is original and not owned by someone else.
• Indemnification, or promise by the seller to reimburse the assignee if there is some problem with title to the property.
• Future assignments. For example, the agreement could be ongoing, so that anything the assignor creates in the future for this product or program is also transferred to the buyer.

Although a deed of assignment transfers ownership in intellectual property , it does not change the registration of the ownership. The assignee is responsible for handling all registration requirements.

For example, if a patent is transferred via a deed of assignment, the new owner must record the change in ownership with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Similarly, the transfer of a copyright is recorded with the U.S. Copyright Office.

Transfers of intellectual property must comply with U.S. laws. One obvious caveat is that you can't transfer property you don't own. Transfers must also comply with antitrust laws, which are set up to prevent one company from completely dominating an industry.

If intellectual property rights are being transferred overseas, the transfer must comply with Export Administration Regulations and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations , which are designed to protect national security and trade.

The deed of assignment can be a crucial part of a business deal or transaction. You can create a deed of assignment yourself, or you can work with an attorney .

You may also like

How to write a will: A comprehensive guide to will writing

Writing a will is one of the most important things you can do for yourself and for your loved ones, and it can be done in just minutes. Are you ready to get started?

February 9, 2024 · 11min read

What is a power of attorney (POA)? A comprehensive guide

Setting up a power of attorney to make your decisions when you can't is a smart thing to do because you never know when you'll need help from someone you trust.

February 8, 2024 · 15min read

Assignment of Contract

Jump to section, what is an assignment of contract.

An assignment of contract is a legal term that describes the process that occurs when the original party (assignor) transfers their rights and obligations under their contract to a third party (assignee). When an assignment of contract happens, the original party is relieved of their contractual duties, and their role is replaced by the approved incoming party.

How Does Assignment of Contract Work?

An assignment of contract is simpler than you might think.

The process starts with an existing contract party who wishes to transfer their contractual obligations to a new party.

When this occurs, the existing contract party must first confirm that an assignment of contract is permissible under the legally binding agreement . Some contracts prohibit assignments of contract altogether, and some require the other parties of the agreement to agree to the transfer. However, the general rule is that contracts are freely assignable unless there is an explicit provision that says otherwise.

In other cases, some contracts allow an assignment of contract without any formal notification to other contract parties. If this is the case, once the existing contract party decides to reassign his duties, he must create a “Letter of Assignment ” to notify any other contract signers of the change.

The Letter of Assignment must include details about who is to take over the contractual obligations of the exiting party and when the transfer will take place. If the assignment is valid, the assignor is not required to obtain the consent or signature of the other parties to the original contract for the valid assignment to take place.

Check out this article to learn more about how assigning a contract works.

Contract Assignment Examples

Contract assignments are great tools for contract parties to use when they wish to transfer their commitments to a third party. Here are some examples of contract assignments to help you better understand them:

Anna signs a contract with a local trash company that entitles her to have her trash picked up twice a week. A year later, the trash company transferred her contract to a new trash service provider. This contract assignment effectively makes Anna’s contract now with the new service provider.

Hasina enters a contract with a national phone company for cell phone service. The company goes into bankruptcy and needs to close its doors but decides to transfer all current contracts to another provider who agrees to honor the same rates and level of service. The contract assignment is completed, and Hasina now has a contract with the new phone company as a result.

Here is an article where you can find out more about contract assignments.

Assignment of Contract in Real Estate

Assignment of contract is also used in real estate to make money without going the well-known routes of buying and flipping houses. When real estate LLC investors use an assignment of contract, they can make money off properties without ever actually buying them by instead opting to transfer real estate contracts .

This process is called real estate wholesaling.

Real Estate Wholesaling

Real estate wholesaling consists of locating deals on houses that you don’t plan to buy but instead plan to enter a contract to reassign the house to another buyer and pocket the profit.

The process is simple: real estate wholesalers negotiate purchase contracts with sellers. Then, they present these contracts to buyers who pay them an assignment fee for transferring the contract.

This process works because a real estate purchase agreement does not come with the obligation to buy a property. Instead, it sets forth certain purchasing parameters that must be fulfilled by the buyer of the property. In a nutshell, whoever signs the purchase contract has the right to buy the property, but those rights can usually be transferred by means of an assignment of contract.

This means that as long as the buyer who’s involved in the assignment of contract agrees with the purchasing terms, they can legally take over the contract.

But how do real estate wholesalers find these properties?

It is easier than you might think. Here are a few examples of ways that wholesalers find cheap houses to turn a profit on:

• Direct mailers
• Place newspaper ads
• Make posts in online forums
• Social media posts

The key to finding the perfect home for an assignment of contract is to locate sellers that are looking to get rid of their properties quickly. This might be a family who is looking to relocate for a job opportunity or someone who needs to make repairs on a home but can’t afford it. Either way, the quicker the wholesaler can close the deal, the better.

Once a property is located, wholesalers immediately go to work getting the details ironed out about how the sale will work. Transparency is key when it comes to wholesaling. This means that when a wholesaler intends to use an assignment of contract to transfer the rights to another person, they are always upfront about during the preliminary phases of the sale.

In addition to this practice just being good business, it makes sure the process goes as smoothly as possible later down the line. Wholesalers are clear in their intent and make sure buyers know that the contract could be transferred to another buyer before the closing date arrives.

After their offer is accepted and warranties are determined, wholesalers move to complete a title search . Title searches ensure that sellers have the right to enter into a purchase agreement on the property. They do this by searching for any outstanding tax payments, liens , or other roadblocks that could prevent the sale from going through.

Wholesalers also often work with experienced real estate lawyers who ensure that all of the legal paperwork is forthcoming and will stand up in court. Lawyers can also assist in the contract negotiation process if needed but often don’t come in until the final stages.

If the title search comes back clear and the real estate lawyer gives the green light, the wholesaler will immediately move to locate an entity to transfer the rights to buy.

One of the most attractive advantages of real estate wholesaling is that very little money is needed to get started. The process of finding a seller, negotiating a price, and performing a title search is an extremely cheap process that almost anyone can do.

On the other hand, it is not always a positive experience. It can be hard for wholesalers to find sellers who will agree to sell their homes for less than the market value. Even when they do, there is always a chance that the transferred buyer will back out of the sale, which leaves wholesalers obligated to either purchase the property themselves or scramble to find a new person to complete an assignment of contract with.

Learn more about assignment of contract in real estate by checking out this article .

Who Handles Assignment of Contract?

The best person to handle an assignment of contract is an attorney. Since these are detailed legal documents that deal with thousands of dollars, it is never a bad idea to have a professional on your side. If you need help with an assignment of contract or signing a business contract , post a project on ContractsCounsel. There, you can connect with attorneys who know everything there is to know about assignment of contract amendment and can walk you through the whole process.

Meet some of our Lawyers

NJ and NY corporate contract lawyer and founder of a firm specializing in helping entrepreneurs. With a background in law firms, technology, and world class corporate departments, I've handled contracts and negotiations for everything from commercial leases and one-off sales agreements, to multi-million dollar asset sales. I love taking a customer-focused and business-minded approach to helping my clients achieve their goals. Other information: learning to surf, lover of travel, and one-time marathoner (NYC 2018) yulawlegal.com

Angelica M.

Angelica McDonald, Esq. has singlehandedly established an in-demand law firm, won several accolades for her incredible work in her community and has her sights set on building a bi-coastal law practice that serves clients from her hometown to Hollywood. She is putting her city of Raeford, North Carolina on the map as the birthplace of the next legal superstar. And she is just at the onset of her career. An astute attorney, Angelica is sought after for her razor-sharp business acumen and her relentless litigation style. With a diverse background in entertainment, media and sports law, as well as business, she represents entrepreneurs and athletes on everything from complex contract negotiation to intellectual property matters, ensuring anything they’ve built is protected.

I have been in practice since 1990 and practice in D.C., Maryland, and Virginia. I am an experienced litigator and look forward to resolving your legal questions as efficiently as possible.

Hello! I am an Iowa native trying to bring some Midwest problem-solving to southern civil law. I thoroughly enjoy getting to know the individuals and businesses I assist. I practice estate planning and business formation and, with my litigation experience in mind, I help clients plan to ensure they and their interests are protected in the future.

Danielle G.

Danielle Giovannone is the principal of Danielle D. Giovannone Law Office. In her experience, Danielle has found that many business do not require in-house legal counsel, but still need outside counsel that knows their business just as well as in-house counsel. This need inspired Danielle to start her firm. Before starting her firm, Danielle served as Contracts Counsel at Siena College and as an attorney at the New York City Department of Education, Office of the General Counsel. At the NYCDOE, she served as lead counsel negotiating and drafting large-scale commercial agreements, including contracts with major technology firms on behalf of the school district. Prior to the NYCDOE, Danielle worked as an associate at a small corporate and securities law firm, where she gained hands-on experience right out of law school. Danielle has provided legal and policy advice on intellectual property and data privacy matters, as well as corporate law, formation and compliance, employer liability, insurance, regulatory matters, general municipal matters and non-profit issues. Danielle holds a J.D. from Fordham University School of Law and a B.S. from Cornell University. She is active in her Capital District community providing pro bono services to the Legal Project, and has served as Co-Chair to the Niskayuna Co-op Nursery School and Vice President of Services to the Craig Elementary School Parent Teacher Organization. Danielle is a member of the New York State Bar Association.

I am a Florida estate planning and probate attorney helping clients achieve their goals through personalized legal strategies. Excellent communication, thorough preparation, and accurate execution are the keys to success.

Ahaji Amos, PLLC is a Houston-based intellectual property and civil litigation firm servicing clients throughout the U.S.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Need help with a contract agreement.

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

CONTRACT LAWYERS BY TOP CITIES

• Austin Contracts Lawyers
• Boston Contracts Lawyers
• Chicago Contracts Lawyers
• Dallas Contracts Lawyers
• Denver Contracts Lawyers
• Houston Contracts Lawyers
• Los Angeles Contracts Lawyers
• New York Contracts Lawyers
• Phoenix Contracts Lawyers
• San Diego Contracts Lawyers
• Tampa Contracts Lawyers

ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT LAWYERS BY CITY

• Austin Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Boston Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Chicago Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Dallas Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Denver Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Houston Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Los Angeles Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• New York Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Phoenix Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• San Diego Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Tampa Assignment Of Contract Lawyers

Learn About Contracts

• Novation Contract

other helpful articles

• How much does it cost to draft a contract?
• Do Contract Lawyers Use Templates?
• How do Contract Lawyers charge?
• Business Contract Lawyers: How Can They Help?
• What to look for when hiring a lawyer

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

How It Works

Want to speak to someone.

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

You are here:

Litigation 101: The differences between deeds and agreements

There are legal and practical differences between deeds and agreements, and your choice of which to use will depend on the parties and the specific circumstances.

Deeds and agreements are both ways in which a deal between parties can be recorded so that it is legally binding. At first glance, deeds and agreements appear similar and the only difference between them appears to be the name of the documents themselves. However, there are key differences between them and how they are executed, and it is important for businesses to understand the distinction when structuring transactions to manage litigation risk and to resolve disputes.

What is an agreement?

An agreement is an understanding or arrangement between two or more parties. For an agreement to be legally binding, there must be:

• offer and acceptance;
• an intention to be legally bound; and
• consideration – that is, the promise or obligation must be part of a bargain between the parties, and something of value is given in return for the promise, often in the form of a counter-promise.

What is a deed?

A deed is a special type of promise or commitment that indicates the most serious and or solemn indication that the executing party intends to do what they have promised. A deed can:

• pass or confer legal or equitable interests in property or some other right;
• create an obligation binding on some person; or
• affirm an agreement that passes a legal or equitable interest in property or some other right.

Certain types of documents are commonly executed in the form of a deed, including:

• Deed Polls;
• Escrow Deeds;
• Confidentiality Deeds;
• Deeds of Termination;
• Settlement Deeds;
• Deeds of Company Arrangement;
• Forbearance Deeds;
• Guarantee Deeds;
• Novation Deeds; and
• Indemnity Deeds.

When resolving disputes, particularly litigation, it is common for parties to enter into a deed of settlement and release.

Legislation also requires that specific documents be executed in the form of a deed. For example, in all states and territories except the Australian Capital Territory, certain assurances of land, including conveyances and dispositions, must be made by deed.

What are the elements for a valid deed?

At common law, a deed must:

• be written on parchment, vellum or paper;
• have a personal seal placed on it; and
• be delivered to the other party.

These common law requirements have since been modified by legislation across all Australian jurisdictions. For example, Australian companies may execute a document as a deed if the document is expressed to be “executed as a deed” and otherwise signed in accordance with the provisions for the execution of documents under the Corporations Act< 2001 (Cth).

In New South Wales, a deed signed by an individual:

• must be signed and witnessed (by a person who is not a party to the deed); and
• is deemed to be “sealed” if it is expressed to be a deed. That is, the document expressly states that it is executed as a deed.

In New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland, a deed can also be created in electronic form, as well as signed and witnessed electronically. However, in South Australia, Western Australia, Northern Territory, Tasmania and the ACT, electronic execution of deeds is not permitted. The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) was also recently amended to allow electronic execution of deeds, provided certain conditions are met.

Where a deed is executed by a mix of companies and individuals, it is important to carefully consider the relevant provisions as the law governing the execution of deeds is not uniform.

How does a deed differ from an agreement?

In deciding whether to use an agreement or a deed to formalise legal obligations, you should consider the key differences between a deed and an agreement, which include:

• A deed does not require consideration . Given that consideration is a basic requirement of a valid agreement, a deed allows the parties to overcome any difficulties that may arise in enforcing a promise where no actual consideration is provided.
• A deed must be executed in writing . In contrast, agreements can be oral or in writing, unless specified by statute.
• A deed provides a longer limitation period . The limitation period for bringing an action under a deed is much longer than the limitation period for agreements and varies for each Australian jurisdiction.

The limitation period for breach of contract is 6 years in all States and Territories, except the Northern Territory, where it is 3 years. In contrast, the limitation period for an action founded upon a deed can be brought within the following limitation periods, from the date on which the cause of action arose:

• 15 years in Victoria and South Australia; and
• 12 years in New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory, Queensland, Tasmania, Western Australia and the Northern Territory.
• Equitable remedies will not be available for actions founded upon deeds which do not contain consideration. Deeds are generally not enforceable in equity if there is no consideration, because of the maxim that “equity will not support a volunteer”.

Practical tips when considering whether to use a deed or agreement

• Whether a deed is required by law
• Whether there are any specific corporate restrictions on the execution of deeds . For example, some authorities do not allow company representatives to sign deeds of behalf on the company.
• Whether a deed is desirable. For example, if there are any difficulties in proving consideration or a longer period to commence an action after breach is desired.
• Consider the availability of particular remedies for the breach of a deed
• Consider tax implications. For example, stamp duty may be payable on the execution of a deed.

Ultimately, this question will depend on the parties and the specific circumstances, and it is important that you seek specific legal advice if you are unclear.

Get in touch

+2348099223322

[email protected]

SUMMARY OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONTRACT OF SALE AND DEED OF ASSIGNMENT

Contract of sale and deed of assignment are both documents used in real estate-related transactions in Nigeria. Although they are both used in property transactions the difference between both documents can be derived from their distinctive features and the role they each individually play in the acquisition of title to landed properties in Nigeria.

Generally, there are five stages involved in the process of acquisition of land in Nigeria, which range from the pre-contract stage to the post-completion stage. The contract of sale is executed at the second stage of a land transaction; it is evidenced in writing and is not mandated to be under seal. It is a preliminary land document executed in the transfer of ownership in the land to another from the seller to the buyer. A contract of sale takes effect after it has been exchanged between parties and it contains not only the basic requirements but goes further to include detailed terms, consideration, and future obligations of what the parties have agreed in respect of the land transaction. Some of the provisions of a contract of sale are:

• Full details of the parties – (name and address).
• Particulars of the property to be transacted (location, survey plan, etc).
• Particulars of witnesses.
• Purchase price of the property.
• Payment of deposit, to whom it is to be paid, and in what capacity.
• Balance and interest on unpaid purchase sum where the payment is to be paid in installments.
• The capacity of the vendor.
• Risk and insurance.
• Possession before completion
• Completion date of the transaction.
• Provision for fixtures and fittings.
• Specific terms, risks, etc.

Where a contract of sale has been executed between parties, an equitable right of the title is passed to the buyer as the vendor still retains legal title to the land and holds the same in trust for the buyer. A vendor cannot transact with the land contrary to the agreement in the contract and no party can rescind the contract without being held liable for a breach of contract.

Features of a Contract of Sale

• In a contract of sale, the vendor is committed to the transaction and the purchaser has sufficient time to investigate the title before the final completion of the transaction.
• The death of either party to the transaction does not terminate the contract as personal representatives can proceed with the contract of sale.
• A contract of sale prevents last-minute withdrawal as withdrawal would amount to a breach of the contract.
• A contract of sale protects the equitable interest of the purchaser
• It crystallizes the position of the parties as terms have been expressly agreed upon.
• The vendor cannot unilaterally and subsequently increase the purchase price as the price has already been fixed in the contract.
• Payment of lesser stamp duties.

Deed of Assignment is the legal instrument executed between a buyer and seller upon the negotiation and completion phase of a sale of land transaction, subject to perfection. It is usually demanded by the buyer of the real property at the conclusion of the property transaction as the final legal document that transfers the interest of title in a land without any conditions attached, beyond the payment of the consideration price of the property. In a deed of assignment, the nomenclature of parties changes from Vendor to Assignor and Buyer to Assignee. Upon the execution of a deed of assignment between parties, there is a permanent transfer of legal title and ownership to land from the assignor to the assignee for a consideration paid and accepted by the assignor.

Deed of assignment is required to be evidenced in writing; to be signed, sealed, and delivered by parties to the transaction. A deed of assignment is said to have been delivered when interest has passed to the Assignee and the interest can be passed with or without a physical handover.

Another major difference between a contract of sale and deed is that under a deed of assignment, the title of land acquired is required to be perfected upon payment of the full consideration and execution of the deed. The perfection of title involves the assignee taken the required steps to register the deed of assignment at the appropriate Land Registry. The process for the perfection of a deed of assignment involves the following three steps;

• Obtaining Governors Consent.
• Stamping of the deed of assignment, and
• Registration of the deed of assignment.

Finally, in a contract of sale, the buyer only acquires equitable interest in the property while the seller retains the legal interest in trust for the buyer. In the deed of assignment, the assignee acquires legal interest in the property and it can serve as a good root of title to subsequent buyers while the interest of the assignor on the same property is completely extinguished.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Related posts.

TYPES OF LAND DOCUMENTS IN NIGERIA – BRIEF OVERVIEW

PROCEDURE FOR BUYING PROPERTY IN LAGOS NIGERIA

OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL HOUSING FUNDING (NHF) SCHEME IN NIGERIA

How to investigate title to land in lagos.

TYPES OF LAND TITLES IN NIGERIA & DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR LAND PURCHASE

Subscription for updates from us.

Deed of Assignment | Assignor | Assignee

Assign your property to another with a "deed of assignment".

Transfer your property to another person

Last updated on 16 November 2023

1. What is a Deed of Assignment? 

A Deed of Assignment is a contract where the owner (the “assignor”) transfers ownership over property to another person (the “assignee”) by way of assignment. The assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and assumes all the rights and obligations to the property.

2. When do you need a Deed of Assignment?

A Deed of Assignment is used when the owner wants to transfer ownership (and the rights and obligations) over property to another person.

3. What information do you need to create the Deed of Assignment?

To create your Deed of Assignment you’ll need the following minimum information:

• The type of assignor (e.g. individual or business) as well as name and details (e.g. nationality and address).
• The type of assignee (e.g. individual or business) as well as name and details (e.g. nationality and address).
• Brief description of the property to be assigned.

4.  How much is the document?

The document costs PHP 400 for a one-time purchase. Once purchased you have unlimited use and revisions of this type of document.

You can also avail of Premium subscription at PHP 1,000 and get (a) unlimited use of our growing  library  of documents (from affidavits to contracts); and (b) unlimited use of our “ Ask an Attorney ” service, which lets you consult an expert lawyer anytime for any legal concern you have.

Click  here  to get this document

9 Eymard Drive, New Manila Quezon City Owned and operated by JCArteche’s Online Documentation & Referral Services

Back to Top

• Terms of Service
• Privacy Policy
• Create Documents
• Ask An Attorney
• How It Works
• Customer Support

Legal briefing - Novation and assignment of contracts

Publication date: 19 May 2017

In this issue:

What is the difference between novation and assignment?

When is a novation or assignment required and which one do you use, issues to consider when deciding whether to agree to a novation or assignment, executing the novation or assignment.

Commonwealth entities encounter a variety of situations where contractual rights and obligations may need to be transferred from one legal entity to another. This can arise where a supplier is restructuring its operations or as part of a sale of a business. In these situations, there are 2 legal tools available to achieve a transfer of rights or obligations: novation and assignment. This legal briefing sets out some key considerations for Commonwealth entities when considering a novation or assignment.

While this legal briefing looks at novation and assignment of contracts generally, additional issues can arise in the context of interests in land, such as leases – these issues are beyond the scope of this legal briefing.

The following table compares the general principles that distinguish novation from assignment. 1

Table 1: Differences between novation and assignment

A novation is the mechanism by which a contract is terminated and a new contract is made between different or additional parties. 2 The new contract is generally on the same terms as the original contract. A novation has the effect of substituting one party for another party without necessarily changing the rights and obligations under the original contract. The rights and obligations under the original contract can be transferred to the new party.

A novation requires the consent of all the parties to the original contract as well as the consent of the new party. 3 It is a tripartite agreement between the original parties and the new party. Consent of all the parties to enter into the agreement is therefore crucial. 4 A novation usually takes the form of a deed.

Example of novation

The Commonwealth and B have a contract under which B provides certain services.

B is proposing to sell its business to C. C is prepared to take on B’s obligation under the contract with the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth undertakes its due diligence and agrees to the substitution of B with C. For the substitution to occur, a novation is needed. Once the novation is signed, C is responsible to the Commonwealth for the services under the contract.

The following diagram demonstrates this novation.

Diagram 1: Transfer of both rights and obligations

An assignment is the mechanism by which a party to a contract (the assignor) transfers its existing rights and benefits under that contract to a third party (the assignee). 5 Importantly, the assignor cannot transfer its burdens, obligations or liabilities to the assignee through an assignment. 6 This means that the assignor is not released from its obligations under the contract. Further, the assignee does not become a party to the original contract but can enforce their right to receive the assigned benefits.

An assignment does not require a new contract. The assignor must only record the assignment in writing, 7 sign it and provide written notice of the assignment to the other party to the contract. At law it is possible for an assignment of rights to take place without the consent of the other party to the contract. 8 This can be problematic if the other party to the contract prefers to deal with the assignor rather than the new third party. For this reason, most Commonwealth contracts contain a clause which prevents the contractor from assigning its rights under the contract, in whole or in part, without first obtaining the written consent of the Commonwealth. Sometimes the contract will also provide that the Commonwealth is not obliged to give its consent. Sometimes, this clause will refer to the consent not being ‘unreasonably withheld’.

Example of assignment

The Commonwealth and B have a contract under which B provides consultancy services to the Commonwealth. B wants to transfer its right to receive payment for the services to a third party, C. For this to occur, B can assign its rights to receive payment under the contract to C. This can be achieved through a deed of assignment between B and C. At law, the assignment can occur without any involvement of or consent from the Commonwealth. Importantly, B continues to remain a party to the contract with the Commonwealth, so B is still obliged to perform the services and B’s contractual liabilities remain unchanged. However, the third party, C, will have a legally enforceable right to receive the Commonwealth’s payment for the services that B performs.

Although C is not made a party to the original contract between the Commonwealth and B, the practical result of the assignment is that C can enforce the right to receive payment under the contract against the Commonwealth.

The following diagram demonstrates this arrangement.

Diagram 2: Transfer of rights only

Commonwealth entities are often asked to consider requests to novate or assign agreements. These requests can arise with funding agreements, contracts for goods and services and other agreements for a variety of reasons.

Where a change to the underlying contractual arrangements is requested, the Commonwealth entity will need to consider whether the proposed change is acceptable and determine whether a novation or an assignment is most appropriate. 9

Do I use a novation or an assignment?

Is the new party taking over both rights and obligations , with the existing contractor not to have an ongoing role under the contract?

• a novation will usually be required.

Is the new party taking over contractual rights only , with the existing contractor continuing to be responsible for performing obligations?

• an assignment will usually be required.

The table below outlines some common situations in which the question of novation or assignment might arise.

Table 2: Circumstances that may result in a novation or assignment

When an agency is considering whether to agree to a novation or assignment, there will be a range of matters that will need to be addressed. In some cases, it may be appropriate to terminate the existing contract and undertake a new procurement or funding process.

First, the terms of the existing contract should be considered. The contract may include provisions dealing directly with novation or assignment. Many Commonwealth contracts prohibit novation or assignment without the consent of the Commonwealth entity. This allows the Commonwealth entities to carefully select their suppliers, contractors, funding recipients and other parties that they are dealing with. It is common for these contractual provisions to specify that the Commonwealth will not unreasonably withhold approval for novation or assignment. Conversely, the contract may include a standing consent 11  by the Commonwealth to certain kinds of novation or assignment (for example, within the same corporate group). Even in this case, a formal deed of novation will usually still be required.

Second, when an agency is deciding whether to agree to a novation or assignment, it may need to consider a range of approval processes and risk management requirements that apply to this commitment of relevant money. It may be necessary to check the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (in particular, s 15, s 16 and ss 25–29), the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Rules 2014 (in particular, rule 18), the accountable authority instructions and other applicable legislation that may specifically apply to the contract.

Third, although strictly not directly relevant to the novation or assignment, it is common for variations to the contract to be raised at the same time. Agencies should approach any request for a variation as part of a novation or assignment in the same way they would at any other point in the contract period.

Due diligence

The information you need will vary from case to case but might include the following.

Background entity information on the new party

• What are the management capabilities of the entity?
• Has the Commonwealth previously dealt with the entity?
• Is the body a foreign entity? If so, advice may be required as to whether it has executed a binding contract.
• Is the body a partnership or unincorporated association? If so, who will be bound by the contract following the novation?
• Is the body the trustee of a trust? If so, does the trustee have the requisite authority under the trust deed?
• Do you have information on any relevant ‘fit and proper person’ considerations?

Financial status information

• How does the financial status of the new contractor compare with that of the existing contractor?
• Should you seek a parent guarantee or other security (is the body a $2 company)?
• Do you require independent financial advice on any figures that the new party has provided?
• Can the new party meet the insurance requirements specified in the contract?

Evidence of the company’s ability to perform the contract

• What is happening to any key personnel under the contract? Are they moving to the new party?
• Will the new party have access to all relevant facilities and specialist equipment?
• Does the new party hold all relevant licences and registrations?
• Do you have evidence that the company will satisfy the conditions or requirements of the contract – for example, will it hold funding in a special account or satisfy milestone requirements or any relevant eligibility criteria for funding?

Proposed transitional arrangements

If it is decided that a novation or assignment will be agreed to then it may be necessary to put transitional arrangements in place. Matters that may need to be considered will include the following:

• What are the interim arrangements for performance of the activity (for example, arrangements between the time the novation is agreed to and the deed of novation is executed)?
• Is there a transition plan?
• What resources will be needed to manage the transition? Who will bear the cost?

Novations: matters to consider

• Is the Commonwealth satisfied that the new contractor can perform the obligations under the contract and manage risk? Is the new contractor an acceptable entity to contract with in terms of due diligence process on probity issues, financial viability and capability?
• Who will be liable for past performance or defaults before the new contractor takes over? Will the existing contractor remain liable for its performance or will the new contractor take on responsibility for any problems with the original contractor’s performance?
• Will the novation have any impact on subcontracts or other contracts – for example, contracts with other parties working on the same site?
• Are there any issues with the existing contractor’s performance that should be addressed and finalised before agreeing to the deed of novation? Make sure that you do not inadvertently make unintended amendments to the contract. For example, an acknowledgement of correspondence about a proposed novation which mentions a related delay in delivery may be taken to be acceptance of the delay.
• Are there specific issues for the particular type of contract? For example, where a grant agreement deals with assets purchased with the grant, you may need to ensure those assets are being transferred to the new contractor (unless otherwise agreed).
• Are there any existing securities or financial arrangements under the original contract that need to be replaced or updated? For example, even if both the existing and new contractor are subsidiaries of the same parent entity, an existing parent guarantee or other security may need to be amended to cover the new contractor. There may also be Personal Property Security Register entries that need to be updated.
• At what point will the new contractor take over from the existing contractor: the date the novation deed is signed or a different date?
• Are there any additional costs and who will bear these costs? Usually the party that is seeking the novation is required to meet the other party’s costs.

Assignments: matters to consider

• Is the Commonwealth satisfied that the assignor can continue to perform its obligations under the contract without receiving payment?
• Does the assignor have financial viability issues? Has the assignor sold its right to receive payment from the Commonwealth as part of a settlement of a debt with a creditor?
• What is the underlying reason for the proposed assignment?
• Is the proposed assignment detrimental to the Commonwealth?
• Does the contract between the Commonwealth and the proposed assignor propose to create a confidential relationship or an enduring relationship? Does the Commonwealth want to have any engagement with the proposed assignee?

Once an agency has decided to accept a novation or assignment, the new arrangements must be recorded. The original contract may establish the form of instrument required to execute the novation or assignment. 12 In any event, the instrument may need to reflect the following.

A deed of novation will typically:

• substitute one party for another
• include mutual release of future obligations under the original contract between the Commonwealth and the original contractor
• clearly specify responsibilities and liability of the original contractor and the new contractor for the pre-novation period – often supported by indemnities
• include representations and warranties with respect to the power of the original contractor and the new contractor to enter into the deed of novation
• include an agreement as to costs that the parties will bear in connection with the preparation, execution and completion of the novation – it is common for the other parties to pay the Commonwealth’s costs.

A deed of assignment will typically:

• unconditionally transfer the relevant benefit to the assignee, giving the assignee complete control of that benefit, including the right to take legal action to enforce it
• clearly specify whether there will be a redemption or reassignment in the future – for example, upon repayment of a loan
• confirm arrangements for the ongoing performance of the contract by the assignee
• include agreement as to costs to be borne by the parties in connection with the preparation, execution and completion of the assignment – it is common for the other parties to pay the Commonwealth’s costs.

1 See generally Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365, 388.

2 See Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365, 388.

3 See Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365, 388. Note that, in Leveraged Equities Ltd v Goodridge (2011) 191 FCR 71, the Full Federal Court held that it is possible for a contracting party to prospectively authorise a novation to be made by another party unilaterally. See also CSG Ltd v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 335,134.

4 See F ightvision Pty Ltd v Onisforou (1999) 47 NSWLR 473, 491–492; and Vickery v Woods (1952) 85 CLR 33, 345.

5 Norman v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 109 CLR 9, 26.

6 ALH Group Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2012) 245 CLR 338, 346 [12].

7 This is a legislative requirement in each state: see, for example, Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) s 134.

8 See Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365, 388.

9 In CSG Limited v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 335, [133], Sackville AJA (Bathurst CJ and Campbell JA agreeing) observed that the end result in a case of novation and a case of assignment may be similar.

10 In some cases the contract may require agency approval to some of these changes or other amendments to the contract. This is different from a novation or assignment.

11 See note 3.

12 In Leveraged Equities Ltd v Goodridge (2011) 191 FCR 71, the Court stressed the importance of drafting novation and assignment clauses in the original contract clearly to avoid ambiguity when one or more parties later seek to novate or assign.

Deputy General Counsel Commercial

Senior Lawyer

The material in this briefing is provided to AGS clients for general information only and should not be relied upon for the purpose of a particular matter. Please contact AGS before any action or decision is taken on the basis of any of the material in this briefing.