Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Psychological Science
- Thematic Issue Article: Historical Perspective
- Published: 29 July 2015
- Volume 10 , pages 263–272, ( 2015 )
Cite this article
- Katherine Nelson 1
1301 Accesses
Explore all metrics
The field of psychology has emphasized quantitative laboratory research as a defining character of its role as a science, and has generally de-emphasized qualitative research and theorizing throughout its history. This article reviews some of the effects of this emphasis in two areas, intelligence testing, and learning and memory. On one side, quantitative measurement produced the widely used IQ test but shed little light on the construct of intelligence and its role in human cognition. On the other side, reductive quantification and experimental constraints limited the investigation and understanding of human memory systems and complex learning throughout the first century of the field’s history. Recent research under fewer constraints has made greater progress in these areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Similar content being viewed by others
Intelligence: The Psychological View
Meta-intelligence: understanding, control, and coordination of higher cognitive processes.
- Intelligence
Neisser appears later here for his work on memory and intelligence.
This assumption holds today in many arenas. A more moderate assumption is that all levels are appropriate for investigation, and that feedback from a higher level to a lower may be as informative—and sometimes more informative—as the discovery of an important unit and function at the lower level can be for understanding the higher (see Gottlieb 1992 ).
See Nelson ( 2012 ) for a version of the history and influence of this theory.
My own experience bridged the two orientations: My PhD from UCLA in 1968 was in experimental psychology, essentially behaviorist, specialized in child psychology. My first two publications were in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology .
This is not the place for reviewing the controversies about this research and its assumed theoretical basis (see Allen and Bickhard 2013 for review and discussion from several angles).
It was assumed that adults do not develop further intelligence, although with increasing age they acquire more knowledge, on the one hand, but presumably lose more mental speed and memory on the other. This assumption is now in question.
If we consider 1920 as the starting point of widespread IQ testing of populations, this implies a 30 point rise in IQs by the present day, or the difference between average and “genius” on some scales.
Publishers of these tests generally deny that they are the same as IQ tests; rather they are said to measure “academic aptitude.”
For those who may have forgotten or never learned these terms, classical conditioning as designed by Pavlov takes place through the association of a stimulus (e.g., a bell) with a desired outcome (e.g., food); instrumental conditioning is the establishment of a habitual action when followed by a reward (e.g., a rat learning to press a lever to receive food. Rats learning to run through a maze to be rewarded with food or water is another example).
The quotation was part of a paper presented at a memory conference in 1978 and published as a chapter in the 1982 book.
“H.M.” is now famous in memory work, his disabilities (the inadvertent result of surgery to relieve epilepsy) having been studied continuously over decades. A good brief account of his case and its impact on understanding memory in terms of systems may be found in Squire and Wixted ( 2015 ).
See Moscovitch ( 1984 ) for early discussion of these distinctions relevant to infant and child memory.
The revival of interest in Vygotsky’s contributions to social, cultural–historical thinking is especially notable and quite widespread. A return to Piaget’s thinking is less visible, although research in its framework continues in European contexts, but it is always in the background as a model of developmental theory and research program. In the U.S. it was the target of strong criticism during the computational era as cognitive development from a sensorimotor beginning in infancy was deemed inconceivable. Presently interest in terms of a merger of biological and social–cultural–experiential contributions to development has become more prominent.
Allen J, Bickhard M (2013) Transcending nature and nurture. Cogn Dev 28(2). (Special Issue)
Baker-Ward L, Ornstein PA (2013) The coaction of theory and methods in the study of the development of memory. In: Bauer PJ, Fivush R (eds) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 41–64
Chapter Google Scholar
Bartlett FC ([1932]1969) Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bauer P (2007) Remembering the times of our lives: memory in infancy and beyond. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Google Scholar
Bauer PJ, Fivush R (2013) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York
Book Google Scholar
Bruner J (1983) Child’s talk: learning to use language. Norton, New York
Chomsky N (1959) Review of Verbal behavior by B. F. Skinner. Language 35:26–58
Article Google Scholar
Edelman GM (1992) Bright air, brilliant fire: on the matter of the mind. Basic Books, New York
Fivush R (2013) Maternal reminiscing style: the sociocultural construction of autobiographical memory across childhood and adolescence. In: Bauer PJ, Fivush R (eds) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 568–585
Fivush R, Nelson K (2005) Culture and language in the emergence of autobiographical memory. Psychol Sci 15:586–590
Flynn JR (1987) Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure. Psychol Bull 101:171–191
Galton F (1969) Hereditary genius. Macmillan, London
Gottlieb G (1992) Individual behavior and evolution: the genesis of novel behavior. Oxford University Press, New York
Gottlieb G (2003) On making behavioral genetics truly developmental. Hum Dev 46:337–355
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions. MIT Press, Cambridge
James W ([1890]1950) The principles of psychology. Dover Publications, New York
Loftus EF (1979) Eyewitness testimony. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Mandler JM (1984) Stories, scripts, and scenes: aspects of schema theory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Mead GH (1934) Mind, self, and society. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Menary R (ed) (2010) The extended mind. MIT Press, Cambridge
Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97
Moore DS (2015) The developing genome: an introduction to behavioral genetics. Oxford University Press, New York
Moscovitch M (1984) Infant memory, vol 10. Advances in the study of communication and affect. Plenum, New York
Neisser U (1967) Cognitive psychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Neisser U (1982) Memory: what are the important questions? In: Neisser U (ed) Memory observed: remembering in natural contexts. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, pp 2–19
Neisser U (1998) The rising curve. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Neisser U, Boodoo G, Bouchard TJ Jr et al (1996) Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. Am Psychol 51:77–101
Nelson K (1978) How young children develop knowledge of their world in and out of language. In: Siegler RS (ed) Children’s thinking: what develops? Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 225–273
Nelson K (1993) The psychological and social origins of autobiographical memory. Psychol Sci 4:1–8
Nelson K (1996) Language in cognitive development: the emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge University Press, New York
Nelson K (2003) Self and social functions: individual autobiographical memory and collective narrative. Memory 11:125–136
Nelson K (2007) Young minds in social worlds: experience, meaning, and memory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Nelson K (2012) The human nature of the economic mind. Biol Theory 6:377–387
Nelson K (2013) Sociocultural theories of memory development. In: Bauer PJ, Fivush R (eds) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 87–108
Nelson K, Fivush R (2004) The emergence of autobiographical memory: a social cultural developmental theory. Psychol Rev 111:486–511
Perrin D, Rousset S (2014) The episodicity of memory: current trends in philosophy and psychology. Rev Philos Psychol 5:291–312
Prinz W (2012) Open minds: the making of agency and intentionality. MIT Press, Cambridge
Schaie KW (1997) The course of adult intellectual development. Am Psychol 49:304–313
Schank R, Abelson R (1977) Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Skinner BF (1957) Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Spearman C (1904) “General Intelligence” objectively determined and measured. Am J Psychol 15:201–293
Squire LR, Wixted JT (2015) Remembering. Daedalus, Winter:53–67
Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Tomasello M (2008) The origins of human communication. MIT Press, Cambridge
Tulving E (1982) Elements of episodic memory. Oxford University Press, New York
Tulving E (2005) Episodic memory and autonoesis: uniquely human? In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds) The missing link in cognition: origins of self-reflective consciousness. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–56
Wang Q (2013) The cultured self and remembering. In: Bauer PJ, Fivush R (2013) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 605–625
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Distinguished Professor of Psychology Emerita, City University of New York Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA
Katherine Nelson
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Katherine Nelson .
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Nelson, K. Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Psychological Science. Biol Theory 10 , 263–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-015-0216-0
Download citation
Received : 04 January 2015
Accepted : 16 June 2015
Published : 29 July 2015
Issue Date : September 2015
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-015-0216-0
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Experimental psychology
- Qualitative research
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The field of psychology has emphasized quantitative laboratory research as a defining character of its role as a science, and has generally de-emphasized qualitative research and theorizing throughout its history. This article reviews some of the effects of this emphasis in two areas, intelligence testing, and learning and memory. On one side, quantitative measurement produced the widely used ...